Connect with us

News

CPS did not prosecute Harrods owner twice

Published

on

CPS did not prosecute Harrods owner twice
Getty Images Late Harrods department store owner Mohamed Al Fayed looks towards a camera with his head at an angle.Getty Images

Late Harrods department store owner Mohamed Al Fayed has been accused of rape and sexual assault

The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has said it twice did not bring charges against Mohamed Al Fayed over sex abuse claims.

Fresh allegations are being made about the late billionaire who owned Harrods and who died last year at the age of 94.

A BBC documentary has led to dozens of women coming forward to say they were raped or sexually assaulted by Egyptian businessman Fayed.

The CPS said on Sunday it considered bringing charges against Fayed in 2009 and 2015 – but on both occasions it “concluded there was no realistic prospect of a conviction”.

Advertisement

In 2008, the Metropolitan Police investigated Fayed after a 15-year-old girl said he sexually assaulted her in the Harrods boardroom.

The force said it handed a file of evidence to the CPS – a step which has to be taken before charges can be issued – but prosecutors decided no further action should be taken.

A CPS spokesperson said: “We reviewed files of evidence presented by the police in 2009 and 2015.

“To bring a prosecution the CPS must be confident there is a realistic prospect of conviction – in each instance our prosecutors looked carefully at the evidence and concluded this wasn’t the case.”

Advertisement

Three other investigations into claims made by three other women – in 2018, 2021 and 2023 – got to an advanced enough stage that the CPS was called in to advise detectives.

But, in those instances a full file of evidence was never passed to prosecutors.

Fayed bought Harrods in 1985 and sold it in 2010.

More than 20 women have told the BBC the businessman sexually assaulted or raped them while they worked at Harrods luxury department store in London.

Advertisement

The legal team representing many of the women the BBC has spoken to outlined their case against Harrods on Friday.

Harrods’ current owners said earlier this week they were “utterly appalled” by the allegations and that “victims were failed”.

‘He really was a monster’: Fayed survivor says she is no longer afraid

The company said it is a “very different organisation” now and “seeks to put the welfare of our employees at the heart of everything we do”.

Advertisement

The department store’s new owners have a compensation scheme for ex-employees who say they were attacked by Fayed, which is separate to the legal action being taken by some accusers.

Harrods has already reached financial settlements with the majority of people who have approached them since 2023, and has had new inquiries this week.

Harrods is accepting vicarious liability for the actions of Fayed, and there are no non-disclosure agreements attached to the settlements.

Dean Armstrong KC, one of the barristers representing alleged victims, said he was “at a loss” as to what the new information Harrods received in 2023 may have been.

Advertisement

In a BBC interview on Saturday, he argued the new owners – who bought Harrods in 2010 – “either didn’t know [about the allegations] – which I find very difficult to accept – or refused to acknowledge that there was this background of sexual misconduct”.

Mr Armstrong also said his team had 37 clients, but that the number of people who had contacted them with claims about Fayed was approaching 150.

Lawyers allege Fayed’s assaults occurred around the world – including in the UK, US, Canada, France, Malaysia and Dubai.

“It’s very much a global case, it’s not just the UK. It happened all over the world,” another lawyer, Bruce Drummond, told the BBC.

Advertisement
iPlayer graphic
iPlayer graphic
Sounds graphic
Sounds graphic

Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Business

Vaccine alliance struggles for funds as donors face financial pressures

Published

on

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

The international alliance to send life-saving vaccines to poorer countries has never had a wider range of jabs at its disposal but is battling funding constraints among its rich nation donors, its chief executive has warned.

Financial demands on Gavi’s main funders, from reviving sluggish economies to conflicts and climate change, was leading them to explore greater use of “vaccine bonds” to spread payments over multiple years, Sania Nishtar said.

Advertisement

Nishtar’s comments highlight a wider global public health dilemma ahead of talks at the UN General Assembly next week, as money pressures threaten to hamper delivery of vital supplies to countries most in need. Gavi’s work extends from inoculations for common diseases to responses to emergencies such as the mpox epidemic centred on the Democratic Republic of Congo.

“Now we have the widest portfolio of vaccines available to us,” Nishtar said in an interview. “The irony is that this is also a time when the donors are fiscally constrained and there are many other competing priorities.”

