Connect with us

NewsBeat

DWP confirms PIP award length changes from April

Published

on

Wales Online

DWP plans to increase the length of awards for people making new PIP claims

The UK Government plans to extend the length of awards for people making a new claim for Personal Independence Payment (PIP) from April in order to help reduce the backlog of Work Capability Assessments (WCA). The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) said the measure is designed to free up health professionals to conduct more face-to-face assessments and complete additional WCA reassessments.

Currently, the interval between PIP award reviews can be as short as nine months and the majority of people do not experience a change in their award at review. This is to be lengthened for most PIP claimants aged 25 and over to a minimum of three years for a new claim, increasing to five years at their subsequent review if they continue to be entitled.

Advertisement

These operational changes are separate from the Timms Review, which will examine the role of PIP, eligibility for the daily living and mobility components, assessment process and the criteria in supporting disabled people to achieve better health, higher living standards and greater independence.

The new measure in April will come into force alongside modifications to Universal Credit that narrows the gap between what people receive for being unemployed compared to long-term sickness. The alterations will see the UK Government fulfil a pledge it made in the Pathways to Work Green Paper to increase face-to-face assessments after they were suspended due to the Covid-19 pandemic, with contracts agreed by the previous government requiring 80 per cent of assessments to be completed virtually.

The proportion of face-to-face assessments will be increased, with those for PIP rising from 6 per cent in 2024 (57,000) to 30 per cent of all assessments, and the WCA from 13 per cent in 2024 (74,000) to 30 per cent, reports the Daily Record.

The UK Government said it is implementing these changes and “reforming the broken welfare system it inherited” by extending the time between assessments to check if a claimant’s condition still qualifies them for PIP, freeing up health professionals to conduct more assessments face-to-face and deliver more WCA reassessments.

Advertisement

It added: “Reassessments play an important role in taking account of how changes in health conditions and disabilities affect people over time.”

In total, the measures are expected to save the UK taxpayer £1.9 billion by the end of 2030/31 and comes alongside employment support aimed at sick or disabled people including Connect to Work, and the redeployment of 1,000 work coaches.

Secretary of State for Work and Pensions Pat McFadden recently stated: “We’re committed to reforming the welfare system we inherited, which for too long has written off millions as too sick to work.

“That is why we are ramping up the number of assessments we do face-to-face and taking action to tackle the inherited backlog of people waiting for a Work Capability Assessment.

Advertisement

“These reforms will allow us to save £1.9 billion, creating a welfare state that supports those who need it whilst helping people into work and delivering fairness to the taxpayer.”

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

NewsBeat

‘Phenomenal’ thriller hailed ‘best show ever’ is on Netflix now

Published

on

Daily Mirror

Fans are calling the binge-worthy thriller ‘a really intriguing premise with a perfect acting duo’

More than 100 episodes aired as the series was hailed ‘one of the top 5 shows of all time’.

Advertisement

Devotees of sci-fi and nail-biting thrillers are set for a real treat as Netflix has just welcomed a 2011 gem into its vast catalogue.

Over 100 episodes of the crime drama originally broadcast on CBS, with the narrative centring on an enigmatic, reclusive billionaire computer programmer.

Michael Emerson portrays Harold Finch, who created a sophisticated computer programme for the federal government dubbed the Machine. The system was able to forecast terrorist attacks and identify those plotting them.

Person of Interest proved enormously successful upon its debut and was hailed by numerous critics as the finest science fiction series on broadcast television.

Advertisement

Enthusiasts have flocked to Rotten Tomatoes to express their views and encourage others to watch, with Matt B declaring: “Person of Interest is the best show ever.”

He continued: “Great characters: Finch is top-notch great and Michael Emerson absolutely pulls off each scene with excellence. John Reese – Jim Caviezel is flawless and awesome. Fusco – Kevin Chapman balances the show and is also a great actor!”.

Zoran I remarked: “Absolutely thrilling show that showcases the incredible impact of AI on everyone!”.

Advertisement

Michelle H stated: “This is a superb show and binge-worthy. We had not seen it when it was originally released but only recently caught up with the series via Amazon Prime.”

One viewer remarked: “We find the idea very compelling and the plotting excellent, not to mention the actors who are perfectly cast. It keeps you wanting to know more- from the big-picture stories that move the series forward to each episode where the characters work to help save doomed souls. We need more of these types of series.”

Zack R simply declared: “Easily in the top 5 shows of ALL TIME!”

