Connect with us

News

Michigan State Troopers caught attempting to plant drugs in bogus DUI arrest- alleges lawsuit. 

Published

on

Michigan State Troopers caught attempting to plant drugs in bogus DUI arrest- alleges lawsuit. 
YouTube video

Dakaria Larriett was driving a friend home at 3:00 in the morning when he saw the flash of a Michigan State Trooper’s siren. Although Larriett was stone-cold sober, he soon discovered this would not be enough to protect him. After accusing him of a minor traffic violation, Officer George Kanyuh began to speculate over Larriett’s sobriety. A lawsuit brought by Larriett alleges that, after subjecting Larriett to a series of sobriety field tests, Kanyuh spent over two minutes unsuccessfully looking for drugs in his patrol car to use as planted evidence against Larriett. Once this failed, Kanyuh and his partner, Matthew Okaiye, took Larriett into custody and forced him to endure even more humiliating ordeals at the police station—including requiring him to defecate in front of them. It’s only thanks to body camera footage that the truth of this incident was revealed, but there are countless cases of similar behavior by police across the country which has never come to light. Taya Graham and Stephen Janis of Police Accountability Report review the case and its implications, speaking directly with Dakaria Larriett about his ordeal.

Written by: Stephen Janis
Production: Stephen Janis, Taya Graham
Post-Production: Adam Coley


Transcript

The following is a rushed transcript and may contain errors. A proofread version will be made available as soon as possible.

Taya Graham:

Hello, my name is Taya Graham, and welcome to the Police Accountability Report. As I always make clear, this show has a single purpose, holding the politically powerful institution of policing accountable. And to do so, we don’t just focus on the bad behavior of individual cops. Instead, we examine the system that makes bad policing possible.

And today we’ll achieve that goal by showing you this video of a bogus DUI stop that led to the false arrest of a man who is still suffering from the consequences of it. A harrowing encounter with Michigan State troopers that led to questionable charges, a humiliating search, and allegations of an officer attempting to plant drugs. But, it also calls into question the whole idea of how DUIs are investigated, all of which we will break down for you as we unpack yet another problematic use of police powers.

Advertisement

And I want you watching to know that if you have video evidence of police misconduct, please email it to us privately at par@therealnews.com or reach out to me on Facebook or Twitter @TayasBaltimore and we might be able to investigate for you and please like, share, and comment on our videos. It helps us get the word out and it can even help our guests. And of course, you know I read your comments and appreciate them. You see those little hearts I give out down there. And I’ve even started doing a comment of the week to show you all how much I really appreciate your thoughts and to show off what a great community we have.

And of course, we have to thank our corporate sponsor. Oh wait, that’s right, we don’t run ads or take corporate dollars, but you can donate below, and we have a Patreon Accountability Report, so if you feel inspired to donate, please do, because we don’t run ads or take those corporate dollars, so anything you can spare is truly appreciated. All right, we’ve gotten that out of the way.

Now, there is no crime more potentially destructive or dangerous than driving while drunk here at the Police Accountability Report, we support efforts by law enforcement to prevent it. However, we have also noticed a troubling trend, as we’ve reported, on questionable DUI arrests across the country. Sometimes it seems that police are overly eager to charge someone driving while drunk, overreach that can have devastating consequences for the people subject to it.

And no DUI stop embodies this problem more than the video I’m showing you right now. It depicts the highly-suspect arrest of a Michigan man who’s being put through a grueling field sobriety test. Despite passing every facet of it, he still ended up in handcuffs, but that was only the beginning of his ordeal. That’s because even after his detainment, police weren’t done subjecting him to the cruelty and violations of our criminal justice system. The details of which we will share with you shortly, but first, the arrest itself.

Advertisement

This story starts in Benton Harbor, Michigan in April of 2024. There, Dakarai Larriett was driving a friend home at 3:00 A.M. when he was pulled over by a Michigan State trooper for, ostensibly, not coming to a stop for a flashing red light. An accusation Dakarai firmly denies. However, from the beginning, the officer began accusing him of being drunk. Take a look.

Kanyuh:

Hey, how you doing?

Dakarai Larriette:

Advertisement

Good.

Kanyuh:

Good. You got a license on you?

Dakarai Larriette:

Advertisement

Yep, it’s in my bag.

Kanyuh:

In the back?

Dakarai Larriette:

Advertisement

In my bag.

Kanyuh:

Oh, go for it. Yeah, the reason I’m sobbing, there’s two red lights there. Make sure you come to a complete stop.

Thank you.

Advertisement

Where you coming from?

Dakarai Larriette:

St. Joe’s.

Kanyuh:

Advertisement

St. Joe? Where are you trying to get?

Dakarai Larriette:

I’m dropping him off right here.

Kanyuh:

Advertisement

Oh, okay. This address here? With the fence?

Okay. Do you have any paperwork for the vehicle?

Dakarai Larriette:

I’m sorry?

Advertisement

Kanyuh:

Any paperwork for the vehicle like registration insurance?

Dakarai Larriette:

I do.

Advertisement

Kanyuh:

Can I see that please?

Dakarai Larriette:

Sure.

Advertisement

Kanyuh:

Does alcohol impact your ability to drive today?

Dakarai Larriette:

[inaudible 00:03:51]

Advertisement

Kanyuh:

Okay. When was your last drink? Has it been at least two hours?

Dakarai Larriette:

Yes.

Advertisement

Kanyuh:

Okay. All right. Two hours you said? What was it specifically? Smelling fruity and a little bit of something else on you.

Dakarai Larriette:

There was no alcohol in on me.

Advertisement

Kanyuh:

I can smell it on your breath. Something fruity like what were you drinking?

Dakarai Larriette:

There was no alcohol in here.

Advertisement

Kanyuh:

No? But it’s been at least two hours.

Dakarai Larriette:

There’s no alcohol on me.

Advertisement

Kanyuh:

All righty. Just hop out for me. I’m going to verify, okay.

Taya Graham:

Now Dakarai again politely denied the accusations. As you can see, he’s calm and collected in his answers. The officer did not accuse him of driving recklessly or swerving, instead, he simply ordered Dakarai to get out of the car as he continued to question him. Let’s watch.

Advertisement

Kanyuh:

You do the open carry for protection at all or no?

Dakarai Larriette:

I don’t.

Advertisement

Kanyuh:

Okay. You should, it’s kind of crazy out here. Right back this way for me.

Why are you changing your story on that? I said two hours, and then I said I smell it on your breath, and now you’re denying it at all that’s suspicious to me.

Dakarai Larriette:

Advertisement

I am not commenting any further. I’m not [inaudible 00:05:13].

Kanyuh:

Okay.

Taya Graham:

Advertisement

And so, it appears that based on a “fruity” smell and Dakarai invoking his right not to answer questions, the officer begins what can only be called the most potentially treacherous aspect of American DUI enforcement: the field sobriety test.

