Connect with us

News

US may seek Google breakup over search monopoly

Published

on

Reuters Videos

STORY: Google could be forced to break up.

The U.S. said Tuesday it may ask a judge to make the search giant sell off businesses like its Chrome browser and Android phone operating system.

It all flows from an August court ruling, when Google was found to be operating an illegal monopoly in search.

Now the Justice Department is considering what penalties to demand, with a breakup among the options.

Advertisement

Another would be to require Google to supply rivals with the indexes, data and models it uses for search functions.

Officials could also seek to stop payments the firm makes to have its search engine pre-installed or set as the standard option for new devices.

Google pays billions every year to companies like Apple to secure default status for its products.

The proposed fixes will also extend to ensuring the firm doesn’t build a new monopoly in artificial intelligence.

Advertisement

Google denies all the charges against it, and plans to appeal the case.

But some of the possible remedies have previously been backed by smaller rivals like search engine DuckDuckGo.

Reviews site Yelp, which sued Google over search in August, says spinning off its Chrome browser and AI services should be considered.

Now the Justice Department is expected to submit more detailed proposals to the court by November 20.

Advertisement

Google will have a month after that to put forward its own ideas.

Whatever happens, it’s likely to shrink the firm’s revenues – and reshape how Americans use the internet.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

News

OpenAI says SearchGPT will not share ad revenue with publishers

Published

on

OpenAI says SearchGPT will not share ad revenue with publishers

OpenAI’s head of media partnerships has said the company does not currently intend to share ad revenue from its SearchGPT product with publishers whose content it surfaces.

Virtually addressing the Twipe Digital Growth Summit in Brussels on Monday, Varun Shetty said the company believed its prototype search engine, SearchGPT, will fairly compensate publishers through “significant incremental traffic from new audiences”.

But he added that the matter was “an evolving space for us right now” and that it was in OpenAI’s interests to provide enough value to stop publishers opting out of appearing in SearchGPT results.

[Read more: OpenAI testing prototype search engine with news publishers]

“We think there’s an opportunity here to drive significant incremental traffic from new audiences,” Shetty said, responding to a Press Gazette question. “And then we’ll have to see if that is valuable enough to partners to remain opted-in.

Advertisement


“This will be something that we’re thinking a lot about, but I think we’re going to start with this proposition of traffic.”

Content from our partners
Advertisement

Google chief executive Sundar Pichai has made a similar claim with regard to Google’s AI Overviews, claiming the bot-generated summaries drive healthy click-through rates despite evidence they make publishers less visible in search results.

In contrast to Google and OpenAI, AI-powered search engine business Perplexity has revenue sharing agreements in place with publishers including Time and Der Spiegel, and last week Microsoft announced it will begin paying publishers whose content is surfaced by its productivity assistant Copilot.

Shetty used his appearance at the conference, which was attended by delegates from publishers including Axel Springer, The Economist, Die Zeit and Denmark’s JP/Politiken Media Group, to argue that the relationship between publishers and the new tech giant should be mutually beneficial.

He said: “What we want to do is really balance the user experience of wanting to find an answer about recent events or information with the publisher need to be correctly attributed, sourced and have traffic driven back to their sites.”

Advertisement

This compromise, he said, had informed the design of SearchGPT, which is presently in an experimental phase and only accessible to around 10,000 users in the US. Shetty said the company intended to fully fold SearchGPT into flagship product ChatGPT “by the end of the year”.

SearchGPT answers user queries in natural language, rather than with a series of links like a traditional search engine, and indicates the sources of its information with icons beneath the response.

A slide from an OpenAI presentation at the Twipe Digital Growth Summit in Brussels in October 2024 demonstrating how publishers will appear in SearchGPT. Small icons bearing logos of The Sun and The Times can be seen beneath the main search result.
A slide from an OpenAI presentation at the Twipe Digital Growth Summit in Brussels in October 2024 demonstrating how publishers will appear in SearchGPT. Small icons bearing logos of The Sun and The Times can be seen beneath the main search result. Picture: Press Gazette

“This is the core experience that we’re building, and this is where you can see the balance that we’re trying to get right between users and publishers,” Shetty said.

“If you click on the sources and more tab, you start to see a large link rail of citations and sources.

“Again, what we’re trying to do here is create as much surface area as possible for people to have an information-dense experience, but also to create opportunities for click-through.”

Advertisement

OpenAI believes that people “aren’t satisfied with just seeing a collection of links – they actually do want an answer”, Shetty said.