J noted: “Give it an episode or two and you will be hooked. A really intriguing premise with a perfect acting duo for Reese and Finch.”

Elijah A praised: “Phenomenal: well-made, well-acted, powerfully scored, with profound and timely themes. Very thrilling and touching.”

The critically lauded programme claimed the 2012 People’s Choice Award for Favourite New TV Drama and the 2016 People’s Choice Award for Favourite TV Crime Drama.

Screen Rant revealed the show concluded because it wasn’t commercially viable enough for CBS, as the majority of advertising revenue was directed to Warner Bros, which held the rights to the programme.

Advertisement

The creators of the series, which attracted millions of viewers with each instalment, had been informed beforehand that the show would likely finish after five seasons, allowing them to craft a satisfying finale.

Person of Interest is on Netflix.

For the latest showbiz, TV, movie and streaming news, go to the new **Everything Gossip** website.

Ensure our latest headlines always appear at the top of your Google Search by making us a Preferred Source.** Click here to activate** or add us as your Preferred Source in your Google search settings.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Here’s where things stand after the US and Israel attacked Iran

Published

on

Here's where things stand after the US and Israel attacked Iran

The United States and Israel targeted Iran in coordinated attacks over the weekend that killed Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and dozens of other senior figures and kicked off a furious Iranian response that threatens a wider regional war.

Allies of the U.S. pledged to help stop Iran’s missile and drone strikes. The Lebanese militant group Hezbollah claimed strikes on Israel for the first time in more than a year, and Israel fired back.

The first U.S. military deaths have been reported. Other deaths have been confirmed in Israel and Gulf nations, while Iran has said hundreds of people have been killed there.

With Khamenei’s death, the Islamic Republic must now choose a supreme leader for the first time since 1989. U.S. President Donald Trump has urged Iranians to seize the moment and overthrow the theocracy that cracked down on nationwide protests early this year. There was no sign that was happening.

Advertisement

Around the world, some protested. Others cheered.

The attacks came two days after the latest U.S.-Iran talks aimed at putting controls on Tehran’s nuclear program. They echoed the events of last year, when talks were cut short by an Israeli attack that led to a 12-day war and U.S. bombing of Iranian nuclear sites. Washington has claimed that Iran was rebuilding its nuclear program in recent months.

Iran has said it hasn’t enriched since June, but it has blocked IAEA inspectors from visiting the sites America bombed.

Here’s where things stand.

Advertisement

Iran

The 86-year-old Khamenei was killed when his compound was bombed Saturday morning. Iran’s ballistic missile sites, navy headquarters and warships were attacked as well. Iran said strikes also targeted the Natanz nuclear enrichment site. Israel and the U.S. have not acknowledged strikes at the site, though Israel has said it is targeting the “leadership and nuclear infrastructure.”

Khamenei had no designated successor. Iran has set up a three-member leadership council, and Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi has said a new supreme leader would be chosen in “one or two days.” On the streets, there have been scattered celebrations over Khamenei’s death. Internet restrictions in Iran have complicated efforts to monitor what’s happening.

In retaliation, Iran’s military has struck Israel, where several people have been killed. Iran has also targeted U.S. bases in the region. The U.S. military said three service members were killed, the first known U.S. casualties. Other Iranian strikes have killed a handful of people in Gulf nations including the United Arab Emirates and Kuwait, and hundreds of flights have been affected at some of the world’s busiest airports.

What to watch for: further military strikes, the selection of a new supreme leader, and reactions from the Iranian people.

Advertisement

United States

The strikes came after the U.S. built up its biggest military presence in the region in decades. Israeli and U.S. authorities spent weeks tracking the movements of senior Iranian leaders. Trump has said the “heavy and pinpoint bombing” in Iran would continue through the week or longer.

U.S. military bases throughout the region remain a potential target of Iranian attacks.

The U.S. has signaled it is willing to talk to Iran’s new leaders, eventually. Meanwhile, some leaders in Congress have protested at the launch of the strikes without congressional authorization.

What to watch for: further military strikes, effects on U.S. bases and forces, and any diplomacy with Iran’s new leadership.

Advertisement

Israel

Israel sees Iran as an existential threat and has long sought to end its nuclear and ballistic missile programs, while also targeting armed allied groups like Hamas in Gaza and Hezbollah in Lebanon. Israeli attacks have weakened those groups since Hamas’ Oct. 7, 2023, attack on Israel that started the war in Gaza.