Now I want to make something clear before we watch, field sobriety tests are not as scientific as they’re portrayed. The six studies cited by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration to justify the use of these tests were not peer reviewed, and reveal a harrowing number of false positives anywhere between 20-40% of the time. Nevertheless, it has become a key tool of law enforcement even though it is important to note that you can refuse to take it. Still, unfortunately, Dakarai is put through a grueling battery of examinations starting with the horizontal gaze test.

Kanyuh:

And then arms down at your side like a pencil dive. Yep, just remain like that and then don’t move until I tie you move. Okay? Do you understand those instructions?

Advertisement

Dakarai Larriette:

Yes.

Kanyuh:

Okay. Is there any reason why you couldn’t stand there like that?

Advertisement

Dakarai Larriette:

No.

Kanyuh:

Okay. Weird question I got to ask you. I’m going to check your eyes. What I want you to do is just follow the tip of my finger with only your eyes. Do not move your head, okay? Do you understand?

Advertisement

Is there any reason you couldn’t do that?

Dakarai Larriette:

No.

Kanyuh:

Advertisement

Okay. Are you wearing contacts right now?

Dakarai Larriette:

I am.

Kanyuh:

Advertisement

Okay. Same thing, just keep following with your eyes and only your eyes. You got to rub your eyes or something?

Dakarai Larriette:

No.

Kanyuh:

Advertisement

Okay. You’re just not tracking it.

How long you had your contacts in?

Dakarai Larriette:

An hour or so.

Advertisement

Kanyuh:

Hour or so? So they’re not dry or anything?

Dakarai Larriette:

They’re fine.

Advertisement

Kanyuh:

They’re fine? Okay.

Taya Graham:

Next, the officer asked Dakarai to do the so-called Walk-and-Turn Test, an assessment, by the way, that can generate false positives 30% of the time and, truthfully, isn’t easy. Take a look.

Advertisement

Kanyuh:

Good.

See this line here?

Yeah, we can use this line.

Advertisement

See this crack? Go ahead and stand on the crack with your left foot on it, and then your right foot in front of it, heel to toe. See how mine are heel to toe? Go ahead and do so.

When I tell you to do so, you’re going to take nine steps heel to toe, when you get to your ninth step, I want you to turn, taking a series of small steps, come nine heel-to-toe steps, back up that line, all the way to nine. It’s important you’re keeping your arms down at your side, you’re looking down at your toe, and you’re counting out loud. When you begin the test, don’t stop until you’ve completed it.

Taya Graham:

Now, even though he performs the test meticulously, the officer persists in putting him through even more stressful examinations. At this point it seems crystal clear Dakarai has no problem with doing exactly what the officer demands, but he still makes him continue.

Advertisement

Kanyuh:

Do you understand those instructions?

Dakarai Larriette:

Yes.

Advertisement

Kanyuh:

Okay. Is there any reason why you couldn’t do that?

Dakarai Larriette:

I don’t think so.

Advertisement

Kanyuh:

Okay, I’ll stand back here, and whenever you’re ready, you may begin.

Dakarai Larriette:

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 3, 9.

Advertisement

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9.

Kanyuh:

Good.

Taya Graham:

Advertisement

But now, the officer ups the ante. That’s because even though Dakarai passes the so-called Standard Field Sobriety test endorsed by the National Highway Traffic and Safety Administration, the officer turns to a battery of non-standard tests that are even less scientific, raising even more questions about the process that includes asking him to recite the alphabet. Let’s listen.

Kanyuh:

So you know your alphabet? Okay, I’m not having you say it backwards, that’s not a real thing. Can you say your alphabet starting at A as in Adam, stop at R as in Robert, A to R. Do you have that ability? Okay, go ahead and do so.

Dakarai Larriette:

Advertisement

A-B-C-D-E-F-G-H-I-J-K-L-M-N-O-P-Q-R.

Kanyuh:

Good.

Taya Graham:

Advertisement

Then, venturing further into non-scientific territory, he asked Dakarai to count backwards.

Kanyuh:

Starting at the number 99. Can you count backwards from 99 to 81?

Dakarai Larriette:

Advertisement

99, 98, 97, 96, 95, 94, 93, 92, 91, 90…

Taya Graham:

But Officer Kanyuh is not done, not hardly, because even though Dakarai passed each test flawlessly, the troop returns to another questionable exam, the One-Leg Stand Test, which once again has been accused of being non-scientific and inaccurate, 30% of the time.

Kanyuh:

Advertisement

I want you to stand just like this again, the same drama we’ve always been doing. Good. Remain like that and then don’t move ’til how to move, okay? Do you understand these instructions? Okay. Is there any reason why you couldn’t do this? No? Okay. Whenever you’re ready, you may begin.

Dakarai Larriette:

[inaudible 00:10:22].

Kanyuh:

Advertisement

Remember to look down at that toe.

Dakarai Larriette:

[inaudible 00:10:36].

Taya Graham:

Advertisement

Now as each of these tests unfold one after another, I want you to think about how Dakarai is feeling.

First, he’s flawlessly following orders. One can only imagine how gut-wrenching it is taking these vague, imprecise, if not scientifically questionable, tests with your life hanging in the balance.

And even though he is clearly under duress, he is respectful and steady, and he is obviously not drunk and not high, and yet the endurance test continues with another scientifically-sketchy request that requires him to decide when 30 seconds has elapsed. Just watch.

Kanyuh:

Advertisement

Go ahead and just take one step forward. Good. Hit same heels and toes touching just like this. Arms down at the side. When I tell you to do so, I want you to tilt your head back, close your eyes, and when you believe 30 seconds has passed, bring your head forward and say stop. Okay. Does that…

Dakarai Larriette:

Closing my eyes?

Kanyuh:

Advertisement

Yep, closing your eyes. When you believe 30 seconds has passed, look forward, say stop. You understand the instructions?

Dakarai Larriette:

I think so.

Kanyuh:

Advertisement

Okay. Is there any reason why you couldn’t do that?

Dakarai Larriette:

No.

Kanyuh:

Advertisement

Okay. Whenever you’re ready, begin.

How much time was that?

Dakarai Larriette:

About 30 seconds.

Advertisement

Kanyuh:

And then how’d you get there?

Dakarai Larriette:

I’m sorry?

Advertisement

Kanyuh:

Did you count 1, 2, 3? You didn’t do one Mississippi or anything like that?

Dakarai Larriette:

No.

Advertisement

Kanyuh:

Okay. So just 1, 2, 3. Okay, cool.

Taya Graham:

And there’s more. Yes, there’s more. The officer, not satisfied, veers into another non-standard test known as the Finger-to-Nose test, which again is non-standard and is not an accepted test from the National Highway Safety Administration. Still the officer persists. Just look.

Advertisement

Kanyuh:

You’re going to keep your hands down to your side, and I’m going to call out an arm, so if I say left, you’re going to take your left arm… This is the tip of your finger. This is the tip of your finger and this is the pad of your finger. Okay? This is the difference. I want you to take the tip of your finger, the tip and touch, the tip of your nose.

