Connect with us

Business

Should we let friends share our nanny?

Published

on

Friends who live nearby and whose children attend the same school as ours have asked if we would consider a nanny share, as both of them have to be back in the office. We’re happy to share. Our children all get along well and our nanny, who will earn more caring for four children, has said she’s happy with the new arrangement. But how does this work in practice with pay, holiday and so on? We already have her payroll and pension set up as she’s worked with us for more than a year.

Kirsty Wild
Kirsty Wild, a nanny employment and payroll expert from Nannytax.co.uk

Kirsty Wild, a nanny employment and payroll expert from payroll services provider Nannytax.co.uk, says nanny shares are increasingly popular as parents look for ways to lower the cost of childcare while getting the kind of flexibility and at-home childcare that childminders and nurseries can’t provide. One nanny looks after the children of two families at the same time, sometimes at one family’s house or alternating between their homes, so there are social benefits for the kids, too.

Under this new arrangement, your nanny will now have two employers. You must pay her separately and at least the national minimum wage each. Nanny shares are typically a win-win arrangement for everyone involved. Typically, parents pay less per hour than they would for an exclusive nanny, while nannies can increase their earnings. 

In the UK, nannies earn, on average, £15.51 per hour (gross), according to the latest Nannytax nanny salary index. That figure rises to £16.93 per hour in Greater London and the Home Counties and to £17.78 per hour in London. The minimum wage at the time of writing is £11.44 per hour for those over the age of 21. So, a nanny who cares for the children of two families will be paid at least £22.88 an hour before tax, while families can cut their childcare costs to minimum wage of £11.44.

Both of you will need employers’ liability insurance as well as separate employment contracts with the nanny and I suggest you take the time now to update your existing contract. This will be helpful if one family chooses to exit the arrangement before the other. The contract could specify a fair notice period of around four to six weeks to allow you to find another family to join the nanny share, and what the salary change would be if the nanny were to work with you exclusively again.

Advertisement

The contract should also make clear how your nanny’s annual leave is to be agreed. A fair way to work this out might be for each family to decide on one week and the nanny to decide when she takes the remainder of her leave.

As for the question of payroll, some families want to split the nanny’s tax code, which is entirely at her discretion. This makes it fairer as it prevents just one of you paying basic rate tax on all of the nanny’s earnings. However, if both families are paying a gross salary this won’t be necessary, so I would suggest you both decide on a gross rate of pay with the nanny, which also makes life easier for you when budgeting. If you use a nanny payroll provider they’ll sort all the PAYE admin for you.

Don’t forget that if you’re eligible, and your nanny is Ofsted-registered, you can both pay her through the tax-free childcare scheme.

Should I abandon my plans to move to Italy?

I have been a UK resident non-dom for 10 years and, in anticipation of the new tax rules, I am in the process of buying a house in Italy to retire to, but I understand there have been some tax changes there which may affect my plans. Should I reconsider my decision and stay in the UK?

Advertisement
Alice Pearson
Alice Pearson, a partner at accountants Mercer & Hole © Mark Sims

Alice Pearson, a partner at accountants Mercer & Hole, says that in a surprise move announced on August 7, the Italian government announced that anyone transferring their residence to Italy after August 10 2024 would pay a higher annual flat rate of tax, which has doubled from €100,000 to €200,000

This is an optional flat rate tax available to new Italian residents for the first 15 years of residence, as an alternative to paying tax on foreign-sourced income and certain capital gains.

If you were hoping to access this special tax regime when you retire to Italy, you will potentially face the increased annual charge. With this in mind, you will need to decide whether Italy continues to offer you a more favourable tax regime compared with the UK. 

UK tax rules for non-doms are also changing from April 6 2025 and you may find yourself exposed to UK tax on your worldwide income and gains for the first time. However, whether or not you will be better off under the Italian tax system depends on the scale of your income and gains, even more so now that the annual flat rate has doubled.

The main concern for many UK non-doms is around exposure to inheritance tax (IHT). It has been proposed that individuals who have been UK-resident for at least 10 years will be subject to IHT on their worldwide estate and will remain exposed for 10 years after giving up their UK residence. This again makes Italy’s flat tax system very appealing, as it exempts foreign assets from IHT.

Advertisement

However, even if you were to move to Italy in the current tax year, it is still uncertain whether you will escape the 10-year rule. It is also not yet clear how this continued UK IHT exposure would interact with the UK/Italy estate double tax treaty.

