Since Hamas’ brutal invasion of Israel on October 7, 2023, antisemitic incidents in the United States and around the world have risen exponentially.
These incidents include acts of violence, harassment, vandalism, and glorification of anti-Israel terrorism.
As this rise in antisemitism can be tied to the October 7 attack and its aftermath, the question needs to be asked: Have the media played a role in this surge of antisemitism?
Throughout the war, both mainstream media organizations and alternative news sources on social media have parroted Hamas propaganda, spread unsubstantiated claims about Israel’s conduct, and concocted narratives that besmirch Israel’s reputation in the international arena.
Advertisement
While there is no definitive way of determining the extent to which the media’s portrayal of Israel has affected this rise in antisemitism, there is an interesting correlation between certain months where antisemitic incidents peaked and the media trends that existed during that month.
The following is a look at those months where antisemitic incidents rose (in comparison to the previous month) and the media stories that may have influenced this dangerous rise in anti-Jewish bigotry.
October 2023
Between September 2023 and October 2023, antisemitic incidents rose by 253%.
Here are some major stories and trends that appeared in the media’s coverage during October that may have contributed to this rise:
Advertisement
Even in the immediate aftermath of the October 7 attack, some news organizations were already creating an anti-Israel narrative by parroting Hamas’ justification for its attack, creating an equivalence between Israeli and Hamas casualties, or turning their focus to Israel’s response and away from the atrocities themselves.
After an explosion occurred at Al-Ahli Hospital, the media rushed to publish the Hamas Ministry of Health’s claim that an Israeli airstrike on the hospital had killed 500 people who were sheltering on the grounds. It was only later that these same outlets were forced to backtrack, recognizing that it was not an Israeli attack that had caused the explosion and that the number of casualties was much lower than initially reported.
In preparation for its ground operation into Gaza, the IDF issued an order for Palestinians living in northern Gaza to move south for their own safety. However, several news outlets misrepresented this order and Israel’s actions to protect innocent Palestinians. Both Reuters and The Telegraph misrepresented the order as saying that the IDF would treat anyone remaining in northern Gaza as a terrorist while the British Medical Journal published a piece which termed this order as being akin to “expulsion.”
At the same time as Palestinians were evacuating to southern Gaza, several mainstream media organizations uncritically shared the Hamas-run Ministry of Health’s claim that 70 Palestinians were killed by an Israeli strike while fleeing to the south. Despite the lack of hard evidence for this claim (and the IDF’s denial that it was operating in the area at the time), it was shared widely as fact by such outlets as MSNBC, Sky News, and the Washington Post.
Near the end of October, a variety of esteemed media organizations published similarly worded pieces wherein they justified their reliance on casualty statistics released by the Gaza Health Ministry, thus legitimizing the use of Hamas propaganda.
⚠️ SOME VIEWERS MAY FIND THIS CONTENT DISTRESSING.
Early this morning, Hamas launched a surprise attack on Israel.
Men, women, and children have been murdered and abducted. 22 communities are overrun with terrorists. 40,000 reservists are called up for duty.
After a slight drop in November (possibly due to the ceasefire and hostage-prisoner swap held between Israel and Hamas at the end of the month), antisemitic incidents rose once again in December 2023.
Here are some major stories and trends that appeared in the media coverage that may have contributed to this rise that month:
At the beginning of December, several news organizations presented a skewed portrait of the end of the ceasefire, either downplaying the fact that Hamas broke the ceasefire with a barrage of rockets or only focusing on Israel’s resumption of military activities and Hamas’ aggression.
As Israeli forces moved further into Gaza, images began to emerge of male detainees stripped to their underwear and blindfolded. While this is proper procedure when dealing with suspected terrorists who may or may not be armed/wearing a suicide vest, various conspiracy theories began to emerge online about these images portraying Palestinians taken hostage by Israel or even being lined up for mass execution. At the same time, several media organizations downplayed the IDF’s legitimate reason for using these tactics while detaining suspects, portraying these images as a humiliation tactic or an example of Israeli barbarity.
