Connect with us

Business

ECB challenges Serbian bank’s takeover bid over money laundering concerns

Published

on

Stay informed with free updates

The European Central Bank is challenging the takeover of Austria’s Addiko bank by the Serbian lender Alta Pay over concerns relating to potential money laundering.

Alta Pay is owned by one of Serbia’s most prominent entrepreneurs, Davor Macura, who has political connections to figures close to President Aleksandar Vučić.

Advertisement

The Serbian group became the largest shareholder in Addiko earlier this year, assembling its position through several separate corporate entities.

Addiko has its roots in the Balkan branch network of Austria’s Hypo Alpe Adria bank, which was rescued during the financial crisis at an eventual cost to Austrian taxpayers of €9bn.

The ECB suspended some of the voting rights attached to Alta Pay’s holdings in August, publicly citing technical rules around stake disclosure.

However, behind the intervention is also a months-long investigation by the ECB into Alta Pay, the Financial Times has been told by four people with direct knowledge of the probe.

Advertisement

The investigation has led to serious concerns in Frankfurt over the Serbian group’s internal checks and controls and the financial resources of Macura. One significant concern is that ECB officials do not believe Alta Pay has adequate policies or practices in place to ensure the legal origin of funds deposited with it.

The ECB’s unusual intervention in an otherwise small regional banking deal illustrates how rising geopolitical tensions have put the integrity of European financial institutions into focus and the region’s regulators on high alert.

Despite having some of its voting rights blocked, Alta Pay believed it still had a viable route to taking control of Addiko, executives at the bank said.

In response, the ECB has drafted a letter to send to Alta Pay outlining its concerns over anti-money laundering checks and other compliance issues needed to operate a Eurozone bank, and emphasising that it remains opposed to any takeover as a result, according to three people familiar with the matter.

Advertisement

A spokesperson for the ECB said the bank did not comment on individual regulatory cases. Alta Pay executives rejected that the bank was in any way involved in illegal activity or did not have adequate checks and balances in place.

Macura told the FT, in a written statement sent by a spokesperson, that he was not aware of an ECB investigation beyond the August decision to block voting rights in Addiko, and said the bank had strong measures in place to prevent money laundering.

He said “assumptions and concerns” about the bank’s operations were “unfounded, unverified and incorrect”.

“We [reject] any comments about the possibility of abuse of our market position.”

Advertisement

He added that Alta Pay had engaged with regulators extensively. Information on his financial position, the origin of the bank’s assets and its internal controls “have already been delivered to the [Austrian Financial Market Authority] and the ECB, through a detailed presentation and clarifications in the application process itself”.

Some executives at the Serbian group are concerned that the challenge to their takeover will benefit rivals. Addiko’s board is known to be hostile to a takeover from Alta Pay. Slovenia’s NLB and Serbia’s AIK are both known to be interested in making a bid for the Austrian lender.

Alta Pay, which has been steadily growing since 2008, is one of the largest payment processors in Serbia, they said, and it has established relationships with large western financial institutions including Intesa Sanpaolo, UniCredit and JPMorgan.

The suspension of voting rights was an “ongoing process”, Alta Pay board member Milan Vicentic said.

Advertisement

Alta Pay had, since April, sought to engage with regulators to “position ourselves as an acceptable partner [ready to abide by] very strict regulations . . . to pass the most conservative and demanding requests not only from the ECB but each separate regulator in the countries which Addiko does business in”, Vicentic added.

A spokesperson for Addiko declined to comment.

A spokesperson for the Serbian government said the administration had no links to Alta Pay nor any involvement in the group or the probe, but declined to provide answers to more detailed questions.

As the owner of Alta Pay Group for more than 15 years, Macura “naturally had the opportunity to meet other actors from business and political life in Serbia, but nothing more or less than any other businessman or competitor”, they said.

Vučić’s media adviser, Suzana Vasiljevic, said the president had “no contacts whatsoever with Mr Macura. He never met him either for private or for business reasons.” Vučić had never interfered in Alta’s business or its overture to Addiko, she added.

The National Bank of Serbia told the FT that in its regular reviews “no significant irregularities were found in the operations of [Alta] Bank . . . In the first half of 2024, Alta Pay Group informed the [NBS] of its intention to acquire up to a 30 per cent stake in Addiko Bank in order to expand its business.”

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Business

Evening Standard kept afloat with £44mn in loans from Lebedev and other investors

Published

on

Evening Standard kept afloat with £44mn in loans from Lebedev and other investors

Accounts show Russian-born peer also wrote to company promising to provide continued support

Source link

Continue Reading

Money

Helical provides positive development and lettings update

Published

on

Helical provides positive development and lettings update

Ahead of the group’s half-year figures on 26 November, the group revealed progress made on a number of new developments since 1 April.

The post Helical provides positive development and lettings update appeared first on Property Week.

