Email exchanges allegedly between Sarah Ferguson and Jeffrey Epstein appear to have thrown new light on the relationship between the former Duchess of York and the disgraced late financier.
In the latest tranche of the Epstein files by the US Department of Justice, Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor’s former wife features in multiple email exchanges with the convicted sex offender, in which she discusses the Royal Family.
The mother of Princesses Beatrice and Eugenie also appears in photographs released in the Epstein files, alongside unidentified young women.
There are also some points in the email exchanges at which Epstein appears to ignore Ferguson’s emails, while she continues to urge him to reply.
Advertisement
Sarah Ferguson (right) pictured with an unknown female
US Department of Justice
Ferguson, who was married to Andrew until 1996, continued to live with the now former prince after their separation. The files have also included further mentions of her ex-husband, alongside images of him hunched over an unidentified woman on the floor.
Appearing in the Epstein files does not mean wrongdoing. Andrew has always denied the allegations made against him linked to Epstein.
Advertisement
Several charities have severed ties with Ferguson since her alleged correspondence with Epstein became public amid the Epstein scandal.
A statement released by the Ferguson’s spokesperson in in 2025 read: “The duchess spoke of her regret about her association with Epstein many years ago, and as they have always been, her first thoughts are with his victims.
“Like many people, she was taken in by his lies. As soon as she was aware of the extent of the allegations against him, she not only cut off contact but condemned him publicly, to the extent that he then threatened to sue her for defamation for associating him with paedophilia.”
Here are some of the things Ferguson allegedly discussed with Epstein that emerged in the latest tranche of documents.
Advertisement
During one exchange, an email address that simply identifies as “Sarah” appears to praise the disgraced financier and ask him to get married.
The email was sent six months after Epstein was released from prison after he served a 13-month sentence for child sex abuse convictions.
“You are a legend. I really don’t have the words to describe, my love, gratitude for your generosity and kindness. Xx I am at your service. Just marry me,” the sender writes.
It’s not the only time that the email address appears to hint at the idea of nuptials. In September 2009, an email from Sarah appears to refer to a woman with a “great body”.
Advertisement
“You can marry her too. She is single and a great body,” she writes, before adding: “Ok well Marry me and then we will employ her.”
US Department of Justice
2. “Brother I always wished for”
In 2009, Sarah heaped further praise on Epstein in another email dated August 3.
In the message, the sender appears to suggest that Epstein helped with a number of brand deals, including with the apparel brand Tommy Hilfiger.
Advertisement
“In just one week, after your lunch, it seems the energy has lifted,” the writer says. The message then goes on to suggest Sarah brought her ‘girls’ to see Epstein, which would have been one month after his release from prison.
“I have never been more touched by a friends [sic] kindness than your compliment to me infront of my girls. Thank you Jeffrey for being the brother I have always wished for,” she wrote.
US Department of Justice
3. “Only friends with me to get to Andrew”
In another exchange in September 2011, a sender named Sarah appears to admit that the pair hadn’t kept in touch and even suggests she had been used.
Advertisement
Reaching out on BBM, (BlackBerry Messenger), Sarah congratulated Epstein after hearing he had welcomed a baby boy, before saying she had been hurt by him.
There has never been any public acknowledgement that Epstein had children, but this email chain would suggest that people in his inner circle were aware of at least one baby, who would now be a teenager.
The news, however, seems to have hit a nerve with Sarah.
“You have disappeared. I did not even know you were having a baby. It was s00000 crystal clear to me that you were only friends with me to get to Andrew. And that really hurt me deeply. More than you will know,” she wrote.
Advertisement
US Department of Defense
4. Lunch plans after prison with daughters
On July 27, 2009, Sarah sent an email discussing plans for lunch with Epstein.
“What address shall we come to. It will be myself, Beatrice and Eugenie. Are we having lunch?” she asks.
A little over a week earlier, Epstein had been freed from prison after serving a sentence for soliciting sex from underage girls as young as 14.
Advertisement
Sarah’s daughters would have been 19 and 20 years old at the time.
