Connect with us

NewsBeat

Couples wed in a riot of colour as same-sex marriage becomes legal

Published

on

Couples wed in a riot of colour as same-sex marriage becomes legal
Jonathan Head, Thanyarat Doksone and Panisa Aemocha

Watch: Couples say ‘I do’ as Thailand legalises same-sex marriage

When Thailand’s long-awaited equal marriage law came into effect on Thursday, police officer Pisit “Kew” Sirihirunchai hoped to be among the first in line to marry his long-term partner Chanatip “Jane” Sirihirunchai.

And he was – they were the sixth couple to register their union at one of Bangkok’s grandest shopping malls, in an event city officials helped organise to celebrate this legal milestone.

Hundreds of couples across Thailand received marriage certificates on Thursday, breaking into smiles or tearing up over the moment they had dreamed of for so long.

Advertisement

It was a pageant of colours and costumes as district officials hosted parties with photo booths and free cup cakes – one Bangkok district was giving air tickets to the first couple who registered their marriage there.

“The rainbow flag is flying high over Thailand,” Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra wrote on Facebook from Davos where she is attending the World Economic Forum.

Activsts said they were hoping to cross the 1,448-mark for registrations by the end of Thursday – 1448 is the clause in the Thai Civil Code covering the definition of marriage.

“We have been ready for such a long time,” Pisit said. “We have just been waiting for the law to catch up and support us.”

Advertisement
Lulu Luo/BBC Pisit "Kew" Sirihirunchai (L) in police uniform and his partner Chanatip "Jane" Sirihirunchai in a red suit smile while holding their marriage certificatesLulu Luo/BBC

Pisit “Kew” Sirihirunchai (L) and his partner Chanatip “Jane” Sirihirunchai smile while holding their marriage certificates

The two men have been together for seven years. Eager to formalise their relationship, they had previously been to a Buddhist monk to give them an auspicious new last name they can share – Sirihirunchai. They had also asked local officials to issue a letter of intent, which they both signed, pledging to get married.

But they said having their partnership recognised under Thai law is what they had been waiting for: “This is perfect for us. The law that protects our rights.”

Until now, official documents listed Pisit and Chanatip as brothers. That way they could be a family in the eyes of the law. A marriage certificate means LGBTQ+ couples now have the same rights as any other couple to get engaged and married, to manage their assets, to inherit and to adopt children.

They can also make decisions about medical treatment if their partner becomes ill and incapacitated, or extend financial benefits – such as Pisit’s government pension – to their spouse.

Advertisement

“We want to build a future together – build a house, start a small business together, maybe a café,” he adds, making a list of all that the law has enabled. “We want to build our future together and to take care of each other.”

Lulu Luo/ BBC A couple tears up while registering their marriageLulu Luo/ BBC

Ploynaplus Chirasukon and Kwanporn Kongpetch – the first couple to be married at the Bangkok mall – said they were waiting 17 years for this day
Lulu Luo/ BBC Photos couples hanging at the venueLulu Luo/ BBC

Hundreds of couples are registering their marriages across Thailand today

The law, which passed in both houses of parliament in June last year before being endorsed by the Thai king in September, is a big step for LGBTQ+ rights.

Thailand remains an outlier in Asia in recognising marriage equality – only Nepal and Taiwan have legalised same-sex unions.

It’s one reason why Aki Uryu, who is Japanese, moved to Bangkok to be with her partner. She said life is difficult for the LGBTQ+ community back home: “In Thailand, I can hold hands with my partner, walk together. No one says anything. It’s just different. It feels right.”

Advertisement

After the two women married on Thursday, Aki said: “It is like I have started my new life.”

Watching them celebrate, along with so many other couples in a Bangkok mall, was Mr Zhang, a gay Chinese man who did not want to reveal his first name.

“We’re excited, we’re also very jealous,” he said. “Thailand is so close to China, but in another sense it’s so far away.”

And yet, even in Thailand, with its famed tolerance towards LGBTQ+ people, activists say it took a sustained campaign to win legal recognition.

Advertisement

A long wait

“We’ve been waiting for this day for 18 years – the day everyone can recognise us openly, when we no longer need to be evasive or hide,” 59-year-old Rungtiwa Thangkanopast, who will marry her partner of 18 years in May, told the BBC earlier this week.

She had been in a marriage, arranged by her family, to a gay man, who later died. She had a daughter, through IVF, but after her husband’s death began spending time, and later helping run, one of the first lesbian pubs in Bangkok. Then she met Phanlavee, who’s now 45 and goes by her first name only.

