Connect with us

NewsBeat

Court finds neo-Nazi Cavan Medlock planned attack at law firm

Published

on

Court finds neo-Nazi Cavan Medlock planned attack at law firm
BBC Cavan Medlock armed with a knife launches himself at a member of staff in the reception area of a law firm. There are doors in the background and two blue chairsBBC

Cavan Medlock launched himself at a member of staff after being refused entry to meet a solicitor

A Nazi sympathiser has been found by a court to have prepared a terrorism attack on an immigration law firm after choosing them as a target after reading a Daily Mail article.

Cavan Medlock carried a Nazi flag and a knife into a London solicitors’ offices in 2020 and then launched an attack on staff.

The attack caused so much alarm that senior lawyers lobbied the then home secretary, Dame Priti Patel, to reconsider some of the language she and others were using, claiming that it was adding to tensions.

Leaders in the profession say the incident has led to continuing concern as extreme right-wing groups single out lawyers for abuse and threats.

Advertisement
Cavan Medlock in a selfie

Cavan Medlock said he chose target after reading about solicitor in the Daily Mail

During his police interview, Medlock said he had chosen the firm and its immigration chief as targets after they had been named in a Daily Mail article three days earlier.

The finding at Kingston Crown Court on Tuesday was not a criminal conviction – but a conclusion by a jury of factually what happened.

A trial of the facts occurs in rare circumstances when a defendant is not well enough to either admit or deny a charge, but a case needs to be concluded.

An attempt to put Medlock on trial in March was aborted after he suffered an episode of very serious mental ill health.

Advertisement

The jury found he had committed the acts of preparing for an act of terrorism and making threats to kill when he stormed into the offices of law firm Duncan Lewis.

A senior judge will decide on Thursday how best to manage Medlock’s detention for public protection because he is too mentally unwell to be in a prison.

Cavan Medlock surrounded by staff at the Duncan Lewis firm

Staff subdued and disarmed Medlock and then surrounded him until the police arrived

That incident happened on 7 September 2020 when the then 27-year-old Medlock walked into the firm, which has a specialist immigration law team who handle some of the most complex cases in the country.

Medlock repeatedly asked to see the firm’s head of immigration law – but after about 15 minutes of waiting, he pulled out a six-inch knife and lunged at a receptionist.

Advertisement

The member of staff succeeded in disarming Medlock, who was ultimately overwhelmed and subdued by other staff who rushed to the scene.

Medlock then declared that he had come to kill the senior lawyer he had been asking for and used racially offensive language against other members of staff.

When one of them identified herself as Jewish, Medlock expressed support for Hitler and the Holocaust.

Police later found a Swastika flag in his bag – and his interview confirmed an ideological motive that fitted the legal definition of terrorism.

Advertisement

At the time Medlock was not diagnosed with any mental ill health condition and he was assessed by a nurse as fit to speak to officers.

The Nazi Swastika flag carried by Cavan Medlock to the attack

Medlock planned to fly this flag in the law firm’s front window

‘Rallying cry’ for other followers

In his police interview, he told detectives that he had wanted to stop the firm helping immigrants by taking its immigration chief captive.

He then planned to put the Nazi flag, and another relating to the US’s slave era states, in the firm’s window as a “rallying cry to other nationalists”.

Advertisement

“When politics fails and the people have no alternative, I think violence is the only natural progression of that thinking to get change,” he told officers, warning that there was a “white genocide” under way.

“Boris Johnson, he’s not going to do anything about mass immigration,” he said.

“How many times have the Conservatives promised to bring the immigration [level] to 100,000 a year, and failed?”

Metropolitan Police The black hunting knife carried by Cavan Medlock during his attack on the law firmMetropolitan Police

Medlock told police in his interview that he was carrying this to intimidate

Timothy Cray KC, prosecuting, told Kingston Crown Court: “He was admitting carrying out acts of preparation for terrorism. His brand of terrorism was clear.

