Connect with us

News

Inside Lebanon’s Displacement Crisis | TIME

Published

on

Inside Lebanon's Displacement Crisis | TIME

Inside an unfurnished apartment in the Hazmieh suburb of Beirut, 10 members of the Hassan family are sleeping on bare mattresses on the cream-tiled floor. The boxes pushed to a corner of the living room, beside a cage for their yellow-faced blue budgerigar Paco, underscores how fast they had to flee their homes in the southern suburbs of Lebanon’s capital amid a fierce Israeli bombardment whose scale has few parallels in 21st century warfare.

“One of the explosions was so close we could feel the heat on our faces,” said Rana Hassan. “Even as we drove here we could still hear the bombings happening. We slept on the floor that night,” she added, touching the tiles to emphasize her shock.

The Hassans escaped the Shia-majority southern suburbs—or Dahiyeh in Arabic—fearing Israeli airstrikes that have blanketed southern Lebanon and are now pummeling their neighborhood. The attacks across Lebanon have killed more than 1,000 people in under two weeks, according to the health ministry. Lebanese authorities say more than 1.2 million (in a country of 5 million) have, like the Hassan family, fled their homes.

Lebanese-Israeli conflict - Beirut
Smoke billows from the site of an airstrike in Beirut, on Oct. 3.Stringer/picture alliance/Getty Images

They hurried first to Rana’s house in nearby Choueifat, where her 16-year-old daughter Rima filmed footage from the balcony that she eagerly shows me on her cell phone, a column of fire and smoke billowing into the sky from an Israeli airstrike some 200 ft. away. The attacks spurred them to flee a second time, one cousin carrying his ailing father down the stairs on his back, before arriving in Hazmieh, in the foothills of Mount Lebanon.

The trail of destruction and mass displacement across Lebanon has rapidly upended a fragile status quo between Israel and Hezbollah. The two sides had been trading fire for almost a year in a low-grade conflict after the militant group began launching rockets into northern Israel on Oct. 8 in solidarity with Gaza.

Advertisement

Then Israel sharply escalated the fight. First came the twin pager-radio attacks on Sept. 17-18 that killed at least 37 and wounded 3,000, including bystanders and children. Then the assassination of Hezbollah’s longtime and charismatic leader Hassan Nasrallah in a bunker beneath a cluster of tower blocks in Dahiyeh. Amid the craters of bombed-out apartment blocks in the southern suburbs and burnt farmlands in the countryside, Lebanon’s Shia community is struggling to figure out what comes next.

More Strikes In Beirut As Israel Launches Ground Offensive In Lebanon
A woman carries personal items as she leaves the area, which has been hit multiple times in recent days by Israeli airstrikes, in Beirut, on Oct. 2.Daniel Carde—Getty Images

Read More: Fear Grips Lebanon After Deadly Pager and Radio Blasts

“We wait each night for the evacuation announcements at 2 a.m.—it could even be here,” said 30-year-old Ali Hassan, perched on a camping chair in the family’s makeshift living room. Rana, his sister, is sprawled on an air mattress with Rima while the rest of the family lounges on thin bedding on the floor, swapping stories to try and keep spirits high and scrolling their phones for news.

“For the first time we can’t predict what Israel will do,” Ali said, adding that the family feels trapped by the sense of uncertainty. Rana and her daughters don’t know whether they should join her husband Ghassan in Oman, where he left for a better-paid teaching job a year and a half ago. That’s assuming they can get out; international carriers have suspended services and flights on Lebanon’s Middle East Airlines are fully booked.

The Hassans say they represent a minority willing to offer measured criticism of Hezbollah among the Shia families that until recently made Dahiyeh so bustling, filled with well known shawarma spots and cafes as well as a few spots where they knew people connected to the militant group would regard civilians with suspicion. For this reason, they requested to use a pseudonym for their family name, but their first names are genuine.

Advertisement
Israel-Hezbollah War Enters New Phase With IDF Announcing Ground Offensive
Volunteers erect plastic privacy sheeting in the room of a school that is sheltering people displaced by Israeli airstrikes, in Saida, on Oct. 1.Carl Court—Getty Images

When Hezbollah admitted reporters like me on Oct. 2 into Dahiyeh for a tour of the destruction following Israeli airstrikes, its rank-and-files tried to project re-emerging strength in the face of adversity. The few signs of life were small groups of young men riding around on motorbikes, sometimes shouting Nasrallah’s name—one holding a glossy poster of the late Hezbollah leader that adorned the towering piles of broken concrete and twisted metal next to the craters of what were once buildings. One was still smoldering from an airstrike that leveled it only hours prior.

