Throughout 1,460 days of the Ukraine war, two figures have remained central.
The decisions made by Ukraine’s Volodymyr Zelenskyy and Russia’s Vladimir Putin, their leadership styles, and their standing on the international stage have shaped a conflict soon entering its fifth year.
But how have the war’s two central figures changed in the past four years?
Sky News has explored each leader’s domestic and global image, as well as how the conflict has shaped them personally, in this piece.
Mr Zelenskyy has undergone one of the most dramatic image transformations of any contemporary leader in the past four years, going from a relatively inexperienced president to a central symbol of resistance and democratic defiance.
While his background in acting made his rise to Ukraine’s highest office an unlikely one, Mr Zelenskyy fit the presidential mould in his early years, at least in appearance.
Advertisement
Often seen clean-shaven and suited, images of Ukraine’s leader from before the full-scale Russian invasion in 2022 now make him appear boyish compared to the hardened wartime leader of 2026.
Mr Zelenskyy is now rarely spotted in anything other than military fatigues, something that famously irked Donald Trump when he hosted the Ukrainian president for a disastrous meeting at the White House last year.
Zelenskyy at home
Domestically, the 2022 invasion saw Mr Zelenskyy experience an initial surge in approval and trust as Ukrainians rallied behind their leader.
Advertisement
His decision to stay in Kyiv and lead from the capital, even after offers to evacuate for his own safety, became symbolic of Ukrainian resistance, enhancing his credibility and sense of purpose.
“The fight is here; I need ammunition, not a ride,” he reportedly told US officials as Russia’s 35-mile armoured convoy closed in on the capital.
February 2022: Zelenskyy says he’s staying in Kyiv as his country comes under Russian attack
From that moment on, Mr Zelenskyy has remained a central unifying figure in Ukraine, providing nightly video updates to inform and rally his people and making visits to frontline towns to inspire his troops.
Mr Zelenskyy’s global standing skyrocketed after 2022. He became not just Ukraine’s leader but the face of its diplomatic effort, repeatedly addressing parliaments, world leaders and public audiences to sustain foreign support.
By framing the war with Russia as a broader struggle between democracy and authoritarianism, Ukraine’s president positioned his country on the world stage as defending both European and Western values.
Advertisement
He’s been successful in his repeated attempts to bring financial and military support to Ukraine and maintained working relationships with key allies throughout the war. He even wrestled Donald Trump back from the brink after their disastrous White House meeting last February.
Advertisement
Sky’s David Blevins takes us through the Ukrainian and US presidents’ meeting at the White House
Outside questions remain – largely from Europe – over Mr Zelenskyy’s ability to tackle corruption at home, while his reputation in Russia has remained negative, but his image on the world stage overall remains positive.
Zelenskyy the man
Advertisement
So, what about how the last four years have changed Mr Zelenskyy personally?
There is no doubt about the toll the war has taken on the president and his family, as it has for millions of Ukrainians.
In the early months of the war, his family were evacuated and taken to secret locations to keep them safe. That separation had a clear impact on Mr Zelenskyy.
According to First Lady Olena Zelenska, her husband now appreciates the simple things more, such as communication with his family.
Advertisement
“Send him a photo of his son or tell him what his daughter said. And it touches him very emotionally now,” she said in 2023.
“He wasn’t so sensitive to it before.”
Vladimir Putin
Image: File pics: Reuters
Despite hoping to see Ukraine capitulate within days, Russia’s invasion has now dragged into its fifth year. In that time, Mr Putin’s global standing has largely deteriorated to pariah status.
The Ukraine war has recast his image, both domestically as the wartime leader Russia “needs” (in state narratives) and internationally as a more marginalised, conflict-driven figure.
Advertisement
Personally, the Russian president has become more isolated since the invasion, both in terms of his public appearances and his demeanour – claiming he “jokes less” since the war began.
Putin at home
Inside Russia, Mr Putin’s popularity has been sustained by a mix of state-controlled messaging, repression of dissent and wartime patriotic mobilisation, even amid economic strain and military setbacks.
His approval ratings initially rosesharply after the invasion began, reaching some of the highest figures in years, with a surge in patriotic sentiment and support for “defending Russia”.
Advertisement
Image: Vladimir Putin shakes hands with a wounded Russian soldier in Moscow, December 2025
And while sanctions, mobilisation and economic pressures dented some support, independent and state pollsters still often report significant backing for Mr Putin among many Russians.
Even so, it can be difficult to gauge public opinion of the president inside Russia thanks to censorship and media control.
The Kremlin has demanded active participation in and support for the war from society since 2022, not just quiet compliance.
Opposition politics are outlawed, independent media has been almost entirely dismantled or subjected to strict “foreign agent” laws, and even mentioning the war in ways that contradict official narratives can lead to prison sentences.
But that hasn’t stopped some direct criticism. One womanwrote to Mr Putin demanding an explanation as to why her late son, an 18-year-old conscript, had been involved in combat.
Advertisement
The spiralling cost of living has also damaged Mr Putin at home. For many households, everyday essentials – from basic groceries to fuel and housing – have become markedly more expensive, squeezing incomes despite official assurances of economic resilience.
During his2025 annual address, Russians sent messages for the president to answer, many of which raised concerns over the state of the economy.