Advertisement

“By his own admission, at the time of the attacks, he identified as a Nazi. We say that plan was designed to intimidate a section of the public.

“Can you imagine the [media] coverage? A solicitor held hostage, or perhaps worse, and the Nazi flag flying in London.

“Perhaps we can console ourselves with the fact that he would not have had many takers.”

Target chosen from Mail article

Advertisement

During his police interview, Medlock said he had chosen the firm and its immigration chief as targets after they had been named in a Daily Mail article three days earlier.

“I first saw his name on [The] Daily Mail, a couple of days ago,” said Medlock.

“And then when I Googled his name and I found out he has his office right here… I was like, you know, these people, they can’t just continue to flood Europe with people nobody wants here and get away with it.”

Medlock’s phone history confirmed he had read the article which referred to “UK lawyers who coach asylum seekers” to avoid deportation.

Advertisement

That article came after sources in Boris Johnson’s government had been briefing some journalists for weeks that “activist lawyers” had been holding up some deportations, the court heard.

The phrase was used publicly a week before the attack in a video posted on the Home Office’s account on Twitter, now known as X.

The department’s top civil servant then banned it from the government’s PR releases.

But Dame Priti Patel, then home secretary, used the phrase in her own tweet the day before the Mail’s article – but she did not publicly mention Duncan Lewis or any other firm.

Advertisement
Twitter A screenshot of a Priti Patel tweet referring to "activist lawyers"Twitter

‘Activist lawyers’: Profession complained the language was inflammatory

Fears among lawyers after attack

The Bar Council, the professional body for barristers in England and Wales, condemned the language and at the time called on her and Boris Johnson to “stop deliberately inflammatory language towards a profession simply doing its job”.

Mr Johnson had made separate comments deriding human rights lawyers in his October 2020 party conference speech, but did not refer to Duncan Lewis or immigration cases.

Sam Townend KC, the council’s current president, said that it had continued to warn of anti-lawyer rhetoric and it hoped a page had now been turned – but the profession’s concerns remain exceptionally high.

Advertisement

Richard Atkinson, the president of the Law Society, which represents solicitors, said: “The attack on Duncan Lewis solicitors was the first example of a worrying new trend.

“This eventually led to threatened attacks on 39 law firms and advice agencies during this summer’s riots.

“Many lawyers have faced deaths threats and have had to seek police protection. Until recently, this was unheard of in our country.

“This trend did not emerge from nowhere. It was closely associated with a degraded debate led by senior parliamentarians and sections of the media, largely focused on the immigration and asylum system.

Advertisement

“Words have consequences, particularly when they come from people in positions of seniority and power. They can legitimise hate, encourage division, and have serious repercussions.”

Dame Priti Patel has been contacted for comment.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

NewsBeat

Keely Hodgkinson: Olympic 800m gold medallist voted 2024 Sunday Times Sportswoman of the Year

Published

on

Keely Hodgkinson: Olympic 800m gold medallist voted 2024 Sunday Times Sportswoman of the Year

Olympic 800m gold medallist Keely Hodgkinson has been voted the 2024 Sunday Times Sportswoman of the Year.

The 22-year-old ended her wait for a global title with victory at the Olympic Games in Paris last summer and won BBC Sports Personality of the Year in December 2024.

Hodgkinson also retained her European 800m title and became the sixth-fastest woman of all time when she improved her British record to one minute 54.61 seconds at the London Diamond League.

Hodgkinson follows last year’s winner, England goalkeeper Mary Earps, athlete Eilish McColgan, and tennis player Emma Raducanu, who won in 2021.

Advertisement

The shortlist for the 2024 award was dominated by Olympic medal winners with Hodgkinson scooping it ahead of 1500m runner Georgia Bell, showjumper Laura Collett, cyclist Emma Finucane, heptathlete Katarina Johnson-Thompson, trampoline gymnast Bryony Page, shooter Amber Rutter and Paralympic cycling great Sarah Storey.

