Connect with us

Business

Here are the questions we should ask about pensions

Published

on

Banker all-nighters create productivity paradox

John Plender’s recent articles on workplace pensions are well timed (“De-risking: the investment pitfalls for pension savers”, Opinion, October 19; and “The lucrative pension fund transfer trend needs urgent scrutiny”, Opinion, September 17).

Building a pensions system that is both fit for the future and sustainable is one of the most formidable social, demographic and economic challenges that we face.

Rather than focusing on particular asset classes and adjudicating the actuarial debates of 20 years ago, there are better questions to ask and conclusions to draw.

With defined benefit (DB) pensions, the ship has sailed. These schemes are now closed, and it is not possible demographically for the younger generations to subsidise the older ones in the way that they did decades ago.

Advertisement

UK companies have poured hundreds of billions of pounds into their DB schemes to prop them up and can no longer afford to offer them. The priority has to be to run them off in the safest, most secure way for their pensioners with minimal risk or, in the case of insurance, no risk, to sponsoring companies.

Re-risking them, as Plender suggests, risks repeating the mistakes of the past.

Looking forward, the better question to ask is how can we strengthen the defined contribution (DC) system, which is what most working people receive these days. Our goal has to be that this system provides the current generation of workers with healthy, adequate pensions in the future in the same way that DB arrangements did in the past.

The challenge here is straightforward. People need to save more, but the pensions industry and government also have important roles to play.

Advertisement

For most people, DC pensions are their savings with the longest time horizons. As a country, we have persistently underinvested in infrastructure and other strategically important investments for decades. The key to building a DC pensions system that is not only successful but also sustainable will be to encourage long-term pension savings into these kinds of long-term, productive investments.

John Towner
London N10, UK

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Travel

Hyatt and Grupo Piñero to join forces in new venture

Published

on

Hyatt and Grupo Piñero to join forces in new venture

Affiliates of Hyatt and Grupo Piñero should soon be entering into a long-term joint venture to manage Bahia Principe-branded hotels and resorts and own the Bahia Principe brand on a 50/50 basis that will expand Hyatt’s all-inclusive room portfolio by approximately 30 per cent

Continue reading Hyatt and Grupo Piñero to join forces in new venture at Business Traveller.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Business

Chinese exports soar as Beijing prepares for renewed trade tensions under Trump

Published

on

Chinese exports soar as Beijing prepares for renewed trade tensions under Trump

China could respond to aggressive new tariffs with bigger stimulus action or currency depreciation, say analysts

Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Farmers’ tax break merely pushed up UK land prices

Published

on

Banker all-nighters create productivity paradox

Far from “protecting the family farm”, as claimed by Tom Bradshaw, president of the National Farmers’ Union (Opinion, FT.com, November 5), the inheritance tax loophole on farmland, introduced in 1984, simply pushed up the price of land without improving returns to active farmers.

This is because, like most agricultural subsidies, the value of the relief was capitalised into land values. As tax planners cottoned on to its role as a licence to avoid IHT, they advised their super-rich clients to buy land and take advantage of it. In the 20 years to 2012, the price of farmland increased fourfold.

This turned landowning farmers into millionaires but — especially since land represents a cost of production — did no good to the incomes of food producers. It created impoverished millionaires who claimed a need for more support. At the same time, because more expensive land had to be squeezed even harder for the last drop of revenue, the environmental damage caused by intensive agriculture was made worse. Taking at least some of this tax loophole away will do no harm to family farmers but will help both public revenues and the environment.

Just a shame the relief was not wholly abolished.

Advertisement

Paul Cheshire
Emeritus Professor of Economic Geography
London School of Economics, London N7, UK

Source link

Continue Reading

Travel

Ananda in the Himalayas unveils luxurious new suites

Published

on

Ananda in the Himalayas unveils luxurious new suites

These luxurious accommodations join the renovated Ananda and Viceregal Suites, showcasing the retreat’s commitment to understated elegance.

Continue reading Ananda in the Himalayas unveils luxurious new suites at Business Traveller.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Business

A simple-to-implement plan to cut the trade deficit

Published

on

Banker all-nighters create productivity paradox

Robert Lighthizer suggests that to reduce the trade deficit the US could impose a system of import-export certificates (Opinion, FT.com, Nov 1), legislate for a capital access fee on inbound investment, and use broad-based tariffs to offset the unfair industrial policies of rival states.

But this would ultimately harm US workers and threaten global financial stability and growth. Foreign countries would undoubtedly retaliate, and the cost of capital in the US would rise. He conveniently ignores a simple-to-implement measure which, by the logic of national income accounting, would help to reduce the trade deficit: an increase in federal taxes.

George Hoguet
Chief Executive, Chesham Investments, Brookline, MA, US
Former Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for International Affairs

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Business

Let’s admit it, Gen Z is facing unique challenges

Published

on

Banker all-nighters create productivity paradox

I was relieved to read the article by Amy Borrett entitled “Hard times mean Gen Z finds life tougher than previous generations” (Report, November 5). It highlighted some very real challenges faced by this cohort that is now entering the workforce. And to be honest, more often than not, I am left feeling frustrated on their behalf at the negative narratives that can surround them.

From my own experience working with multiple generations, I have observed Gen Z coming into the workplace carrying genuine concerns about the pressures to reach certain financial milestones and the world around them. It weighs heavy on them.

Our own data has told us that among 18- to 24-year-olds, seven in 10 are worried about how long it will take them to earn a salary that enables them to get on the property ladder. Six in 10 are worried that they will be behind their parents in reaching those milestones.

But we also found a generation that is driven to succeed and accelerate their careers because of this. And I see examples of this every day.

Advertisement

Being a millennial myself, I of course suffered from several preconceptions about what I would be like to work with and what I would bring to a workplace. It happens with every generation.

But when we look at the world around us right now, perhaps we should be acknowledging there is a lot that is unique about what Gen Z is experiencing and tackling that we did not face.

Bee Patel
Director of Marketing, AlphaSights
London EC4, UK

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 WordupNews.com