Hezbollah spokesperson Mohammad Afif addressed Israeli forces from atop the rubble: “You have won a few rounds through your air raids and assassinations, but the war continues, and we will prevail.”


Since the last war between Hezbollah and Israel, in 2006, the group flooded once-impoverished Shia communities across Lebanon with investment. Hezbollah developed a powerful if opaque network of social support organizations and even a microfinance lender, finding ways to ensure its supporters retained some financial stability even as the entire Lebanese economy around them collapsed in 2019.

Many of these same supporters are now caught in makeshift shelters. At one darkened school in Dekwaneh, Ali Al Khansa, a man with a neat black beard and a tattoo of a lion adorning one arm, said he was overseeing 650 people crammed into 55 classrooms—with flooding in the bathrooms on every floor. Al Khansa abruptly shut down questions when I asked which organization was in charge of the shelter.

More Strikes In Beirut As Israel Launches Ground Offensive In Lebanon
Hezbollah’s chief spokesman, Mohammed Afif, speaks to the media at the site of an Israeli airstrike in Dahiyeh on Oct. 2.Carl Court—Getty Images

Outside in the darkness, 24-year-old Hussein Ibrahim and his 15-year-old friend Hassan Mushtaba, both from the southern suburbs, lounged on plastic chairs occasionally illuminated by the headlights of a passing car. Mushtaba wanted to believe that Nasrallah might still be alive, and could return to be “a savior for this war.” The two young men said they remained stuck sharing mattresses in a classroom, with school shut down and nothing to do all day.

The pair said they were resigned to staying in the shelter until the war ends. “Our families can’t find any houses to rent,” said Mushtaba. Ibrahim added: “And even if we do find one, it costs $2,000 or $3,000 a month, it’s ridiculous.”

Advertisement

Back at the Hassans’ bare apartment, they say they consider themselves lucky to have avoided a stay in a shelter. But they fear their next destination might not be quite as welcoming as the Christian-majority suburb of Hazmieh, worrying about what they see as a looming crisis across Lebanon as Shia flee for areas dominated by Sunnis or Christians.

More Strikes In Beirut As Israel Launches Ground Offensive In Lebanon
Smoke rises from a building destroyed by an Israeli airstrike as journalists and local residents visit during a press tour in Beirut, on Oct. 2.Daniel Carde—Getty Images

For Rana, Israel’s decision to launch a ground offensive into southern Lebanon on Oct. 1 will give Hezbollah a chance to flex its military muscle on home turf and swiftly bring their support base back—along with much of the rest of the country that remains on tenterhooks. The militant group continues to fire rockets into Israel in return and is mounting an effort to repel IDF forces from the steep hills of the south. At least eight Israeli troops have been killed in combat so far.

Rana said now is not the time to criticize Hezbollah. “They waited for the ground invasion because they know they’re powerful that way,” she added. “So now we can’t say we’re not with them, not these days.”

Ali believes that no matter the result of the battles in the south, Hezbollah will find a way to proclaim victory to shut down questions among Lebanese Shia about the group’s Iranian backing and criticisms about drawing the country into a war. “If Israel stops this war today, this will be sold as a victory, the battle on the borders that won the war,” he said.

“Whatever the scenario there will be a victory for Hezbollah,” said Ali. “But they can’t escape serious questions from within their own community.”

Advertisement

More from TIME

Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

News

New Stats Show Car Thieves Avoid Electric Cars—Tesla Among Least Stolen

Published

on

New Stats Show Car Thieves Avoid Electric Cars—Tesla Among Least Stolen

In fact, only one in 100,000 Tesla Model 3s was reported stolen.

The Tesla Model Y, along with the Model 3, ranks among the vehicles that car thieves avoid most.

On the other hand, traditional fuel-powered cars remain the primary targets.

The GMC Sierra is the most frequently stolen car, with 227 thefts per 100,000 vehicles, followed by the Chevrolet Silverado, which sees 96 thefts per 100,000.

Advertisement

Luxury brands such as Audi, BMW, and Mercedes are popular among thieves, and individual parts of these cars are also highly sought after.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Business

Swamp Notes — How the Middle East conflict is shaping the election

Published

on

This is an audio transcript of the FT News Briefing podcast episode: ‘Swamp Notes: How the Middle East conflict is shaping the election

Sonja Hutson
When it comes to conflict in the Middle East, President Joe Biden and vice-president Kamala Harris have repeatedly hit the same message.

