Connect with us

News

Owner had to give up his dog to get a home

Published

on

Owner had to give up his dog to get a home
James Strauch James Strauch with dog Bruno. James has a ginger beard.
Bruno is a large, black dog and he is resting on James' shoulder.James Strauch

James Strauch says he only got positive responses from landlords when he had forget to state he had a pet dog

A dog owner had to sell his beloved pet to avoid being homeless after he failed 60 times to get a home to rent.

James Strauch, 42, said he eventually started offering landlords £1,000 deposit to let him rent with his four-year-old labrador mastiff cross, Bruno.

But after eight months of searching and weighing up whether to be “homeless with a dog”, he made the tough decision to give Bruno up.

Dogs Trust said around 15% of the animals left at its shelters were there because the owners had changed accommodation, but the National Residential Landlords Association said bad tenants with pets cause additional risk for landlords.

Advertisement

James, a maintenance manager and RLNI volunteer from Rhyl, was living with his former partner when he homed Bruno as a puppy.

But when the couple broke up he wanted to find another rental property for just Bruno and himself.

James said: “I must have applied for 50, 60 properties.

“When I started missing [Bruno] off as a clerical error I was getting replies virtually straight away. But as soon as the dog was mentioned, it was a blanket ‘no’.”

Advertisement

He added: “I went through to the point of offering double, triple a deposit, an extra thousand pounds on top, just in case. I said I’d redecorate and re-carpet everything after – and there was just no interest.”

James Strauch  Bruno the dog laying on a yellow towel on a bed. James Strauch

James found accommodation within a week without Bruno on the application

James stayed in a friend’s converted garage for six months while he continued searching for his own place, but had to move out when the friend and his partner had a baby.

It was then James said he faced the “most frustrating, upsetting” decision to give up Bruno.

“He’s only ever known me from a puppy. As far as I’m concerned, I’m his entire world,” James said.

Advertisement

“They’re not just a pet, you know – you do treat them like one of the family.”

James found someone else nearby willing to adopt Bruno, but said the moment he gave him away was “gut wrenching”.

“It’s only been two months, and still now I have sad moments,” he said.

After he gave Bruno up, James said he saw an instant change in responses from landlords and agencies.

Advertisement

“As soon as I rehomed Bruno, I had a viewing within two days, I had the keys in my hand within a week,” he said.

George King A cute, black and white cat, with huge turquoise and black eyes. George King

More than half of households in Wales own a pet

Cat owner George King said he spent a year looking for somewhere to live before eventually deciding to lie and hide his pet, Didi, from the landlord.

He said: “Landlords basically said they didn’t want to have to deal with the damage of the animal.

“I was like, ‘this is a cat w’’re talking about, not a pitbull’.

Advertisement

“I guess the pressures in the north Wales market mean they could afford to put anyone else in.”

There is no statutory right for people to be allowed to keep a pet while renting in the UK, but guidance suggests landlords cannot unreasonably refuse requests.

Wales operations manager for the National Residential Landlords Association, Steve Bletsoe, said landlords should have a right to veto pets.

“Ultimately, when it comes to managing an asset, it’s around risk and pets add an additional risk,” he said.

Advertisement

“What we’re very keen to avoid is a kind of blanket rule where it says all pets must be allowed.”

Rehoming manager at the Dogs Trust, Kim Davies is on her knees next to two dogs. Kim has curly blonde hair. One dog is brown and the other dog is a shabby grey. They are outside in a play pen.

Dogs Trust would like to see rental properties be more pet friendly

Dogs Trust said Wales had seen a rise of almost a third in the amount of people giving up their dogs because of accommodation issues between March and July this year, compared with the same period in 2023.

“Giving up their dog has been the last resort,” said rehoming manager, Kim Davis.

“We really feel that here, because we don’t want it. The dogs themselves are heartbroken.”

Advertisement

In Wales the law has guidance putting the onus on the landlord to consider each application to rent with a pet.

RSPCA head of public affairs David Bowles said: “The RSPCA believes landlords are just ignoring that guidance.”

The Welsh government said it would be considering supportive measures to renters with pets, and will be setting out proposals later this month.

