Connect with us

Business

Why Canada could become the next nuclear energy ‘superpower’

Published

on

Is Reform UK's plan to get Farage into No 10 mission impossible?
NexGen An aerial photo of the site of NexGen's mine in the Athabasca Basin in northern Saskatchewan. The landscape is mostly forested, with work structures nestled on cleared land in the middle. NexGen

NexGen’s operation in Canada’s remote Athabasca Basin

Uranium is making a comeback thanks to a renewed focus on nuclear energy as a climate crisis solution. Canada, rich with high-grade deposits, could become a nuclear “superpower”. But can its potential be realised?

Leigh Curyer had been working in uranium mining for nearly two decades when he noticed a striking shift.

In 2011, the Fukushima nuclear plant disaster in Japan badly damaged the world’s view of nuclear power, and the price for the heavy metal – a critical component for nuclear fuel – cratered.

But the last five years has seen a reversal, with the global price of uranium spiking by more than 200%one of this year’s top-performing commodities.

Advertisement

Mr Curyer, an Australian-born businessman, credits this to a changing attitude that began soon after Microsoft founder Bill Gates touted nuclear energy as “ideal for dealing with climate change” in 2018.

Four years later, then-UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson pushed forward a policy of generating at least 25% of the country’s energy from nuclear.

Shortly after, the European Union voted to declare nuclear energy climate-friendly.

These events were “catalytic” for the uranium industry and a turning point for Mr Curyer’s company NexGen, which is behind the largest in-development uranium mine in Canada.

Advertisement

His phone began to ring with calls from investors worldwide – something that “had never happened in my previous 17 years in the industry”, he said.

NexGen A professional headshot of Leigh Curyer smiling, wearing a grey suit jacket, a light blue button-up shirt and a speckled dark blue tie.NexGen

Leigh Curyer is the head of NexGen, whose mine is the largest in development in Canada

NexGen, whose project is located in Canada’s remote, uranium-rich Athabasca Basin in northern Saskatchewan, is now worth nearly $4bn (£2.98bn), despite the fact that the mine won’t be commercially operational until at least 2028.

If fully cleared by regulators, NexGen’s project alone could push Canada to become the world’s largest producer of uranium over the coming decade, knocking Kazakhstan out of the number one spot.

Other companies have also rushed to Saskatchewan to capitalise on the boom, starting their own exploration projects in the region, while existing players re-opened dormant mines.

Advertisement

With its rich resources, Canada’s mining companies see the country playing a major role in the future of nuclear energy, meeting a demand for uranium that is poised to rise after nearly two dozen countries committed in COP28 climate conference to tripling their nuclear energy output by 2050.

Nuclear energy is often hailed for its low carbon emissions compared to other sources like natural gas or coal.

The World Nuclear Association estimates that 10% of power generated worldwide comes from nuclear sources, while more than 50% is still generated by gas or coal.

At this year’s COP29, the focus has been on ramping up funding for nuclear projects in the wake of a recent UN report indicating that current policies and investments fall short of what is needed to slow global temperature rise.

Advertisement

Canada’s role in supplying the commodity is made more urgent by Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, particularly for the US, which had relied heavily on Russian-supplied enriched uranium to fire up its commercial nuclear reactors.

Mr Curyer believes his mine could prove to be “absolutely critical” to America’s nuclear energy future, as the US is now hunting for alternatives to Russia, including by ramping up exploration on its own soil.

Uranium can be found around the world, though it is heavily present in Canada, Australia and Kazakhstan.

But what makes Canada’s Athabasca Region unique is that its uranium is especially high grade, said Markus Piro, a professor of nuclear engineering at McMaster University.

Advertisement

Canada has set strict rules for the sale of its uranium to other countries, Prof Piro said, and mandates it only be used for nuclear power generation.

The country is also referred to as a “tier-one nuclear nation”, he said, due to its capability to produce nuclear fuel from the mining to the manufacturing stage.

Once mined, uranium is milled to produce what is called calcined yellowcake, and then enriched, either at facilities in Canada or overseas, to create fuel for nuclear reactors.

“We’ve got a one-stop shop here in Canada, not every nation’s like that,” Prof Piro said.

Advertisement

Canada is currently the world’s second largest producer of uranium, accounting for roughly 13% of the total global output, according to the Canadian government. NexGen anticipates that once its mine is operational, it will boost that to 25%.

Meanwhile, Cameco, which has been mining uranium in Saskatchewan since 1988 that supplies 30 nuclear reactors around the world, re-opened two of its mines in late 2022 to increase output.