Israel launched strikes in Lebanon early Monday in retaliation for missiles that Hezbollah launched across the border.

Now Israel has pledged “nonstop” strikes and at one point said 100 fighter jets were simultaneously striking targets in Tehran. During last year’s war, Israel pitched Trump a plan to kill Khamenei. Now they have.

Israelis dashed to shelters for safety all weekend, but most of Iran’s attacks have been intercepted. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, under international criticism for the war in Gaza, is claiming a win for Israel’s security.

Advertisement

But risk remains from Iranian-backed groups like the Houthi rebels in Yemen who have vowed to resume attacks on Red Sea shipping routes and on Israel.

What to watch for: further military strikes, as well as attacks by and against Iranian proxies.

The Middle East and beyond

The current conflict is already far more intense than last year’s Israel-Iran war, where the U.S. inserted itself near the end by bombing Iranian nuclear sites and Iran responded with a calculated attack on a U.S. military base in Qatar.

Now, hundreds of Iranian missile and drone strikes have sent people scrambling across Gulf nations that had previously been relatively insulated from the volatility in the region.

Advertisement

The United Arab Emirates said Dubai’s main airport had been affected, and tourists and others flinched at the booms of interceptors. Saudi Arabia said it intercepted attacks, and summoned Iran’s ambassador. Top diplomats of six Gulf states said they had the “right to self-defense.”

Oil prices rose sharply when market trading began Sunday as traders bet that supply from the critical region would slow or stop. Attacks on and near the Strait of Hormuz, the world’s most critical oil chokepoint, are also raising concerns about supply.

In response, eight countries that are part of the OPEC+ oil cartel said they would boost production of crude.

And on Monday, the world might learn the first details about any effects on Iran’s nuclear program as the International Atomic Energy Agency’s Board of Governors holds a meeting on the conflict.

Advertisement

What to watch for: oil prices, details on Iran’s nuclear program, and diplomatic efforts.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Wunmi Mosaku Calls Out BBC Over Baftas N-Word Tic Broadcast

Published

on

Wunmi Mosaku Calls Out BBC Over Baftas N-Word Tic Broadcast

During the awards show, which took place last month, Tourette’s syndrome campaigner John Davidson experienced an involuntary tic while Wunmi’s co-stars Michael B Jordan and Delroy Lindo were presenting on stage, resulting in him shouting the N-word from the audience.

In the week that followed, both Bafta and the BBC faced scrutiny about the incident, particularly after the racial slur was included in the national broadaster’s coverage of the event, which aired on a two-hour time delay.

Asked for her “take” during an interview with Entertainment Tonight at Sunday’s Actor Awards, Wunmi began: “I was there and it was painful to have that celebration kind of really tainted for me.”

While the British actor was quick to state that she holds “no hard feelings towards John Davidson at all”, she pointed out that Bafta has a “lot of lessons to learn” following what transpired at this year’s ceremony.

Advertisement

Echoing comments made by Sinners cast member Jayme Lawson earlier in the weekend, Wunmi continued: “It felt exploitative and performative to have someone there without the full protection of everyone – including him – and anyone in that audience. There were children in that audience.”

“That’s one thing,” she added. “And then the BBC is a whole other thing. That’s the bit that really kind of kept me awake at night and brought tears to my eyes. I was like, ‘you really chose to keep that in’. I can’t understand it. And I’m not sure if I can forgive it.”

After Delroy Lindo expressed disappointment over how Bafta handled the incident, Bafta issued a public apology to both actors, and accepted “full responsibility” for what transpired.

Meanwhile, the BBC has “fast-tracked” an investigation into how the racist slur came to be included in its Baftas broadcast, which a spokesperson described as a “serious mistake”.

Advertisement

Following her win at the 2026 Baftas, Wunmi is currently in the running to pick up Best Supporting Actress at the upcoming Oscars, where Sinners has made history as the awards show’s most-nominated film ever.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

NewsBeat

What travel insurance will actually cover if you’re affected by UAE travel chaos

Published

on

Daily Mirror

Whether you’re currently stranded in the UAE or another affected country, or have a holiday booked in the near future, you may be wondering what your travel insurance will really cover amid the current chaos

Most holidaymakers know that travel insurance is vital no matter where you are going in the world. The advice has always been to book your travel insurance policy as soon as you book your holiday, as this can protect against cancellations and last-minute hitches.