The UK government is looking at changing laws around renting with pets in England, with the second reading of the Renters’ Rights Bill having taken place in Parliament on Wednesday, while Scotland is also looking at new legislation.

Advertisement

The UK bill has been welcomed by the RSPCA, who believe it will compel landlords to declare reasons for refusing requests to keep a pet.

The bill also proposes the services of an ombudsman, who would help resolve disputes between tenants and landlords without the need to go to court.

Graphic showing tips of how to rent with a pet. On the left is a black and white photo of a dog and on the right is a green box with several points.
The title says: How can I rent with pets?
The bullet points are as follows: private landlords decide whether to allow pets in their property, always be honest with your landlord or letting agent, letting agent groups advise getting references about your pet from previous landlords, Dogs Trust recommend writing a CV for your pet with vaccinations and breed information, and you may also attempt to introduce your pet to a prospective landlord.

Watch BBC Wales Live on iPlayer for more on this story

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

News

We Must Save Earth’s Wildlife In Order to Save Ourselves

Published

on

We Must Save Earth's Wildlife In Order to Save Ourselves

My introduction to the Amazon came in 1990 when I was a research assistant, fresh out of college and living elbow-to-elbow with a team of scientists aboard a floating raft on the Amazon River. Every day brought the promise of new discoveries, and many mornings I found myself waiting impatiently for the first glimmer of dawn to peek through the canopy, fading from deep indigo to soft gold as it filtered through the leaves and revealed a slumbering world come to life. Lowland tapirs grazing on the riverbank, their long, flexible snouts half-buried in the grass. Pink river dolphins gliding through murky waters. A tableau of life in all its forms, rich and full and astonishingly fragile.  

Within a year of my arrival, much of that pristine forest had vanished, felled to make way for human settlements. Back then the Brazilian government was trying to entice families to leave overcrowded urban favelas and make their homes in the forest. One governor handed out chainsaws to newly minted landowners with the gusto of Oprah handing out car keys to a studio audience. In the process, species like the dolphins and the tapirs, were driven from their habitats, their numbers rapidly dwindling.  

Flash forward to present-day and we find the same tragic story unfolding around the world. According to the 2024 Living Planet Report released today by World Wildlife Fund (WWF), where I serve as chief scientist, globally monitored wildlife populations have plummeted by 73% in just 50 years, driven mostly by habitat destruction, overexploitation, and climate change. This decline has a dangerous ripple effect. Earth’s wild places cannot long survive the loss of its wildlife. And human civilization, despite its undeniable progress and technological wonders, remains bound to the health of the one planet we all call home.  

The path we’re on now leads to catastrophic tipping points—thresholds where harmful changes to nature and the climate become potentially irreversible. The decisions we make in the next five years will determine if we can reverse these trends or watch them spiral out of control.

Advertisement

Read more: Biodiversity Is Nearing an ‘Extinction Crisis,’ Animal Researchers Say

To appreciate what’s at stake, one must understand the connection between shrinking wildlife populations, collapsing ecosystems, and human well-being. Consider the tapir that used to greet me along the banks of the Amazon River. These quiet, roaming creatures—sometimes called “gardeners of the forest”—consume a variety of fruits, leaves, and shoots, and disperse the seeds through their dung, helping to maintain the diversity and structure of the forest. Without the tapir and other seed dispersers like tamarin monkeys and toucans, many of the large, hardwood trees they help propagate may fail to regenerate, leading to a less resilient forest that doesn’t store as much carbon as it once did. As healthy, intact forests disappear, they take with them the services that sustain human life: food, water, medicine, and the very air we breathe.  

Today, the Amazon rainforest is on the brink of a transformation into degraded savanna, which would dramatically accelerate the decline of wildlife and the destabilization of our climate globally. Coral reefs face a similar fate: parrotfish, which play a crucial role in controlling algae growth, have seen their populations plummet on the Mesoamerican Reef due to overfishing. Without them, algae can overgrow and outcompete corals for space, light, and nutrients, hastening the collapse of these vital ecosystems and making them less resilient and more susceptible to warming waters brought about by climate change. The loss of this reef and others around the world would have dire consequences for the 330 million people who rely on them for food and coastal protection from storms. 