The key moments of Putin annual press marathon
Putin abroad
Advertisement
Outside Russia’s borders, Mr Putin’s reputation has worsened markedly.
While relations with many Western governments were already strained before 2022, the invasion of Ukraine transformed long-standing suspicion into broad diplomatic isolation.
Mr Putin no longer sits comfortably at global tables and forums frequented by world powers, while several Western governments have severed ties entirely.
In response, Russia’s president has kept relationships with his few remaining allies close, narrowing his diplomatic circle.
Mr Putin had no contact with the White House during the early stages of the war under Joe Biden. But the return of Donald Trump brought a shift in approach: several phone calls and a face-to-face meeting in Alaska have suggested a desire to redefine the two powers’ relationship.
Advertisement
Image: Donald Trump replaced Joe Biden as US president in 2025. File pics: Reuters
Putin the man
As with Mr Zelenskyy, there is little doubt that four years of war have also taken a significant toll on Russia’s leader.
During his 2024 year-end press conference, he stated that the ongoing war in Ukraine had changed him, causing him to “joke less” and “almost stop laughing”.
Advertisement
He also said that his focus has shifted, stating his happiness would not be complete until all Russian forces return from the frontline.
Mr Putin also appears to have become more physically and socially isolated during the war, with fewer spontaneous public interactions and reduced foreign travel compared with pre-war years.
Paul Chuckle has said he feels the presence of his late brother Barry with him all the time as he opened up about the loss ahead of receiving his MBE.
The veteran entertainer, whose real name is Paul Elliott, found fame alongside Barry as one half of the Chuckle Brothers and the pair became a staple in British homes with their TV show ChuckleVision.
The 78-year-old said he knows Barry, who died from bone cancer aged 73 in 2018, is “there with me” and is always by his side. Speaking on ITV’s This Morning on Thursday (March 19) Paul said: “It’s just a lovely feeling right from since he’s passed away.
“You have dreams, everybody dreams at night. He was never in my dreams, because I was with him all the time. We were always together. But as soon as he died, from that day on, every dream I had, he was there with me doing stuff so I knew he was with me.”
Advertisement
Get MEN Premium now for just £1 HERE – or get involved in our WhatsApp group by clicking HERE. And don’t miss out on our brilliant selection of newsletters HERE.
Paul said that following his brother’s death he starred in a pantomime, marking his first performance without Barry in almost 55 years. He recounted standing backstage waiting for his cue, telling hosts Ben Shephard and Cat Deeley: “I thought, ‘I’m on my own’. And I looked across as, usually, Barry is at the other side of the stage.”
Paul said that whenever the duo performed together they would gesture to each other as they were waiting to go onstage, and added: “I swear that I saw him suddenly appear and I felt good then. I walked out, and the audience lifted me. I’ve never turned back since. And I just feel he’s there all the time.”
Paul also spoke about his recent fundraising efforts for charity Marie Curie, which saw him travel across the UK from John O’Groats to Land’s End, making stops in a two-seater pedal car, similar to the Chuckle Bike featured in ChuckleVision.
He said: “Punters would come along and want a picture with me in the bike, which was brilliant, because they grew up watching ChuckleVision. Every time they got in I said, ‘You know, Barry is with me. You’re sitting on his knee’ – because he always is (with me).”
When Cat said she felt it was ‘so lovely’ Paul could still feel his brother’s presence was ‘still with him’, to which he replied: “He’s here now.” Paul continued: “It’s been a lovely feeling since he’s passed away really – everybody dreams at night, but he was never in a dream when I was with him all the time. But when he’d died, from that day on, every dream I had he was there, so I knew he was with me…
Advertisement
‘Doing a pantomime after he died, I’d never been on stage on my own, it was always the two of us for 55 years, and I was standing waiting to go on… and I thought, “I’m on my own”.
Paul also hailed the charity, which he and his brother became official ambassadors for in 2016, as “wonderful”. The charity’s nurses provided end-of-life care for Barry, and Paul has previously spoken about how the nurses looked after his brother “with incredible care and kindness”.
Paul was recognised as a Member of the Order of the British Empire in the King’s New Year Honours list for his charitable service and his work with Marie Curie. “I had to read (the letter) four or five times. It was a wonderful feeling. I can’t wait to get it,” he added on This Morning.
Two separate studies saw significant benefits to ejaculating multiple times (Picture: Getty)
While you may have heard old wives’ tales about masturbation being bad for your health, according to science it’s actually the exact opposite.
Research shows that ejaculating as much as once every day can really limit the chances, while another study suggests a staggering 21 orgasms a month reduces a man’s likelihood of prostate cancer by 20%.
This comes as scientists recently revealed global deaths from the disease are likely to double in the next 20 years.
Orgasming 21 times a month yields impressive results for disease prevention, compared to men who come just four to seven times a month, who have a higher chance of getting prostate cancer.
Advertisement
The study, published in European Urology followed 32,000 men for 18 years and found that the more they came, the lower the risk of cancer.
Harvard Medical School and Brigham and Women Hospital scientists also found men reap the benefits from ‘me time’ or wet dreams, with daily ejaculation proving an effective form of masturbation or intercourse.