CEO Tim Gitzel told the BBC that he believes “Canada could be a nuclear superpower around the world”.

Advertisement

But enthusiasm around nuclear energy is not without its critics.

Some environmental groups worry nuclear projects are too costly and come with timelines that do not meet the urgency of the climate crisis.

Data from the UK-based World Nuclear Association shows that 60 nuclear reactors are under construction across 16 countries, most of them in China, and a further 110 are in the planning stages.

Some are expected to come online this year – others won’t be ready until at least the end of the decade.

Advertisement

Meanwhile, more than 100 nuclear plants have been closed in the last two decades around the world, including New York State’s sole nuclear power plant, which was retired in 2021 due to high operating costs and environmental and safety concerns.

Plants were also shuttered in Massachusetts, Pennsylvania, and Quebec, Canada.

And not all of Canada is on board with the country’s uranium industry.

British Columbia sits on its own supply of uranium but has not allowed any nuclear plants or uranium mines to operate in the province since 1980.

Advertisement

Critics have also expressed concern about radioactive waste nuclear reactors leave behind for future generations.

Others fear another Fukushima-scale disaster, where a tsunami disabled three reactors, causing the release of highly radioactive materials and forcing mass evacuations.

“The risk is not zero, that is for sure” though t can be reduced, said Prof Piro.

“Even though amongst the general public there are mixed feelings about it, the reality is that it has produced very safe, very reliable and affordable electricity worldwide.”

Advertisement

The industry maintains the technology is both promising and viable.

Mr Gitzel of Cameco said the industry has learned from past safety errors.

“And the public is buying on,” he said. “I can tell you that we have in Canada great public support for nuclear power.”

A 2023 Ipsos poll indicates that 55% of Canadians support nuclear energy.

Advertisement
Getty Images A red school bus driving on a residential road with a lake and forest in the background, photographed in Saskatchewan's Uranium City in 1975. Getty Images

Uranium City, photographed in this 1975 photo, was once home to 2,500 residents

Still, past uranium booms in Canada have turned into dramatic busts.

North of NexGen’s proposed mine stands Uranium City, once home to 2,500 residents in its mid-20th Century heyday. In 1982, a major local mining firm shuttered operations over high costs and a soft market for uranium.

Now, Uranium City’s population is 91 people.

But investors argue that there is a true global burgeoning demand for the commodity that poses a golden opportunity for Canada.

Advertisement

NexGen anticipates that construction on its mine – which is awaiting clearance from Canada’s federal nuclear regulator – will begin early next year.

Mr Gitzel says around 100 other companies are now actively exploring Saskatchewan for deposits.

As to when it will be on the market remains unclear.

Mr Gitzel cautioned that some companies have started explorations in the past that never reached production stage. The timeline to get mining projects approved in Canada can also be lengthy.

Advertisement

“Building a mine is going to take five to 10 years, and so far, the only ones in operation are ours, so we will wait and see how it plays out,” he said.

For Mr Curyer, it is crucial that his project and others are realised in the next four years, for both Canada and the world.

“Otherwise, there is going to be a shortage in uranium, and that will subsequently impact power prices,” he said.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Business

Italy holds dozens and freezes €520mn over ‘mafia tax fraud’ against EU

Published

on

Guardia di Finanza

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

Italian authorities and their European counterparts have arrested 43 people and seized assets worth €520mn including luxury cars and boats in a crackdown on an alleged tax fraud scheme run by Italian mafia groups.

The European Public Prosecutor’s Office, which led the investigation, said members of several Italian criminal groups came together to run a complex and “highly profitable tax evasion scheme”. The scheme, dubbed a “VAT carousel fraud”, involved invoices for €1.3bn worth of laptops, earpods and other electronic goods.

Advertisement

The alleged fraud involved the creation of fake companies — or “missing traders” or “ghost companies” — in Italy, other EU countries and other countries outside the EU, which would buy and sell goods between them, then vanish without fulfilling their tax obligations.

The network provided a paper trail for claims for fraudulent VAT reimbursement from Italian authorities. 

The assets frozen on Thursday, to compensate the EU and Italian authorities for money lost through the unwarranted VAT reimbursements, includes 129 bank accounts, nearly 200 apartments, homes and other real estate holdings, and 44 luxury cars and boats, the EPPO said.

Participants in the scheme included members of the Naples-based Camorra and Sicily’s Cosa Nostra, which invested as a means of laundering money from other criminal activities, Italian authorities said.

