Although there are generally fewer insects during the colder months, it’s not uncommon for the occasional beetle or moth to wander inside. For most, this is hardly an issue, as these tiny intruders can be easily caught and set free outdoors.

However, if a spider makes its way into the living room, it can cause quite a stir—especially for those with arachnophobia.

Despite being incredibly helpful creatures, many people are still frightened by them. But killing them isn’t the answer!

Fortunately, there’s a simple, natural trick to keep them out—and it involves something you can easily collect during your next autumn walk: chestnuts!

Stay informed with free updates

Simply sign up to the UK employment myFT Digest — delivered directly to your inbox.

In one of the most interesting UK equal pay cases, a few weeks ago the retailer Next was found to have discriminated unfairly against women working in its stores. The tribunal did not conclude that Next had engaged in direct discrimination (it paid men and women in the same roles identically) but warehouse employees received higher basic pay than retail staff. Retail staff were traditionally mainly women, while warehouse staff were traditionally men. Earlier cases had found the jobs to be of equal value.

The finding of indirect discrimination has raised the hackles of some economists. The UK law was “strikingly Marxist”, said Professor Alex Tabarrok at George Mason University. He and others objected to the assessments that underpin the equal value finding at a time when market forces and online retail have raised warehouse pay relative to retail pay.

In truth, the judgment was more nuanced and the case holds lessons both for economics and law.

Many of the mocking assessments from economists relate to the legal legwork of assessing the value of different jobs — taken too literally, the detail seems absurd. But discrimination happens when the market provides unfair outcomes, so you do need some process to evaluate the respective value of roles.

Economists should lighten up a little. Such assessments have been around since the 1970 Equal Pay Act, which came into force in 1975. Given their longevity, claims they undermine the performance of the UK economy do not pass muster.

But there are difficult questions for the application of the law. And here economics can help. One of the retail store claimants was offered work at a Next warehouse for more pay but turned it down, describing the offer as a ruse by the employer. Economists call this “revealed preference”: a powerful indication that the jobs were not the same. But the tribunal “did not regard [this] fact . . . as of any real significance”. At the very least, it must suggest the equal value assessment might have flaws.

To an economics brain, another highly relevant fact was that over the relevant period, 47 per cent of Next’s warehouse staff were women. This damages the case that warehouse work is predominantly male so pay differences are discriminatory, even indirectly. The law should allow the relevance of these material facts and cross-check the granular detail of assessments.

There are many similar cases trundling through the courts, with supermarkets predominantly in the line of fire. These will also test the “material factor defence”: the need for employers to demonstrate a reason apart from discrimination that different jobs attract different pay. The Next case will be highly relevant.

What has not gained much publicity is that the tribunal found in favour of Next as often as against. Most significant was that the main method for the retailer to bolster pay in its warehouses (and keep it at market rates) was via performance bonuses. This, the judge found, was a material factor in pursuit of the company’s legitimate aims of enhancing business performance and improving productivity. Higher pay for warehouse workers was allowed when labelled appropriately.

In addition, if Next found the outcome too onerous, it could divest its retail or warehouse functions and purchase these as services from another company. Equal pay law requires the claimant and her comparator to have the same employer. A recent court of appeal case allowed The Royal Parks to pay its employees the London living wage while paying contractors less.

It’s important not to jump to conclusions and understand the nuances of equal pay cases. The big picture outcome was reasonable if expensive. It demonstrated that although equal pay law bucks the market, and by design, there are limits and legal ways for companies to differentiate but not discriminate.

chris.giles@ft.com

A CELEBRITY chef’s seafront restaurant is set to close today after three years of business.

Michael Caines has shocked fans after announcing he is selling not just one but two of his popular restaurants.

2

2

Advertisement

Mickeys Beach Bar and Restaurant in Exmouth opened in April 2021 but tonight after dinner, it will close for good.

It offered all-day coffee, drinks, afternoon tea, and casual dining with glorious views of Torquay to Berry Head and the English Channel.

The restaurant was one of the first businesses in Sideshore and loved by many.

Customers on Google Reviews described it as having “a lovely atmosphere”, with “great views”, “seamless” service and “delicious” food.

Now, after three and a half years, it has been sold to someone else.

And not only this, Cafe Patisserie Glacerie, owned by Michael Caines and Sylvian Peltier will close too.

It is believed both restaurants have been sold to another local business, DevonLive reports.

Both venues will close in preparation for the site being sold.

In a statement Michael said: “On behalf of all the team we would like to thank our customers and suppliers for your support, we have thoroughly enjoyed serving each and every one of you and making Mickeys and the Café a special place to meet by the sea.

“I would also like to thank my team for their unwavering support and dedication, despite the challenging times we have had, I am proud of what we have been able to create.

“We are however delighted to announce the sale of the business to another local business operator who shares a similar passion, for fun relaxed dining.”

The Michael Caines Collection of restaurants said it will make another announcement once the sale is completed.

Customers have been redirected to Pool House Restaurant at Lympstone Manor hotel “for casual and relaxed dining”.

Disappointed locals took to Facebook to share their disappointment.

One person said: “Shame. Only decent place on the beach front.”