But he added: “We do believe that they want to go further, that they want to click through to verify what they’re seeing, that they want to click through because they’re curious and want to learn more, and that they click through because they trust the source that they’re seeing and they want to just get a deeper understanding of the information that’s being presented to them.”

‘The burden is on us to figure out how to create enough value so you want to be part of this ecosystem’

Shetty, a former executive director of strategy and business development at The New York Times and a director of business development and product partnerships at Meta, said publishers may opt out of appearing in SearchGPT results if they wish and that they do not need to be an OpenAI partner to opt in.

“We care deeply about giving publishers control over how they appear within SearchGPT, or if they appear at all.

Advertisement

“If a publisher wants to appear within SearchGPT it just has to allow the search bot on their site. And that search bot only allows us to display content [on SearchGPT] – it does not allow us to train on the content.

“And we think that this opens up an incremental traffic opportunity for publishers without having to deal with decision-making around training or not. Again, if a publisher decides they do not want to be a part of this experience, they simply have to block the crawlers and then the burden is on us to figure out how to create enough value so you want to be part of this ecosystem.”

‘No one wants to read AI-generated news’

Shetty also used the appearance to make his case for how OpenAI can be of use to the news industry.

“No one wants to read AI-generated news”, Shetty said, “but can we make it easier for journalists to recommend stories? To find the right photos within the CMS? To create that context box that sits along the side?”

Advertisement

Other newsroom ChatGPT uses, he suggested, included using the bot to “up-level or down-level” a piece of writing “to help reach different audiences”, to translate it or to transform it from text into audio or video. 

Away from the editorial side, he suggested using a chatbot to help manage customer services for subscription businesses or to power personalised content recommendations for logged-in readers.

Several publishers who have signed deals to surface their content in ChatGPT, including Time, Vox Media and The Atlantic have gained access to OpenAI products as part of their deals.

Shetty claimed the next GPT model, due out in the next six months, will be powerful enough that it will be “agentic”, allowing users to set it a more complex task “as you would a high-performing employee” and have it return with an answer in a few days.

Advertisement

Email pged@pressgazette.co.uk to point out mistakes, provide story tips or send in a letter for publication on our “Letters Page” blog

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Travel

All UK flights cancelled to US hotspot and theme parks closed ahead of ‘worst storm in 100 years’

Published

on

All flights to Florida have been cancelled due to Hurricane Milton (stock image)

ALL flights to Florida from the UK have been cancelled after the majority of airports confirmed they would be ceasing operations this morning.

A state of emergency has been declared ahead of category 5 Hurricane Milton expected to make landfall today.

All flights to Florida have been cancelled due to Hurricane Milton (stock image)

5

All flights to Florida have been cancelled due to Hurricane Milton (stock image)Credit: Getty
Hurricane Milton is to make landfall later tonight

5

Advertisement
Hurricane Milton is to make landfall later tonight
Most airports have been forced to close

5

Most airports have been forced to closeCredit: AFP

The storm is set to be one of the worst in 100 years, President Joe Biden warned, to hit the Tampa area, with more than six million people warned to evacuate.

Disney World has closed its park until at least tomorrow, along with Universal Orlando.

And airlines including TUI, British Airways and Virgin Atlantic have been forced to cancel more flights.

Advertisement

Most airports in the state have already closed.

Read more on hurricane milton

Orlando Airport have stopped all operations, effective from 8am today.

The airport is yet to confirm when they will reopen.

Tampa Airport said on social media: “We will suspend flight operations at 9 a.m. Tuesday and reopen when safe to do so.”

Advertisement

Melbourne Orlando Airport, which TUI currently flies to, has also closed.

They said in a statement: “MLB will close to commercial flight operations at 2PM on Wednesday and will reopen at 9AM on Friday.”

Hurricane Milton strengthens to Category 5 as residents told to evacuate over storm surge fears

This has resulted in a number of cancellations from UK airlines.

This includes the following Virgin Atlantic flights:

Advertisement

Wednesday 9 October

  • VS129 – London Heathrow to Tampa
  • VS130 – Tampa to London Heathrow
  • VS074 – Orlando to Manchester
  • VS075 – Manchester to Orlando
  • VS076 – Orlando to Manchester
  • VS091 – London Heathrow to Orlando
  • VS092 – Orlando to London Heathrow
  • VS135 – London Heathrow to Orlando
  • VS136 – Orlando to London Heathrow
  • VS225 – Edinburgh to Orlando has been delayed by 23 hours and is expected to operate on October 10

Thursday 10 October

  • VS091 – London Heathrow to Orlando
  • VS129 – London Heathrow to Tampa
  • VS130 – Tampa to London Heathrow 
  • VS073 – Manchester to Orlando
  • VS074 – Orlando to Manchester
  • VS075 – Manchester to Orlando 
  • VS076 – Orlando to Manchester
  • VS091 – London Heathrow to Orlando 
  • VS092 – Orlando to London Heathrow
  • VS135 – London Heathrow to Orlando 
  • VS136 – Orlando to London Heathrow
  • VS225 – Edinburgh – Orlando has been delayed by a further 23 hours and will now operate on Friday 11 October.