Advertisement

“Mafia methods” were used to “settle conflicts that arose within the criminal syndicate between the members of the different criminal organisations”, the EPPO said in a statement. 

Of those arrested on Thursday, 34 have been sent to prison to await trial, while nine are under house arrest, authorities said. In addition to the 43 people held in Italy, seven European arrest warrants were issued for suspects in Bulgaria, Czech Republic, the Netherlands, Spain and non-EU countries.

In total, police across 10 EU countries carried out searches at about 160 locations on Thursday as they hunted for more evidence of the scheme, which is believed to have involved at least 195 people and about 400 companies.

Laura Kövesi, the European chief prosecutor, said the case was a “defining investigation” for the EPPO, which has grown increasingly anxious about the penetration of Italy’s sophisticated organised crime groups into financial fraud across Europe. 

Advertisement

“It has been a while since we started to ring the alarm bell about dangerous organised crime groups’ heavy involvement in fraud [against] the EU budget,” she said, citing the “colossal damages” and “the threat to our internal security” caused by such activities.

“We now shed light on a first such big case,” Kövesi said.   

Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni hailed the arrests and the asset seizures, which she said demonstrated “the government’s firm commitment to combating tax evasion, one of our top priorities”.

The crackdown on Thursday comes seven months after Italian authorities seized assets worth €600mn — including villas, luxury cars, watches and jewellery — and arrested 22 people in connection with alleged fraud involving the EU’s €800bn post-pandemic recovery fund.

Advertisement

Of those accused in that case, two have already admitted to wrongdoing through a plea deal, while the trials for the rest began this week.

Source link

Continue Reading

Money

Everything you need to know about disabled persons trusts

Published

on

Vulnerability is more than just a tick-box exercise
shutterstock / FuzzBones

The term ‘disabled persons trust’ is frequently used to describe any trust where a beneficiary is deemed vulnerable or disabled. It is not a specific type of trust.

A disabled persons trust can be any discretionary, interest-in-possession or absolute trust. The key is whether the beneficiary’s vulnerability qualifies the trust for income and capital gains tax (CGT) relief or if their disability qualifies the trust for special inheritance tax (IHT) treatment.

So, who qualifies as a vulnerable or disabled beneficiary?

Vulnerable only:

  • A child under 18 where at least one parent has died – known as a ‘relevant minor’

Vulnerable and disabled:

  • A person with a mental health condition covered by the Mental Health Act 1983
  • A disabled person who is eligiblefor any of the following benefits (even if they’re not receiving them): adult disability payment; armed forces independence payment; attendance allowance; child disability payment; constant attendance allowance; disability living allowance (for adults or children); industrial injuries disablement benefit; personal independence payment.

Income tax and CGT relief

Trusts with a vulnerable beneficiary can make a ‘vulnerable beneficiary election’ with HM Revenue & Customs, allowing them to qualify for income tax and CGT relief.

Advertisement

Where the trust has a liability to income or CGT, they may be eligible for a deduction. This is calculated as follows:

  1. Trustees calculate the trust’s tax liability – using the trust rates of tax and assuming no relief
  2. Trustees then calculate the tax liability the vulnerable person would have on the same income/capital gains if taxed at their marginal rate.
  3. The trustees claim the difference between these two figures as a deduction on their tax liability.

The relief only applies if it is the trust which is liable to the tax.  For example, a discretionary trust in receipt of interest and dividends. Absolute trusts place the income tax and capital gains liability on the beneficiary directly, so the relief is not necessary.

Higher CGT exemption

Trusts eligible for the vulnerable beneficiary election will have a higher CGT annual exempt amount. This is currently £3,000 (2024/25, usually £1,500), though this allowance may be reduced where the settlor has created multiple trusts.

Trusts which hold investment bonds

Advertisement

Bonds are taxed under chargeable event rules, chargeable gains are tax as income. Under these rules, the settlor of a discretionary or interest in possession trust is liable to income tax on gains arising during their lifetime or tax year of their death. The trustees only have a liability in the following tax years. Even then, the bond can be assigned directly to a beneficiary to be taxed at their marginal rate. Therefore, it may not be necessary for the trustees to make the vulnerable beneficiary election.

If the trust has multiple beneficiaries

If there are beneficiaries who do not qualify as vulnerable, the trustees must segregate assets held for them. The relief only applies for the portion of the trust fund held for the vulnerable beneficiary.

If there is more than one vulnerable beneficiary, the trustees must make an election for each.