Go ahead and tilt your head back and close your eyes. Left, right, left, right, right, left. Good. You follow me.

Taya Graham:

Advertisement

And finally, the officer asks Dakarai to incriminate himself, requiring that he assess his own drunkenness even though it appears he has passed every single test thrown at him. Just listen.

Kanyuh:

On a scale of zero to five, as far as five being unsafe to operate a motor vehicles the most drunk and high you’ve ever been, and then zero being sober, where are you at right now?

Dakarai Larriette:

Advertisement

I don’t know. Is that relevant? I really know what you’re talking about.

Kanyuh:

It is relevant, but if you don’t want to answer it, I don’t care.

Dakarai Larriette:

Advertisement

I have not had any alcohol.

Kanyuh:

Not had any alcohol.

Dakarai Larriette:

Advertisement

I have not.

Kanyuh:

Okay. Now how about marijuana? Did you have had that?

Dakarai Larriette:

Advertisement

Excuse me?

Kanyuh:

Marijuana?

Dakarai Larriette:

Advertisement

I’m sorry, I didn’t understand. What did you say?

Kanyuh:

I said how about marijuana?

Dakarai Larriette:

Advertisement

No.

Kanyuh:

No marijuana? No.

Dakarai Larriette:

Advertisement

Okay. You want to hang out right here for me?

Taya Graham:

Now, apparently the officer has already reached his conclusion about Dakarai’s condition. You can listen here as he discusses it with another trooper who just arrived on the scene. It’s also a rare glimpse into how officers interpret a field sobriety test. Even if, for all intents and purposes, you passed, the point is it seems that no one passes.

Kanyuh:

Advertisement

Booze and marijuana. His eyelids fluttered worse than that guy’s.

Okaiye:

He’s got neck pulsation too.

Kanyuh:

Advertisement

He had numerous clues on the walk and turn like crazy

Okaiye:

I didn’t catch the standard, but you said walk and turn one night thing and all that?

Kanyuh:

Advertisement

One night stand was the wobbles [inaudible 00:14:52] was 23 seconds, fly with flutter, sways. Finger-nose. Terrible.

Okaiye:

What’s all that? Romberg?

Kanyuh:

Advertisement

99 to 81, he stopped at 89. So even his mental, short-term memory. He’s going to refuse and then search warrant, but…

Okaiye:

He’s showing?

Kanyuh:

Advertisement

In the driving.

Okaiye:

What do you think you? You think is just number [inaudible 00:15:14]?

Kanyuh:

Advertisement

I think he’s got a medication he’s not telling…

Okaiye:

He’s got medication and I’m guessing it’s a medication for… He may be… I think he’s got a medication for that. And with that would be consuming substances like THC, marijuana, alcohol, whatever. You know what that does.

Kanyuh:

Advertisement

Yeah.

Okaiye:

Explaining what you’re seeing.

Kanyuh:

Advertisement

His driving behavior, I saw lack of smooth pursuit, but he wasn’t very good at following my finger.

Okaiye:

Lack of smooth, and divided attention, abilities affected. Whenever you speak with him, he’s looking away and moving his head, so I think it’s a combination of THC for sure. I didn’t really evaluate him, but you can definitely see impairment for THC. And then I think in his medications, describing medications affecting it, too. It’s performing effects of I’m going to take them,

Taya Graham:

Advertisement

But let me play some audio for you here that brought to Kari a lot of concern. Apparently at roughly 3:25, officer Kanyuh can be seen on body cam rifling through the trunk of his squad car for about two minutes, and then the video goes dark. During those moments. Officer Okaiye seems to say, “Drugs?” And Officer Kanyuh responds, “I don’t think I have any, I had a stash in your somewhere, but I don’t know where it’s at.”

But you take a listen and judge for yourself.

Kanyuh:

I don’t think I have any.

Advertisement

Okaiye:

[inaudible 00:16:59] in the box.

Kanyuh:

Yeah, I had a stash in here somewhere. I don’t even know where it’s at. [inaudible 00:17:11] Don’t know why he thought, but yeah, I’m assuming weed and alcohol.

Advertisement

Taya Graham:

Now I am unfamiliar with any part of a field sobriety test where an officer needs to search for a stash in his own patrol car, but perhaps Michigan State troopers have a unique investigative technique.

And I do understand, as I said before, that drunk driving is incredibly destructive, but it’s equally pernicious to accuse someone of it who’s ostensibly not guilty, and perhaps even worse is to fabricate a crime to make the innocent guilty. Remember, our system is designed to protect the innocent, and yet those safeguards fail as you what the officer does next when he says, “I’m going to take him.”

Kanyuh:

Advertisement

Is it Dakarai? Am I saying that wrong?

Dakarai Larriette:

It’s Dakarai.

Kanyuh:

Advertisement

Darkarai, I told you the reason for the stop was there’s two red lights. Okay? I know they’re flashing, but that’s still, you have to treat it like a stop sign at nighttime. At midnight the lights turn from red to flashing. Flashing red still means stop.

I walk up to the car and I can smell alcohol, whether it’s you or your passenger, that’s why I asked the question, “Have you been drinking?” To which you responded it was two hours ago, and then you denied drinking alcohol.

Dakarai Larriette:

Actually what you stated was, “Was it at least two hours?” Something like that. You kind of inferred something, but no, I’ve not been drinking.

Advertisement

Kanyuh:

Well, I didn’t mean to give you a leading question.

Dakarai Larriette:

No, but to be clear, I have not been drinking.

Advertisement

Kanyuh:

You haven’t had any alcohol?

Dakarai Larriette:

I did stop. Correct. And I did stop at each of those lights.

Advertisement

Kanyuh:

I do have an on camera.

Dakarai Larriette:

Okay.

Advertisement

Kanyuh:

So it is recorded.

Dakarai Larriette:

All right.

Advertisement

Kanyuh:

Along with all my sobriety evaluations, which have led me to determine you are under the influence and driving. So now I have to bring you in for a blood draw, and then you have to sit a detox window. I can’t let you operate safely, because I don’t believe that you can.

Dakarai Larriette:

Please explain to me what test I failed.

Advertisement

Kanyuh:

Well, they’re not pass or fail, okay? But I’m noticing several signs of divided attention, not being able to focus on the instructions as I’ve given them.

Dakarai Larriette:

Well, I’m being tired.

Advertisement

Kanyuh:

And then fine motor skills being impaired, such as not being able to touch the heel to toe, the rigid body movements, you have sway, and on and on and on. I’ll type up a whole, probably be an eight-page report on this. And then here’s the deal, if you’re right and there’s nothing in your body, everything gets thrown out.

Taya Graham:

He said, “If I’m wrong.” Well that’s an awfully big if, and you will soon learn what happened when Dakarai was tested when we speak to him, and what we showed was just the beginning of the way that Dakarai’s rights and body were violated by these troopers and he will share what happened to him in jail.