Kamala Harris voice clip
Now is the time to get a hostage deal and a ceasefire deal done.

Sonja Hutson
But after nearly a year, the fighting continues and may be closer than ever to an all-out war.

Advertisement

[MUSIC PLAYING]

This is Swamp Notes, the weekly podcast from the FT News Briefing where we talk about all of the things happening in the 2024 US presidential election. I’m Sonja Hutson. And this week we’re asking: How could fighting in the Middle East shake up the US presidential race? Here with me to discuss is Felicia Schwartz. She’s the FT’s US foreign affairs and defense correspondent. Hi, Felicia.

Felicia Schwartz
Hello.

Sonja Hutson
And we’ve also got Derek Brower, the FT’s US political news editor. Hi, Derek.

Advertisement

Derek Brower
Hi, Sonja.

Sonja Hutson
So we are days away from October 7th, which will mark a year since the war in Israel, Gaza and the wider Middle East began. The Biden administration has tried to secure a ceasefire in Gaza and prevent a wider regional war. It has failed on both of those counts. Felicia, why has the administration proved so powerless to influence this conflict in the way that it wants to?

Felicia Schwartz
I think there are a few things at play here. I would say one, of course, this is a complicated situation because you’re dealing with a sovereign state, Israel, and a terrorist group in Gaza, Hamas. The US has leverage over its close ally, Israel. It’s working with partners in the Middle East that have leverage, to some extent, over Hamas because they support the group financially or, you know, have historical ties. But all that being said, throughout the process the US has, and President Biden in particular, who’s described himself as, you know, the most, one of the most Zionist, if not the most Zionist president, feels a deep connection to Israel, has not really been willing to use a ton of American leverage with Israel to get them to change its course, namely withholding shipments of American weapons, except in one case. So I think, you know, the US can’t want a deal more than Israel does. And I think at various turns it’s been clear that Israel doesn’t really want a deal.

Derek Brower
Netanyahu as well is a really difficult character for them to deal with. Let’s face it, he’s under pressure domestically himself. He can’t deliver sometimes what the Americans want for his own domestic reasons and for his own ambitions. So it’s really, it’s been a really, really thorny one. And the Biden administration has, at various times, seems failed the test.

Advertisement

Felicia Schwartz
If I could just add one thing, too. I used to be a reporter based in Israel. I think one of the things that’s come through to especially like talking to old kind of sources and colleagues who are still there is the news environment in Israel and what people are experiencing there is super, super intense and different. And they think that the US and, and others around the world, in Europe, etc., like totally kind of misread Israeli popular opinion on all of this because Netanyahu is very unpopular. There was this whole judicial overhaul thing that was happening before October 7th. He was potentially on his way out, many thought. But what’s happening in Lebanon, for example, right now, it’s polling really well, this feeling that, okay, the Israelis can kind of like finally have some shot at dealing with this like thorn in their side, this major threat, Hezbollah in the north. I just think that, you know, when the US is trying to pressure Israel, how this is playing domestically in Israel also weighs on its leaders. So it’s just a bit more nuanced and complicated in terms of where they can push, how they can push.

Sonja Hutson
So, Felicia, you mentioned one tool that they, that the Biden administration has not really used is withholding weapons, withholding military aid. Why is that? Like, is that the only tool that they have at their disposal to push Israel in the direction of de-escalation?

Felicia Schwartz
I think it’s definitely the most powerful tool. They could be a bit more forceful with Israel at the UN, not come to Israel’s defense there as much as Israel really cares about. But just just going back to this question of military aid. There’s been strong bipartisan support in the US for a strong defense partnership with Israel to the tune of, you know, almost $4bn a year at this point. And that aid is, is like largely devoted to preparing Israel for any sort of conflict with Iran, which is a, you know, considered Israel’s greatest threat in the region. And I think there is a fear whether you’re going to that kind of historical, kind of pro-Israel group of people. But even among those who are, you know, not as sure about the relationship, that while it would be a good idea in theory to use this powerful lever that the US has, the US also has a great interest in preventing conflict between Israel and Iran, which the US would be drawn into. And they fear that any, like serious withholding of weapons, any “daylight” between the US and Israel kind of invites Iran to, you know, seize on this weakness. And that is actually not good for the US.

Derek Brower
We can’t also avoid but talk about the kind of domestic calculations that are in every leading politician in the US when they think about Israel. And that is that there isn’t really a constituency that doesn’t support Israel. Not, not at the heights of the commanding heights of US power. There isn’t really a constituency that would back away from supporting Israel, especially after October 7th. And that’s even before you consider that we’re in an election year when those things are really, really important.