Advertisement

Claiming the relief

Trustees must first submit a vulnerable beneficiary election form (VPE1) to HMRC. If there is more than one vulnerable beneficiary, one form must be submitted for each.

Trustees claim the income tax and CGT relief when submitting their annual self-assessment (SA900). Self-assessment must be completed by 31 January following the end of the tax year.

The relief ends on the death of the vulnerable beneficiary, or if they cease to qualify.

Advertisement

Calculating the relief can be complicated, so trustees should consider engaging an accountant. Example calculations are also available from HMRC.

Inheritance tax

A trust may receive special IHT treatment where one of the following applies:

  • One or more beneficiary is disabled or has a condition which is expected to make them disabled.
  • The trust is a ‘bereaved minors’ trust. This is where one or more of the beneficiary’s parents has died creating a trust in their will (or via the rules of intestacy) for their minor child.

The following special treatment is applied:

  • A gift to a disabled persons trust is a potentially exempt transfer regardless of the type of trust used. This means there will be no 20% entry charge for exceeding the nil rate band.
  • Trusts will not be subject to the 10-yearly periodic or exit charges.

Restrictions on the trust fund

To qualify, there are restrictions which must be followed:

Advertisement
  • For trusts created before 8 April 2013, at least half of the payments from the trust must go to the disabled person during their lifetime.
  • For trusts created on or after 8 April 2013, all payments must go to the disabled person. However, up to £3,000 per year (or 3% of the trust’s value, if lower) can be paid to other beneficiaries.
  • Trusts of bereaved minors (trusts created by the will of the child’s parent) must pay all assets to the beneficiary on attaining age 18 or before.

While it is possible to use an ‘off the shelf’ draft trust deed, a settlor of a disabled persons trust may choose instead to instruct a legal adviser to draft a bespoke trust document which enforces these restrictions on the trustees.

On death of the beneficiary

Any part of the trust fund held for a disabled beneficiary is treated as part of their estate for the purposes of calculating their IHT liability.

Claiming the special treatment

There is no election or application required for the treatment to apply. However, trustees and settlors are advised to keep good records which can help them demonstrate that the special treatment applies if needed.

Advertisement

Means-tested benefits

A settlor looking to create a trust for a disabled or vulnerable person is likely to be keen not to disrupt any entitlement to means tested benefits. These are benefits where an individual’s capital and income are used to assess whether they are entitled to a benefit and how much they might receive.

Bare trust

Any assets held in a bare trust will be considered for any means-tested benefits the beneficiary claims. This is because the beneficiary has a vested right in the trust fund. There is one notable exception to this; capital and income are excluded from means testing if the trust settled with the award of a personal injury claim for the beneficiary of the trust. The trust must be settled within 12 months of the award.

Advertisement

Discretionary trust

Any assets held within a discretionary trust are not usually considered for means tested benefits as no beneficiary has a vested right in the trust fund. However, any capital or income paid to the beneficiary will be considered in the assessment.

In either case, the position is unchanged if a beneficiary qualifies as a vulnerable or disabled person.

 Trust registration

Advertisement

Trusts for disabled beneficiaries or bereaved minors are exempted from registration during the lifetime of the disabled beneficiary. If the trust ceases to qualify for special treatment the trustees must register the trust within 90 days.

Disabled persons trusts:

  Income tax Capital gains tax Inheritance tax Inclusion for means-tested benefits
Bare trust Beneficiary’s marginal rate Beneficiary’s marginal rate

– Beneficiary’s estate for IHT

– No entry / periodic / exit charges

Advertisement
The beneficiary’s share of trust capital and income are included
Discretionary
– not eligible for relief
Rate applicable to trusts* Rate applicable to trusts*

– Not within beneficiary’s estate

– Entry / periodic / exit charges apply

Capital and income distributed to the beneficiary only
Discretionary
– eligible for relief
Beneficiary’s marginal rate** Beneficiary’s marginal rate**

– Not within beneficiary’s estate

– No entry / periodic / exit charges apply

Advertisement
Capital and income distributed to the beneficiary only

*Rate applicable to trusts: Income Tax 39.35% (dividend) 45% (all other income). 0% on all income if below £500. Capital Gains 20% annual exempt amount up to £1,500) 2024/25

**Assuming the trust fund is applied for the vulnerable beneficiary.

Rachael Griffin is a tax and financial planning expert at Quilter

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Business

Republicans gear up to take control of Washington

Published

on

Donald Trump speaks on stage in front of US flags at a House Republicans Conference meeting on Capitol Hill on Wednesday

This is an on-site version of the White House Watch newsletter. You can read the previous edition here. Sign up for free here to get it on Tuesdays and Thursdays. Email us at whitehousewatch@ft.com

Good morning and welcome to White House Watch. Let’s dive into:

  • Republicans’ impending grip on Washington

  • The anti-woke Pentagon pick

  • A shocking attorney-general choice

Donald Trump took a victory lap through Washington yesterday, meeting Joe Biden and relishing Republicans’ impending grip on power.

