After a dry 2025 with the UK’s warmest summer on record, winter 2026 delivered something very different: rain for 50 days in a row in parts of Devon and Cornwall, one of the rainiest seasons on record and only 80% of average sunshine.
Scientists have given this a name: climate whiplash.
Climate whiplash describes rapid swings from one type of weather extreme to another, most commonly from really persistent drought to really persistent wet weather. Globally, such swings have increased in recent decades. Shorter-term whiplashes over a few months have become roughly a third to two-thirds more frequent, while year-to-year swings have increased by up to a third.
In Europe and the UK these swings tend to be driven by the jet stream, a fast-moving body of air higher up in the atmosphere. This winter, it was sat across the south of the UK and moved fast, blowing wet and windy weather from the northern Atlantic.
Advertisement
Weather often moves in “systems” – large rotating masses of similar air – and these systems effectively bump into one another like billiard balls. This winter, however, a large block of settled weather stayed in place across Europe. This acted like a barrier, causing the wet weather carried by the jet stream to slow down across the UK.
Will the UK whiplash back into drought?
Predicting what the UK’s summer will look like months in advance is challenging. Seasonal forecasting does exist, but it can’t tell us if it will rain on a particular day in July. What it can do is estimate the likelihood of certain weather trends – such as hotter or drier conditions – developing over the course of a season.
These forecasts are getting better. Under certain conditions, by May, scientists can now anticipate an increased risk of heat extremes in Europe that summer. Other research suggests that combined heat and drought extremes can sometimes be forecast one to two months ahead.
The European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts just released its forecast for June 2026, showing how summer temperatures might deviate from the long-term average across Europe. Warmer tones suggest a higher chance of above-average temperatures. ECMWF, CC BY-SA
Early indications for summer 2026 suggest that the UK will probably experience slightly drier than average conditions in early summer, with an added risk of extreme heat. That does not make a hot, dry summer inevitable. But it would be consistent with climate whiplash.
More broadly, climate projections suggest that the UK and much of Europe are likely to experience more of these “flipflop” weather patterns – persistent dry spells followed by months of downpours, or vice versa – as the world warms. Although a wet winter does not automatically lead to a dry summer, the jet stream is a key driver in all of our weather throughout the year.
Why this matters
Policy is still largely designed around averages, yet the weather is behaving less and less like an average year. If the UK is heading for an era of sharper swings between flood and drought, policymaking and adaptation systems will need to catch up.
Take housing and insurance, for example. Flood Re, the government’s reinsurance scheme that keeps flood cover affordable, is only eligible for houses built before January 2009. Since then, more than 100,000 new homes have been built-in high-risk flood areas – homes that may face rising premiums just as extreme rainfall increases.
Climate whiplash also threatens food security. Fields can be waterlogged when planting yet too dry and dusty as crops approach harvest, lowering the yields that are produced. Transport networks are similarly exposed: some rail lines were submerged during winter floods, only a few months after a summer drought caused lines nearby to buckle as the underlying soil dried up.
These events are signs of systems – from insurance to infrastructure – being tested by weather swinging between extremes harder and faster than ever.
Advertisement
The UK prepares for these risks through a process set out by the 2008 Climate Change Act, which requires regular assessments of how climate change will affect the country. Every five years the UK’s independent Climate Change Committee produces a risk assessment which the government must respond to.
The next assessment, due later in 2026, will land after a year of extremes. If the UK is indeed entering its whiplash era, the question is whether adaptation plans will keep up.
Still worth getting or should you wait till the next one? (Sony)
The Wednesday letters page defends Nintendo’s first party record on Switch 2, as one reader offers their opinion on the Marathon Sever Slam.
Games Inbox is a collection of our readers’ letters, comments, and opinions. To join in with the discussions yourself email gamecentral@metro.co.uk
Hardware options I’ve been watching all the news about memory prices rising and the PlayStation 6 being pushed back to who knows when and it’s left me unsure as to what to do, because I currently only have a PlayStation 4. Naturally, I don’t want to buy a PlayStation 5 just as it’s replaced by a new machine. But at the same time I don’t, as you can tell, care about getting the latest hardware just as it comes out.
Curious to know if anyone else is in the same boat, as I’ve kind of got three options: skip the generation entirely, get a Switch 2 instead, or get a PlayStation 5 and just end up late to the PlayStation 6 as well.
Advertisement
I previously didn’t give much thought to the Switch 2 option but given how well things like Resident Evil Requiem have apparently turned out I’m thinking that might be the best bet. I’ve only had a Wii before, so it’d be kind of interesting to take a break from Sony while the bigger picture sorts itself out. Gambon
Opposites attract Really looking forward to playing Pokémon Pokopia tomorrow. It wasn’t on my radar at all until I saw all the positive reviews and now I’m really excited to spend the weekend with it, especially as it’s something my wife will almost certainly enjoy as well.
Expert, exclusive gaming analysis
Sign up to the GameCentral newsletter for a unique take on the week in gaming, alongside the latest reviews and more. Delivered to your inbox every Saturday morning.
Advertisement
I got Resident Evil Requiem last week and loved that but at the end of the day it’s only 14 hours or so long and while I do want to replay it, it’s not something I want to do immediately. But a game that is apparently very long and involved, but also laid-back and ‘cosy’, sounds like the perfect follow-up.