A Virgin Atlantic spokesperson asked passengers to “check the status of their flights” before travelling.

Disney World is closing until at least tomorrow

5

Disney World is closing until at least tomorrowCredit: Reuters
British Airways, Virgin and TUI have been affected

5

British Airways, Virgin and TUI have been affectedCredit: Getty

British Airways has cancelled the following flights.

Advertisement

Wednesday 9 October

  • BA 2167 from London Gatwick to Tampa
  • BA 2037 from London Gatwick to Orlando
  • BA 2039 from London Gatwick to Orlando

Thursday 10 October

  • BA 2167 from London Gatwick to Tampa
  • BA 2037 from London Gatwick to Orlando
  • BA 2039 from London Gatwick to Orlando

A British Airways spokesperson said they were “adjusting flight schedules” and offering flight rebooking options or full refunds.

TUI has already cancelled a flight today, with more being ‘watched’ although are also likely to be cancelled, including:

A spokesperson said they were contacting customers directly who are affected.

Wednesday 9 October

Advertisement
  • TOM070 from London Gatwick Airport

Thursday 10 October

  • TOM742 from Glasgow Airport
  • TOM 664 from Birmingham Airport

Other airlines that operate flights from the UK to Florida include American Airlines, Delta, JetBlue, Spirit Airlines, Norse Airways and Finnair, who have also cancelled flights.

Hurricane Milton is expected to make landfall just south of the city on Wednesday night.

Storm surges of 15ft are expected, with winds up to 165mph.

The storm was upgraded back to a Category 5 hurricane on Tuesday, hours after being downgraded to a Category 4 earlier in the day.

The National Hurricane Center (NHC) said: “It will be an extremely dangerous hurricane when it reaches shore”.

Advertisement

Flight compensation rules

A look at your rights if a flight is delayed or cancelled, when your entitled to compensation and if your travel insurance can cover the costs.

What are my rights if my flight is cancelled or delayed?

Under UK law, airlines have to provide compensation if your flight arrives at its destination more than three hours late.

If you’re flying to or from the UK, your airline must let you choose a refund or an alternative flight.

Advertisement

You will be able to get your money back for the part of your ticket that you haven’t used yet.

So if you booked a return flight and the outbound leg is cancelled, you can get the full cost of the return ticket refunded.

But if travelling is essential, then your airline has to find you an alternative flight. This could even be with another airline.

When am I not entitled to compensation?

Advertisement

The airline doesn’t have to give you a refund if the flight was cancelled due to reasons beyond their control, such as extreme weather.

Disruptions caused by things like extreme weather, airport or air traffic control employee strikes or other ‘extraordinary circumstances’ are not eligible for compensation.

Some airlines may stretch the definition of “extraordinary circumstances” but you can challenge them through the aviation regulator the Civil Aviation Authority (CAA).

Will my insurance cover me if my flight is cancelled?

Advertisement

If you can’t claim compensation directly through the airline, your travel insurance may refund you.

Policies vary so you should check the small print, but a delay of eight to 12 hours will normally mean you qualify for some money from your insurer.

Remember to get written confirmation of your delay from the airport as your insurer will need proof.

If your flight is cancelled entirely, you’re unlikely to be covered by your insurance.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Should we let friends share our nanny?

Published

on

Friends who live nearby and whose children attend the same school as ours have asked if we would consider a nanny share, as both of them have to be back in the office. We’re happy to share. Our children all get along well and our nanny, who will earn more caring for four children, has said she’s happy with the new arrangement. But how does this work in practice with pay, holiday and so on? We already have her payroll and pension set up as she’s worked with us for more than a year.

Kirsty Wild
Kirsty Wild, a nanny employment and payroll expert from Nannytax.co.uk

Kirsty Wild, a nanny employment and payroll expert from payroll services provider Nannytax.co.uk, says nanny shares are increasingly popular as parents look for ways to lower the cost of childcare while getting the kind of flexibility and at-home childcare that childminders and nurseries can’t provide. One nanny looks after the children of two families at the same time, sometimes at one family’s house or alternating between their homes, so there are social benefits for the kids, too.