The president-elect’s hold on Washington is complete. Last night Republican lawmakers secured a majority in the House, giving them control of both chambers of Congress. With loyal allies in the House and Senate, Trump will have a firmer grasp on Congress than in his first term and latitude to push through his legislative priorities. [free to read]. 

Advertisement

A top aim will be renewing and expanding the sweeping tax reforms Trump enacted during his first term. He also wants to curb regulation, overhaul healthcare, carry out “mass deportations” of undocumented migrants and slap huge tariffs on imported goods.

Yesterday, the president-elect gave Speaker of the House Mike Johnson a ringing endorsement, calling for the fierce Trump ally to keep his gavel should the chamber be called for Republicans.

But this doesn’t mean it will be completely smooth sailing for Trump.

Republicans chose South Dakota senator John Thune to be the Senate majority leader, setting him up as a potential check on Trump’s agenda. This was a rebuke to Trump allies, including Elon Musk, who pushed for Florida senator Rick Scott to get the job. 

Advertisement

Thune is viewed as more of an “establishment” Republican. He and Trump have had a frosty relationship in the past, though the senator said that “this Republican team is united behind President Trump’s agenda”.

Even though Johnson has won an internal Republican nod to keep the speakership, holding on to the gavel is not guaranteed. He faces election by the full House, and many of his potential detractors saw this closed-door election as a soft vote, with real negotiations to take place between now and January 3, Florida representative Anna Paulina Luna told reporters. 

As Trump plucks House Republicans for executive branch roles, he also threatens Johnson’s margins.

And Democrats, along with a handful of moderate Republicans, could still throw up roadblocks by exerting leverage in narrow but meaningful ways. Most legislation needs to pass the Senate with 60 votes. Since Republicans hold 53 seats, Democrats could block some of Trump’s legislative goals.

Advertisement

Transitional times: the latest headlines

What we’re hearing

As Trump stacks his national security team with hardliners and loyalists, his pick for secretary of defence is particularly eyebrow-raising [free to read].

Pete Hegseth, a military veteran, has built a lucrative career as a Fox News personality by blaming wokeness for US blunders in Iraq and Afghanistan.

In his rightwing broadcasts, he’s outlined a vision for the US military that closely aligns with Trump’s view of the country: an intrepid fighting force that has been reduced to impotency by trying to be more inclusive.

His nomination has prompted a backlash in the US. Paul Rieckhoff, founder of Independent Veterans of America, which helps politically independent veterans run for office, said:

Advertisement

He is unqualified, and he is the most overtly and extreme political nominee we’ve ever seen. This is a bomb thrower.

Former Trump administration officials who have liked the president-elect’s other picks for top national security jobs have been dismayed by his Pentagon choice, with one telling the FT that the decision was “crazy”. And some Republican senators — who will need to confirm Hegseth’s appointment — don’t seem completely convinced by his nomination.

His selection has also shocked the US’s European allies. He’s “a total clown show”, said John Foreman, former UK defence attaché in Moscow. “The guy seems interested in fighting culture wars within the Department of Defense and purging enemies.”

Hegseth’s view of the military can be boiled down to a line in his book, titled The War on Warriors: Behind the Betrayal of the Men Who Keep Us Free, where he warns that “red-blooded American men will have to save” the liberal elite’s “candy asses”.

Team 47: who’s made the cut

Controversial Florida congressman Matt Gaetz, who resigned last night, has been tapped to be attorney-general.

Advertisement

Trump has nominated former congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard, who is known for her pro-Russia views, to be director of national intelligence.

John Ratcliffe, who was DNI during Trump’s first term, has been selected as CIA director.

Trump has chosen Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy to lead a “department of government efficiency” to slash government rules, bureaucracy and spending.

Ex-Arkansas governor Mike Huckabee will be the US ambassador to Israel, while investor Steve Witkoff will be Trump’s special Middle East envoy, choices celebrated by the Israeli right.

Advertisement

Wall Street investors Scott Bessent and Howard Lutnick are the leading contenders to be Treasury secretary.

