Connect with us

News

Death of Hezbollah’s Nasrallah Brings New Chance for Peace

Published

on

Death of Hezbollah's Nasrallah Brings New Chance for Peace

Just when the prospect of peace in the Middle East seemed further away than ever, the dramatic death of longtime Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah significantly alters the balance of power and offers a renewed opportunity for peace.

It is hard to overstate the significance of removing Nasrallah from the scene. He was a singular leader possessing a unique portfolio of charisma and strategic skills—in the words of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, “He was not another terrorist, he was the terrorist.” His impact is a reminder that in an era where self-directed work teams, group leadership, and collective action are all the buzz, significant individuals can still have a profound impact on history. Scottish historian Thomas Carlyle said: “The history of the world is but the biography of great men.” It’s clear that by “great,” that would mean both virtuous and wicked.

When Nasrallah assumed leadership of Hezbollah in 1992, at age 32, taking over from assassinated co-founder Abbas al-Musawi, Hezbollah was still largely relegated to the fringes of Lebanese society. Over the next thirty years, Nasrallah and his acolytes systemically dismantled and subsumed the sovereign Lebanese government, with even no President since 2022, and wrought havoc on the Lebanese people with little support from the population. As noted by President Biden in calling Nasrallah’s death “a measure of justice,” Nasrallah was responsible for the deaths of thousands of Lebanese, Israelis, Americans, and Syrians during his bloody rule, and enjoyed little support from Arab neighbors, with the Arab League joining the U.S. and the E.U. in designating Hezbollah a terrorist organization under his watch.

Under Hezbollah rule, Lebanon has arguably turned from prosperity into a failed state, but with Nasrallah and much of the leadership of Hezbollah now gone, there is an opportunity for what is left of the Lebanese government and military to reassert control and rebuild a functioning state, for the benefit of the people of Lebanon rather than Iran.

Advertisement

But the broader opportunity comes from what has accompanied Nasrallah’s death—the systematic degradation of Hezbollah’s capabilities over the last month.

Recent history shows that criminal and terrorist movements rarely collapse with the removal of the top leader alone. The resurgence of Boko Haram has continued despite the killing of its leader Abubakar Shekau in 2021. Similarly, the resilience of Al-Shabaab after the U.S. killed one of its top commanders Maalim Ayman last year, and the flourishing of Mexico’s Sinaloa Cartel despite the imprisonment of leader El Chapo and his son, show that taking down one key figure does not always have a grave impact.

But what is far more effective is when the top leader’s removal is paired with the systemic hollowing out of a movement’s organizational capacity. Examples include the collapse of Al-Qaeda, culminating in the deaths of heads Osama bin Laden and Ayman al-Zawahiri, the collapse of Russia’s Wagner Group after its forced integration with the Russian military culminating in the deaths of head Yevgeny Prigozhin and his top deputies, and the collapse of ISIS after years of military defeats culminating in the death of its already weakened leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi.

And that is what has happened in Lebanon over the last month. Hezbollah pagers and walkie-talkies exploded, making communications among Hezbollah operatives suspect. Strikes have eliminated Nasrallah’s presumptive heirs and leadership cohort, and with Hezbollah fighters focused on their own survival, they have been less capable of launching their missiles at Israel in numbers we were seeing previously. Israel has been under attack from what they estimate to be anywhere from 8,000 to 11,000 missiles fired by Hezbollah since Oct. 8, 2023.

Advertisement

The sudden, unanticipated degradation of Hezbollah has shattered tired, old assumptions that Iran’s most vaunted proxy was untouchable, catching the U.S.—and many others—by surprise, right as the global community was calling for a cease-fire. But even more importantly, it has exposed Iran and its proxies as paper tigers, tilting the regional power balance the furthest away from Iran and its allies in recent memory. One thing that is for sure: You can bet that Arab leaders will now be less fearful of Iran and its coercive abilities and will evaluate their options accordingly.

Of course, escalation remains possible, but Iran has always been wary of getting into a direct war with the U.S. Consider the reaction of Iran to the killing of Quds Force Commander Qassem Soleimani in 2020 and the strike on Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh in Tehran earlier this year. The former produced a very limited retaliatory response, the latter still nothing. Deprived of its strongest proxy, the dramatically overestimated Hezbollah, Iran’s bluff has been called. Iran is left in deeper isolation in the Middle East, leaving the Ayatollah’s regime increasingly reliant on patronage from Russia and China. Iran’s pursuit of nuclear weapons remains a danger that requires Iran’s leaders to understand that they could risk its entire nuclear infrastructure if it continues. But the Iranian economy remains very weak and is being propped up by windfall oil production.

