Connect with us

News

It’s Time to Tighten Enforcement of Iran Oil Sanctions

Published

on

It’s Time to Tighten Enforcement of Iran Oil Sanctions

The unprecedented significant ballistic missile attacks by Iran against Israel Tuesday represent a “significant escalation,” as National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan said in the moments after the attack.

Even though the attack was defeated with all missiles shot down, no deaths, and little damage to strategic facilities, there must be a direct response to Iran’s attack. The Ayatollah has long proclaimed, “the perpetual subject of Iran is the elimination of Israel from the region.” Today’s attacks show that Iran is not just supporting terrorist proxy groups such as Hezbollah and Hamas, but now directly, attacking Israel.

We don’t know how Israel will respond as a sovereign nation under attack. We do know that Israel will not allow such an unprecedented attack to go unanswered. Israel has a bevy of military options, such as targeting Iran’s nuclear infrastructure as well as Iranian oil facilities and refineries on Khark Island. But how Israel chooses to respond may be influenced by what the U.S. does to show that it will impose a price on Iran for this attack. One serious U.S. response would be to choke off Iran’s ability to fund future attack through tighter enforcement of oil sanctions on Iran.

Oil sales are critical for Iran, with exports representing up to 70% of the government’s revenues. Iran has been reaping windfall profits from near-record oil production this year, with production doubling from less than 2 million barrels per day in 2019 to nearly 4 million barrels per day now, and with oil exports increasing from practically zero to nearly 2 million barrels per day. This represents a $100 billion increase in revenues for use by the Ayatollah to attack Israel and jeopardize U.S. national security. Iran has been able to export near-record amounts of oil despite technically remaining under U.S. sanctions—as the Biden Administration has failed to enforce the Iranian oil sanctions with the same effect as its predecessors.

Advertisement

It can be done: Iranian oil sanctions have been demonstrated to work well before. During the Trump Administration, under the leadership of Abraham Accords architect Jared Kushner and Iran Special Envoy Brian Hook, a heightened focus on U.S. government enforcement reduced the volume of Iranian oil exports by 95%, from 2.5 million barrels a day in 2018 to a low of 70,000 barrels a day in 2020, reducing Iranian oil revenues by $50 billion.

Clearly, the lack of tight enforcement of oil sanctions reflects a lack of political will, not a lack of technical enforcement ability. The Biden Administration could easily tighten the screws once again by returning to the pre-2021 approach, of having teams from across the federal government tracking every illicit Iranian oil transfer and working with European allies to seize countless Iran oil tankers, with even senior State Department officials directly, personally emailing ship captains.

The Biden Administration has long feared that enforcing Iranian oil sanctions more stringently will drive up global oil prices. But this fear does not represent the reality of global oil market dynamics. First, Iran represents a tiny fraction of Middle East oil production—only around 12.5% of regional production and nearly four times smaller than Saudi Arabia’s. Second, oil prices actually went down from 2018 to 2019 with supply increasing, as U.S. enforcement of Iranian oil sanctions tightened, partially because the Gulf countries, which similarly believe Iran is a threat to regional peace, offset the loss of Iranian oil by increasing their own production. With record “spare capacity” sitting on the sidelines, including Saudi pumping a third less oil than it did during the Trump era, Iranian oil production can easily be replaced once again.

For too long, too many policymakers have favored appeasement of Iran, tolerating Iran’s murderous terrorism. But the reality is that while Iran has rarely won a war, it tends to win at the diplomatic negotiating table. Constructive backchanneling with Iran has failed, and it is past time to cut the spigots of windfall oil revenues funding Iran’s military attacks on Israel. The US must move to re-enforce Iranian oil sanctions more stringently once again.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Travel

Louvre Hotels Group to offer 1,000 more keys in Saudi Arabia by 2027

Published

on

Louvre Hotels Group to offer 1,000 more keys in Saudi Arabia by 2027

Louvre Hotels Group has announced plans to launch 1,000 additional keys in the kingdom of Saudi Arabia within the next three years

Continue reading Louvre Hotels Group to offer 1,000 more keys in Saudi Arabia by 2027 at Business Traveller.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Arsenal made it look easy against PSG

Published

on

LONDON, ENGLAND - OCTOBER 01: Bukayo Saka of Arsenal celebrates scoring his team's second goal during the UEFA Champions League 2024/25 League Phase MD2 match between Arsenal FC and Paris Saint-Germain at Emirates Stadium on October 01, 2024 in London, England. (Photo by Ryan Pierse - UEFA/UEFA via Getty Images)

Arsenal 2-0 PSG (Havertz 20′, Saka 35′)

EMIRATES — This was supposed to be one of the hard ones for Arsenal.

