Contractors who worked on Tom Cruise‘s Clearwater, Florida, penthouse were left chasing unpaid bills totaling $770,000.

The Hollywood star reportedly spent around $3 million upgrading the $9.58 million property with custom interiors and high-end fixtures, but multiple contractors were forced to file liens to recover what they were owed.

Currently, one lien for a painting job remains unresolved, which an expert has claimed could lead to complications for Tom Cruise if he intends to sell the house in the future.

The Movie Star Reportedly Owed Contractors Over $770,000

Despite being one of Hollywood’s highest-paid actors, Tom Cruise reportedly delayed payments to contractors who worked on his luxury Florida penthouse.

According to the Daily Mail, Cruise purchased the Clearwater property for $9.58 million in 2017 and began renovations the following year.

He spent around $3 million on high-end fixtures, custom interiors, and other renovation requirements.

However, instead of paying contractors on schedule, Cruise is said to have withheld payments, forcing some of the companies to file liens in order to recover what they were owed.

The news outlet reported that as many as six liens were filed against the actor, some targeting the penthouse and others linked to a separate unit within the same SkyView building.

Altogether, the total amount owed reportedly reached a whopping $770,000.

Tom Cruise Was Forced To Settle Some Contractors’ Debts After They Filed Liens

Findings from the Daily Mail also revealed that Cruise hired Atlanta-based Mortensen Woodwork Inc. and Craftsmanship Installations Inc. to work on his Clearwater penthouse, which is located a few blocks away from Scientology’s Flag Building, the church’s global HQ.

Mortensen billed over $1.5 million, while Craftsmanship charged $416,650. By the time their work was completed in 2020, they were still owed $508,021 and $41,065, respectively.

In 2022, Cruise reportedly fell further behind by $100,000 with Mortensen Woodwork, paying only $150,000 of a $250,000 fee for a separate project.

Other contractors were also affected. Glass manufacturer Tab Glass was owed $63,725 from a $299,422 project, and A and A Clean Up Inc., which handles construction cleanup, had $11,830 unpaid after charging the “Mission Impossible” star $51,400.

All of these contractors filed liens on the property at various times, ultimately forcing Cruise to make payments in order to have the liens removed.

The Actor Allegedly Still Owes A Contractor Nearly $45,000 Since 2021

At present, one lien on the property remains unresolved, filed by Tampa-based Five Arrows Inc. The company invoiced Cruise $261,326 for a painting job completed in January 2021, but the actor still owes $44,240.

While Cruise has not explained why the debt remains unpaid more than five years after the work was completed, an expert suggested the outstanding balance may be related to possible disputes over the quality of the job.

“Sometimes, if there is a dispute between the vendor and property owner on workmanship quality, the property owner will not pay the invoice, and the vendor files a lien. This does not mean that the property owner has done anything wrong or is simply a slow pay,” strategic financing advisor, Darren K. Proulx, revealed to the outlet.

“It could mean that the vendor provided less than industry-standard workmanship and the property owner is refusing to pay for the low-quality workmanship,” he added.

Tom Cruise Could Face Issues If He Attempts To Sell The Apartment

Speaking further about the unresolved payment dispute, the Real Estate Bees employee warned that Cruise could face potential complications in the future if he continues to leave the debt unpaid.

“Typically, a negotiated settlement between the parties resolves the issue. Yet, in this case, no agreement has been reached, as the lien is still in place, which could result in implications if Cruise ever wanted to sell the apartment,” he said.

Proulx previously noted that companies like Five Arrows Inc. and the other contractors previously owed by Cruise were fully within their rights to file liens for unpaid bills, as the law empowers them to take such action.

“Most states have enacted laws that allow these entities to file what are called Mechanic’s Liens that can ultimately force a sale of the property to ensure payment to these unpaid vendors,” the expert revealed.

Tom Cruise Left Staff Stunned After Abruptly Ditching His London Penthouse For The US

The recent report about Cruise’s Florida home comes two months after it was revealed that he made an abrupt decision to leave the UK and move back to the US.

A source who spoke with the Mail on Sunday shared at the time that staff were “stunned” by his departure as it came without notice.

“Tom loved London. He loved where he lived; he would get up and go for [a] run around Hyde Park in the mornings,” a source stated. “He loved walking in the local area, but he also really, really enjoyed jumping in a helicopter at Battersea Heliport and flying off into the quintessentially British countryside.”

“It all happened very quickly,” the source continued. “It was a surprise to the staff at the building where his penthouse is. It’s most strange.”

“England became far more than just a filming base,” they noted about Cruise’s sudden exit. In the meantime, it’s still unclear why the actor made the abrupt decision.

The internet is already sounding off about Druski and his “conservative women” skit. On Thursday, he added fuel to the conversation with a photo dump. One photo in the post appears to be from his childhood, him and an older white man. And now the reactions aren’t just about his comedic skills or Erika Kirk, but also Druski’s own family! Meanwhile, he’s keeping his words to a minimum and promoting his other projects amid the mixed reactions.

