After swift online backlash, fans are learning why James Van Der Beek and Eric Dane were not honored during the 2026 Oscars In Memoriam.

A source tells Us Weekly that the Academy “receives hundreds of requests to include loved ones and industry colleagues” to be featured during the emotional segment. To narrow down the many requests, an “executive committee” is formed with members that represent every branch of the Academy.

The insider explains that those committee members review the list and make “recommendations for the telecast based on limited available time.”

For those who do not get a spotlighted moment during the live awards show, their names do appear on the Oscars’ website. All of the submissions are included on the site, where they remain for the duration of the year.

Related: Fans React to 2026 Oscars In Memoriam Segment Snubs: Eric Dane and More

The annual In Memoriam segment at the 2026 Oscars took time to remember those in the film industry who died in the past year. And while actors from Robert Redford and Diane Keaton to Catherine O’Hara and Rick Reiner received recognition, fans were not happy with some notable omissions. Chief among them were Eric Dane […]

Us has reached out to the Academy for comment.

On Sunday, March 15, Van Der Beek and Dane were noticeably missing from the award show’s tribute to those who have died in the past year. Both actors are, however, featured on the website’s tribute page.

Fans expressed their disappointment online after noticing that both actors were excluded from the In Memoriam.

“I know every year, the Oscars leaves out a few people who passed away. But these 3 were so recent,” one user wrote via X. “I’m sad they left out James Van Der Beek, Eric Dane, and Robert Carradine. RIP.”

Both Dane and Van Der Beek died weeks before the Academy Awards were held at the Dolby Theatre in Los Angeles. Van Der Beek died in February after a battle with colorectal cancer. The Dawson’s Creek alum was 48.

“Our beloved James David Van Der Beek passed peacefully this morning,” James’ wife, Kimberly Van Der Beek, wrote via Instagram at the time. “He met his final days with courage, faith and grace. There is much to share regarding his wishes, love for humanity and the sacredness of time. Those days will come. For now we ask for peaceful privacy as we grieve our loving husband, father, son, brother and friend.”

James is survived by Kimberly, 43 and their six children, Olivia, 15, Joshua, 14, Annabel, 12, Emilia, 9, Gwendolyn, 7, and Jeremiah, 4.

Nearly a week later, Dane died following his battle with ALS. The Grey’s Anatomy alum was 53.

Related: Which Celebrities Were Left Out of the 2026 Oscars In Memoriam Segment?

The 2026 Oscars had an emotional In Memoriam segment that noticeably missed several celebrities. During the awards show on Sunday, March 15, Rob Reiner, his wife, Michele Singer Reiner, Robert Redford and Diane Keaton were some film industry members who received lengthy tributes from their former costars. Catherine O’Hara was also mentioned in a heart-wrenching […]

Advertisement

“With heavy hearts, we share that Eric Dane passed on Thursday afternoon following a courageous battle with ALS,” his family said in a statement to Us at the time. “He spent his final days surrounded by dear friends, his devoted wife and his two beautiful daughters, Billie and Georgia, who were the center of his world.”

The statement continued, “Throughout his journey with ALS, Eric became a passionate advocate for awareness and research, determined to make a difference for others facing the same fight. He will be deeply missed and lovingly remembered always. Eric adored his fans and is forever grateful for the outpouring of love and support he’s received. The family has asked for privacy as they navigate this impossible time.”

Dane is survived by Rebecca Gayheart, who withdrew her 2018 divorce filing in 2025 following the actor’s ALS diagnosis, and their daughters, Billie, 16, and Georgia, 14.

In Jessica Alba‘s universe, her timing is the only perfect one!

The talented actress attended the Vanity Fair Oscar Party without company despite her ongoing sensational romance with her boyfriend, Danny Ramirez.

Jessica Alba and Danny Ramirez were first linked romantically in May 2025, sharing a kiss in London, and their relationship became red-carpet and Instagram official towards the end of the year.

Jessica Alba And Her Younger Boo Color-Coordinated At The Oscars

While they did not arrive together for the event, the actress and her Ramirez still left hints that all was well in paradise by leaving the event together in matching black outfits. Alba arrived at the Los Angeles County Museum of Art for the party in a dramatic sequin gown paired with Alexandre Birman Clarita Bell Slingback 100 Satin Black shoes.

The screen goddess’s elaborate gown also featured a plunging neckline and feathery details at the base. She paired the look with a middle-parted, wavy look, minimal accessories, and a softly made-up face as she walked closely beside her boyfriend.

Ramirez reportedly made a low-key entrance into the venue much later in an all-black ensemble to match her glamorous outfit. As shared by The Daily Mail, Alba’s relationship with Ramirez marks her first-ever public romance since filing for divorce from her husband of nearly two decades, Cash Warren, early last year. 

The ‘Honey’ Actress’s Boyfriend Flaunted Their Romance On Instagram Last Year

Last November, Ramirez took the bull by the horns and confirmed what everyone has been hush about by uploading pictures of their recent outing at the “Baby2Baby” event on his Instagram. He shared a cute selfie picture of the two of them, with Alba’s hand wrapped around his neck while flaunting her stunning serpentine silver neckpiece.