In their initial reports on a congressional hearing about campus antisemitism, several news outlets glossed over the fact that three university presidents would not condemn calls for Jewish genocide, effectively downplaying the concerning rise of antisemitism on university campuses and gaslighting the Jewish community.
As December is the holiday season, various news organizations published stories on how the war was harming the observance of Christmas in the Holy Land, with subdued celebrations and a reduced presence of tourists. In effect, these news organizations were blaming Israel for ruining Christmas.
In a report on corpses from Gaza being briefly brought into Israel for identification (to determine if they belonged to Israeli hostages), the Washington Post uncritically parroted a Hamas blood libel that the bodies had been returned without organs.
A disturbing trend that emerged in December was the reliance of several news outlets on the Euro-Med Human Rights Monitor NGO, despite the fact that the organization has ties to Hamas and is known to fabricate stories meant to besmirch Israel’s reputation.
Advertisement
January 2024
January 2024 continued to see a high number of antisemitic incidents, with 65% of these related to Israel.
Here are some major stories and trends that appeared in the media coverage that may have contributed:
As the South African genocide case against Israel was presented to the International Court of Justice in mid-January, there was a special focus on these baseless allegations throughout the month in the media and on social media. Some, such as New York Times opinion writer Megan Stack, used their media platforms to bolster the libel that Israel’s defensive war was an act of genocide.
Near the end of the month, some media outlets publicized Hamas’ justification of the October 7 atrocities while others parroted Hamas’ ceasefire offer, falsely presenting the terror group as an antiwar movement.
The British channel ITV published a three-minute video that purported to show a Palestinian man with a white flag being shot by an Israeli soldier. However, the video was edited and HonestReporting raised several questions about its reliability. Despite the sketchy nature of this video, it went viral on social media and fomented a significant amount of outrage against Israel.
A CNN story about the IDF allegedly desecrating Gazan cemeteries went viral even though the IDF later revealed that Israeli forces were forced to operate in the cemetery due to Hamas tunneling under it and using it for combat purposes.
Advertisement
March 2024
March 2024 saw a rise in antisemitic incidents from February, with 78.5% of these incidents being related to Israel.
Here are some major stories and trends in the media that may have affected this uptick in antisemitic incidents:
Several major news organizations, like The New York Times, CNN, and NPR, spread the false claims that Israel was severely restricting the entry of aid into the Gaza Strip and that no aid had reached the enclave’s northern half.
The claim that due to the war, there was starvation in Gaza. In order to illustrate this humanitarian concern, The New York Times profiled the death of someone with a pre-existing medical condition while CNN published the medically questionable claim that a one-day-old baby had died of starvation.
Major news organizations such as LA Times, The New York Times, and AFP cited Euro-Med Human Rights Monitor as a legitimate source despite its affiliation with Hamas and its history of spreading false and libelous information about the Jewish state.
Al Jazeera’s false story that Israeli troops were raping Palestinian women in al-Shifa hospital. By the time it was deleted the next day, the story had already gone viral on social media.
Al Jazeera’s IDF rape allegations in Gaza highlight a key question: Are fabricated stories against Israel exceptions or part of propaganda strategies by Al Jazeera and Hamas?
(Some language has been edited to avoid censorship on other social media platforms). pic.twitter.com/kPi0oMXvmU
For a second month in a row, antisemitic incidents continued to rise, with almost 76% of these incidents being related to Israel.
In the aftermath of the accidental killing of seven World Central Kitchen aid workers by an Israeli drone, several news organizations held up the incident as uniquely severe, instead of another tragic case of “friendly fire” in the annals of Western military history. This helped develop a false narrative whereby Israel has gone “rogue” and is exceptionally aggressive.