Gavi has raised about $2.4bn of the $9bn minimum it is seeking from donors for its next five-year funding cycle starting in 2026, said Nishtar, who took office earlier this year. She was “cautiously optimistic” about hitting the target but conscious of the “difficult environment” financially, which is why Gavi is suggesting countries make greater use of an existing alternative funding mechanism.

It has pitched to prospective donors in western and Gulf countries to give as much as two-thirds of their funding in some cases via vaccine bonds, which are backed by legally binding sovereign commitments. These allow Gavi to raise money on international markets to fund routine immunisation programmes or respond quickly to crises such as the Covid-19 pandemic.

Advertisement

“It’s a time-tested model. And we hope to be increasing its share in our replenishment,” said Nishtar, a Pakistani cardiologist and public health expert who has served as a senator and government minister.

Sania Nishtar
Gavi chief executive Sania Nishtar: ‘Now we have the widest portfolio of vaccines available to us. The irony is that this is also a time when the donors are fiscally constrained and there are many other competing priorities’ © Noam Galai/Getty Images
A security agent talks with a worker as he prepares to transport mpox vaccines as first batches arrive at N’Djili International Airport in Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo
Mpox vaccines arrive at the N’djili airport in the Democratic Republic of Congo © Justin Makangara/Reuters

The reports of funding pressures echo remarks by other prominent figures on global public health, who point to spending commitments such as supporting Ukraine against Russia’s full-scale invasion. Bill Gates, the Microsoft founder and philanthropist, has warned that a reluctance among rich countries to donate threatened advances in child health.

Gavi has helped countries with the routine immunisation of more than 1bn children since it was established in 2000, as well as co-ordinating vaccines for other campaigns and crises such as Covid. The jabs target a range of threats, including measles, meningitis A and the human papillomavirus that causes cervical cancer.

Gavi strived to avoid “a paternalistic relationship with countries of the south”, Nishtar said. Its co-financing policy means nations contribute some of the costs of vaccine procurement, while 19 have already shifted to fully funding their immunisation programmes including Angola, India and Moldova. Donors liked the model and felt it gave them value for money as well as improving public health, she said.

“Here is something that gives them results in human terms — and in economic terms gives them value for money.”

Advertisement

Gavi has set up a rapid response fund for health emergencies after the Covid pandemic showed the damage caused by inequities in vaccine supply. It used this facility this week to secure 500,000 mpox jab doses for delivery this year.

Gavi has also set up a $1.2bn financing instrument to promote vaccine manufacturing in Africa by making incentive payments to help offset high initial production costs. Nishtar said she was also pushing for greater use of mobile payments for health workers and artificial intelligence-based analysis to detect “difficult pockets” of countries where children remained under-immunised.

“[A] big picture change is the focus on underprivileged communities, but bringing all modern levers at play to deliver,” she said.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

News

Explosion at Iran coal mine kills at least 51 people

Published

on

Explosion at Iran coal mine kills at least 51 people

An explosion caused by a gas leak at a coal mine in eastern Iran has killed at least 51 people, state media said on Sunday.

More than 20 others were injured after the blast in South Khorasan province.

It is reported to have been caused by a methane gas explosion in two blocks of the mine in Tabas, 540 km (335 miles) southeast of the capital Tehran.

The explosion occurred at 21:00 local time (17:30 GMT) on Saturday, state media said.

Advertisement

South Khorasan’s governor Javad Ghenaatzadeh said there were 69 workers in the blocks at the time of the explosion.

According to the AP news agency, he said: “There was an explosion and unfortunately 69 people were working in the B and C blocks of Madanjoo mine.

“In block C there were 22 people and in block B there were 47 people.”

It remains unclear how many people are still alive and trapped inside the mine.

Advertisement

State media has now revised its earlier toll of 30 dead.

“The number of dead workers increased to 51 and the number of injured increased to 20,” the official IRNA news agency reported.

Citing the head of Iran’s Red Crescent, state TV said earlier on Sunday that 24 people were missing.

According to Reuters news agency, Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian expressed condolences to the victims’ families.