US Department of Justice
In July 2010, Sarah was left with “no words” after she claimed the UK press was “ready to exterminate” her.
Ferguson had been caught in a tabloid stitch-up, appearing to accept $500,000 in return for access to the then Prince Andrew, who was a UK trade envoy at the time.
Writing to Epstein after the scandal, she recalled how no woman ‘left the Royal family with her head”.
Advertisement
“As I predicted many many months ago, the british press is ready to exterminate me, and it seems that Price WaterhouseCoopers and the palace system are not equipped to deal with all of this huge wave of negativity.” she wrote. “Therefore I have to return to the uk, and be exterminated and face the thunderous music.”
“I am now 1000 percent being hung out to dry, just as I predicted you will see, the Press will have me exiled. I am totally on my own now. This is beyond scandalous and nobody can do anything,” she continued.
She added: “Just as I always said, no woman has ever left the royal family with her head, and the cannot behead me, therefore they will discredit me.”
US Department of Justice
In the email chain, she also said that Epstein was her “pillar.”
Advertisement
6. “I urgently need £20,000 for rent today”
In October 2009, Epstein appears to have emailed Sarah, informing her that there may be a “rat” leaking news of her money troubles to the press.
The same day, Sarah says the situation is being handled by her lawyer but she’s still facing money struggles.
“I urgently need 20,000 pounds for rent today. The landlord has threatened to go to the newspapers if I don’t pay. Any brainwaves?” she writes.
“It is getting more more and close. Aaaggh.”
Advertisement
It’s unclear whether there was any further correspondence following this.
US Department of Justice
7. Eugenie’s “sh**ging weekend”
In another 2010 communication, a redacted email address tells the convicted sex offender about Eugenie’s love life, who would have been 20 at the time.
Epstein writes “NY?” to which the redacted email replies: “Not sure yet. Just waiting for Eugenie to come back from a sh**ging weekend!!”
Advertisement
US Department of Justice
8. “Tea at the palace”
It appears that Sarah was also willing to pull strings to get Epstein into the upper echelons of the Royal house, including tea at St James’ Palace.
Epstein would receive invites to fancy gatherings from the Duchess.
One invite, sent by assistant Amanda Thirsk, wrote: “Beatrice, Eugenie and I would love to invite you to celebrate the 50 years of Papa/Andrew.”
Advertisement
US Department of Justice
9. Emails Jeffrey while he’s in prison
Ferguson also appears to have emailed Epstein while he was in prison, asking her for help with her business.
Epstein was released from prison on 22 July 2009 after serving 13 months of an 18-month sentence for soliciting a minor.
On June 14, less than a week before his release, she emails Epstein saying, “I need to ask you how I start The Mothers Army company so it can be commercial, how do I do that? Can you help me?”
Advertisement
Mothers Army is a company designed “to help amplify the voices of Mothers all over the world”, is listed in Ferguson’s name.
Epstein then gives her advice about finding five women who “will not get jealous of your success.”
Sarah then responds: “But Jeffrey what kind of women? You say 5.. I could get Joan Branson Jeanne, Geldof girlfriend Ghislaine Maxwell Liz Murdoch Ali, Bono wife, Just for kick offs…”
US Department of Justice
10. “Always on your team”
Advertisement
While many emails appear to conceal the identity of the sender, email chains could suggest that Epstein and Ferguson considered each other as close allies.
In August 2011, Epstein sends an email to an address only identified as ‘Ferg’ in which he writes: “when you first got in trouble, you said to me , jeffrey i know that as i told everyone youre either on the team or off I knew you were always on my team. that was right.”
The unidentified responder replies: “I am on yours and you on mine. With great love and strength.”
You can use your current bills to calculate what your future bills will be
The cost of energy is set to fall from April after Ofgem announced its new energy price cap. The typical dual fuel household will now pay £1,641 a year for their energy from April 1, 2026. That’s down from £1,758 based on the cap set on January 1, 2026.
Advertisement
That’s the typical household, however. You can use your current bills to estimate how much your bills will change by using our interactive calculator.