One of the biggest Israel-related stories of April was the Iranian rocket and drone attack against Israel. However, rather than castigate the Islamic Republic for its assault on the Jewish state, various media organizations either rationalized the Iranian attack or minimized its ferocity, ultimately creating a narrative that implicitly legitimizes politically based attacks on Jews and Israelis.
Another major story in April was the anti-Israel encampments that spread throughout university campuses. The media chose to portray these encampments and their accompanying protests as “antiwar” and “pro-Palestinian,” downplaying the antisemitic rhetoric and celebration of anti-Israel violence that became commonplace. In effect, the media provided a shield of gaslighting and obfuscation for those advocating for Israel’s destruction and against Jewish students.
As part of the reporting on these encampments and protests, some media aimed to legitimize them by spreading Hamas casualty numbers as the basis for their existence.
Near the end of April, Hamas’ false allegations about the discovery of mass graves outside of Gazan hospitals with evidence of execution-style killings by Israeli forces went viral online and were also spread by several mainstream media organizations which appeared to take Hamas (and the UN officials who parroted their claims) at their word.
Let’s not sugarcoat it: the protests on university campuses are not about peace but about spreading anti-Israel and anti-Jewish sentiments. The media has often obscured these truths, gaslighting Jewish students and downplaying the violence they face. pic.twitter.com/PH0BXr9KKe
After two months of decreasing antisemitic incidents, the number of incidents rose in July, with 61% of incidents being related to Israel.
The media cited several biased “UN experts” who claimed that famine was spreading in Gaza, even though the allegation was unsubstantiated.
One of the biggest sources of misinformation in July was a “correspondence” piece in the Lancet medical journal that baselessly claimed that the Gaza death toll was as high as 186,000. Even though there was zero evidence to back up this allegation, it was still spread by various media organizations, including Al Jazeera, The Washington Post, MSNBC, The Independent, and The Irish Times.
Following an Israeli airstrike against the Houthis in retaliation for an attack on Tel Aviv that killed one Israeli and injured 10 others, several media reports either falsely portrayed this airstrike as indiscriminately targeting civilian areas or disregarded any mention of the Houthi attack that precipitated the Israeli response.
A BBC story about an IDF dog attacking a Palestinian man with Down Syndrome and allegedly leaving him for dead left out several salient facts, including that members of his family were affiliated with Hamas, that the attack occurred during a battle between Israeli soldiers and terrorists, and that even though Israeli forces had left the area soon after the attack, the family did not return to look for the man until a week later. The BBC’s narrative left the false impression that Israeli forces cruelly use dogs to attack innocent and vulnerable Palestinians.
After a Hezbollah rocket killed 12 Druze children playing soccer in Majdal Shams, news reports downplayed the fact that the victims were children, drew false comparisons between this strike and Israeli airstrikes in Gaza, and even tried to provide a post-facto justification for it.
In response to the Hezbollah rocket attack in Majdal Shams, Israel killed Fouad Shukr, a senior Hezbollah military commander, in a targeted strike. Several news organizations ignored who the target was, making it seem as if Israel was indiscriminately bombing a Beirut suburb.
Seen the wild claim “186,000 Palestinians killed in Gaza”?
Here’s the scoop: they multiplied current, inaccurate death tolls by 4 to get this number. Even worse, the media ran with it, spreading false info far and wide. pic.twitter.com/dPfRM9mVlN
Once again, antisemitic incidents rose for the second month in a row, with 57% of incidents being related to Israel.
Following the assassination of Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh in Tehran, several mainstream media organizations (such as Reuters, Wall Street Journal, The Guardian, and The New York Times) sought to portray the terror head as a moderate voice and pragmatist and accused Israel of causing a dangerous escalation in the region. The connection between antisemitic incidents and false narratives about Israel was made clear when the NYPD was forced to boost patrols in Jewish neighborhoods in the wake of the assassinations of Haniyeh and Fouad Shukr.
