Connect with us

Business

Chancellor Rachel Reeves says she needs to raise £20bn. How might she do it?

Published

on

Chancellor Rachel Reeves says she needs to raise £20bn. How might she do it?
BBC Montage image showing a hand putting two £20 notes into a collecting tin with the words £20bn above an image of Chancellor Rachel Reeves' faceBBC

We’re just a few weeks from the government’s crucial first Budget on 30 October and it’s clear Chancellor Rachel Reeves intends to raise money.

There is a black hole in public finances, she says – based on her apparent discovery since arriving at No 11 Downing Street in July of an unbudgeted £22bn overspend in the current tax year.

Now, whether that really is a newly discovered black hole is a matter of dispute. Either way, given Ms Reeves has ruled out borrowing to fund day-to-day spending, she is still likely to need to raise taxes to pay for that spending.

So if you were in her position, how might you go about raising it? Let’s not pretend this is too precise a game – we’ll call the figure £20bn for simplicity’s sake.

This figure is somewhat arbitrary. In truth, the overspend this year is of little relevance when it comes to how much extra tax you need next year or in five years’ time. And one imagines the Budget will mostly find tax rises that bite in 2025-26 and beyond.

Advertisement

In any event, when the Budget comes, we will have an updated economics forecast, new projections for how government revenues and spending are looking, possibly a new fiscal target as well. So a lot will change by 30 October.

iPlayer banner
BBC Sounds banner

Nonetheless, if you were a chancellor with the task of finding £20bn in front of you, then you would probably like the option of being able to increase the rates of one of the big four taxes: income tax, VAT, National Insurance and corporation tax. Together, they represent two-thirds of the total cash that the government receives.

However, for better or worse, the chancellor ruled out such tax rises in the election campaign, and she has made it quite clear that she is not going to abandon her pledges. So for our purposes, such tax rises are clearly verboten.

That is a significant constraint. Remember that in its last year, the Conservative government cut taxes by £20bn by slashing the rate of National Insurance. One way of raising money would simply be to reverse that cut and take us back to where we were before last November.

So by ruling out a Tory National Insurance cut reversal, the chancellor has made our game of finding £20bn far more… taxing.

Advertisement

But once you’ve put all those tax rises to one side, there are still more potential routes to raising extra revenue that we can look at.

One is through capital gains tax, charged on profits made from the sale of an asset that has increased in value, such as second homes or shares not held in individual savings accounts (ISAs).

But when it comes to capital gains tax “I don’t think immediately it will raise a vast amount of money”, says Judith Freedman, emeritus professor of tax law and policy at the University of Oxford. “It might bring in a few billion, it’s not going to give you £20bn.”

Another route is through inheritance tax. But this “only kicks in when you are quite wealthy”, says Dan Neidle, founder of the think tank Tax Policy Associates.

Advertisement

Between them, capital gains tax and inheritance tax raise less than £25bn a year at the moment, so to get an extra £5bn would still require a sizable jump in those taxes.

However, there are also ways you could raise cash through higher National Insurance or income tax, without actually changing their headline rates.

When it comes to National Insurance and income tax, far bigger amounts are at stake if the chancellor is minded to look at the rules governing the tax treatment of pension contributions.

At the moment, for most people, if you put any earnings into a pension, you don’t pay income tax on those earnings. And if employers contribute to a pension on your behalf, they don’t pay employers’ National Insurance on that, as they would if they gave it to you as salary.

Advertisement

Between them, these perks cost the exchequer about £50bn a year. Most of that benefit goes to higher earners, who not only put more into their pension pots, but who often deduct income tax at a higher rate than the average worker.

It is an area ripe for reform. Indeed, the right-of-centre think tank, the Centre for Policy Studies, proposed a radical reform of the system 12 years ago. A left-of-centre chancellor will be keen on the potential revenue to be found here.

Getty Images Rachel Reeves addressing the Labour Party conferenceGetty Images

Chancellor Rachel Reeves will announce her Budget on 30 October

Now it has to be said, when it comes to squeezing more tax out of a population, there are two broad approaches a chancellor can take. We might call them the expedient and the economic.