On Valentine’s Day 2013 the two women went to the Bang Rak district office in central Bangkok to ask to be officially married – a popular place for marriage registration because the name in Thai means “Love Town”.

Advertisement

This was the time when LGBTQ+ couples began challenging the official view of marriage as an exclusively heterosexual partnership by attempting to get marriage certificates at district offices.

There were around 400 heterosexual couples waiting with them on that day. Rungtiwa and Phanlavee were refused, and the Thai media mocked their effort, using derogatory slang for lesbians.

Rungtiwa Thangkanopast Rungtiwa in a white wedding gown and Phanlavee in a white suit with a pink corsage. Both are smiling in a lawn in front of a stately white building.Rungtiwa Thangkanopast

Rungtiwa (R) and Phanlavee are marrying in May but they took part in a government-sponsored event to raise awarness about marriage equality

Still, activists managed to persuade the government to consider changing the marriage laws. A proposed civil partnership bill was put before parliament, offering some official recognition to same-sex couples, but not the same legal rights as heterosexual couples.

A military coup in 2014 which deposed the elected government interrupted the movement. It would be another decade before full marriage equality was approved by parliament, in part because of the rise of young, progressive political parties that championed the cause.

Advertisement

Their message resonated with Thais – and attitudes too had changed. By this time, same-sex marriage was legalised in many Western countries and same-sex love had become normalised in Thai culture too.

Such was the shift in favour of the law that it was passed last year by a thumping majority of 400 votes to just 10 against. Even in the notoriously conservative senate only four opposed the law.

And couples like Rungtiwa and Phanleeva now have their chance to have their love for each other recognised, without the risk of public derision.

“With this law comes the legitimacy of our family,” Rungtiwa says, “We’re no longer viewed as weirdos just because our daughter isn’t being raised by heterosexual parents.”

Advertisement
Rungtiwa Thangkanopast Rungtiwa and Phanlavee pose in the background as their daughter takes a selfie with them Rungtiwa Thangkanopast

Rungtiwa says the equal marriage law finally recognises their family

The new law takes out gender-specific terms like man, woman, husband and wife from 70 sections of the Thai Civil Code covering marriage, and replaces them with neutral terms like individual and spouse.

However, there are still dozens of laws in the Thai legal code which have not yet been made gender-neutral, and there are still obstacles in the way of same-sex couples using surrogacy to have a family.

Parents are still defined under Thai law as a mother and a father. The law also does not yet allow people to use their preferred gender on official documents; they are still stuck with their birth gender. These are areas where activists say they will still need to keep pushing for change.

And it is especially significant for older couples, who have had to ride out the shifts in attitude.

Advertisement

“I really hope people will put away the old, stereotypical ideas that gay men cannot have true love,” said Chakkrit “Ink” Vadhanavira.

He and his partner Prinn, both in their 40s, have been together for 24 years.

Benjamin Begley/ BBC Chakkrit (R) and Prinn smiling with Prinn's arm around Chakkrit's shoulderBenjamin Begley/ BBC

Chakkrit (R) and Prinn have been together for more than two decades

“The two of us have proved that we genuinely love each other through thick and thin for more than 20 years,” Chakkrit said. “We have been ready to take care of each other since our first day together. We are no different from heterosexual couples.”

While Chakkrit’s parents quickly accepted their partnership, it took Prinn’s parents seven years before they could do so.

Advertisement

The couple also wanted to share the production business they ran together, and other assets, as a couple, so they asked Prinn’s parents to adopt Chakkrit officially, giving him the same family name. Prinn says the new law has brought welcome legal clarity to them.

“For example, right now when a same sex couple buy something together – a large item – they cannot share ownership of it,” said Prinn. “And one of us passes away, what both have us have earned together cannot be passed on to the other. That’s why marriage equality is very significant.”

Today, said Prinn, both sets of parents treat them as they would just like any other married children.

And when they had relationship problems like any other couple, their parents helped them.

Advertisement

“My dad even started reading gay magazines to understand me better. It was quite cute to see that.”

Additional reporting by Lulu Luo, Paweena Ninbut and Ryn Jirenuwat in Bangkok

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

NewsBeat

Unpaid internship access ‘unfair’ to working class, students say

Published

on

Unpaid internship access 'unfair' to working class, students say
Maia Davies & Alex Boyd

BBC News

BBC Handout photo of Erin Cruickshank smiling at the camera, wearing a white shirtBBC

Erin, a student in Scotland, said she has had to turn down unpaid opportunities as they would’ve left her “worse off” financially

Unpaid and low-paid internships are “unfair” to working class graduates, students say, as a new study suggests that these opportunities increasingly favour those from a middle class background.