Advertisement

Sonja Hutson
What about this, you know, for example, the undecided movement in Michigan? Wouldn’t that be a constituency that would not want the US to be closer to Israel?

Derek Brower
I think it is. I think it is. And we should be very, I mean, we need to draw attention to them because it’s, there’s a big Arab-American community in Michigan. They already did vote in the primary, Democratic primary for this undecided vote to register their protest against Biden’s policies. I think the calculation that the Democratic Party is making right now and Harris’s camp is making is that there are more people on the other side of that issue. And so they can somewhat discount that. And they also have this very cynical message to those people, which is, well, really you think Trump is going to be better? And when you boil it down, Trump probably wouldn’t be necessarily better if your, you know, you have family who are living in Gaza. So . . . but that is, to be clear, that’s quite a cynical way to talk to people who are protesting about American foreign policy or who are suffering through their relatives in an area of the world being affected by all this violence. But, not to be too rough on the voters, but I think most voters probably just see chaos in the Middle East and they’re focusing on that stuff, they’re focusing on the cost of groceries. At the moment, they’re focusing on a hurricane that’s demolished parts of North Carolina, inflation, focusing on jobs. You know, there’s (plenty of) domestic, domestic, domestic stuff.

[MUSIC PLAYING]

[TECH TONIC TRAILER PLAYING]

Advertisement

Sonja Hutson
So, Felicia, I know that Derek said before the break that voters don’t really care as much about foreign policy as they do about domestic issues. But I do want to ask still, how would Trump versus Harris approach the situation in the Middle East?

Felicia Schwartz
Just starting with Trump. He has said things like, you know, this is really bad PR for Israel. It’s got to end. He was asked at a press conference when he was in New York about what’s going on in Lebanon. He said, you know, this has to end. It’s time to wind this down. So I think if Netanyahu is betting that a Trump administration might be super permissive on what they’re doing, I think that Trump has kind of also made clear that he’s got limited patience for what you might describe as Israeli adventurism in the Middle East. And I think that, you know, might help to explain why we’re seeing Israel take its shots now, because I think there’s some perception that Biden is a lame duck, that if Israel really needs defending, he will come to defend them. And, you know, Trump, for better or worse, can be unpredictable, right? And then on the Harris side, she has especially since she’s become the candidate for president and the tone was very different. She emphasized more Palestinian suffering and kind of empathy for what they’re experiencing in a way that President Biden, you know, can’t or hasn’t been able to do. I don’t really anticipate that that would be a big change. But I think at least, like tonally, things would be different.

Derek Brower
I think tonally is really important to stress, because it’s not like one of them is going to establish statehood for the Palestinians or fix the Middle East. They aren’t. (Yeah) I mean, this is not. Both of them would rather just not have to think about it, really. So we have to wait till the election’s gone and then, then the real strategizing will begin. At the moment, this foreign policy is just not something that wins votes.

Sonja Hutson
So, you know, we hear a lot about this idea of an October surprise in US politics, which is, you know, an event or revelation that shakes up the presidential race in the final weeks. Do you think the escalation of the conflict in the Middle East could be this year’s October surprise? Like, how important is this to the election?

Advertisement

Derek Brower
If it’s oil prices, that pushes up oil prices, then absolutely. Then we could have a series of October surprises. But I think the biggest threat and the one that will be keeping Harris’s team awake at night is if oil prices suddenly start rising, as they are right now, by the way, they, they’re up. And in fact translates to gasoline prices.

Felicia Schwartz
It feels like, you know, I’ve been covering this conflict now, it’s, in all of its twists and turns for a year. And, you know, every week or month, I think to myself, wow, we’re really high up the escalation ladder. This seems really dangerous. And I think right now this is the highest up the escalation ladder the US, Israel, Iran, Hezbollah have been. And I’m not sure how many more rungs there really are to go before this thing, you know, can’t be contained anymore. And one of the kind of things that the US is super nervous about is, you know, there are 40,000 troops in the Middle East right now. If any sort of Iranian proxy group, whether under direction from Iran, or Iran has lost control of these groups, decides to attack American forces and is successful, that could you know, (that would be huge) that would be huge. So far, there have been several, you know, several attacks. There were American service members who died in Jordan earlier this year. But generally speaking, the US has avoided casualties. But, you know, two weeks before the election, that could be a huge problem.