RELATED: Oh, You Got Jokes? Ted Cruz Claps Back At Druski’s Viral ‘Conservative Women’s Skit

Druski Asks The Question “Too Far” 

The comedian hasn’t said anything about the internet, but he has found similarities between his skit character and Charlie Kirk’s wife, Erika. That hasn’t stopped the name-dropping, jokes, think pieces and old videos surfacing about Mrs. Kirk. Keep in mind, Druski didn’t name anyone in his skit. Still, his outfits, makeup, and scenarios in the video are being compared to Erika’s in the months since her husband’s death. As said, the reactions are all over the place! Some are catching the kiii, while others say he took it over the line. Also, some are trying to pull a reverse uno with “whiteface” comments.

On Thursday, Druski wrote in his IG caption, “TOO FAR???,” adding side-eye emojis. The post itself was a dump of photos of himself on set, with a kid, talking to Kevin Hart and dressed in his “conservative [white] woman” look. The last slide showed bio photos of white men in black sunglasses with the quote “Yeah, Druski, not funny anymore” above them. And the comment section? More than 30,000 have weighed in within a day.

Does Druski Have White Relatives? 

Two of the photos in Druski’s IG dump include a photo of a blue-eyed, white man. One is a throwback photo of the man posing with a young Dru. It’s watermarked with the date December 7, 2002. That same man is seen in another photo holding a Billboard magazine with the comedian on the cover. Now, the internet is speculating Druski might have some close Caucasian heritage, though he hasn’t spoken on it. Could the man be his grandad? We’ll see if he tells. Meanwhile, social media isn’t waiting to speculate. Some reactions are even claiming Dru resembles the man.

It’s worth noting this isn’t the first photos the comedian has shared of the man. In January 2023, he shared a photo of him and the man smiling near what looks like a kitchen counter. He asked his followers to caption the photo. It looks like it was taken on the same day as the childhood photo Druski shared on Thursday.

RELATED: Social Media Can’t Stop Mentioning Erika Kirk After Druski Parodies “Conservative Women” In Viral Skit (VIDEO)

Savannah Guthrie’s first sit-down interview following mom Nancy Guthrie’s disappearance was an emotional one.

Savannah, 54, returned to Today for the three-part conversation with former colleague Hoda Kotb, which started airing on Wednesday, March 25. The women shed tears as they discussed the continued search for 84-year-old Nancy, who went missing from her Arizona home on February 1.

“Someone needs to do the right thing. We are in agony. … It is unbearable,” Savannah said on Wednesday. “And to think of what she went through. I wake up every night in the middle of the night. Every night. And in the darkness, I imagine her terror. And it is unthinkable.”

Authorities have yet to name a suspect in her disappearance. However, the FBI released a series of photos and videos of a person wearing an all-black outfit, including a face covering, which were captured on Nancy’s doorbell camera the night she went missing.

Savannah and her family continue to release statements, asking anyone who might have any information to come forward.

“She needs to come home now,” Savannah told Kotb on Wednesday.

During the second part of the interview, released on Thursday, March 26, Savannah said she’s still leaning on her “strong and resolute” faith. She’s also still speaking about her mom in the “present tense.”

“My mom is incredible. She’s resolute and strong, quiet strength. Quiet faith, but hard-fought. She’s funny and a little mischievous, I would say, in her humor,” Savannah said. “She’s a noble creature, she does what’s right. She walks in faith, but not fake, pious, put-on faith.”

Keep scrolling for the biggest revelations from Savannah’s Today interview:

How Did Savannah Guthrie Find Out Mom Nancy Was Missing?

Savannah received a call from her sister, Annie Guthrie, who said, “Mom’s missing.” The day was full of “chaos and disbelief,” she recalled.

“She was in a panic, I was in a panic,” Savannah continued. “We thought that she must have had some kind of medical episode in the night and somehow the paramedics had come, because the back doors were propped open and that didn’t make any sense.”

From the very “early moments” of Nancy’s disappearance, the family knew something was wrong.

“She can’t wander off. My mom, she was in tremendous pain, her back was very bad. On a good day, she could walk down to the mailbox and get the mail, but most days not,” Savannah said. “There was no ‘wander off.’ The doors were propped open, and there was blood on the front doorstep. The Ring camera had been yanked off. And so we were saying, ‘This is not OK.’”

What Is the Possible Motive for Savannah Guthrie’s Mom Nancy’s Kidnapping?

Savannah got emotional wondering whether Nancy’s kidnapping was because of her fame.

“Honestly, we don’t know anything. We don’t know anything. So, I don’t know that it’s because she’s my mom and somebody thought, ‘Oh, that lady has money, we can make a quick buck,’” she added. “That would make sense, but we don’t know. … It’s just too much to bear to think that I brought this to her bedside. That it’s because of me. I have to say, I’m so sorry, Mommy.”

Savannah Guthrie Has Support From Her Family

Savannah said that she and her “amazing” siblings, Annie and Camron, are “a unit.”