In the revamped Champions League, where the Swiss model of randomised fixtures promises to make games more competitive than ever before, Paris Saint-Germain represented a real test of how far the Gunners have come after two years of title-chasing in the Premier League.

If ever there was a moment that it felt like they were not only vying ambitiously for a seat back at the top table of European football, but sitting firmly in place, it was this result.

Advertisement

PSG were unbeaten on arrival at the Emirates in a run that included six wins and one draw – with an average of three goals scored per game. They were two down in north London in 35 minutes.

Arsenal looked organised, composed, possessing almost an inner self-belief that the result was assured provided they stuck to another of Mikel Arteta’s game plans. They were aggressive off the ball, incisive on it.

The silky slick move on in the 51st minute, a combination of clipped passes keeping the ball in the air that ended with Kai Havertz teeing the ball up for Gabriel Martinelli to volley goalwards, was not only deserving of a goal – it produced a fine save – but was indicative of a side in total control of their senses.

Bukayo Saka had fans on their feet after nine minutes, leaving their seats as he cut inside in what has become a trademark move, straining for a better a look as he curled the ball towards the far corner and narrowly missed the post.

Advertisement

They scored the opening goal on 20 minutes. Havertz and Leandro Trossard played as revolving centre-forwards, one dropping back, the other further forward, confusing the PSG centre-backs, Marquinhos and Willian Pacho.

The Arsenal pair combined for the goal: Trossard deeper this time, cutting inside and sending a delightful in-swinging cross into the area of nightmares for goalkeepers. Should they come? Should they wait?

The last thing a goalkeeper wants in that area is a six-foot-two forward but in galloped Havertz between the centre-backs, beating Gianluigi Donnarumma’s fist to the ball and cushioning the ball around the Italian with his head.

PSG, for their part, reminded Arsenal they were still there. Nuno Mendes hit the post and when Achraf Hakimi was slipped in behind Riccardo Calafiori the Italian struggled to catch up but David Raya saved with his legs.

Advertisement

But with the home crowd going a little flat, Gabriel strongly held off Warren Zaire-Emery to earn a goal kick and spark a rise back out of them, and the second goal followed two minutes later.

From a free-kick wide on the right, Saka sent in a hopeful low in-swinging ball, finding another of those devilish areas. Three Arsenal players missed it, but so did Donnarumma, who could only flap his hands as the ball bounced him and in.

Another nightmare delivery on a nightmare of a night for the PSG goalkeeper.

And the thing is, Arsenal are probably about to get better. With Martin Odegaard out since the international break and Mikel Merino out with an injured shoulder since signing for £27.4m from Real Sociedad, they have been missing two of three key central midfielders. Merino came on in the second half, easing back in.

Advertisement

Even without them there is such a strong core to this side. If teams get through Declan Rice, which rarely happens, they hit a brick wall of William Saliba and Gabriel. If that fails, which it rarely does, Raya is fast becoming the finest goalkeeper in the game.

It’s becoming hard to find a weakness anywhere.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Business

Comparing tax to Mafia ‘pizzu’ was inappropriate

Published

on

Banker all-nighters create productivity paradox

The comparison that your FT Money columnist Moira O’Neill draws between the Mafia “pizzu” and tax is inappropriate and wrong (“Should you ‘fill to the max’ on tax-free allowances?”, Opinion, FT Money, FT Weekend, September 21).

Pizzu is an illegal payment extracted by organised crime groups, through threats of violence or intimidation, in exchange for “protection”. Taxation, on the other hand, is at the core of the social contract between the state and its citizens and is based on governance and accountability.

In modern democracies, taxes are legally enforced contributions to fund public services such as healthcare, education, infrastructure, defence and social welfare. Transparency and accountability mechanisms exist to prevent misuse of tax revenues.

The level of taxation — and public expenditure — depends on voters’ preferences, and tax rates and spending are typically decided by elected representatives. Citizens can vote, engage in protest, or influence policy to change how taxes are levied or spent.