Nature is the bedrock of human survival. By protecting the tapir, parrotfish, and other quiet engineers of the natural world, we invest in our own future. But time is running out.   

Advertisement

This month’s U.N. biodiversity conference in Colombia (COP16) offers a key moment that we need to seize. Governments will present plans at COP16 intended to align with the globally adopted target of halting and reversing nature loss by 2030. Getting there requires conserving 30% of global landscapes and seascapes by the end of this decade, which in and of itself requires significant increases in both government commitments and financial flows to projects that keep nature intact. WWF’s own analysis finds that most national commitments heading into COP16 fall short of what’s required. We hope today’s Living Planet Report findings inspire more countries to get serious about what needs to be done and strengthen their domestic targets and action plans before COP16 concludes on Nov. 1. 

On the domestic front, the U.S. remains the only U.N. member state that has yet to ratify the 1992 Convention on Biological Diversity—meaning that it will be attending as an observer but not a party to the conference in Colombia. Nonetheless, the Biden Administration has set goals through its America the Beautiful initiative which strongly align with national values as well as global goals. Namely, it has committed to “restore, connect and conserve at least 30% of lands and waters by 2030.” Now the U.S. needs to make good on that commitment.  

The task before us is unprecedented in its scope. And yet, I am hopeful. Here’s why: in my home state of California, one of my favorite places to visit is the Pinnacles National Park, where I can look up and see California condors—once nearly extinct—soaring on the thermals. These massive birds, with their wingspans stretching nearly 10 ft., play a crucial role in the ecosystem as scavengers, cleaning up carcasses that could carry disease and recycling nutrients back into the environment. As I walk along the foothills, with the distinct scent of sagebrush and sunbaked earth rising from the chaparral vegetation around me, I think about the decades of conservation efforts that brought this species back from the brink. Their recovery is a testament to what bold, sustained action can achieve.  

At-risk species like the lowland tapir in the Amazon and success stories like the California condor embody the choice we face. Both species serve critical roles in the conservation of nature and the myriad benefits it provides to billions of people. One species is rapidly declining, while the other is slowly rebounding. The difference is human action. If we act decisively, we can ensure that more species, like the condor, find their way back to thriving ecosystems. With crucial tipping points looming on the horizon, the question of whether we tip toward restoration or irreversible loss is up to us. 

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Rachel Reeves ‘must find billions more’ in time for Budget

Published

on

Rachel Reeves 'must find billions more' in time for Budget
PA Chancellor of the Exchequer, Rachel Reeves before addressing the Labour Party Conference.PA

Chancellor Rachel Reeves will need to come up with billions of pounds more to meet the government’s pre-election promises, according to calculations by influential think tank the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS).

The government has promised no return to “austerity” for public services and a boost to government investment, designed to kickstart growth.

But to honour those commitments the chancellor will need to “grasp the nettle” and come up with £16bn more on top of £9bn tax rises set out in the Labour manifesto, the IFS said.

The chancellor is finalising details of her first Budget, to be announced on 30 October.

Reeves will set out how she plans to meet a raft of manifesto promises against a tangle of self-imposed restrictions on borrowing, spending and debt.

Advertisement

It will be the government’s first big set-piece, an opportunity to set out its priorities and values, and to reset the political tone after a backlash over clothing and hospitality donations.

There is an expectation that more of the tax burden will fall on higher earners, following the government’s surprise decision to limit winter fuel payments to the poorest pensioners. Some also hope for an end to the two-child limit for benefit payments.

But Reeves’ first Budget comes against a backdrop of higher debt following the pandemic, higher interest payments to finance that debt and inflation that has only recently returned to normal levels. A growing and ageing population and the climate transition impose additional challenges.

The new government had inherited an “unenviable” situation with the public finances, the IFS said in its regular pre-Budget analysis of the public finances.

Advertisement

Growing pressures on health and pensions, combined with falling revenues from fuel and tobacco duties made the situation harder, but tough decisions were necessary, IFS director Paul Johnson said.