Masturbation could be a great way to reduce the risk of prostate cancer (picture: Getty Images/iStockphoto)
We wish we could tell you why this is the case but the experts aren’t exactly sure. They have theorised though, and Dr. Anne Calvaresi, the chair of the Urology Care Foundation’s Prostate Health Committee, suggests ejaculation may protect the prostate by flushing out harmful chemicals that build up in semen.
She also explains it is possible men who ejaculate more may have healthier lifestyle habits that decrease their odds of being diagnosed with the disease.
Sign up to The Hook-Up, Metro’s sex and dating newsletter
Love reading juicy stories like this? Need some tips for how to spice things up in the bedroom?
Advertisement
Sign up to The Hook-Up and we’ll slide into your inbox every week with all the latest sex and dating stories from Metro. We can’t wait for you to join us!
So, if you’re looking to up your orgasm quota, we’ve enlisted the help of Dr Gigi Engle, certified sexologist and sex expert at sextoys.co.uk, to give you some interesting ways to spice up your solo masturbation.
Advertisement
Your penis will thank you for…
Staying hydrated: Proper hydration supports blood flow and other bodily functions, including sexual performance
Changing underwear daily: Wearing clean underwear helps prevent the buildup of bacteria and keeps you feeling fresh
Getting enough sleep: Quality sleep is important for hormone balance, including testosterone production
Using mild soaps: When cleaning the genital area, opt for mild, fragrance-free soaps to avoid skin irritation and maintain the natural PH balance
First step first, Gigi says to get the prostate involved and it’s something you can do solo or with your other half.
‘Men can have prostate orgasms without stimulation to the penis. The orgasm from your prostate is a full body orgasm, and you feel a tingly sensation all over,’ Gigi tells Metro.
Advertisement
‘To reach it, you insert a finger or toy into the rectum, hooking up towards the belly button. The prostate feels like a rough-textured gland. The receiving partner may enjoy a variety of different types of prostate stimulation – varying from circular motions, to in-and-out penetration. It’s highly subjective and different people enjoy different things.’
Next Gigi suggests using a masturbation sleeve and recommends the Tenga Flex.
‘It has a ribbed and grooved design to help men enjoy masturbation to the fullest extent. This toy has all the manoeuvrability of jelly toys, with much easier disinfection and better quality material. Simply apply lubricant, and slip the sleeve over your member,’ says Gigi.
If you find you’re flagging a little, take yourself into a different room rather than the bedroom because different surroundings can really help your sex drive.
Advertisement
Gigi explains: ‘The bedroom might be the simplest place to get it on, but a change of scenery can really up the fire on your sexual mood.
‘Going outside the bedroom can give us taste of the unknown that we crave. Humans really need novelty to keep their sexual interest high.’
Prostate cancer: The facts
The prostate is a gland. It is usually the size and shape of a walnut and grows bigger as you get older. It sits underneath the bladder and surrounds the urethra, which is the tube that carries urine (wee) out of the body. The prostate’s main job is to help make semen – the fluid that carries sperm.
Prostate cancer can develop when cells in the prostate start to grow in an uncontrolled way.
Advertisement
Some prostate cancer grows too slowly to cause any problems or affect how long you live. Because of this, many men with prostate cancer will never need any treatment.
But some prostate cancer grows quickly and is more likely to spread. This is more likely to cause problems and needs treatment to stop it spreading.
In the UK, about 1 in 8 men will be diagnosed with prostate cancer in their lifetime. We don’t know exactly what causes prostate cancer but there are some things that may mean you are more likely to get it – these are called risk factors.
There are three main prostate cancer risk factors, which are things you can’t change. These are:
Rebecca Davies bravely stood up to describe the cruelty inflicted on her by drum teacher Ben Coffey who frequently told her to die and kill herself.
13:18, 19 Mar 2026Updated 13:19, 19 Mar 2026
Advertisement
A brave woman has stood up in court to recount the horrific abuse she endured at the hands of her former partner in a harrowing victim impact statement.
Rebecca Davies took to the stand at Swansea Crown Court to detail how “cruel” drum teacher Ben Coffey treated her during his sentencing on Monday, March 2.
She said: “He told me to die. He told me to crash my car. He told me I deserved to get cancer and suffer slowly…Even now I struggle to look at myself in the mirror without hearing the words that were used against me, some of which included being called fat, spotty, gormless and disgusting.”
Rebecca was made to feel worthless by controlling Coffey during their four-year relationship which spanned between 2021 and 2025. Coffey – who taught at Roo’s Rhythm Drum School based in Neath, South Wales – repeatedly told her to kill herself, isolated her from her family and friends, and even locked her out of her home.
Advertisement
One incident saw Rebecca left with a black eye after Coffey had hit her after he had returned home from a night out, reports WalesOnline.
In another, Coffey was said to have become angry just because there was not enough laundry detergent. The resulting outburst saw Coffey throw the bottle at Rebecca before punching her and telling her that he didn’t care if he went to jail.
Coffey, of no fixed abode, pleaded guilty to three counts of assault by beating and one count of coercive control in January. Roo’s Rhythm Drum School shut down on February 1 according to its Facebook page.
Advertisement
He was jailed for 18 months and handed a 10-year restraining order preventing him from contacting Rebecca during sentencing.
Reading her statement during the hearing, Rebecca said: “It is incredibly difficult to put these experiences into words, because for so long I lived behind a mask, pretending everything was fine while silently falling apart. To everyone on the outside, our relationship looked perfect.