Advertisement

Some societies may prefer, for instance, to restrict the range of public services in exchange for a lower level of taxation and let services such as healthcare to be mostly privately funded.

Modern democracies began with the citizens’ demand to have a say on how much they pay and to no longer be burdened with taxes decided elsewhere — no more taxation without representation.

Taxes are often perceived as unfair, but drawing a comparison with the pizzu confuses purposes, context and legality — or lack of it. Above all, it overlooks the fundamental role of democracy, governance, law, and the provision of public services and collective goods that taxes support.

Paola Subacchi
Professor of Economics, Sciences Po, Paris and Essential Economics, London W1, UK

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

News

How much parking will cost in Kirklees car parks and permit zones in latest council plans

Published

on

How much parking will cost in Kirklees car parks and permit zones in latest council plans


New plans have been put forward after controversial proposals to scrap free parking met with backlash

Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Letter: Politicians are ‘Fachidioten’

Published

on

Banker all-nighters create productivity paradox

Just a small feedback on Janan Ganesh’s piece on “The end of the popular politician” (Opinion, September 26).

It may well be that a spoilt vote reflects a general dissatisfaction with politicians. But I would rather say that voters can’t be fooled so easily any more. The requirements of a politician have not changed much for at least half a century. Almost by definition, politicians of western democracies are amateurs. Even worse, politicians refuse to raise the standards of their profession.

Singapore is a pretty good example of how professional politicians can do a much better job than their western “amateur” counterparts. Or let me use a word from my German mother tongue — Fachidiot — which means a one-track specialised idiot, who is an expert in his or her field but takes a blinkered approach to multi-faceted problems, what you might call an expert idiot. That describes our politicians.

What the west needs is minimum standards for politicians, which are generally accepted for the profession. When an employer searches for a medical doctor, why would we look for qualifications fitting a carpenter?

Advertisement

We demand licences for drivers, lawyers, doctors and many other professions. By contrast, any idiot can be a politician!

Matthias Abold
Chumphon, Thailand

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

MAGA World Goes Into a Tailspin After CBS Cuts JD’s Mic

Published

on

The Daily Beast

“HOW DARE YOU.”

“DISGRACEFUL.”

“Unreal.”

A fact-checking flashpoint that spiraled into a full-on mic cut at the vice presidential debate set right-wing tempers ablaze on Tuesday night, with MAGA World denizens tweeting out their gormless outrage that CBS News had had the nerve to silence J.D. Vance.

Advertisement

After moderator Margaret Brennan offered Vance, who’d been speaking about illegal immigration, a correction that a large swath of the Haitian community in Springfield, Ohio was in the country legally, Vance talked over her.

As the Republican nominee tried to get into the minutiae of the documentation required to come into the United States, the network cut off both candidates’ microphones.

“Gentlemen, the audience can’t hear you because your mics have been cut,” Brennan said, smiling tightly. “Thank you for explaining the legal process.”

Vance seemed miffed, scoffing that “the rules were you guys weren’t going to fact-check.” (CBS set a ground rule that the mics would be cut should the crosstalk grow too heated.)

Advertisement

But that was nothing compared to the nuclear meltdown that had already been triggered online.

“F you CBS – how DARE YOU,” commentator Megyn Kelly tweeted.

“The CBS moderators just MUTED JD Vance’s mic as he called them out for their lies about Kamala Harris’ open border policies,” Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) inveighed. “DISGRACEFUL.”

“.@JDVance putting these broads in their place over the Haitian migrants in Ohio,” hanger-on Laura Loomer remarked. “Now they are muting his mic. Unreal.”

Ann Coulter, the conservative media pundit and unwitting recipient of the harshest roast of all time, responded to journalist Mickey Kaus, who had tweeted that Vance had just missed an opportunity to trash Sen. James Lankford (R-OK)’s border bill.

“The bimbo moderators wouldn’t have let him,” she spat.

Even former President Donald Trump, live-posting through the debate over on Truth Social, got in on the fun.

Advertisement

“Maragret Brennan just lied again about the ILLEGAL MIGRANTS let into our Country by lyin’ Kamala Harris, and then she cut off JD’s mic to stop him from correcting her!” he wrote.

Read more at The Daily Beast.

Get the Daily Beast’s biggest scoops and scandals delivered right to your inbox. Sign up now.

Stay informed and gain unlimited access to the Daily Beast’s unmatched reporting. Subscribe now.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 WordupNews.com