Advertisement

But first I’m joined by my reporting partner, Stephen Janis, who’s been looking into the case and going through the documents to report back to us. Stephen, thank you so much for joining me.

Stephen Janis:

Taya, thanks for having me. I appreciate it.

Taya Graham:

Advertisement

So, Stephen, what were the results of the blood test? Was the officer wrong?

Stephen Janis:

Yeah, it turns out the officer was absolutely wrong. The blood test showed no sign of any alcohol or anything else. So really it was a completely negative and actually inaccurate assessment of Dakarai’s state at that time. And so really it shows how flawed these systems are for evaluating people. And so yeah, absolutely nothing, zero, negative, although it took five months to find out.

Taya Graham:

Advertisement

Can you discuss some of the questions surrounding the field sobriety tests and what concerns it raises in these types of cases?

Stephen Janis:

Well, I think one of the concerns it raises is pretty simple. You have something masquerading a science that isn’t as scientific as it seems.

If you look at the studies, they were controlled environments that aren’t similar to what happens when you’re out in the field, and they’re also highly inaccurate, like showing inaccuracy rates of sometimes up to 35%. So I think it’s very, very, very critical to look at these with a cautious eye and not be so willing to embrace an officer’s interpretation of some very subjective test and say, “Well that person is drunk.”

Advertisement

Taya Graham:

Stephen, you also researched a strange statement the officer made, which is that he had over 800 hours of field sobriety training.

Okaiye:

Well, like I said, we’re trained in standardized field sobriety evaluations. We’ve had over 800 hours that, and let’s say he’s wrong, let’s say I’m wrong, let’s say that you are completely fine. In our professional opinion through our training experience, we don’t believe you can operate their motor vehicle safely, so it’s our job as we swore to take an oath to make sure that you get home and everybody else gets home safe. We’re not going to chance it.

Advertisement

What we’re going to have to do is we’ll allow you to park your vehicle, let your friend park your vehicle, whatever, we’re not trying to cost you the money, but we do have to take you to hospital, make sure you’re okay, because the substance we believe you’re taking with your medication, and then get the blood draw done. After blood draw is done, you’ll be detoxed and be free to go. There’s no added charges, nothing like that.

Taya Graham:

We researched the updated Michigan field sobriety test. Does that number sound right to you?

Stephen Janis:

Advertisement

Taya, it’s really interesting. What’s required right now is 24 hours of training for officers, including field training and some classwork, so 800 hours seems highly excessive. The guy really is doing a lot of time in the classroom. I don’t know if that really measures up, or if we can say that’s actually accurate, but right now the standard is much, much lower, and so I think questions remain about this entire arrest.

Taya Graham:

So do you have any insight into why these field tests occur at all? I, Wouldn’t it be easier just to do a breath, or urine, or blood tests and just let the science speak for itself?

Stephen Janis:

Advertisement

Well, I think that’s the big, big question. I know officers need tools to evaluate people, and they need tools to come up with probable cause, but we’ve watched so many of these where there’s so many questions and people really seem to pass them on every ostensible measure, and yet they still end up being arrested. So I think there needs to be a full and thorough evaluation of this process to make sure it’s really generating the results that are helpful in the sense that you’re arresting drunk drivers, but not innocent people, Taya.

Taya Graham:

And now to learn what happened after he was detained, the humiliation he endured at the hands of police and the consequences for him. Since I’m joined by Dakarai Larriett. Dakarai, thank you so much for joining me.

Dakarai Larriette:

Advertisement

Thank you so much for having me.

Taya Graham:

So tell me how this begins. Where were you headed before you were pulled over?

Dakarai Larriette:

Advertisement

Thanks for asking. So I was just dropping a friend off at his home.

Taya Graham:

When you were pulled over, how did the officer approach you? Did he describe why you were pulled over?

Dakarai Larriette:

Advertisement

So when he pulled me over, he mentioned that he believed I ran some blinking red lights a couple of miles away.

Taya Graham:

So the officer put you through a sobriety test. Can you describe what that was like for you?

Dakarai Larriette:

Advertisement

Well, it’s funny, I used to be a ballet dancer, and studied at the Alabama School of Fine Arts, and the way he was describing all of the steps, I thought to myself, “Is this a dance routine?”

It started out initially as an inspection of my eyes and my ability to follow his finger, I believe. And from there it became standing in one place, counting, I guess determining my perception of time and space, and a very complex heel-toe routine. I was asked, do I know the alphabet? And from there I had to do A through R. I did a number countdown and that was just with Officer Kanyuh. Officer Okaiye also inspected me and asked a number of different questions about my ability to drive.

Taya Graham:

I’ve tested myself and my friends stone-cold sober sobriety tests and found them difficult. What was going through your mind during this extensive test?

Advertisement

Dakarai Larriette:

So, I was wearing pajamas. It was 3:00 A.M. I planned to drop my buddy off and then hit right back to the house and go to sleep. So I was not dressed for the weather. We have to remember this was Michigan on April 10th, it’s still winter weather, and I was shivering. I was in this dark alley. It was scary. I thought I was about to be murdered, frankly.

So imagine having to do those tests and you’re thinking this is your last moment on this planet. I was thinking of my family. I had been in Cleveland, Ohio earlier that day for the solar eclipse, and spent some time with my sister, and it just really hit me that that might’ve been my last time seeing her or any of my family members, and I thought about my dog.

Taya Graham:

Advertisement

I’m so sorry.

Dakarai Larriette:

Sorry.

Taya Graham:

Advertisement

I know it’s traumatizing.

Dakarai Larriette:

My dog was in daycare, because I was in Cleveland for the weekend for the eclipse and I was just thinking, “What if my dog was at home by himself all this time when something happened to him?” He’s a nearly thirteen-year-old dog, he’s a senior dog, I’m sorry.

Taya Graham:

Advertisement

Trooper Kanyuh said you were wobbling excessively, that you fluttered and swayed during the one leg stand, and that your walk and turn were terrible, and that there were numerous clues that you were intoxicated. In truth, it’s a blessing to have the body camera, because it shows that you held your leg in the exact position you wanted for 26 seconds, on one foot, with not a single error.

When you listen to the body camera, does it shock you to hear what the officer was saying and how he mischaracterized what happened?

Dakarai Larriette:

I guess the other interesting thing for me, and I guess surprise if you will, was what was happening to my friend in the passenger seat. So, that is not in the video that has gone public, and I have not shared that body cam video, because it is obviously altered. All the videos are altered.

Advertisement

In fact, I made my freedom of Information Act request two, three days after this incident. It took them five months to give me video, and there are missing chunks in the video, audio between the officers even when they’re standing next to each other is inconsistent. So it sounds like it was dubbed, and there are sections that are completely missing audio. You can tell they were obsessed with the car, “Nice car.”

It was just humiliation and my survival mechanism was, “Dakarai, you’re not going to win this battle in a dark alley at 3:00 A.M. two cops. You will not. Be quiet, comply. You can win the war because you are going to have all the evidence on your side. You’re sober, you don’t use drugs. All the evidence is going to support your side of the story.”