The new couple was all smiles as they posed with some other attendees at the ceremony. Ramirez’s hard launch was received with incredible enthusiasm from fans who commented on adorable things about the duo.

Alba herself moved like the number one fan of her new couple by leaving a love and heart sign emoji. Actresses Maude Apatow, Rachel Zegler, and a few other admirers of the couple did not mince words in affirming that they accept the new man in Alba’s life with their heart and soul.

Jessica Alba’s Ex-Husband Was Spotted In The Company Of A Younger Beauty

The actress’s estranged husband also made a statement with his relationship status late last year when he was spotted out and about with a new partner, Hana Sun Doerr, a 25-year-old model in Beverly Hills.

Warren and his rumored new flame held hands as they walked around a celebrity romantic hot spot in E Baldi. The Blast stated that the actress’s ex has put it on record that he was happy for her to find love with Ramirez, who seems like a really good guy.

Advertisement

As for Alba and Warren, the couple drew the curtain on their divorce process on March 16, 2026, when a judge signed off on their settlement, which involved equal division of community property and a multimillion-dollar payout from Alba to Warren.

Alba And Her Ex Tried Therapy To Salvage Their Failed Union

Alan and Warren welcomed three children together while they were married, and when trust issues began to create a crack in the marriage, the couple turned to therapy.

The Blast shared that a source close to the couple claimed there was little therapy done to save the collapsing ship, and at the time of their split, they cited irreconcilable differences as the culprit. “There were trust issues in the past, which led to many arguments. The marriage ran its course. Their communication hadn’t been great,” a source had shared about the couple.

On the road to finalizing their divorce, the couple reportedly agreed not to pay spousal support. As for the payout from Alba to Warren, which totaled $3 million, the actress promised to make the payment in two non-taxable installments. The first would be a $1.5 million payment now, and the remaining half in 2027.

Jessica Alba’s Blast From The Past Broke Down The Nature Of Their Romance

The Honest Company co-founder was formerly involved with Kristen Bell’s current husband, Dax Shepard, who reflected on their past relationship during a March 7 episode of his podcast. 

Shepherd admitted that people acknowledging previous relationships with him now makes him proud, compared to two decades ago, when he went on several dates with Alba and did not want her to tell the world what they had going on back then.

Advertisement

Then they reunited on a 2017 Netflix comedy project where Alba indeed blew the covers off their secret romance by telling him across the room, reminding him about the times they used to make out. Shepard claimed that the statement truly shocked him because he was so sure Alba would not let anyone into her personal business.

Will Jessica Alba and Danny Ramirez keep this current arrangement in their public outings?

There’s a case to be made for Paul Feig‘s The Housemaid being the biggest box-office surprise of 2025. Released just before Christmas as an alternative to Avatar: Fire and Ash (which, notably, underperformed relative to expectations), the erotic psychological thriller proved to be a monumental sleeper hit, grossing just shy of $400 million against a $35 million budget.

Sydney Sweeney, Amanda Seyfried and Brandon Sklenar star in the picture based on Freida McFadden‘s book about a pretty young ex-con who takes a job as a live-in house cleaner for a yuppie New York family harboring wild, dark secrets. Now available on digital platforms as well as a Blu-ray packed with bonus features including two commentary tracks and deleted scenes, The Housemaid is fairly ridiculous, especially in its final act, but it’s propped up by its impossibly attractive leading cast and a ripper of a performance from Seyfried. Its runaway, attention-grabbing success makes one wonder if, perhaps, the steamy thriller subgenre might be making a comeback. The following erotic thrillers, aimed squarely at adult audiences, are likely to appeal to you if you’re among those who’ve made The Housemaid such an astonishing financial success.

‘Wild Things’ (1998)

Director John McNaughton has received critical praise and controversy in about equal measure throughout his career, originally and most famously regarding his 1986 chiller Henry: Portrait of a Serial Killer, a groundbreaking picture about what kinds of minds and social connections could be behind murder. It’s a brilliant, disturbing look at a topic that’s usually dumbed down and glossy in fiction. Henry: Portrait of a Serial Killer was in a much-publicized push-pull with the MPAA before eventually getting released in multiple cuts.

Wild Things is similarly infamous, one of the most sexually explicit proper Hollywood movies of its era. Matt Dillon, Kevin Bacon, Neve Campbell and Denise Richards are all terrific in a darkly funny noir thriller about an uncomfortably hot Florida guidance counselor who’s accused of rape by two of his students, one who lives in a trailer park and one of whom is local yuppie royalty. Nothing is as it seems, and where The Housemaid hinges on one major plot twist, Wild Things is defined by too many to count. Bill Murray is hilarious here as a skeezy lawyer who’s never without his prop neck brace. This subject matter, especially involving high school students, is undeniably edgy even by today’s standards—on paper, it may seem outright tasteless—but Wild Things is a shrewd, character-focused balancing act that’s designed purely to surprise and entertain, succeeding handsomely.