“We came together with all these beautiful gifts that came from our mom and dad and from God, and somehow together we did our best to come up with the words to say [in our video],” she shared. “I haven’t posted one thing or said one thing that the three of us haven’t decided together.”

Savannah and husband Michael Feldman try to give their kids, Vale, 11 and Charley, 9, “a little more certainty than we have” when updating them on the situation.

“It’s so hard with kids,” she explained. “You want to protect them.”

Related: Everything Savannah Guthrie Has Said About Her Mom Nancy’s Disappearance

Advertisement

Today cohost Savannah Guthrie has frequently appealed to the public for help following the mysterious disappearance of her 84-year-old mother, Nancy Guthrie, in Arizona. Pima County police suspect that Nancy was abducted from her home in the Catalina Foothills north of Tucson, Arizona, in the early hours of February 1, 2026. Per law enforcement, a […]

The Truth About the Ransom Notes

Savannah confirmed that there were “different notes” that came through.

“Most of them, it’s my understanding, I think are not real. I didn’t see them. A person that would send a fake ransom note really has to look deeply at themselves,” she added. “But I believe the two notes that we received that we responded to — I tend to believe those are real.”

As the investigation continues, Savannah said that she has moved houses “many times” because people are not “respectful” of what’s happening to her family.

What Was Savannah Guthrie’s Reaction to Doorbell Camera Video From Nancy’s Kidnapping?

The Today anchor said the video is “absolutely terrifying” to watch.

“I’m glad and grateful to the investigators and the technology companies that were able to find that video,” Savannah said. “So, I hope at least with people of good heart and compassion stop the irresponsible and cruel speculation that had started to swirl. I’m glad that people saw what came to our door.”

She also said there are “no words” for the rumors that her family was involved in Nancy’s disappearance.

“I don’t understand, I’ll never understand. And no one took better care of my mom than my sister and my brother-in-law,” she added. “No one protected my mom more than my brother. We love her, and she is our shining light. She is our matriarch. She’s all we have.”

Savannah didn’t say much about the ongoing investigation but noted that the family needs “answers” about Nancy’s whereabouts.

“We cannot be at peace without knowing,” she explained. “And someone can do the right thing. And it is never too late to do the right thing. Our hearts are focused on that.”

How Is Savannah Guthrie Staying Connected to Mom Nancy Amid Her Disappearance?

Savannah credits her “faith” for helping her stay close to mom Nancy amid her disappearance.

“God is how I’m holding hands with my mom, and I won’t let sadness win, for her,” Savannah said. “She taught me, I saw her grieve. I saw her world shatter. I saw it and I saw her get up. And I saw her believe. And I saw her love. And I saw her hope, and I saw her smile, and I saw her laugh. I saw her joy. I saw her love for the world and adventure. I saw her belief, I saw her faith.”

Related: Savannah Guthrie Breaks Down Over Possibly Causing Mom’s Kidnapping

Savannah Guthrie shared more thoughts on her mother Nancy Guthrie’s continued disappearance. During an emotional interview on the Thursday, March 26, broadcast of Today, Savannah, 54, spoke to Hoda Kotb about the possibility that someone targeted Nancy, 84, because of her daughter’s fame. She recalled speaking to her brother, Camron, who previously worked in military […]

Savannah noted that she will “not fall apart” as questions linger about her mom’s whereabouts.

“They will not take our faith, but our anguish is real. We need help. We need someone to tell the truth,” she continued. “I have no anger in my heart. I have hope in my heart. I have love, but this family needs peace. I don’t think we deserve anything more or less than any other person.”

Savannah continued begging for “an answer,” noting that someone “has it in their power to help” find Nancy.

“It is never too late, and when you do, the warmth of love and forgiveness that will come will be greater than can be imagined,” she added. “I know what it is to be forgiven. And there is no greater joy, and that joy awaits whoever can hear this and find it in their heart to help.

Why Did Savannah Guthrie Visit the ‘Today’ Show Set?

Savannah returned to Studio 1A to visit her Today colleagues earlier this month.

“I really wanted to come and see everybody. I just love this beautiful place that we call home,” she said. “I know how much people have prayed for me and loved me, all the people that you see on TV, you know, and then all the people that you don’t. All the notes and messages that I have received, they’re just so beautiful. I just wanted to be with my family. They’re my family too.”

When Will Savannah Guthrie Return to the ‘Today’ Show?

It was confirmed that Savannah will return to Today on Monday, April 6.

“When I look at the Today show, it’s the answer to all of my dreams, actually better than my dreams,” she said. “It’s hard to imagine doing it because it’s such a place of joy and lightness. I can’t come back and try to be something that I’m not. But I can’t not come back because it’s my family. I think it’s part of my purpose right now. I want to smile, and when I do, it will be real. And my joy will be my protest. My joy will be my answer. And being there is joyful. And when it’s not, I’ll say so.”