Reminds me of the time Doom Eternal and Animal Crossing: New Horizons came out on the same day. Sometimes it’s nice to have a contrast, where the only similarity is that both games are good. Carson
Not a sprint Just passing on my thoughts about Marathon, I hope the full game sells well to keep Bungie alive, but I’m on the fence whether to buy it or not.
Advertisement
I played about six hours of the Marathon Server Slam. The base gameplay and shooting mechanics are great. I for one loved the graphic style too. However, I’m not sure I will bother with the full game due to it being an extraction shooter. For me, I just find it a bit too tedious; the missions are mundane. Each round you play is ~20 minutess and you only meet one or two teams of real players. I find it overly repetitive, similar to how Helldivers 2 was.
Now I don’t know if the full game will have deathmatch mode or something similar added, but if it does I would buy it nearly half to relive the old Halo 3 Slayer days. Carlos
Ooo, that’s a good one I really enjoyed the new Indie World Direct. I’m delighted by Heave Ho getting a sequel, the first is probably one of the funniest games for multiplayer.
Advertisement
Getting a shadow drop for Blue Prince is very welcome too, I did a lot in that game through Game Pass but will double dip on Switch 2.
That wood game looked adorable and I’m keen for anything from the Guacamelee developers.
Unbelievably though, I’m most excited by a game that was only in the Japanese version of the Direct. Öoo got an unexpected release and wasn’t featured in the Western stream. I’ve had my eye out for this since it came out on PC, so an unexpected shadow drop on Switch is brilliant news and may sway me away from Resident Evil Requiem, even though I want to finish that before Pokopia.
I know everyone wants to hear from Nintendo about their first party plans, but it’s nice to have such an overwhelming selection of brilliant third party indie and AAA games to enjoy in the meantime. Euclidian Boxes
Advertisement
GC: Thanks for mentioning that, we had no idea. It’s on the UK Nintendo eShop right now, so we’ll see if we can get a review done.
Something to look forward to The behaviour of FromSoftware towards Bloodborne truly is bizarre. They keep saying the game is special to them and everything, but they won’t even release a PlayStation 5 patch?! How does that make any sense whatsoever?
Mind you, I don’t understand why anyone is pushing for a remake either. The game’s a PlayStation 4 title, how much better do you expect it to look? Especially as From won’t do the remake themselves, so it’ll be missing lots of little details and secrets that only they know about.
Advertisement
What we need is a sequel, and soon. For all we know that’s what they’re working on but the way he talks about it I don’t think there’s any chance the director would be anyone other than Hidetaka Miyazaki. But he’s doing The Duskbloods at the moment, which implies no serious work has started on Bloodborne 2 yet.
So… I look forward to playing it in 2031, I guess? Or maybe 2035 for the 20th anniversary? Let’s at least hope they can make it by then. Gavin
User approval Congratulations to Capcom for scoring the highest rated user score on Resident Evil Requiem. I’ve only played a bit of it and I’ve so far played through the introduction, dispatched some zombies as Leon, and woke up in a very creepy medical centre.
I have to also commend Capcom for changing up the behaviours of zombies. A zombie that sings creepily, a maid zombie cleaning the floor, and a chef zombie with a chainsaw. Very unique and it’s very well deserved to see Requiem dethrone Clair Obscur: Expedition 33. Which is the better game is a topic that will divide fans and gamers, but that’s a topic for another day.
Advertisement
Crimson Desert is set to release in over two weeks, and I honestly can say I have no idea where the reviews will land, especially with the embargo lifting one day before release and by then my pre-order will be all but ready to be dispatched. I truly hope this is the next Elden Ring and Zelda: Breath Of The Wild, rather than the next Forspoken. It looks insane and if the execution is right it could be the perfect title to hold us off until GTA 6 releases.
I’ve also heard some rumblings of Cory Barlog’s next game. Starring Faye as the lead character and utilising a Devil May Cry style of combat gameplay. It’s certainly what I didn’t expect and didn’t ask for. But it’s unconfirmed for now, so I’ll wait until Cory clears the rumours up. But it seems quite a disappointment to me. I would have preferred something fresh instead. Not a live service title per se, but maybe an original story and a new set of characters.
Faye is only in God Of War Ragnarök for 10 minutes and considering I only saw her once in the game, when I came to her section, I don’t see a full title warranted. Freya would have been a better choice. Perhaps a prequel and her journey up to the events of the 2018 game. She’s one of my favourite characters, so I would have loved to see her have her own game. No one asked for Faye. But we’ll see and wait for confirmation.
On a final note, I’m absolutely stoked for the Fatal Frame 2 demo that drops in two days. I really hope this works as well as Silent Hill 2 and Resident Evil Requiem has. Then we can get the first and third games remade and on PC. Fingers crossed. Shahzaib Sadiq
Advertisement
Regular event The Indie World was fine and all but I can’t believe they couldn’t have found a fair few more games to promote. 15 minutes seems kind of pointless. If you’re going to try and make people sit down and watch a showcase at least make a proper go of it. 15 minutes is okay if it’s just one game but either this needed longer or they should do it on a more regular basis, like once every month.