What does all this mean for the prospect of regional peace? Netanyahu needs to be able to translate Israel’s military achievements into political outcomes. He cannot let nationalists in his coalition define what is possible in Gaza and the West Bank. But now, given Israel’s actions against Hezbollah, Iran-backed proxy groups will no doubt be worrying about their own security, or lack thereof, with the myth of Iran’s protective shield irrevocably punctured. Israeli security insistences which may have previously seemed indigestible may not be as intolerable when measured against the humiliation inflicted upon Hezbollah, and by extension, Iran.

The last few years have been marked by roads to peace not taken, and while the opportunity for peace looms large, whether that opportunity is realized will largely come down to the regional participants themselves. After so many missed opportunities, it is hard to be hopeful. However, even without any official accord, the removal of Hezbollah’s Nasrallah, paired with the complete degradation of Hezbollah, promises a new day ahead for the Middle East.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

News

Terrifying moment smoke billows from burning chemical lab as massive fire sparks evacuations

Published

on

Terrifying moment smoke billows from burning chemical lab as massive fire sparks evacuations

THIS is the terrifying moment smoke billows from a burning chemical lab as a massive fire has sparked evacuations.

Footage shows a huge plume of multi-coloured smoke gushing into the air as the fire in Conyers, Georgia, ripped through the building.

Smoke erupted from the blaze as the chemicals burned

4

Smoke erupted from the blaze as the chemicals burnedCredit: Facebook
The chemical plant burned in Conyers, Georgia

4

Advertisement
The chemical plant burned in Conyers, GeorgiaCredit: Twitter
Evacuations and stay in place orders have been introduced

4

Evacuations and stay in place orders have been introducedCredit: Rockdale Government

Thousands of people have been evacuated and others given a shelter in place order as hazardous smoke drifts through the air.

The site, run by BioLab, is about 30 miles east of Atlanta and manufactures swimming pool and spa treatment products – including using chlorine, according to CNN.

Those chemicals have now been burning for hours with the fire still going 12 hours after it began.

Advertisement

The blaze started at around 5am EST when a sprinkler at the facility malfunctioned and sprayed water on a chemical that sparked an explosion, Atlanta News First reported.

Hazmat crews and other emergency services have respond to a the fire with the nearby highway also blocked off.

Rockdale County Sheriff, Eric Levett, said: “I want to strongly ask all of you to please spread the word to stay away from this area at this point.

“It’s burning pretty good. We’re trying to get that under control, but at the same time we’re also trying to get the traffic under control.”

Advertisement

The southwest wind is blowing the smoke across to Walton County.

Walton County Emergency Management director, Carl Morrow, has shared an alert for the county residents.

The alert stated: “Walton County EMA is aware of what is happening in our neighboring county of Rockdale.

Shocking moment 470mph fighter jet plummets into the ground and erupts in fireball killing two top gun pilots

“We are monitoring the situation and advise that if you smell a chlorine odour you should turn off your air conditioners, turn on your ceiling fans and if possible bring your outside animals indoors.”

Advertisement

A BioLab statement said: “Our employees are accounted for with no injuries reported. Our team is on the scene, working with first responders and local authorities to assess and contain the situation.”

“As always, the safety of our community remains our top priority.”

Conyers Mayor Vince Evans urged residents who choose not to evacuate to stay in place and not wander or drive around the city.

He said: “This is not the time to do any type of sightseeing. We are strongly encouraging everyone, no matter where you’re coming from, but especially Rockdale residents, to stay out of this area.”

Advertisement

Residents between Sigman Road and Interstate 20 have been asked to evacuate.

In September 2020, BioLab experienced a “thermal decomposition event” that also led to a fire that temporarily closed Interstate 20.

The smoke could be hazardous as chemicals are burning

4

The smoke could be hazardous as chemicals are burningCredit: Rockdale Government

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Business

Sudan becoming ‘fertile ground’ for jihadis, says ex-prime minister

Published

on

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

Sudan’s last civilian prime minister warned that the country’s brutal civil war risks turning it into “fertile ground” for the spread of regional terrorism at a time when several African countries are struggling with an onslaught of jihadist violence.