While a second wrote:  “Good job we grabbed a drink when we did.”

A third person said: “A sad reflection of Exmouth, falling further into poverty.”

And a fourth commented: “Well! We didn’t see that coming!…”

Wimbledon has been warned that its historic decision to ditch line judges could put the UK’s entire tennis ecosystem at risk.

The All England Club (AELTC) confirmed on Wednesday that line judges, part of the furniture on court for the tournament’s entire history, will become a thing of a past next year, when HawkEye’s live line-calling system will be used on every court – bringing the grass-court slam in line with the Australian and US Opens as well as the main tour.

But sources outside the AELTC fear the huge reduction of umpires in use at the Championships will damage the grass roots of the game in Britain, where officiating is a predominantly voluntary endeavour undertaken as preparation for work at a higher level.

“There will definitely be a lot of people that drop out because you’re not in Wimbledon any more,” one line judge tells i.

Read Next

Australian authorities seeking to reduce the number of people on court during the Covid-affected 2021 season introduced HawkEye Live at the Australian Open.

At the time, the AELTC said they were monitoring that development “with interest”, but insisted that line judges were “highly skilled individuals” who played a “key role in the fabric of the sport”.

The success of the Australian innovation caused the HawkEye Live to become almost ubiquitous in the professional game and long-time line judge and umpire Nathan Watt quit, suspecting it would not be long before he too was replaced by the system.

“I could see this coming. That really was the end for me,” he tells i – ending the 32-year-old’s long association with Wimbledon, having been a ball boy, then a ball kid trainer and later a line judge in multiple singles finals.

“So generally, you start your career as a line umpire, and people progress. You do both [line judging and chair umpiring] in parallel for a while.

“A lot of people obviously progress through the ranks on line, but choose not to with their chair – but will do chair umpiring at small tournaments.

“That will probably be a big unintended consequence: lots of local clubs and small clubs have line umpires, like eight or 10 of them, for club finals. How much line umpires will carry on wanting to do the small tournaments, if they can’t then do Wimbledon at the end, remains to be seen.”

Other sources still working within the game echoed those sentiments but were unwilling to speak on the record with the competition for jobs at Wimbledon now particularly acute.

The AELTC insists that “we are working to ensure that opportunities exist for as many officials as possible to remain involved with the Championships”.

That is expected to involve the appointment of “match assistants” or “court assistants”, as is already the case at the two hard-court grand slams and tour events where there are no line judges.

The assistants deal with tasks such as ball changes, net measuring between sets and managing players’ off-court breaks, but there will only be one per match – as opposed to the nine-person teams who previously worked one hour on, one hour off Centre Court. Assistants are also required to be qualified line judges in case HawkEye Live goes down.

“Having reviewed the results of the testing undertaken at the Championships this year, we consider the technology to be sufficiently robust and the time is right to take this important step in seeking maximum accuracy in our officiating,” said AELTC chief Sally Bolton.

“For the players, it will offer them the same conditions they have played under at a number of other events on tour.

Read Next

“We take our responsibility to balance tradition and innovation at Wimbledon very seriously. Line umpires have played a central role in our officiating set-up at the Championships for many decades and we recognise their valuable contribution and thank them for their commitment and service.”

The Lawn Tennis Association (LTA) – the sport’s governing body, who also provide line judges for the Championships – is scrambling to ensure the job cuts at the top do not result in the feared contraction of the ecosystem, although no one can deny this is a risk and it’s clear this was a decision taken by the club, not by those involved in tennis more widely.

“We understand the reasons behind the AELTC’s decision to introduce live electronic line-calling and we recognise the ongoing changes to officiating around the world,” an LTA spokesperson said.

“With this in mind we are already working with the Association of British Tennis Officials (ABTO) to understand the impact on the pathway for British officials, and develop a new joint strategy with them that will ensure officials can be retained within the sport, new officials can be recruited and the officiating community will be supported through the changes.”

ABTO represents more than 800 licensed officials across the United Kingdom, who are understood to have been polled this year on possibility of the removal of line judges at Wimbledon. It is believed that nearly half indicated they would considering stepping down if working at SW19 was no longer a possibility.

HawkEye Live will also be used at Queen’s and Eastbourne next summer, but the rest of the grass-court season will still rely on line judges at events such as Birmingham, Nottingham and Ilkley. But with the men’s professional tour having already mandated that all of its events must use a form of electronic line-calling from next year, it is possible that the women’s game could follow suit, further reducing the incentive for volunteers to work at grass roots events.

At lower-level professional events such as the third-tier Futures Tour, line judge fees are usually just £60 a day. Without the carrot of advancement, authorities face an uphill battle to keep people involved in the sport.

Argentina’s president Javier Milei has said he is not ready to lift the country’s currency controls, arguing that a fixed date for scrapping the measure is incompatible with his “regime of freedom”.

In an interview with the Financial Times, the libertarian economist argued that, for the controls to be scrapped, the country’s rampant inflation had to fall further, among other economic conditions.

“We are not communists, we are libertarians,” Milei told the FT. “There is a philosophical question behind this, which is that I cannot set dates because I don’t think like a central planner. We think in terms of a regime of freedom.”