Under this new arrangement, your nanny will now have two employers. You must pay her separately and at least the national minimum wage each. Nanny shares are typically a win-win arrangement for everyone involved. Typically, parents pay less per hour than they would for an exclusive nanny, while nannies can increase their earnings. 

In the UK, nannies earn, on average, £15.51 per hour (gross), according to the latest Nannytax nanny salary index. That figure rises to £16.93 per hour in Greater London and the Home Counties and to £17.78 per hour in London. The minimum wage at the time of writing is £11.44 per hour for those over the age of 21. So, a nanny who cares for the children of two families will be paid at least £22.88 an hour before tax, while families can cut their childcare costs to minimum wage of £11.44.

Both of you will need employers’ liability insurance as well as separate employment contracts with the nanny and I suggest you take the time now to update your existing contract. This will be helpful if one family chooses to exit the arrangement before the other. The contract could specify a fair notice period of around four to six weeks to allow you to find another family to join the nanny share, and what the salary change would be if the nanny were to work with you exclusively again.

Advertisement

The contract should also make clear how your nanny’s annual leave is to be agreed. A fair way to work this out might be for each family to decide on one week and the nanny to decide when she takes the remainder of her leave.

As for the question of payroll, some families want to split the nanny’s tax code, which is entirely at her discretion. This makes it fairer as it prevents just one of you paying basic rate tax on all of the nanny’s earnings. However, if both families are paying a gross salary this won’t be necessary, so I would suggest you both decide on a gross rate of pay with the nanny, which also makes life easier for you when budgeting. If you use a nanny payroll provider they’ll sort all the PAYE admin for you.

Don’t forget that if you’re eligible, and your nanny is Ofsted-registered, you can both pay her through the tax-free childcare scheme.

Should I abandon my plans to move to Italy?

I have been a UK resident non-dom for 10 years and, in anticipation of the new tax rules, I am in the process of buying a house in Italy to retire to, but I understand there have been some tax changes there which may affect my plans. Should I reconsider my decision and stay in the UK?

Advertisement
Alice Pearson
Alice Pearson, a partner at accountants Mercer & Hole © Mark Sims

Alice Pearson, a partner at accountants Mercer & Hole, says that in a surprise move announced on August 7, the Italian government announced that anyone transferring their residence to Italy after August 10 2024 would pay a higher annual flat rate of tax, which has doubled from €100,000 to €200,000

This is an optional flat rate tax available to new Italian residents for the first 15 years of residence, as an alternative to paying tax on foreign-sourced income and certain capital gains.

If you were hoping to access this special tax regime when you retire to Italy, you will potentially face the increased annual charge. With this in mind, you will need to decide whether Italy continues to offer you a more favourable tax regime compared with the UK. 

UK tax rules for non-doms are also changing from April 6 2025 and you may find yourself exposed to UK tax on your worldwide income and gains for the first time. However, whether or not you will be better off under the Italian tax system depends on the scale of your income and gains, even more so now that the annual flat rate has doubled.

The main concern for many UK non-doms is around exposure to inheritance tax (IHT). It has been proposed that individuals who have been UK-resident for at least 10 years will be subject to IHT on their worldwide estate and will remain exposed for 10 years after giving up their UK residence. This again makes Italy’s flat tax system very appealing, as it exempts foreign assets from IHT.

Advertisement

However, even if you were to move to Italy in the current tax year, it is still uncertain whether you will escape the 10-year rule. It is also not yet clear how this continued UK IHT exposure would interact with the UK/Italy estate double tax treaty.

You also need to consider what it is you need to do to break UK residence and whether that is possible with your lifestyle.

Our next question

I own a second home in Cornwall that I bought 25 years ago. I am aware there are likely to be changes in the October Budget that could significantly raise tax liabilities arising from the house. Before this happens, I plan to transfer half of the property to my adult son who already spends a few weeks there each year and to whom I was planning to leave the house. I would however like to continue to spend a few weeks there each year myself — will this cause any issues with HM Revenue & Customs? Does he also need to pay for the ongoing maintenance of the house for it to be valid?

The sudden change to the Italian flat tax is a stark reminder that the tax rules in any country could change at any time and you don’t want to jump from the frying pan and into the fire — particularly before the new UK tax rules have been confirmed.

Advertisement

It is important to focus on the reason behind your decision to make the move. After a full discussion regarding their wealth, their objectives for the family and their future, many are choosing to stay in the UK and manage their exposure. You too might find you don’t need to leave the UK at all to achieve the objectives and retirement you want.