‘Cruel Intentions’ (1999)

The classic French novel Dangerous Liaisons has served as the basis for many memorable adaptations (most recently, an international series on HBO Max mere months ago), but the most ubiquitous throughout pop culture at this point is likely this teen romance starring a who’s who of young Hollywood at the dawn of the new millennium. Ryan Phillippe, Sarah Michelle Gellar, Reese Witherspoon and Selma Blair headline a drama about horny, bored rich New York teens who plan seductions and conquests to entertain themselves.

Cruel Intentions is darkly comedic navel-gazing, but it works surprisingly well thanks to excellent performances all around, and an unusual, appealing mixture of cynicism and earnestness that can’t be bottled. This bona fide cult classic has received numerous direct-to-video sequels and a TV reboot. All of these failed miserably to capture the alchemy that’s made Cruel Intentions endure, so it’s best if the follow-ups stop. Just stop.

‘Color of Night’ (1994)

I’m about to recommend a terrible movie to you. The erotic thriller subgenre reached its absolute zenith in popularity and exposure in the early ’90s, and many of these movies were terrible. Psycho slasher Color of Night is terrible in a way that’s fascinating, a trainwreck that’s come to be embraced by audiences. Bruce Willis stars as a psychologist, traumatized following a client’s suicide, who starts attending a group therapy where bodies begin piling up.

Color of Night received a lot of controversy, and an NC-17 rating, due to extensive nude scenes between Willis and co-star Jane March. It’s a riotously inaccurate depiction of mental health struggles and treatment, and the big twist is so obvious it’s quite literally in front of your eyes the entire running time. Roger Ebert summed it up pretty perfectly in saying the film approaches badness from so many directions that one really must admire its imagination.” There’s never a dull moment. It’s like Agatha Christie by way of softcore, shot like an Italian giallo. It’s an experience.

‘Eyes Wide Shut’ (1999)

Eyes Wide Shut and The Housemaid are alike in some ways, and couldn’t be more different in others. They’re both high-profile, uncommonly sex-driven studio films featuring A-list cast members. But where The Housemaid is content to be pulpy, frothy and ultimately rather mindless fun, Eyes Wide Shut is the magnum opus of a master, and designed to stay in your head forever.

With a production period of around 400 days, Eyes Wide Shut still holds the record for longest film shoot in history. Tom Cruise and Nicole Kidman star in Stanley Kubrick‘s final film, about a rich New York doctor struggling in marriage who goes down a rabbit hole of elitist depravity one Christmas season night. Eyes Wide shut is so slow-paced that many are likely to dismiss it as boring, but it’s an extraordinary, oddly terrifying slow-burn that’s more relevant than ever now that society at large has been made aware of just how abhorrent the sex practices of the hyper-rich can be in reality.

‘Dressed to Kill’ (1980)

An overt student of Hitchcock and a New Hollywood innovator in his own right, Brian De Palma is one of the undisputed masters of the erotic thriller genre. Though other films like Body Double and Femme Fatale are definitely worth checking out as well, the De Palma film that’s most in line with The Housemaid is 1980’s Dressed to Kill, a slasher mystery with wall-to-wall Hitchcock references, most notably Psycho with plenty of Vertigo accents.

Angie Dickinson stars as a bored and sexually frustrated housewife who vents about her displeasure to a psychotherapist played by Michael Caine. Nancy Allen co-stars as a call girl who’s the prime suspect in a murder she didn’t commit. Dressed to Kill is visually arresting in the way that the best Brian De Palma outfits are, with a beautiful Pino Donaggio score that evokes Bernard Herrmann. It’s politically incorrect or whatever by today’s standards, but in a fun way. This isn’t a De Palma masterpiece like Carrie, Scarface, or The Untouchables, but it’s a twisted pleasure that holds up nearly half a century later.

‘The Housemaid’ is now available on digital platforms, and hits Blu-ray March 17.

Advertisement

The Housemaid

Advertisement

Release Date

Advertisement

December 19, 2025

Runtime

131 Minutes

Advertisement

Director

Paul Feig

Writers

Advertisement

Rebecca Sonnenshine, Freida McFadden

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

In early March, Vladimir was released on Netflix, and since then, this eight-episode dark comedy-drama has become one of the streamer’s most talked-about word-of-mouth hits. This series features brilliant performances by Rachel Weisz and Leo Woodall as it weaves together themes of campus satire, psychological drama, and unreliable narration into something both unsettling yet oddly amusing.

Vladimir was adapted by Julia May Jonas from her own novel. This series is less a traditional romance than it is an exploration of the many facets of obsession, the exercise and limitations of power, and the bizarre locations and scenarios where creativity can flourish. What begins as a scandal-ridden campus drama slowly morphs into a twisted character study about fantasy versus reality — and by the time the final episode arrives, the story reveals a darkly comic twist that reframes everything that came before.

‘Vladimir’ Turns Academic Scandal Into a Darkly Funny Obsession

Image via Netflix

At the center of Vladimir is an unnamed literature professor, played with biting wit by Weisz. She’s tenured, respected, and used to commanding a certain level of attention — until her life begins unraveling almost all at once. As the scandal unfolds across campus involving the protagonist’s husband (John Slattery) and multiple past students accusing him of inappropriate relations, the protagonist struggles to keep her professional and personal lives from becoming out of control. Then Vladimir (Woodall) arrives.