“People saw smiles, photos, and moments that looked loving and stable. But behind closed doors, I was breaking piece by piece, losing myself without even realising at the time.
“I was made to feel worthless and constantly walking on eggshells all while others admired the image he presented. I never knew when the next outburst or threat would come.
Advertisement
“While others saw a loving partner I was blamed, insulted and broken down.
“He convinced people, including myself that I was the problem, which made the abuse even harder to speak about. I felt invisible, isolated and terrified – like no-one would ever believe me.
“Although the relationship included occasional positive moments, these typically occurred after moments of conflict. This pattern contributed to emotional confusion and instability rather than a genuine sense of stability or joy. With every insult, punch and slap I received, I lost part of me.”
Rebecca also described an occasion where a black eye he had given her prevented her from going to work. It was just one example of how his vile actions impacted her career and personal life outside of the relationship.
Advertisement
She said: “What I experienced had caused me to become isolated from friends and family and restricted my independence.
“I altered my behaviour in order to manage the abuse and avoid further harm, which at the time led to withdrawal from social contact…The behaviour had a serious and ongoing impact on my employment and financial stability. Due to Ben’s controlling behaviour and unreliability, I was frequently left without childcare at short notice as he would leave the house despite agreeing to have our daughter in advance.
“This resulted in me having to cancel work shifts unexpectedly. In addition, the anxiety caused by the abuse affected my ability to attend work consistently.
“I lost income as a result and faced pressure and scrutiny at work consistently. I lost income as a result and faced pressure and scrutiny at work, placing my employment at potential risk.
Advertisement
“On one occasion I had no choice but to cancel shifts, to hide the black eye I had received, again to hide what had happened and defend his actions. The financial instability caused by his behaviour further increased my stress.”
Rebecca also told the court that Coffey would degrade her and that it reached a point where she was left with low confidence and a fragile sense of identity.
She continued: “The abuse I experienced was sustained coercive and controlling behaviour, the seriousness of which I did not fully recognise at the time. I was subjected to ongoing psychological abuse, intimidation, manipulation and degradation that gradually broke down my confidence, independence and sense of identity.
“I was repeatedly told to die and kill myself. I was always consistently made to believe that I was the problem in the relationship and that my reactions were due to my own mental health rather than the abuse I was experiencing.
Advertisement
“I was led to believe that I needed antidepressants to numb me and that there was something wrong with me, rather than recognising that I was reacting to prolonged emotional harm.
“I was subjected to repeated verbal abuse about my appearance and worth. Even now I struggle to look at myself in the mirror without hearing the words that were used against me, some of which included being called fat, spotty, gormless and disgusting.
“These words have stayed with me and caused lasting damage to my self-esteem and self-worth.”
Even once the relationship ended, Coffey’s abuse continued.
Advertisement
She said: “It changed in form and in many ways it got worse. He continued sending me abusive messages and voice notes – sometimes daily. He told me to die; to kill myself. Over and over and over. The cruelty became relentless.”
Rebecca also detailed how she continued to endure psychological pain in the form of anxiety, sleep trouble and intrusive thoughts after she left Coffey.
She continued: “He told me to die. He told me to crash my car. He told me I deserved to get cancer and suffer slowly – knowing I had been through it personally with my mum going through a cancer diagnosis shortly before I met him.
“Hearing those words from someone who was supposed to love and care about me didn’t just hurt; it broke something inside me each time it was said. Those words carved wounds that no-one else can see, but which I feel every single day.”
Advertisement
On top of navigating her own emotional scars, Rebecca said she also worried about what impact the abuse towards her would have on her two daughters.
“As a mother the pain runs even deeper,” she read. “One of the most distressing aspects of this abuse is the guilt I carry knowing that my daughters witnessed the effects of it…This guilt continues to affect me deeply.
“Everything I do is now driven by my determination to keep my two daughters safe and far away from the kind of behaviour I endured.
“I worry about what they saw, what they felt and what they might remember. I’m trying to heal wounds that no-one should ever be given while also trying to be the strong stable mother they deserve.”
Advertisement
Reflecting on her ordeal and looking towards the future, she stated: “This was not a single incident but a sustained pattern of behaviour that affected every single aspect of my life.
“At the time I did not fully understand the seriousness of the abuse, which reflects the extent of the psychological manipulation and control involved.
“The long term impact has been devastating. My mental health, my trust, my confidence – everything was damaged.
“The lasting impact includes damage to my mental wellbeing, my confidence as a parent, my financial security and my sense of self.
Advertisement
“Despite everything I am trying to rebuild my life. Slowly, painfully, but with determination. I am trying to reclaim my voice, my strength and the parts of myself that he tried to destroy.”
Get more Daily Record exclusives by signing up for free to Google’s preferred sources. Click HERE.
There are heavy delays around the A688/South Church Road roundabout after the incident as police remain on scene.
AA Traffic Maps are showing heavy traffic along the A688 on approach to the roundabout.
AA Traffic maps is showing heavy delays in the area (Image: AA TRAFFIC MAPS)
A spokesperson for Durham Constabulary said: “Please be aware, a large trailer has tipped on the roundabout at South Church as displayed below – officers will shortly be closing the road if the area can be avoided.”