Research from the Sutton Trust, a social mobility charity, says the gap between the two demographics is growing – driven by employers continuing to underpay interns, and giving opportunities to family and friends rather than advertising them.

Advertisement

A poll of more than 1,200 recent graduates shows half have undertaken an internship, an increase of 12% since 2018, but the gap between working class and middle class graduates has widened in that time from 12% to 20%.

Speaking to the BBC, one student says she has had to turn down “potentially wonderful” opportunities as she was not able to afford working for free.

Erin Cruickshank, 20, said one of those was an unpaid internship in London last summer that she ultimately turned down.

The cost of staying in the capital – where she had no family or friends to stay with – would have left her “worse off,” she said.

Advertisement

The 20-year-old, from West Lothian, called the situation “unjust and unfair”.

Unpaid “or unfairly paid” positions are commonplace, Erin said, and many take place in “affluent areas” like London.

“I’ve had to turn down experiences – potentially wonderful ones – because I couldn’t stay in London to have them,” she added.

The proportion of working-class graduates completing an internship is now 36%, compared to 55% for their middle-class peers, the Sutton Trust said.

Advertisement

Graduates in London were significantly more likely to have undertaken an internship than those in the West Midlands, Yorkshire, Scotland and Wales, its research showed.

Around three-fifths of internships undertaken by recent graduates were unpaid or underpaid, the study indicated.

Erin, a French and social anthropology student, decided to take a paid position at a charity in Edinburgh for the summer rather than an unpaid role.

She said: “To others who search for larger internships – from their perspective, maybe that wasn’t the best choice. But for me it was… I had a great experience.”

Advertisement

Since she often funds her own accommodation at the University of St Andrews she only applies for paid positions. She is currently on a year abroad working in France.

“If that means I’m not taking experiences in what others might consider a large name or big business, I take experiences I know will still expand my skillset and help me take steps towards my future.”

In many cases, those undertaking unpaid internships were able to do so because they received money from parents, lived at home or with family or friends, or used savings, the Sutton Trust’s research found.

Chiera Mclaughlin, a fourth year law student at the University of Glasgow, said the decision for many was “balancing whether you want to get experience in the industry you want to work in, or if you have money for food”.

Advertisement

“There’s not that freedom to accept unpaid positions,” she added.

From her experience in the law industry, she said that paid internships were “rare” and “to get any early work experience in law, it’s expected that you wouldn’t get paid for it”.

The Sutton Trust’s research also found that internships were almost twice as likely to have been found through family and friends in an organisation compared to an advertisement, further contributing to the widening access gap.

“If I was trying to get experience in say corporate law or at a law firm of some sort, it seems really difficult to even get your foot in the door if you don’t maybe know someone there,” Chiera agreed.

Advertisement

“I’m the first person from my family to go to uni and I don’t really have any family connections, or anyone in my social circle, that’s in the industry.”

As part of its ‘Make Work Pay’ plan issued before the election, Labour said it wanted to ban unpaid internships, aside from those that form part of an education or training course. Details on when that might happen have not been confirmed.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Robert Jenrick’s ‘cynical’ call for Attorney General Lord Hermer ‘conflict of interest’ investigation REJECTED

Published

on

Solicitor General Lucy Rigby has confirmed Shadow Justice Secretary Robert Jenrick’s call for an investigation into Attorney General Lord Richard Hermer has been rejected.

Jenrick had penned a letter to Cabinet Secretary Sir Chris Wormald over the weekend demanding answers to the Attorney General’s work with previous clients.


In the letter, seen by GB News, the Shadow Justice Secretary, Lord Hermer’s listed clients included Sri Lankan asylum seekers in the Chagos Islands, ex-Sinn Fein leader Gerry Adams, Afghan families associated with the ongoing Afghan inquiry and parties interested in Shamima Begum’s citizenship case.

Dismissing Jenrick’s calls for a probe, Rigby told MPs: “I have outlined the rigorous process that exists in the Attorney General’s Office and has existed across administrations of all colours.