By Joshua Tyler
| Published 24 seconds ago

Americans used to believe the news was unbiased, and, whether that was ever true or not, for a long time, there was an attempt to make it seem true. Eventually, the news media dropped even the pretense of being factual and went full force into openly delivering sensationalist propaganda, but they couldn’t have gotten away with it at scale if their viewers hadn’t already been conditioned to accept it.

That conditioning first began working on the public with one hugely influential movie that twisted viewers into thinking it was condemning irresponsible television, while subtly convincing them that irresponsibility was the only path to truth. And maybe, just maybe, it was right.

This is the story of how Network Screenwashed audiences into accepting fake news.

Network’s Story Of Corruption

Network follows aging news anchor Howard Beale, played by Peter Finch, as he learns he’s about to be fired after years of declining viewership. In a moment of despair, Beale announces on live television that he plans to kill himself during a broadcast. 

The shocking moment briefly boosts ratings, and when Beale returns to the air, he delivers a furious rant urging viewers to shout from their windows that they are “mad as hell.” Sensing an opportunity, ambitious producer Diana Christensen (Faye Dunaway) reinvents the news broadcast as a spectacle built around Beale’s emotional tirades. 

The script presents this as a horrifying corruption of journalism. But the film’s structure quietly and intentionally undermines that message at every turn. It does that using a four-step persuasion pattern.

Screenwashed By Affective Conditioning 

Affective Conditioning is a persuasion process where repeated emotional cues are paired with a person, idea, or behavior so audiences automatically feel positively or negatively about it without consciously evaluating the argument.

Beale’s tirades are honest and compelling. His rants about alienation, corporate power, and media manipulation resonate because the film never actually proves him wrong, and they accurately mirror what people in the 70s were beginning to suspect about the true nature of their world.

Meanwhile, Beale himself is a true believer in what he’s saying and one of only two people in the film who isn’t a liar or a hypocrite. More on who the other one is, in a moment.

Though Beale is breaking all the rules and standards, you can’t help but feel good about him.

Screenwashed By Poisoning the Well

Poisoning the Well is a rhetorical tactic where the people criticizing a position are themselves portrayed as corrupt, immoral, or evil, so the audience dismisses their criticism before considering it.

Network tries to seem like it’s offsetting sympathy for Beale by framing him as mentally ill, using other characters who are shocked by what he’s doing. But every character who calls Beale insane or condemns his editorializing rants is portrayed as morally repulsive and unreliable.

The network executives exploiting him are greedy opportunists. The corporate leadership is portrayed as cold and sinister. When these characters insist Beale is unstable, the audience instinctively distrusts those accusers, because our opinion of them has already been poisoned. 

The only character truly defending traditional journalism is Max Schumacher (William  Holden). Unfortunately for the argument he’s supposed to represent, Max spends the entire movie cheating on his wife and enabling the very circus he claims to oppose. His moral authority is nonexistent, and the institution he defends collapses with him.

What Howard does is far more authentic than the fake dog and pony show of normal news that 1970s news consumers have been watching in the real world. At first, Howard’s tirades are largely anger and frustration. His ratings soar and audiences flock to him. When he demands they open their windows and shout “I’m mad as hell and I’m not gonna take it anymore!” into the wind, city streets echo with the sound of outraged voices.

That’s when we meet the only other honest character in the film.

Screenwashed By Revelation Framing

Revelation Framing is a persuasion technique where information is presented as if it’s a shocking truth that the audience is just now discovering. Instead of arguing a point, the message is structured like a reveal: first, something seems confusing or wrong, then the “hidden truth” is exposed. 

This often produces a feeling of emotional release or catharsis, because the audience feels like they’ve finally figured out what’s really going on. The power of the technique comes from making people feel like they’ve had an awakening, rather than feeling like someone is trying to convince them.

By framing an idea as a profound revelation rather than an argument, the audience is encouraged to accept it as insight or enlightenment rather than critically evaluate it as a claim. Instead of exposing Beale as a lunatic, the film validates him.

Howard Beale has begun trashing his network’s parent company, and so he’s brought to a meeting with conglomerate chairman Arthur Jenson, played by 1970s powerhouse Ned Beatty. Arthur Jensen doesn’t dismiss Beale’s warnings about corporate power. He confirms them. In one of the film’s most famous speeches, Jensen explains that the world is run by vast economic forces beyond the control of nations or voters.

The movie’s supposed madman is suddenly the only person who understands reality. For unstable Howard Beale, it’s a revelation. He says he believes that he has just seen God.

Howard stops his tirade against the company and begins preaching a deeper truth to his audience. Not because he’s been corrupted, but because he’s been converted by revelation.

Screenwashed By Martyrdom Framing

Martyrdom Framing is a narrative device in which a character is killed or punished for their beliefs, signaling to the audience that their message must have been true or threatening to powerful interests.

Howard Beale’s reputation as a truth teller is cemented in the mind of the audience by the film’s ending, in which Beale is murdered live on air. Like Jesus Christ, Socrates, and many others throughout history who were right, Howard Beale is made a martyr for speaking out, further cementing his status as a hero in the minds of Network’s viewers. 