You also need to consider what it is you need to do to break UK residence and whether that is possible with your lifestyle.

Our next question

I own a second home in Cornwall that I bought 25 years ago. I am aware there are likely to be changes in the October Budget that could significantly raise tax liabilities arising from the house. Before this happens, I plan to transfer half of the property to my adult son who already spends a few weeks there each year and to whom I was planning to leave the house. I would however like to continue to spend a few weeks there each year myself — will this cause any issues with HM Revenue & Customs? Does he also need to pay for the ongoing maintenance of the house for it to be valid?

The sudden change to the Italian flat tax is a stark reminder that the tax rules in any country could change at any time and you don’t want to jump from the frying pan and into the fire — particularly before the new UK tax rules have been confirmed.

Advertisement

It is important to focus on the reason behind your decision to make the move. After a full discussion regarding their wealth, their objectives for the family and their future, many are choosing to stay in the UK and manage their exposure. You too might find you don’t need to leave the UK at all to achieve the objectives and retirement you want.

With the speed of these changes to the Italian tax rules, it is important for those who are considering a move to take advice relating to their individual wealth and circumstances, especially as the Italian parliament could make further changes to the law which are still in provisional form. 

The opinions in this column are intended for general information purposes only and should not be used as a substitute for professional advice. The Financial Times Ltd and the authors are not responsible for any direct or indirect result arising from any reliance placed on replies, including any loss, and exclude liability to the full extent.

Do you have a financial dilemma that you’d like FT Money’s team of professional experts to look into? Email your problem in confidence to money@ft.com.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Money

Martin Lewis’ MSE reveals five best Amazon Prime Day deals including Ninja kitchen gadget – and GHD ‘bargain’ to avoid

Published

on

Handy tool every Amazon shopper should use that reveals if a Prime Day deal is REALLY worth buying

MARTIN Lewis’ MoneySavingExpert has revealed the best deals on Amazon Prime Day – and the ones unlikely worth your time.

Amazon massive deal day is running for a second day and offers reductions on thousands of items.

The annual Amazon Prime Big Deal Day is today, October 9

1

The annual Amazon Prime Big Deal Day is today, October 9

In his popular weekly newsletter from MoneySavingExpert, Mr Lewis highlighted his top five deals.

Advertisement

At the top of the list is the Shark Corded Upright Vacuum Cleaner, which is tailored for pet hair pick up and has anti-odour technology.

The item is selling today for £189.99 and was previously £264.93 on Amazon Prime – meaning a £74.94 save.

The recommended retail price for the item is also £299.99, meaning a whopping £110 save compared buying directly from the Shark online store.

The next item on the list is the Ninja Speedi 10-in-1 air fryer – a multipurpose item which can air fry, grill, steam, bake, slow-cook, and more.

Advertisement

The product was originally £219.99, but is now selling for £129.99, meaning a £89.01 save.

Argos is currently selling the air fryer for £169, meaning at least a 20% saving compared to buying elsewhere.

Not only this, but due to the multipurpose design of the product, buyers could potentially be saving cash on additional products such as a slow cooker, which are selling on ProCook for £49 alone.

Martin Lewis explains how to slash your energy bills

Next up on the best deals list is the Apple Pencil (USB-C), which is selling for £64 instead of £79 – almost a 20% reduction.

Advertisement

Mr Lewis’ MSE team said: “This is the cheapest we’ve seen, and it’s the same price as on the July Prime Day.”

They said the next cheapest elsewhere is John Lewis, Argos and Currys where the pen can be bought for £79 – making today’s deal the best around.

Another impressive deal on the MoneySavingExpert list is the Fitbit Versa 4 which was £164 and is now £126.65.

The smart watch is made for keeping up to track with your physical well being, with a built in GPS, heart-rate monitor, and up to 6 days of battery life.

Advertisement

The same Versa 4 model is selling on Argos for £179, and the Google Store for £179.99, meaning at least a 30% save.

MSE said: “This is is the cheapest ever at Amazon. The previous cheapest price was £69.”

The final item on the list is the Ring Intercom, which can send you alerts via your phone or Alexa when a person visits your home.

You can also use it to unlock your home with voice demands.

Advertisement

It was originally selling for £99.99, but can now be bought for almost 60% less at £39.99.

Mr Lewis said the next cheapest offer can be purchased from ScrewFix, at £44.99.