I would be happy with that. I buy most indie games on Switch because it’s more convenient to play them like that, but while Nintendo does more to promote them than Sony it still doesn’t do much. Tosh
Don’t miss Gaming news! Add us as a Preferred Source
As a loyal GameCentral reader, we want to make sure you never miss our articles when searching for gaming stories. We have all the latest video games news, reviews, previews, and interviews, with a vibrant community of highly engaged readers.
Click here and tick Metro.co.uk to ensure you see stories from us first in Google Search.
Advertisement
GameCentral has been delivering unique games news and reviews for over a decade
What’s the big secret? Whilst I understand some of the frustration towards Nintendo I do feel it is somewhat overblown. I know people are keen for news on their big franchises such as Zelda and Mario. I’m in the same boat, myself. However, since the Switch 2 launched there’s many Nintendo exclusives that have released or are due soon, Mario Kart World, Donkey Kong Bananza, Drag x Drive, Kirby Air Riders, Fast Fusion, two Pokémon games, Metroid Prime 4, Yoshi And The Mysterious Book, and Hyrule Warriors: Age Of Imprisonment.
Granted, some of these are cross-generation and not all have been a hit. I get that the quality of certain games hasn’t been up the usual standard of what Nintendo usually produce and that gamers want to know what they are planning next. However, Nintendo have always seemed to keep things close to their chest and announce games only a short time from their launch date.
It’s still early days in the Switch 2 lifecycle and I’d argue they have been far more active in releasing new exclusives than Sony or Microsoft have been this generation. matc7884
Advertisement
GC: You’re right but at the same time Nintendo has never been quite this secretive before, without an obvious reason. It’s not even clear whether they’re consciously doing things differently or if they’re just letting the chips fall where they may.
Inbox also-rans It’s so weird to me that NieR:Automata is getting an Overwatch crossover and we still haven’t heard a peep about any kind of sequel. That game will be 10 years old next year! Focus
Would just like to see I got Minishoot’ Adventures a year or so ago and really loved it. Would definitely recommend it to others now it’s on console. Skimboat
The small print New Inbox updates appear every weekday morning, with special Hot Topic Inboxes at the weekend. Readers’ letters are used on merit and may be edited for length and content.
You can also submit your own 500 to 600-word Reader’s Feature at any time via email or our Submit Stuff page, which if used will be shown in the next available weekend slot.
You can also leave your comments below and don’t forget to follow us on Twitter.
A Cambridgeshire mum-of-two explains how spiralling pet costs force her to delay bills and turn off heating to afford specialist dog food and vet care
A mother of two has shared how escalating pet expenses have left her struggling to manage financially. The cost of specialised dog food and veterinary care has forced her to delay other payments and keep the heating off during winter.
Advertisement
Issabell Livesey, from Cambridgeshire, receives £1,542 monthly in Universal Credit and £180 from Child Benefit. She spends £1,000 on rent and between £150 and £200 on water and energy bills, leaving her with between £522 and £572 for other necessities.
Each month, she sets aside £150 for her two presa canarios, a large breed of dog, and these costs have significantly increased recently. She explained: “I prioritise my dogs’ care above all else. Between insurance, specialist food, flea and worm treatments, I’d say a significant chunk of my monthly allowance goes on them. The specialist food for Koubla and Xena has risen by nearly 20 percent over the past year, and emergency vet visits can cost over £150 in one go, which is almost a quarter of my monthly income.
“My pet bills are around £150 a month, which is a significant part of my Universal Credit, but they are family.”
Issabell has two children, Mika, 3, and Arvi, 5, and the household has been forced to maintain strict financial controls as their living expenses have climbed, reports the Mirror. The mum said: “As a parent of two with two big dogs, my budget is a jigsaw puzzle.
Advertisement
“Over the last few years, our food and energy bills have jumped by nearly 25 percent, meaning i have become an expert at ‘yellow sticker’ shopping and social tariffs just to make sure the kids and the dogs don’t feel the pinch.”
Those claiming benefits such as Universal Credit may wish to look into social tariffs.
These reduced-price mobile and broadband packages are accessible to individuals on low incomes or receiving certain benefits. Information about available tariffs can be found on the Ofcom website.
Advertisement
Issabell said she’s had to make considerable sacrifices to look after her two dogs. She explained: “I often delay paying utility bills, walk instead of using public transport, and keep the heating off during winter.
“It’s exhausting, but I can’t compromise on my dogs’ health – they are my emotional support and my lifeline.”
When questioned whether she’d ever consider rehoming her pets to cut her expenses, the mother was resolute: “No, absolutely not. Koubla and Xena are part of my family.
“Rehoming them would be devastating for all of us emotionally. I’d rather make sacrifices in my own life than see them suffer.”
Advertisement
She added: “My dogs are part of my family. They protect us and our home.”
Research conducted by lender Creditspring has shown that 59 percent of pet owners have faced escalating costs over the past year. This includes a 45 percent surge in routine veterinary expenses, whilst emergency treatment costs have risen by a third.
Less than three in 10 stated they would have adequate savings to cover an unexpected £500 expense.
