The UK government is chartering another flight for British nationals to leave Lebanon on Sunday, as it urges people to exit the country which is gripped by conflict.

More than 250 UK citizens have already left on chartered flights. As of Friday morning, more than 2,000 British nationals had registered their presence in the country, the Foreign Office said.

The flight will be the fourth specially organised by the government. British nationals who have registered their presence will be sent details on how to request a seat.

The Foreign Office said there were no more scheduled flights because of a “decrease in demand”. However, the situation will be kept under constant review.

It said three flights had already been chartered to help British nationals leave.

The number of people telling the UK government they are in Lebanon should be treated with caution because British nationals do not have to register their presence there.

“Based on our contacts so far, we also anticipate that only a fraction want to leave due to their strong ties in the country,” the Foreign Office added.

Neighbouring Israel began a ground invasion of Lebanon this week in its battle with the country’s powerful Hezbollah militant group.

It has bombed Hezbollah targets in the capital Beirut.

British nationals and their spouse or partner, and children under the age of 18, are eligible to take the new chartered flight, with vulnerable people a priority.

As of last month, there were thought to be between 4,000 and 6,000 UK nationals, including dependants, in Lebanon.

Some have been able to leave on commercial flights but said empty seats were hard to find.

The Foreign Office earlier said it was working to increase capacity on commercial flights for British nationals, and that around 700 troops and government staff had been deployed to Cyprus for “contingency planning”.

Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer urged British nationals still in the country to come forward to be evacuated, saying: “Now is the time to leave, we have got the plans in place.”

Foreign Secretary David Lammy said: “The situation in Lebanon remains volatile, so I am glad that we have helped the many people who have heeded our advice to leave the country immediately.

“With demand falling, and the security situation deteriorating, there is no guarantee other options to leave quickly will become available. I urge anyone who wants to leave to register now.”

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

Roula Khalaf, Editor of the FT, selects her favourite stories in this weekly newsletter.

One of England’s most senior judges is leaving his role as president of the UK’s influential Competition Appeal Tribunal, two months after he was reprimanded for sending an ‘inappropriate’ letter to a junior member of staff.

Sir Marcus Smith is stepping down as president of the CAT, the venue for class action lawsuits against some of the world’s largest companies including Apple, Google and Mastercard, at the end of his three-year term, which is not being renewed.

His predecessor, Sir Peter Roth, who held the position for about eight years, is to reassume the position on a temporary basis while a permanent replacement is found. Roth’s predecessor, Sir Gerald Barling, was in the role for about six years.

Smith’s departure comes after the Judicial Conduct Investigations Office (Jico), which deals with complaints against judges, said in August that he had been reprimanded for serious misconduct after his communications with a staff member left her feeling “distressed” and “angry”.

An investigation found that he passed her a handwritten letter “expressing his love for her and that he wanted to take things further”, and also that he had “abused his position”.

The reprimand, issued by the Lady Chief Justice, Baroness Carr, and approved by Shabana Mahmood, the Lord Chancellor and justice secretary, was the most serious sanction short of removal from office, the Jico said.

In his response to the complaint, Smith acknowledged that the letter was “plainly inappropriate” and had caused significant emotional distress, according to the Jico.

He had “been ignoring warning signs about his workload and health” and said the letter was a “poorly framed attempt to reach out for support and to discuss his problem”, the office said at the time. He gave an assurance that there would be no repeat of such behaviour.

Smith, who remains a High Court judge, declined through the Judicial Office to comment on his departure from the CAT.

In a brief statement this week, the CAT said the president’s term of office would end on November 4. A spokesperson confirmed that it could be renewed, with the appointment handled by the Judicial Appointments Commission.

The CAT, established in 2003, has since become one of the UK’s most important venues for disputes. They include a wave of class action claims filed on behalf of consumers who complain companies have abused dominant positions.

A HOMESICK expat flew 690 miles to the UK for a stay of less than three hours — just to have a Nando’s.