The price cap sets the maximum you can be charged for unit rates and standing charges – so your bill can be higher or lower than the price cap figure.
The average unit rate for gas is falling from 5.93p per kilowatt hour (kWh) to 5.74p per kWh, while the standing charge is decreasing from 35.09p a day to 29.09p. The average unit rate for electricity is falling from 27.69p per kWh to 24.67p per kWh. The standing charge is rising from 54.75p a day to 57.21p a day.
Tim Jarvis, Director General, Markets, at Ofgem, said: “Today’s announcement will be welcome news for many households. Wholesale energy prices have fallen in recent months, and we’re investing in our network to safeguard the future energy system. The main driver of today’s reduction is the change to policy costs announced by the Chancellor in the budget.
Advertisement
“Our focus at Ofgem remains on bearing down on the costs within our control, and unlocking the investment needed to support the transition to a more stable energy system over the longer term.
“We’re also seeing encouraging signs of greater engagement and competition, with switching increasing by almost 20% year on year. More households are choosing time‑of‑use tariffs that offer cheaper off‑peak rates, and suppliers are offering a wider range of products, including deals with savings at evenings or weekends.
“The price cap protects households from overpaying for energy, but it’s a safety net. Last year, consumers on fixed deals paid around £115 less than the cap on average, so we’d encourage people to speak to their supplier about the options available and consider whether a different tariff or payment method could help bring their bills down further.”
At the 2026 Bafta awards, big wins for independent British film I Swear and American horror film Sinners were overshadowed by a regrettable moment. Activist John Davidson said the N-word – arguably the most offensive slur in the English language due to the centuries of violence and oppression it carries – while Sinners’ stars Michael B. Jordan and Delroy Lindo were presenting an award.
Davidson, on whom the film I Swear is based, has Tourette syndrome – including coprolalia which causes the involuntary use of obscene and socially inappropriate words and phrases.
Jordon and Lindo looked shaken and have since expressed their discomfort and disappointment with Baftas’ handling of the situation. In an apology letter to Bafta members, the academy said it was launching a “comprehensive review” into the incident.
Since the incident, Davidson has received extensive online abuse, including accusations that he is a racist – an accusation that fails to consider that this was an involuntary audible compulsion. Davidson has stressed there was no intention behind the word, stating he was “deeply mortified if anyone considers my involuntary tics to be intentional or to carry any meaning”.
Advertisement
Two things can be true at the same time. While this incident was involuntary, that does not lessen the hurt or offence that Jordan, Lindo and members of the viewing public felt. No one could have prevented Davidson’s involuntary compulsion in the moment.
However, it could have been edited out of the delayed broadcast. In fact, a second slur was removed, but this one was missed. Doing so would have spared viewers from hearing the slur and helped protect Davidson and others with Tourette’s from the abuse that followed. It also could have reduced the spread of misinformation about the condition, which directly undermines the mission of I Swear to teach empathy and kindness towards people with Tourette syndrome.
By broadcasting the Baftas on a two-hour delay in a condensed format, the BBC assumes greater editorial responsibility than with live transmission. It must therefore meet higher standards and be able to justify its editing choices. The BBC failed to do that in this instance, causing undue harm to both black and disabled people.
Advertisement
There are two main reasons why the Baftas are broadcast at a delay. The first is engagement. The award ceremony lasts three hours, so to help make it less tedious, the broadcast is edited down to two hours.
The second is political. The BBC’s editorial guidelines require them to prevent harm and offence to viewers. Award shows are considered high-risk because they are live and broadcasters cannot control what winners say.
This is often called “the tyranny of live”. As media and communications scholar Paddy Scannell wrote, in live broadcasting “if something goes wrong, the best you can do is damage limitation, for once the words are out of your mouth they are in the public domain and they cannot be unsaid”.
Yet, by broadcasting at a delay to mitigate “the tyranny of live”, broadcasters open up a new can of editorial worms – “the tyranny of the edit”.
