Connect with us

News

23andMe directors resign as the CEO of the genetic-testing company seeks to take it private

Published

on

23andMe directors resign as the CEO of the genetic-testing company seeks to take it private

NEW YORK (AP) — All of 23andMe’s independent directors resigned from its board this week, a rare move that marks the latest challenge for the genetic-testing company.

The resignations follow drawn-out negotiations with 23andMe CEO and co-founder Anne Wojcicki, who wants to take the company private. In a Tuesday letter addressed to Wojcicki, the seven directors said they had yet to receive a “a fully financed, fully diligenced, actionable proposal that is in the best interests of the non-affiliated shareholders” from the chief executive after months of efforts.

The directors said they would be resigning effective immediately — arguing that, while they still believed in 23andMe’s mission, their departures were for the best due to Wojcicki’s concentrated voting power and a “clear” difference of opinion on the company’s future.

Wojcicki later responded to the resignations in a memo to employees, published in a securities filing, saying she was “surprised and disappointed” by the directors’ decision. Still, she maintained that taking 23andMe private and “outside of the short term pressures of the public markets” would be best for the company long term.

Advertisement

Wojcicki added that 23andMe would immediately be identifying independent directors to join the board. Wojcicki, who holds 49% of the voting power at 23andMe, was the only remaining board member listed on the company’s website as of Thursday. A spokesperson had no further updates to share when reached by The Associated Press.

23andMe, which went public in 2021, has struggled to find a profitable business model since. The company reported a net loss of $667 million for its last fiscal year, more than double the loss of $312 million for the year prior.

Shares for 23andMe have also plummeted — with the company’s stock closing at 33 cents Thursday, down more than 97% since its 2021 stock market debut, according to FactSet.

Wojcicki announced her intention to take 23andMe private, by way of acquiring all outstanding shares that she doesn’t own, in April. Wojcicki also said that she wished to maintain control of the company and was not willing to support alternative transactions from other bidders. She submitted a proposal in late July, but the board’s evaluating committee found it to be wanting.

Advertisement

Beyond the resignations, 23andMe has made other a handful of other headlines in recent months — particularly around privacy concerns. Last week, 23andMe agreed to pay $30 million in cash to settle a class-action lawsuit accusing the company of failing to protect customers whose personal information was exposed in a 2023 data breach.

23andMe has shared preliminary support of the settlement, which is set to be heard by a judge for approval next month. In a statement, a spokesperson said that the company looked forward to finalizing the agreement, which it believe is “in the best interest of 23andMe customers.” The $30 million payment would settle all U.S. claims, the spokesperson added, and $25 million of it is expected to be covered by insurance coverage.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

News

Mail SEO chief on how to fight big tech

Published

on

Mail SEO chief on how to fight big tech

Publishers have been urged to “band together” to challenge big tech’s power over news industry revenues as an executive revealed the impact of recent Google updates at Mail Online.

Speaking at Press Gazette’s Future of Media Technology Conference last week, a group of industry experts warned there is a mismatch between how the news industry and tech platforms calculate value that means publishers are powerless addressing them alone.

Carly Steven, the global head of search engine optimisation (SEO) at Mail Online, said a June anti-spam update rolled out by Google had hit affiliate revenue from, for example, publisher voucher code and betting offers, which she said “effectively turned off a very significant revenue stream for a lot of publishers”.

“All of that content – that was really valuable, and we genuinely believe our readers find it very valuable too – it was just gone overnight.”

She said it spoke to a broader trend wherein publishers have less control in an increasingly unpredictable online landscape.

Advertisement


“We used to have a lot of control, as SEO editors or people working in this industry… We used to be able to tweak a headline, add some links and get something back. It used to be so easy… All that control is gone. I could not do that anymore. 

Content from our partners
Advertisement

“If an editor says to me: ‘I want this story to rank at the start of the top stories rail’ – I cannot make that happen in the way that we used to do.”

Googe deployment of AI Overviews varies wildly from week to week

Referring to AI Overviews, the artificial intelligence-generated summaries Google has begun deploying at the top of some search results, Steven said “the challenge that we’re facing… is that it does keep changing.