How Network Created What It Hated

The film’s director, Sidney Lumet, may have intended Network to be a cautionary tale, but instead it subtly conditions the audience to accept the very thing it’s supposed to be warning them against by making the man who perverts the news into a hero surrounded on all sides by evil.

You might think that could be a positive, since Howard is a truth teller and Network persuades the audience they’d be better off with news men who stand up and voice their opinions, than those who sit and read copy. That would be accurate if audiences could tell who was telling the truth and who wasn’t, but they can’t.

When Network normalized the idea of news men voicing opinions, it normalized the good along with bad, creating a new vector for mass media manipulation.

How Network Changed The World For The Better

There’s another way to read it. A look back at history reveals that maybe news was never truly neutral; it was simply better at pretending to be. 

Anchors delivered narratives with calm voices and professional posture, and the performance of objectivity made those narratives feel like facts. If Network helped strip that mask away, it may have exposed something that was already there. 

Opinion didn’t invade the news; Network may have inadvertently helped it stop hiding. The result of that is messier and often more manipulative, but it’s also more honest about what the medium actually is: people interpreting events, not machines reporting them. In that sense, the loud, openly opinionated era of media may be less deceptive than the quiet one that claimed neutrality while shaping the story all the same.

George Clooney Proved Network Right

Decades later, the 2005 movie Good Night, and Good Luck would quietly (and accidentally) prove Network’s point by trying to screenwash audiences into believing the opposite. Good Night, and Good Luck was the retelling of how, in 1954, CBS journalist Edward R. Murrow used his television news program See It Now to directly challenge the methods of Joseph McCarthy, who had built national fame by accusing government officials, soldiers, and entertainers of communist ties. 

Rather than doing a straight report on the controversy or giving the audience facts, Murrow devoted an entire broadcast to criticizing McCarthy’s tactics. He assembled character assassination clips of the senator’s own speeches and interrogations with the clear goal to persuade his audience into sharing his point of view: that McCarthy’s investigations were fraudulent and must be stopped. 

Murrow then cashed in his reputation as an unbiased newsman to deliver an ultra-biased closing editorial warning that the United States risked damaging its democratic principles if suspicion replaced evidence. The broadcast was one of the first major television moments in which a national news anchor openly used his platform to challenge a powerful political figure, helping turn public opinion against McCarthy and marking a turning point in the senator’s influence.

The only difference between Beale’s fiction and Murrow’s history is framing. In the George Clooney-directed movie, Murrow’s opinionated broadcast is presented as courageous journalism through a series of familiar narrative tricks. These are designed to distract the audience from the bias in Murrow’s broadcasts.

Murrow is intentionally depicted as the opposite of Howard Beale. He’s calm, rational, and morally steady. His opponent appears mainly through his most extreme moments. The black-and-white cinematography, cigarette-smoked newsrooms, and restrained dialogue all signal integrity even though there is none. 

The audience isn’t just hearing Murrow’s argument. They’re being conditioned to experience it as responsible and sane, whether it is or not. Strip away those cues, and the act itself looks very familiar: a television newsman abandoning neutrality to tell the public what they should believe. Howard Beale and the real anchors who followed Murrow simply did it louder and more obviously.

Network’s Brave New World

Whether Network meant to or not, it prepared audiences for a new kind of journalism. One where the anchor isn’t pretending to be neutral anymore. One where outrage replaces reporting. One where the loudest voice in the room becomes the most trusted one. In other words, it helped create exactly the world we live in now. 

Congratulations news puppets, you’ve been screenwashed.

The cast of Hulu’s “Secret Lives of Mormon Wives” has been navigating troubled waters over the past month, and the latest incident involving Jessi Draper and Miranda Hope may be more than the women can handle. In the past 24 hours, reports have surfaced that Draper allegedly kissed Hope’s ex-husband, Chase McWhorter, adding fuel to what already feels like a never-ending cycle of dramatic feuds.

Jessi Draper Reportedly Kissed Miranda Hope’s Ex-Husband, Chase McWhorter

The drama began when blogger Deuxmoi shared a tip alleging that Draper and McWhorter were spotted kissing at a friend’s birthday party over the weekend. The claim seemed bogus; however, Hope shared a photo of flowers allegedly sent to her by Draper on her Instagram Stories.

“I completely understand you being upset with me,” the card read. “But wanted to send you a little something to let you know I’m thinking about you, and I am so, so sorry. -Jessi.”

After that, Hope posted a TikTok and seemed to confirm the rumors by writing the caption, “GRWM while I process my friend group being a waiting room for my ex-husband.” She added, “It’s not even betrayal at this point, it’s a tradition.”

Miranda Hope Shares A Statement Following The Rumors, Says She Feels ‘Slighted’ By Jessi Draper For Allegedly Kissing Her Ex

In a statement to Entertainment Tonight, Hope seemed to confirm the rumors, stating that she’s “familiar with this territory.”