Advertisement

But amid the current travel chaos across the Middle East, many travellers will be wondering what their insurance actually covers. Do you simply get the money back for a cancelled break, or can it help with other expenses? A lot depends on the type of policy you have, terms and conditions, and levels of cover chosen, so here are some key things travellers need to know.

Does travel insurance cover war?

Most standard travel insurance policies won’t cover ‘acts of war’, so there’s no guarantee that people caught up in the current situation will be able to make a claim. Some policies offer enhancements such as travel disruption coverage, which includes unexpected disruptions such as natural disasters, civil unrest, terrorism, and airspace disruption.

READ MORE: UK holiday spot warning as Foreign Office confirms Brit deaths and issues adviceREAD MORE: Emirates, British Airways and Wizz Air’s latest updates on UAE flight cancellations

Advertisement

In the event that Brits are evacuated from a country en masse, it is the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO) that would organise transport, rather than insurers. Therefore, the FCDO is asking Brits to register their presence in countries such as the United Arab Emirates and Israel.

Some policies include ‘travel curtailment’, which means they may cover a claim if a holiday is cut short. However, if the policy doesn’t cover acts of war, you’re unlikely to be able to claim if your trip is shorter than planned or for costs associated with this.

Tim Riley, managing director of travel insurer True Traveller and chairperson of the UK Travel Industry Association, said: “Standard travel insurance policies do not cover war, hostile acts, civil war, military action, invasions or similar large-scale conflict events. This exclusion is standard across the global insurance market because war presents systemic, unpredictable risks that cannot be priced into conventional travel insurance products.

“However, travellers are still covered for claims unrelated to the conflict itself. For example, illness, accidents not connected to hostilities or lost or stolen baggage would typically be handled in line with the normal terms and conditions of the policy. “It is important to note that airlines have a legal obligation to re-route passengers once services resume, and it looks like there will be UK Government-funded repatriation of British passport holders imminently.”

Advertisement

Will my insurer cover flight delays or cancellations?

The UK has a list of legal requirements for what airlines need to provide passengers when their flights are delayed or cancelled. Tim continued: “If your airline cancels your flight, you are legally entitled to choose between a full refund or re-routing to your final destination at no additional cost. Airlines must offer one of these options.”

Passengers with trips to affected areas in the next 72 hours should hear from their airline soon, and many airlines are releasing statements with further information about what steps passengers need to take. A spokesperson for British Airways said: “We are closely monitoring the situation and have cancelled a number of our flights to the Middle East. Safety is always our top priority and we would never operate a flight unless it was safe to do so.

“If you are due to fly between London Heathrow and Abu Dhabi, Amman, Bahrain, Doha, Dubai or Tel Aviv you can change your flight free of charge up to and including 6 March. Customers travelling up to and including 4 March may also request a full refund.”

Advertisement

Tim advised travellers not to automatically accept a refund if they’re offered one. “It is important that travellers do not accept a refund automatically if they still wish to travel. Accepting a refund effectively ends the airline’s duty of care and its obligation to re-route you. You would then need to book new flights yourself, which may be significantly more expensive. Travel insurance will not cover the price difference between a refunded ticket and a new booking,” he said.

What should I do if I have a holiday booked in a few weeks?

If you have a holiday booked somewhere on the FCDO’s do not travel list and are departing in the next few weeks, you probably won’t hear from your holiday provider or airline for a while. Most travel companies will be swamped with enquiries at the moment, so unless you are due to travel within 72 hours, you may need to be patient and keep an eye on the situation.

Tim added: “If the Foreign Office advises against all travel to your destination before you depart and you’ve booked a package holiday through a UK tour operator, you are entitled to cancel without paying cancellation fees under the Package Travel Regulations 2018 and should receive a full refund, typically within 14 days, provided the warning significantly affects your trip.”

READ MORE: Full list of 21 countries where Foreign Office currently advises against travelREAD MORE: UAE travel update for Brits as BA, Wizz Air and Emirates suspend flights

Advertisement

He added: “If the advice is against all but essential travel, the position is more nuanced and many reputable operators will still cancel and refund, but legally it depends on whether the situation constitutes unavoidable and extraordinary circumstances.

“For travellers who have booked flights and accommodation separately rather than as a package, refund rights are less automatic, as airlines and hotels will apply their own cancellation policies. In those cases, travellers should check their travel insurance wording carefully, as some policies may provide cover depending on the circumstances.”