Are Amazon deals all they’re cracked up to be?

However, his newsletter also warned that some deals aren’t as impressive as they seem, with some having sold cheaper in last year’s Prime Deal Day event.

For example, the Amazon Prime GHD original hair straightener seems like a good deal as is cheaper than elsewhere, selling today for £95.99 compared to £111.20 at John Lewis.

Advertisement

However, last July’s Prime Day it was reduced down to £90.24, making it £5.75 more expensive than it has been previously.

The same goes for the Blink outdoor cameras three-pack, a home surveillance kit, which is selling for £85.99 but was £11 cheaper last year.

The Ring Alarm pack, which comes with the Ring Alarm as well as an additional keypad and motion detection software, has generally stayed the same price at £179, and was £20.01 cheaper in May at £159.99.

While the £18.95 Calvin Klein For Him 150ml Eau de Toilette, which has been reduced from £24, was actually the same price in September.

Advertisement

It is, however, currently the cheapest around, with the next cheapest price being £24 from Lookfantastic.

And finally the Logitech High Performance Wired Gaming Mouse was £24.48 last August is now selling for £26.59 as a Brand Day Deal – making it £2.11 more expensive than it was previously.

This is again the cheapest around, however, with the second lowest option being £27.99 at Currys.

Overall, the MoneySavingExpert analysis shows that while a Prime membership can pay off, a deal isn’t always as impressive as it seems.

Advertisement

MSE also noted the disadvantages for non-Prime members, saying: “We’ve noticed numerous cases of Amazon being very cheeky, by raising the price higher than the RRP [recommended retail price] for those who aren’t Prime members.

“When you click on the “non-deal price” it hides the RRP.

“The RRP of this Lenovo IdeaPad is £219.99, but Amazon has raised the price to £250.35 for those who aren’t Prime members, effectively penalising you.”

What is Amazon Prime Day?

Amazon Prime Day is a 48-hour sale event that is taking place this year on October 8 and 9.

Advertisement

The last event was in July 2023, and this October marks the second ever annual event.

It’s exclusively available for Prime members, offering discounts on everything from the latest technology to sought after beauty items and top toys.

Bargain hunters look to score big savings on thousands of items, but it’s important to make sure that the publicised discount is as good as it seems.

How to compare prices

As usual we recommend readers shop around before taking reduced prices as face value.

Advertisement

Harry Rose, Editor of Which? magazine, said: “Amazon Prime Day may seem like the best time to snap up a good deal if you are a Prime member but don’t feel panicked into buying things you don’t need or haven’t budgeted for.

“When looking to buy something new, always do your research first by checking price comparison sites like PriceRunner and CamelCamelCamel, which not only show current prices at multiple retailers but also reveal a product’s pricing history.

Top Amazon Prime Day picks

SUN Savers Editor Lana Clements share her top picks and tips for saving on Amazon Prime Day.

Advertisement
  • Electricals: Major discounts on tech, such as Beats Studio3 Wireless Headphones (£139 from £349.95) and Samsung 55″ Smart TV (£339 from £505).
  • Kitchen Gadgets: Deals on popular items like the Tower Dual Basket Air Fryer (£78 from £139.99) and Ninja Temperature Kettle (£67.99 from £99.99).
  • Lego: Great savings on sets for all ages, including Harry Potter Hogwarts Castle (£104.49 from £149.99) and LEGO Minecraft Skeleton Dungeon (£18.97 from £24.99).
  • Beauty: Stock up on skincare and makeup with deals on INKEY List Hyaluronic Acid Serum (£5.94 from £7.99) and Maybelline Sky High Mascara (£7.19 from £12.99).
  • Kids’ Toys: Perfect for early Christmas shopping, with Crayola SuperTips Markers (£2.99 from £9.25) and Melissa & Doug Ice Cream Toy Shop (£29.99 from £49.99).
  • Christmas Gifts for Adults: Up to 30% off brands like Pepe Jeans and Levi, and luxury kitchenware from Le Creuset (£199.99 from £339).
  • Everyday Essentials: Discounts on essentials such as Amazon Toilet Roll (£6.49 for 18 rolls) and Whiskas Tasty Mix Pouches (£11.19 for 40).

Three ways to save:

  • Set deal alerts for specific items to receive notifications on price changes.
  • Use price comparison sites like Idealo.co.uk to ensure you’re getting the best value.
  • Check price history on Amazon-specific tracking websites like bobalob.com and camelcamelcamel.com.