While Hope admitted she knew about the communication between her ex-husband and Draper, she was unaware of how close they had become.

Hope explained that she received a heads-up about Draper and McWhorter’s alleged kiss and said her co-star reached out only after Hope learned she knew, resulting in a surprise set of flowers.

“What I never want to get misconstrued is that there is not any emotional attachment to Chase. He is my co-parent. Although I do feel disrespected by Chase, I feel slighted by my friend. Chase and I are no longer partners, and while I have high expectations of him as a co-parent, I also hold my friends to a high standard and believe in girl code,” Hope finished.

Fans Are Reacting To The Allegations That Jessi Draper Kissed Miranda Hope’s Ex-Husband

Social media users are also reacting to the allegations against Draper and rushing to Hope’s defense.

Advertisement

On Reddit, one user said, “WHY DOES EVERYONE KEEP DOING MIRANDA DIRTY I’M FUCKING SICK!!!”

Another user said, “yeah uhm jessi and chase, yall f-cked up. Miranda needs better friends.”

A third posted, “I feel like everyone seems to think Miranda’s so chill and whatever, so they think they can do whatever and she’ll forgive and forget, but I don’t think Miranda forgets anything and will only forgive so much.”

Another netizen chimed in, speculating that McWhorter was allegedly hooking up with Hope’s friend to get back at her. “This isn’t the 1st, 2nd, or even 3rd time. It’s not normal, and it’s not a coincidence. Also, he doesn’t get an ounce of credit for being “upfront” and telling the mother of his kids that he (once again) couldn’t stay off her friends. It’s just gross,” they wrote.

Advertisement

Draper Is Going Through A Divorce Of Her Own

The allegations surrounding Draper and McWhorter come days after Draper’s husband, Jordan Ngatikaura, filed for divorce, according to PEOPLE.

Draper appeared on a recent episode of “Call Her Daddy” with Alex Cooper and opened up about the downfall of her marriage.

During the conversation, Draper got candid about the alleged “emotional abuse” she’s experienced and even claimed Ngatikaura had cheated on her with escorts during wild parties.

Advertisement

Draper also alleged that she was the victim of blackmail, stating Ngatikaura would threaten her with unreleased text messages that allegedly show her communicating with other men.

Draper’s Husband Releases A Statement Following News Of Divorce

Ngatikaura released a statement after filing for divorce, admitting it wasn’t an “easy decision.”

“I’m grateful for the shared memories and the lessons,” he said to PEOPLE. “While our paths are now moving in different directions, my priority remains my children and ensuring they feel loved, supported, and protected through this transition. I am committed to handling this next chapter with kindness and respect.”

Bravo announced the cast for season 16 of “The Real Housewives of New York City” in March 2026. Among the cast is famed makeup artist Daisy Toye, best known for her work with Martha Stewart. Now, the 84-year-old icon is opening up on her upcoming “RHONY” appearance following rumors she may appear as a housewife herself.

Martha Stewart Says She Had Fun filming ‘RHONY’

TMZ reported on March 16 that Stewart had filmed a cameo for “The Real Housewives of New York City” as production on season 16 had begun. The outlet stated at the time that they had filmed her scenes within the last couple of weeks.

More recently, she spoke to TMZ on March 26 about her “RHONY” cameo. When asked to confirm that she filmed, Stewart said, “Daisy is a fabulous housewife of New York.”

When asked about the production, she stated, “The filming was very fun. They’re very professional, and I think it’s going to be a very exciting series.”

After that, the interviewer asked if the former talk show host planned to make more “RHONY” appearances, or if it was a “one and done” situation. She stated that it was “one and a half done.”

Martha Stewart’s Makeup Artist, Daisy Toye, Was Already Rumored For ‘RHONY’

Bravo announced the cast for season 16 of “RHONY” on March 2. In addition to Toye, the cast includes other newcomers Hailey Glassman and Erika Hammond. Regarding the returners, there are three: Sai De Silva, Jessel Taank, and Erin Lichy. Fans will recall that they initially joined the show amid Bravo’s full reboot ahead of season 15.

Additionally, Carole Radziwill, who appeared on “RHONY” from seasons 5 through 10, will appear as a friend of the show. Regarding Toye joining, Page Six first reported that this was the case in August 2025.

Fans Are Reacting To Her Upcoming Bravo Cameo

Following Stewart’s TMZ interview and the initial announcement of her filming for “RHONY,” fans have had varying opinions. Many are excited to see the beloved businesswoman and television personality on the show, even if it’s only for a scene or two. However, others think the show itself has run its course.

One person said on Instagram, “Martha Stewart, Princess Carole. I don’t know if anyone can help that franchise. We shall see.” Another “RHONY” viewer said, “We have Kathy Hilton, why not?”

Someone else mentioned Toye, writing, “We don’t need Martha’s staff on the show.” Lastly, a different fan mentioned the business she’s built, stating, “I love Martha Stewart. She actually owns her empire and didn’t marry into one. She’s the real deal.”