With the speed of these changes to the Italian tax rules, it is important for those who are considering a move to take advice relating to their individual wealth and circumstances, especially as the Italian parliament could make further changes to the law which are still in provisional form. 

The opinions in this column are intended for general information purposes only and should not be used as a substitute for professional advice. The Financial Times Ltd and the authors are not responsible for any direct or indirect result arising from any reliance placed on replies, including any loss, and exclude liability to the full extent.

Do you have a financial dilemma that you’d like FT Money’s team of professional experts to look into? Email your problem in confidence to money@ft.com.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Money

EBay to ban private sales of common item due to fire risks

Published

on

EBay to ban private sales of common item due to fire risks

EBAY is set to ban private sales of a popular product in the UK, citing increasing safety concerns.

The move will come into effect on October 31, with only “eligible business sellers” allowed to continue offering the item on the platform.

eBay is set to ban private sales of a popular product on its website in the UK

2

eBay is set to ban private sales of a popular product on its website in the UK
The ban comes over fears of fire risks associated to the item

2

Advertisement
The ban comes over fears of fire risks associated to the item

The clampdown focuses on e-bikes and their batteries, following a sharp rise in incidents involving battery fires.

The London Fire Brigade reported 155 e-bike fires so far this year, a jump of 78% compared to 2022.

E-bikes, equipped with electrically-assisted pedals and battery power, have surged in popularity, but their safety has come under scrutiny.

In one tragic case, a man died when a battery pack he was charging overheated and ignited, leading to a house fire.

Advertisement

Read more on banned items

The UK’s regulatory body recently classified e-bike battery packs as “dangerous products,” further intensifying calls for better consumer protection.

An eBay spokesperson said: “Consumer safety is a top priority for eBay,” adding that the firm would audit sellers to ensure they meet CE mark safety standards for listed products.

The charity Electrical Safety First has praised eBay’s decision but insists new laws are necessary to safeguard consumers across all online platforms.

A spokesperson said: “We are encouraged to see eBay take proactive steps in an attempt to reduce the risk of substandard batteries entering people’s homes, as they pose a serious risk of fire if they fail.

Advertisement

“Whilst this voluntary move is welcome, we continue to call for online marketplaces to be legally obligated to take reasonable steps to ensure products sold via their sites are safe.

“We hope the Product Regulation and Metrology Bill will mandate this.

Explosion Rocks Alloa: Major Emergency Response Deployed

“This legislation must also be used to prevent battery fires by introducing mandatory third-party certification for e-bikes, e-scooters and their batteries to stop poor quality products from entering the market.

“It should also introduce more robust standards for conversion kits and regulations for charging.“

Advertisement

The Product Regulation and Metrology Bill, currently progressing through Parliament, could eventually make these obligations law.

For now, eBay’s ban on private e-bike sales is seen as a crucial step toward reducing fire risks associated with the product.

Despite the impending restrictions, nearly 3,000 used e-bikes are still available on eBay, highlighting the challenge of managing the growing demand for these vehicles while ensuring safety.

Meanwhile, earlier this year a man was forced to flee through a bedroom window after a house erupted into flames when an e-bike battery exploded.

Advertisement

Leicestershire Fire and Rescue Service was able to confirm that a lithium battery in the ebike overheated and caused a severe fire.

The fire service reminded e-bike owners to use the correct charger, never leave the device unattended and allow the battery to cool before charging.

Elsewhere, in another tragic case, the grieving boyfriend of a model killed in a horror e-bike flat blaze told how he tried to battle through flames to save her. 

The 21-year-old was forced to jump out of a window naked when smoke billowed through his flat in London.

Advertisement

A fireball erupted through their home when on New Year’s Day 2023 when a dodgy ebike battery exploded.

The dangers of e-bikes

Last year, 11 people lost their lives to fires involving e-bikes and e-scooters, with hundreds injured as a result of the fires caused by the lithium-ion batteries.

Other victims include Sofia Duarte, who died in London on New Year’s Day 2023 at the age of 21, when a converted e-bike caught fire during the night.

Advertisement

Sofia was unable to escape the building with the fire blocking her escape route.

Alda Simoes, a friend of Ms Duarte, said: “We are out of time to save our beautiful Sofia and everyone that has passed away like her.

“But we will do everything in our power to prevent others going through what Sofia’s mum, me, family and friends are going through.

“This problem is a public safety issue that needs action from all political parties to introduce new measures to tackle the increasingly problem of e-bike battery fires.

Advertisement

“The number of these fires caused by these batteries keeps rising and we urgently need intervention to protect the public.