Mark Rofe, 34, yearned for their trademark peri-peri chicken and had no interest in seeing family or friends during the whirlwind trip.

6

6

Advertisement

6

He flew from Barcelona to land at Gatwick Airport at 1.50pm on Wednesday — heading immediately to the chain’s restaurant in the South Terminal.

After feasting, he got on the 4.30pm flight back — taking a chicken wrap to have on the plane.

Marketer Mark said: “Nando’s has a place in my heart, and my belly.

“I know it’s not originally British but I think it’s part of British culture — I mean Ed Sheeran even wrote a song about Nando’s.

“Nothing even comes close to it in Spain.”

The South African chain has no branches in mainland Europe.

The entire trip, including flights, meal and some sauces to take home, cost £95.39.

Mark, originally from Haslemere, Surrey, said his family “thought I was a bit of an idiot and they’re not wrong”.

But he added: “I have no regrets.”

6

6

Advertisement

6

When your splendid article “Making scents of Myanmar” (HTSI, September 28) was published last Saturday I was coincidentally fundraising for the flooded area of Myanmar where people have lost their homes and crops. So it was good to read that Kathleen Baird-Murray, alongside her commercial activities making a memorable Burmese perfume, is supporting socially beneficial charities in such a poor country.

My money is going to an unimpeachable team helping to relieve the emergency in the flood-stricken areas.

Hopefully your article will stimulate more readers to donate to the poor people of Myanmar.

Mala Tu
Calne, Wiltshire, UK

HOUSTON (AP) — A federal judge on Friday denied a request by a Black high school student in Texas for a court order that the student’s lawyers say would have allowed him to return to his high school without fear of having his previous punishment over his hairstyle resume.

Darryl George had sought to reenroll at his Houston-area high school in the Barbers Hill school district after leaving at the start of his senior year in August because district officials were set to continue punishing him for not cutting his hair. George had spent nearly all of his junior year serving in-school suspension over his hairstyle.

The district has argued that George’s long hair, which he wears to school in tied and twisted locs on top of his head, violates its policy because if let down, it would fall below his shirt collar, eyebrows or earlobes.

George, 19, had asked U.S. District Judge Jeffrey Brown in Galveston to issue a temporary restraining order that would have prevented district officials from further punishing him if he returned and while a federal lawsuit he filed proceeds.

But in a ruling issued late Friday afternoon, Brown denied George’s request, saying the student and his lawyers had waited too long to ask for the order.

George’s request had come after Brown in August dismissed most of the claims the student and his mother had filed in their federal lawsuit alleging school district officials committed racial and gender discrimination when they punished him.

The judge only let the gender discrimination claim stand.

In his ruling, Brown said he also denied George’s request for a temporary restraining order because the school district was more likely to prevail in the lawsuit’s remaining claim.

Brown’s ruling was coincidentally issued on George’s birthday. He turned 19 years old on Friday.

Allie Booker, an attorney for George, and a spokesperson for the Barbers Hill school district did not immediately return a call or email seeking comment.

George’s lawyer had said the student left Barbers Hill High School in Mont Belvieu and transferred to another high school in a different Houston area district after suffering a nervous breakdown over the thought of facing another year of punishment.

In court documents filed this week, attorneys for the school district said George didn’t have legal standing to request the restraining order because he is no longer a student in the district.

The district has defended its dress code, which says its policies for students are meant to “teach grooming and hygiene, instill discipline, prevent disruption, avoid safety hazards and teach respect for authority.”

George’s federal lawsuit also alleged that his punishment violates the CROWN Act, a recent state law prohibiting race-based discrimination of hair. The CROWN Act, which was being discussed before the dispute over George’s hair and which took effect in September 2023, bars employers and schools from penalizing people because of hair texture or protective hairstyles including Afros, braids, locs, twists or Bantu knots.

In February, a state judge ruled in a lawsuit filed by the school district that its punishment does not violate the CROWN Act.

___

Follow Juan A. Lozano: https://twitter.com/juanlozano70