It Was Rumored That The Homekeeping Expert Would Join ‘RHONY’

There were several reports about “The Real Housewives of New York City” leading up to Bravo’s March 2026 announcement. This includes rumblings that the network was considering a hybrid cast, featuring the legacy ladies and a few from the failed reboot.

One rumor about “RHONY” season 16 was that Bravo was interested in casting Stewart. An insider told Page Six in August 2025, “The producers are talking about it as they interview new people, as they’re planning to bring the show back.”

They added, “Martha Stewart is in talks with Andy Cohen to become a New York housewife.” However, her rep shot down the report, telling the outlet, “not Martha. She says she is not a ‘Housewife.’” Additionally, the network also stated that this was not the case.

Martha Stewart Has A New Restaurant

Stewart has been a fixture in pop culture for decades. However, her television fame has never taken her away from her love of homemaking and cooking. Now, her newest venture involves the latter of the two as she’s opened a new restaurant, The Bedford by Martha Stewart, at the Foxwoods Resort Casino in Mashantucket, Connecticut.

According to CT Insider, Stewart opened the restaurant on March 14, 2026. Notably, this is her first restaurant on the East Coast. Her first was The Bedford by Martha Stewart in Las Vegas, which opened to the public in 2022.

Regarding her television career, Stewart hosted the cooking competition show “Yes Chef” in 2025. However, Deadline reported in March 2026 that NBC had decided not to renew the series for a second season. This is despite the show delivering consistent viewership across its 10 episodes.

Published Mar 27, 2026, 2:03 PM EDT

Advertisement

These television artists were posthumously recognized for their work, and the awards they received were testaments to their lasting legacies.

Image via Marcus Owen/startraksphoto.com

Kelly Ripa is said to have no plans to bring back Howie Mandel after their tense encounter on her show.

The “America’s Got Talent” judge appeared to snap at Ripa on Monday’s episode of “Live with Kelly and Mark” after she made comments about his looks and age.

According to reports, Kelly Ripa feels the 70-year-old “disrespected” her and made her feel “uncomfortable” on her own set. As such, she feels freezing him out is the best move to protect the show.

Kelly Ripa Felt ‘Disrespected’ By Awkward Exchange With Howie Mandel

A potential return for Howie Mandel to “Live with Kelly and Mark” may be off the table for now after his uncomfortable exchange with co-host Ripa during Monday’s episode.

Sources say Ripa was left unimpressed by Mandel’s response to her exchange of remarks about his age, which centered on him hitting the 70th year milestone.

“He disrespected her in her house,” an insider told Rob Shuter’s #ShuterScoop about Mandel. “That’s her show, her audience, her tone — and he bulldozed right through it.”

Meanwhile, although Ripa tried to maintain a cool front during the interaction, within her, she was unsettled as she felt that the moment disrupted the flow of her tightly run show.

“Kelly runs a tight, polished ship,” another insider said about the TV personality. “She expects guests to play along, keep it light, and protect the vibe. That interview did the opposite.”

The TV Personality Reportedly Won’t Ask Back The Talent Show Judge

Despite her reported stance, Ripa is not expected to explicitly tell Mandel he is no longer welcome on the show.

Instead, she would likely take a more subtle approach to avoid a reunion and expects Mandel to pick up on the signals.

“She’ll never say ‘you’re banned,’” an insider shared. “But suddenly bookings get tricky, schedules don’t align, and invites… vanish.”

“Howie won’t be asked back,” another source further emphasized. “Not after making her uncomfortable on her own set.”

All of this is reportedly part of her effort to keep the focus on her show, especially after Mandel disrupted its carefully maintained vibe.

“In daytime TV, chemistry is everything,” another insider continued. “Once that trust is broken, it’s almost impossible to rebuild.”

All About The Tense Moment Between Kelly Ripa And Howie Mandel

On the episode of “Live with Kelly and Mark,” Ripa and her husband, Mark Consuelos, began the conversation by congratulating Mandel on recently turning 70.

“It doesn’t make any sense,” Ripa remarked of the comedian’s age and looks, prompting Mandel to respond, “What do you mean it doesn’t make any sense?”

Trying to smooth things over, Consuelos explained, “You look great.” Mandel then repeated the phrase incredulously: “That I look great? That doesn’t mean anything.”

He went on, “No, no, no. I don’t like that because that’s a caveat, ’cause you tell someone you’re 70, and they go, ‘you look great….’”

Ripa, determined to ensure Mandel gets it, jumped in with a clarification.

“We’re not saying you look great for 70. We’re saying you look great, and I don’t believe you’re 70,” the co-host said.

Howie Mandel Refused To Back Down From His Stance During The Awkward Moment With Kelly Ripa And Mark Consuelos

Ripa’s attempt at reassurance, however, didn’t ease the tension between her and Mandel.

Instead, the moment grew even more uncomfortable as the comedian seemed to fuel it further with a pointed analogy.

“It’s like saying you’re smart for a stupid person,” Mandel remarked. “‘Oh, you seem smart, you seem smart,’ you see, no, I don’t look good.”