“Change needs to happen. There are people dying, what are we waiting for? Sofia’s death must have a purpose. If nothing changes, her death will be in vain.

“I am urging the next Government and all political parties to please, help us create change.”

On March 21, fire crews were called to an exploding e-bike on a train platform in Sutton, London, with dramatic footage showing flaming battery cells being projected from the battery across the platform.

Advertisement

Fire crews in Wakefield, West Yorkshire, were called to a property fire on April 6 following a severe fire that resulted in one person being taken to hospital with serious injuries.

The cause was deemed to be a charging e-bike.

Five others suffered minor injuries.

Four children were among six people taken to hospital due to smoke inhalation following an e-bike fire near Croydon at the beginning of April that caused serious damage to their maisonette, destroying the staircase between the first and second floor

Advertisement

Do you have a money problem that needs sorting? Get in touch by emailing money-sm@news.co.uk.

Plus, you can join our Sun Money Chats and Tips Facebook group to share your tips and stories

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Movement media must continue to fight for Palestinian liberation and against censorship

Published

on

Movement media must continue to fight for Palestinian liberation and against censorship

A bill currently making its way through Congress could kill independent media outlets like ours. 

HR 9495 is a bipartisan piece of legislation, ostensibly about allowing U.S. nationals wrongfully detained abroad to postpone their tax deadlines. The bill sounds relatively innocuous. But the legislation also includes the text of another bill that made it through the House earlier this spring that gives the Treasury secretary the ability to designate a nonprofit a “terrorist supporting organization” and strip them of their tax-exempt status.

That kind of sweeping jurisdiction should terrify anyone who cares about civil liberties. It should also especially concern readers of nonprofit media, since a bill like HR 9495 can have compounding effects. Some outlets might self-censor; organizations might spend limited funds and time defending themselves from any old hateful threat that comes their way; and donations might dry up as funders worry about whether they too could face penalties. The “terror” label is already all-powerful; it can freeze assets and spark investigations. And this bill creates a whole new category—that of the “terrorist supporting organization”—one that can poison by association alone.

HR 9495 treads on territory that’s all too familiar. It’s no secret that Muslim, Arab, and Middle Eastern groups are more likely to be painted as “terrorist supporters.” There are already indications that this bill targets specific organizations, such as American Muslims for Palestine, who have recently been on the receiving end of lawmaker vitriol and smears. Turning lawmakers’ hateful accusations into a legal framework to threaten nonprofits is unacceptable.

One could make any number of critiques of this bill. It puts a truly terrifying amount of power in the hands of a political appointee, who could easily weaponize it against any enemy of their choosing. It’s likely unconstitutional. It’s also redundant–providing material support to organizations on the U.S. list of foreign terror organizations is already illegal under existing legislation. 

Advertisement

When you look beyond this specific provision, it’s clear that HR 9495 is yet another piece of lawfare in the wider war to suffocate the Palestine solidarity movement, as well as any meaningful news coverage that could help sustain it. That movement has become more vocal as Israel’s current genocide reaches its one-year mark and more than 41,000 Palestinians are confirmed to have been killed by Israel in Gaza. (Some researchers estimate the death toll could end up being closer to 186,000.) This violence has been fueled by the U.S. political establishment. But rather than doing anything to cleanse their hands of the blood, members of Congress have instead tried to suppress information about the death count. 

Prism and Truthout have reported over the past year on the fascistic repression we have seen against both speech and collective action. Some of the ways mainstream media bosses quell dissent within their newsrooms is through the repression, firing, and systematic shunning of the journalists accurately reporting on the genocide and the marginalization of Palestinian-American and Muslim journalists who are censored or hindered from doing their jobs because of their identities. In an op-ed published across multiple movement media outlets, a collective of movement journalists wrote:

On U.S. soil, journalists and media makers are being fired or pushed out of the profession for their advocacy. Jewish journalist Emily Wilder was fired from the Associated Press (AP) in 2021 after conservative activists targeted her for pro-Palestinian social media posts written prior to her employment with the AP. In 2022, The New York Times fired Palestinian journalist Hosam Salem in Gaza, citing his personal Facebook page that he used to speak out against the occupation he lives under. Multiple journalists have also resigned or canceled contracts with The New York Times in part because of its Gaza coverage, and in late October, Artforum fired editor-in-chief David Velasco for his participation in an open letter supporting Palestinian liberation. eLife editor-in-chief Michael Eisen was fired in October for retweeting an article from the satirical paper The Onion. These acts go hand in hand with the recent cancellation of campus groups at Brandeis University and Columbia University that are critical of the Israeli occupation and siege in Gaza.