Source link

Continue Reading

Travel

Marriott Bonvoy and Aeroplan introduce status match and two-way currency transfer

Published

on

Marriott Bonvoy and Aeroplan introduce status match and two-way currency transfer

Elite members of each programme will receive complimentary status in the other scheme, while Aeroplan elite members can now convert points to Marriott Bonvoy at a 1:1 ratio

Continue reading Marriott Bonvoy and Aeroplan introduce status match and two-way currency transfer at Business Traveller.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Business

UK bookmakers don’t want to (and probably won’t have to) pay more tax

Published

on

UK bookmakers don’t want to (and probably won’t have to) pay more tax

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

The gambling industry generates excitement by advertising long-odds possibilities rather than expected outcomes. For example:

Ministers are considering a tax raid of up to £3bn on the gambling sector as Rachel Reeves casts around for funds to shore up the public finances.

Treasury officials are understood to be weighing up proposals, put forward by two influential thinktanks and backed by one of the party’s top five individual donors, to double some of the taxes levied on online casinos and bookmakers.

Advertisement

Measures could be included in this month’s budget, Labour’s first in 14 years, as the chancellor tries to plug the £22bn “black hole” that she claimed to have found in the nation’s finances after taking office.

Sources familiar with the discussions said the Treasury had yet to make a decision but appeared receptive to tweaking the UK’s complex regime of betting and gaming duties to raise extra funds of between £900m and £3bn, despite opposition from industry lobbyists.

The Guardian story above is by Rob Davies, author of one excellent book and several hundred stories about UK gambling. It’s safe to assume his sources are very well-informed.

Nonetheless, perspectives seemed to shift between the Guardian’s report late on Friday and Monday’s London market open. Per today’s FT:

Advertisement

[O]ne government figure told the Financial Times that ministers are not planning such a tax raid on the gambling industry in the Budget on October 30.

That’s after gambling industry types mobilised over the weekend to voice their well-rehearsed arguments about how higher levies would kill HMRC’s golden goose, drive the industry underground and/or towards unregulated markets, displease The Palace, etc. There’s a Betting & Gaming Council press release from Friday that lists all the main talking points, which means we don’t have to.

Reactions from the sellside have been similarly feverish. Here’s Jefferies’ analyst James Wheatcroft:

The proposals apparently being considered would all but wipe out bookmaker profitability in the UK, per our estimates. The headlines highlight that changing tax (and regulation) is a legitimate concern when investing in gaming companies, but the extent of these proposals seems unrealistic.

And here’s Barclays’ Brandt Montour:

While the article appears credible, the proposed changes (a doubling of most tax rates within one of the proposals) seem egregious to us, and will likely raise realistic concerns over anti-competitive impacts (most small operators would likely close-down) as well as giving a substantial boost to the black market. 

The Guardian report refers to two think-tank papers. The Institute for Public Policy Research has suggested doubling the general betting duty levied on high-street bookmakers from 15 per cent to 30 per cent and raising online gaming duty to 50 per cent. The Social Market Foundation proposes a flat 42 per cent duty for online wagers, which are currently charged at 21 per ent for casino games and 15 per cent for sports betting.

Advertisement

Yikes, say JPMorgan analysts Estelle Weingrod and Karan Puri:

We view both these recommendations as excessive and detrimental to the overall regulated UK gaming market. Moves of such magnitude would not only lead to operators exiting the (unattractive) UK market, but would also lead to overall less favorable terms for the players as licensed operators will (i) offer less attractive pricing/odds and, and (ii) reduce their bonusing/promotions spend in order to preserve some level of profitability for their UK business. In return, this would drive players to the black market, which, to a large extent, defeats the purpose of having a regulated market in the first place, given inability to protect the players who choose to play with illegal offshore operators, especially at a time when the UK Gambling white paper was about to be finally implemented (expectations towards early ‘25). Also worth noting that generally, more stringent regulation typically offers the opportunity for scale operators to consolidate the industry further as small/sub-scale operators struggle to mitigate the adverse impact as effectively, eventually exiting the market.

Flutter, Entain and Evoke (formerly known as 888) are the bookmaker stocks most exposed to UK politics. Flutter takes 19 per cent of its revenue from the UK, nearly all of which is online. Entain’s 29 per cent UK by revenue, the small majority of which is from the Ladbrokes Coral estate. Evoke is 68 per cent UK by revenue, of which 39 per cent is online.

JPMorgan forecasts that for Flutter, doubling the remote gaming duty would knock 62 per cent off its UK online Ebitda. At a group level that cuts 2025 Ebitda by 18 per cent, it says.

Reduced advertising spend, worse odds for punters, shop closures and job losses might mitigate the effect, while the closure of small bookies should ultimately benefit the big ones. These mitigation measures can cut the annual Ebitda hit to 10 per cent for Flutter and 17 per cent for Entain, says Citi.