The expedient is to search for places where you can raise money with a minimum of squealing. On this approach, there doesn’t have to be much logic to any tax rise – it’s just about finding the money in hidden corners.

Advertisement

The economic approach is slightly different. It starts with the idea that there are more and less logical ways to tax people, and that the tax system should avoid picking on certain types of activity in arbitrary ways.

In this world, you usually want to avoid taxing some income or savings more than other income or savings, because that would likely be unfair and it would distort people’s decisions.

On this account, you need to have a vision for how all the pieces of the tax system interact. “Fiscal neutrality” is a phrase that has sometimes been used to describe a system that is designed to tax in as level a way as possible.

And although our tax system is manifestly full of anomalies and illogicalities, when it comes to pensions specifically, economists often share a broad vision of what a fiscally neutral tax system should try to do.

Advertisement

The basic principle is that people should pay tax once – not twice – on pensions.

So you either give tax relief upfront, on the money people put into their pension savings, then you tax the pension income people enjoy when they get old. Or you give no upfront relief at all and tax the income going into a pension fund, but you charge no tax on the pension when it comes out.

Judged against these principles of neutrality, our current system is a bit of a mess.

Many people get 40% income tax relief on what goes into a pension and pay 20% on what comes out. That’s not logical.

Advertisement

Also, employers’ National Insurance isn’t charged at either end; and you can get a tax-free lump sum when you take a pension, even though you had tax relief on the money you contributed to that.

You don’t need to understand all these details to see that a chancellor who wants extra tax revenue can look at pension contributions and will see an orchard full of ripe fruit for picking.

And what makes it very compelling is that the orchard looks bountiful whether you’re gazing at it through the glasses of expediency or through the lens of economic logic.

Sir Edward Troup, a tax lawyer who has worked in the Treasury, expects the chancellor to take action in this area in the Budget.

Advertisement

“The question is how far, how fast does she go?” he says.

“Does she really try and get some money in the next few years – which will be painful – or does she introduce some reforms that have got slow burn and build up tax receipts from people who are retiring over the next five, 10, 20, 30 years?”

I also wonder whether the Budget will try to tidy up the illogicalities of the system, or simply be about raising as much as possible?

It’s possible, of course, that there could be important tax changes other than those I’ve talked about. More than one of PM’s listeners wrote in to suggest a new tax on land values (an idea popular with the Greens and sometimes the Liberal Democrats). It may be a step too far for this Budget, even if it’s one that many economists find appealing.

Advertisement

An important thing to note is that a £20bn tax rise will be significant for the exchequer, but it’s by no means enormous in historic terms. It’s equivalent to about £6 a week, for every man, woman and child in the country or £25 each week for a family of four.

Another way of looking at it is that would keep NHS England going for about 40 days a year. Or putting it another way, £20bn is less than 1% of our annual national income. And it’s about 1.7% of total government spending. It’s not revolutionary, but nor is it nothing.

And we’ll have to wait until 30 October to see exactly which approach Rachel Reeves takes.

BBC InDepth is the new home on the website and app for the best analysis and expertise from our top journalists. Under a distinctive new brand, we’ll bring you fresh perspectives that challenge assumptions, and deep reporting on the biggest issues to help you make sense of a complex world. And we’ll be showcasing thought-provoking content from across BBC Sounds and iPlayer too. We’re starting small but thinking big, and we want to know what you think – you can send us your feedback by clicking on the button below.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Business

Stellantis is skidding into unknown territory

Published

on

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

When stuck in traffic, it is best to avoid erratic stop-start driving. That is a lesson Stellantis is learning the hard way.

The European carmaker is suffering from the ills affecting the entire auto sector. Sluggish vehicle sales, competition from Chinese operators and the uncertain trajectory of the transition to electric vehicles have resulted in a slew of warnings, from the likes of Mercedes, BMW and Volkswagen. On top of that, Stellantis has managed to fall into a US pothole that is largely of its own making, which was behind this week’s massive profit warning.

Advertisement

Its problem is that, in the favourable post-Covid landscape — in which demand for vehicles outstripped supply — it pressed the accelerator much too hard. It raised prices and cut less profitable models, leading to record North American operating margins of more than 16 per cent in 2022, according to S&P Capital IQ, almost double General Motors’ in the same period.