Viewpoints

Recommended newsletters for you

FT Exclusive — Be the first to see exclusive FT scoops, features, analysis and investigations. Sign up here

Breaking News — Be alerted to the latest stories as soon as they’re published. Sign up here

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Money

Over a quarter of a million households on benefits have payments STOPPED – how to avoid it happening to you

Published

on

Over a quarter of a million households on benefits have payments STOPPED – how to avoid it happening to you

OVER a quarter of a million households have had their benefit payments stopped after failing to act on a key deadline.

New government figures show 318,834 (up from 284,660 reported in August) benefits claimants have lost out by not moving to Universal Credit within an important three-month window.

Two million people on legacy benefits are gradually moving to Universal Credit under a process known as managed migration.

Advertisement

Universal Credit was set up to replace legacy benefits and kicked off in November 2022 after a successful pilot in July 2019.

As part of the process, eligible households on legacy benefits, including tax credits, are sent “migration notices” in the post which tell them how to make the move to Universal Credit as it’s not automatic.

Households must apply for Universal Credit within three months of receiving their managed migration letter.

Failing to do this can result in benefits being stopped.

Advertisement

Between July 2022 and September 30, 2024, the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) sent almost 1.4 million migration notices.

However, according to the DWP’s latest figures, 318,834 individuals lost their benefits after failing to act on migration notices received between July 2022 and June 2024.

Some 883,944 individuals have since made successful claims for Universal Credit, and another 166,594 are still in the process of transitioning.

Ayla Ozmen, director of policy and campaigns at Z2K, said: “We’re concerned to see that more people have had vital benefit payments stopped as part of the government’s plan to move people on to Universal Credit.

Advertisement

“The government now looks to have moved all disabled people on to Universal Credit by March 2026, and we are worried that more people may miss the deadline and have their benefits stopped, with potentially disastrous results.

Three key benefits that YOU could be missing out on, and one even gives you a free TV Licence

“The government needs to ensure that appropriate safeguards are put in place to stop disabled people being left with nothing to live on.”

Experts have previously warned that managed migration poses a risk to vulnerable people who face losing money.

Top bosses at charities, including Mind, The Trussell Trust, Turn2Us and the Money and Mental Health Policy Institute, said in 2022 that around 700,000 with mental health problems, learning disabilities, and dementia could struggle to engage with the process.

Advertisement

More than 20 organisations have called on the government to halt managed migration to fix flaws in the system that could cause those at risk to fall through.

Which benefits are stopping?

UNIVERSAL Credit is replacing six benefits under the old welfare system, commonly called legacy benefits. They are:

  • Working tax credit
  • Child tax credit
  • Income-based jobseeker’s allowance
  • Income support
  • income-related employment and support allowance
  • Housing benefit

If you’re on any of these benefits now, you can choose to move over – but you might not be better off.

You should consider carefully what moving over means for your money, as you can’t move back once you’re on Universal Credit.

Advertisement

Using an online benefits calculator, which is free and easy to use from charities such as Turn2Us and EntitledTo, can help you compare.

You may be moved to Universal Credit if your circumstances change, such as moving home, changing your working hours, or having a baby.

But eventually everyone will be moved over to Universal Credit under the managed migration process.

MANAGED MIGRATION PROGRESS

In January, the government announced the number of migration notices it plans to send out in the coming financial year.

Advertisement

Before this date, the focus was sending migration notices to households claiming tax credits only.

However, 110,000 income support claimants and a further 120,000 claiming tax credits with housing benefit started receiving their letters in April.

Over 100,000 housing benefit-only claimants were contacted in June.

More than 90,000 people claiming employment and support allowance (ESA) along with child tax credits started being asked to switch in July.

Advertisement

Meanwhile, 20,000 claimants on jobseekers allowance (JSA) were contacted in September.

The Sun previously reported that, in August, those claiming tax credits who are over state pension age will be asked to apply for either Universal Credit or pension credit.

It was initially planned that those claiming income-related ESA alone would not be moved until 2028.

However, the DWP brought forward plans to move these households to Universal Credit by the end of 2025.

Advertisement

Since September 2024, 800,000 households have begun receiving letters explaining how to move from ESA to Universal Credit.

HELP CLAIMING UNIVERSAL CREDIT

As well as benefit calculators, anyone moving from tax credits to Universal Credit can find help in a number of ways.

You can visit your local Jobcentre by searching at find-your-nearest-jobcentre.dwp.gov.uk/.