“If Ms Reeves does not grasp the nettle on 30 October, it could come back to sting her again before the next election,” Mr Johnson said.

Getty images Older man lounging in armchair with crutches to one side, young male nurse seated in another chair filling in form on a tabletGetty images

Protecting services

The IFS, working with economists at investment bank Citi, calculated how much extra revenue the chancellor would need to find to avoid sharp cuts in public services. That is based on her pledge to ensure day-to-day spending is paid for with tax revenues.

Economic forecasting is not precise; stronger than expected growth could give the government greater room for manoeuvre, while weaker growth might mean cuts were still required.

Advertisement

The IFS said on their own the £9bn tax rises already planned by the chancellor, might be enough to maintain spending at current levels, including taking inflation into account, although the forecast was so tight it was “on a knife edge”.

However, many public services including prisons, higher education and local government are struggling to meet current needs. Pressures are expected to grow, especially in social care and the NHS and the government has pledged additional healthcare staff and other reforms.

To meet that growing need without public services deteriorating and to fulfil manifesto promises, the IFS said real-term spending would need to rise in line with the size of the economy, or around 2.8%, requiring the extra £16bn in funding.

New rules

Advertisement

Spending increases that simply keep pace with inflation, or even ones that keep steady as a proportion of the size of the economy, would not be enough to transform public services, the IFS warned.

Even the larger increase remains much less generous than the 3.3% increase Rishi Sunak pledged in 2021. When Boris Johnson announced an “end to austerity” in 2020 he pledged a 4.1% increase in average year-on-year spending, the IFS said.

The new government has also pledged to boost investment. However, the chancellor has indicated she is likely to treat spending for investment as separate from day-to-day spending, and consider borrowing more to fund it.

She is also widely expected to change the way the UK’s debt burden is measured and as a result what constraints are made on government borrowing. Before the election Labour said it would stick to Conservative pledges to have debt falling as a proportion of economic output by the fifth year of the forecast.

Advertisement

The IFS said increased investment was an important component in addressing the UK’s low growth, but said “significant extra borrowing to fund that investment would be risky”.

The UK had elevated debt levels, substantial borrowing and a current account deficit, meaning it imports more than it exports, which left it more vulnerable than the euro area or the US over borrowing pressures.

“Some additional investment may therefore need to be financed through higher taxes,” the IFS said.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Money

‘Dream come true’ Amazon shoppers flock to grab huge Nestle chocolate box with 69 chocolate bars at 29p each

Published

on

'Dream come true' Amazon shoppers flock to grab huge Nestle chocolate box with 69 chocolate bars at 29p each

AMAZON shoppers have flocked to grab a huge Nestle chocolate box where bars are less than 30p each.

The 1.36kg selection box was described as a “dream come true” by fans who had rushed to nab the amazing deal.

Nestle's Big Biscuit Box contains 1.36kg of chocolate for less than £20

1

Nestle’s Big Biscuit Box contains 1.36kg of chocolate for less than £20Credit: Amazon

The Nestlé Big Biscuit Box contains a range of “amazing” chocolate biscuits including KitKats, Blue Ribands, and Toffee Crisps.

Advertisement

In light of the major saving, more than 5000 purchases of the product were made in the past month alone.

The selection box normally costs £21.78 but some lucky shoppers managed to secure 36 per cent off the listed price today.

The set was selling for just £13.99, meaning shoppers got the 69 chocolate biscuit bars for around 20p each.

However, following this rapid buying period, the price has already reverted upwards again, and is now at £19.85.

Advertisement

With this new 9% saving, the biscuits work out to a still fantastic 29p per bar.

The KitKats in this selection come in three different flavours: Milk Chocolate, Orange Milk Chocolate, and Dark.

The Nestlé Big Biscuit Box currently has a 4.5 star rating on Amazon.

Arthur said: “From the moment I laid eyes on the Nestle KitKat and Friends Big Biscuit Box, I knew I was in for a treat.