Line chart of Share price, € showing Stellantis shares have crashed

That strategy crashed into a wall. Consumers cut its market share from 13 per cent to 8 per cent since Covid, according to Harald Hendrikse from Citigroup, resulting in a massive build-up in wholesaler inventories. Efforts to clear this, by cutting prices and lowering production, explain much of Stellantis’s profit warning. It will barely break even in North America, its biggest profit pool, in the second half of the year. Free cash flow, which was expected to be positive, will swing to a €5bn to €10bn loss.

That leaves Stellantis lacking any pitch to investors. Capital returns must now be under review. Worse still, it looks like the group’s sector-leading profitability — which briefly made it a market darling — was simply unsustainable. As many a consumer business has found, focusing on costs at the expense of sales is a recipe for fleeting success and lasting distress.

Stellantis’s road back will be long and winding. Rebuilding market share is a laborious process involving new models and brand investment. The alternative — cutting brands and capacity — is painful. Unsurprisingly, rumours about a merger with France’s Renault (which Stellantis denied in February) have resurfaced in the Italian press.

Investors may also be concerned about the size of the problem that the company managed to accumulate before it slammed on the brakes. Trust in the group’s highly regarded boss, Carlos Tavares, has been hit. With his contract expiring in 2026, Stellantis has begun its search for his successor.

Advertisement

With Stellantis, on about three times forward earnings, trading roughly in line with European rivals such as VW and Renault, it is not clear why anyone would climb aboard its recovery trip now.

camilla.palladino@ft.com

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Money

State pension warning as 340,000 face silent tax raid next year

Published

on

State pension warning as 340,000 face silent tax raid next year

TENS of thousands of retirees are set to pay tax on their state pension for the first time next year.

It is expected that around 340,000 pensioners will be told that they need to pay tax when the state pension rises by £460 in 2025.

340,000 pensioners will need to pay tax on their income for the first time

1

340,000 pensioners will need to pay tax on their income for the first time

Letters from the taxman will land on doorsteps for the first time next April, when the new tax year starts.

Advertisement

This is due to the triple lock, which means the payment made to those aged 66 and over rises every April by the highest out of inflation, the average UK wage increase or 2.5%.

Wages rose by 4% between May and July this year and experts suggest this figure will be the deciding factor in how much the state pension will rise by next year.

With tax thresholds frozen until 2028, this increase will drag around 340,000 pensioners into paying tax for the first time, it has been warned.

Read more on the state pension

This is because the total annual amount of income they receive will be more than their personal allowance.

Advertisement

The allowance is the amount of money you can earn before you have to pay tax on your income.

Under the current rules, this is up to £12,570 each tax year.

Over the next few weeks HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) is writing to 560,000 customers as part of its “simple assessment” process, which will calculate who needs to pay what tax.

It was previously expected that around 140,000 pensioners would receive a letter for the first time this year.

Advertisement

But because of the suspected increase in the state pension, 340,000 people are now likely to get one.

Can you get free cash to help with the cost of living?

Sir Steve Webb, the former pensions minister, told The Sun: “Whilst pensioners benefit from an above inflation increase in 2025, some of the increase will be clawed back through taxation for more and more pensioners.

“This comes on top of the loss of winter fuel payments for most. Taking account of rising energy bills on top of all these changes, by next April, not many pensioners will feel better off overall.”

Previously all pensioners received a Winter Fuel Payment of up to £300 each year to help cover the cost of energy bills.

Advertisement

But in July the government said that the payment, which is not taxable, would only be made to those on low incomes who claim certain benefits.

How does the state pension work?

AT the moment the current state pension is paid to both men and women from age 66 – but it’s due to rise to 67 by 2028 and 68 by 2046.

The state pension is a recurring payment from the government most Brits start getting when they reach State Pension age.

Advertisement

But not everyone gets the same amount, and you are awarded depending on your National Insurance record.

For most pensioners, it forms only part of their retirement income, as they could have other pots from a workplace pension, earning and savings. 

The new state pension is based on people’s National Insurance records.