Elsewhere, diver Andrea Spendolini-Sirieix was named the newspaper’s Young Sportswoman of the Year after she won bronze in Paris.

Storey picked up the Disability Sportswoman of the Year after she added two more golds to her medal collection at the Paralympic Games.

Rowers Lauren Henry, Lola Anderson, Georgina Brayshaw and Hannah Scott won the Team of the Year for their dramatic victory in the women’s quadruple sculls at Paris 2024.

Advertisement

Ultra runner Jasmin Paris won the Helen Rollason Award for Inspiration, while retired PE teacher and cycling enthusiast Val French won the Grassroots Sportswoman of the Year.

BBC radio presenter Eleanor Oldroyd’s contribution to sports broadcasting was also recognised with a special Editor’s Choice Award.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Donald Trump ‘personally asked Boris Johnson’ to witness his swearing in while Nigel Farage ‘did not make the cut’

Published

on

Donald Trump personally asked Boris Johnson to witness his swearing in as President, and has a “good working relationship” with him, says former Tory Security minister Tom Tugendhat.

Tugendhat, who was in Washington DC last week ahead of the President’s inauguration, said Trump has personally asked Johnson to be in the rotunda on Capitol Hill to witness personally his swearing in.


Earlier this week Nigel Farage, the leader of Reform UK, told GB News that he had not “made the cut” and been invited to sit in the Rotunda audience.

Tugendhat told today’s Chopper’s Political Podcast that he had been told by “members of the administration” that it was “a personal decision by the President” to invite Johnson to be there.

Advertisement

Donald Trump personally asked Boris Johnson to witness his swearing in as President, and has a “good working relationship” with him, says former Tory Security minister Tom Tugendhat

Getty

He said: “It is very clear to me that that was a personal choice by the president choosing people who he was close to, to be around him on the day.”

Advertisement

He added: “It wasn’t a large list. There’s not that many people can fit in there. And the President went through the list personally and removed some names and added [others].”

Tugendhat added that Johnson – who has in the past intimated he wants a way back into politics – “has had a very good working relationship with Donald Trump.

Tom Tugendhat, who was in Washington DC last week ahead of the President’s inauguration, said Trump has personally asked Johnson to be in the rotunda on Capitol Hill to witness personally his swearing in

Advertisement

GB News

“He’s got a lot of friends in Washington.

“He’s got a voice that reaches parts that other politicians don’t reach.”

Listen or watch Chopper’s Political Podcast on Apple Podcasts, Spotify or GB News’ YouTube channel.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Moment ten-pint drink-driver confronted after leaving victim amputee | News

Published

on

Moment ten-pint drink-driver confronted after leaving victim amputee

Bodycam footage shows police confronting a drink driver after he seriously injured two people in a collision near Bristol Airport, leaving one victim needing her arm amputated at the elbow.

Another victim suffered significant internal bleeding and bruising.

Leigh Brean, 43, of Lawrence Road, Wrington, was jailed for three years and two months and was told he was not allowed to drive for 11 years and seven months.

In five hours, he had drunk 10 pints before getting behind the wheel of the car.

Advertisement

He pleaded guilty to causing serious injury by dangerous driving and for failing to provide a specimen.

Source link

Continue Reading

NewsBeat

‘My daughter’s bones were scattered on the ground’

Published

on

'My daughter's bones were scattered on the ground'
Fergal Keane

Special correspondent

BBC Lina al-Dabah shows photo of her dead daughter Aya on a mobile phoneBBC

Lina al-Dabah shows a picture of her daughter Aya

Everything gets mixed up together. The child’s multi-coloured backpack. A running shoe. A steel pot perforated by shrapnel. Bits of beds, chairs, cookers, lampshades; the glass of broken windows, mirrors, drinking glasses. Scraps of clothing.

These last shredded, dust covered items can be markers. Often they belong to the dead lying near the surface of the rubble.