There’s also a free service called Help to Claim from Citizen’s Advice:

Advertisement
  • England: 0800 144 8 444
  • Scotland: 0800 023 2581
  • Wales: 08000 241 220

You can also get help online from advisers at citizensadvice.org.uk/about-us/contact-us/contact-us/help-to-claim/.

Will I be better off on Universal Credit?

ANALYSIS by James Flanders, The Sun’s Chief Consumer Reporter:

Around 1.4million people on legacy benefits will be better off after switching to Universal Credit, according to the government.

A further 300,000 would see no change in payments, while around 900,000 would be worse off under Universal Credit.

Advertisement

Of these, around 600,000 can get top-up payments (transitional protection) if they move under the managed migration process, so they don’t lose out on cash immediately.

The majority of those – around 400,000 – are claiming employment support allowance (ESA).

Around 100,000 are on tax credits, while fewer than 50,000 each on other legacy benefits are expected to be affected.

Those who move voluntarily and are worse off won’t get these top-up payments and could lose cash.

Advertisement

Those who miss the managed migration deadline and later make a claim may not get transitional protection.

The clock starts ticking on the three-month countdown from the date of the first letter, and reminders are sent via post and text message.

There is a one-month grace period after this, during which any claim to Universal Credit is backdated, and transitional protection can still be awarded.

Examples of those who may be entitled to less on Universal Credit include:

Advertisement
  • Households getting ESA and the severe disability premium and enhanced disability premium
  • Households with the lower disabled child addition on legacy benefits
  • Self-employed households who are subject to the Minimum Income Floor after the 12-month grace period has ended
  • In-work households that worked a specific number of hours (e.g. lone parent working 16 hours claiming working tax credits
  • Households receiving tax credits with savings of more than £6,000 (and up to £16,000)

Either way, if these households don’t switch in the future, they risk missing out on any future benefit increase and seeing payments frozen.

Source link

Continue Reading

Travel

New adventure park to open as part of up-and-coming seaside town’s £7.5million renovation

Published

on

Newhaven Fort will be opening a new adventure playground

AN up-and-coming seaside town is set to get a huge new adventure park as part of a multi-million renovation.

The new playground will be part of the Newhaven Fort, which is currently closed.

Newhaven Fort will be opening a new adventure playground

3

Newhaven Fort will be opening a new adventure playgroundCredit: Alamy
The park will be a 'a celebration of Victorian innovation'

3

Advertisement
The park will be a ‘a celebration of Victorian innovation’Credit: Ace Media

The park will be a “a celebration of Victorian innovation” which mirrors the fort’s history.

There will be a large tubular slide attached to a Victorian “dirigible” – a blimp like structure.

A steam crane-inspired lookout tower, with a secret entrance for kids.

The sheltered play area is called Ardagh’s workshop, named after the Fort’s original architect, Lieutenant John Charles Ardagh.

Advertisement

Read more on seaside town

There will also be accessible play features such as “sound play, sensory items, interactive speaking tubes and an accessible trampoline and roundabout”.

CAP.CO has an impressive track record, having created outdoor play spaces at numerous heritage sites including Windsor Great Park, Blenheim Palace and the National Maritime Museum.

It has been created by adventure play specialists CAP.CO, who have also worked on projects and Blenheim Palace and Windsor Great Park.

designer and ‘Professor of Play’ Jono Burgess said they wanted the design to “reflect the history and character of the fort”.

Advertisement

They added: “Since the Fort was built in the Victorian era, we wanted to celebrate the ingenuity and inventive spirit of the 1800s.

“Our goal is to design and build an inclusive adventure playground which kids will want to return to again and again to challenge themselves, make new friends and have fun.”

Exploring the UK’s Hidden Coastal Gems

Newhaven Fort will reopen in February 2025, following a £7.5million restoration.

The fort was the largest defence network built in Sussex in the 19th century, built due to the threat of Napoleon the Third.

Advertisement

Along with the playground there will be new interactive exhibitions and a refurbished Battery Observation Post with views out to sea.

The seaside town has revealed plans to become a more popular staycation destination.

Near to Brighton and Eastbourne, Newhaven’s only beach could reopen.

West Beach closed back in 2008 due to safety concerns but hopes to reopen soon.

Advertisement

There are also 15 huge murals across Newhaven as part of the June Look Again Supergraphics Festival.

Newhaven was even nearly home to the UK’s largest waterpark but these plans were scrapped.

Corinne Day, programme director at Newhaven Enterprise Zone (NEZ), said: “Having an updated town centre is just one of the factors that will build on its success as we look to transform Newhaven into a major contributor to the Sussex economy by 2030.”