The controls, imposed by a previous government in 2019 amid an economic crisis, fix the peso at an official rate and limit individual and company purchases of foreign currency, creating a black market for the US currency and deterring foreign investment.

Milei, who devalued the official rate by more than 50 per cent on taking office in December last year, had previously said he hoped to scrap the controls in mid-2024.

The Argentine president has vowed to turn the heavily regulated South American nation into one of the world’s freest economies as part of a radical plan of shock therapy to slash spending and shrink government.

He has balanced the budget, ending years of deficits funded by central bank money printing, and brought down monthly inflation from a peak of 26 per cent last December to 4.2 per cent in August. However, prices have still risen by 237 per cent over the past 12 months.

The price of black market dollars has fallen since July, narrowing the gap with the official peso rate of 980 and leading some economists to suggest the government should seize the moment to scrap the currency controls altogether.

The official rate is devalued by 2 per cent a month, a depreciation that has been outpaced by the rise in consumer prices this year. This has led exporters to complain that almost all of the competitiveness gains from December’s 54 per cent devaluation have now been wiped out.

The country’s economy has contracted for three consecutive quarters.

But, when asked if it was the right time to remove the controls, Milei said, in the joint interview with his economy minister Luis Caputo at the Casa Rosada presidential palace in Buenos Aires: “No, not yet.”

Caputo also questioned the urgency of scrapping the restrictions, saying that while he did not want “to underestimate people looking at currency controls . . . it almost seems childish to focus on whether [they] end in two months, three, five or eight. That doesn’t matter”.

When he travelled abroad with the president, Caputo added, “we always see investors in the real economy and honestly, nobody asks about currency controls”. 

Milei argued the previous government had created an excess of pesos — which he described as a “money overhang” — by printing money and not allowing Argentines to buy dollars freely.

He said the controls could “be lifted when the ‘money overhang’ has ended”, and added that three conditions needed to be met “simultaneously” to do so.

One condition was a fall in monthly inflation to less than 2.5 per cent, compared with August’s 4.2 per cent.

The other conditions would involve domestic banks selling their extensive holding of short-term Argentine government bonds to fund increased lending to companies and provisioning for the pent-up demand for dollars that has built up under the controls.

Milei expressed frustration with investors who demanded to know when the controls would be scrapped, arguing that meeting the conditions largely depended on private sector behaviour.

He added that scrapping the capital controls was not dependent on a deal with the IMF, which Argentina owes $43bn. “We have already begun lifting some of the regulations that make up the controls. And we’re doing all of that by ourselves,” he said.

“If someone comes and gives us a lot of cash, well then yes, we’ll open [the controls] tomorrow. But we are working as if that isn’t going to happen . . . it’s as if we were extremely risk-averse.”

But Caputo added that the government was still considering whether to start negotiations with the IMF on a replacement loan package, which would include fresh cash “to increase net reserves” that would “help to lift the [exchange] controls”.

The economy minister denied the currency was overvalued. “We can’t expect the real exchange rate to be as low as it was during Argentina’s worst economic crisis in history,” he said.

“We believe we must gain competitiveness not by devaluing [again], which is what Argentina has always done,” he added. “The solution is growing, achieving a [fiscal] surplus and lowering taxes.”

Caputo argued that the economy was improving as Milei’s policies took hold and the effects of the “disastrous” monetary policy of the previous Peronist administration had faded. He said the Peronists had printed pesos equivalent to 13 per cent of GDP in their final year in office to fund government spending.

“So this hurry, this anxiety [to lift currency controls] is a mistake and we are not going to make that mistake,” Caputo said. “The most important thing for Argentina is to lift controls when this doesn’t cause stress for our people.”

The Labour government “seems to be doing its best to scare people” into making bad decisions, according to Strategic Wealth Partners managing director and chartered financial planner Amyr Rocha Lima.

Speaking at Money Marketing Interactive in London yesterday (8 October), he told advisers to expect more phone calls ahead of the Budget.

“Even our most well behaved and responsible clients will reach out to us,” Lima said.

However, “if your clients do not reach out to you in the run-up to the Budget, you should reach out to them,” he added.

Triple Point retail strategy director Diana French, speaking on the same panel as Lima, said the backdrop for this Budget includes tax at its highest level since 1949.

“The tax environment is hard at the moment and is likely to get harder,” she said. “I do really feel like tax is a big conversation right now.”

Lima said regardless of what is announced in the Budget, it is “important we treat people as human beings.”

During the panel discussion, French also spoke positively about venture capital trusts (VCTs).

VCTs are investment vehicles that were set up to promote investment in small UK businesses that meet certain criteria.

To encourage support for these businesses, the government offer generous tax benefits..

In September 2023, French told Money Marketing that VCTs “are becoming a part of regular [financial] advice”.

French added that VCTs give investors access to companies that can grow very quickly.

Triple Point is a purpose-led investment management house that supports financial advisers, but does not actually provide advice to investors itself.

Industry duo Lima and Ian Cooke launched Strategic Wealth Partners, a financial planning practice targeted at high-net-worth clients across the UK.