By Chris Snellgrove
| Published 35 seconds ago

Even after all these years, Hugh Jackman is arguably still the biggest Marvel star: after all, his performance as Wolverine was so iconic that the mutant was brought (kicking and screaming, no less) into the MCU with Deadpool & Wolverine. Longtime comics fans were particularly excited for these films because the Marvel Cinematic Universe was once forbidden from using X-Men characters. As cool as it was to see the Avengers assemble onscreen, many of us were sad that everyone’s favorite band of merry mutants couldn’t join them

Disney’s acquisition of 20th Century Fox finally made that crossover popular, and we’re going to see the rest of the X-Men join the MCU in the upcoming film Avengers: Doomsday. It’s a movie that execs like Kevin Feige have presented as a bold new take on the world of superhero cinema, but this film isn’t as innovative as they imagine. After all, Hugh Jackman basically predicted Avengers: Doomsday 13 years ago!

The Mutant Who Knew Too Much

Back then, Jackman was promoting a different Marvel movie altogether: The Wolverine, the surprisingly solid sequel to the disappointing X-Men Origins: Wolverine. This was way before Disney acquired 20th Century Fox, so there was no way for his beloved character to pop up in the MCU. However, The Avengers had premiered just one year before, and many could now see the potential of ambitious onscreen team-ups between different kinds of heroes.

This included Hugh Jackman. In a recently resurfaced promotional clip for The Wolverine, he discussed how he’s “maybe…optimistic” that Marvel, which has “a lot of big things going on,” couldn’t find some way to bring the characters owned by different studios into one film. “I find it almost impossible that there’s not a way [to take] Iron Man, all the Avengers characters, Wolverine, the X-Men characters, Spider-Man, and somehow get them in all together,” he said.

Now that the movie is set to premiere later this year, many Marvel fans are amazed that Hugh Jackman essentially predicted Avengers: Doomsday 13 years ago. So far, we know that this movie will feature the Avengers, the X-Men, Spider-Man, and Iron Man (or at least, Doomsday wearing Iron Man’s face). While he hasn’t yet confirmed he will be in it, many assume that Jackman’s Wolverine will make an appearance, especially after Deadpool & Wolverine made him part of the MCU and prominently joked about how the actor would be playing the same character for many years to come.

Finally Giving The Fans What They Want

If nothing else, Jackman gets points for knowing exactly what his audience wants to see onscreen. In that same interview, he said, “I’m totally in” for such a crossover “because that would be really exciting for fans across the board.” This is, of course, what Kevin Feige is hoping for: that the sheer excitement of seeing all these different characters onscreen will be enough to overcome the superhero fatigue that is threatening to destroy the MCU altogether.

Fans of Hugh Jackman are busy giving the mutant actor his props for predicting the biggest superhero film ever made over 13 years before its release date. Cynics, however, claim that he merely stated the obvious and that every Marvel fan worth their salt has wanted all these characters onscreen together since the beginning. But there’s one thing that both these groups can agree on: that the success or failure of Avengers: Doomsday will determine whether these epic team-ups are the new norm or just one last bit of “maximum effort” before the tights-and-flights genre finally flies off into the sunset.

Conan O’Brien Says He Reaches More People With His Podcast

He Says The Talk Show Genre Won’t Last Long

O’Brien’s Comments Come Amid Multiple Talk Show Cancellations

The Former Late-Night TV Host Will Appear In ‘Toy Story 5’

The Oscars Will Air On March 15

Gerry Turner
Scores New $1M Pad With Fiancée Lana Sutton

Published
February 23, 2026
5:14 PM PST

Diamond Brown‘s latest social media post has some internet users thinking that she has more tea to spill about Chris Brown.

RELATED: Oop! Some Social Media Users Speculate If Diamond Brown May Have Revealed The Gender Of Chris Brown’s Alleged “Baby On The Way”

More On Diamond Brown’s Latest Social Media Post

On Sunday, February 22, Diamond Brown took to TikTok to share a clip with her more than 64,000 followers. Furthermore, Diamond dropped an on-screen caption, which read, “The voices in my head deciding if I want to do it for the plot or have standards.”

Additionally, the clip showed her seemingly debating each option as the vocals of two women went back and forth — one saying “Hell naw” and the other saying “Hell yeah” — played.

“#doitforthelpot?” Diamond captioned the video.

Peep the clip below.

@diamondbrownn

#doitforthelpot?

♬ Corjha x Jayla – 2FunnyLives

Internet Users Think She Has More Tea To Spill About Chris Brown

Internet users immediately hopped into Diamond Brown’s comment section. Many were convinced that her clip meant that she has more tea to spill on Chris Brown.