These threats of censorship are worldwide. Online, companies like Meta systematically suppress news from and about Palestinians. In Germany, chanting “from the river to the sea” can land you in court; anyone who uses the phrase on social media can be denied citizenship. In the U.K., journalists and activists already face charges under legislation known as the Terrorism Act 2000 that human rights groups call vague and overly broad. 

But nowhere is the threat to Palestinians—and anyone who wants to tell the truth about Israeli aggression—greater than in Palestine. Media workers make up a small fraction of the number of Palestinians killed in Israel’s genocide—at least 130 of them in Gaza since last October, but experts say they have been deliberately targeted alongside medical and aid workers. 

Advertisement

This includes several Al Jazeera journalists as Israel tries to stop one of the few media organizations willing and able to broadcast the truth about Palestine, from Palestine. Baseless “terror” accusations often accompany the killing of journalists. Earlier this year when Israel assassinated Ismail Al-Ghoul–one of the last to report from Gaza’s north–the drone strike was so severe that it decapitated the Al Jazeera journalist. Afterward, an official Israeli military social media account boasted about his death. “ELIMINATED,” the post said, while also baselessly smearing Al-Ghoul as a terrorist. 

Death is the most extreme consequence of this unfounded, wildly racist terror labeling. But it’s not the only way journalism is silenced. The Knesset justified kicking Al Jazeera out of Israel earlier this year by citing concerns over state security. Israel then expanded its reach into the occupied West Bank, raiding Al Jazeera’s offices there, too. Journalists continued to broadcast with guns trained on them, and bureau chief Walid al-Omari narrated the raid as an Israeli soldier’s hand covered the camera lens. According to al-Omari, the military order accused Al Jazeera of “incitement to and support of terrorism.”

This terror framing and the threat of censorship that accompanies it is nothing new. Its fever pitch was mostly during the early 2000s when the mainstream press happily marched along to the beat of war drums pounded by George W. Bush’s lackeys (some of whom now maintain plum positions in the crumbling journalism industry, a tragedy of its own). 

But the roots of this dangerous behavior go even further back. “Terrorism” made its first appearance in a federal statute back in 1969 when Congress required the United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA) that provides aid to Palestinian refugees to deny assistance to “any refugee who is receiving military training as a member of the so-called Palestine Liberation Army … or who has engaged in any act of terrorism.” The “terror” framing has always been steeped in anti-Palestinian racism. Now, decades later, it has spread to become a linchpin of our world order.

Advertisement

Where has this all-encompassing “terror” fiction taken us? Tens of millions of people have been displaced and around 4.5 million people have died, directly or indirectly, thanks to the post-9/11 wars. But the last year has unleashed unimaginable levels of violence.

In Gaza, Israel has killed 2,100 infants and toddlers in its genocide. Earlier this month when Israel dropped dozens of 2,000-pound bombs on a residential neighborhood in Lebanon, the U.S. framed the assassination of Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah as a “measure of justice.” In the West Bank, soldiers lay siege on entire cities and accompanied settlers on murderous rampages to ethnically cleanse Palestinians from their villages. And Israel kills international observers who dare demonstrate their solidarity. Military officials and members of the U.S. political establishment justify these actions by invoking a bogeyman of “terror.”

As our colleagues in Palestine face down arrest, repression, and the barrels of many guns, they continue to hold power to account in service of liberation for their people. We’ll maintain our solidarity with them. No threat of censorship can change that. 

Universities in Gaza are reduced to rubble. Universities in the West Bank are subject to military raids while their scholars languish in solitary confinement. And universities in the U.S. purchase drones and rifles for police crackdowns on campus protests. 

As those protests continue, unbowed by guns and threats of expulsion or arrest, the state tries new methods to cast aspersions on students’ righteous indignation. Security officials make specious claims tying the protests to Iran. Elected officials say protesters are in the service of Russia and China. They can never imagine or admit that the actual threat to their violent status quo isn’t some foreign plot, but the determined empathy of the people they purportedly represent. 

Advertisement

When claims from the Biden administration aren’t baseless, they’re downright absurd. Israel is “escalating to de-escalate.” The mind-numbing phrase “defensive weaponry” has entered the lexicon. And when it comes to defense, Biden administration officials essentially say only one side has the right to it. 

And then, rather than questioning these claims, or doing anything else that might hold Israeli or American power to account, most Western corporate media outlets instead run cover for the state. The institutions doing the necessary, unsettling, and bureaucratic work of keeping count of the dead become “Hamas-run ministries.” Neighborhoods become “Hezbollah strongholds.” Invasions are “ground maneuvers,” while genocide, ethnic cleansing, and occupation are erased from style guides. 