Advertisement

“I spoke with ministers and we will do our best to follow up,” Pezeshkian said in televised comments.

The Tabas mine covers an area of more than 30,000 square kilometres (nearly 11,600 square miles) and holds mass reserves of coking and thermal coal, according to IRNA.

It is “considered the richest and largest coal area in Iran,” IRNA said.

Local prosecutor Ali Nesaei was quoted by state media as saying “gas accumulation in the mine” has made search operations difficult.

Advertisement

“Currently, the priority is to provide aid to the injured and pull people from under the rubble,” Nesaei said.

He added that “the negligence and fault of the relevant agents will be dealt with” at a later date.

Last year, an explosion at a coal mine in the northern city of Damghan killed six people, also likely the result of methane leak according to local media.

In May 2021, two miners died in a collapse at the same site, local media reported at the time.

Advertisement

A blast in 2017 killed 43 miners in Azad Shahr city in northern Iran, triggering anger towards Iranian authorities.

Source link

Continue Reading

News

Angela Rayner insists ALL MPs take freebies as she’s grilled on BBC – and says people should stop ‘demonising’ Sue Gray

Published

on

Angela Rayner insists ALL MPs take freebies as she's grilled on BBC - and says people should stop 'demonising' Sue Gray

ANGELA Rayner was left squirming over Labour’s freebie row today – insisting that all MPs accept goodies from donors. 

The Deputy PM said receiving gifts and hospitality has been a “feature of our politics for a very long time” as she took a battering over the saga.

Angela Rayner claimed this morning that all MPs accept freebies

2

Angela Rayner claimed this morning that all MPs accept freebiesCredit: AFP
Ms Rayner is grilled on the BBC at the Labour conference

2

Advertisement
Ms Rayner is grilled on the BBC at the Labour conferenceCredit: PA

She also tried to defuse growing concerns about Sir Keir Starmer’s chief of staff Sue Gray, who she claimed was being “demonised” as part of a smear campaign.

The start of Labour’s party conference in Liverpool has been overshadowed by storms over Cabinet Ministers’ haul of freebies, as well as hostile briefings against Ms Gray.

In a grilling on the BBC, Ms Rayner defended the fledgling administration from the sleaze claims that have engulfed Downing Street within the first few months.

She said: “I get that people are frustrated, in particular the circumstances that we’re in, but donations for gifts and hospitality and monetary donations have been a feature of our politics for a very long time.

Advertisement

“People can look it up and see what people have had donations for, and the transparency is really important. I get that people are angry, I get that people are upset.”

Sir Keir and his wife Lady Victoria have accepted thousands of pounds worth of glasses and garments from multi-millionaire peer Lord Alli. 

Ms Rayner and Chancellor Rachel Reeves have also taken donations for clothes. All four have since vowed never to accept such gifts again following the backlash.

Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson today also insisted that her 40th birthday bash – paid for by Lord Alli – was held in a “work context”.

Advertisement

The Deputy PM was today also forced to deny she breached Commons rules by staying in a $2.5million luxury New York apartment owned by Lord Alli.

By Ryan Sabey, Deputy Political Editor

LABOUR were meant to be popping champagne corks this week at their annual rally in Liverpool.

Sir Keir Starmer has found himself in the mire over freebies scandals and controversy over his top aide Sue Gray.

Advertisement

This morning Labour chiefs sent out Angela Rayner to try and defend their position.

Judging by her 20-odd minute interview with the BBC’s Laura Kuenssberg, there’s a lot more work needed to defuse this row.

She denied she broke any rules by staying in Labour donor Lord Alli’s New York flat as she declared it.

The deputy Prime Minister even went as far as saying she had been “overly transparent”.

Advertisement

Education Secretary even explained away that she had two events to mark her 40th birthday party paid for by Lord Alli.

But the point has been missed.

There is anger over politicians claiming freebies which is beyond the grasp of ordinary voters.

Sir Keir talked a lot about Labour being at the service of working people.
The actions at the moment don’t appear to be matching the words

Advertisement

Ms Rayner declared on the parliamentary register of interests that she was lent the home for a personal holiday between December 29 and January 2 last year. 

But she didn’t disclose that her on-again-off-again boyfriend Sam Tarry, a former Labour MP, also joined her on the deluxe trip.