Advertisement

“This colossal treasure trove, boasting a staggering 69 chocolate biscuit bars spanning KitKat, Blue Riband, Toffee Crisp, and more, is a dream come true for any chocolate aficionado.

Shoppers beg Cadbury’s to bring back 2005 recipe on iconic bar – as they moan current one ‘tastes like candle wax’

“Weighing in at an impressive 1.357kg, this bulk chocolate box is not just a purchase; it’s an investment in pure joy.”

Brian commented: “I bought the item for myself and to offer to my friends when they came round the selection was excellent the enjoyment it was fantastic I love keeping my chocolate in my fridge as when you eat it it melts slowly and it wasn’t that expensive.”

Stuart posted: “The Nestlé KitKat and Friends Big Biscuit Box is a delightful assortment of some of Nestlé’s most beloved chocolate biscuits.

Advertisement

“Perfect for sharing in the office, at home, or during gatherings, this box offers a variety of flavour’s and textures that cater to different tastes.”

Julie wrote: “The selection was lovely. They all tasted amazing. All very good quality. Good variety. Had to hide them from Grandchildren as wanted to eat them all at once.”

Paddy added: “Loved this mixture of chocolates it’s great value for money and perfect for my morning/afternoon coffee breaks…”

However, one shopper said: “I’ve ordered this many times but was very disappointed with this last box as the contents have changed – had I realised this I would not have ordered them as it’s mainly KitKats now.”

Advertisement

How to save money on chocolate

WE all love a bit of chocolate from now and then, but you don’t have to break the bank buying your favourite bar.

Consumer reporter Sam Walker reveals how to cut costs…

Go own brand – if you’re not too fussed on flavour and just want to supplant your chocolate cravings, you’ll save by going for supermarket’s own brand bars.

Advertisement

Shop around – if you’ve spotted your favourite variety at the supermarket, make sure you check if it’s cheaper elsewhere.

Websites like Trolley.co.uk let you compare prices on products across all the major chains to see if you’re getting the best deal.

Look out for yellow stickers – supermarket staff put yellow, and sometimes orange and red, stickers on to products to show they’ve been reduced.

They usually do this if the product is coming to the end of its best before date or the packaging is slightly damaged.

Advertisement

Buy bigger bars – most of the time, but not always, chocolate is cheaper per 100g the larger the bar.

So if you’ve got the appetite, and you were going to buy a hefty amount of chocolate anyway, you might as well go bigger.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Why Reach journalists are being asked to write up to eight articles per day

Published

on

Why Reach journalists are being asked to write up to eight articles per day

The editorial director of Reach’s Live network of websites has described page views as “the best thing we’ve got right now” amid a drive to increase the number of stories they publish.

Paul Rowland wrote in an email to staff on 27 September that article volumes were being talked about “a lot in newsrooms at the moment” and blamed, in part, the volatility from previously huge traffic referrers like Google and Facebook.

A separate email, sent by Birmingham Live editor Graeme Brown last month, suggested journalists should file at least eight stories per day unless they were newsgathering outside of the office.

As first quoted by Hold The Front Page, Brown said: “We need to make more of shifts where people are not going out as drivers of volume. In practice, if you’re on a general shift and you’re not on a job, it should be at least eight stories a shift.”

Press Gazette understands this can vary hugely depend on whether the role is court reporter or affiliate writer, for example.

Advertisement


However Brown has since revised the target to around five stories “on a normal reporting shift” with up to eight on a “live or weekend shift” in response to feedback from the newsroom, Press Gazette can reveal.

Content from our partners
Advertisement

Brown wrote in a follow-up email on 2 October that he understood the concerns but “this is about better connecting you all with the issue. Page views are our currency and there was a time we were getting 50% of our traffic from Facebook – now it is more like 5%. We get a fraction of the PVs we used to from, say, a local murder and this is the most plausible way I can see to address that.”

He continued: “We’ll be expecting more volume and are more likely to be focusing on a higher number of quick turnaround stories. On a live or weekend shift we might expect a reporter to produce closer to eight stories, whereas on a normal reporting shift it might be closer to five.

“It’s not an absolute – if you want to write something you think is brilliant and demands a whole day, talk to your manager who can adjudicate. In general, we need to be managing time efficiently.”