“This allows you to work out whether the sale price genuinely represents good value.”

CamelCamelCamel is one of the key tools Mr Lewis references in the MoneySavingExpert article.

The website is exclusive to Amazon and allows shoppers to enter an item’s URL to reveal its price history, and see if it has previously been sold at a lower price.

You can also set up price alerts to let you know when it drops in price again.

That way you can be first in line for the lowest deals.

Advertisement

Other key ways to compare prices include searching for your specific product on a website and toggling in “Sort By” the cheapest items first.

You can then compare website-to-website which retailers are offering the cheapest products on specific products to help you secure the best deal.

Do you have a money problem that needs sorting? Get in touch by emailing money-sm@news.co.uk.

Plus, you can join our Sun Money Chats and Tips Facebook group to share your tips and stories

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Heartbreak leave can help employees recover from shattered relationships

Published

on

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

In recognition of the “negative emotional baggage” that can come after a relationship break-up, Ricardo Dublado, chief executive of Cebu Century Plaza Hotel in the Philippines, last year unveiled an unusual new staff policy: five paid days of heartbreak leave.

The time off, which can be taken annually provided the break-up is with a different person each year, was inspired by Dublado’s own experience. In the Philippines the idea is catching on: a parliamentary bill in February proposed that any worker going through a romantic break-up should be eligible for up to three days of unpaid leave. “Studies reveal the substantial toll break-ups take on individuals, affecting their emotional and mental wellbeing, leading to decreased productivity, absenteeism and higher healthcare costs,” said Congressman Lordan Suan.

Advertisement

Employers across the world have increasingly sought to make concessions for their workers’ personal lives, offering wellbeing days, flexible work and, in some cases, counselling services.

Some global companies may already encourage heartbreak leave under a different name. In the pandemic, employers introduced time off for wellbeing to differentiate themselves from competitors or give staff a discreet chance to look after their mental health or care for their families. Many continued, including software group Adobe, which offers six wellbeing days a year. Virgin Money gives five.

In the Philippines, Effel Santillan, human resources manager at Harbor Star Shipping Services, said employees suffering from lost love were generally allowed to take time off on a discretionary basis. “At the end of the day, the manager takes responsibility.”

UK employers including Tesco, the supermarket chain, and Metro Bank have targeted break-up support to families, signing up to the Parents Promise, created by Positive Parenting Alliance, an advocacy group. Employers make commitments to help parents who are separating from each other, including giving them a chance to work flexibly and helping them access counselling. In return, they receive support from the alliance.

Advertisement

Positive Parenting Alliance founder James Hayhurst wants “employers to recognise [separation] as a life event. If you’re going to separate, the employer can help you do it well.”

PwC, a signatory, said that while it did not have a specific divorce policy, working arrangements were designed to support big life events. “Everyone’s situation is unique, so we actively listen to our people to understand their needs,” Anne Hurst, the firm’s inclusion lead, said. “Our goal is to create a supportive environment that helps our people balance their personal and professional lives.”

In one 2023 study by researchers from the University of Minnesota, 44 per cent of respondents said going through divorce had a negative effect on work. People whose marriages ended reported an inability to focus or sleep and a tendency to break down in tears. “Crippling depression is slowing down my ability to socialise with my co-workers and supervisor,” said one.

However, a sizeable minority — 39 per cent — had a different experience, saying divorce was positive, freeing “up time and energy” and providing an opportunity for renewal.

Advertisement

The study suggested offering some help to people struggling with separation. Flexible scheduling or remote work, it said, may help employees manage “divorce-related appointments and also provide space to work . . . without placing an undue and unnecessary strain on emotional regulatory capacities”.

In the Philippines, meanwhile, Suan’s bill could face a tough hearing. Laws in the country do not guarantee time off for mental health problems on top of a statutory minimum of five days’ leave. The People Management Association of the Philippines, a professional body for human resources, has said that wellness leave is an “additional expense and additional interruption to business operations”.

Another question is whether heartbroken employees would take leave at all. Customer services worker Abigail Marquez, 27, said that in the event of a break-up she would not take advantage of the benefit as proposed in the bill, because it was unpaid. For some workers, protecting their income still takes priority over their heartache — or, as Marquez put it, “no money, no honey”.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Money

Pinebridge makes reported £565m bid for PRS REIT

Published

on

PRS REIT chairman to step down after pressure from activist investors

Pinebridge has offered the group’s board 103p per share, Sky News reported.