And I guess that’s why I was so heartbroken when I heard the word “drugs” uttered by Okaiye because then I thought, “Well you can’t even win when you’re doing the right thing. If they had just found the stash, I would still be in jail and my life would be ruined.”

Taya Graham:

Advertisement

So if I understand correctly, you were pressured into a blood draw at the hospital. It was the best thing, considering that you had no drugs in your system, but still you were pressured into it.

Dakarai Larriette:

Yes, I was absolutely pressured to do the blood draw.

And how did I arrive at the decision to do it? Well, I was told that I would get six points on my license and a suspension if I did not comply. But I thought it was so odd that they wouldn’t just give me a breathalyzer, like something objective, besides a dance routine.

Advertisement

Taya Graham:

The way the officers treated you, I thought, was very demeaning, and I hate to bring this up, but you were accused of swallowing drugs and you were made to go to the bathroom in front of Trooper Kanyuh. This officer appeared very polite on the early body camera, but forcing you to do this is violating.

Dakarai Larriette:

Going into the jail, it’s a typical booking process As one was seen on TV, because I’ve never been through this process before, ever, never been stopped like this, but name, all my identifying factors, et cetera, and fingerprints. All that is collected. And then they put me in this machine that looks like something from TSA and they are scanning me, I presume for any type of contraband.

Advertisement

And there is a novice that is running the machine, and very unclear on how to operate it and they identify what they called an anomaly. And from there on throughout the night, I am being sent through this machine, I presume x-rays, again, and again, and again. So I’m not even really lodged, if you will, in the jail. I go to the cell, I come back, I go to the cell, I come back.

Finally, they brought on a technician that seemed like she actually knew what she was doing. She looks at it and she goes, oh, those are gas bubbles. In the midst of all of this going on, Kanyuh goes, “That looks like a bag of drugs! Confess now or you’re going to face a trafficking charge, too!” At some point I’m going back and forth, back and forth to the cell, and I asked if I could use the restroom.

Kanyuh comes behind me and says that’s where I need to go. It’s just this open toilet that anyone in the room can see and he yells, “Don’t flush!” It was so dehumanizing.

Taya Graham:

Advertisement

It seems to me the officer is very performative in his behavior of being a good guy and a professional on camera, but in the jail he really does change.

Dakarai Larriette:

A couple of follow-ups on that.

So, when he was playing the good guy, good cop and Okaiye obviously tried to do it as well, I just want to go back to something you said. They offered to park my car for me. And I was discussing this with the passenger this morning, and we both just like light bulb moment realized that would’ve been the opportunity to plant.

Advertisement

Taya Graham:

So something that concerns me, is that for about two minutes the officer’s really been searching through his patrol car and then he says to another officer that you seem confused, and then he says he’s trying to find his stash. What do you think this means?

Dakarai Larriette:

It’s a hundred percent drugs, and it’s all written there in very plain, easy-to-understand language not even coded. And you really have to think about not only do we have that which is mind-boggling, but the context of it all.

Advertisement

So the context is he spent two minutes digging through his cop car, the backseat, then he moved to the trunk, whatever he was looking for, he wanted it badly. Okaiye comes around to the back of the car probably trying to figure out what’s going on with this guy, because think about it, I’ve been standing in the cold, waiting after the sobriety test while he’s fumbling around in the car.

So Okaiye comes around to see what’s going on. He says “drugs.” Kanyuh responds, “I don’t think I have any, I knew I had a stash in here.” So he connects drugs to stash. Then there’s a little bit of mumbling, but listen to it intently. They then basically make a comment to each other that I’m going to refuse anyway, meaning I would refuse an opportunity for them to get in my car, to search my car, to park my car, and that’s when they ultimately decide “We’ll just charge him on weed and alcohol.”

Taya Graham:

Did their dash camera show that you allegedly ran through this flashing red light? You calmly told them you committed no moving violations. Can you tell me what the dash camera actually showed?

Advertisement

Dakarai Larriette:

I believe the light they’re referring to was completely green, so that one was thrown out. And then the light that they alleged that I did not stop at, the one that actually was red, I pulled two, I paused, I put my signal on and I turned.

Taya Graham:

I read that it took over five months for you to receive your negative drug and alcohol results. Is that correct?

Advertisement

Dakarai Larriette:

At the hospital, I immediately tested negative for alcohol, and because the hospital was connected to my own healthcare plan, I managed to get that report in real time, and pulled it for myself when I got home that afternoon. And then, of course, they confirmed the result to me when I asked at the jail.

Now in terms of getting the drug test results and Michigan State Police’s version of the alcohol test results, that did not happen until the very end of September. But if you look at the timeline in the request for testing, they knew by middle of April that everything was negative, and it seems like they continued to test, and test, and test. I don’t know if that’s a standard procedure or they were just incredulous that I was negative.

Taya Graham:

Advertisement

Can you tell me what you went through during that time, that five months waiting to be proven fully innocent? It must have been incredibly stressful.

Dakarai Larriette:

My first responsibility was to confirm that there was not a criminal matter at all against me, and the case actually was thrown out within a week, but they refused to give me a receipt or confirmation or anything like that until I received that formal test. But I still haven’t received anything that says that the case is a hundred percent closed. I have not.

So two and a half months I did not have a plastic driver’s license card, couldn’t rent a car. I traveled extensively, and I would contact the sergeant, who I believed to be the bosses of the two troopers, almost weekly. Like, “Hey, what’s going on? Did you guys get the results? This is really inconveniencing my life.” And I would get answers that were very opaque, like, “we’re still working on your test” which really confused me and worried me that there was some tampering happening.

Advertisement

Taya Graham:

What do you want as the result of sharing your experience? What do you hope that outcome will be?

Dakarai Larriette:

I made a commitment that when I was mistreated I would use my resources, my privilege, to help those behind me. And I could have easily just walked away, and took my driver’s license, and been fine, but I decided I have got to expose this, I’ve got to get these troopers off the streets, and I’ve already reached out to some major, major law firms and encouraged them to look into what’s going on in Southwest Michigan. I am already protected. I’m not under any criminal investigation, but when I was in that jail, I knew that there were innocent people in there.

Advertisement

Taya Graham:

If you could speak directly to the troopers who arrested and harassed you, what would you want to say to them? What would you want to tell them if you knew they were listening to you right now?

Dakarai Larriette:

I would want them to know that I’m a person. I’m a human being. People care about me. Think about that. Think about what you’re supposed to be doing in your job. You’re supposed to be taking care of people protecting, not inventing crimes.

Advertisement

Taya Graham:

Now, I want to reiterate what I said at the beginning of the show, drunk driving is a dangerous and destructive crime. And I, for one, understand why police departments and the public emphasize efforts to thwart it. Drunk driving deaths account for roughly one third of all traffic fatalities every year. Roughly 11,000 died in 2023 due to people driving while intoxicated.