Derek Brower
I think it’s all a gift to Trump. It really is, because he can very successfully send out adverts into the swing states about how the world is in chaos. He’s doing that. That’s his message. World’s in chaos we don’t need. I think one of his adverts (inaudible) said we don’t need a TikTok star, referring to Harris and her kind of success in activating and energizing a bunch of younger people on TikTok. What they need is a powerful leader who other leaders around the world are scared of. So it’s a gift to him. And that’s why the Biden administration, and Harris, is so keen to talk about anything else. Remember the single most important thing for voters in this election is the cost of living in the US. If gasoline prices start to rise again because of some wars of which they had no control or Biden lost control of or whatever, somewhere else, that will be a message that Trump hammers relentlessly in the final weeks.

Sonja Hutson
All right. I want to thank our guests, Felicia Schwartz, the FT’s US foreign affairs and defense correspondent. Thanks, Felicia.

Advertisement

Felicia Schwartz
Thanks for having me.

Sonja Hutson
And Derek Brower, he’s our US political news editor. Thanks, Derek.

Derek Brower
Pleasure.

[MUSIC PLAYING]

Advertisement

Sonja Hutson
This was Swamp Notes, the US politics show from the FT News Briefing. If you want to sign up for the Swamp Notes newsletter, we’ve got a link to that in the show notes. Our show is mixed and produced by Ethan Plotkin. It’s also produced by Lauren Fedor and Marc Filippino. Special thanks to Pierre Nicholson. I’m your host, Sonja Hutson. Our executive producer is Topher Forhecz, and Cheryl Brumley is the FT’s global head of audio. Original music by Hannis Brown. Check back next week for more US political analysis from the Financial Times.

Source link

Continue Reading

News

Greg Davies’ sitcom is funnier than Inside No 9

Published

on

The Cleaner s3,04-10-2024,The Reunion,1,Wicky (Greg Davies),SHUK (Studio Hamburg UK),Jonathan Browning

If Romesh Ranganathan is ever inclined to look over his shoulder and worry about his position as Britain’s most ubiquitous TV comedian, he might see the 6ft 8in figure of Greg Davies looming on the horizon. Davies is currently not only hosting the umpteenth series of Taskmaster and soon to chair a new run of Never Mind the Buzzcocks, he is also now back on BBC One with his sitcom The Cleaner.

This is the third time around for Davies as crime-scene cleaner Paul “Wicky” Wickstead, the “technician” called upon to mop up after bloody crimes or untimely deaths. Since its first episode in 2021, the variety of these gory aftermaths has given Davies (who writes the show) the opportunity to create a new self-contained scenario each episode – and a chance to build an impressive guest cast list.

In the series three opener, the guests were Ben Willbond from Ghosts and the ever-busy Rosie Cavaliero (currently to be seen in Netflix’s Greek mythology mash-up Kaos).

Willbond played Justin, the owner of a huge mansion where a removal man had been crushed beneath a grand piano. Upon arrival at the bloody scene, Wicky mistook Justin for hired help and ranted about “a working man being called in by a rich man to clean up the blood of a working man”. Eventually he twigged that Justin was not only the owner of the swish mansion, but also an old school friend. And rather than being a brash “loadsamoney” type, Justin was modest and kind as he repeatedly pulled the rug from underneath Wicky’s assumptions.

Advertisement
The Cleaner s3,04-10-2024,The Reunion,1,Simon (Vaun Earl Norman) Wicky (Greg Davies) Justin (Ben Willbond) Danny (Zachary Cohen) Dicky (Naveed Khan) Marnie (Rosie Cavaliero),SHUK (Studio Hamburg UK),Jonathan Browning
Vaun Earl Norman as Simon, Greg Davies as Wicky, Ben Willbond as Justin, Zachry Cohen as Danny, Naveed Khan as Dicky and Rosie Cavaliero as Marnie (Photo: Jonathan Browning/BBC/SHUK)

In fact Wicky’s envy-tinged cynicism was challenged throughout a well-worked storyline that eventually involved a whole group of their old schoolfriends gathering at the mansion – including Cavaliero as Marnie, a cruise ship Pink impersonator. Her impromptu rendition of Pink’s “Try” reduced everyone but Wicky to tears. Wicky was also alone in not being delighted by Justin’s success, and his mounting incredulity at everyone’s generosity of spirit was the episode’s running gag. “She’s living the dream,” says Justin of Marnie. “Is she?” questions Wicky. “She’s a Pink impersonator on a boat.”