Sussex was recently named one of the best places to visit in 2025.

Advertisement

And here’s West Sussex’s best kept secret, according to locals.

The Sun Travel team reveal their favourite winter seaside destinations in the UK

The park will open next year

3

The park will open next yearCredit: Ace Media

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Business

What is Rachel Reeves’ plan for pension funds?

Published

on

Is Reform UK's plan to get Farage into No 10 mission impossible?
Reuters Rachel Reeves stands at a lectern at the Treasury with a union flag behind her.Reuters

Chancellor Rachel Reeves says she wants pension schemes to “fire up the economy”

Plans for a major shake-up of pension funds have been announced by the chancellor, Rachel Reeves.

She wants to create pension “megafunds” by merging the UK’s 86 council schemes, using the set-up in Canada and Australia as a model.

Other proposals suggest pension schemes need to reach a certain size or pool together. Larger funds could then be invested in UK infrastructure projects, the government says.

So, will this affect people with pension savings?

Advertisement

Which pension funds are involved?

The government says the Local Government Pension Scheme (LGPS) can get more from investments – while tackling a £2bn bill for fees – by joining together.

There are 86 local government pension funds in England and Wales, which are mainly paid into by local government workers.

These individually managed funds are divided by local authority, making it more costly, because each fund is paying its own management and administration fees.

Advertisement

Between them, they have 6.5 million members and manage assets worth £354bn.

The schemes are all part of the LGPS which is the seventh-largest in the world, according to the UK government.

Most of its participants are low-paid women.

Under Reeves’ plans, the funds would be consolidated in some way, although at present it is unclear exactly how.

Advertisement

She may ask them to pool their assets and resources, or she may ask them to merge with one another to create a smaller number of larger funds, which would benefit from greater financial firepower and fewer costs.

The LGPS is a defined benefit scheme which means that, when it is time to draw their pensions, its savers get an agreed amount based on their salary, no matter what the fund is worth at the time.

So drawing scheme into “megafunds” will make little, or no, difference to what they receive.

That is different to private pension pots, which rise and fall in value depending on how investments perform.

Advertisement

Why copy Canada and Australia?

The “Maple 8” is a group of vast Canadian pension funds, including the Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan, which manages assets worth C$247.5bn (£141.8bn), and the Canada Pension Plan, whose assets are worth C$409.6bn.

While UK pension schemes tend to invest more in assets like equities and bonds, their Canadian rivals focus more on private markets.

The Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan, for example, only has 7% of its assets in listed equities, compared with 60% for traditional pension funds.

Advertisement

Instead, it skews its investments towards private markets, including infrastructure (including a 25% stake in British energy giant SSE), real estate and private equity deals.

This kind of model is not without risk, however.

The Ontario Municipal Employees Retirement System is the largest investor in the troubled Thames Water, which has been highlighted by those questioning Reeves’ plans.

Why is bigger supposed to be better?

Advertisement

Individually, the UK’s 86 local government pension schemes vary in size, from Greater Manchester’s massive £30bn fund all the way down to several schemes which are “sub-£1bn”, according to Joanne Donnelly, board secretary at the Local Government Pension Scheme Advisory Board.

Running these schemes costs money. Each one must pay administration, governance and management costs, which can build up – last year, they increased by £28m.

Like her predecessor, Jeremy Hunt, who also announced plans for a Canadian-style model, the chancellor believes consolidation would save money.

That would in turn “deliver better returns for savers and unlock billions of pounds of investment”.

Advertisement

Other chancellors have aimed to make similar moves, including George Osborne who, in 2015, set out plans for local government schemes to pool resources,

Does everyone agree with the idea?

Tracy Blackwell, chief executive of Pension Insurance Corporation, told the BBC: “I think by having the scale and the right expertise internally to invest in a wide range of assets, they’ll be able to invest in a lot more than what they can invest in now.”

However, some argue megafunds would not invest so much in smaller projects while some claim the changes could bring risks for pension savers.

Advertisement

“Conflating a government goal of driving investment in the UK and people’s retirement outcomes brings a danger because the risks are all taken with members’ money,” said Tom Selby at investment platform AJ Bell.

He said the current system encourages trustees to deliver the best outcome for members rather than focus on UK-wide economic growth, which might mean investing outside the UK.

Others question whether there are enough big UK projects to invest in.

“Large funds need substantial, reliable projects to generate returns, but the market may struggle to offer enough of these opportunities, especially in the infrastructure sector,” said Jon Greer, head of retirement policy at wealth manager Quilter.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 WordupNews.com