Afroman, best known for his 2000 hit Because I Got High, responded by using home security footage in viral videos that ridiculed the deputies. His video for the song Lemon Pound Cake was inspired by a deputy apparently eyeing a cake in his kitchen, while another video attributed personal and sexual transgressions to the officers.
Customers have left scathing reviews of The Farmer’s Dog in Oxfordshire, with one diner claiming their 30th birthday meal felt like a ‘production line’
Jeremy’s transformation of the venue into its current form was documented on his Amazon Prime Video programme Clarkson’s Farm. Since opening, thousands of viewers have visited the premises. However, it has faced a string of critical reviews.
On Tripadvisor, they posted: “No ambience, felt like a production line, head em up, move em out, was like being served by robots.
“No acknowledgement of his birthday even though I stated it when booking. Really disappointing for a special birthday, it was a let down.”
“Won’t be returning or recommending like I have in the past. This was like going to a cafe or McDonald’s – in fact I’ve probably sat longer in a fast food outlet than here for a special meal.”
Another critic commented: “Over £25 for a pie? Rip off. Without the star name it would be only a nice pub.”
A third reviewer took issue with the venue’s cashless payment system. They posted: “Lovely place but doesn’t support the British pound, as in card only, disappointing.” Another diner advised people to “save their money” by avoiding the establishment.
They commented: “Both ordered pork and it arrived in less than 10 minutes (not a good sign) and was nearly cold, meat was so dry, the singular carrot was hardly cooked, potatoes like mush and Yorkshire pudding so dry it was crumbling.
Advertisement
“There was no crackling as written on the menu. We weren’t asked once if we had enjoyed the food.
“It seems they value churning food out, over any sort of quality. Really disappointing.”
Other patrons, however, have been impressed by the venue. One remarked: “For our mains two of us had the sausage and mash and they were some of the best sausages we have eaten. The mash was smooth, light and delicious.
Advertisement
“The other member of our party had the steak pie which was full of meat and gravy and again extremely tasty. The food may have cost a little more than you would normally pay but you get what you pay for, fresh, local produce. We felt it was well worth the money.”
Another visitor noted: “My partner and I had booked The Farmers dog, of course because of the TV show. I was a little apprehensive as with somewhere so hyped there’s always the chance it will be terrible in reality.
“I needn’t have worried. We arrived early so we had time to go into the Grand Tour tent/shop which we found to be well stocked and the staff there were lovely and friendly.”
Advertisement
Jeremy Clarkson’s representatives have been contacted for comment.
What is it about Gail’s that raises the hackles of Londoners? It depends on who you ask. Some deride the bakery chain as Greggs for posh people; a yummy mummy Mecca where the jam is organic and the oat lattes are reassuringly expensive. For others, Gail’s is a bellwether of gentrification and a venture capital backed Goliath which independent cafés fear. More recently, it has been boycotted by pro-Palestine protesters over its supposed links to Israel.
For one of its co-founders, Tom Molnar, the furore is confusing. “We’re just a bakery, you know?” he shrugged in an interview last year. So how did just a bakery become a political football, whose £5 sourdough divides the chattering classes?
When a new branch of Gail’s opened in Archway, north London in February, it presented a confusing sight for passers-by. There was the cherry red awning, the pristine window display stacked with sourdough loaves, and a pastel-coloured sign outside advertising elderflower iced matcha. It was all perfectly curated quaintness.
Yet one morning, staff arrived to find that someone had taken a hammer to all of the windows in the night. Red graffiti was daubed across the walls, instructing Archway’s inhabitants to “Reject corporate Zionism”, boycott Gail’s and “support local businesses”. The week before, “Free Gaza” had been spray painted on one of the walls. Staff said they were scared to come into work, wondering what it could be next. “We want to serve the best possible food to our communities, and the vandalism we experienced in Archway serves as a distraction from doing just that,” said Molnar in a statement to the Standard.
Advertisement
In its first week of opening, Gail’s Archway had its windows smashed and its walls sprayed with graffiti
This week, in a now-amended Guardian column, journalist Jonathan Liew wrote that the “very presence” of Gail’s in Archway, a stone’s throw from an independent Palestinian café, felt like “an act of heavy-handed high-street aggression”. The claim sparked accusations of antisemitism from across the political spectrum, and led a pro-Israel campaign group to organise a protest outside the Guardian’s offices. Attendees toted Gail’s paper bags in a show of solidarity.
The bakery is named after Gail Mejia, an Israeli businesswoman who moved to London in 1978. Mejia set up a wholesale bakery called The Bread Factory in the 1990s, which supplied bread to some of London’s top restaurants. In 2003, Mckinsey investors Molnar (from Florida) and Ran Avidan (from Tel Aviv) bought half of the business, and two years later the trio opened the first Gail’s branded bakery on Hampstead High Street. From the beginning, the brand identity was strong. Employees were, and still are, called “breadheads”, and the interiors were designed to look artisanal and eclectic, with oak countertops and exposed brick walls. “Even the guacamole is handmade here,” Avidan said proudly in a 2007 interview. The plan was clear: Avidan said they wanted to open “as many shops as we can, as fast as we can, as long as we can stick to what we believe in”.