In mid-August, Israel struck a Hamas command center that was located in an UNRWA school-turned-shelter, killing 19 terrorists. However, several news organizations relied on Hamas sources to portray this as an attack on civilians or as part of a continued campaign by Israel against Gazan schools, with some even completely ignoring the fact that Hamas terrorists were killed in the strike.
Later in the month, Israel pre-emptively struck Hezbollah rocket launchers as the Lebanon-based terror organization was planning a major assault on the Jewish state. The New York Times, LA Times and NPR portrayed Israel as the aggressor and the initiator of hostilities while Sky News accused Israel of risking a regional war by defending its people and territory.
Another theme that permeated media coverage in August was the claim that a polio epidemic was threatening Gaza’s children, based on one confirmed case in the enclave. This was another instance where the media parroted projections of a humanitarian disaster (that had not yet occurred) in order to besmirch Israel’s defensive campaign in Gaza.
An IDF’s strike killed 19 terrorists. But instead of reporting the facts, major outlets like CNN and Reuters echoed Hamas’ false claims.
The truth? The strike targeted a command center hidden in a mosque, not civilians. pic.twitter.com/GnlEEkHQu2
As we can see from the above, there is a strong correlation between the months that antisemitism spiked and negative coverage of Israel in the media and online during those same months.
While the extent of the media’s influence on antisemitic trends cannot be definitively determined, this apparent correlation is a reminder to all media organizations, journalists, and social media users that the narratives they put forward about the Israel-Hamas war do not stay on the page or online — they have real-world consequences.
Liked this article? Follow HonestReporting on Twitter, Facebook, Instagram and TikTok to see even more posts and videos debunking news bias and smears, as well as other content explaining what’s really going on in Israel and the region.
England has a housing crisis – more than one million families and individuals are on the waiting list for a social home.
Experts think 90,000 of these homes need to be built every year for a decade to house everyone – but less than 5,000 were completed in the past year.
And there are fears the problem will become even worse.
We spoke to organisations working in the planning, building and management of social homes who tell us they are in a “perfect storm” of financial uncertainty, unsuitable construction and huge bills for repairs.
Advertisement
The result, they say, is that thousands of sites earmarked for affordable and social housing are not being built despite the enormous need.
The Home Builders Federation, which represents housebuilders, told the BBC their members have at least 13,000 affordable properties, including social homes, ready to be built right now.
But they can’t start because there are no housing providers to buy these properties.
“It is a major and growing problem that is increasingly threatening affordable and overall housing supply,” says Steve Turner, executive director at the Home Builders Federation. “Small sites are being prevented from starting and larger sites are being halted as a result.”
Advertisement
Tragedies of Grenfell and Awaab
The largest problem, experts tell us, is that housing providers – predominantly housing associations – no longer have as much money to spend on buying new properties as they did before.
Housing associations are mostly not-for-profit organisations that buy up affordable properties and rent them as social homes to low income tenants at discounted rates, receiving a government subsidy to do so.
They’re having to spend more money on repairing the homes they already own, they say – meaning less to spend on buying new properties.
The National Housing Federation (NHF), which represents housing associations, estimates it will cost their members £6bn.
They also say they are spending more money on fixing damp problems following the death of two-year-old Awaab Ishak, who died of breathing problems caused by mould.
Housing associations are making less money from renting out social homes, too, they say.
Marie Chadwick, policy leader at the NHF, explains that over the last decade the government has been cutting and capping the rent paid by social housing tenants.
“This equated to £3 billion in lost rental income for housing associations last year,” she says.
As well as having less money than expected, the frequently changing rent levels mean housing associations struggle to predict how much rental income they will have in future, they say.
Advertisement
They say that this uncertainty makes budgeting how much they can spend on buying new properties more difficult and reduces the amount of money banks are willing to lend them to fund these purchases.
High interest rates also make borrowing this money more expensive.
‘Financial havoc’
The situation has gotten so bad that several councils warn they could go bankrupt unless more social homes are built – because of the money they’re spending on temporary housing for people on waiting lists.