TikTok user @J🌹 wrote, “Everyone hyping her up in the comments so she gives us more tea is hilarious 😂 tell it all girl”

While TikTok user @Lisbsl .56 added, “You‘re the BEST one!!! Love her downnnn”

While TikTok user @Mammajamma added, “Chris is in competition with Nick Cannon but I would be like Mariah ‘I don’t know her’ 😂”

TikTok user @liv wrote, “This your show now baby! We team Diamond!! 💎 💅”

While TikTok user @TequilaW added, “The plot my girl always for the plot 😭😭”

TikTok user @YERDUA 🪼 wrote, “Girrrrl leave my man alone!!!”

More On Diamond Brown & Chris Brown Recently Turning Heads On Social Media

As The Shade Room previously reported, last week, Diamond Brown turned heads when she called Chris Brown out, telling him to leave her alone. Additionally, she alleged that he has a “new baby on the way.”

Subsequently, Diamond alleged that Chris has been attempting to ruin her new romantic relationships. Therefore, she has no problem “airing” his business out.

Furthermore, Diamond even appeared to reveal the gender of all his alleged forthcoming child, per The Shade Room. This, before Jada Wallace, Chris’ rumored girlfriend, shared spicy words for Diamond. In part, Wallace alleged that Diamond has been keeping Chris’s daughter, Lovely, from him and even dating some of Chris’s friends.

In response, Diamond clapped back, denying Wallace’s claims while noting her plans to “whoop” Wallace.

Chris only weighed in by saying that he isn’t playing “internet games.”

Since then, Wallace shared a cryptic final word, while Chris has seemingly noted his plans to get back to work.

Most recently, Chris shared a message about “a lot” being on his plate. But he added that “manifesting” is his “superpower.”

RELATED: Back To Work! Chris Brown Shares Message For Fans Following Viral Blow-Up Between Diamond Brown & Jada Wallace

Demi Lovato Speaks On Rivalries Between ‘Camp Rock’ And ‘High School Musical’ Casts

Demi Lovato Is Returning To Disney For ‘Camp Rock 3,’ But Not In The Way Some Watchers Might Expect

Will Demi Lovato At Least Make A Cameo In The Upcoming ‘Camp Rock’ Movie?

‘High School Musical’ Stars Revisit The Franchise After 20 Years

Awards shows have always walked a tightrope between spectacle and control. The recent BAFTA Awards broadcast controversy, however, shows what happens when that balance slips, and why networks heading into Oscars season should be paying very close attention.

What unfolded during the ceremony exposed something structural about modern awards telecasts: when editorial standards appear uneven, even unintentionally, the broadcast itself becomes the story. At a time when these shows are already under intense scrutiny, consistency isn’t just a technical goal — it’s the foundation of viewer trust.

The Slur Airing Raises Questions About Broadcast Safeguards

Image via BAFTAs 2026

The most immediate backlash followed the BBC’s delayed airing of the BAFTAs, during which a racial slur shouted by an audience member remained in the final broadcast. The outburst came from Tourette’s advocate John Davidson, whose condition can include involuntary vocal tics. Host Alan Cumming had warned viewers during the ceremony that such language could occur and stressed that the symptoms were not intentional.

The BBC later apologized, saying the moment should have been removed before transmission. Producers reportedly did not hear the slur while monitoring the feed from the production truck, even though other instances of strong language were successfully edited out. From a broadcast perspective, the issue isn’t about Davidson’s intent. According to accounts, the outburst was involuntary. The larger question is procedural: If a two-hour delay exists specifically to catch unpredictable moments, how did something this significant slip through?

Tape delays are built on a simple promise — that there is a safety net. When that net visibly fails, even once, it invites scrutiny about how reliable the system really is, and in an awards-show environment, perception matters almost as much as process. There was real damage done with that slur slipping through, prompting responses from award winners. Oscar-winning Sinners production designer Hannah Beachler described the situation as “almost impossible,” but said the impact on Black attendees was real, noting that racial slurs were heard multiple times that night, including one directed at her after the ceremony. What appeared to frustrate some in the room even more was the response that followed. Beachler specifically criticized what she characterized as a “throw-away apology of ‘if you were offended,’” a line that highlighted how quickly a technical broadcast issue can evolve into a broader credibility problem.

Cutting Political Speech Creates a Perception Problem

The conversation might have remained narrowly focused on a missed edit if not for what viewers noticed next. Filmmaker Akinola Davies Jr.’s acceptance speech, which concluded with a brief political statement referencing Palestine, was removed from the BBC broadcast. To be clear, the BAFTAs telecast is routinely trimmed for time, and political remarks are not immune to those edits, but a racial slur left audible while a clearly delivered political line was cut became part of the public debate.