Advertisement

“Since the Israeli occupation forces withdrew from Rafah, we have had about 150 calls from civilians about the presence of their relatives’ bodies under houses,” says Haitham al-Homs, director of Emergency and Ambulance Services for the Civil Defence agency in Rafah, at the southernmost end of the Gaza Strip.

The Palestinian health authorities estimate that 10,000 people are missing. Where there is no obvious marker like clothing at the surface, the search teams rely on information from relatives and neighbours, or they follow the smell of death that radiates from the ruins.

WARNING: This story contains distressing content

Haitham al-Homs, a man wearing an orange high-vis item and in protective forensic gear, stands in front of an ambulance in Rafah

Haitham al-Homs, director of Emergency and Ambulances services in Rafah

The Israeli government has banned the BBC and other international news organisations from entering Gaza and reporting independently. We depend on trusted local journalists to record the experiences of people like those who are searching for the missing.

Advertisement

At the end of every day, Mr Homs updates the list of those found. His team excavates the rubble with care, aware that they are searching for fragments of broken humanity. Often what is recovered is no more than a pile of bones. Israel’s high explosive bombs blasted and mangled into pieces many of the dead. The bones and scraps of clothing are placed in white body bags upon which Mr Homs writes the Arabic word “majhoul”. It means “unidentified”.

A gloved hand holds what appears to be teeth and parts of a jaw found in the rubble in Rafah

Human remains among the rubble in Rafah

A resident of Rafah, Osama Saleh, went back to his home after the ceasefire and found a skeleton inside. The skull was fractured. Mr Saleh reckons the body lay there for four to five months. “We are humans with feeling…I can’t convey to you how miserable the tragedy is,” he says.

To be surrounded every day by the smell of decomposing bodies is a deeply unsettling experience, as those who have witnessed the aftermath of mass death will often testify.

Osama Saleh, who lives in Rafah, looks shocked into the camera

Osama Saleh found a skeleton in his home on his return

“The bodies are terrifying. We are seeing terror,” Osama Saleh says. “I swear it is a painful feeling, I have cried.”

Advertisement

Families have also been arriving at hospitals to search for remains. In the courtyard of the European Hospital in southern Gaza, collections of bones and clothing are spread out on body bags.

Abdul Salam al-Mughayer, 19, from Rafah, went missing in the Shaboura area; according to his uncle, Zaki, it was a place you didn’t come back from if you went there during the war. “So, we didn’t go to look for him there for that reason. We wouldn’t have returned.”

Zaki believes a set of bones and clothes in front of him belong to the missing Abdul Salam. He is standing with a hospital worker, Jihad Abu Khreis, waiting for Abdul Salam’s brother to arrive.

“It’s 99% certain the body is his,” Mr Abu Khreis says, “but now we need the final confirmation from his brother, the closest people to him, to make sure that the trousers and shoes are his.”

Advertisement
Young men crouch over clothes in a white body bag

The brother of the missing teenager Abdul Salam examines the clothes found with the bones

Soon after the brother arrived from the tented refugee camp of al-Mawasi, also in southern Gaza. He had a photograph of Abdul Salam on his phone. There was a photo of his running shoes.

He knelt before the body bag and pulled back the cover. He touched the skull, the clothes. He saw the shoes. There were tears in his eyes. The identification was complete.

Another family moved along the row of body bags. There was a grandmother, her son, an adult sister, and a toddler. The child was kept at the back of the group while the elderly woman and her son looked under the cover of the body bag. They stared for a few seconds and then embraced each other in grief.

After this, the family, helped by hospital workers, carried away the remains. They were weeping, but nobody cried aloud.

Advertisement
Handout A teenage girl smiles in a photograph, holding her fingers up in a V-signHandout

Aya al-Dabeh, 13, was killed when she was staying in a school

Aya al-Dabeh was 13 years old and was living with her family and hundreds of other refugees at a school in Tal al-Hawa, in Gaza City in the north. She was one of nine children.