Advertisement
In the past year they spent more than £1 billion on temporary accommodation for people with nowhere else to go.
If their areas had more social homes, they could house these people instead of paying for them to stay in hotels and hostels.
Some councils still buy and manage their own social homes – but the financial pressure they’re under means they can’t afford to buy the new properties being offered by housebuilders, they say.
These financial problems, affecting housing associations and councils, were described to us repeatedly as the main reason why thousands of sites earmarked for affordable and social housing are not being built – despite England’s enormous need for them.
‘Not what we want’
There’s also the problem of the social homes not matching what the housing associations want.
Housing associations also say too many of these homes have gas boilers, which don’t fit their plans to be more environmentally friendly. The UK is legally obliged to reach net zero carbon emissions by 2050.
Several organisations told us that more of these planned social homes might have been bought if housing associations had been more closely involved at the start of the planning process.
Housebuilders say their homes were approved by councils and that changing them now to suit the wishes of housing associations would be costly.
“It’s a perfect storm,” says Ms Chadwick, an assessment several other people we spoke to agreed with.
Advertisement
“These factors have inevitably led to a reduction in plans for building new affordable and social housing at a time when they are needed more than ever.”
Government’s conundrum
What might help? Housebuilders say that homes previously agreed to be built as affordable housing, under what are known as Section 106 contracts, could be allowed for sale on the open market.
They say this would allow them to build more homes and help meet the government’s overall target for house building – 1.5 million in the next five years.
Advertisement
In return, housebuilders would give some money from these sales to councils.
But that doesn’t help councils get the social homes they need for families stuck on the waiting list.
Another possibility is for the government to alter the rules around the way housing associations can spend the money they are given or – as was often said to us – they could give them more money overall to buy newly built social homes.
The government says itrecognises the need, with the ministry of housing telling us the next five years would see the “biggest increase in social and affordable housing in a generation”.
Ms Neate adds: “If we truly want economic growth in this country, we can’t afford not to build.
Advertisement
“The government must set a clear target and invest in a new generation of social rent homes – building 90,000 a year for ten years will clear social housing waiting lists and end homelessness for good.”
Roula Khalaf, Editor of the FT, selects her favourite stories in this weekly newsletter.
UK businesses have put hiring on hold because of uncertainty over the government’s plans on tax, industrial strategy and workers’ rights, a closely watched survey showed on Monday.
Recruiters placed fewer people in jobs in September, in a continuation of a market slowdown that has lasted two years, the monthly report from KPMG and the Recruitment & Employment Confederation showed. Meanwhile growth in starting salaries was at its weakest since February 2021.
Advertisement
Jon Holt, UK senior partner at KPMG, said businesses had put the brakes on recruitment in the run-up to the Budget to “wait for clarity on future taxation, business and economic policy”.
Recruitment agencies responding to the survey said they had placed fewer people in permanent positions that month because “unclear government policy” had made their clients cautious.
An index measuring permanent placements rose from 44.6 in August to 44.9 in September, but remained well below the reading of 50 that would signal stable activity. Meanwhile a decline in temporary billings gathered pace.
The figures are the latest sign that confidence in the UK economy has been rattled by ministers’ warnings that tough decisions on tax, benefits and spending would be needed in the Budget to balance the books.
Advertisement
A separate survey published last month showed the prospect of a painful Budget had also hit households’ morale, with consumer confidence dropping sharply in September, even though the Bank of England’s August interest rate cut was starting to feed through to mortgage rates.
Since then, chancellor Rachel Reeves has been seeking to convey a more upbeat message, telling the Financial Times last week that the Budget would be about investment, and not about fresh public sector austerity.
“The government needs to continue to give chief executives confidence in the UK’s macroeconomic conditions and the country’s route to stronger growth,” said Holt.
Recruiters polled by KPMG and the REC have been reporting falling demand for staff for more than a year. In September, the drop in demand for permanent roles was sharpest in retail, construction and in the technology sector. The only significant growth in demand was for medical, nursing and care workers.