Reach editorial director’s email to staff about importance of page views

Rowland’s email sought to explain why page views are still key to Reach even as other publishers focus more on loyalty and engagement metrics.

Advertisement

Rowland said: “Ultimately, this is all about building sustainable newsrooms, and in the here and now that means making sure we’re driving enough page views to fund our journalism.

“Going forward, there’s a lot of working happening to diversify our revenue streams – be it through affiliates, social video, podcasts, e-commerce or other routes that haven’t even emerged yet – but in the meantime we need to make sure we’re bringing in the funds that will support the business to continue developing and transforming the way we engage readers as the digital media landscape changes.

“The way we do that right now is through page views. It may not be a perfect metric, but as a directly monetisable digital unit, it’s the best thing we’ve got right now. And at the risk of reducing journalism to pure maths, the page views we generate are a compound of the number of articles we produce, and the number of times that each one is read.

“That might seem like a complete statement of the obvious, but it’s an important thing to confront when we think about the things that we need to do to fund our journalism. To increase page views, we need to increase either the number of articles we produce, or the number of people who read each one (or both).

Advertisement

“Given the volatility we’ve seen in recent months (and years) with the big referrers, it’s hard to put any certainty around our ability to consistently increase the average number of page views each article gets.

“That’s not to say there aren’t actions we can take to influence this positively – choosing topics and formats that are optimised for a specific referrer is one route. Fostering communities of readers around events and issues so that we’ve got a captive audience hanging on our updates is another. But the constant jeopardy of the environment we operate in is that the benefit of that good work can potentially be overwhelmed by a sudden and violent downturn on one or more referrer.

“We talk about volume a lot because it’s the one variable that’s entirely within our control. But please don’t misunderstand that as me implying that it’s easy to control. It’s not. I know how much hard work is going into increasing our volume levels to where they are at the moment.

“But here’s the even harder bit – volume for volume’s sake will get us nowhere. We need to find the ways to create more opportunities for audiences to discover our content in areas where we can compete and win, and we need to do it without sacrificing the reasons our local brands exist. It’s really tough. But it’s not impossible.”

Advertisement

Rowland added that Reach sites frequently cover major breaking news events in which “every possible crumb of audience interest has been spun out into a breakout that finds readers by doing every angle, for every platform. That’s not about us ticking a volume box; it’s about providing the most comprehensive service to readers coming directly to us, and giving ourselves the best chance of more casual readers browsing for information landing with us (and hopefully returning).

“So yes, we need to publish at scale on the populist topics that can help us bring in the big numbers from Discover – the things you’ll routinely see topping Chartbeat – but we also need to generate that scale around the topics that our most loyal readers turn to us repeatedly for.”

In its half-year results published in July, Reach revealed page views were down 25% compared to H1 2023 due to the “ongoing impact of 2023’s referrer deprioritisation of news”. But it added: “Trends are improving and open market prices for mass scale programmatic advertising have stabilised.”

Data-driven revenues, which are based around Reach’s own audience data, affiliates, partnerships and e-commerce rather than programmatic advertising, now make up 45% of all digital revenues. However in the first half of 2024, print still made up 77% of the company’s total revenues.

Advertisement

[Read more: Reach reports first digital revenue growth since 2022]

In response to a Press Gazette post on X about the article target, many users shared concerns for the journalists involved.

Journalist Olivia Devereux-Evans said: “As someone who has done this… a 7-3pm shift means writing at least a story an hour, sometimes more. Sometimes I didn’t take a proper lunch break as I felt pressure to hit 8 stories and was consistently stressed about page views…”

Similarly Louis Staples said: “As someone who used to work in clickbait content farming: this puts reporters at professional and personal risk. It burns them out and leads to mistakes and a loss confidence, not to mention questionable ethical judgements in pursuit of traffic. End this model!”

Advertisement

Many of the comments also focused on the user experience on Reach’s websites which can be slow to load and hard to read due to ad clutter.