Advertisement
Attorney General Lord Richard HermerAttorney General Lord Richard HermerPA

“The House may be aware that the shadow justice secretary [Robert Jenrick] has written to the Cabinet Secretary [Sir Chris Wormald] seeking clarity… on that process and an investigation into it, the Cabinet Secretary has today confirmed by reply that the Attorney General’s Office has a rigorous system in place to ensure that a law officer would not be consulted on any matter that could give rise to a potential conflict of interest.

“He has restated that these arrangements are long standing and part of a standard practice that has applied in successive administrations.”

Rigby also accused the Tories of being “cynical” by linking the Attorney General to his previous clients, including ex-Sinn Fein leader Gerry Adams.

However, Tory MP Ben Obese-Jecty questioned if Lord Hermer’s role as Attorney General remained tenable.

LATEST DEVELOPMENTS:

Robert Jenrick

Robert Jenrick

Advertisement

PA

He said: “The current Attorney General has a track record of taking up multiple cases against the British government. Given his previous work both with regard to Gerry Adams and the families of those making claims against UK special forces, on which matters will the Attorney General recuse himself from advising ministers owing to clear conflicts of interests?

“And if he is not able to fulfil the full scope of his role owing to his prior career, is his position even tenable?”

Rigby replied: “I am afraid I couldn’t be more clear. I have already said that where the Attorney General has conflicts he will recuse himself.”

Today’s row came after the Tories secured an urgent question in the House of Commons.

Advertisement
u200bAttorney General Richard Hermer and Leader of the House of Lords Baroness Smith leave 10 Downing StreetAttorney General Richard Hermer and Leader of the House of Lords Baroness Smith leave 10 Downing StreetPA

Lord Hermer came under fire last week after it was revealed that Labour’s will repeal a law that blocked Adams from claiming compensation for his detention.

The Attorney General represented Mr Adams in a separate case where the former Sinn Fein president was being sued by the victims of three IRA bomb attacks.

However, Hermer insisted his work with Adams was unconnected to the legislation.

Rigby said: “It is a central and well understood aspect of the British legal system… that barristers are required to accept instructions if they are available and qualified to do so.”

She added: “She will also be very aware that put simply barristers are not their clients.

Advertisement

“As the Bar Council states, barristers do not choose their clients, nor do they associate themselves with their clients’ opinions or behaviour by virtue of representing them.”

Source link

Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Urgent health warning to anyone who uses hot water bottles

Published

on

Urgent health warning to anyone who uses hot water bottles

A woman has urged others to “never use” hot water bottles after her seven-year-old bottle exploded leaving her with third-degree burns.

Karen O’Brien, a 52-year-old retail worker who lives in Melton Mowbray, Leicestershire, with her husband Daniel, 64, and their two children, suffered severe burns when her hot water bottle burst on her lap in March 2024.

The injury caused her skin to blister and peel away leaving “holes in the skin” that worsened by the hour.

At Leicester Royal Infirmary Hospital, doctors removed layers of damaged skin to prevent infection. The burn left her with a large scar on her thigh and permanent skin discolouration.

Advertisement

O’Brien is now warning others to avoid hot water bottles, and if they are using them to check the age.

The burns on O'Brien's thigh

The burns on O’Brien’s thigh (Collect/PA Real Life)

Hot water bottles perish over time so experts advise to change bottles every two to three years.

If you cannot remember when you bought your bottle, it will have a flower on or near the neck – the number in the middle is the year the bottle was made.

Advertisement

The petals represent months and the dots weeks, for example if there are three dots in the first petal it was made toward the end of January of that year.

Hot water bottles should be replaced after two to three years

Hot water bottles should be replaced after two to three years (Getty/iStock)

“I’ve never known pain like it, it was horrendous,” she said.

“When I first could see the skin, I had blisters coming up straight away, and then you could see where the skin just melted away.

Advertisement

“I pulled my trousers down, and as I did that, I could see the skin coming away with my trousers.

“There were holes in the skin but every hour it was looking worse and worse and worse.

“At first I thought, ‘OK, I know I’ve done some damage here’ but it didn’t look that bad.

“After this, I found out you are supposed to replace (hot water bottles) after around a year, and a lot of them have the date they were manufactured on them… mine might have burst because it was so old.”

Advertisement
O'Brien now has a large scar

O’Brien now has a large scar (Collect/PA Real Life)

O’Brien now has a “big scar” and skin discolouration on the area and if she is cold, the area often goes “bright red”.

She said she is now “so wary” of dealing with anything hot, whether it be making herself a hot drink or cooking.