But also, I think that what we witnessed in the video of Dakarai’s arrest shows the pitfalls of abandoning common sense and sound science as we try to prevent it, or more precisely what happens when a zeal to address a problem with cops and cuffs overwhelms common sense and the nuance that comes with it.

This is certainly not the only false DUI arrest we have covered. There were the bogus charges against a Dallas firefighter Thomas C, who was forced to retire from his lifelong job as a first responder when officers used another specious field sobriety test to accuse him of driving under the influence, because he freely admitted using his doctor-prescribed Adderall. It took him two years to get his test results, which, although they were negative or too late to save his job.

Advertisement

Or we shared the story of Harris Elias of Colorado, a professional pilot who was pulled over and again, thanks to a biased interpretation of a field sobriety test, ended up with false DUI charges, charges that took months to clear, that threatened his ability to do his job, and later resulted in a major civil rights lawsuit.

All of these share some common problems. Cops are overly eager to bring DUI charges, and because of that, ignoring the evidence that is contrary to their opinions. Add to that a very subjective and flawed field sobriety test, a diagnostic process that seems easily susceptible to the concept of confirmation bias, where the officer administering the test already believes the subject is intoxicated, and thus interprets the results to confirm what he already believes, no matter how the person performs.

And yes, there are imperatives that often lead to the incarceration of the innocent. Well-intentioned organizations like MADD, Mothers Against Drunk Driving, run DUI Ticket Competitions that frequently encourage officers to hand out DUIs in order to receive grants, awards, public acclaim, and promotions. Even the most wholesome goals can be warped when law enforcement is incentivized by quotas and financial rewards.

But I believe something else lies deeper at the very root of these bogus arrests we’ve covered, something more profound than just an officer making a bad decision, or not maintaining an open mind about how to enforce the law. I believe that flawed field sobriety tests are just like the other unjust forms of governance that were originally designed to solve a problem, but in the end seem only to perpetuate them. So what do I mean?

Advertisement

Well, Stephen and I have spent a great deal of time reporting across the country on a variety of issues, and that includes our hometown of Baltimore where we spent five years documenting the use of tax breaks to spur development. As you may or may not know, Baltimore is a city beset by poverty and housing segregation that has struggled to stem population loss. It’s often deemed one of the most violent cities in America, and it has some of the highest concentrations of poverty, with thousands of abandoned homes, and to top it all off the highest property tax rate in the state, almost double the surrounding counties.

Put simply much of Baltimore is part of America’s great inequality machine, incapable of producing enough affordable housing or reasonably priced healthcare for all of us, while increasing the amount of wealth concentrated among the top 1%, a symbol in many ways for how our current system consistently fails to address the needs of the many. And to my point about our flawed system for catching drunk drivers, Baltimore’s response has been equally flawed in addressing the root problem that afflicts our community.

As we outlined in our documentary Tax Broke, one of the city’s primary solutions to population loss has been to award huge tax breaks to these developers. These carve-outs have allowed the wealthiest suburban builders to avoid paying the high rate that the city’s working class is regularly subjected to.

And this is no pittance. Some estimate the city has given away billions in future revenues in order to build luxury developments that ironically do not include affordable housing. Instead, future tax revenue that should help pay for critical services and investment in the city’s future has been handed over to the already wealthy.

Advertisement

Now of course, you’re probably asking at this point, “Taya, what are you talking about? How are tax breaks for development related to unfounded DUI arrests? What on earth are the commonalities between a bad development strategy and an overeager DUI cop?” Well hear me out.

Here’s where it all ties together, and I will even give it a title: America is the Land of the Perverse Incentive. In other words, our country and its great neoliberal project have abandoned the idea that the government can do good and productive things. Instead, the elites have exchanged that idea for the false narrative that only incentives laden with cash can prompt real productive behavior.

In this land of perverse incentives, medical companies are incentivized to bill people for diseases that they do not have. As stated in this report by the Wall Street Journal that found billions of dollars spent on patients who did not have the underlying disease that the medical insurers submitted to the government.

In the land of perverse incentives, private equity firms take over stable companies and load them up with debt so they can pay themselves a dividend. Then, they fire staff and neglect investing in the firm itself, selling a carcass to Wall Street for the vultures.

Advertisement

In the land of perverse incentives, people make more money trading money than they do building things like affordable housing. In fact, Wall Street creates huge funds to purchase single-family homes across the country and then they jack up rents, so middle-class families are stuck without options.

And of course, in the land of perverse incentives, cops who make more DOI arrests are given awards, and departments that make more drunk driving stops are given more money, and thus we have the stories we reported before. And finally, in the land of perverse incentives, one of the poorest cities in the country has doled out billions in tax breaks to wealthy developers who don’t need it, in fact, it’s so absurd that luxury condos on top of the Four Seasons hotel in Baltimore received millions in tax breaks for environmental mediation, even though the records we uncovered showed none was done, and that the condos in question were literally hundreds of feet above the ground where the non-existent pollution was actually supposed to be.

All of this is why we end up with sketchy DOI arrests based on shaky science, or a poor city that can’t build affordable housing, but can fund wealthy developers to build luxury apartments. Why a city rocked with poverty is neglected, while a system that monetizes the sick, so wealthy Wall Street investors can get rich over billing them and pushing them into bankruptcy, is called, ironically, health care.

It’s this thread that connects all the dots of the realities that often seem to contradict themselves. Why would the wealthiest country in the world not be able to deliver affordable medical care to all who need it? And why would one of the poorest cities in the country not be able to build affordable housing if it is at the same time capable of giving away a billion dollars of tax revenue to the ultra rich?

Advertisement

All of these questions are worth asking, because the outcomes are just so difficult to comprehend. Being sick should not be a prerequisite to bankruptcy. Being poor should not mean you pay higher taxes than someone who is unfathomably wealthy. Being sober, by having difficulty balancing on one leg, which was decidedly not the case with our guest, should not lead to an arrest charge and a shattered life.

These apparent destructive inadequacies of governance affect all of us. This inability to use the resources of the people to serve the people ensures that we all suffer. This type of incentivized mayhem that finds form in bad policing should make us all question the priority of those who hold and wield the power. It’s incumbent upon us to hold them accountable and remind them that they serve us, not the other way around.

I would like to thank my guest, Dakarai, for coming forward, courageously sharing his experience and shining a light on this abuse of power. Thank you so much for speaking with us.

And of course, I have to thank Intrepid reporter Stephen Janis for his writing, research and editing on this piece. Thank you, Stephen.

Advertisement

Stephen Janis:

Taya, thanks having me. I appreciate it.

Taya Graham:

And I want to thank mods of the show, Holy D and Lacey R for their support. Thank you.

Advertisement

And a very special thanks to our Accountability Reports Patreons, we appreciate you and I look forward to thanking each and every one of you personally in our next live stream, especially Patreon Associate Producers, John E.R., David K, Louis P, and our super friends, Shane B, Pineapple Girl, Chris R, Matter of Rights, and Angela True.