Sharing a screenshot of the Cambridgeshire Live website featuring a pop-up asking for permission to send notifications alongside advertising, journalist Alex Goy said: “And this is how those stories will be presented. The problem ain’t the volume, chums, it’s that you can barely read them.”

Another X user said: “It’s 2024. First of all Reach need to design basic news sites that work then we might actually use them. The awfulness of regional news sites means people ignore them. End of chat.”

Last week chief executive Jim Mullen told a Press Gazette event that users should see a “gradual reduction” in the number of adverts on Reach websites over the next few years because of the end to a longstanding pension fund deficit and the end of phone-hacking litigation.

Advertisement

Mullen said these financial obligations have meant “we need to put a certain amount of ads on our pages.

“All that money is paid off in 2028 so we should see a gradual reduction. We’ve already launched a new platform which has managed the latency of it, which is on some of the regional titles, the Liverpool Echo, you will notice a difference, but over the last couple of years, it was pretty packed, and that is gradually getting better now…”

Email pged@pressgazette.co.uk to point out mistakes, provide story tips or send in a letter for publication on our “Letters Page” blog

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez warns of ‘brawl’ if Kamala Harris removes Lina Khan

Published

on

Unlock the US Election Countdown newsletter for free

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has warned the Democratic party’s Wall Street donors of an “out and out brawl” if Lina Khan, the antitrust progressive who chairs the Federal Trade Commission, is removed from her post.

Ocasio-Cortez, the influential star of the party’s leftwing, suggested billionaires had been putting pressure on Kamala Harris to axe Khan if the Democratic candidate defeats Donald Trump to win the White House in November.

Advertisement

“Let me make this clear, since billionaires have been trying to play footsie with the ticket: Anyone goes near Lina Khan and there will be an out and out brawl. And that is a promise,” Ocasio-Cortez wrote in a post on X.

Khan “proves this admin fights for working people”, added Ocasio-Cortez, a US congresswoman from New York. “It would be terrible leadership to remove her.”

Ocasio-Cortez’s warning shot comes as Harris mounts a charm offensive on Wall Street and tries to persuade donors that she would be more moderate than President Joe Biden, whose antitrust platform and appointment of officials such as Khan has frustrated many in the business community.

The Financial Times reported last week that finance executives close to Harris said she had reassured them that she could appoint new officials to the FTC and Securities and Exchange Commission.

Advertisement

Ocasio-Cortez’s comments also point to a brewing dispute within the Democratic party over the shape — and ideological bent — of a potential Harris administration.

A Democratic donor said that the US congresswoman was entitled to her view but would not be calling the shots if Harris won the election. “The party could not be held hostage to the radical progressive wing if it was serious about winning,” the person added.

The FTC declined to comment on Ocasio-Cortez’s post. Harris’s campaign did not immediately respond to a request for comment. 

The congresswoman’s post cited comments on Khan made by businessman Mark Cuban, a former supporter of Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump turned vocal advocate for Harris.

Advertisement

The billionaire former star of the popular reality television programme Shark Tank told an event on Tuesday that Harris should replace the FTC chief if she becomes president. “If it were me, I wouldn’t” keep Khan on, Cuban said.

Bernie Sanders, the progressive senator from Vermont, also criticised Cuban’s comments. He wrote on X that Khan, who has sued to block mergers, challenged Big Tech players such as Amazon and Meta, and focused on worker protections, was “the best FTC chair in modern history”.

Cuban on Tuesday criticised Khan’s scrutiny of technology companies and artificial intelligence.

“We have to win globally from a defence perspective and from an economic perspective,” he said. “And by trying to break up the biggest tech companies, you risk our ability to be the best in artificial intelligence in the world.” Cuban has invested in AI companies.

Advertisement

An FTC spokesperson responded: “History has shown that extreme consolidation weakens our national defence by concentrating risk and that unchecked monopolies reduce innovation since paradigm shifting breakthroughs come from disruptive outsiders, not large incumbents.”

Cuban on Wednesday said in an email that he had not discussed Khan’s future “at all” with Harris’s campaign.

“I don’t make policy for the campaign, I give my suggestions and feedback,” he added. “Some they listen to. Some they don’t. All final decisions are made by the VP.”