Just beneath the surface of the comedy lay a morality tale about the fickleness of memory and fortune. The old schoolmate who was remembered as the coolest of the gang and about whom the others joked that he would probably show up on horseback, arrived (okay, somewhat predictably) riding a mobility scooter. He had emphysema and an accompanying oxygen tank.

Wicky was meanwhile deflated by the gang recalling how they thought he would never go far in life. “I was always jealous of you,” Justin told Wicky sincerely. “You were always happy with the little things.” Ouch.

The Cleaner s3,04-10-2024,The Reunion,1,Wicky (Greg Davies),SHUK (Studio Hamburg UK),Jonathan Browning
Greg Davies as Wicky (Photo: Jonathan Browning/BBC/Studio Hamburg UK)

The Cleaner’s anthology format and twists in the tale (here involving a stolen David Bowie LP) are reminiscent of Inside No 9 (a likeness underlined by the presence of Steve Pemberton in a future episode). Inside No 9 may have been more furiously inventive, but I find The Cleaner much funnier. This is no small thanks to Davies’s trademark sarcasm (honed, I like to think, in his pre-comedy days as a schoolteacher) and amusing suffer-no-fools comic persona.

The first two series of The Cleaner were undeniably patchy, but having seen the opening three episodes of the third, it has finally found its stride. With larger casts (and therefore fewer two-handers), the stories can be more expansive, while the lightly applied backstory about Wicky’s relationship with police officer Ruth (Zita Sattar) gives the show a token sense of continuity.

But The Cleaner is essentially about throwing Wicky into a variety of bizarre situations and laughing as he struggles to deal with them. A bit like Taskmaster really.

Advertisement

‘The Cleaner’ continues next Friday at 9.30pm. All three series are streaming on BBC iPlayer

Source link

Continue Reading

News

The cosy Yorkshire-Iranian cafe is perfect for pain-free sugary indulgence

Published

on

The cosy Yorkshire-Iranian cafe is perfect for pain-free sugary indulgence


Middle-Eastern food, spiced tea, friendly staff and an outstanding atmosphere make Leila’s Kitchen an afternoon tonic

Source link

Continue Reading

News

Idaho state senator tells Native American candidate ‘go back where you came from’ in forum

Published

on

Idaho state senator tells Native American candidate 'go back where you came from' in forum

KENDRICK, Idaho (AP) — Tensions rose during a bipartisan forum this week after an audience question about discrimination reportedly led an Idaho state senator to angrily tell a Native American candidate to “go back where you came from.”

Republican Sen. Dan Foreman left the event early after the outburst and later denied making any racist comments in a Facebook post. He did not respond to a voice message from The Associated Press seeking comment.

Trish Carter-Goodheart, a Democratic candidate for the House District 6 seat and member of the Nez Perce Tribe, said the blowup left her shaken and thinking about security needs for future public events. It also forced some tough conversations with her two young children, Avery and Lavender, who were in attendance.

“Having conversations about racism with an 8-year-old and a 5-year-old is not something me and my husband Dane were prepared for,” Carter-Goodheart said Friday. “They’ve never seen a grown adult man have a meltdown like that. They were scared. I was scared.”

Advertisement

The event was held by Democratic and Republican precinct committee members from the small north-Idaho town of Kendrick on Monday night, The Lewiston Tribune reported. It was for House and Senate candidates from the local district, including Foreman; his Democratic opponent, Julia Parker: Republican Rep. Lori McCann; and her Democratic opponent, Carter-Goodheart.

About an hour into the event, someone asked a question about a state bill addressing discrimination. The candidates were each given two minutes to answer, and when it was Carter-Goodheart’s turn, she pushed back on earlier comments that suggested discrimination is not a major issue in Idaho.

She said state hate crime laws are weak, and noted that the neo-nazi group Aryan Nations made northern Idaho its home base for many years. She also talked about being the only candidate there who was a person of color.

“I pointed out that just because someone hasn’t personally experienced discrimination doesn’t mean it’s not happening,” she said. “I was making my statement, and then he shot up out of his seat and said, ‘I’m so sick of your liberal (expletive). Why don’t you go back to where you came from?’”

Advertisement

The Nez Perce Tribe has lived on the Columbia River Plateau in the Pacific Northwest for more than 11,500 years, including the area where Kendrick is located. The northern edge of its reservation, while only a small fraction of the tribe’s historical territory, is less than 10 miles (16 kilometers) from the Veterans of Foreign Wars hall where the forum was held.