She insisted that the ex-MP was not part of her holiday but just happened to be in New York at the same time and so they met up. 

Ms Rayner told the BBC: “It was a personal holiday and I think I followed the rules. In fact I went above that and I wanted to do that to be transparent about the connection I had in the use of that apartment.”

Advertisement

The Deputy PM added: “I don’t believe I broke any rules. I had the use of the apartment and I disclosed that I had the use of that apartment.

“If anything I was overly transparent because I thought it was important that despite it being a personal holiday, because that person as a friend had already donated to me in the past for my deputy leadership.”

Ms Rayner rejected reports Sir Keir’s chief of staff Ms Gray is sowing division at the heart of No10.

She defended the former partygate enforcer, insisting she is being “demonised” through the press.

Advertisement

Asked if she will still be in place by Christmas, Ms Rayner replied: “I think so, absolutely.”

She went on: “She has been doing an incredible job, and she’s got a huge amount of respect amongst the Cabinet. 

“It angers me as someone who has been a trade union rep in the past and who wants to bring workers’ rights that somehow it’s okay to, you know, demonise workers in their workplace through the press and the media.”

Disclosures that Ms Gray was given a pay rise after the election, while other political advisers faced salary cuts, have sparked a row within Government.

Advertisement

The BBC last week reported Ms Gray was paid about £3,000 more than the PM’s salary of £166,786.

That is more than any Cabinet Minister is paid, while many of Labour’s newly recruited special advisers have joined a union over concerns about their pay.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Business

Israel bombs Lebanon as Hizbollah rockets hit Haifa suburbs

Published

on

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

Israel and Hizbollah ratcheted up their exchanges of fire on Sunday, with Israeli jets mounting some of the heaviest bombing raids in Lebanon since the start of the fighting last year, and the militant group firing rockets towards the city of Haifa.

The salvos capped a week of spiralling cross-border tensions that have fuelled fears that the hostilities between Israel and the Lebanese militant group could be on the verge of erupting into a full-blown war.

Advertisement

The Israeli military said Hizbollah had launched about 115 projectiles early on Sunday, with rockets aimed deeper into Israel than in previous salvos. While most were intercepted, Kiryat Bialik and Tsur Shalom in Haifa’s suburbs, and other areas in the country’s north, sustained hits.

Hizbollah said the barrages were in retaliation for “repeated” Israeli attacks, as well as an “initial” response to mass detonations of its communications devices earlier this week that killed 37 people and injured more than 3,000 in multiple locations across Lebanon.

Hizbollah has blamed the explosions on Israel, which has not directly commented.

Israeli paramedics said they had treated several people for shrapnel injuries from Hizbollah’s barrage, but there were no immediate reports of casualties.

Advertisement

But in a sign that Israel was bracing for a further escalation, authorities limited gatherings in the north of the country. They also told schools to close and hospitals to operate from facilities with protection against rocket fire.

As tensions boiled across the region, Israel said it had shot down a drone fired from the east — which was claimed by militants in Iraq who said they had also targeted Israel with cruise missiles — and launched a raid in the Palestinian city of Ramallah to close down the local Al Jazeera office. Israel has accused the media group of being a mouthpiece for militants. Al Jazeera has rejected the claims.

Nadav Shoshani, a spokesman for Israel’s military, accused Hizbollah of “targeting civilians” in its latest round of strikes, and the military said it would continue to strike to degrade the Lebanese group’s capabilities.

The Israeli military earlier on Sunday said it had hit about 290 targets in Lebanon in the preceding 24 hours, destroying thousands of rocket launcher barrels and other infrastructure belonging to Hizbollah.

Advertisement

Hizbollah and Israeli forces have been exchanging cross-border fire since the Iran-backed militant group launched rockets at Israel the day after Hamas’s October 7 attack on the Jewish state.

But in the last week, the hostilities have escalated dramatically. On Tuesday and Wednesday, the attack on Hizbollah’s pagers and other communications devices sent shockwaves through Lebanon.

Then, on Friday, an Israeli strike in Beirut killed Ibrahim Aqil and other senior commanders in Hizbollah’s elite Radwan force, in arguably the most damaging blow Israel has struck against the militant group since it was founded in the 1980s.