Woodall plays the charming young novelist newly hired by the English department, and his presence disrupts the protagonist’s carefully constructed world almost immediately. Their flirtation begins innocently enough — a conversation about literature, a shared drink — but it soon spirals into something far more complicated. Much of the series unfolds inside the protagonist’s head as she narrates directly to the audience, confessing fantasies about Vladimir while attempting to rationalize her husband’s behavior and her own growing obsession.

This type of setup allows the show to blend sharp satire and awkward humor, which allows the show to create a context that highlights the sometimes-challenging faculty issues, the often unclear moral boundaries that exist between faculty members and students, as well as the fact that many of the characters act in ways that have many moral implications. The actors and characters use their respective skill sets to gain greater authority by exploiting the fragile power dynamics within academia.

Rachel Weisz Delivers One of the Year’s Most Compelling Performances

Image via Netflix

Much of Vladimir works because of Weisz’s performance. She plays the protagonist as both sharply intelligent and quietly unraveling, a woman who believes she understands the world — only to discover that the rules have changed around her.

Generational conflict is an important theme in the series as well, with the older professors rationalizing things for the sake of younger students and the protagonist hearing how things were done in the past compared to the present day. Thus, as expectations within academia have changed, she experiences increasing tension with her previous beliefs.

At the same time, the story never pretends its characters are particularly heroic. In fact, Vladimir seems almost determined to show how self-interested everyone can be. Affairs, academic rivalries, professional jealousy, and quiet manipulations all collide in ways that leave nearly every character morally compromised. That’s part of the appeal, though. Rather than offering easy answers, the series revels in ambiguity — both in its characters and in the events unfolding.

Related

Yes, Chef! An All-You-Can-Eat Buffet About The Bear — The Collider TV Quiz

Pi Day was Saturday (3/14), but instead of testing your pie knowledge, we’re going to go a different culinary route. How much of a Bear Buff are you?

Advertisement

The ‘Vladimir’ Finale’s Twist Reveals the Story Was Never What It Seemed

Image via Netflix

From the very first episode, Vladimir hints that something strange is coming. The opening scene shows Vladimir tied to a chair in a remote cabin, confused and barely conscious, before the story rewinds weeks to explain how everything led to that moment. By the time the finale circles back to the cabin, the truth is even more unsettling than viewers might expect.

The protagonist, Weisz’s character, drugs Vladimir and restrains him under the guise of a strange sexual misunderstanding, after convincing him that the two men in their orbit — Vladimir and John — have betrayed each other. Afterward, the relationships between characters fall apart, illustrating that most of what has taken place stems from the protagonist’s desire for power and to provide inspiration. Then the final darkly funny revelation occurs: all of this will eventually be part of the novel that she is trying very hard to write.

After finally fulfilling her fantasy with Vladimir — and the experience turns out to be much less than she had expected — the protagonist learns that the true reward was not in having a romantic experience but rather a creative one. The obsession that had almost caused her to destroy herself in her personal life was actually the catalyst that would bring her creativity back.

The series ends with another moment of unease. A fire breaks out at the cabin; rather than rushing to rescue the men who are trapped, she rushes to save her manuscript. Nobody actually knows whether they survive, leaving the audience to determine how much of the finale is truth and how much is just another part of the larger story. This was a bold way to end things and a perfect way to show what Vladimir was about all along: the ambiguity of the relationship between reality, fantasy, and the stories we tell ourselves.

By the time the credits roll, the show reveals itself as both a biting satire of academic culture and a sly commentary on writers who mine their own lives — and the lives of others — for inspiration. And in that sense, the most shocking twist of all might be how unapologetically the protagonist chooses herself over everything else.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Release Date

March 5, 2026

Network

Advertisement

Netflix

Writers

Julia May Jonas

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Hollywood’s A-listers always bring the heat to the Academy Awards.

While winning a gold statue is the main goal at the Oscars, stars are also set on slaying the red carpet. Although some have played it safe, other celebs show up to the Oscars in the sexiest, most skin-baring dresses, suits and gowns the fashion world has to offer.

For starters, Angelina Jolie commanded attention in her black strapless Atelier Versace gown at the 2012 show. The strapless getup was the talk of the night, and to add even more drama to the ensemble, she wore a bright red lip and stilettos.

Then in 2026, Zoe Saldaña gave fans a glimpse of her figure in a fitted black Saint Laurent dress finished with a see-through lace bodice.

Without further ado, look through the all-time sexiest Oscars red carpet fashion moments from years past:

When it comes to guys like Stephen King, film and TV adaptations are a dime a dozen. It might be hard to believe, but for every novel or short story that the king of horror has churned out, a ridiculous number of screen iterations have followed in their wake. This is for good reason, too. King basically prints money. There are the groundbreaking It adaptations (from the films to the latest Welcome to Derry series), several Carrie movies, a few Shining-related projects (some better than others), and the endlessly resurrected Pet Sematary franchise. Still, many corners haven’t quite gotten their due.