“We’ve taken part in studies where we’ve analysed our own keywords and seen that AI Overviews have been present for 23% of all the keywords that drive traffic to our website. And then the next week that’s 5%. 

“So it’s very hard to be able to make decisions right now based on the data that we have.”

Advertisement

AI Overviews concern some publishers because they are displayed above links in Google’s search results, pushing publishers further down the page and potentially answering user enquiries without sharing any traffic.

But Steven said for now their impact on traffic was unclear, asking: “Do people ever click if you have a link within an AI overview? Probably not, but right now, we just don’t know…

“What’s taking up my time at the moment, in terms of trying to understand the AI landscape, is developing the tools to enable us to track it on an ongoing basis.”

SEO consultant Barry Adams said from what he’d seen AI Overviews “don’t really present a threat, yet, to publishers – at least not in the context of news, where AI Overviews are mostly absent from news topics”. He said they are presented more often for “evergreen” information.

Advertisement

Last month research by consultancy Authoritas that found AI Overviews were being offered for 17% of queries in the UK and US on the top keywords. Earlier, Press Gazette-commissioned research by Authoritas published in June saw AI Overviews offered for 24% of the top keywords driving publisher traffic.

Adams said overviews did not “seem to be cannibalising as much traffic as maybe some had expected – it tends to be low single-digit percentage traffic losses, which basically makes AI Overviews just another search feature like you had before… So it’ll be just another thing to optimise for. Which means more work for everybody, yay.”

Mismatch between how publishers and platforms assess value

Denis Haman, the chief executive of Glide Publishing Platform, described the relationship between publishers and platforms as “abusive” and questioned whether big tech could ever meaningfully value news.

“We’re not friends, we’re not even frenemies,” he said. “That’s the reality… it doesn’t matter whether you’re exposing corruption or whether you’re telling life stories, the media plays a role in society which has a greater value than what some random number cruncher at Meta will assign to it.”

Advertisement

Madhav Chinnappa, a senior executive consultant at AI data marketplace Human Native and previously the director of news ecosystem development at Google, said: “The reality is that the tech companies, from their California headquarters, look at the industries that they touch and they value them based on the revenue that they bring in.”

In the news industry’s case, he said “it’s de minimis, right?

“I actually was on a panel with an ex-Facebook person who talked about it, and he said: ‘Look, actually, the value of news to Facebook is zero if not negative, because when they took news off, their revenues went up.’

“So they’re valuing it based on dollars in. But I think the news industry and news people value the news industry on societal value…. I think that’s actually one of the fundamental factors about why this relationship has been so difficult.”

Advertisement

‘Green shoots’ resulted from collective industry attempts to cajole big tech

On a more optimistic note, Mail Online’s Steven said that “a really positive unintended consequence” of June’s Google spam SEO update for publishers was that “it’s forced us together a lot more”.

“While that was a terrible thing that happened… publishers all came together to put pressure on Google, to insist on having conversations with them.

“I’m not saying that we’ve got the solution that we wanted to, but it was really productive, and not just because it’s a bit of a therapy session.”

She said there had been “green shoots” from those discussions.

Advertisement

“I feel like, personally, our relationship with Google – while it can be frustrating because we don’t get answers – I feel like there’s been some small victories. 

“And maybe I need to be more ambitious with my targets, but on the back of some of the things that we collectively as publishers have raised, Google… clarified things, they tweak the rules.”

Steven said Google is “not really interested in you individually as a publisher”.

“But when you have a whole industry coming together and being able to provide evidence and proof that ‘you made this change, and something collectively happened to all of us, and the consequences of that are really bad for your users who are searching for this information on Google’ – then they pay a little bit more attention.”

Advertisement

SEO expert Adams said: “You need to hold them accountable, because if you just let them get away with it, they aren’t just going to care about us.”

He added: “It is not true that all of Google search results are purely algorithmic. There are some specific aspects, like for example, around Covid information, where Google will manually whitelist websites…

“We need to lift that veil off of it and understand these are just human-coded algorithms – coded by people who make editorial decisions on what works and what doesn’t work, and it is okay to hold them to account.”