To people who use hot water bottles, she said: “Never, ever use them, especially don’t give them to children, they are too dangerous.

Advertisement

“My husband’s bought me a battery-powered fleece that keeps me warm so I don’t need to use a hot water bottle.”

Source link

Continue Reading

NewsBeat

ChatGPT down as thousands report issues worldwide

Published

on

ChatGPT down as thousands report issues worldwide

Thousands of people have reported they are unable to use the world’s best-known artificial intelligence (AI) tool, ChatGPT

Downdetector, which tracks website outages, showed more than 10,000 people reported the AI chatbot, which is made by OpenAI, was not working in the UK on Thursday.

Users attempting to use it were met with a message reading “the web server reported a bad gateway error”.

OpenAI has not yet publicly commented on the outage. The BBC has contacted the firm for comment.

Advertisement

However, many people have taken to social media to highlight the problem and the disruption it is causing them.

The outage began around 11:00 GMT on Thursday, and users continue to report issues.

ChatGPT’s status page said the app had been “experiencing elevated error rates” and the firm was “currently investigating”.

Though many people use the free version of the chatbot, the firm charges up to $200 per month for its various membership tiers.

Advertisement

OpenAI boss Sam Altman said in December that ChatGPT is used weekly by more than 300 million people worldwide.

It comes after tech firms including OpenAI pledged a $500bn (£405bn) investment into AI infrastructure in the US.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Reform UK: Chairman Zia Yusuf REJECTS Suella Braverman’s offer of a Tory-Reform pact: ‘Betrayed British people!’

Published

on

Reform UK chairman Zia Yusuf has expressed disappointment at Suella Braverman’s suggestion for an electoral pact between the populist party and the Conservatives.

Speaking on GB News, Yusuf firmly rejected any possibility of a deal with the Tories, questioning how Reform could work with a group that “deal entirely in deception, in falsehoods, and betrayal”.


Yusuf’s comments came after the former Home Secretary called for unity on the right during a visit to Washington DC for Donald Trump’s inauguration.

Speaking on GB News, Yusuf said: “I agree with her that there isn’t space for two, and the reality is Reform has already overtaken the Conservative Party.

Advertisement
Zia Yousef

Zia Yousef said that Reform will never have a pact with the Tories

GB News

“Look, how can you do a deal? How can you do a pact with a group, with a tribe who deal entirely in deception, in falsehoods, and betrayal?

Advertisement

“They have betrayed the people of Britain to such an extraordinary degree that they will fully deserve the extinction event that’s now facing them.

LATEST DEVELOPMENTS

“The pollsters have a great deal of discretion to flex things up and down and none of the pollsters want to go first, because pollsters largely have no interest in being correct. They just want to not be demonstrably wrong. You’ll see in the coming weeks, Reform surging ahead of the Tory party, as we already have done in several polls.

“But look, just look at the Tories’ track record here. Over the 14 years that they were in government, they grew the size of the population of the United Kingdom by six and a half million people.

Advertisement
Suella Braverman

Suella Braverman suggested a pact between the parties

PA

“They built no new net prison places, which is why we have violent criminals running rampant around the United Kingdom and people feel terrified to leave their homes, particularly women. The 2010, the 2015, the 2017, and the 2019 manifesto, they promised to bring that migration down to the tens of thousands. What did they do? They left office with that number at one million.”

He added: “We will never do a deal with the Tory party, because they will never again get a chance to betray the British.”

Advertisement

Braverman made her comments while attending Trump’s inauguration in Washington DC, where she praised the former President’s style of “unfiltered conservatism”.”

“Donald Trump has not just shifted Overton window, he’s shattered it,” Braverman told The Telegraph.

Zia Yousef

Zia Yousef said the Tories have “betrayed the British people”

Advertisement

GB News

“He’s made the unsayable mainstream and he’s made the radical much more acceptable to the moderates.”

Braverman added she was open to various forms of cooperation, including “a merger, a coalition, a supply and confidence agreement, or a non-aggression pact”.

The former Home Secretary also aligned herself with Reform UK’s position on leaving the European Convention on Human Rights.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Prince Harry’s legal battles: Who is the duke still taking against and which cases are settled?

Published

on

Prince Harry’s legal battles: Who is the duke still taking against and which cases are settled?

The Duke of Sussex settled his legal action against the publishers of The Sun newspaper on Wednesday, receiving a rumoured eight-figure settlement and a “full and unequivocal apology” for intrusion into his private life.