Advertisement
Because of the drop in demand, businesses that struggled to fill vacancies a year ago are now finding there are far more candidates looking for work, the survey indicated — some recently made redundant.
The KPMG/REC survey is closely watched by policymakers at present, because ongoing problems with the Office for National Statistics’ labour force survey mean there is no reliable gauge of unemployment.
REC chief executive Neil Carberry said any further move by the BoE to cut interest rates would boost business, but that “eyes are also on the government” to set a clear industrial strategy and give employers more certainty over its plans for sweeping reforms to employment law.
SHOPPERS are racing to get a Home Bargains dupe of a beloved M&S chocolate snack scanning at a cheaper price.
A savvy shopper posted the dupe in the Food Find UK OfficialFacebook group, where bargain hunters regularly share new items they discover in supermarkets.
Home Bargain’s new Elkes Temptations is a dupe of M&S’ popular Milk Chocolate Custard Creams.
The knock-off treats are scanning at the popular discount chain’s tills for only £1.99.
This is just over £1 less than the price at which M&S is selling their chocolatey snack.
Home Bargain fans can choose from a Chocolatey Custard Cream or the sought-after Chocolatey Bourbon Creams.
Advertisement
The caption for the post read: “Found these in-home bargains today they are £1.99 bit cheaper than the M&S ones not tried them yet.”
Hundreds of fellow bargain hunters have left likes and left comments expressing their desire to snap up the tasty treats.
One user cried: “I need these.”
“I need to go on the hunt for these,” another wrote.
Advertisement
A third commented: “Need cause the M&S ones are banging.”
“Thanks so much for sharing,” a fourth added.
‘We need to go NOW!’ Home Bargains shoppers say as sold-out viral Polar Express PJs return, but you’ll have to be quick
Last year M&S made a shock change to its bourbons and custard cream biscuits, as fans revealed the new versions taste like another classic chocolate bar.
The high street retail giant launched the new range from its Food brand, prompting people to pile in with reviews on social media.
Advertisement
The new Marks & Spencer offerings included savoury snacks as well as sweets.
Yet the ones that appeared to get the most responses were the custard creams and milk chocolate-coated bourbon-style biscuits.
The company deliberately fashioned their new treats on long-established “customer favourites”, it acknowledged.
The products had names such as Outrageously Chocolatey Chocolate-Coated Custard Creams and Outrageously Chocolatey Chocolate-Coated Bourbons, both priced at £2.50 per pack.
Advertisement
Comments on the official M&S Instagram channel in reply to the new arrivals included “These are insanely good” and “You have absolutely knocked it out of the park”.
Another fan posted: “These are like TimTams on steroids!”
University of Oxford historian Dr Francis Young said: “The words ‘historic’ and ‘breakthrough’ get bandied about a lot, but in the case of chocolate-covered custard creams we could be looking at something that genuinely changes the world for the better.”
And writer Anna Tuckett posted on X, formerly Twitter: “The rumours were true, this is an improvement on standard custard creams.”
Advertisement
How to save money on chocolate
WE all love a bit of chocolate from now and then, but you don’t have to break the bank buying your favourite bar.
Consumer reporter Sam Walker reveals how to cut costs…
Go own brand – if you’re not too fussed on flavour and just want to supplant your chocolate cravings, you’ll save by going for supermarket’s own brand bars.
Advertisement
Shop around – if you’ve spotted your favourite variety at the supermarket, make sure you check if it’s cheaper elsewhere.
Websites like Trolley.co.uk let you compare prices on products across all the major chains to see if you’re getting the best deal.
Look out for yellow stickers – supermarket staff put yellow, and sometimes orange and red, stickers on to products to show they’ve been reduced.
They usually do this if the product is coming to the end of its best before date or the packaging is slightly damaged.
Advertisement
Buy bigger bars – most of the time, but not always, chocolate is cheaper per 100g the larger the bar.