Advertisement

Lebanese authorities said on Sunday that the death toll from the strike, which destroyed a residential building in the Beirut suburb of Dahiyeh, had risen to 45, including at least 10 civilians, among them three children.

This week’s escalation came after Israel said it was entering a “new phase” of its almost year-long conflict with Hizbollah, which has until now been largely contained to the Israeli-Lebanese border region.

Jeanine Hennis, the UN’s special co-ordinator for Lebanon, warned that the exchanges had brought the region to “the brink of an imminent catastrophe”, and called for both sides to de-escalate.

“It cannot be overstated enough: there is NO military solution that will make either side safer,” she wrote on X.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

News

Yorkshire mum says Brexit has made it impossible to study abroad

Published

on

Yorkshire mum says Brexit has made it impossible to study abroad


Fay Bird says daughter Niamh Francis-King is still awaiting a visa despite being due to start studying in one week

Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Amazon and UK government at odds over working from home

Published

on

Amazon and UK government at odds over working from home
BBC Montage Image: On the left side a man works from home at his desk, and pets a dog. On the right side a woman stands at her desk in an office environment, and passes a file through to the man working from home. A cat crosses the divide between the two images.BBC

They are two competing views on where desk-based employees work best.

Amazon is ordering its staff back to the office five days a week, just as the government is pushing for rights to flexible working – including working from home – to be strengthened.

The tech giant says employees will be able to better “invent, collaborate, and be connected”.

But just as the firm’s announcement became news, the UK government was linking flexibility to better performance and a more productive, loyal workforce.

Few are short of an opinion on how effective working from home is and for a government there are broader considerations such as how, for example, caring responsibilities are affected.

Advertisement

But more than four years since the start of the pandemic, what does the evidence tell us about how we work best and is Amazon right to believe people being in the office full time will allow them to collaborate better?

Amazon’s fellow tech giant Microsoft studied its employees during the pandemic. It looked at the emails, calendars, instant messages and calls of 61,000 of its employees in the US during the first six months of 2020. The findings were published in Nature Human Behaviour.

The study indicated that, during Covid, remote workers tended to collaborate more with networks of colleagues they already had, and that they built fewer “bridges” between different networks.

There was also a drop in communication that happened in real time – meetings that would have happened in real life weren’t necessarily happening online. Instead, more emails and instant messages were sent.

Advertisement

The authors suggested this may make it harder to convey and understand complex information.

Line chart showing the percentage of people aged 16 and over in Great Britain who said they had worked from home only, away from home only, or a mixture of both in the last week. In the year to September 2024, an average of 42% said they only travelled to work, 13% said they only worked from home, while 27% said they adopted a hybrid approach. The percentage reporting a hybrid working pattern has risen since 2021, while the percentage only working from home has dropped.

Amazon is among a number of companies telling employees to return to the office full-time

Microsoft’s was a data-led study. But what about human experience?

A 2020 survey by the Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development (CIPD) of 1,000 senior decision-makers in organisations found about a third struggled with “reduced staff interaction and cooperation”.

However, more than 40% of the managers said there was more collaboration when people were working from home.

Advertisement

Greater collaboration is hard to object to, but equally it is no guarantee of productivity.

In 2010, China’s biggest travel agency CTrip tried something very new among staff in its airfare and hotel booking department.

Almost 250 staff were identified as potential home workers – they needed to be established at the company and have a proper home working set-up.

Around half that group started working from home. The other group stayed office-based.

Advertisement

Researchers at Stanford University found the workers were 13% more productive when working from home – mainly because workers had fewer breaks and sick days, and they could take more calls because it was quieter.

Communication barriers

There was a particularly significant drop in staff quitting for non-managers, women, and people with long commutes, the researchers said.

However, those Chinese home-workers were seeing a bit of the office: they were spending one day a week among colleagues. It could be this brought some benefit – a separate study years later from researchers at Stanford suggested fully remote work can lead to a 10% drop in productivity compared with working in the office all the time.

Advertisement

Barriers to communication, lack of mentoring for staff, problems building a work culture, and difficulties with self-motivation were all cited.

Amazon is not alone in telling employees to return to the office full-time.