Some have gotten close with projects like The Stand or the Dark Tower series, only to end up with a few TV miniseries or atrocious big-screen adaptations. Those properties at least have the excuse of maybe being too big for their britches. You know what story doesn’t have any excuse? Salem’s Lot. Tobe Hooper‘s 1979 two-part TV movie is the best of the bunch. It’s perfectly charming for what it is, but it doesn’t quite tap into the chilling nature of King’s sophomore novel. Meanwhile, after years of development, King fans were stoked for the long-awaited Salem’s Lot adaptation in 2024. But the long-delayed adaptation for HBO Max didn’t exactly land the way many hoped. Director Gary Dauberman‘s take on King’s vampire classic received poor reviews and a rough 42% Rotten Tomatoes score, leaving fans once again wishing for a definitive screen version of the novel.

But weirdly enough, the closest that anyone has come to achieving that true Salem’s Lot level of scares would have to be 2021’s Chapelwaite. While it’s not exactly Salem’s Lot proper, it is based on a short story prequel titled “Jerusalem’s Lot,” included in the author’s short story collection, Night Shift. Chapelwaite might not sound like the Salem’s Lot screen fix that you’re looking for, but its Gothic, 19th-century setting, slow-burn dread, and fantastic Adrien Brody performance at the center make this one of the most underrated King adaptations to date.

‘Chapelwaite’ Is the Better, More Underrated ‘Salem’s Lot’ Prequel

It’s more than likely that you’re unfamiliar with the little-seen 2021 miniseries Chapelwaite. Don’t feel bad — many are. This show premiered in August 2021 on Epix and aired all 10 episodes leading up to Halloween, only to quietly and quickly fade into obscurity. It’s an unfortunate fate, considering the series clearly could have continued for more than its sole season.

But what is Chapelwaite actually about? It’s not Salem’s Lot proper, so what exactly is this series? Well, first off, it takes place over 100 years before its better-known counterpart. The series follows Charles Boone (Brody), who moves home after the death of his wife, and moves with his family to their small hometown in Maine. Unbeknownst to them, this is where vampires (and more — featuring worm babies?!) lurk. So yeah, it’s Salem’s Lot but with a 19th-century Gothic horror flair. There’s not much about Chapelwaite that feels wholly hallmark “King.” You don’t get that classic 20th-century Americana, kids on bikes, or the seedy side of our everyday life. This is like diving into a Dracula series; it just happens to take place in North America and, more specifically, the same world as Lot.

In short, Chapelwaite rocks. It’s full of fantastic performances, whether in the form of a criminally underrated Brody role or supporting figures like Emily Hampshire and Julian Richings. You can’t overlook its atmosphere either. This series is the spooky fix that old-school horror fans everywhere are looking for. Every frame is coated in fog, everybody and everything is covered in dirt and grime, and the sun is hardly anywhere to be found. And hey, for more bloodthirsty horror fans, there’s a hefty dose of gore to be found here and there. This old school Lot has something for everyone!

‘Chapelwaite’ Is Based on Stephen King’s Prequel Story “Jerusalem’s Lot”

For most, Chapelwaite will sound like a random addition to Stephen King’s world, but it’s pulled straight from the man himself. This series is based on a short story titled “Jerusalem’s Lot” from his 1978 collection, Night Shift. In it, King throws on his best Bram Stoker Halloween costume and takes on a full Dracula-esque framework. Like Chapelwaite, Jerusalem’s Lot tells the story of Charles Boone, but instead of telling it in a conventional narrative, the story is told through journal entries and letters.

It also shows a different side to King’s vampire universe. Like its 2021 television counterpart, Jerusalem’s Lot takes time to creep readers out almost exclusively with atmosphere. King is often noted by his critics as an author who aims for cheap scares and shocking gore. Real fans know this man is a much more multifaceted author than these haters give him credit for. He’s written some of the most famous dramas of his time, including Rita Hayworth, Shawshank Redemption, and The Body (you know, Stand By Me).

Related

The 10 Best Stephen King TV Shows, Ranked

Something’s hiding in that small town.

Advertisement

There’s no doubt that he knows how to kill some suckers in some pretty gruesome ways, but King’s truest knack is for creating a killer vibe and writing incredibly memorable characters. Given that “Jerusalem’s Lot” is a short prequel to a pretty rich novel, Charles Boone doesn’t necessarily have to be the most memorable character in the world for the story to work. This thing is a treat for anyone and everyone looking for that old-school vampire horror vibe topped off with a little King flair.

Chapelwaite is now available to watch on MGM+ in the U.S.

Advertisement

Release Date

2021 – 2021-00-00

Advertisement

Showrunner

Jason Filardi

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Barbra Streisand is reportedly considering quitting live performances.

The octogenarian took the stage at the 2026 Oscars as part of a special tribute to her longtime friend Robert Redford, who died in September at the age of 89.

However, the performance reportedly sparked a wave of criticism online, which is said to be behind Barbra Streisand’s alleged decision.

Barbra Streisand Knows Her Voice Isn’t What It Once Was

The 2026 Oscar Awards included a special segment dedicated to a tribute to Robert Redford, who passed away last year.