Do you have a story you want to share? Email us at webtravel@reachplc.com

Ensure our latest stories always appear at the top of your Google Search by making us a Preferred Source. Click here to activate or add us as your Preferred Source in your Google search settings.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Britain says it’s not at war after a drone strikes its Akrotiri base in Cyprus

Published

on

Britain says it's not at war after a drone strikes its Akrotiri base in Cyprus

AKROTIRI, Cyprus (AP) — Britain is not at war, the government said Monday, despite saying it would allow the U.S. to use British bases during its war with Iran and after a Royal Air Force base in Cyprus was struck by an Iranian-made drone.

Sirens sounded again at RAF Akrotiri on Monday and British warplanes were scrambled, apparently in response to a new threat.

More than two decades after Britain followed the United States into a devastating war in Iraq, it is trying to avoid being drawn into a new Middle East conflict with unpredictable consequences.

Akrotiri attacked

U.K. officials say an attack drone hit the runway at RAF Akrotiri, a British air force base in Cyprus, late Sunday. There were no injuries and “minimal” damage, but the strike brought the conflict onto European soil.

Advertisement

It was not immediately clear whether the drone was launched from Iran or by a Tehran-backed militant group such as Hezbollah in Lebanon.

Some 12 hours later, sirens sounded again as two Typhoon fighter jets and a pair of F-35 warplanes roared into the air. A resident showed to The Associated Press a text message sent from base authorities warning of an “ongoing security threat” and urging people to stay indoors and away from windows.

The Cypriot government said two drones headed for Cyprus were intercepted on Monday.

Akrotiri is the U.K.’s main air base for operations in the Middle East and in recent years has been used by British warplanes on missions against the Islamic State group in Syria and Iraq and to strike Houthi targets in Yemen.

Advertisement

Britain retained the base, and another on Cyprus, after the eastern Mediterranean island gained independence from British colonial rule in 1960.

It was previously attacked in 1986, when Libyan militants struck the base with mortars, rocket-propelled grenades and small arms, injuring three people.

As tensions between the U.S. and Iran mounted, Britain last month deployed extra F-35 fighter jets to Akrotiri, along with radar, counter-drone systems and air defenses, as part of “defensive measures.”

Britain’s defense ministry said Monday that families of U.K. personnel who live on the base were being moved to nearby accommodation as a precaution.

Advertisement

U.K. ambivalence

British officials have refused to say whether the U.K. supports the U.S.-Israeli war on Iran. They have said that Iran should not be able to have a nuclear weapon and called for an end to Iranian strikes and a diplomatic solution.

Britain did not take part in the strikes on Iran that began Saturday, and did not allow the U.S. to use U.K. bases in England or on the island of Diego Garcia in the Indian Ocean.

But on Sunday, Prime Minister Keir Starmer announced that he had agreed to let the U.S. use the bases for attacks on Iran’s missiles and their launch sites. He said the change came in response to Iranian attacks on U.K. interests and Britain’s allies in the Gulf, and is legal under international law.

Britain says its bases can’t be used for attacks on political and economic targets in Iran.

Advertisement

“We are not joining these strikes,” Starmer stressed, “but we will continue with our defensive actions in the region.”

U.S. President Donald Trump told the Daily Telegraph on Monday he was “very disappointed in Keir,” saying the prime minister “took far too long” to change his mind about the use of British bases.

Unpredictable consequences

“The U.K. is not at war,” Middle East Minister Hamish Falconer said Monday. He told the BBC Iran has ballistic missiles “pointed at the Gulf and it is vital that those missile launchers are taken out in the face of these completely reckless attacks.”

The memory of Iraq remains raw for many in Britain. The decision by then-Prime Minister Tony Blair to join the U.S.-led invasion in 2003 remains one of the most contentious in modern British history.

Advertisement

The subsequent yearslong conflict killed 179 British troops, some 4,500 American personnel and many thousands of Iraqis.

The current government is keen to prevent that happening again, but critics say that attempts to set firm limits on Britain’s involvement could be swept away by a fast-moving conflict.

“We are being drawn in, just as we were in Iraq, following the U.S. into an incredibly dangerous situation,” said John McDonnell, a lawmaker from the governing Labour Party.

___

Advertisement

Lawless reported from London.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Food Quality More Important Than Macros For Our Heart Health

Published

on

Food Quality More Important Than Macros For Our Heart Health

Well, according to a 30-year study published in the Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC), which looked at almost 200,000 adults, those might not be the most important questions.