The post Pinebridge makes reported £565m bid for PRS REIT appeared first on Property Week.

Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Should James Cleverly try to choose his opponent in final round?

Published

on

This article is an on-site version of our Inside Politics newsletter. Subscribers can sign up here to get the newsletter delivered every weekday. If you’re not a subscriber, you can still receive the newsletter free for 30 days

Good morning. James Cleverly took a giant leap towards the final stage of the Conservative leadership contest yesterday. But who will join him, and should he try and game the outcome?

Inside Politics is edited by Georgina Quach. Read the previous edition of the newsletter here. Please send gossip, thoughts and feedback to insidepolitics@ft.com

Pick your battles

James Cleverly won the third ballot of the Conservative leadership contest. The former home secretary secured 39 votes, pulling ahead of Robert Jenrick, who shed two votes between the second and third ballots, ending up with 31 votes, while Kemi Badenoch picked up two votes to reach 30. Tom Tugendhat, who got 20 votes, has been eliminated. Only two contestants will go through to a final vote by the party membership.

Advertisement

The vast majority of Tugendhat’s supporters will, if my contact book is remotely representative, swing behind Cleverly in the next round, while Jenrick and Badenoch are now in a close fight for the other members’ slot. Cleverly will have more than enough votes going spare tomorrow to choose his opponent. Which one should he pick?

On the one hand, according to both the ConservativeHome members survey and YouGov’s party members poll, Cleverly would beat Robert Jenrick but lose to Badenoch. One argument is that he should make sure he faces Jenrick because he is, on paper, much more likely to beat him.

Bar chart of ConservativeHome's post-conference Tory member preferences, % of respondents showing There Chagos

I’m dubious about this one, though. In the past, both ConservativeHome and YouGov have overestimated the strength of the Tory right. I see no compelling reason to believe either survey has fixed that problem, and if Cleverly’s strength is being underestimated to anything like the degree that Jeremy Hunt and Rishi Sunak were in 2019 and 2022, he will comfortably beat either Jenrick or Badenoch.

On the other hand, Jenrick’s campaign team has shown itself to be more aggressive, more effective and more willing to go into the gutter. Cleverly may well have more to fear from a month in which the former immigration minister’s slick campaign machine attacks him, than one in which Badenoch wonders out loud about which part of the British state she thinks is too flabby and too generous.

Cleverly’s leadership prospects will be better served if he defeats his more formidable rival, which, according to the polls is Badenoch.

Advertisement

I’m also dubious about this one, because it may be that YouGov and ConservativeHome have fixed their over-representation problem and that by picking Badenoch he is starting a fight he can’t win.

My general view: life is too short to play silly tactical games. Given the parliamentary party is not large, at 121 MPs, you can always end up in a situation where the campaign tries to lend votes to a preferred opponent, some individual MPs freelance and you end up finishing third in embarrassing circumstances. (In 1990, the organisers of John Major, Michael Heseltine and Douglas Hurd’s campaigns for the Tory leadership met up for dinner afterwards to compare the size of their various promises: they discovered that about a third of their colleagues had lied through their teeth.) When you only have 121 votes to play with, you’re better off just maximising your own authority, because if you win, you will need it.

Now try this

(Georgina) Yesterday Stephen and I saw the play The Other Place, which comes with the subtitle After Antigone. It grapples with death and the aftermath. In a taut 80 minutes, the reinvented tragedy excels at ramping up the tension as the characters move within a newly renovated, sorrow ridden house, but the pace partly leaves some of the more problematic family dynamics feeling a little forced and under-developed.

Runs to November 9 at the National Theatre.

Advertisement

Top stories today

  • Crowd source | Immigration has driven the fastest UK population growth for half a century, according to official statistics that highlight the country’s demographic challenges. The ONS noted that deaths outnumbered births for the first time in 50 years, other than during the pandemic.

  • Diving out | Abu Dhabi’s sovereign wealth fund has written off its investment in Thames Water in a blow to the government as it gears up to host a summit designed to attract big institutional investors to the UK.

  • ‘MI5 has one hell of a job on its hands’ | Russian spies are on a “mission to generate mayhem” on Britain’s streets as Iran foments lethal plots at “an unprecedented pace and scale”, the head of the UK’s domestic intelligence service has warned.