Even if the two decisions were made for entirely separate reasons, the contrast created the appearance of selective enforcement, and on broadcast television, appearances can be just as consequential as intent. This isn’t fundamentally a question about whether political speech belongs in awards shows; networks have long exercised editorial judgment over what makes the final cut. The complication arises when audiences can’t easily see the logic behind those decisions. Neutrality depends on consistency; when viewers perceive uneven application of standards, the editorial process itself starts to look subjective, whether it is or not.

Why the Oscars and Other Telecasts Should Pay Attention

Image via Shutterstock/Featureflash Photo Agency

If there’s a forward-looking takeaway from the BAFTAs situation, it’s this: the margin for editorial ambiguity is shrinking. Modern awards shows are global, heavily clipped, and instantly dissected online. Every bleep, every cut, every missed moment now travels far beyond the original broadcast window, which raises the stakes for clarity around how decisions are made.

For major telecasts like the Oscars, the lesson isn’t about avoiding every possible misstep — that’s unrealistic in live-event television. The real priority is transparency and consistency. Viewers are generally forgiving of honest mistakes. They are far less forgiving when the rules behind the broadcast feel opaque.

That means clearly defined delay protocols, consistent editing standards, and faster visible corrections when something slips through. Without those guardrails, even routine editorial choices risk becoming flashpoints. Awards shows thrive when the focus stays on the winners, the speeches, and the spectacle. When the conversation shifts to broadcast decisions instead, credibility starts to erode at the edges.

For broadcasters heading into the Oscars and beyond, this controversy offers a useful — and timely — reminder. Viewers don’t expect perfection; they do, however, expect the rules to make sense, and when they stop making sense, trust has a way of slipping out of frame until it’s nonexistent.

Zachery Ty Bryan
Sentenced to Over A Year in jail for DUI

Published
February 23, 2026
4:02 PM PST

Minnesota Vikings wide receiver and former Purdue standout Rondale Moore’s cause of death has been released.

Moore died by suicide on Saturday, February 21, New Albany police Chief Todd Bailey told Us Weekly on Monday, February 23.

“Due to consideration for Moore’s family we are not releasing specific case information,” Bailey added. 

Moore was found dead in his New Albany, Indiana, home on Saturday. 

A native of New Albany, Moore was in the process of working his way back onto the field after suffering a season-ending injury during a Vikings preseason game in August 2025. 

“I am devastated by the news of Rondale’s death,” Vikings head coach Kevin O’Connell said in a statement. “While Rondale had been a member of the Vikings for a short time, he was someone we came to know well and care about deeply. He was a humble, soft-spoken, and respectful young man who was proud of his Indiana roots.”

O’Connell, 40, added, “As a player, he was disciplined, dedicated and resilient despite facing adversity multiple times as injuries sidelined him throughout his career. We are all heartbroken by the fact he won’t continue to live out his NFL dream, and we won’t all have a chance to watch him flourish. My prayers are with Rondale’s family, friends, teammates and coaches as we all deal with this tragic news.”

Moore signed with the Vikings during the 2025 offseason. He was forced to miss the entire 2024 season after suffering a dislocated right knee during his tenure with the Atlanta Falcons.

Prior to his NFL career, Moore was a star with the Purdue Boilermakers. At the end of his freshman season in 2018, he was the recipient of the Paul Hornung Award, presented to the most versatile player in all of college football.

Though his sophomore and junior years were hampered by injuries, his lasting impact in West Lafayette was undeniable. 

“Rondale Moore was a complete joy to coach,” said Jeff Brohm, Moore’s head coach at Purdue. “The ultimate competitor that would never back down to any challenge. Rondale has a work ethic that was unmatched by anyone. A great teammate that would come through in any situation.”

Brohm, 54, continued, “We all loved Rondale and we loved his smile and competitive edge that always wanted to please everyone he came in contact with. We offer all of our thoughts and prayers to Rondale and his family, and we love him very much!!!”

The NFL community remembered Moore after his sudden death, including his former Cardinals quarterback Kyler Murray. 

“Just spoke to you bro,” Murray, 28,  shared via his Instagram Story. “Blessed to have been able to share this life with you. I pray you’re in a better place now Ra…🕊️.”

J.J. Watt, Moore’s former teammate in Arizona, wrote via X, “Can’t even begin to fathom or process this. There’s just no way. Way too soon. Way too special. So much left to give. Rest in Peace Rondale.

If you or someone you know is struggling or in crisis, help is available. Call or text 988 or chat at 988lifeline.org.