It has been described as a “monumental victory” for Prince Harry against the British press and came after he secured a separate victory against the publishers behind The Mirror in 2023.

But his legal battles are not yet over, as he is still engaged in two other high-profile cases in the British courts against the Home Office and publishers of the Daily Mail.

Here is an explanation of all of Harry’s past and present legal battles:

Advertisement
Prince Harry leaves the High Court after giving evidence in London in June 2023

Prince Harry leaves the High Court after giving evidence in London in June 2023 (Getty)

What cases are over?

Mirror Group Newspapers (MGN)

In 2023, the High Court ruled in Harry’s favour in his case against the publishers of The Daily Mirror.

Advertisement

A 386-page judgment found that “extensive” phone hacking had taken place at Mirror Group Newspapers (MGN) titles over several years. This included phone hacking, “blagging” (gaining information by deception), and the use of private investigators for unlawful activities.

The court ruled that the practice was “widespread and habitual” at the Daily Mirror.

The case against MGN was heard over a seven-week trial and included testimony from Harry, alongside other representative claimants.

The court ruled that phone hacking was “widespread and habitual” at the Daily Mirror.

Advertisement
The court ruled that phone hacking was “widespread and habitual” at the Daily Mirror. (REUTERS)

News Group Newspapers (NGN)

On Wednesday, a line was drawn under Harry’s five year legal battle against the publishers of The Sun newspaper, News Group Newspapers (NGN).

The duke settled with the publishers after eleventh-hour discussions on the day his high-stakes trial was set to begin on Tuesday.

Though he did not technically win the case in a court of law, it marked a “monumental victory” for the duke as he received an apology for many of the claims he made against the publisher a “substantial” sum for damages.

Advertisement

NGN, a subsidiary of News UK owned by Rupert Murdoch’s News Corp, said it offered a “full and unequivocal apology to the Duke of Sussex” for “serious intrusion” by The Sun and for phone hacking by private investigators working for the News of the World.

NGN, a subsidiary of News UK owned by Rupert Murdoch’s News Corp, said it offered a “full and unequivocal apology to the Duke of Sussex”.

NGN, a subsidiary of News UK owned by Rupert Murdoch’s News Corp, said it offered a “full and unequivocal apology to the Duke of Sussex”. (PA Archive)

What cases are ongoing?

Associated Newspapers Limited (ANL)

Advertisement

Harry’s case against the publishers of the Daily Mail for unlawful information gathering could go to trial in early 2026.

The Duke of Sussex has accused the publisher of allegedly commissioning unlawful activities, including hiring private investigators to place listening devices inside cars, recording private phone conversations “blagging” private records, and even burglaries to order.

He is among a group of high-profile individuals fighting the case, including Stephen Lawrence’s mother, Baroness Doreen Lawrence, Sir Elton John and his husband David Furnish, actresses Sadie Frost and Liz Hurley, and politician Sir Simon Hughes.

The group is bringing legal action against Associated Newspapers Limited (ANL), which firmly denies the allegations, previously telling the court that they are “lurid” and “simply preposterous.

Advertisement
Harry’s case against the publishers of the Daily Mail for unlawful information gathering could go to trial in early 2026.

Harry’s case against the publishers of the Daily Mail for unlawful information gathering could go to trial in early 2026. (AFP via Getty Images)

The Home Office

Harry took legal action against the Home Office over the February 2020 decision to change the level of his personal security when he visits the UK.

In a judgment last February, retired High Court judge Sir Peter Lane rejected the duke’s case and concluded Ravec’s approach was not irrational nor procedurally unfair.

Advertisement

However, the Court of Appeal said in June last year that it will hear his challenge following a direct application from Harry’s lawyers, who said Harry had been granted permission to appeal.

However, the Court of Appeal has now said it will hear his challenge following a direct application from Harry’s lawyers, who said Harry had been granted permission to appeal.

The appeal is now expected to be heard in the spring.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Common Sense with Robert Jenrick

Published

on

Robert Jenrick has highlighted a severe crisis in England’s court system in his latest episode of Common Sense.

He explained that nearly half of all courtrooms at London’s Central Criminal Court are currently empty in a shocking revelation.

Speaking outside the Old Bailey, Jenrick pointed to 11 vacant courtrooms in the building, describing it as “the beating heart of our legal system”.

The situation is even more dire in Carlisle, where 67 per cent of courtrooms stand empty, while Bristol sees 40 per cent of its courtrooms unused on average each week.