  • Reeves presses ahead on borrowing | Rachel Reeves is pushing ahead with plans to borrow billions of pounds extra for infrastructure investment, despite concerns about the rising cost of UK government debt, the Guardian’s Kiran Stacey was first to report.

Recommended newsletters for you

US Election Countdown — Money and politics in the race for the White House. Sign up here

One Must-Read — Remarkable journalism you won’t want to miss. Sign up here

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Money

FCA consolidation review is too little too late

Published

on

Nic Cicutti
Nic Cicutti
Nic Cicutti – Illustration by Dan Murrell

What are we to make of the news the Financial Conduct Authority is to review consolidation in the advice market?

The regulator has written to advice and investment firm bosses noting an increase in the acquisition of firms or their assets over the past two years.

It warned that, while industry consolidation can provide benefits, various types of harm can occur where this is not done in a ‘prudent manner’ with effective controls to promote good outcomes.

The FCA says: “Where we receive notifications from individuals or firms to acquire or increase control in regulated firms, we will assess and challenge their suitability and the financial soundness of the acquisition.”

For the FCA to step in now seems a spectacular example of shutting the stable door after multiple horses have bolted

I think it’s a case of too little too late.

Advertisement

Back in November 2021, Money Marketing’s Lois Vallely penned a useful guide to consolidation in which she noted how its origins date back to the 1980s and 1990s heyday of DBS and M&E Network, which then bought Interdependence in 1999 to bring it under the Tenet umbrella.

In the early noughties, we also had Millfield, Berkeley Berry Birch and Inter-Alliance, several of them engaging in failed mergers with each other. None of these firms now exist in their present form, with shareholders – both individual and corporate – having taken a massive loss on their investments.

Undeterred by these exercises in value destruction, in 2005 Standard Life bought a 20% stake in the Tenet Group network. Tenet’s other shareholders – Norwich Union, Friends Provident and Aegon – each increased their stakes to around 20% in light of the deal.

Quite how anyone could have been remotely surprised by what had been screamingly obvious for years is anyone’s guess. Hundreds of ARs had exited Tenet in the years before it went under

As we know, earlier this year, Tenet went into administration. Its remaining 170-odd advice firms, numbering barely 350 authorised representatives (ARs), were offered the option of transferring to Openwork.

Advertisement

News that Tenet had called in the administrators was described in one story I read at the time as “shocking” – although quite how anyone could have been remotely surprised by what had been screamingly obvious for years is anyone’s guess. Hundreds of ARs had exited Tenet in the five years before it went under.

Even Tenet’s own review found the AR sector was subject to “significant change” from “external forces such as consolidation, increased regulation, digitisation, new technology expense and the broader inflationary environment”.

ARs themselves, meanwhile, will continue to be treated as disposable pawns on the financial advice chessboard

What these stories tell us is that providers and consolidators will always seek to buy or control product distribution or assets under management. Providers will repeatedly invest in the endlessly-failing dreams of senior executives at consolidators who tell them, yet again, things will be different this time round.

ARs themselves, meanwhile, will continue to be treated as disposable pawns on the financial advice chessboard. They either survive yet another round of takeovers or drop out, missed by no one but their clients – who receive a letter to say the business name has changed, or their adviser has left, or both.

Advertisement

We’re then offered an appointment with someone we didn’t choose to go to in the first place, providing a different service we didn’t ask for.

We put up with it because that’s just how it works

It happened to me 20 years ago. It’s happened to several of my friends, who are among many hundreds of thousands of clients with the same experience. And we put up with it because that’s just how it works.

For the FCA to step in now seems a spectacular example of shutting the stable door after multiple horses have bolted.

At this rate, I’m expecting the regulator to send out stern letters to chief executives saying it is determined to stamp out misselling of mortgage endowments and personal pensions. I can’t wait.

Advertisement

Nic Cicutti can be contacted at nic@inspiredmoney.co.uk

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Travel

Marriott unveils Four Points Flex by Sheraton brand

Published

on

Marriott unveils Four Points Flex by Sheraton brand

The group has signed an agreement with Resident Hotels to convert four Sleeperz Hotels in Cardiff, Dundee, Edinburgh and Newcastle to the new brand, with more properties set to follow

Continue reading Marriott unveils Four Points Flex by Sheraton brand at Business Traveller.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 WordupNews.com