Advertisement
In live broadcasting, when things go wrong, they can often be blamed on live conditions. While this does not necessarily reduce any harm caused, it can reduce culpability. Once a programme has been edited, this no longer applies, raising the editorial standards and making broadcasters accountable for every word spoken and removed.
In other words, broadcasters must be able to justify every editorial choice to their audience, especially when those choices cause harm or censor a political perspective.
Reaction and lessons for the BBC
The BBC has apologised for broadcasting the slur and re-edited the programme for BBC iPlayer. Producers overseeing the coverage told the Guardian that they did not hear the N-word from the broadcast truck due to a technical issue. That would hardly be a reassuring defence of their actions.
Davidson later said that he was assured by Bafta that any swearing would be edited out of the broadcast, and that he felt “a wave of shame” over the incident. He also questioned the decision to seat him so close to a microphone.
Advertisement
The BBC has also offered no explanation for the post-production removal of sections of My Father’s Shadow director Akinola Davies Jr’s acceptance speech, including a statement of solidarity with “the economic migrant, the conflict migrant, those under occupation, dictatorship, persecution and those experiencing genocide” and the remark “free Palestine”.
Labour MP Dawn Butler has written to the BBC seeking a full explanation for these decisions.
Beyond the immediate fallout, this episode carries wider lessons for the BBC about learning from past errors. Last summer, the BBC was found to have broken harm and offence standards after airing “death, death to the IDF” chants in Bob Vylan’s Glastonbury set. After this incident, they promised to review their protocols around the livestreaming of “high-risk” events. Yet a similar misjudgement happened again.
To maintain public trust and support, the BBC must be more responsive in explaining their editorial choices – and more forthcoming when they get things wrong.
Cuba claims its military fired on a US speedboat that entered territorial waters, killing four people and injuring six in a confrontation on Friday
Antonio Scancariello and Laura Hill
20:05, 25 Feb 2026Updated 20:06, 25 Feb 2026
Cuban military forces have shot at an American boat, resulting in four fatalities and six casualties, according to emerging reports.
Cuba’s Ministry of Interior (MININT) announced today (February 25) that a US speedboat bearing the Florida registration FL7726SH was spotted approximately one nautical mile northeast of the El Pino Channel, near Cayo Falcones in Corralillo Municipality, Villa Clara.
Advertisement
According to the Home Office’s official account, hostilities erupted when the “violating” craft opened fire on Cuban border personnel, wounding the commander, after Border Guard Troops moved in to identify the vessel.
The statement confirmed the “offending boat opened fire against the Cuban personnel, causing the commander of Cuban vessel to be injured. As a result of the confrontation, at the time of this report, on the foreign side, four aggressors were killed and six were injured, who were evacuated and received medical assistance”.
Cuba’s Home Office further declared: “Cuba reaffirms its commitment to protecting its territorial waters, based on the principle that national defence is a fundamental pillar for the Cuban State in order to protect its sovereignty and stability in the region. Investigations are continuing by the competent authorities to fully clarify the facts.”, reports the Express.
The exchange of gunfire occurs against a backdrop of escalating tensions between the United States and the communist nation, separated by merely 100 miles (160 kilometres) of the Florida Straits, AFP reported. This development follows Washington’s decision to ease the near-total oil embargo on the island, initially imposed by President Donald Trump in January following the U.S. removal of Cuba’s key ally, Nicolas Maduro of Venezuela.
Advertisement
The agency further reported that prior to Maduro’s apprehension by U.S. forces on January 3, Cuba had depended on Venezuela for approximately half its fuel requirements.
In response to concerns from Caribbean leaders, who feared that depriving Cuba of oil would rapidly lead to economic collapse, Washington announced it would permit shipments of Venezuelan oil for “commercial and humanitarian use,” according to AFP.
Daniel Dubois refused a fist bump from world champion Fabio Wardley as the pair came face-to-face at a lively news conference in London.
The world title fight between two of Britain’s biggest punchers takes place at Manchester’s Co-op Live Arena on 9 May.