So if you’ve got the appetite, and you were going to buy a hefty amount of chocolate anyway, you might as well go bigger.
One man has died and three people have been injured following an explosion in a block of flats in Alloa, Clackmannanshire.
The man, who has not yet been identified, was inside the property when the explosion occurred and was pronounced dead at the scene.
Police and emergency services declared a major incident at the property in Kellie Place on Sunday evening.
Police Scotland Sergeant Neill Drummond said the force was “still working to establish the full circumstances of what happened at this property”, but the cause of the explosion was still unknown.
Advertisement
“However, we can confirm that one male has passed away,” he added.
“Our inquiries to confirm his identity and provide his next of kin with all the necessary support they may require are ongoing.”
Three other individuals who were injured were taken to Forth Valley Royal Infirmary for treatment.
Police Scotland said they had been alerted at about 18:00 that a building had been badly damaged.
Advertisement
Eleven vehicles were sent including specialist units, the Scottish Fire and Rescue Service said.
Alloa Town Hall has been opened as a respite centre for occupants of the other flats within the address, while gas and electrical work is checked.
Police said they would be “appropriately supported with alternative accommodation” if their homes were not deemed safe to return to.
The fire service said specialist urban search and rescue units and a heavy rescue unit were among the resources it had deployed.
Advertisement
A spokesperson said: “Crews are working with emergency service partners to make the area safe.”
A number of road closures along the A907, B9096, Kellie Place and Tullibody Road that had been implemented by police are in the process of being lifted, but further utilities work may be required, resulting in additional closures they said.
Fidelity International, Mercer, Penny and Pension Lab are the latest companies to join the Pensions Dashboards Operators Coalition (DOC).
This now brings consumers’ choice of potential dashboards to 15.
The existing member firms of the Pensions DOC are Aviva, Just Group, Legal & General, Mintago, Moneybox, Moneyhub, NatWest Cushon, Scottish Widows (part of Lloyds Banking Group), Smart Pension and Standard Life (part of Phoenix Group), and the MoneyHelper pensions dashboard from the Money and Pensions Service (MaPS).
Fidelity International supports retail and workplace savers with their plans for retirement. To help them achieve their financial goals, it will explore opportunities to offer savers a single, consolidated view of their pension wealth through its online services, via a commercial pensions dashboard.
Advertisement
Mercer is now looking to further enhance its communication and engagement by adding in a commercial pensions dashboard or Qualifying Pensions Dashboard Service (QPDS).
Penny makes it seamless for individuals to locate and consolidate their pension pots. It intends to include a QPDS within its simple modern app providing customers with a secure and enjoyable experience.
Pension Lab is a leading provider of white-labelled pension transfer and consolidation dashboards. The company now aims to extend its Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) permissions to become an authorised QPDS operator.
Independent Dashboards consultant Richard Smith leads the DOC initiative.
Advertisement
He said: “Especially since the onset of the FCA’s Consumer Duty requirements, more and more pension providers are deciding they can only properly help their customers with retirement planning if they can show them all the pensions they’ve got, together.
“It’s going to be so good for UK consumers to have so many opportunities to see their total pension position on whichever is their favourite and most trusted app, emulating the success on this we’ve seen in Norway. Soon, providers who don’t intend to offer a QPDS will be the exception.”
Fidelity International head of workplace investing distribution Dan Smith said: “We believe pensions dashboards are fundamental to improving savers’ retirement outcomes. Providing them with a single view of their pensions savings will help to increase levels of engagement, while addressing the challenges presented by a proliferation of small pots.
“The Coalition presents an excellent opportunity for the industry to work together and share best practice, to support with the implementation of dashboards. We look forward to collaborating with its members to support the delivery of commercial pensions dashboards for the benefit of our retirement savers.”
Dashboards provide consumers with a consolidated view of their pensions, making it easier to track and manage their retirement savings and make informed decisions about their retirement.
You must be logged in to post a comment Login