Advertisement

The court system is facing a mounting crisis with a backlog of 73,000 cases, which is increasing by 500 cases every month.

In episode two, Jenrick speaks to James from the Criminal Bar Association, and highlights “the right to a fair trial in a reasonable time frame”.

Watch the second episode of ‘Common Sense with Robert Jenrick’ above

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Could you pass a Cambridge English exam from 1913?

Published

on

Could you pass a Cambridge English exam from 1913?
Janine Machin

BBC News correspondent, East of England

BBC A book is displayed on a protective cushion. It is open, showing some of the questions from the first Cambridge English exam in 1913.BBC

Three people sat the first Cambridge English exam in 1913, now it is taken by more than a million people a year

Do you remember the feeling of sitting an exam? The halls crammed with desks and the sound of the ticking clock. Cambridge University Press and Assessment (CUP&A), one of the UK’s biggest exam providers, has been setting papers since the 1850s and its English exams have now been taken by more than 100 million people around the world. But today’s exam is very different to that very first paper.

Director of Research at Cambridge University Press and Assessment, Evelina Galaczi, stands in front of a bookcase. She is smiling and wearing a blue shirt and glasses.

Dr Evelina Galaczi, director of research at CUP&A, says learning English “opens doors”

In 1913, three people sat down to take the first Cambridge English exam. They were all teachers and all of them failed. But would you? This is one of the questions – you can find the answers at the end.

Advertisement

Correct or justify four of the following sentences, giving your reasons:

(a) I hope you are determined to seriously improve.

(b) Comparing Shakespeare with Aeschylus, the former is by no means inferior to the latter.

(c) I admit that I was willing to have made peace with you.

Advertisement

(d) The statement was incorrect, as any one familiar with the spot, and who was acquainted with the facts, will admit.

(e) It has the largest circulation of any paper in England.

(f) The lyrical gifts of Shakespeare are woven into the actual language of the characters.

The exam comprised a series of papers on phonetics, grammar, and translation, which took 12 hours to complete.

Advertisement

“At first, it was an exam for a small elite who wanted to study English as an academic subject, like Latin or Ancient Greek,” says Dr Evelina Galaczi, director of research at CUP&A.

“At the time, grammar and translation were considered the most important thing, but now the exam is much more about using English to communicate.

“The shift was gradual, but in the Second World War English became a global language and so speaking and pronunciation became much more important.

“That was a catalyst for change, and I firmly believe that learning English opens doors.”

Advertisement
A printed page from the 1913 English exam. It gives two hours for candidates to write an essay on a variety of subjects from Elizabethan travel and discovery to The Indian Mutiny

A question from the 1913 English exam which CUP&A says is a reflection of the time

By the 1950s, there had been requests for the English exam to offer translation questions in dozens of different languages, ranging from Arabic to Vietnamese.

Gillian Cooke, group archivist at CUP&A, said: ” I think the take up for each language was quite small and so that probably wasn’t cost effective.

“It might be one of the reasons why the translation paper was dropped in the 1970s.”

Gillian Cooke stands behind an large abacus, about 80cm wide. It has many rows of different coloured beads which were used by examiners to set the grade standards.

Cambridge University Press and Assessment archivist, Gillian Cooke, with an abacus which examiners used to determine students’ grades until the 1970s

The Cambridge English exam has continued to evolve.

Advertisement

There are now different versions tailored to the needs of schools, higher education, and businesses.

“More than 100 million people across 130 countries have now sat our English exams,” says marketing director for higher education, Ian Cook.

“They’re recognised by more than 25,000 organisations from governments – which use them for immigration purposes – to employers and universities.

“Some universities in Germany, Sweden, and East Asia, for example, deliver IT and healthcare courses in English in order to attract the best candidates and so students need to show they have the language skills to cope with the course.”

Advertisement
Marketing Director Ian Cook. He is standing in the large open reception area of the Cambridge University Press and Assessment building, wearing a suit.

Marketing director Ian Cook says the exams are trusted by governments, employers and universities across 130 countries

Today, the exams are also available digitally and artificial intelligence (AI) is being used to create adaptive tests.

“In simple terms, the next question you’re served up depends on how well you answered the previous one,” says Mr Cook.

“And by offering a range of slightly more difficult and then easier questions as you go through, the technology will help to find your level.

“Our expertise and research have proven that the more teaching and tests are personalised, the better for students.

Advertisement

“We want people to have confidence, to pass – and show what they’re capable of.”