After some long-winded bickering between the two camps, the fighters – relatively restrained until that point – finally sparked into life.
Wardley said he would “flatten” the challenger. “My power is proven. If there’s time left on the clock, I’m taking you out of the fight,” he added.
Advertisement
The 31-year-old – with 19 stoppages in 20 wins – will make the first defence of his WBO crown, having claimed the ‘interim’ title against Joseph Parker before being upgraded to full champion when Oleksandr Usyk vacated the belt.
Former IBF champion Dubois, 28, is coming off a devastating knockout loss to generational great Usyk last summer.
“If you look back, when it gets dicey, he’s not up for it,” Wardley said of Dubois, who has faced accusations of folding too easily in his three stoppage defeats.
Wednesday’s news conference took place at Dutch Hall, a converted 16th-century church tucked away in the heart of the city.
Advertisement
Dubois – never one for lengthy monologues – kept his answers short and matter of fact.
But the Londoner was clear in his intention. “Victory by knockout, by any means necessary,” he said.
When the fighters eventually stepped forward for the obligatory face-off, Dubois looked away first as Wardley smirked.
Moments later Wardley extended his fist in a gesture of respect, but Dubois shook his head and refused to engage.
The former glamour model visited an aesthetics clinic on Tuesday with her husband Lee Andrews, where she splashed the cash on course of beauty treatments
20:04, 25 Feb 2026Updated 20:05, 25 Feb 2026
Katie Price has showed off her new face after booking in for a series of tweakments in Dubai. The former glamour model visited an aesthetics clinic on Tuesday with her husband Lee Andrews, where she splashed the cash on course of beauty treatments.
On Wednesday evening she posed for a glamorous selfie in front of the Burj Al Arab, telling fans she had enjoyed a “gorgeous dinner with a gorgeous view”. Katie wore her hair up and showed off her tan in a white dress, accessorising with some gold jewellery.
Ensure our latest headlines always appear at the top of your Google Search by making us a Preferred Source. Click here to activate or add us as your Preferred Source in your Google search settings.
The newlyweds both underwent aesthetic tweakments, with the clinic claiming on Instagramthat they have set out a “treatment plan” for Katie “over time” – suggesting she isn’t planning on coming back from her honeymoon any time soon.
Advertisement
Sharing a snap with Katie and Lee on Instagram, aesthetic practitioner Max McNiel wrote: “It was lovely to see you today @katieprice. It was great to have you both in clinic today & was lovely to meet you both!
“Thank you for trusting me to carry out your treatments & I look forward to seeing you both again soon. A full treatment plan for Katie has been set out to achieve best results overtime.”
It’s not yet known what the Pricey has done to herself, however the clinic says it specialises in ‘lip contouring’.
The mum-of-five, 47, promised fans she would come back to Blighty last week with her new husband, Lee, 43, who hasn’t stepped foot in the country since their bombshell wedding in Dubai.
Advertisement
After the shock nuptials, the former glamour model returned home to the UK on her own just days later – as her new husband explained she needed to see her children .
She then flew back out to Dubai for their ‘honeymoon’ after the businessman claimed he would come to the UK several times. However, the couple have now been in Dubai for several weeks.
Advertisement
Last night, the Pricey admitted she’d put on half a stone in weight since meeting Lee, who she teased was a “feeder”. Taking to her Instagram Stories on Tuesday evening, Katie told fans: “I have a confession to make. He is a feeder. I’ve been to the doctors and everything, asked them why… everyone’s saying how I’ve lost weight.”
“I’ve got to sort you out, I’m sorry,” Lee replied. “I’ve actually put on half a stone,” Katie continued. “You’ll be pleased to know I’ve put on half a stone because I can’t stop eating. And you’re eating for one, that’s the truth,” Lee said, referencing recent speculation that Katie was pregnant. She has since confirmed she isn’t. “I’m just comfy,” Katie concluded as the couple enjoyed their meal in Dubai.
Firefighters were called to the property in Church Lane, Thornton le Dale, at 12.45pm on Wednesday (February 25).