As part of the tribute, Streisand, who starred with the actor in “The Way We Were,” delivered a very personal speech and sang the iconic song associated with their 1973 film.

But to her surprise, the performance drew a wave of criticism from several netizens, many of whom claimed that her voice wasn’t what it used to be.

According to a source who spoke with Rob Shuter’s #ShuterScoop, the narrative has now pushed Streisand to begin considering quitting live performances, even though she was not fazed by the criticism.

“Babs doesn’t care what people say about her,” one insider said, explaining the decision to the outlet. “She never has.”

“She watched the performance, listened to the recording, and she knows the voice isn’t what it once was,” the source says.

The Singer Feels She Has Nothing Left To Prove

Speaking further about Streisand, the source claimed that the EGOT winner refuses to be driven by the potential money she could make by continuing to perform with fading vocals, unlike many other aging stars.

“Barbra will never go out there just to collect a paycheck,” said the source. “She doesn’t need the money, and she has nothing left to prove.”

For the actress, she believes it would be best for people to remember how good she once was, rather than watch the legacy she has built fall apart as her singing voice declines with age.

“She would rather be remembered at her best,” continued the source. “Not compared to a version of herself from 50 years ago.”

While Streisand might still choose to release more music in the near future, her fans shouldn’t expect to see her on tour or in live performances where all of her frailties would be clearly exposed.

“You won’t see Barbra on tour again,” the source also noted. “For her, the performing chapter closed last night. It’s over.”

Barbra Streisand’s Voice During The Oscars Tribute To Robert Redford Was Criticized

Much of the criticism about Streisand’s performance for her late friend centered on her voice, with many worried that the legendary singer had lost her ability to sing.

“Cats in heat screaming late at night sound better than Barbra Streisand,” one netizen wrote on X.

“Barbra Streisand [is] starting to sound her age, oh no, we need the immortality potion STAT,” said a fan.

Advertisement

“I’m crying aty moots hating that horrible a-s  Barbra Streisand tribute bit… it was a-s,” a third user noted.

One more person commented, “I thought it was shocking. Her mic was crap, and her voice sounded the same. So disappointing.”

Netizens Claim The Singer Made The Robert Redford Tribute ‘All About’ Herself

Some users also criticized the veteran star for allegedly making the tribute to Redford all about herself.

“Cannot believe Barbra Streisand just made a Robert Redford tribute all about … her,” one wrote.

Another individual commented, “Barbara Streisand is that friend at the funeral making everything about themselves lmaooo cause girl WHAT.”

Advertisement

Despite the wave of criticism, the actress did receive some support from some loyal fans.

“Barbra Streisand’s tribute to Robert Redford literally brought me to tears. I did not expect her to break out into song, but when she did, it totally broke me,” an individual remarked.

What Barbra Streisand Said About Her Late Friend, Robert Redford

As part of Streisand’s tribute to Redford, she recalled their time on “The Way We Were,” the 1973 romantic drama that has since become a classic among movie lovers.

“After I read the first script of The Way We Were, I could only imagine one man in the role of Hubbell [Gardiner], and that was Robert Redford,” Streisand said, per the Rolling Stone. “But he turned it down because he said the character had no backbone; he doesn’t stand for anything. And he was right. So many drafts later, Bob finally agreed to do it,” she said.

Midway through the speech, she heaped praise on Redford, describing him as a “brilliant” and “subtle” actor with whom she had a “wonderful time” working on set.

Advertisement

Streisand also touched on her late friend’s humanitarian activities, including his work to protect the press, the environment, and emerging entertainers.

She added, “He spoke up to defend freedom of the press, protect the environment, and encourage new voices at his Sundance Institute, and some of whom are up for Oscars tonight, which is so great. He was thoughtful and bold. I called him an ‘intellectual cowboy,’…And I miss him now more than ever.”

General Hospital two-week spoilers for March 16th through the 27th. We’ve got Ava Jerome (Maura West) warning somebody and Curtis Ashford (Donnell Turner) completely stunned.

General Hospital Spoilers Monday, March 16th: Jordan’s Pregnancy Decision

Monday, March 16th, we got Stella Henry (Vernee Watson) asking Jordan Ashford (Tanisha Harper) if she is considering terminating the pregnancy. So, this sounds like a confirmation, right? And I wonder if this is because she’s high-risk, if she doesn’t want any more kids, if the dad may not be Curtis.

Or if she doesn’t want to compete with Portia Robinson (Brook Kerr), if it’s all of the above. And also, did you guys notice at the manicure, the mani-pedi place on Friday, when did Portia’s baby bump go from zero to a lap full? They just skipped, you know, the whole second trimester.

Jason Morgan (Steve Burton) and Sonny Corinthos (Maurice Benard) make a promise to each other on Monday. And Jason’s telling Sonny he’s on his way out of town with Britt Westbourne (Kelly Thiebaud) and he’s going to eliminate that bastard. I’m assuming that is Cullum.

Cody Bell (Josh Kelly) goes over to Alexis Davis’ (Nancy Lee Grahn) place to see Molly Lansing-Davis (Kristen Vaganos). He’s got a whole basket of goodies for her. And Cody is teasing her that he’s the doctor there to check on the patient. And Molly says Cody’s sweet. And she knows he’s trying to help, but he’s making things harder.