Chinnappa agreed that publishers needed to work together to influence big tech, saying tech companies are “culturally different” from the news industry and that the way to sway them was “at scale, with data”.

Advertisement

‘Don’t get split up by bits of money here and there’

On the question of whether publishers should licence their content to artificial intelligence companies, Chinnappa noted that away from giants like Google and OpenAI, “there’s actually an entire AI developer ecosystem of small and not so small developers who also need access to content, and they want it for specific reasons, whether it’s niche content or it’s hard to find in a big data set, or, quite selfishly, they don’t want to get sued into oblivion…

“I think we need to be helping get that ecosystem that’s sustainable for both sides. Because I hope that data licensing becomes a sustainable revenue stream for publishers going forward, but we need to push in that direction together.”

And Haman, similarly, said “there’s an opportunity nowadays, with a new crop of big tech companies emerging, where we should come together as an industry and see whether we can influence the governments, band together, don’t get split up by bits of money here and there. 

“Because it’s not just the big guys. News Corp will do a deal, Axel Springer will do a deal, of course they will – as they should, people should pay for the content. 

Advertisement

“But what about smaller publishers? Who’s going to compensate them for the content that’s been taken from them without permission?…

“I don’t think that they’re going to have a breakthrough and all of a sudden see the value that that media industry [adds to] society, and it’s something that needs to be protected.”

Email pged@pressgazette.co.uk to point out mistakes, provide story tips or send in a letter for publication on our “Letters Page” blog

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Business

UK government borrows more than expected in August

Published

on

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

UK government borrowing sharply overshot expectations in August in a blow to chancellor Rachel Reeves as she prepares for her first budget next month.

The public sector borrowed £13.7bn, the highest August shortfall since 2021, according to the Office for National Statistics.

Advertisement

That was £3.3bn higher than August last year, and £2.5bn higher than had been forecast by the Office for Budget Responsibility, the fiscal watchdog.

Government net debt was provisionally estimated at 100 per cent of gross domestic product at the end of August 2024, the ONS added.

This is a developing story

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Harris and Oprah hold a star-studded rally in Michigan

Published

on

Harris and Oprah hold a star-studded rally in Michigan

Vice-President Kamala Harris and television icon Oprah Winfrey held a star-studded event in Michigan, one of the seven crucial battleground states that will decide the US election on 5 November.

Winfrey, who also spoke at the Democratic National Convention in Chicago in August, asked Harris about what seemed like a sudden burst in confidence, a moment where “a veil or something dropped”, after she replaced President Joe Biden as nominee.

Hollywood stars including Meryl Streep, Jennifer Lopez, Julia Roberts, Chris Rock, and Ben Stiller joined a live discussion via video chat.

Harris is hoping the A-listers can help her sway undecided voters.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

News

More sex attack claims against ex-Harrods boss

Published

on

More sex attack claims against ex-Harrods boss
PA Media Mohamed Al FayedPA Media

A woman has told the BBC she was subjected to a “sickening” sexual assault by former Harrods owner Mohamed Al Fayed after being invited to his London flat for a work meeting.

The woman, who the BBC is calling Melanie, believes police were close to arresting him over her allegations just days before he died in August 2023.

A BBC investigation published on Thursday revealed that more than 20 women said they were sexually assaulted by the billionaire. Five said they were raped.

Melanie is one of a growing number of additional ex-Harrods employees to tell the BBC they were attacked since the documentary and podcast Al-Fayed: Predator at Harrods was released.

The BBC investigation gathered evidence that during Fayed’s ownership, Harrods not only failed to intervene, but helped cover up abuse allegations.

Advertisement

Melanie’s testimony comes as new details emerge of failed efforts by police and prosecutors to hold Fayed to account during his life, and a legal team representing many of the women the BBC has spoken to will set out their next steps on Friday.

Warning: this story contains details some may find distressing.

‘Sleazebag… slimy’

Melanie worked at Harrods for a few years prior to 2010. She described being hired there as a 21-year-old as a “dream job”.

Advertisement

She met Fayed – who was in his late seventies at the time – at work meetings on two occasions, before being summoned to his apartment on London’s Park Lane in late 2007.