On some corners of the internet, the fact that two of the founders of Gail’s are Israeli is enough grounds for a boycott. In one Instagram video with over 1,700 likes, a man walks into a Gail’s and announces to the queueing customers: “Hey, just to make you aware, this is an Israeli-owned coffee shop.”
Advertisement
Gail’s has said in statements that it is “a British business with no specific connections to any country or government outside the UK”. Mejia and Avidan are no longer involved in the business, but subsequent investors have brought fresh controversies. Mejia was bought out in 2011 by Luke Johnson, the former chairman of Patisserie Valerie, which collapsed in 2019 after alleged accounting fraud. Johnson often posts on X about things which he thinks are nonsense: the Covid lockdown, net zero, and the “disease” of woke that has infected everything from universities and corporations to the Financial Times. He also hates Sadiq Khan. “London has had a Muslim socialist mayor since 2016. It’s like a city committing slow suicide,” he posted last year. In late 2023, the barrister Jolyon Maugham called for a boycott of Gail’s over Johnson’s views. He even offered to send one of his X followers some sourdough starter to help wean them off the bread.
A 500-million-pound behemoth
Since 2021, the chain has been majority owned by Bain Capital, an American private investment firm which bought Avidan’s stake and a proportion of Johnson’s. In the intervening years, it has rapidly expanded. When Bain invested, there were 73 Gail’s across England and the company was estimated to be worth £200 million. Now there are around 200, with plans for 40 more this year. When Gail’s enlisted Goldman Sachs to drive further investment in 2024, the company’s estimated value had ballooned to £500m.
Before the Archway branch had its windows smashed, there was a protest outside organised by Islington Palestine Solidarity Campaign. The organisers have said that their protest had “nothing to do with the fact that Gail’s founders are Israeli”, nor were they responsible for the vandalism. Rather, they objected to Bain Capital’s “predatory growth model” which harms local businesses, and the fact that it invests in Israeli tech and cybersecurity companies.
Advertisement
Second to the politics are the price tags. Gail’s is comfortably at the upper end of London’s flat white index with its £4.10 offering — though it is no more expensive than comparable upmarket chains like Rosslyn and Redemption Roasters. Gail’s says that it is committed to quality, even if it comes at a higher price. The milk they use comes from a family-run farm in Lancaster, while their beans are sourced by London-based Union Coffee.
Gail’s £4.10 flat white is on par with other upmarket chains
Gail’s
Molnar has said that the rapid expansion of Gail’s is happening because “we need more points of sale for good bread”. And in the world of good bread, £4.80 for a sourdough loaf is actually quite reasonable. A similar loaf from popular east London bakery The Dusty Knuckle will set you back £5.80, while M&S’s “craft collection” signature sourdough costs up to £5.75.
Its stores may have sprouted up across the breadth of England, from Essex to Ellesmere Port, but Gail’s still identifies as a “neighbourhood bakery” and paints a cutesy image of itself. “Whilst we are ordinary people, we want to make extraordinary things,” intones the About Us page on the website. All the loaves are “lovingly crafted”, and Gail’s stated raison d’être is to “bring humanity back into the food world, and back to local communities”. Most locations are partnered with local charities who they donate leftover food to, though staff say that lots of sandwiches have to be thrown out each day, as they are not kept refrigerated. This makes them taste better but means they can only be on display for a few hours.
Advertisement
Molnar is insistent that Gail’s branches are called bakeries (he repeatedly corrected a podcast host, who kept calling them “stores”), though it is something of a technicality. While the muffins and sandwiches are prepared in-store, the bread and most of the pastries and cakes are baked in a factory on an industrial estate in Hendon — or in Gail’s lingo, “our central craft bakery”.
“I definitely don’t see them as a neighbourhood bakery,” says Sanne Wigbels. In November last year, a Gail’s opened directly opposite Wigbels’ plant shop and café, Ivy and the Wolf, in Crystal Palace. “A chain that opens up large scale cafés in areas which are already saturated with cafés and bakeries is not a neighbourly thing,” she says. Wigbels’ main concern is that the arrival of Gail’s has “opened the door for bigger businesses that have deeper pockets and can afford longer term rents”, which would in turn drive up rent for others. Molnar told the Standard: “we believe a healthy high street is a diverse one made up of many different businesses”.
Protests and efficiency drives
Gail’s used to be concentrated in leafy west London neighbourhoods, where it earned its reputation as a bakery for posh people. When top brass are scouting out new locations, farmer’s markets and schools are green flags they look for. But really, anywhere will do nowadays — even Gatwick airport. Beyond the prices, there is a sense that Gail’s is designed to cater for a certain stratum of the English bourgeoisie. According to Milla, a former barista at Gail’s East Sheen, her branch was a hotbed for “yoga mummies”, who would come in to “drop their children on the floor together and have a coffee”. Perhaps that image is why the residents of Walthamstow (once named the “coolest” neighbourhood in the UK) objected so strongly to the arrival of a Gail’s in 2024. A petition against the bakery opening received over 1,800 signatures from locals, who felt it would take away from the character of their high street. Earlier that summer, the Liberal Democrats had used the chain as part of its election strategy. When looking for seats they might win from the Tories, one of the questions they asked was “Does it have a Gail’s?”