“Focusing only on nutrient compositions but not food quality may not lead to health benefits,” the study’s lead author, Zhiyuan Wu, said.

Neither low-carb nor low-fat diets in and of themselves seemed to protect from heart disease

This research, which involved a cumulative 5.2 million hours of monitoring, asked participants to fill in surveys about what they ate throughout the study.

Advertisement

These were sorted into categories like healthy and unhealthy low-carbohydrate and low-fat diets by the researchers.

The scientists compared this data to the rate of coronary heart disease (CHD) among participants. There were just over 20,000 cases of CHD in this research.

They found that the “healthy” versions of both low-fat and low-carb diets – those which included a lot of fruits and veggies, whole grains, and unsaturated fats – were linked to a lower risk of CHD.

But “unhealthy” versions of low-fat and low-carb diets were linked to a higher risk of CHD. These were higher in animal-based fats and protein and refined carbohydrates.

Advertisement

What does that mean?

Researchers think this could show that the overall quality of our food might matter more than the exact macronutrient breakdown in our diets.

“These results suggest that healthy low-carbohydrate and low-fat diets may share common biological pathways that improve cardiovascular health,” Wu said.

“Focusing on overall diet quality may offer flexibility for individuals to choose eating patterns that align with their preferences while still supporting heart health.”

Advertisement

And in response to the study, editor-in-chief of the JACC, Dr Harlan M Krumholz, said: “This study helps move the conversation beyond the long-standing debate over low-carbohydrate versus low-fat diets.

“The findings show that what matters most for heart health is the quality of the foods people eat. Whether a diet is lower in carbohydrates or fat, emphasising plant-based foods, whole grains, and healthy fats is associated with better cardiovascular outcomes.”

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Middle East conflict: How is sport dealing with travel disruption?

Published

on

Cancelled flights to Dubai and Doha shown on flight information display at Hong Kong International Airport

Dubai Tennis Championships winner Daniil Medvedev is among the tennis players facing a disruption to their schedule.

The Russian’s representative said they were trying to establish how Medvedev could travel to California for next week’s Indian Wells tournament after the UAE “partially and temporarily” closed its airspace.

Finland’s Harri Heliovaara, winner of the men’s doubles event alongside Britain’s Henry Patten, said his travel plans are “still uncertain”.

“All of us players, the finalists and a few other doubles players, are stuck in Dubai. [Plus] all of the ATP staff, the umpires, physiotherapists, coaches and other team and family members – a total of about 30 people,” Heliovaara wrote in his blog, external.

Advertisement

He added that the option of leaving by road had been explored, but that would involve either a five-hour drive to Muscat – although bad traffic jams have been reported at the Oman border – or a journey exceeding 10 hours to Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Source link

Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Mystery behind unsolved murder of woman found dead in ditch on busy Cambridgeshire road

Published

on

Cambridgeshire Live

Janice Weston’s body was found in a ditch near a lay-by on the A1 in Cambridgeshire.

Cambridgeshire is a relatively safe place to live. However, in the past, the county has seen some quite gruesome murders take place that have caught the attention of the whole country.

Advertisement

While those involved in many of these murders have been caught, there have been some instances where the deaths remain a complete mystery – and the perpetrators have not been brought to justice. That is the case for the murder of Janice Weston, who was found dead in a ditch on a busy Cambridgeshire A-road.

In 1983, the 36-year-old left work on September 10 at around 4:15pm. She went home to change and had half a meal before getting into her silver Alfa Romeo car. Weston took her book manuscript with her, and her husband believed she was going to spend the weekend in London.

At the time, Weston lived in West London. She worked as a solicitor at Lincolns Inn where she was a partner at Charles Russell and Co.

Weston’s husband, who had been away in France at the time, tried calling her over the weekend but had received no response. The next morning, on Saturday, September 11, her fully clothed body was found in a ditch next to a lay-by on the northbound carriageway of the A1, around one and a half miles away from the Brampton Hut roundabout.

Advertisement

Her body had several wounds caused by a blunt object and it took the police several days to identify her. It is believed Weston had pulled over into the lay-by to change a tyre. The new tyre was found attached to the car but the old tyre was never found.

The murderer, who could have been in the car with Weston, had driven off in the car after the incident. It was later found abandoned in Camden Town with some money and the keys to her two properties still in the vehicle.

