Connect with us

News Beat

US ‘deeply concerned’ after Chinese ‘super-embassy’ approved in London

Published

on

Starmer approves China ‘super-embassy’ in London despite major security fears and warnings from allies

US officials have said they are “deeply concerned” by Sir Keir Starmer’s decision to approve a Chinese “super embassy” in London, despite concerns raised by security experts and international allies.

The government gave the green light to a planning application on Tuesday, undeterred by warnings from MI5 that it cannot “eliminate every potential risk” posed by the new site.

The US is the latest UK ally to weigh in on the plans, amid growing tensions between Sir Keir and Donald Trump following the US president’s outburst over the Chagos Islands deal on Tuesday.

Following the approval of the embassy, a senior US official told The Telegraph that they were “deeply concerned about adversaries exploiting the critical infrastructure of our closest allies”.

Advertisement

Beijing’s proposals for the building are reported to include 208 secret rooms and a hidden chamber in the basement.

Those opposed to the plans fear the hidden chamber would be located in close proximity to data cables used by Britain’s financial industry for communications between the City of London and Canary Wharf.

Opponents of the new Chinese embassy have said they will continue their campaign through the courts

Opponents of the new Chinese embassy have said they will continue their campaign through the courts (PA Wire)

There are also concerns that the secret rooms could be used for the detention of dissidents who have fled China for safety in Britain.

Advertisement

The concern from the US comes after Labour MPs revealed on Monday that several other UK allies have raised fears about the plans.

Sarah Champion, chair of the international development select committee, said in an urgent Commons debate: “We’ve now had interventions from the Dutch government, Swiss parliament, Swedish parliament and two interventions from the White House about the risks posed to UK infrastructure by the cabling that runs along the Royal Mint Court.”

MI5 director general Sir Ken McCallum and GCHQ director Anne Keast-Butler, have warned ministers that national security risks cannot be wholly eliminated, but said intelligence agencies had created a “package of national security mitigations”.

Police officers outside Royal Mint Court, London, where China is set to build its new embassy

Advertisement
Police officers outside Royal Mint Court, London, where China is set to build its new embassy (PA Wire)

In a letter sent to the foreign secretary and home secretary, they said the package of mitigations – including measures for cabling.

These mitigations will be subject to regular review through a cross-government process, led at senior level in the Home Office.

Local government secretary Steve Reed approved plans for the building at Royal Mint Court, near the Tower of London, on Tuesday.

The decision came at the end of a long-running campaign against the proposals, which campaigners and MPs have said would provide a base for Chinese spying and security crackdowns.

Advertisement
MI5 director general Sir Ken McCallum and GCHQ director Anne Keast-Butler, have warned ministers that national security risks cannot be wholly eliminated at the site

MI5 director general Sir Ken McCallum and GCHQ director Anne Keast-Butler, have warned ministers that national security risks cannot be wholly eliminated at the site (Getty/iStock)

Luke de Pulford, head of the Inter-Parliamentary Alliance on China, told the Press Association: “Years of campaigning about the obvious and manifold risks posed by this embassy development have not been enough to outweigh the UK government’s desire for Beijing’s money.”

Despite these concerns, the government said the risks could be managed, and Security minister Dan Jarvis told MPs there were “national security advantages” to the plans, which will consolidate seven Chinese diplomatic buildings into one site.

He was “assured that the UK national security is protected” and any risks posed by the new embassy were being “appropriately managed”.

Advertisement

Earlier, the prime minister’s official spokesman told reporters that classified facilities were “a standard part of any significant diplomatic presence”, and hit back at opponents of the plans, branding them “either naive or recklessly isolationist”.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2025 Wordupnews.com