And I want you to know that if you have video evidence of police misconduct, please email it to us privately at par@therealnews or reach out to me on Facebook or Twitter @TayasBaltimore, and we might be able to investigate for you. And please like, share, and comment on our videos, it can actually help our guests, and you know I read your comments and I really appreciate them.

And of course, once again, we have to thank our corporate sponsor. Wait, that’s right, we don’t have a corporate sponsor. We don’t take corporate dollars. We don’t run ads, but we do have a Patreon, Accountability Reports. So if you feel inspired to donate, please do. You know you never see an ad on this channel, and we’re never going to be sponsored, so anything you can spare is truly appreciated.

My name is Taya Graham and I am your host of the Police Accountability Report. Please, be safe out there.

Advertisement

Creative Commons License

Republish our articles for free, online or in print, under a Creative Commons license.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

News

Northern Lights over Iceland in sped-up footage

Published

on

Northern Lights over Iceland in sped-up footage

Time-lapse photos have captured the Northern Lights on the outskirts of the capital Reykjavik.

The lights, also known as aurora borealis, occur when charged particles collide with gases in the Earth’s atmosphere around the magnetic poles. As they collide, light is emitted at various wavelengths, creating colourful displays in the sky.

The auroras are most commonly seen over high polar latitudes, and are chiefly influenced by geomagnetic storms which originate from activity on the Sun.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Business

AI is coming for wealth management

Published

on

AI is coming for wealth management

If Silicon Valley is right and the technology progresses, we may witness a new wave of industry disruption 

Source link

Continue Reading

Money

Businessman Mike Ashley launches fresh £111million bid for luxury bag firm Mulberry

Published

on

Businessman Mike Ashley launches fresh £111million bid for luxury bag firm Mulberry

MIKE Ashley’s Frasers Group last night launched a fresh £111million bid for Mulberry — while fanning doubts about the luxury bag group’s survival chances.

The move came hours after it emerged Frasers had invested £10million in online firm THG’s cash call.

Mike Ashley’s Frasers Group last night launched a fresh £111million bid for Mulberry

3

Mike Ashley’s Frasers Group last night launched a fresh £111million bid for MulberryCredit: Getty

THG, formerly The Hut Group, raised £95million to fund taking its Ingenuity tech unit private.

Advertisement

Mulberry had rejected Mr Ashley’s previous £83million approach in favour of a £10million fundraising, backed by its biggest ­investor Challice Group, which is controlled by Singapore billionaire Christina Ong.

However, after the London stock market closed yesterday Frasers, which has a 37 per cent stake in Mulberry already, launched a new 150p-a-share approach.

Mulberry is currently valued at £79.9million on the stock market.

Frasers said it had significant reservations that the £10million raised will be enough to support the firm.

Advertisement

Mr Ashley suggested his ownership would “ensure its long-term survival and success”.

He has had hits and misses with investments in rival retailers — notably Matches Fashion, which went into administration.

Meanwhile, THG boss Matt Moulding had another swipe at the London Stock Exchange.

He said: “It’s clear the LSE isn’t a place for a tech/infrastructure business like Ingenuity.”

Advertisement
I went to a jumble sale & hit the jackpot – I left with a Mulberry bag for 30 PENCE, and two sacks of clothes for a quid

Power push

SCOTTISH POWER is doubling its investment in Britain from £12billion to £24billion — in a vote of confidence for the country.

The business, owned by Spain’s Iberdrola, plans to upgrade high-voltage cables and build more wind farms to back a Government push to cut UK reliance on gas imports.

Jobs gloomy

THE jobs market has remained in the doldrums over the summer, according to recruiter Hays.

It reported that fees from job placings had dropped by a fifth over the past three months, with permanent jobs slumping the most.

Advertisement

Hays is also cutting its own workforce by another 200 employees.

Good week

Cyber firm Darktrace founder Poppy Gustafsson was named as the Government’s new Minister for Investment

3

Cyber firm Darktrace founder Poppy Gustafsson was named as the Government’s new Minister for InvestmentCredit: Getty

Bad week

Greg Fitzgerald, the boss of housebuilder Vistry, which issued a profit warning after it got its sums wrong

3

Greg Fitzgerald, the boss of housebuilder Vistry, which issued a profit warning after it got its sums wrong

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

EuroMillions results and numbers: National Lottery draw tonight, October 11

Published

on

EuroMillions results and numbers: National Lottery draw tonight, October 8

THE draw for tonight’s National Lottery EuroMillions (October 11, 2024) has taken place, with life-changing cash prizes at stake.

Check the results to see if you have just won a fortune and bagged enough to start that jet-set lifestyle you always dreamed of.

Have you got the winning EuroMillions ticket?

2

Have you got the winning EuroMillions ticket?

Every EuroMillions ticket also bags you an automatic entry into the UK Millionaire Maker, which guarantees at least one player will pocket £1million in every draw.

Advertisement

You can find out if you’re a winner by checking your ticket against tonight’s numbers below.

Tonight’s National Lottery EuroMillions winning numbers are: 16, 23, 32, 46, 49 and the Lucky Stars are: 04, 05.

The UK Millionaire Maker Selection winners are: MZBX76775.

Tonight’s National Lottery Thunderball winning numbers are: 27, 29, 30, 31, 39 and the Thunderball is 08.

Advertisement

TOP 5 BIGGEST LOTTERY WINS IN THE WORLD

  1. £1.308 billion (Powerball) on January 13 2016 in the US, for which three winning tickets were sold, remains history’s biggest lottery prize
  2. £1.267 billion (Mega Million) a winner from South Carolina took their time to come forward to claim their prize in March 2019 not long before the April deadline
  3. £633.76 million (Powerball draw) from a winner from Wisconsin
  4. £625.76 million (Powerball)  Mavis L. Wanczyk of Chicopee, Massachusetts claimed the jackpot in August 2017
  5. £575.53 million (Powerball)  A lucky pair of winners scooped the jackpot in Iowa and New York in October 2018

The first EuroMillions draw took place on February 7, 2004, by three organisations: France’s Française des Jeux, Loterías y Apuestas del Estado in Spain and the Camelot in the UK.

One of the UK’s biggest prizes was up for grabs on December, 4, 2020 with a whopping £175million EuroMillions jackpot, which would make a winner richer than Adele.

Another previous UK winner who’s whole life was altered with their jackpot was a player who wanted to remain anonymous on October 8, 2019. They walked off with a cool £170,221,000.

Colin and Chris Weir, from Largs in Scotland, netted a huge £161,653,000 in the July 12, 2011.

Advertisement

Adrian and Gillian Bayford, from Haverhill, Suffolk, picked up £148,656,000 after they played the draw on August, 10, 2012, while Jane Park became Britain’s youngest lottery winner when she scooped up £1 million in 2013.

The odds of winning any EuroMillions prize are 1 in 13.