The FTC in January launched an investigation of multibillion-dollar investments into generative AI, including Microsoft’s alliance with OpenAI. Khan has warned against dominant companies “distorting innovation and undermining fair competition” in AI. 

Cuban praised Khan’s crackdown on pharmacy benefit managers, the middlemen within the pharmaceutical industry who negotiate rebates from wholesale prices with drugmakers, before passing some of the discount on to consumers and pocketing the rest as profits. Cuban in 2022 launched a digital pharmacy start-up.

The FTC last month sued America’s largest PBMs over allegedly raising insulin prices artificially.

Additional reporting by James Fontanella-Khan in London

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Travel

Waterfront English town reveals £51million transformation – with new hotels, New York-style park and food market hall

Published

on

Birkenhead has revealed its £51million renovation plans

AN English town is getting a huge makeover – with New York-style gardens and new hotels.

Birkenhead in Wirral has been given £51million as part of a number of developments set to transform the town.

Birkenhead has revealed its £51million renovation plans

8

Birkenhead has revealed its £51million renovation plansCredit: wirral.gov
An abandoned railway line will be turned into a New York style park

8

Advertisement
An abandoned railway line will be turned into a New York style parkCredit: wirral.gov
The project will take around 20 years

8

The project will take around 20 yearsCredit: wirral.gov

Also dubbed the ‘capital of Wirral’ the Birkenhead 2040 Framekwork is an ambitious project transforming the town in the next 20 years.

One of the new attractions includes turning an abandoned railway line into a £15million park, similar to one in New York.

The train line is said to be one of the oldest stretches of track in the world despite the fact it closed in the 1990s.

Advertisement

Inspired by High Line in New York, Dock Brand Park would be a “world-class” park with an urban garden village at the end, home to walking routes and wildlife.

Read more on english towns

Chair of Wirral Council’s Economy, Regeneration and Housing Committee, Tony Jones, said: “Dock Branch Park is one of the many exciting proposals we have for bringing true regeneration across Wirral’s Left Bank, from Bromborough to New Brighton.

“Dock Branch Park will be one of the centrepieces of the revitalisation of Birkenhead.”

New hotels will also be part of the project, as well as a new event space with live music, cafe and bar.

Advertisement

More food and drink venues, swimming pools and green spaces are part of the plans.

There is also a new £14million Birkenhead Market which will be an indoor-outdoor attraction.

Inside the 33,000sqft venue will be food stores including bakeries, coffee stands and fresh fruit, veg and meat stalls.

Discovering UK’s Most Picturesque Towns

There will also be shops selling books, as well as a dining area with food stands and a bar.

Advertisement

Both indoor and outdoor seating is part of the plan too.

Wirral Council Leader Cllr Paul Stuart said: “We will shape the new market in its new location, a space that holds great potential to perfectly meet the current and future needs of our vibrant shopping area,.”

Birkenhead waterfront will also undergo renovations, with new paths and improvements that have the ‘best views’ of the city.

The plans have said it is the “Brooklyn to the New York skyline”.

Advertisement
A new market will be part of the town centre

8

A new market will be part of the town centreCredit: wirral.gov
Inside will be food stalls, shops and bars

8

Inside will be food stalls, shops and barsCredit: wirral.gov
The waterfront will also be transformed being compared to Brooklyn

8

The waterfront will also be transformed being compared to BrooklynCredit: wirral.gov

The fund also includes building 1,500 new homes well as a school and commercial space.

Advertisement

Also in Wirral is New Brighton, which once rivalled Blackpool.

Once also home to the UK’s tallest tower and biggest lido – both of which have been removed – there are hopes to restore it as a tourist destination.

A new floating lido as well as beach park and 300-room hotel could soon open.

New pathways and open spaces will add to the waterfront which has the 'best city views'

8

Advertisement
New pathways and open spaces will add to the waterfront which has the ‘best city views’Credit: wirral.gov
Houses, hotels and parks are all part of the plans

8

Houses, hotels and parks are all part of the plansCredit: wirral.gov

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 WordupNews.com