Workers must have 35 qualifying years of National Insurance to get the maximum amount of the new state pension.

Advertisement

You earn National Insurance qualifying years through work, or by getting credits, for instance when you are looking after children and claiming child benefit.

If you have gaps, you can top up your record by paying in voluntary National Insurance contributions. 

To get the old, full basic state pension, you will need 30 years of contributions or credits. 

You will need at least 10 years on your NI record to get any state pension. 

Advertisement

These include Pension Credit, Universal Credit, income-related Employment and Support Allowance, income-based Jobseeker’s Allowance, Income Support, Child Tax Credit and Working Tax Credit.

To be eligible you needed to be receiving a benefit during the qualifying week of September 16-22.

Meanwhile, yesterday the energy price cap increased by 10%, adding £149 a year to the average household bill.

Between October 1 and December 31 the energy price cap is set at £1,717 for a typical household which has a dual fuel tariff and pays by direct debit.

Advertisement

The increase will pile further pressure onto pensioners who are struggling to make ends meet this winter.

How will the tax be paid?

HMRC has said that the letters it is sending to pensioners will include detailed calculations of any tax due on the income they receive in the 2023-24 tax year.

Pensioners will need to pay this tax through a Simple Assessment tax bill.

What is the Winter Fuel Payment?

Advertisement

Consumer reporter Sam Walker explains all you need to know about the payment.

The Winter Fuel Payment is an annual tax-free benefit designed to help cover the cost of heating through the colder months.

Most who are eligible receive the payment automatically.

Those who qualify are usually told via a letter sent in October or November each year.

If you do meet the criteria but don’t automatically get the Winter Fuel Payment, you will have to apply on the government’s website.

Advertisement

You’ll qualify for a Winter Fuel Payment this winter if:

  • you were born on or before September 23, 1958
  • you lived in the UK for at least one day during the week of September 16 to 22, 2024, known as the “qualifying week”
  • you receive Pension Credit, Universal Credit, ESA, JSA, Income Support, Child Tax Credit or Working Tax Credit

If you did not live in the UK during the qualifying week, you might still get the payment if both the following apply:

  • you live in Switzerland or a EEA country
  • you have a “genuine and sufficient” link with the UK social security system, such as having lived or worked in the UK and having a family in the UK

But there are exclusions – you can’t get the payment if you live in Cyprus, France, Gibraltar, Greece, Malta, Portugal or Spain.

This is because the average winter temperature is higher than the warmest region of the UK.

You will also not qualify if you:

  • are in hospital getting free treatment for more than a year
  • need permission to enter the UK and your granted leave states that you can not claim public funds
  • were in prison for the whole “qualifying week”
  • lived in a care home for the whole time between 26 June to 24 September 2023, and got Pension Credit, Income Support, income-based Jobseeker’s Allowance or income-related Employment and Support Allowance

Payments are usually made between November and December, with some made up until the end of January the following year.

This can be paid online, by bank transfer or by cheque.

Advertisement

If you get a letter after October 31, 2024 for the last tax year you must pay it within three months of the date you received it.

There is also an option to pay in instalments, so long as you pay the full amount by the deadline.

There is an online guide to the Simple Assessment for pensioners which provides more information for those who receive a demand.

Do you have a money problem that needs sorting? Get in touch by emailing money-sm@news.co.uk.

Advertisement

Plus, you can join our Sun Money Chats and Tips Facebook group to share your tips and stories

Source link

Continue Reading

Travel

Edinburgh Airport announces check-in hall revamp

Published

on

Edinburgh Airport announces check-in hall revamp

The £5.8 million project will include new self-service machines and digital wayfinding, as well as the reconfiguration of check-in desks to improve passenger flow

Continue reading Edinburgh Airport announces check-in hall revamp at Business Traveller.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Business

James Cleverly gains momentum after Tory leadership speeches

Published

on

James Cleverly has bolstered his chances in the Conservative leadership race after his plea to his party to be “more normal” received a warm welcome from delegates in Birmingham, as the four candidates made keynote speeches at the party conference. 

Robert Jenrick, who won more votes from MPs during early voting in the contest, saw his immigration-heavy pitch fail to hold the room, as each contender made back-to-back addresses on Wednesday.