Advertisement
Gail’s now has around 200 locations across England
Since Bain took over, various processes have been implemented to make the bakeries as streamlined and profitable as possible. Staff must aim to fulfil each hot drink order within two minutes, and every week, managers are sent a “coffee efficiency report” for the store. “It made zero sense,” recalls Jake (not his real name), who worked as a barista at Gail’s in 2025. There was a screen above the coffee machine with orders which hadn’t yet been fulfilled, and a timer for each one — whether it was a single espresso or six drinks with different milks.
“During a rush, it would pressurise you to be sloppy and potentially mix up drinks, and it took out the more conversational, community-building part that Gail’s is supposedly meant to be preaching,” Jake says. A poor coffee efficiency score led to “unnecessary hounding” from the manager, and added time pressure the following week. Molnar told The Standard that Gail’s is focused on great service, and “like most in the hospitality industry we use delivery targets to support this.” For other baristas, the coffee timer did sometimes come in handy with impatient customers. “I’d get a lot of people that would be in my face and rude, or trying to grab someone else’s coffee,” recalls Milla. “I’d say, ‘You’ve been waiting for 1 minute 54 seconds, chill out.’”
Managers receive quarterly bonuses based on five key targets — one of them being the profitability of their branch. At busy London outlets, the turnover is high enough not to split hairs. But the Gail’s Jake worked at was in a sleepy commuter town and was under “constant financial strain”. Jake says that if it was quiet at the start of the week, his hours for later that week were often cut down. Or, on days with low footfall, “it would be strongly suggested that I could finish my shift early and lose out on two or three hours of work.” Gail’s assert that they “plan and publish rotas at least two weeks in advance so our employees can organise their time outside of work”.
Gail’s now has over 2,000 “breadheads” and turned over nearly £220m last year (up over 20 per cent from the year before), with an operating profit of £25m. Critics argue that the company uses investor money to overwhelm competition. Critics of the critics say that this is just an aversion to success and growth — and at what point does a bakery’s multiplication become unacceptable? Cult favourite Pophams has three branches across east London, but what about Buns From Home, which has opened over 20 locations across the city in the past few years?
Advertisement
The woman who gave her name to Gail’s now lives a quiet life in Portugal with her husband. In a rare interview with Airmail a couple of years ago, Mejia said she found the idea that Gail’s was a gentrifying force “uniquely distasteful”. She accepts that “not everything is perfect” (she said that the coffee was “shit”) but ultimately, love it or hate it, Gail’s has a captive audience. “It’s insanely successful,” she said. “You can’t argue with that.”
Liam Rosenior’s side currently sit sixth in the division, three points adrift of fourth-placed Aston Villa, but several clubs are hot on their heels – including Everton.
The Toffees, led by David Moyes, are pushing for a potential first European campaign in a decade.
They lost 2-0 at league leaders Arsenal last time out but remained eighth in the table, with just five points between themselves and Chelsea before kick-off.
Both sides have been dealing with injuries in key defensive positions recently, which could make for a free-scoring affair on Merseyside.
Advertisement
Date, kick-off time and venue
Everton vs Chelsea is scheduled for a 5.30pm GMT kick-off on Saturday, March 21, 2026.
The match will take place at the Hill Dickinson Stadium.
Where to watch Everton vs Chelsea
Advertisement
TV channel: In the UK, the game will be televised live on Sky Sports, with coverage starting on Sky Sports Main Event at 5pm GMT.
Live stream: Sky Sports subscribers can also catch the contest live online via the Sky Go app.
Live blog: You can follow all the action on matchday via Standard Sport’s live blog.
Everton vs Chelsea team news
Advertisement
Everton were unexpectedly missing first-choice centre-back duo James Tarkowski and Jarrad Branthwaite for their visit to the Emirates Stadium last Saturday, and Moyes kept his cards close to his chest both pre- and post-match, insisting he had “nothing to say about them” at full-time.
It is believed that Branthwaite’s workload is being managed after he missed the first several months of the campaign with a hamstring injury.
Tarkowski, meanwhile, reportedly picked up an injury in training before the Arsenal trip.
If neither have sufficiently recovered by this weekend, the back-up pairing of Jake O’Brien and Michael Keane may be deployed again.
Advertisement
Elsewhere, there is a chance Charly Alcaraz could play a role but Jack Grealish is still expected to miss the remainder of the season with a stress fracture in his foot.
Tyrique George is ineligible to face his parent club, but former Chelsea midfielder Kiernan Dewsbury-Hall should keep his regular starting spot.
Regular: Kiernan Dewsbury-Hall
Getty Images
Advertisement
Rosenior said Chalobah, who has played the third-most minutes in all competitions for Chelsea this term, would be assessed on Wednesday, with an update expected later this week.
The Blues boss may have Malo Gusto to call upon for the trip to Merseyside, with the French full-back having missed the PSG game due to illness. Benoit Badiashile was also out with a bug.
Blow: Trevoh Chalobah
Getty Images
Everton vs Chelsea prediction
Advertisement
Much of how this match plays out will likely depend both on how each team bounces back from defeats in their most recent outings, as well as how each manager addresses their defensive issues and shortcomings.
Chelsea, who have now lost three in a row in all competitions, desperately need a win like the one they managed at Villa Park a few weeks ago to get their top-four challenge back on track before rivals pull too far away.
Their notably low tally of clean sheets under Rosenior (one in 14 league matches) suggests they may struggle to keep the Toffees out, so scoring against Everton – who beat Burnley in their last home game but have generally struggled when hosting the so-called bigger clubs this term – is a must.