North Yorkshire Fire and Rescue Service said the crew from Pickering pumped the water out of the property and helped a Yorkshire Water engineer to isolate the burst main.
A service spokesperson said: “Crews used main pump, hard suction and a delivery pump to get water out of the property as well as a salvage sheet and small tools to assist a Yorkshire water engineer isolate the water.
Advertisement
“Once the water had stopped progressing into the property, crews left the incident.”
On 23 February 1981, a group of officers led by Tejero burst into the main chamber of the national parliament, wielding guns and threatening the politicians as a new government was being sworn in. Their aim was to return authoritarianism – six years after the death of the country’s dictator Francisco Franco.
York Central MP Rachael Maskell said the “web” surrounding child sex offender Jeffrey Epstein and his associates “must be brought to book”.
Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, whose royal titles were removed in October 2025, was a known associate of Epstein’s and stepped down from his role as UK trade envoy – a position he held from 2001 – in July 2011.
It came after details of his friendship emerged following Epstein’s 18-month prison sentence for soliciting a minor for prostitution in 2008.
Recommended reading:
Advertisement
Mr Mountbatten-Windsor was arrested on suspicion of misconduct in public office on Thursday (February 19).
He has since been released under investigation and has previously denied any wrongdoing.
Rachael Maskell MP has called for more to be made clear surrounding Andrew’s appointment and time spent as trade envoy, along with the
‘Privilege must not be protected’
In a parliamentary debate held on Tuesday (February 24), Ms Maskell said “unaccountable power must not hide, privilege must not be protected”.
The debate was brought to the House of Commons by the Liberal Democrats, who demanded all papers relating to the creation of Andrew’s role as trade envoy, along with minutes and communications on the vetting of the former prince, be made public.
Advertisement
The motion also requested correspondence relating to advice from – or provided to – Peter Mandelson, another associate of Epstein’s who was also arrested on suspicion of misconduct in public office on Monday (February 23).
‘This is the latest blow, in this shameful chapter’
The House passed the motion on Tuesday (February 24) without division.
Trade Minister Chris Bryant confirmed that the government will release the files “as soon as is practicable and possible within the law”.
He indicated that any documents potentially relating to the offence of misconduct in public office may be withheld.
Advertisement
Tom Gordon MP has welcomed the passing of his party’s motion in Parliament (Image: Supplied)
MP for Harrogate and Knaresborough, Tom Gordon, said he “welcomed” this news, which he said would “shine a light on Andrew’s dealings”.
He added: “This is the latest blow, in this shameful chapter.
“We’ll continue to call for transparency and restore trust in our political institutions.”
But Ms Maskell has called for more to be done.
Advertisement
She called the Liberal Democrats’ motion “narrow in scope”, adding: “Clearly the police investigation must take its course, and I am sure it will be deep and thorough because it runs so far, but ultimately, if we are just looking at the appointment, we must also ask about that period of time when Mr Mountbatten-Windsor carried out the role and the implications to wider networks.”
The death in Poynton is not being treated as suspicious
19:28, 25 Feb 2026Updated 19:28, 25 Feb 2026
Police sealed off a pathway and area of woodland on Tuesday night (February 24) after a woman was tragically found dead. Officers and paramedics attended the incident off Woodside Lane in Poynton, Stockport.
Emergency crews were called to the scene shortly after 7pm to concerns for welfare reports regarding a woman. A woman, aged in her 60s, was found dead at the scene.
A number of incident response units and police cars were seen stationed along Woodside Lane following the incident, with a walkway and wooded area also cordoned off by police who were standing guard amid investigations.
The death is not currently being treated as suspicious, Cheshire Constabulary said. A file is being prepared for the coroner.
A spokesperson for Cheshire Constabulary said: “At 7.05pm on Tuesday 24 February, police were called by paramedics to concerns for the welfare of a woman on Woodside, Poynton.
“Officers attended and sadly a woman in her sixties was declared dead at the scene. The death is not being treated as suspicious, and a case file will be prepared for the coroner.”