“I was going to vote for Robert Jenrick but I’ve changed my mind,” said Jackie Rance, a Tory member from Berkshire. “James Cleverly was honest and statesmanlike.”

The race to succeed Rishi Sunak was thrown wide open by a four-day event that has seen Jenrick and Kemi Badenoch stoke controversy, while Cleverly put in a popular performance and Tom Tugendhat remained the outsider. 

Advertisement

Cleverly, who came joint third in the second round of voting in the contest, clinched the biggest standing ovation in the auditorium, marking a strong end to the gathering during which he moved into second place in the betting markets, overtaking Badenoch.

A former foreign secretary and home secretary who has also been party chair, Cleverly emphasised his experience and said it was not the time for an “apprentice” to lead the Tories.

He kicked off with an apology, telling the party faithful he was “sorry on behalf of the parliamentary party — who let you down” and warned: “We have to be better, much better.”

The task ahead for the Conservatives was selling the party “with a smile”, he said, arguing: “Let’s be enthusiastic, relatable, positive, optimistic.” He also urged the party to “be more normal”.

Advertisement

Invoking former US president Ronald Reagan, Cleverly said the Tories should follow his lead in cutting taxes, slashing regulation, boosting military spending and winning a landslide. He finished his speech with a riff on one of the Republican’s best-known lines, vowing it could be “morning once again” in Britain.

Jenrick, who has topped the ballot in both rounds of voting by MPs to date, focused heavily on migration in his speech. 

He vowed to quit the European Convention on Human Rights and replace it in UK law with a new British bill of rights if he came to power, as he vowed to “secure our border”. 

Unveiling a five-point plan, Jenrick said he would reject mass migration, focus on cheap and reliable energy, get Britain building again, cut the size of the state and build a more united country.

Advertisement

Doubts rose as to whether his early momentum had stalled, however, as observers suggested he failed to hold the room. 

Tory MP Jesse Norman launched a surprising attack on Jenrick’s performance, branding his speech “lazy, mendacious, simplistic tripe”. 

Badenoch, who had been the favourite going into the contest, won strong applause for a speech in which she said she would “always fight leftwing nonsense”, declared herself a “net zero sceptic” and spelt out how she had challenged views around transgender issues.

She styled herself as a hard-talking truth-teller and said she would deliver tough messages to her party. Her programme for government would start from “first principles” to unpick the legacy of Tony Blair and Gordon Brown, which she said persisted in the UK.

Advertisement

She said she would make Labour chancellor Rachel Reeves “wriggle” and Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer “sweat”, adding: “We are going to have some fun.”

As candidates seek to attract support of Tory MPs ahead of the next rounds of voting next week — when the field will be whittled down to two, with members voting in the run-off — her campaign also unveiled former cabinet minister Sir David Davis as a new senior MP supporter after her address.

Tugendhat, widely viewed as the outsider, pledged to restore “patriotism and purpose” to the Conservative party, as he said he would focus on delivery rather than ideology.

Focusing heavily on his military career, which he said had fostered his leadership skills, he vowed: “I will serve our country, I will lead with conviction, I will act decisively.” 

A centrist Tory who has tacked rightward in the race, he repeated his pledge to cap net inward legal migration at 100,000 a year and called for tax cuts, simpler planning rules and a reduction in excess regulation. He said his mission was to deliver “prosperity and happiness” to the public.

Cleverly was deemed by many Tory activists to be the big winner of this week’s conference, with a widespread view that Jenrick’s speech had been a disappointment and that he was losing ground.

David Turner from South Shropshire said: “I thought Cleverly did really well. Jenrick didn’t hold the room.” 

Advertisement

Cleverly “came out of the week as the strongest one,” agreed Oliver Bramley, 23. He said Cleverly had a good presence, looked prime ministerial and eschewed “culture war” rhetoric.

Source link

Continue Reading

Money

IPOs on AIM market fall to lowest level since financial crisis

Published

on

Ebi launches index-tracking impact range

The amount of initial public offerings (IPOs) on the Alternative Investment Market (AIM) has fallen to its lowest level since the global financial crisis.