“It was like slow motion,” Carter-Goodheart said. “I just remember thinking, ‘Go back to where you came from’? That’s within miles of where this forum is taking place. We have literal plots of land that are being leased out to family farms nearby.”

In his Facebook post, Foreman called the incident a “quintessential display of race-baiting” and said the Democratic attendees made personal attacks and “proclaimed Idaho to be a racist state.”

“Well, here is a news flash for the lefties out there. There is no systemic racism in America or Idaho,” Foreman said. “Idaho is a great state — the best in the Union!”

Advertisement

He then added an attack on supporters of abortion rights, saying: “And furthermore, it is immoral and against the law of God to kill unborn babies in the womb. You do not have any right to murder the unborn. There is no such thing as your self-proclaimed ‘Women’s Reproductive Rights.’ There is no such body of rights in the state or federal constitutions. And we don’t do designer rights in Idaho.”

During the exchange at the forum, Parker and McCann both said, Foreman stood up and yelled after Carter-Goodheart’s response.

“I stood up and faced (Foreman) and tried to defuse what was going on,” Parker said.

McCann said Carter-Goodheart’s description of the incident matched her own recollection.

Advertisement

“Her statement is accurate,” McCann told the Tribune. “(Carter-Goodheart) leaned over to me and said, ‘Where am I supposed to go?’”

The event continued for about 20 minutes after Foreman left. Carter-Goodheart said she found herself watching the only door, worried he would come back, and the female candidates checked on each other later.

“I really appreciate that about the people who are running, specifically Lori McCann,” she said. “She’s my elder and I appreciate her and her commitment to our community. We do have a big difference in our values and what we want to do for our communities, but she checked on me and I checked on her, and that was the right thing to do.”

More candidate forums are planned in coming weeks, Carter-Goodheart said. Organizers for an upcoming League of Women Voters event emailed Carter-Goodheart on Friday to say police would be there as a precaution, she said, and the Idaho Secretary of State’s Office offered guidance about security measures her campaign can pay for.

Advertisement

“We’ve been told, you know, it’s not a bad idea to get security,” she said. “And we need to have honest discussions about race and discrimination and the inequalities and disparities that exist not only in Idaho but across the country.”

Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Partners in life and art for 60 years

Published

on

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

On the evening of Armistice Day, November 11 1918, a bohemian young couple threw a party at their Chelsea home. The man of the house, 24-year-old Arthur Lett-Haines, was already on his second marriage and these high-spirited end-of-war festivities were about to blow that one apart too. Among the guests was a handsome artist called Cedric Morris and shortly afterwards the two men started a relationship that lasted the rest of their lives.

Portraits of the two currently hang side by side in Gainsborough’s House in Sudbury, Suffolk, where an exhibition is dedicated to their work. Both pictures are by Cedric Morris, the better known of the two. Lett-Haines, painted in 1925, is dressed in a fitted tweed jacket, his long handsome face vignetted against a map of Morocco; Morris in 1930, in his early 40s, with a fine head of wavy hair, his head tilted perhaps towards a mirror as his self-portrait takes shape. They are a compelling pair of early 20th-century aesthetes.

Advertisement
Black and white photo from the 1930s of two men in suits, one of whom is carrying a large parrot with his right hand and has a smaller bird on his left shoulder
Cedric Morris (left) and Arthur Lett-Haines, with Rubio the macaw, circa 1930 © Cedric Morris estate/ © Tate Archive

“I first became aware of Morris at the Chelsea Flower Show,” says London dealer Philip Mould, who will be showing one of the artist’s flower paintings, “September Diagram”, at Frieze Masters (October 9-13). “He was as much a horticulturalist as a painter, and someone was showing bearded irises that Morris had bred. After seeing those exquisite flowers, I really started to notice his work.” In “September Diagram”, a white vase is filled with an arrangement of yellow, blue and orange flowers in a Cubist interior. The painting, made in the 1940s, is typical of Morris’s best-known work.

The exhibition in Suffolk, though — Revealing Nature: The Art of Cedric Morris and Lett-Haines — shows a whole lot more. It begins in 1920, when they arrive in postwar Paris; the plan had been emigration to America: the second Mrs Lett-Haines sailed off alone. There, Morris was inspired by Pierre Bonnard’s passion for colour and refusal to follow the decorative rules, by Cézanne’s remembered landscapes.