Tamsin Powell, consumer finance expert at Creditspring, remarked: “Pets are part of the family and most owners will do whatever they can to keep them healthy. But when food, insurance and routine care are all rising at once – and an unexpected vet bill can run into the hundreds – it doesn’t take much for a household budget to tip into stress.
Advertisement
“Our research shows many pet owners would have to borrow, use a payment plan, or cut back elsewhere to cover a £500 treatment cost. Borrowing isn’t anyone’s first choice, but these numbers show how quickly a surprise cost becomes a crisis when people don’t have a buffer.”
But the expenditure is not financially, or logistically, sustainable.
Advertisement
An analysis by Kirsty Grieco, a security expert at the Stimson Centre in Washington DC, found the UAE had shot down an impressive 92% of Iranian missiles and drones including 165 ballistic missiles, 541 Shahed drones, and two cruise missiles.
Assuming it used its American-made Patriot or THAAD missile batteries – one of the few ground-based interceptor systems capable of downing Iran’s ballistic missiles – it is a high price compared to Iran’s.
A single patriot missile cost between $4-5m (export prices can be significantly higher), while an Iranian ballistic missile costs just $1-2m.
And when it comes to targeting Iran’s drones, the economics get even more dismal.
Advertisement
‘The maths clearly favours Iran’
Grieco estimates Iran spent in the region of $11m to $27m on the 541 drones it launched on the UAE, with interceptors averaging $500,000-$1.5m per drone to shoot down 506 of them.
The UAE’s drone defence costs were between $253M and $759M, suggesting itspent 20 to 30 times more defending itself against Iran’s drones than it cost the attacker launching them.
“The maths clearly favours Iran in this strategy of attrition because we don’t know exactly how many Shahed drones they might have in their stockpiles,” said Grieco.
Advertisement
“But it’s much larger than the combined total of the stockpile of interceptor missiles that are available.”
The race is on
Advertisement
The pressure that puts on the US and its allies may also now be influencing their tactical response.
“We’re now seeing sort of a race between Israel and the US trying to locate this drone infrastructure, to try to destroy it, to reduce the pressure on these interceptors, versus Iran trying to keep it an active, a mobile and active threat, and to be able to sustain this longer,” said Grieco.
It’s being reported that allies in the Middle East asking the US to replenish their supplies are being “stonewalled” by the Pentagon.
While the US military can bear the financial costs of its campaign, its ammunition stockpiles may not.
Advertisement
Trump said yesterday the US attack on Iran could last four to five weeks. But does he have the resources to do that?
‘Long-term strategic risk’
Leaks from the Pentagon ahead of the assault indicated it only had resources for an attack lasting week or two at most.
Analysts estimate that the US military may deploy up to 400 Tomahawk cruise missiles on ships and submarines sent to Iran.
Advertisement
That’s around 10% of the estimated 4,000 Tomahawks in the US military’s arsenal.
Stockpiles of its THAAD interceptor missiles are also thought be depleted. The US launched 150 THAAD missiles in its attack on Iran last June – about a quarter of its total inventory of 632.
While the Pentagon has moved to increase production of these and other missiles, replacement could take two or three years.
“We are using these interceptors at a rate that’s much faster than you can possibly replace them,” said Grieco.
“The US can choose to buy down short-term risk in the Middle East [by] devoting more interceptors to the conflict.
Advertisement
“The problem is that increases your long-term strategic risk. Particularly in other theatres because not only can you not replace these interceptors overnight, you can’t even replace them necessarily this year.”
America’s watchful adversaries
If the conflict continues, financial and logistical asymmetry of combatting Iran’s drones is a deadly one for Iran’s neighbours.
For the US, it’s less existential – it can sail away from the Middle East once it has run out of ammo.
Advertisement
However, America’s other enemies will be counting the rounds fired in this conflict too.
What’s to stop a “peer adversary” like China launching an attack on Taiwan, for example, if it knows the US won’t have the munitions to prevent it?
Draws with Leeds and Burnley ahead of Sunday’s derby defeat by Arsenal leave the Blues without a win in the league since they beat Wolves last month, and they will hope to get back to winning ways on return to the Midlands.
Liam Roseniors’ side have slipped to sixth in the Premier League as a result, though they can breathe fresh life into their push to qualify for the Champions League with three points against the Villans.
Unai Emery’s men, who sit fourth, come into the match reeling from a 2-0 defeat by Wolves, who sit bottom with just 13 points to their name.
It continues a rough patch of form for Villa, who have now won just one of their last six matches in all competitions.
Advertisement
Here is everything you need to know about the match…
Date, kick-off time and venue
Aston Villa vs Chelsea is scheduled for a 7.30pm GMT kick-off on Wednesday, March 4, 2026
The match will take place at Villa Park in Birmingham.
Advertisement
Where to watch Aston Villa vs Chelsea
TV channel: In the UK, the game will be televised live on TNT Sports 3, with coverage beginning at 7pm ahead of a 7.30pm kick-off.
Live stream: TNT Sports subscribers can also catch the contest live online via the Discovery+ app and website.
Live blog: You can follow all the action on matchday via Standard Sport’s live blog, with expert analysis from Dom Smith at the ground.