The Toffees will be thinking similarly, particularly with backline absences for both sides, so we’re expecting a high-scoring evening that the visitors may just edge thanks to the comparatively superior quality of their attack.
Advertisement
Head to head (h2h) history and results
In the past 10 meetings between these clubs, Everton has won just twice: 1-0 in 2022, and 2-0 in 2023.
Both of those results came at their old stomping ground Goodison Park, where Chelsea – who have a much better recent home record against this opponent, including a 6-0 triumph in 2024 – actually emerged victorious from only one of their final eight visits (D2, L5).
The Toffees have been better on the road this term (W7, D3, L5) than at their new home (W5, D4, L6), though, and one of their six away losses came against the Blues in December.
Advertisement
Last season, the corresponding fixture last season ended in a goalless stalemate.
China is not currently planning to invade Taiwan next year, according to US spy agencies.
Instead of military intervention, Beijing is looking to gain control of the key island in the Pacific without force, an intelligence assessment states.
The annual report said that although Chinese Communist Party leaders did not plan to retake Taiwan by force, the People’s Liberation Army was developing its military capabilities that could be used in any bid to seize the island.
It read: “Chinese leaders do not currently plan to execute an invasion of Taiwan in 2027, nor do they have a fixed timeline for achieving unification.”
Advertisement
The assessment comes as Beijing ramps up pressure on Taiwan through frequent military drills in one of the world’s biggest potential flashpoints.
Image: Taiwanese briefing on China’s drills. Pic: Reuters
The Pentagon said last year that the US military believed China was preparing to be able to take Taiwan through “brute force” by 2027 – the centenary of the founding of its People’s Liberation Army (PLA).
But the latest report, released on Wednesday, said Beijing would prefer to ‘peacefully’ pursue its goal of ‘reunification’ with the democratically governed island.
“China, despite its threat to use force to compel unification if necessary and to counter what it sees as a US attempt to use Taiwan to undermine China’s rise, prefers to achieve unification without the use of force, if possible,” the report said.
Advertisement
It added that the PLA was making “steady but uneven” progress on the capabilities it could use to capture Taiwan.
Image: Explosive barrels placed by Taiwan military at the Tamsui river. Pic: Reuters
China’s foreign ministry responded to the report by saying that the US should correct its understanding of China and that resolving the Taiwan question was a matter for China only.
But Japan rejected claims in the report there had been a “significant shift” in Tokyo’s stance on Taiwan, after Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi said a Chinese attack on the island would launch a Japanese response.
Minoru Kihara, Japanese chief cabinet secretary, said: “The government’s position of judging an existential crisis situation with all the information it gathers is consistent with the past.
“The assessment that there has been a major shift is not accurate.”
China responded furiously to Ms Takaichi’s remarks that Japan would take military action in the event of a Chinese attack on Taiwan, urging its people not to travel to Japan and choking off some exports.
Ms Takaichi has maintained that her position – which increases the risk of a Chinse attack on Taiwan triggering a regional conflict – was consistent with longstanding Japanese policy.
The US report said: “China is employing multi-domain coercive pressure that probably will intensify through 2026, aimed both at punishing Japan and deterring other countries from making similar statements about their potential involvement in a Taiwan crisis.”
Three things you may have missed from China
Advertisement
US President Donald Trump, who delayed his planned trip to China at the end of this month over the Iran war, has repeatedly touted his “great relationship” with Chinese leader Xi Jinping and downplayed the threat of Chinese drills near Taiwan.
He said Mr Xi told him he will not attack Taiwan while the US president is in office, though Beijing has never confirmed this.
China views Taiwan – which was established in 1949 when the nationalist government retreated after Communist forces seized power on the mainland – as its own territory, and has never renounced the use of force to take the island.
Taiwan rejects Beijing’s sovereignty claims, saying only the island’s people can decide its future.
The police are continuing to search for the body of a missing man after the car entered the River Nene near Wisbech St Mary.
Cambridgeshire Police are continuing to search for a missing man after a car entered the River Nene on North Brink near Wisbech on Tuesday, March 17, at around 8.20pm. A specialist operations unit will be carrying out the search on the river on Thursday (March 19).
Advertisement
The car had five people aged between 16 and 19 in it at the time of the crash. Three people, two females and one male, were able to get out of the vehicle and were taken to Queen Elizabeth Hospital in King’s Lynn with non-life threatening injuries.
The police recovered the body of the missing teenage girl during the search on Wednesday (March 18). Detectives from the Serious Collision Investigation Unit are continuing to work with local enquiries.
A spokesperson for Cambridgeshire Police said: “Officers from our specialist operations unit will be on the river today and the search for the missing man will continue.
“In addition, detectives from our Serious Collision Investigation Unit will be supporting with local enquires and continued engagement with families and witnesses.”
Advertisement
The police are asking for anyone with information about the incident to come forward. You should contact the police quoting incident 515 of 17 March.
To get more news and top stories delivered directly to your phone, join our new WhatsApp community.Click this linkto receive your daily dose of CambridgeshireLive content.
We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don’t like our community, you can check out any time you like. If you’re curious, you can read ourPrivacy Notice.
You must be logged in to post a comment Login