Fortunately, the tension eventually eased, with Mandel ultimately accepting the compliment and shifting the conversation to his workout routine.

Social Media Users Slammed Howie Mandel For Being ‘Insecure’ About His Age

Snippets of the tense moment between Ripa and Mandel went viral online and earned reactions from netizens.

Some claimed that there was nothing wrong with what Ripa said, and Mandel was just being “insecure” about his age.

“He’s insecure about his age, that’s the bottom line. Ripa was just being polite,” a user remarked.

“What a pompous jerk. A compliment from @KellyRipa  is pretty pretty pretty pretty good,” another netizen remarked.

“I don’t understand why he was offended by this. He does look great. Putting them in this situation is rude,” one more individual noted.

In a remarkable display of community support, Tyler Perry recently attempted to provide a massive financial lifeline to essential TSA workers at Hartsfield-Jackson Airport. 

While the gesture was met with legal hurdles, the spirit of the act has resonated deeply with witnesses.

Meanwhile, Perry has also been facing legal hurdles of a different kind, having been dragged to court by one Mario Rodriguez for alleged sexual assault. 

Tyler Perry Offers Massive Support to TSA Workers

Media mogul Perry recently visited Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport with the intention of donating a “significant” amount of money to Transportation Security Administration (TSA) agents. 

These federal employees have been working without pay since the government shutdown began on February 14, causing immense financial strain. As such, Perry’s goal was to personally hand out cash to ease their burdens, but he was met with strict government restrictions. 

According to a spokesperson for the Department of Homeland Security, TSA officers are legally prohibited from accepting any gifts or money while at their screening locations. Consequently, Perry was unable to distribute the funds directly to the workers as he had planned.

Despite the refusal of the cash, sources told 11Alive that Perry’s presence and his efforts to thank the workers personally provided a major boost to morale. 

While individual officers cannot take gifts, Aaron Barker, president of the AFGE, noted that TSA unions are not under the same restrictions and can accept donations to distribute to members. 

Tyler Perry Pushed Back Against Sexual Assault Lawsuit 

While Perry’s recent visit to the airport was defined by his desire to give back, the media mogul is currently embroiled in a legal battle that is far less heartwarming. The filmmaker recently broke his silence regarding a second sexual assault lawsuit, this time filed by an actor named Mario Rodriguez. 

Perry is adamantly denying the claims, which allege inappropriate physical contact during the filming of one of his projects. According to The Blast, he has labeled the lawsuit a meritless “ploy” designed to extract money from him. 

This latest legal challenge follows a previous $260 million suit filed by Derek Dixon, which Perry also faced head-on. In the current case, Perry’s legal team argues that Rodriguez is attempting to treat the director like a “piggy bank” after appearing in only a minor role. 

According to court documents, Rodriguez allegedly begged Perry for financial assistance for his car and other personal expenses. Perry claims that once the financial aid stopped, the model began to lash out and eventually filed the “falsehoods” contained in the suit.

The Media Mogul Has Another Project Coming Up

Despite the legal challenges surrounding his personal reputation, Perry’s professional output remains as prolific as ever. In a major move for the streaming giant, a brand-new series titled “Where There’s Smoke” has officially been announced, with Netflix confirming that the show has already entered the production phase.

The Blast confirmed that the upcoming series will consist of 16 episodes. It will follow a crew of dedicated firefighters as they navigate intense professional emergencies and the complicated personal dramas waiting for them at home. 

The cast features a diverse lineup, including Tyler Lepley, Mike Merrill, and Joe Hunter, a notable alum from “Survivor 50.” 

Tyler Perry’s Accuser Allegedly Asked Him For Financial Aid

While Perry continues to expand his creative footprint through “Where There’s Smoke,” his legal battle with Rodriguez still rages on. 

In December 2025, The Blast reported that the case took a complex and highly personal turn when a series of private text messages between the actor and the filmmaker surfaced. 

The surfaced messages detail Rodriguez’s struggle with health issues and his lack of insurance, which he used to appeal to Perry’s generosity. He shared fears of a dental issue turning into sepsis and admitted he was “scared” and unable to handle the situation on his own. 

While Perry’s legal team viewed these messages as evidence of a “money grab” that surfaced only after financial aid stopped, Rodriguez’s representatives argued that maintaining a cordial relationship is a common coping mechanism for survivors of abuse involving power dynamics.

Tyler Perry Speaks On Cutting Ties With His Relatives

The complex financial dynamics revealed in the surfaced text messages with Rodriguez seemed to mirror a larger pattern in Perry’s personal life. According to The Blast, Perry opened up about the difficult decisions he has had to make regarding his own relatives. 

He admitted that his massive success brought forth expectations from family members that he eventually found impossible to meet without compromising his own values. Perry shared that he has had to cut off certain relatives to avoid being treated as a perpetual source of income. 

He recounted a specific instance where a family member became angry after he refused a request for a million dollars, explaining that support should empower people rather than enable them.