Some 150,000 people have been killed and 10mn pushed out of their homes since military president General Abdel Fattah al-Burhan and his former deputy and paramilitary leader Mohamed Hamdan Dagalo, known as Hemeti, went to war last year. About half of Sudan’s population of 49mn is now on the verge of famine.

Advertisement

Abdalla Hamdok, prime minister between 2019 and 2022 who now leads the Taqaddum — Progress — coalition of democratic forces, said Sudan’s descent into violence risks bolstering jihadis across the region.

“I really feel quite frightened about this,” he told the Financial Times. “With Sudan bordering seven countries, it will become fertile ground for terrorism in a region that is very fragile.”

The Sahel, the semi-arid strip of land below the Sahara that is home to some 400mn people, has become a haven for jihadis. They range from Boko Haram in Nigeria, Cameroon and Chad to Isis, which is most active in the border area between Burkina Faso, Mali and Niger.

Hamdok fears the descent into violence in Sudan, which hosted Osama bin Laden in the 1990s, could also connect groups allied to al-Qaeda in the Sahel to jihadis such as Somalia’s al-Shabaab in the Horn of Africa, which is linked to Yemeni Houthis.

Advertisement

Analysts and officials in neighbouring countries have echoed Hamdok’s concerns. The country was long on the US’s list of state sponsors of terrorism before it was removed under Hamdok in 2020.

Sudan’s war has already attracted a complex web of external actors. The United Arab Emirates is accused of backing Hemeti, claims Abu Dhabi denies, while Iran and Russia support Burhan. Mercenaries from Chad and pilots from Ukraine have also entered the fray.

Smoke billows during air strikes in central Khartoum
Some 150,000 people have been killed and 10mn pushed out of their homes since military president General Abdel Fattah al-Burhan and his former deputy and paramilitary leader Mohamed Hamdan Dagalo, known as Hemeti, went to war last year © Almigdad Hassan/AFP/Getty Images

Burhan’s army this week launched a major assault to retake the capital city, Khartoum, from Hemeti’s Rapid Support Forces, which captured most of it last year.

Negotiations for a ceasefire to stop the fighting began in Geneva last month, led by the US and brokered by a range of countries — including Egypt, Switzerland, Saudi Arabia and the UAE — but without direct contact between warring parties.

Hamdok and members of Taqaddum criticised the process, saying that while it could help “put more pressure” on the warring parties there could not be a “sustainable” solution without including civilian politicians.

Advertisement

“There is a tendency to try to get a quick fix, to just bring in the belligerents. The fact is that all attempts have failed,” said Khaled Omar Youssef, a senior member of the Sudanese Congress party, which is part of Taqaddum, referring to previous unsuccessful talks in Saudi Arabia and Bahrain.

A western official involved said the focus of the Geneva negotiation was “to open up humanitarian access and ensure protection of civilians as well as trying to get ceasefires”. The official said “efforts to transition to the civilian government is outside of the realm” of the current talks.

A critical challenge for civilians is to unite Sudan’s array of political forces amid differences among groups who have competing views on how its political future should unfold. Many Sudanese see Taqaddum as aligned with Hemeti, something Hamdok labels as “propaganda” spread by the army.

Among other things, there is a sharp divide between those pressing for a purely civilian government and those who advocate power-sharing with the military. Sudan has suffered some 17 coups and a string of civil wars — including one that led to the creation of South Sudan — since independence from Britain and Egypt in 1956.

Hamdok took charge in 2019 following the ousting of longtime dictator Omar al-Bashir in a putative transition government backed by Burhan and Hemeti. He was ousted in a coup in 2021 before being briefly reinstated.

“The only formula that would keep this country together is a government led by civilians,” said Hamdok. “The military has messed up the country for over 50 years. They cannot be entrusted with the future of the country.”

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Travel

RR Ranthambore: luxury SUV, limited to 12

Published

on

RR Ranthambore: luxury SUV, limited to 12

As a nod to conservation, Range Rover will donate a portion of the proceeds from each sale to the Wildlife Conservation Trust of India.

Continue reading RR Ranthambore: luxury SUV, limited to 12 at Business Traveller.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Russian MiG-31s Possibly Strike Ukrainian Airbase Hosting F-16s

Published

on

Russian MiG-31s Possibly Strike Ukrainian Airbase Hosting F-16s

Confirmed Strike of Military Targets

Top War, another Russian military outlet, claimed that the attack triggered widespread air raid alerts across Ukraine, including the capital, Kyiv.