Advertisement
Aston Villa vs Chelsea team news
Rosenior said of his left-back: “Cucu is looking really good, if not for Wednesday then for Saturday [away at West Ham] for sure.”
Concerns allayed: Cole Palmer is available for selection despite appearing to pick up an injury against Arsenal
Chelsea FC via Getty Images
Estevao is back on the grass as he continues his recovery from a hamstring injury of his own, but is not expected to play a part on Wednesday.
Advertisement
It is not yet clear whether Dario Essugo can feature. He suffered a setback in his recovery from a thigh injury early in Rosenior’s tenure, but is back in first-team training.
Pedro Neto will miss the match as he serves his red card suspension, but Wesley Fofana has done his time after being sent off against Burnley and is available for selection.
Jamie Gittens and Levi Colwill are long-term absentees for the Blues.
Suspended: Pedro Neto
AFP via Getty Images
Advertisement
Midfield options are thin on the ground for Unai Emery, with Boubacar Kamara, Youri Tielemans and John McGinn all ruled out.
Liverpool loanee Harvey Elliott has hardly had a look in this season, but he will miss this match through an unspecified injury.
Andres Garcia completes the Villa absentees. He is expected to remain sidelined through April with a hamstring strain.
Aston Villa vs Chelsea prediction
Advertisement
The question of whether Chelsea can win at Villa Park may well be decided by the number of players they have on the pitch at full-time.
Facing Arsenal on Sunday, the Blues were not at their best, but they took the game to the Gunners and kept the league leaders honest. Until, that is, Pedro Neto was shown two yellow cards in quick succession.
Facing a Villa side who have only won one match since January, Chelsea should be more than capable of coming away with a result.
They have been their own worst enemy at times this season. Put on a composed, professional performance, though, and they can be confident of taking three points back to west London.
Advertisement
Head to head (h2h) history and results
At the double: Ollie Watkins hit a brace as Aston Villa beat Chelsea earlier this season
NEW YORK (AP) — Who says to beware the Ides of March?
A March 15 Academy Awards may feel late. By then, it will be almost a year since “Sinners” sunk its teeth into moviegoers last April. Some nominees have been on the campaign trail since the Cannes Film Festival in May.
But the upside of a prolonged Oscar race has meant some unexpected late drama. Think about the same movies long enough, and minds can change. For months, Paul Thomas Anderson’s “One Battle After Another” sailed through awards season, picking up prize after prize. But the wins for “Sinners” and Michael B. Jordan at Sunday’s Actor Awards — along with some other recent developments — have given the Oscar race what Smoke or Stack might call fresh blood.
An Academy Awards that had looked like a runaway might be a close call, after all. With Oscar voting ending Thursday, let’s survey the top categories
Advertisement
Best Picture
WHERE THINGS STAND
“One Battle After Another” has won at the Golden Globes, the BAFTAs, the Producers Guild and the Directors Guild. But its nearly unblemished record was shaken up at Sunday’s Actor Awards (formerly the SAG Awards), where “Sinners” took the top prize. You’d have to have quite a few rounds at the “Sinners” juke joint to convince yourself that anything else has much of a chance.
Advertisement
Andy Jurgensen, from left, Leonardo DiCaprio, Teyana Taylor, and Paul Thomas Anderson (AP Photo/Alastair Grant)
Advertisement
Andy Jurgensen, from left, Leonardo DiCaprio, Teyana Taylor, and Paul Thomas Anderson (AP Photo/Alastair Grant)
Advertisement
Advertisement
WHAT HAS THE EDGE
The tea leaves are strongest for Anderson’s “One Battle After Another.” The Producers Guild, which uses a preferential ballot like the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences does, is among the most predictive of bellwethers. Their winners have matched the last five years and in eight of the last 10 years.
Advertisement
The actors guild best ensemble prize, on the other hand, has a shaky track record. In the last 31 years, the SAG winner has matched the Oscar champ only 15 times. The win for “Sinners,” though, came right in the midst of Oscar voting. It was a good time to show out. So this race feels close to a coin flip, with a Warner Bros. movie on both sides. The awards season resume makes “One Battle After Another” the front-runner. But “Sinners,” even with a record-setting 16 Oscar nominations, gets to play the underdog.
Best Actor
WHERE THINGS STAND
This has been one of the most competitive and hard-to-call races of the season. Look at Leonardo DiCaprio. He gives one of the best performances of his career, in the best picture favorite, and he’s still a long shot. Instead, Timothée Chalamet was widely perceived as in the lead after early wins at the Globes and the Critics Choice Awards for his frenetic performance in “Marty Supreme.” But the BAFTAs muddied the waters (Robert Aramayo, not in the Oscar mix, was the unexpected winner). And “Sinners” star Michael B. Jordan, much to his surprise, won at the Actor Awards.
WHO HAS THE EDGE
Advertisement
Chalamet’s maybe meta campaign, full of swagger and braggadocio, rubbed some voters the wrong way. At the same time, many in the academy felt the 30-year-old should have won last year, for his Bob Dylan in “A Complete Unknown” — a year when he won with the actors guild but lost to Adrien Brody (“The Brutalist”) at the Oscars. Chalamet will hope the reverse happens this year. But the academy is notoriously resistant to rewarding young stars. Jordan, 39, isn’t much older. But it now suddenly feels like his moment.