And he goes ahead and makes it even harder and takes Dante Falconeri’s (Dominic Zamprogna) advice and tells Molly how he feels. He’s falling for her. But of course, she’s really worried about telling Cody that she can’t have kids because of the endometriosis.

GH Spoilers: Laura’s Fed Up

Tracy Quartermaine (Jane Elliot) goes over to see Laura Spencer (Genie Francis), and this may be about Jenz Sidwell (Carlo Rota). He’s a problem for both of them. And Laura tells somebody, presumably Tracy, that she cares less and less by the day. So politics might have lost their luster now that Sidwell basically owns her.

And Tracy’s also griping that she fell off her horse. Maybe she’s griping to Cody. Is she going to blame somebody? I don’t know. Portia is big mad likely because Jordan is pregnant and Portia may call Jordan out on her hypocrisy especially if she’s like oh you know Curtis doesn’t know.

Since you know Jordan ran to Curtis and blabbed that Portia was pregnant when Jordan suspected and didn’t even know. that was over what like an egg salad sandwich or some kind of salmon. It was something at the tea party. She didn’t even know it was true and went to tell him.

Meanwhile, Curtis is reassuring Trina Robinson (Tabyana Ali) on Monday, and he may be letting Trina know they’re going to be family, even though he and Portia are divorcing. Curtis is moving on with Jordan. There’s a new baby on the way. Lots happening. Still family.

General Hospital Spoilers Tuesday, March 17th: Portia May Tell Curtis About Jordan’s Pregnancy

Tuesday, March 17th, Ross Cullum (Andrew Hawkes) gets questioned by Jack Brennan (Chris McKenna). I don’t think he’s going to get very far with Cullum because Brennan is not his boss. Meanwhile, Carly Corinthos Spencer (Laura Wright) goes and warns Sonny. And this may be about Sidwell working with Cullum.

I’m curious to see if Jason happens to tell Sonny about Valentin Cassadine (James Patrick Stuart). I kind of don’t think he will. And I kind of don’t think Carly will either. Ric Lansing (Rick Hearst) and Elizabeth Webber (Rebecca Herbst) have a chat about their future.

They’re out to dinner. Looks like it’s a date. She’s looking a little unsure. I think Ric’s going to want more than she wants to give. Plus, Elizabeth is getting closer to Dante lately. Also, Portia makes a choice about something on Tuesday.

And I wonder if she’s going to go spill to Curtis that Jordan is pregnant. I mean, you know, she spilled plenty of Portia’s secrets, so I think it’d be karma if it went that way. Also, this week, Jordan has a talk with Curtis there at her place, and she’s looking super stressed out.

GH Spoilers Wednesday, March 18th: Lulu and Nathan’s First Official Date

Wednesday, March 18th, Lulu Spencer (Alexa Havins Bruening) and Nathan West (Ryan Paevey) are out on their official first date. Now that Maxie Jones (Kirsten Storms) and Dante know, well, you know, Lulu and Nathan can go public and give it a real shot. I think they’re going to get a lot of side eye around town.

Harrison Chase (Josh Swickard) gets romantic with Brook Lynn Quartermaine (Amanda Setton) and Jason has a hard conversation with somebody. I’m pretty sure it’s Danny Morgan (Asher Antonyzyn) because Jason needs to tell him that he’s leaving town and he can’t really tell him why. I mean, Danny’s a teenager, not a little kid still. But I don’t think Jason should be leaving his kid.

Elizabeth is put on the spot by someone. Maybe Ric on this reunion thing. Maybe somebody else. Lucas Jones (Van Hansis) has cause for alarm and obviously Marco Rios (Adrian Anchondo) is trying to get Britt’s meds and there’s a lot of urgency to that. So, we’ll see how that goes.

Thursday, March 19th: Jason Jumps into Action on General Hospital

Then on Thursday, March 19th, Jason jumps into action. So, maybe it’s to protect Britt. You know, we’ll see if they run into danger on their way out of town. I think they’re going to make it out of town safely, but we’ll see. Also, Ava has a warning for Lucas.

That could be about Sidwell, but I don’t know. She seems to like him and is blind to his villain. Or maybe about his sister Carly. Lulu and Nathan are interrupted on their date. I mean, gosh, it could be Dante, Felicia Scorpio (Kristina Wagner), or Mac Scorpio (John J. York) or Damian Spinelli (Bradford Anderson).

Anybody’s going to be shocked to see Lulu and Nathan out on a date, you know, making star eyes at each other. Tracy gets into an argument with Alexis. And it may be about who’s going to keep an eye on Danny while Jason’s gone.

but he already asked Michael Corinthos (Chad Duell) to do it. And Marco takes a big risk and it looks like he’s going to make a move to get into that safe at Wyndemere and get Britt’s medication because Lucas wants him to.

GH Spoilers Friday, March 20th: Michael Gets Defensive

Friday, March 20th, we’re going to wrap up the week with Michael getting defensive. So, this may be about taking some heat from the ladies because Jason has given him responsibility for Danny instead of Tracy or Alexis or anybody else. It could have something to do with Willow Tait (Katelyn MacMullen) and the kids, though.