Could tonight’s jackpot of £24million see you handing in your notice and swapping the daily commute for slurping champagne on a super yacht or lying back on a private beach in the Bahamas?

EuroMillions tickets come with an automatic entry into the UK Million Maker too

2

Advertisement
EuroMillions tickets come with an automatic entry into the UK Million Maker too

Source link

Continue Reading

Business

DP World shelves planned £1bn UK investment ahead of summit

Published

on

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

DP World has shelved an announcement of a £1bn cash injection into its main London port on the eve of the UK’s international investment summit, triggering a row between ministers over who was to blame.

The Dubai-based company owns P&O Ferries, which was called a “cowboy operator” earlier this week by UK transport secretary Louise Haigh, a reference to its firing and rehiring of 800 staff two years ago.

Advertisement

The Labour government is banning such practices as part of its overhaul of employment laws set out in a bill on workers’ rights published this week. 

DP World has been finalising plans to invest £1bn into its London Gateway container port in Essex, according to one person familiar with the matter.

Although the project is still likely to go ahead, people close to the company say, it is unlikely to be announced as part of UK Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer’s international investment summit on Monday.

A report that DP World had delayed the announcement earlier on Friday in response to Haigh’s comments set off political recriminations, with divisions emerging at the highest level of government.

Advertisement

Within hours Downing Street was distancing itself from the transport secretary’s words. “Louise Haigh’s comments were her own personal view and don’t represent the view of the government,” said a Number 10 official.

“We continue to work closely with DP World, which has already delivered significant investment in the London Gateway and Southampton ports, to help deliver for the UK economy,” they added.

But another Whitehall figure said a press release on the government website that on Wednesday called P&O a “rogue employer” had been signed off by Downing Street in advance.

“It’s for the birds that they didn’t have sight of this from start to finish,” he said. “Also, various cabinet ministers have used language about P&O having been ‘rogue operators’ over the last two years. This is not something new.”

Advertisement

The Labour government’s investment summit on Monday is designed to show the world that Britain is “open for business”, with various other announcements from other companies.

One Dubai-based executive said Number 10 was wise to distance itself from Haigh’s comments, but insisted that DP World’s investment decisions were based on commercial realities rather than political barbs.

DP World had not managed to finalise internal reviews in time to coincide with the summit, the executive added.

Sultan Ahmed bin Sulayem, the chief executive of the conglomerate, was still planning to attend the conference on Monday, two people familiar with his plans said. A media report earlier on Friday had suggested he was going to cancel the trip.

Advertisement

Another person said Downing Street’s firm intervention would make it more likely that other representatives from big UAE investors — such as sovereign wealth funds — will attend the summit.

The argument highlights the tension between the government’s attempts to improve workers’ rights and its efforts to attract big business investments from around the world. 

Another industry executive close to DP World said the company was still planning to invest in the expansion, adding that the development would be driven by business rather than politics. But it was now unclear whether the group wanted to announce this at the summit, the person added.

A UK government official said DP World was “driven commercially” and retained “big plans” for investment into the UK. The board oversight of the investment, which had been in the works for some time, was not in response to the comments, the official added. 

DP World’s investments into the UK have formed a major part of the large deployment of capital into the country from the United Arab Emirates, which in 2021 signed a £10bn strategic bilateral investment partnership. The company declined to comment.

The new government’s flagship event has already been criticised by businesses over its poor organisation. Several CEOs due to attend have been left questioning whether to make the trip, the FT previously reported.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Money

I was left in shock after realising £500,000 three-storey London house I was browsing was actually a tiny shed – The Sun

Published

on

I was left in shock after realising £500,000 three-storey London house I was browsing was actually a tiny shed – The Sun

A HOUSE hunter claims a £500,000 London property she was browsing was not a three-storey townhouse – but the “shed” next door.

The property in Hackney, London, demands “offers in excess of £525,000” – despite being a long, slim building of just 545sqft.

The so-called 'shed' has been converted into one bedroom, one bathroom, a kitchen.

8

The so-called ‘shed’ has been converted into one bedroom, one bathroom, a kitchen.Credit: Kennedy Newsand Media
The outdoor area of the property

8

Advertisement
The outdoor area of the propertyCredit: Kennedy Newsand Media
The kitchen of the £500,000 'shed'

8

The kitchen of the £500,000 ‘shed’Credit: Kennedy Newsand Media
The property has left social media users baffled

8

The property has left social media users baffledCredit: Kennedy Newsand Media
But some users think it's a good deal for Hackney

8

But some users think it’s a good deal for HackneyCredit: Kennedy Newsand Media
The property is attached to a large three-storey property

8

Advertisement
The property is attached to a large three-storey propertyCredit: Kennedy Newsand Media

The so-called shed has been converted into one bedroom, one bathroom, a kitchen.

But the property is attached to a large three-storey property that has left some social media users baffled over which home they would be actually buying.

TikTok user Charlotte Moran shared a clip after coming across the bizarre listing captioned, “Hackney has me deceased” – gaining tens of thousands of views.

In the clip, Charlotte points at the bigger property, saying: “I’m looking at this. I thought, wow, look at that house”.

Advertisement

She then points at a tiny white building next to it and shocking adds “no, it’s the shed on the side for half a million pounds.”

Many users have taken to the comments to express that the thought of the shed being for sale at the price is “insane” and even likened the property to a “portacabin”.

But other users have argued that it’s “pretty cheap for Hackney standards”, with one stating: “You’re paying for the potential.”

Listed by Winkworth estate agents, the newly refurbished home promises to be “functional and aesthetically pleasing” as well as offering an “enchanting’” outdoor space – with parking included.

Advertisement

A spokesperson for Winkworth said: “You wouldn’t get that type of house for £525,000.

“Anyone who thinks that doesn’t necessarily know about property in my opinion.

I’m 28 & live in a tiny home – we pay no rent & the view is amazing

“If it was up to me it’d be slightly less but the potential to go up an extra story and make it into a nice two-story house with a garden.

“It’s attached to another building so effectively you have to take the picture of the whole thing. It’s part of the freehold of that building. You have to show that as well because it is a conversion.

Advertisement

“Considering that’s also part of the same [building] it will be all under the same freehold company you do have to show the building.

“The main benefits are that it’s got a garden, it’s gated, it’s got its own driveway. It’s very close to Clapton station and has been recently refurbished.

“It’s a very sought after area. It’s very central.

“The potential justifies the price. To potentially go up and add an extra story.”

Advertisement

However some househunters on social media were less convinced about the price.

One said: “Somebody needs to tell the estate agent, ‘that is a garage sir’.”

Another said: “Stop it. It’s a portacabin.”

One added: “You could literally buy a mansion up here in Scotland for that, it’s wild.”

Advertisement

Charlotte responded: “Honestly Hackney has gone mad.”

The front of the property - next to a townhouse

8

The front of the property – next to a townhouseCredit: Kennedy Newsand Media
The property is 545sqft

8

The property is 545sqftCredit: Kennedy Newsand Media

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 WordupNews.com