Advertisement

Morgan Stanley’s numbers are similar:

Most analysts don’t bother running detailed forecasts, however, because they don’t see the point. Here’s Goodbody analyst David Brohan:

While it is clear the focus will now be on tax increases for the sector in the upcoming budget, we expect any increases to be moderate in line with the economic importance of the industry. The last tax increase in the UK was in 2019 when the rate of Remote Gaming Duty increased from 15% to 21%, and the UK tax rates are at the lower end of International peers. Our base case assumption is that sports betting duty is likely to remain unchanged (given the emotive issue of horse racing funding, and the challenges associated with increasing this duty). Remote Gaming Duty appears to be an easier target, however we would expect a much more moderate level of increase (3-5%) is a realistic expectation. In terms of impact to operators within our coverage, we estimate every 1% increase in Remote Gaming Duty to impact Adjusted EBITDA by 0.6% for Flutter, 0.7% for Entain, 1.6% for Evoke and 2% for Rank. These estimates are on a pre-mitigation basis with operators having several levers to pull including reduced promo/marketing to mitigate some of the impact.

It’s familiar territory. All the same arguments about protecting jobs and horseracing were aired after bumf accompanying the 2023 autumn statement mentioned a consultation on remote gaming taxes. Efforts to restrict UK fixed-odds betting terminals rumbled on for years and involved many of the same appeals to the greater good. More recently, French gambling stocks dropped on a report of duty reforms similar to these latest UK proposals that appears to have been quietly forgotten.

Gambling regulation does change, but the power of the lobby all-but-guarantees that it won’t change quickly or unexpectedly. And it plays straight into the industry’s interests when every suggestion for reform can be framed from the off as an existential threat.

Further reading:
Shed no tears for bleating bookmakers (FT)

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Money

1 in 4 adults think they have ADHD

Published

on

What is the Average Credit Score in the UK

One in four adults think they have ADHD and social media is driving trend for self-diagnosis.

One in four adults think they have ‘hidden’ ADHD — with social media driving a wave of self-diagnosis, scientists have claimed.

According to academics, social media is fuelling a surge in self-diagnosis of ADHD, with one in four adults believing they have “hidden” ADHD.

Related: 5 Highly Successful People You Didn’t Know Had ADHD

Advertisement

However, hardly half (13%) have actually contacted a mediator, according to US-based specialists who conducted a recent study monitoring the trend.

Less than one in twenty persons in the UK, according to research, genuinely have the illness, which is defined by impulsivity, hyperactivity, and difficulties concentrating.
They said that these numbers sparked worries that there may be undetected health issues causing comparable symptoms.

Related: 10 Highly Successful People You Didn’t Know Were Neurodivergent

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Business

Intesa Sanpaolo apologises after ‘disloyal’ employee accessed Giorgia Meloni’s account

Published

on

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

Intesa Sanpaolo has issued a public apology after a “disloyal employee” of Italy’s largest bank conducted more than 6,000 illegal breaches of accounts including those of Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni and EU commissioner-designate Raffaele Fitto. 

The lender said on Sunday night that after its internal control system identified the individual, it had notified data protection authorities, dismissed the employee and filed a complaint as an injured party.

Advertisement

“We are deeply sorry for what has occurred and we apologise,” the bank said in the statement. “This must never happen again.”

The scandal has placed Intesa’s controls systems in the spotlight, with some rightwing lawmakers suggesting that foreign powers were seeking to destabilise the government. 

Meloni told Mediaset television at the weekend that she thought the rogue employee was passing the information to a third party.

“Who are they selling it to? This is the answer we are waiting for, presumably there are interests behind this,” the prime minister said.

Advertisement

Tommaso Foti, a senior member of Meloni’s Brothers of Italy ruling party, told Italian conservative daily La Verità that “this is not the doing of a random looky-loo . . . this is the largest scandal in the history of our republic”.

The former Intesa branch employee, who was sacked in August, is being investigated by prosecutors in the southern city of Bari, close to where he was based.

He illegally accessed the bank accounts of politicians, sports personalities, entrepreneurs, VIPs and private citizens between February 2022 and April this year, according to people with knowledge of the investigation. 

Other personalities targeted in the data breach include former prime ministers Mario Draghi, Enrico Letta and Matteo Renzi, defence minister Guido Crosetto, former Juventus chair Andrea Agnelli and members of the Berlusconi family. 

Advertisement

Intesa said in its statement that “there was no cyber security issue”.

People close to the lender said it would appoint Antonio De Vita, a retired general of the Carabinieri police force, to oversee its cyber security services.

Italian daily Domani revealed the scandal last week, reporting that police had seized the former employee’s laptop, tablet and mobile phone as investigators seek to understand whether the account breaches had been ordered by a third party.

The lender’s share price has not been affected by the news.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 WordupNews.com