Melanie says she went to the evening meeting despite the invitation “ringing the alarm bells”.

She was shown into the sitting room by a housekeeper.

Melanie continued: “He sat down next to me, talking to me for a few minutes, not very long… He had asked that I return a couple of weeks later to stay at the apartments the night before the Harrods sale, and I could go to the Harrods sale with him, and I could meet the celebrity that was opening it.

Advertisement

“And he would not really let me leave until I agreed to that, so I said yes to be able to leave. I did not go back.

“As I stood to leave, that’s when he put his hands on my breast and said some pretty disgusting things. And I was in complete shock. I just turned around and walked out.”

BBC iPlayer logo

Melanie told the BBC she did not share the full details of the “sickening” experience with loved ones, and for years “felt it was my fault” because she was “naive enough to have gone”. She described Fayed as a “sleazebag” and “slimy”.

In January 2023 Melanie decided to go to the police. The BBC has seen emails showing the case was passed to the Met’s CID department, which investigates serious allegations.

Melanie says she was later told the Met planned to arrest Fayed that year, and officers tried to arrest him on two occasions.

Advertisement

But he was too unwell to be questioned, and he died age 94 in August 2023.

PA Media HarrodsPA Media

Harrods, in London’s Knightsbridge district, has not been owned by Fayed since 2010

‘Rumours swirling’ on shop floor

Like other women the BBC has spoken to, Melanie said there were “rumours swirling” about Fayed, and described his private office as being like a “modelling agency” full of young women.

She continued: “There was definitely a knowledge, like a secret knowledge, within the company that Fayed likes to have pretty girls in his chairman’s office. And you do wonder what that means.”

Advertisement

Other women who worked at Harrods have painted a picture of Fayed as a predator who abused his position to prey on staff, and used his power to deter them from speaking out.

Some former employees recounted how he would tour his department store and identify young female assistants he found attractive, before promoting them to work his private office.

Ex-staff told the BBC this abuse was an open secret at the store. One said: “We all watched each other walk through that door thinking, ‘you poor girl, it’s you today’ and feeling utterly powerless to stop it.”

As well as inside Harrods itself and his Mayfair home, women have described incidents involving Fayed on trips to Paris, St Tropez and Abu Dhabi.

Advertisement

One woman described him as a “monster” who “cultivated fear” among his staff, while the store’s ex-deputy director of security revealed Fayed had phones tapped and secret cameras installed to monitor his employees’ discussions.

Suspected – but never charged

Melanie was not the only woman who tried to bring Fayed to justice.

The Metropolitan Police confirmed it was “aware of various allegations of sexual offences made over a number of years” against Fayed.

Advertisement

It said each of the allegations reported to the force had been “investigated and, where appropriate, advice from the Crown Prosecution Service was sought”.

But Fayed was never charged with a crime.

The closest he came to being uncovered appears to have been in October 2008, when he was questioned over allegations made by a girl who he first met when she was 14.

Ellie – not her real name – told the BBC that Fayed personally offered to secure her a job despite her still being a teenager, and she started working at Harrods when she had just turned 15.

Advertisement

She recounted how in May 2008 she was told to go to the Harrods boardroom, where she said she was attacked by Fayed.

“He started…hugging me and [getting] touchy feely, and rubbing himself against me, and then he just grabbed my face and tried to… put his tongue in my mouth.

“I mentioned that I was 15, and [said] ‘what are you doing?’, and he said I was turning into a beautiful woman and grabbed my chest.”

She said Fayed flew into a rage and started screaming at her when she pushed him off.

Advertisement

Ellie went to the police and Fayed was questioned by detectives – news which became public in October 2008.

Reuters Mohamed Al FayedReuters

On Thursday, the Met confirmed it had spoken to more than one witness and analysed telephone data in Ellie’s case. The force said it handed a file of evidence to the CPS – but prosecutors decided no further action should be taken.

The Met has declined to say whether Ellie’s case was the only one where Fayed was formally questioned, though the BBC has seen no evidence he was ever quizzed over any other allegation.