A recent piece at In These Times republishing the work of June Jordan and Toni Morrison and featuring an introduction by In These Times print editor Sherell Barbee discusses the power of our voices and the need for coalition-building. As Barbee notes, “A freedom struggle is being waged, and fascism feeds on silence.” Systems of oppression are maintained by silence, the obfuscation of information, and the amplification of voices of occupation and imperialism. And as noted in an op-ed published by Prism, “The U.S. commits atrocities across the globe and calls it freedom. The rest of the Western world bows to the U.S., and together, these Western nation-states, with Israel as their creation, dictate who is worthy of humanity and who isn’t. And the U.S. media largely falls in line.” It’s up to movement journalists and Media Against Apartheid and Displacement to fight back against these injustices. 

It is not enough during such grave horrors to simply change the conversation. Nothing will ever be enough until we see real freedom for Palestine and beyond. As our colleagues in Palestine face down arrest, repression, and the barrels of many guns, they continue to hold power to account in service of liberation for their people. We’ll maintain our solidarity with them. No threat of censorship can change that. 

Advertisement

News organizations accept broad censorship guidelines from the Israeli government. Press embed with the Israeli military as they attack everywhere from Gaza to Yemen, in pitiful displays of access journalism. Debunked claims about babies beheaded on Oct. 7 are never corrected for the world to see, while real videos of decapitated Palestinian children in Gaza get little to no mention. The disingenuous Israeli claims about Hamas using “human shields” are repeated to no end, but when Israel is on the other end of a missile, reporters are quick to point out the military infrastructure located in densely populated Tel Aviv without a whiff of irony. The longstanding disregard for Palestinian, Arab, and Muslim life has never been so visible, open, and normalized.

From the earliest days of Israel’s genocide, it was clear that the media would manufacture consent for whatever would come next. Last November, the newly formed Movement Media Alliance convened and decided to build a crucial resource to push back against censorship of movements for liberation and how mainstream media manufactures consent for Israeli colonial expansion and genocide. 

We built Media Against Apartheid and Displacement (MAAD), a website to provide readers with articles from trustworthy, accurate, and independent sources reporting on the colonization and occupation of Palestine, the genocide in Gaza, the U.S. and Western backing of Israel, and the movements fighting for Palestinian liberation. As our work expanded this year so too did the number of organizations and outlets who joined MAAD, which now include Prism, Truthout, In These Times, Mondoweiss, Palestine Square, Haymarket Books, The Real News Network, The Forge, Waging Nonviolence, The Dig, The Kansas City Defender, Briarpatch magazine, Baltimore Beat, Hammer & Hope, Scalawag, Convergence Magazine, The Public Source, The Objective, The Polis Project, and Analyst News.

Coming together as a collective of media-makers under a common mission is unprecedented, but it is a necessary endeavor. As Truthout noted, corporate media has spent many decades denying Palestinians’ humanity, both implicitly and explicitly, by deploying the mainstream myth of “objectivity” to silence Palestinian journalists

Advertisement

While it seems like we’re on the precipice of some fresh, unimaginable horror each day, none of this is new–not Israel’s expansionist aggression that has lasted for more than 75 years, not the attacks on solidarity activists, and not the targeting of media outlets for performing the most basic functions of a free press. Those of us in Media Against Apartheid and Displacement have long known that our own freedom is intimately tied to the liberation of Palestine. 

Creative Commons License

Republish our articles for free, online or in print, under a Creative Commons license.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Business

India’s belated oil rush

Published

on

The head of KPMG US says the industry urgently needs to make it easier to become an accountant, and the EU is suing Hungary’s government over a new security law it says is in breach of citizens’ fundamental rights. Plus, India races to extract as much oil as possible while there remains a market for crude.

Mentioned in this podcast:

KPMG US head says the industry urgently needs to make it easier to become an accountant

India in rush to boost oil production before energy transition

Advertisement

EU sues Hungary over new security law

The FT News Briefing is produced by Niamh Rowe, Fiona Symon, Sonja Hutson, Kasia Broussalian and Marc Filippino. Additional help from Michela Tindera, Breen Turner, Sam Giovinco, Peter Barber, Michael Lello, David da Silva and Gavin Kallmann. Our engineer is Joseph Salcedo. Topher Forhecz is the FT’s executive producer. The FT’s global head of audio is Cheryl Brumley. The show’s theme song is by Metaphor Music.

Read a transcript of this episode on FT.com

View our accessibility guide.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 WordupNews.com