There were also reports of explosions at the Starokostiantiniv airbase and in Khmelnytskyi, as well as in Kyiv. The Ukrainian Air Force later confirmed that Russian missiles, including hypersonic weapons, had struck various military targets in Ukraine, though they did not confirm any damage to the F-16s.

Some reports, including from Military Watch, suggested that four of the F-16 jets at the airbase may have been destroyed in the strike, but these claims remain unverified.

Despite the ongoing attacks, Ukrainian forces have continued to fortify their air defenses in response to Russia’s advanced missile capabilities.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Fossil fuel projects face higher bar in UK as legal challenges mount

Published

on

In an unforgiving stretch of the North Sea roughly 250km east of Aberdeen, Shell’s engineers have been drilling since last September to develop the vast Jackdaw gasfield, aiming to produce its first gas in 2026.   

Yet in less than two months, lawyers for the FTSE 100 company will head to a courtroom in Edinburgh to try to defend the project from climate campaigners who want it shut down, after a judge ruled last week the case could proceed.  

The legal challenge brought by Greenpeace will be the first involving an offshore oil and gas project to be heard in the wake of a landmark Supreme Court ruling in June that has emboldened activists and tightened the squeeze on fossil fuel projects.

The so-called Finch ruling, named after the activist and writer Sarah Finch who helped bring the case, means that planning officials considering allowing big developers to drill for fossil fuels need to factor in the emissions spewed out when the product is used by consumers. 

Advertisement

It raises further questions for the UK’s oil and gas industry in the North Sea as the Labour government tries to ultimately wind down fossil fuels in favour of renewable energy, and position Britain as a global leader in tackling climate change. 

There is also a push for planning officials to take into greater account climate goals when deciding whether to approve other projects beyond fossil fuels.

“One by one, spurious lines of defence are being knocked back,” said Niall Toru, senior lawyer at Friends of the Earth. “Developers have to own the climate impacts of their projects.”

The Finch ruling, a three-to-two majority judgment led by Lord Justice George Leggatt, quashed planning permission for onshore oil drilling in Horse Hill, Surrey. Two further projects have already been stymied in its wake. 

Permission for onshore oil drilling in Biscathorpe, Lincolnshire, was knocked back by High Court judges in July, while in September they also quashed permission for a mine in Whitehaven, north-west England, to supply coal to steel mills. 

The challenge to be heard in November against Shell’s Jackdaw gasfield will be the next test of the Finch ruling’s implications, as will a separate challenge brought by campaigners Greenpeace and Uplift to Equinor’s giant Rosebank oilfield in the North Sea. If the companies lose, they would need to decide whether to reapply for development consent or walk away. The government is not defending the cases.

Meanwhile, there are 14 UK oil and gas projects with drilling licences from the government that are at various stages of seeking development consent from the oil and gas regulator, and are now affected by the Finch ruling.

The judgment specifically covers fossil fuel projects, given the clear line between production and consumer emissions. But it is “not impossible” to imagine the ruling being cited in other carbon-intensive projects, noted Steven Wilson, senior associate at Vinson and Elkins. Airport expansions are an obvious target for climate campaigners. 

Advertisement

“I think it will be fascinating to see how this will be applied in other types of projects,” said Matthew McFeeley, partner at Richard Buxton Solicitors, which represented South Lakes Action on Climate Change in its challenge to the Whitehaven coal mine. “It’s the million-dollar question.”

Approvals for oil and gas projects are not out of the question, however. The Finch ruling does not prevent authorities from approving projects, as long as they have considered their impact. The law does not specify what level of emissions is acceptable.

“That’s a hard question that will need to be taken case by case,” said Robert Meade, partner at Bracewell. “These [legal rulings] are about the procedure.” 

At Edinburgh’s Court of Session in November, Shell’s lawyers will argue the energy security benefits of its Jackdaw project. It was approved at the height of the energy crisis in 2022, when gas prices soared in the wake of Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine. 

Advertisement

To help clarify what officials should do, the UK government said last month it would develop new environmental guidance for oil and gas projects. It is expected to set tough standards, given its approach towards the sector so far.

Planning policy beyond oil and gas projects is also evolving. The government is continuing to explore potential changes proposed by its Conservative predecessor to the national planning policy framework, which covers planning in England. Ideas include a “carbon impact assessment”, although a consultation raised doubts over the proposal.