Plus, Nathan gives Dante a warning and it may be about, you know, cop business or the Jane Doe baby case or even him and Lulu. You know, maybe he says the date went well. We’re going to, you know, keep seeing each other.

Alexis demands answers. And this could be about Jason leaving Danny and leaving town, or it could be about her really not wanting to take Scout Cain (Cosette Abinante) over to Drew Cain Quartermaine‘s (Cameron Mathison) place.

Britt is rattled. Also this week, sparks are flying again for Carly and Valentin. They’re in Carly’s kitchen, but I bet they’re going to make it back to the bedroom soon.

Week Two: March 23rd-27th General Hospital Spoilers

The week of March 23rd through the 27th, Jason’s offscreen, really soon. Steve Burton left on his sabbatical weeks ago and confirmed he is offscreen by the end of the month. Our source says he is abducted. Check back tomorrow for an exclusive leak on this.

Britt and Jason run into a problem and Valentin and Carly are getting closer and of course they’re going to continue plotting against Jack and now there’s other players in here with Cullum and Sidwell and all that.

And I do wonder if with all this intrigue Valentin and Carly may catch genuine feelings. I’m here for it. This is one of my favorite pairings of Carly’s if I’m being honest.

General Hospital: Lulu & Nathan Heat Up & Drew is Terrified

Michael looks out for Danny while Jason is gone and Marco may land in trouble. He took a huge risk betraying his father and Cullum to get the meds and he may be seen. You know, Pascal’s always creeping around. Lulu and Nathan are heating up on General Hospital.

I do hope they figure out what the deal is with him and those missing seven years before, you know, Lulu hits the sheets with him. Jordan is struggling with her secret and I do think she’s going to have to tell Curtis and after it’s out then Jordan is struggling with the fallout from that and what is next for her in this pregnancy.

Britt is absolutely terrified because things are going to go sideways and it’s not going to be a situation of Jason being able to protect her like they planned. Plus, Drew is desperate to escape Willow’s clutches. So, I wonder if he’s going to get through to somebody soon.

The good news is Kai Taylor (Jens Austin Astrup) actually still residually cares about the guy a little bit and he’s going to be around a lot. Sonny and DA Justine Turner (Nazneen Contractor) have a hard time resisting the pull towards each other.

And Charlotte Cassadine (Bluesy Burke) plays Nina Reeves (Cynthia Watros). So, Valentin didn’t like it, but Charlotte wants to feed Nina some false info to throw Brennan off her dad’s trail.

QVC fashion designer Kim Gravel is reacting to a shopper who called into her show with an unforgettable testimonial.

“I loved it!” Gravel, 54, exclusively told Us Weekly on Monday, March 16, of the caller’s unconventional fashion confession. “That’s the fun of live TV. You never know what a caller is going to say. Moments like that are exactly why I love taking calls during shows. It reminds me that we’re all just women having a good time talking about clothes — and apparently tassels!”

Over the weekend, QVC shared a clip of a woman named Maryanne praising Gravel’s clothes.

“I wanted to tell you that I got that blouse with the tassels, and I used to wear the tassels on my pasties,” the caller said. “Do you know what pasties are? Well, I had tassels on my pasties.”

During the live — and unscripted — moment, QVC program host Mary DeAngelis quickly stepped out of the shot, likely to hide her full reaction.

As for Gravel, she kept the conversation going and praised the shopper for sharing her story.

“Maryanne, I just want to say this: You are my emotional support diva,” Gravel said. “You have just made my whole entire day. Mary’s walked off. She’s dead on the couch. Maryanne is my sister from another mister.”

DeAngelis, 50, added, “I’m having therapy with Maryanne right now.”

Gravel is one of QVC’s top fashion designers and was previously named the network’s vendor of the year. In addition to her fashion brand, Belle by Kim Gravel, she also has her Love Who You Are beauty line.

Her next project is a digital course titled Selling With Soul. Launching Tuesday, March 17, the eight-module digital course breaks down Gravel’s exact playbook behind generating over $1.4 billion in live sales.

Advertisement

Related: QVC’s Most Memorable Hosts: Where Are They Now?

Some QVC shoppers can’t help but make a connection with some of the network’s products — and hosts. Over the years, viewers have developed close bonds with longtime program hosts who have a gift of selling everything from fashion and beauty products to food and electronics. Every so often, some of the program hosts decide […]

“Selling With Soul is built on the belief that live selling is a conversation, not a performance,” Gravel shared in a statement to Us. “When you focus on genuine connection and create a space where people feel valued, the audience responds and the business grows in an authentic, sustainable way.”

As for live phone calls, Gravel previously told Us that she has no idea what to expect when the program hosts welcome in a shopper during a show.

“Not only do I [not] know what to expect, but QVC doesn’t,” she told Us in May 2025. “It is truly, authentically the customer calling in. And you never know what they’re gonna say. They never tell you in your ear, ‘She’s gonna ask you about this.’ All you see on the screen is their name and where they’re from. That’s it.”