Despite the changes, CUP&A insists that its approach is as much about continuity as innovation.

Dr Galaczi adds: “Examiners and AI work together in marking and setting content for the exams, so we harness the strengths of both the human being and the machine.”

How did you do?

Advertisement

CUP&A says opinions about correct English grammar have changed, but in 1913, these would have been the expected answers:

(a) This is a split infinitive which would have been considered wrong. It should have said “to improve seriously”

(b) This is a hanging participle. It should have read “Shakespeare is by no means inferior to Aeschylus”. Now we would say “Shakespeare is just as good as”.

(c) Wrong tense. It should be “to make peace”.

Advertisement

(d) “Would admit” not “Will admit”.

(e) Correct

(f) Correct

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Corpse flower: Plant with ‘deadly’ stench pulls huge crowds for rare bloom in Sydney | Offbeat News

Published

on

A view of a blossoming Bunga Bangkai, nicknamed the 'corpse flower' for its stench, at the Botanic Gardens of Sydney in Sydney, Australia, January 23, 2025. REUTERS/Cordelia Hsu

People have queued for hours at a Sydney greenhouse to get a whiff of the infamous corpse flower, as it bloomed for the first time in years.

The sizeable flower, officially called the amorphophallus titanium, gets its nickname from its “deadly” stench, described by some as the smell of rotting flesh, though others detect hints of rotting food, sweaty socks or even garlic.

The rare specimen, of which there are only thought to be about 1,000 worldwide, has attracted thousands of admirers at the Royal Sydney Botanic Garden, with its blooming finally happening after a seven-year wait since it arrived at the centre.

When its flower was spotted in December it was just 25cm (10 inches) high. By Thursday, as its flower spike slowly opened, it was 1.6m (5ft 3) tall.

Advertisement

For a week, the flower fronted a stately and gothic display in front of a purple curtain and wreathed in mist from a humidifier at the garden, attracting up to 20,000 admirers who filed past, hoping to experience the smell for themselves.

People line up to view the blossoming Bunga Bangkai, nicknamed the 'corpse flower' for its stench, in Sydney, Australia.
Pic: Reuters
Image:
People line up to view the smell plant. Pic: Reuters

People take photos of the blossoming Bunga Bangkai, nicknamed the 'corpse flower' for its stench, in Sydney, Australia.
Pic: Reuters
Image:
Pic: Reuters

This particular flower has been nicknamed Putricia by fans – a combination of “putrid” and “Patricia”, and has become something of a social media star, with a 24/7 live stream established by the botanic garden drawing close to a million views in the days approaching its bloom.

When it finally opened on Thursday, fans in attendance took selfies and leaned in for a sniff – and staff prepared for the worst.

“We did have a few conversations early on about whether or not we should have vomit bags in the room,” said garden spokesperson Sophie Daniel, who designed Putricia’s display, adding garden staff ultimately decided against it.

Read more:
Elephants can’t pursue release because they are not people
Cat left on plane ends up taking three flights

Advertisement
A person takes a photo of the blossoming Bunga Bangkai, nicknamed the 'corpse flower' for its stench, in Sydney, Australia.
Pic: Reuters
Image:
Pic: Reuters

“I haven’t heard of anyone actually being harmed.”

The corpse flower only blooms for one to three days despite taking up to a decade to do so.

“The fact that they open very rarely, so they flower rarely, is obviously something that puts them at a little bit of a disadvantage in the wild,” Ms Daniel said.

“When they open, they have to hope that another flower is open nearby, because they can’t self-pollinate.”

The amorphophallus titanum is native to the Indonesian island of Sumatra and is listed as endangered by the International Union for Conservation of Nature.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Sky News reporter cries live on air reading Southport killing evidence | News

Published

on

Sky News reporter breaks down in tears reading out Southport killings evidence

Warning: This video contains distressing content.

Sky News reporter Sarah-Jane Mee broke down in tears reading out evidence from court in the sentencing of Southport killer Axel Rudakubana.

Rudakubana, 18, stabbed and killed Alice da Silva Aguiar, Bebe King and Elsie Dot Stancombe., with a 20cm-long kitchen knife as he ambushed a Taylor Swift-themed dance class in Southport, Merseyside.

Reporting live from outside Liverpool Crown Court on Thursday (23 January), the broadcaster became visibly emotional as she recounted evidence from police arriving at the scene.

Advertisement

The broadcaster then had to step-off camera as her voice broke.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025 WordupNews