Goldman Sachs chief executive David Solomon famously described working from home as an “aberration”. The US firm requires bankers to be in the office five days per week.

Rival US banks JPMorgan and Morgan Stanley have also backed workers returning to the office, whereas some banks in Europe have taken a softer approach.

Advertisement

Elon Musk’s Tesla also requires employees to be in the office full time, leading to reports of problems finding space for them.

Another Musk company, SpaceX, brought in a policy requiring workers to return to the office full-time.

But it wasn’t without consequences: when it brought the policy in, SpaceX lost 15% of its senior-level employees, according to a study published earlier this year.

The pandemic changed work routines that were in many cases decades old.

Advertisement

Linda Noble, now 62, from Barnsley, was used to putting on a suit and make-up. In 2020 she was a senior officer in local government, scrutinising governance in the fire service and the police service.

Then Covid struck and she was working from home.

“I loathed it. I missed the communication – going into work, someone would make you smile,” she says.

But with time, Ms Noble adjusted. She set up her home office and she thinks that before long she was twice as productive as previously – even if that was in part because of an inability to switch off.

Advertisement

Many disabled people also believe working from home makes them more productive.

A 2023 study of 400 people suggested that disabled workers felt they had more autonomy and control when working from home, which led them to better manage their health and wellbeing, and 85% felt more productive.

Perhaps unsurprisingly, not all studies come to the same conclusions. Some suggest an improvement to physical health from working at home, others disagree. The same goes for mental health.

The wellbeing of staff was a key reason one UK business decided to get them back to the office as soon as possible after lockdown restrictions ended, according to one of its directors, Francis Ashcroft.

Advertisement

Part of a team

He was chief executive of a large private UK children’s care services company. He says “some people were struggling with raised anxiety” and wanted to get back to the office “to be part of a team”.

Mr Ashcroft said there was “also a recognition that 80% of staff were at the coalface”, working in person in children’s homes and education, and so it was “right to come back” for reasons of fairness.

Although team members were collaborating online at 95% of what they had been, “coming back into the office added that 5% back”, he argues.

Advertisement

“It brought a realness and a sense of belonging,” Mr Ashcroft says, adding that “when it comes to delivering a service, the teamwork was much better in the office”.

Despite this experience, an umbrella review of home working that examined a range of other studies concluded that, on the whole, working from home boosts how much workers can get done.

What difference there is in approach between the government and Amazon essentially boils down to whether or not some home working should be part of the mix, with Amazon believing it shouldn’t.

Linda Noble’s time solely working from home is over. She is just about to start a hybrid job. She’s attracted by the “balance” between working from home and office work.

Advertisement

Reduce churn

According to the CIPD, benefits of hybrid working include “a better work/life balance, greater ability to focus with fewer distractions, more time for family and friends and wellbeing activity, saved commuting time and costs, plus higher levels of motivation and engagement.”

And it may be that this can reduce staff churn. A study published this year found that a Chinese firm that adopted hybrid working reduced the rate at which employees quit by a third.

From an employee perspective, the optimum time for hybrid working is three days in the office – this makes employees most engaged, according to a Gallup survey of US workers, although it also says there is “no one-size-fits-all”.

Advertisement

In the UK, the number of people exclusively working from home is falling. But, crucially, hybrid working is continuing to rise, running at 27% of the working population.

Gallup says that despite highly publicised moves by firms to get employees back in the office, the underlying trend is that the future of office work is hybrid.

This tallies with the position of the UK government, which is clear that it believes the potential to work at home drives up productivity.

The calculation by Amazon appears to be that what evidence there is for increased productivity among employees who work in part from home fails to capture the particulars of how they operate.

Advertisement

BBC InDepth is the new home on the website and app for the best analysis and expertise from our top journalists. Under a distinctive new brand, we’ll bring you fresh perspectives that challenge assumptions, and deep reporting on the biggest issues to help you make sense of a complex world. And we’ll be showcasing thought-provoking content from across BBC Sounds and iPlayer too. We’re starting small but thinking big, and we want to know what you think – you can send us your feedback by clicking on the button below.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2017 Zox News Theme. Theme by MVP Themes, powered by WordPress.