Best Actress
WHERE THINGS STAND
Since the fall festival launch of “Hamnet,” Jessie Buckley has been the favorite. She’s won at the Globes, the BAFTAs and the Actor Awards. Her closest competition is probably Rose Byrne, who won at the Globes in the comedy/musical category for “If I Had Legs I’d Kick You.”
Advertisement
Jessie Buckley (Photo by Jordan Strauss/Invision/AP)
Advertisement
Jessie Buckley (Photo by Jordan Strauss/Invision/AP)
Advertisement
Advertisement
WHO HAS THE EDGE
This one’s easy. Fortunes have fluctuated in most of the top categories, but Buckley has been entrenched as the front-runner for months.
Advertisement
Best Supporting Actor
WHERE THINGS STAND
Sean Penn, a two-time Oscar winner, has done nearly no campaigning, yet he finds himself the favorite after winning at the Actor Awards and the BAFTAs. But several other nominees remain in the mix. Stellan Skarsgård (“Sentimental Value”) won at the Globes and is the kind of widely-liked veteran actor the academy likes to reward. But so is Delroy Lindo (“Sinners”), who was a surprise Oscar nominee. In the eyes of many, Lindo has quickly joined the contenders.
WHO HAS THE EDGE
Penn’s recent wins put him clearly in the lead, and he might stay there. But this remains a category rife with possibilities. The academy’s strong international leanings should help Skarsgård. And it wasn’t an accident that when “Sinners” won best ensemble at the Actor Awards, Lindo gave the acceptance speech.
Advertisement
Best Supporting Actress
WHERE THINGS STAND
This category has been all over the map. Teyana Taylor (“One Battle After Another”) won at the Globes. Wunmi Mosaku (“Sinners”) won at the BAFTAs. And Amy Madigan (“Weapons”) won at both the Actor Awards and the Critics Choice Awards.
Advertisement
Amy Madigan (Photo by Jordan Strauss/Invision/AP)
Amy Madigan (Photo by Jordan Strauss/Invision/AP)
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
WHO HAS THE EDGE
Any of those three could win. Two of them — Taylor and Mosaku — have the benefit of co-starring in films the academy obviously loves. “Sinners” and “One Battle After Another” have 29 nominations between them, while “Weapons” has only the one. Yet the 75-year-old Madigan, another celebrated character actor who’s been great for decades, has the momentum thanks to her charming Actors Award speech.
The six members of the Gulf Cooperation Council – Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Qatar, Bahrain, the United Arab Emirates and Oman – met in emergency session on Sunday to express solidarity and pledge to “take all necessary measures to defend their security and stability and to protect their territories, citizens, and residents, including the option of responding to the aggression.”
Earlier this year, an investigation and recall of patients connected to Leslie Irwin, a consultant orthopaedic surgeon who worked for the South Tyneside and Sunderland NHS Trust between 2001 and 2023, was launched.
Dozens of patients have come forward over recent weeks who have previously undergone surgery from Mr Irwin, 63, often on multiple occasions over several years.
Leslie Irwin (Image: SUPPLIED)
Spire Washington Hospital, where Mr Irwin also practiced, confirmed earlier this year that his work had been identified as being of “concern” and it had recalled a number of his former patients following an internal investigation into their care.
Mr Irwin retired from Sunderland Royal Hospital in May 2022, and despite Spire’s action against Irwin becoming public in January this year, South Tyneside and Sunderland NHS Foundation Trust said only that it was “considering any implications, the Trust is not currently recalling any patients”.
Advertisement
However, the NHS Trust has now significantly changed its stance, following widespread media reporting and a significant number of patients coming forward, and has confirmed it has sought the support of the Royal College of Surgeons in investigating the care Mr Irwin gave to patients.
Spire Hospital in Washington (Image: Stuart Boulton)
On Tuesday (March 3), the South Tyneside and Sunderland NHS Foundation Trust confirmed that it had brought in the Royal College of Surgeons to review work carried out by its orthopaedic surgery department.
A statement from the Trust said: “We are liaising with Spire in relation to concerns over Mr Leslie Irwin and are currently working through the details of which patients the Trust will need to review.
“We have also asked the Royal College of Surgeons to support us in this process. As part of this review, we will be in touch with any former patients directly and as a matter of priority.”
Advertisement
Separately, the Royal College of Surgeons has also revealed that it was instructed by the Trust to help with its review.
A spokesperson for the RCS said: “At the invitation of South Tyneside and Sunderland NHS Foundation Trust, the Royal College of Surgeons of England has been commissioned to carry out an invited review of a series of episodes of patient care relating to orthopaedic surgery at the Trust.
Sunderland Royal Hospital (Image: Stuart Boulton)
“Our invited reviews, which are advisory, enable expert teams to determine whether there is cause for concern about surgical practice or a surgical service, and/or individual episodes of care, and to make recommendations for improvement.
“Our unwavering commitment to patient care is why we offer healthcare organisations an invited review service.”
Advertisement
Mr Irwin who worked for the South Tyneside and Sunderland NHS Trust between 2001 and 2023, retired in 2022, but a selection of his patients have been contacted directly by Spire over potential issues with his work.