The BBC understands Ellie’s case was the only time when a file of evidence was handed to the CPS, a step which has to be taken before an individual can be charged.

On four occasions, police investigations into Fayed were advanced enough for police to consult prosecutors for legal advice.

Advertisement

The CPS advised the Met in 2018, 2021, and 2023 – but in those instances, police did not provide prosecutors with a full file of evidence. It is also not clear if all of those investigations relate to separate women.

It means Fayed was never forced to answer claims against him in court during his lifetime.

Melanie described the feeling of discovering Fayed had died and would never be taken in for questioning over her 2023 report as “gutting”.

But asked what she would say to Fayed if he were still alive today, Melanie told the BBC: “That you didn’t get away with it. That everybody out there knows what you’ve done… and money can’t get you out of this.”

Advertisement

Hiding in plain sight

The claims against Fayed have not come out of the blue.

The Egypt-born businessman owned Harrods between 1985 and 2010 and became a well-known figure through other high-profile acquisitions, such as the Ritz hotel in Paris and Fulham Football Club.

He came to further public prominence when his son Dodi died alongside Diana, Princess of Wales – with whom Dodi was romantically involved – in a Paris car crash.

Advertisement

Despite chat show appearances and his associations with celebrities and public figures, suspicions about Fayed’s predatory behaviour were investigated during his life – including by Vanity Fair in 1995, ITV in 1997 and Channel 4 in 2017.

It was only when Fayed died that many of his victims felt able to come forward.

On Friday, details of new claims are expected to emerge.

PA Media Michael Jackson and Mohamed Al FayedPA Media

Through his business ventures, Fayed became a public figure with several celebrity associations, including singer Michael Jackson

Members of the UK legal team representing many of the women featured in the BBC documentary “Al-Fayed: Predator at Harrods” are to hold a news conference on Friday morning.

Advertisement

The legal team will outline the case against Harrods. They will be joined by the US women’s rights lawyer Gloria Allred, who has represented victims of high-profile offenders in the past.

Fourteen of the women the BBC has spoken to have brought civil claims against Harrods’ current owners for damages.

Harrods said it has a process available to women who say they were attacked by Fayed, adding “it has been our priority to settle claims in the quickest way possible, avoiding lengthy legal proceedings for the women involved”.

Harrods reiterated its apology to its former staff after the BBC investigation was published. A spokesperson said: “We have now had the opportunity to watch the programme and once again express our sympathy to the victims featured.”

Advertisement

The Met said it was committed to investigating sexual offences and encouraged victims to speak to police.

It also said any new information about Fayed would be “assessed and investigated accordingly”.

Fayed’s family did not provide a statement when asked for comment.

BBC Sounds logo

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Business

Taiwan says device parts not made on island

Published

on

Taiwan says device parts not made on island

The Taiwanese government has said components in thousands of pagers used by the armed group Hezbollah that exploded in Lebanon earlier this week were not made on the island.

The comments come after Taiwanese company Gold Apollo said it did not make the devices used in the attack.

The Lebanese government says 12 people, including two children, were killed and nearly 3,000 injured in the explosions on Tuesday.

The incident, along with another attack involving exploding walkie-talkies, was blamed on Israel and set off a geopolitical storm in the Middle East.

Advertisement

“The components for Hezbollah’s pagers were not produced by us,” Taiwan’s economy minister Kuo Jyh-huei told reporters on Friday.

He added that a judicial investigation is already underway.

“I want to unearth the truth, because Taiwan has never exported this particular pager model,” Taiwan foreign minister, Lin Chia-lung said.

Earlier this week, Gold Apollo boss Hsu Ching-Kuang denied his business had anything to do with the attacks.

Advertisement

He said he licensed his trade mark to a company in Hungary called BAC Consulting to use the Gold Apollo name on their own pagers.

The BBC’s attempts to contact BAC have so far been unsuccessful. Its CEO Cristiana Bársony-Arcidiacono told the US news outlet NBC that she knew nothing and denied her company made the pagers.

The Hungarian government has said BAC had “no manufacturing or operational site” in the country.

But a New York Times report said that BAC was a shell company that acted as a front for Israel, citing Israeli intelligence officers.