In the meantime, the legal cases are likely to further undermine oil and gas drillers’ confidence in the UK following Labour’s decision to increase taxes on the sector and reduce investment allowances. It also plans to stop issuing licences for new exploration.  

Advertisement

“You’ll get to the stage where investors would be doing a disservice to their shareholders if they were to allocate capital here,” warned one industry figure. Oil and gas still supplies 75 per cent of the UK’s total energy demand, but domestic production has been dwindling as the basin ages.

Climate campaigners, on the other hand, sense the growing opportunity for legal victories. “We are always looking [at potential legal cases],” adds Toru, at Friends of the Earth. “I wouldn’t rule anything out.”

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Life after Top Gear doesn’t look good

Published

on

Life after Top Gear doesn't look good

Is there life after Top Gear for its presenters? Freddie Flintoff, whose life-changing accident led to the BBC’s flagship car show being “rested for the foreseeable future”, proved that there was with his brilliant and moving sequel to Freddie Flintoff’s Field of Dreams. Alas, no such luck with co-presenters Paddy McGuinness and Chris Harris’s new BBC project, Paddy and Chris: Road Tripping.

If the title of their new series suggested something like the original Top Gear trio’s other programme, The Grand Tour, then car fans will have been bitterly disappointed. This was a road trip alright, but with little interest in cars as McGuinness and Harris visited various European countries in search of the secret of a healthy and happy long life. “We’ve decided to tackle getting older head on,” as McGuinness put it (a rather unfortunate turn of phrase given Top Gear’s record of accidents).

McGuinness had recently turned 50, while Harris was a year short of this milestone, but is still seemed like a weak excuse for sending them on the road. A lazily contrived job creation scheme, more like.

Anyway, their first stop was Sweden, “home of flatpack furniture and Abba” – a taster of the upcoming shallow dive into the Scandinavian psyche. They began by joining a bunch of naked (but suitably pixellated) male Swedish pensioners in a sauna, before a forest workout with a triathlete called Jonas that involved chopping down trees and throwing rocks. So much nicer than exercising in the gym, they both agreed.

Advertisement
Paddy and Chris Road Tripping,29-09-2024,1,Paddy McGuinness;Chris Harris,Paddy and Chris get ready for an ice hockey game with with Fr?lunda Hockey Club in Gothenburg,BBC Studios
Paddy and Chris played a game of ice hockey in Gothenburg (Photo: BBC/BBC Studios)

Then it all became a bit Rob and Romesh vs… (the Sky series in which Rob Beckett and Romesh Ranganathan try activities way beyond their skill set) as the pair joined in a game of ice-hockey with some professional players. They also trespassed on Travel Man terrain by riding on a big dipper in a Gothenburg amusement park (“having fun boosts your immune system” was their excuse). In fact, the programme was such a medley of other travelogues that by the time they got to eat some seaweed, I wouldn’t have been surprised if Joanna Lumley had joined them.

The only time either presenter felt properly engaged was when Harris started enthusing over the 23-year-old Volvo V70 that they were driving around in. Having admired the car’s “nicely spaced pedal box” and “five-cylinder warble”, Harris was immediately shut down by McGuinness. “You’ve got to stop doing that on this trip… we’ve got a different set of viewers.” Have they really? I predict a sizeable overlap in the Venn diagram illustrating shared viewer demographics with Top Gear – to start with at least, as committed petrolheads may not stay the distance.

With all their musings on ageing and assurances that they were having a great time, I was forcibly reminded of the superior Mortimer and Whitehouse: Gone Fishing. But there’s a reason why pairs of comedians dominate this type of programme – they spark off each other. McGuinness (a comedian) and Harris (not a comedian) did make each other laugh with their lads-on-tour bants – the difference between the words “arse” and “anus” received much discussion – but their on-screen hysterics didn’t make me laugh.

The seeming obsession with intimate body parts continued with McGuinness, showering with the professional ice-hockey players, claiming he’d “never seen as much penis as I have in Sweden”. Harris meanwhile opined that “I can’t believe I’ve gone from test-driving Lamborghinis to sharing a shower with McGuinness”. He wasn’t alone there.

‘Paddy and Chris: Road Tripping’ continues next Sunday at 8pm on BBC One

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 WordupNews.com