Mr Irwin relinquished his role with the General Medical Council (GMC) in May 2025, which now means that no GMC investigation into his work is now possible.
Spire Healthcare suspended Mr Irwin in August 2023 and withdrew his practising privileges in September 2024.
The private practice started recalling patients who were operated on by Mr Irwin during his time at Spire Washington Hospital in the summer of 2025.
Advertisement
The Care Quality Commission (CQC) confirmed that it inspected Spire Washington Hospital in October last year after concerns were raised with it, and would be publishing its findings in due course.
Sunderland Royal Hospital (Image: Stuart Boulton)
Law firm Slater and Gordon has reported significant numbers of patients coming forward with concerns over the surgery they had with Mr Irwin.
John Lowther, specialist clinical negligence solicitor at Slater and Gordon in the North East, is leading the firm’s investigations into the work of Mr Irwin at both Sunderland Royal Hospital and Spire Washington Hospital.
“We have been investigating cases against Leslie Irwin for some time, but have seen very significant numbers of new people coming forward since Spire announced its investigation.
Advertisement
“We know from patients who were with Mr Irwin at Sunderland Royal Hospital, how upsetting and frustrating they found the initial stance of the NHS Trust,” he says.
South Tyneside and Sunderlans NHS Trust (Image: STUART BOULTON)
“It was very concerning how one place where Mr Irwin worked was concerned enough to investigate him, ban him from practicing and contact former patients proactively to highlight issues in their care, while the other took no action at all.
“We, of course, welcome the overdue announcement that the Trust has sought the support of a specialist from the Royal College of Surgeons, and hope this can help answer some of the many questions that exist around the practice of Mr Irwin over the course of many years.
“We will continue to work tirelessly on behalf of our clients in pursuit of this.”
Advertisement
Spire Washington says they have been in touch with patients and are reviewing specific procedures undertaken by Mr Irwin.
A Spire Healthcare spokesperson: “We sincerely apologise to those patients who did not receive an appropriate standard of care from Mr Leslie Irwin, a consultant orthopaedic surgeon who has not practised at Spire Washington Hospital since 2023.
“We are currently reviewing specific procedures that were provided to a select cohort of patients of Mr Irwin and are in direct contact with these patients to offer support at what we recognise is a concerning time.
“The review is being run in accordance with NHS England’s National Quality Board: Recall Framework, which Spire Healthcare helped to develop.
Advertisement
“If any Spire Washington patients have questions about the care provided by Mr Irwin, they can call 0191 720 3031 or email spirepne@spirehealthcare.com and a member of the dedicated review team will call them back.”
Mr Irwin has not responded to requests for comment by The Northern Echo.
Newcastle, meanwhile, have fallen well off the pace in the race for a European berth, arguably due to the demands of their Champions League campaign and resultant injuries.
Their middling form will give Carrick some confidence, too. The Magpies come into this tie having lost five of their last six league matches, most recently tasting defeat at home to Everton. They also failed to beat relegation favourites Wolves in late January.
They are facing a brutal run of fixtures, too, with Manchester City in the FA Cup, Barcelona in the Champions League, and a league visit to Chelsea all on the horizon, before the month ends with the small matter of a Tyne and Wear derby.
Date, kick-off time and venue
Advertisement
Newcastle vs Manchester United is scheduled for an 8.15pm GMT kick-off on Wednesday, March 4, 2026.
The match will take place at St. James’ Park in Newcastle Upon Tyne.
Where to watch Newcastle vs Manchester United
TV channel: In the UK, the game will be televised live on TNT Sports 1, with coverage starting at 7pm GMT ahead of an 8.15pm kick-off.
Advertisement
Live stream: TNT Sports subscribers can also catch the contest live online via the Discovery+ app and website.
Live blog: You can follow all the action on matchday via Standard Sport’s live blog!
Newcastle vs Manchester United team news
United’s injury list has grown considerably in recent weeks, with three defenders picking up new issues.
Advertisement
Luke Shaw was withdrawn early in the Crystal Palace match following a tough tackle from Daniel Munoz, before Harry Maguire came off late on.
Speaking at full-time, Carrick said neither was at 100 per cent: “They just weren’t feeling too well. Hopefully they will be feeling better soon.”
It remains to be seen whether the pair will be involved on Tyneside, as Carrick speaking at his pre-match press conference, was unable to offer a concrete update on either’s condition.
“We’re working towards [them being fit],” he explained. “We’ve still got a bit of time to the game so we’ll see how they feel.”
Advertisement
Injury worry: Luke Shaw
Getty Images
Lisandro Martinez and Mason Mount are both pushing to return from injuries for this match, though it may come too soon for the pair.
Matthijs de Ligt and Patrick Dorgu will both remain in Manchester as they recover from a lower back issue and a torn hamstring, respectively.
Advertisement
Newcastle, meanwhile, have seen their season derailed by injuries in recent weeks.
Bruno Guimaraes, Tino Livramento and Fabian Schar are all closing in on comebacks from their respective injuries, but none are expected to be available midweek.
Sidelined: Bruno Guimaraes
Action Images via Reuters
Lewis Miley remains sidelined with a niggling thigh injury, but is hoping to make a comeback by the end of the month.