Advertisement

In another round of blasts on Wednesday, exploding walkie-talkies killed 20 people and injured at least 450, Lebanon’s health ministry said.

Japanese handheld radio manufacturer Icom has distanced itself from the walkie-talkies that bear its logo, saying it discontinued production of the devices a decade ago.

Iran-backed Hezbollah has blamed Israel for what it called “this criminal aggression” and vowed that it would get “just retribution”.

The Israeli military has declined to comment.

Advertisement

The two sides have been engaged in cross-border warfare since the Gaza conflict erupted last October.

The difficulty in identifying the makers of the devices has highlighted how complicated the global electronics supply chain has become.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

PSNI policy protects criminals, says victim

Published

on

PSNI policy protects criminals, says victim
BBC Liz and Catherine McSherry sitting on a sofa - Liz has short red hair - wearing a black top and cream blazer. Catherine has brown hair in a ponytail with a fringe - wearing a black top. BBC

Liz and Catherine McSherry said the PSNI changing its policy is a welcome step

The victim of a man convicted of voyeurism has said criminals are being protected by the Police Service of Northern Ireland (PSNI) not releasing mugshots.

Catherine McSherry welcomed the force’s plans to change its policy on custody images and said it was a “positive step”.

Unlike many police forces in the UK, the PSNI does not routinely issue mugshots of serious offenders after sentencing.

Chief Constable Jon Boutcher has said the PSNI will begin releasing the images “in line with the custom and practice elsewhere”.

Advertisement

The PSNI said the “logistics of how we do that are now being worked through”.

Catherine’s step-brother Christopher was found guilty of six charges of voyeurism and one of unauthorised computer access.

The 35-year-old, from Portadown in County Armagh, was sentenced to 100 hours of community service, 18 months’ probation and a sex offences prevention order.

The judge said it was one of the worst cases of voyeurism seen by the court.

Advertisement

Catherine said victims felt “ignored and not taken seriously” when no mugshot was issued.

“I think it can be very validating for victims to have an actual mugshot taken of their perpetrator rather than just smiling photographs of them in their day-to-day life,” she said.

“I think it stops people being desensitised to the fact that this was a crime that was committed.”

Her sister, Liz, described the lack of custody photos as “a further failure” towards victims.

Advertisement

“Why are the PSNI protecting the criminal more than the victim? The whole system feels to me set up to protect perpetrators and not victims,” she said.

In April, the PSNI announced it was reviewing its policy.

It came after families whose loved ones were killed by drunk drivers questioned why police would not release photos of the offenders.

Internal emails seen by BBC News NI showed confusion among PSNI staff over the policy.

Advertisement
PA Media PSNI chief constable Jon Boutcher wearing police uniform - he has white short hair and is looking into the camera as he is speaking at a presser. PA Media

Mr Boutcher said logistics to facilitate publishing mugshots were being looked at

Mr Boutcher was asked for an update on the review at a recent Policing Board meeting.

He he said he had reviewed the policy.

“I have reviewed it. In short, we will be publishing photographs of people convicted of certain serious crimes where there is a policing purpose to do that,” Mr Boutcher said.

Catherine said the change was “definitely positive” and “a long time coming”.

Advertisement

“I think I speak for many other victims when I say that it would help massively, not just sexual abuse cases – any kind of criminal activity,” she added.

Former senior PSNI officer Jon Burrows also welcomed the move as a “positive, albeit long overdue step”.

He said he hoped the change would bring the PSNI “into line with UK-wide practice”.

“It is vital that justice is seen to be done and releasing the mugshots of those convicted of certain crimes will improve confidence in the justice system, encourage victims to come forward and send a clear message to perpetrators that actions have consequences,” he said.

Advertisement

“Given the epidemic of violence against women and girls, it is really important that those convicted of such crimes are included in the release of post conviction photographs.”

In a statement a PSNI spokeswoman said that the police “will be publishing photographs of people convicted of certain serious crimes where there is a policing purpose to do that”.

She emphasised logistics were being worked through but there was “no definite timeline for this at present”.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2017 Zox News Theme. Theme by MVP Themes, powered by WordPress.