A man had ordered a new number plate that exactly matched the number of Weston’s car at a garage in Royston. Weston’s husband was held by police for 55 hours and they applied to the Director of Public Prosecutions to charge him.

Weston had only been married to her husband for 15 months and he had inherited £200,000 untaxed as a result of her death. After deliberating, the DPP decided to not pursue a trial and released her husband.

Advertisement

Even though the police carried out a thorough investigation of the murder, no one was ever convicted for the death of Janice Weston. The police have relaunched appeals over the years but to this day, it is still a mystery as to who killed Weston and why they did so.

Source link

Continue Reading

NewsBeat

The best anti-snore pillows of 2024 for easier breathing and better sleep

Published

on

The best anti-snore pillows of 2024 for easier breathing and better sleep

Pillows that stop snoring are a relatively new phenomenon but the market is growing quickly in a country where 45 per cent of adults snore occasionally and 25 per cent are chronic snorers. Not only can snoring develop into potentially serious sleep apnoea, but people who sleep next to snorers will lose up to an hour of sleep per night. This makes it all the more important to find the best anti-snore pillow.

When your airway narrows, it causes air to move more quickly, which vibrates the soft tissues,” explains Michael Breus PhD, Founder of The Sleep Doctor. “There are three common causes of this narrowing. The first is simply that your muscles relax in sleep. Gravity moves all the tissue backward a few millimetres, including the tongue and any adipose tissue around the neck, which narrows your airway.” He adds that nasal congestion and alcohol can also cause narrowing. 

The pillow you sleep on could be another factor: “If you sleep on your back and your pillow is overstuffed, it will push your head forward and narrow your airway. This can also happen with side sleepers to some extent. Meanwhile pillows with allergens like feathers can cause congestion.”

Advertisement

I’ve been reviewing bedding for years and as a snorer, I’ve compiled a list of the best anti-snore pillows. You can read my full reviews below, followed by some more advice from Dr Breus. If you’re in a hurry, here’s a look at my top five:

The best anti-snore pillow: At a glance

Source link

Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Greene King plan to refurbish Ye Olde Starre Inne in Stonegate, York

Published

on

Greene King plan to refurbish Ye Olde Starre Inne in Stonegate, York

Owners Greene King’s plans would see changes made inside and outside the Ye Olde Starre Inne, off Stonegate.

The plans include replacing a wooden sign which spans between buildings on either side of Stonegate advertising the pub to passersby and featuring its 1644 establishment date.

Greene King’s application stated the works would respect the building’s historic features while providing much-needed updates and improving the experience for patrons.

Plans for the refurbishments would see the sign spanning across Stonegate swapped for one with Greene King’s dark green and copper colour scheme.

Advertisement

The proposed sign for Ye Olde Starre Inne, in Stonegate, York. Picture is from Greene King/York Council’s planning portal, available for all LDRS partners to use.

The entrance to its beer garden, doors and window frames, which are all currently black, would also be repainted dark green.

Bar areas on the inside of the pub building would be rearranged and timber floors would be refinished with staining and polish.

New fixed seats and lights would be installed and the toilets would also be refurbished with new wall tiles and flooring.

A timber and polycarbonate pergola would cover the beer garden and outside lights would be replaced and walls repainted.

Advertisement

The Ye Olde Starre Inne is in a Grade II-listed building which dates back to the 16th Century with an early 17th Century wing.

It had become an inn called The Starre by 1644 and it is the pub in York which can show it has had a licence the longest.

During the English Civil War, it was used as a hospital for wounded soldiers after the Battle of Marsden Moor, which took place about seven miles from York in 1644.

In 1733, the pub’s landlord Thomas Bulman struck a deal with the owners of two shops on either side of Stonegate to hang a sign across the street.

Advertisement

A sign advertising the pub has been there ever since.

More extensions were added in the 18th and 19th Century and the building was refurbished in 1890 and 1985.

The pub was listed in 1954 and it features in Susanna Clarke’s 2004 alternate history novel Jonathan Strange & Mr Norrell, which is set during the Napoleonic Wars.

Plans stated the refurbishment would aim to bring the pub up to Greene King’s high standards across its estate.

Advertisement

They added the changes would respect the wider historic local area and the distinctiveness of the listed building.

Plans stated: “The proposed works seek to ensure the public house will continue to be a vibrant destination, assisting in helping to retain and attract new patrons.

“The proposed scope of works is limited to those necessary to improve the overall function of the existing pub and in doing so shall contribute to the economic vitality of the local area.”

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025