Advertisement
Jacob Ramsey was brought off early at the weekend due to illness, but he is expected to be fit for the visit of United.
Emil Krafth is out for the season with a knee injury.
Newcastle vs Manchester United prediction
As Newcastle prepare for this match, Eddie Howe may well be preoccupied with the following fixtures: an FA Cup fifth-round tie with Manchester City and a Champions League last-16 clash with Barcelona.
Advertisement
For United, who are out of both domestic cups and not involved in European competition, full focus is on the trip to Tyneside.
Should Howe opt to rest key players with an eye to keeping them fresh for next week’s Cup exploits, the door would swing wide open for Carrick’s side to take advantage and grab all three points.
Manchester United to win, 2-1.
Head to head (h2h) history and results
Advertisement
Five of the last seven meetings between these two sides have been won by Newcastle, though Man United, then under the premiership of Ruben Amorim, won the reverse of this fixture 1-0 on Boxing Day thanks to a goal from Patrick Dorgu.
Manchester United wins: 91
Patrick Dorgu scored the winner in the reverse of this fixture
The NHS published guidance for families with young children on its official website
Amber O’Connor and Georgia Burns Trainee Trends, Showbiz and Lifestyle Writer
23:16, 03 Mar 2026
According to the latest guidance on the NHS website, parents are being advised to follow a specific ‘rule’ at certain times of the day. The health service’s website offers advice on sunscreen and sun safety for people across the UK, including recommendations for families starting from March.
The advice comes as spring begins, with the Met Office noting that meteorological spring starts on March 1, while astronomical spring begins around March 20 in the UK, bringing longer days and warmer temperatures.
As a result, NHS guidance to “spend time in the shade when the sun is strongest” comes into effect. The NHS states: “In the UK, this is between 11am and 3pm from March to October. Make sure you spend time in the shade between 11am and 3pm.”
Advertisement
Parents are also urged to “take extra care with children”. Highlighting the importance of sun protection for the young, the NHS provides specific advice for families with babies and children, the Mirror reports.
Get more Daily Record exclusives by signing up for free to Google’s preferred sources. Click HERE.
What does the NHS say about sun protection for children?
The official NHS website states: “Take extra care to protect babies and children. Their skin is much more sensitive than adult skin, and damage caused by repeated exposure to sunlight could lead to skin cancer developing in later life. Children aged under six months should be kept out of direct strong sunlight.”
The advice continues: “From March to October in the UK, children should:
Advertisement
cover up with suitable clothing
spend time in the shade, particularly from 11am to 3pm
wear at least SPF30 sunscreen
“Apply sunscreen to areas not protected by clothing, such as the face, ears, feet and backs of hands.” The NHS also advises that if children go swimming, parents should use water-resistant sunscreen and reapply it immediately after they leave the water, since swimming can wash it off.
Ways parents can protect children’s skin
Cancer Research UK says parents can support the sun safety of children and teenagers in a number of ways. The charity’s website explains: “Sun safety is important at all ages. The best way to protect adult or children’s skin is to use a combination of shade, clothing and sunscreen.
“Remember, sunscreen doesn’t give complete protection from the sun. It always needs to be used together with shade, clothing, a hat and UV protection sunglasses. Apply sunscreen regularly and generously, using a minimum of SPF 30 and a 4 or 5 star rating.”
The guidance continues: “Sunscreen should not be used on babies under 6 months old, so think about shade and covering them up with clothing. The NHS recommends that babies under 6 months should be kept out of direct sunlight.
Advertisement
“Children and teenagers might need a reminder or a helping hand when it comes to sun safety. But setting a good example yourself is a great way to help them learn how to be safe in the sun.”
Israel and the US carried out joint strikes on several key Iranian sites on Saturday, February 28. During the strikes over the weekend, Iran’s supreme leader at the time, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, was killed. Iran has responded with strikes across the Middle East, causing widespread panic across the region.
Ensure our latest headlines always appear at the top of your Google Search by making us a Preferred Source. Click here to activate or add us as Preferred Source.
The Associated Press reported that all were assigned to the 103rd Sustainment Command in Des Moines, lowa.
Advertisement
Four of the six service members have been named as:
Capt. Cody A. Khork, 35, of Winter Haven, Florida
Sgt. 1st Class Noah L. Tietjens, 42, of Bellevue, Nebraska
Sgt. 1st Class Nicole M. Amor, 39, of White Bear Lake, Minnesota
Spc. Declan J. Coady, 20, of West Des Moines, lowa
Reuters news agency reported the following death tolls according to information by the involved countries as of March 3, but had not independently verified these deaths:
Iran: 787 people killed, according to the non-profit humanitarian group Iranian Red Crescent Society. It was unclear if the death toll included Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps military casualties
Israel: 10 civilians killed, according to Israel’s ambulance service Magen David Adom. The Israel Defense Forces has reported no military casualties
Lebanon: 50 people killed, according to Lebanon’s health ministry
Bahrain: One person killed, according to the interior ministry
Kuwait: Three people killed, according to Kuwait’s health and foreign ministries
Oman: One person killed, Reuters reported
United Arab Emirates: Three people killed, according to UAE’s defense ministry
US military: Six US service members, according to U.S. Central Command