There were just eight IPOs this year (to the end of September), according to research by national accountancy group UHY Hacker Young.

This is a decrease from 12 last year and the lowest number since the five recorded in 2007/08.

Only £88.6m was raised through AIM IPOs in 2023/24, compared to £8.83bn raised during the market’s peak year of 2006/07.

Advertisement

UHY Hacker Young said the steep drop in AIM IPOs “highlights a challenging environment for smaller companies looking to raise capital.”

Additionally, there is uncertainty surrounding the tax status of AIM shares.

Concerns have grown that the government might scrap the inheritance tax (IHT) exemption that exists on UK companies that are listed AIM shares.

This has made private investors more “cautious about investing in AIM shares” said UHY Hacker Young.

Advertisement

“Without the interest of private investors the share prices of AIM companies would fall due to lower demand and liquidity.”

Also without the IHT relief attached to investing in AIM shares the market could face greater competition from private equity, “with companies deciding to stay private rather than list on a stock market”.

The IHT exemption attached to AIM shares was introduced to encourage private companies to list on AIM and scale up instead of staying private.

UHY Hacker Young chairman Colin Wright said: “Speculation about the future of tax relief on AIM shares is very unhelpful for the market.

Advertisement

“Now that interest rates are finally falling that should help AIM.

“We hope the new government will make it clear that they are not planning to subject AIM shares to IHT.

“That would lift a big cloud from the UK’s biggest growth company stock market.

“More management teams at growth companies now look toward US markets as they can offer much higher valuations for companies.

Advertisement

“Private equity and venture capital investors can also outcompete AIM due to lower compliance and reporting burdens.

“For a lot of fast-growing companies, the IHT exemption of listing on AIM has been that advantage.”

The number of companies on AIM stood at 704 at the end of August 2024, down by 7% from 753 at the end of 2023 and 58% from its peak of 1,694 companies at the end of 2007.

In September 2024, UHY Hacker Young research also found that the amount of money raised on the AIM through secondary fundraising decreased by 33% from last year.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Ursula von der Leyen urges closer EU-UK co-operation at Brussels meeting with Keir Starmer

Published

on

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen and UK Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer have promised closer co-operation as they opened bilateral talks aiming to “reset” relations between London and Brussels. 

“I firmly believe that the British public wants to return to pragmatic, sensible leadership when it comes to dealing with our closest neighbours,” said Starmer on Wednesday, speaking at the meeting in Brussels. 

Advertisement

The pair said that alignment on global affairs would provide a strong foundation for a rebooted bilateral relationship between the UK and the 27-country bloc.

“Dear Keir, in these very uncertain times, like-minded partners like us must co-operate more closely,” noted von der Leyen. 

But officials on both sides have cautioned against expecting quick results after four years of tense relations since the UK left the EU

The commission and EU member states will insist on the UK’s strict policing of trade flows between Great Britain and Northern Ireland, as enshrined in the Windsor framework, along with the post-Brexit Trade and Cooperation Agreement.

Advertisement

“We have a set of solid agreements in place,” said von der Leyen. “We should explore the scope for more co-operation while we focus on the full and faithful implementation of the withdrawal agreement, the Windsor framework and the TCA.”

Several member states have also warned against “cherry picking” policies given London wants to stay outside the EU single market and customs union.

Starmer has indicated he wants to forge a security deal with Brussels, covering areas such as defence and energy co-operation.

He is also willing to follow some EU rules to ensure industries including chemicals, with global supply chains, can trade smoothly.

Advertisement

“My discussions in Brussels will focus on how we can boost economic growth, strengthen our security and tackle shared challenges like irregular migration and climate change — kick-starting the detailed work to deliver the reset,” he said before the meeting.

“We will stand firm on our red lines. There will be no return to freedom of movement or the customs union.”

He added they would “set a new path towards deepening our defence and security ties and scaling up defence production across the UK, Europe and beyond — because this will be at the foundation of our security and prosperity for years to come”.

Starmer will also meet Charles Michel, president of the European Council, who chairs EU summits, and the European parliament president Roberta Metsola.

Advertisement

Metsola would stress that the rights of 6mn EU citizens in the UK must be protected, an official said.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 WordupNews.com