Still life oil painting of blue, pink and yellow flowers in a white vase
‘September Diagram’ (early 1940s) by Cedric Morris © Philip Mould Gallery

His “Café la Rotonde” is a riposte to Renoir’s immersive bar scenes — Morris’s is all abrupt angles and almost infinite perspective. Like fellow British Modernists, he believed that contemporary art required both flat fields of colour and decoration, as well as texture, taking this to an extreme in “Experiment in Textures” (1923). A Cubist abstraction of forms and colours that radiate from the centre of the canvas, thickly spackled patches of paint create near three-dimensional forms.

For Lett-Haines, Surrealism was the thing and dominated his artistic career until his death in 1978. He had seen Giorgio de Chirico’s work in Italy and Wyndham Lewis’s in London and kept those memories close. Weird things happen in his paintings — blue dancing figures; a lilac horse that wouldn’t look out of place on a Kandinsky. Further into the exhibition, in “Vue d’une Fenetre” (1967), a cyclops-headed naked man is chased by powerful penis-like creatures. Brilliant white highlights streaked on the man’s orange flesh give the work an extraordinary, if overwrought, sense of movement.

Equally, for those familiar with Morris’s lovely flowers, his portraits will come as a surprise. Not so much unflattering as unsentimental, sitters including the writers Antonia White and Rosamond Lehmann stare wide-eyed in the headlights of his gaze. (Completed works tended not to enhance his relationships with his subjects.) He did not work from preliminary sketches but developed a process of starting with the inner corner of the sitter’s left eyebrow and working up and then down the face. Nearly 90 years later, their immediacy prevails.

Painting of a rugged rural landscape in southern Europe, with two buildings and some fir trees in the background, and a leaping black horse at the forefront
‘Italian Landscape’ (date unknown) by Arthur Lett-Haines © Courtesy Philip Mould Gallery

If you are wondering quite how they got away with all this unconventionality, of both lifestyle and output, the answer lies in Suffolk. In 1929, after criss-crossing the Channel, they took a lease on a property called The Pound in Higham, Suffolk, and shortly after left London for good. This allowed them to live in a rural bohemian bubble, resistant to society’s judgment of them, as well as prevailing London trends. But they were not entirely removed from social reality. Morris often returned to his native Wales and was appalled by the social injustice and deprivation he saw there, while early environmentalism eventually crept into his art. Outraged by the damaging use of pesticides, his 1960 “Landscape of Shame” depicts a field of dead birds, like corpses on a battlefield.

Assemblage of human figures, presented in blue or black silhouettes, like cave paintings, throwing various unusual shapes and positions (dancing, kneeling, stretching) alongside black silhouettes of a crouching leopard, a snake and a bird in flight
‘The Escape’ (1931) by Arthur Lett-Haines © Private Collection Courtesy Gainsborough’s House

Believing in the power of art and education, in 1937 Morris and Lett-Haines opened the East Anglian School for Painting and Drawing in Dedham, Essex. Lucian Freud became their most famous student; in 1940 Morris painted Freud, then in his late teens, as a full-lipped, wan youth, and apparently Freud loved it.

Once they moved to nearby Benton End, not far from Sudbury, in 1939 — after Freud had (possibly apocryphally) burnt down the school with a lazily extinguished cigarette — their best-known student was Maggi Hambling. “It was the opposite of my home life, which I suppose was pretty conventional,” says Hambling in the exhibition catalogue. “It seemed very exotic. It wasn’t just the cooking, it was the whole atmosphere.” But the cooking and the wine were exotic and very much Lett-Haines’s occupation. Cookery writer Elizabeth David was a regular visitor; Morris’s deliciously pastel-coloured painting of eggs (1944) became one of her book covers.

Advertisement
A primitive -looking sculpture made from bone and wood of a human figure, reduced to a series of spheres
‘Witch Fetish ’ (1962) by Arthur Lett-Haines — this portrait of his student Maggi Hambling is an example of Lett-Haines’s ‘humbles’, his small sculptures made from found materials, in this instance bone, wood and glass © Courtesy Gainsborough’s House

By the late 1960s, the school had run its course, allowing Lett-Haines to return to the making of art. Alongside his increasingly sexual watercolours is a series of mini-sculptures that he called Humbles or Weirdies. “I have Lett-Haines paintings,” says Philip Mould. “But it is these objets trouvés that are far and away his best work.” Collecting detritus on his ironing board — crab shells, chicken bones, pencil shavings, matchsticks — and drying it in the Aga, Lett-Haines collaged these bits and pieces into fantastical forms. Otherworldly beings dredged from the depths of imagination, they are the apotheosis of the surreal. And Mould is right, they are his best work.

To November 3, gainsborough.org

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 WordupNews.com