One day at the start of the war Aya went to go to the bathroom upstairs at the school and – her family says – she was shot in the chest by an Israeli sniper. The Israel Defense Forces say they do not target civilians and blame Hamas for attacking from civilian areas. During the war the UN Human Rights Office said that that there has been “intense shooting by Israeli forces in densely populated areas resulting in apparently unlawful killings, including of unarmed bystanders.”

The family buried Aya beside the school, and her mother Lina al- Dabah, 43, wrapped her in a blanket “to protect her from the rain and the sun” in case the grave was disturbed and exposed to the elements.

When the Israeli military took over the school Lina fled south. She went with four other children – two daughters and two sons – to reunite with her husband who’d gone earlier with the couple’s other children. Lina had no option but to leave her daughter where she lay, hoping to come back and recover the remains for a proper burial once peace came.

Advertisement

“Aya was a very kind girl, and everyone loved her. She used to love everyone, her teachers and her studies, and she was very good at school. She wished well for everyone,” Lina says. When the ceasefire came Lina asked relatives still living in the north to check up on Aya’s grave. The news was devastating.

Family members in a tent show pictures of Aya on a mobile phone

Surviving family members look at photos of Aya

“They informed us that her head was in one place, her legs were in another, while her ribs were somewhere else. The one who went to visit her was shocked and sent us the pictures,” she says.

“When I saw her, I couldn’t understand how my daughter was taken out of her grave, and how did the dogs eat her? I can’t control my nerves.”

The relatives have collected the bones and soon Lina and her family will travel north to carry Aya’s remains to a proper grave. For Lina, there is grief with no end, and a question that has no answer – the same question that sits with so many parents who lost children in Gaza. What could they have done differently, the circumstances of the war being what they were?

Advertisement

“I couldn’t take her from where she was buried,” says Lina. Then she asks: “Where could I have taken her?”

With additional reporting by Malak Hassouneh, Alice Doyard, Adam Campbell.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Cold weather payment: Over 1m households set for £25 – postcode checker and eligibility

Published

on

Cold weather payment: Over 1m households set for £25 – postcode checker and eligibility

More than a million cold weather payments have been triggered after the January cold snap, with some households set to receive up to £50 to go towards the cost of heating their home.

To help support people during freezing weather, the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) runs the cold weather payment scheme for qualifying households. This is a one-off payment of £25 that is triggered for every seven-day period where the temperature in your area is at or below zero degrees.

In the week ending 17 January, there were 1.2 million of these payments triggered, a dramatic increase from 161,000 the week before. This means millions of households are set to get a £25 payment soon – with some will get even more as they felt the freezing weather for over two weeks.

Cold weather payments have been triggered for 793 postcode areas so far this year, most for the first time in January. These areas span across England and Wales, with most regions affected. Only the East of England, South West and London didn’t see the freezing weather last long enough to trigger any payments, for the most part.

Advertisement

Here is a map of all the latest areas to qualify:

Am I eligible for a cold weather payment?

You are eligible for the payment if you receive any of the following:

Advertisement
  • Pension Credit
  • Income Support
  • Income-based Jobseeker’s Allowance (JSA)
  • Income-related Employment and Support Allowance (ESA)
  • Universal Credit
  • Support for Mortgage Interest

You must also live in an area that has experienced seven days of zero or sub-zero temperatures.

The DWP uses its own equipment to measure temperatures across all UK postcodes. If you disagree with the judgement, it is possible to appeal directly to the department.

You do not qualify for this scheme if you live in Scotland, as the Scottish government has recently replaced the scheme with Winter Heating Payments.

When will I get the payment?

If you’re eligible, you will get these payments automatically. They should arrive in the same bank account you receive benefit payments, within 14 working days of the cold period.

Advertisement

If you believe you are eligible but have not received the payments, you should contact the DWP.

Full list of postcodes eligible for cold weather payment

Here are all the postcode areas where cold weather payments have been triggered since November:

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Rupert Lowe skewers human rights lawyer over outrageous illegal immigrant demand: ‘Pork barrelling a living!’

Published

on

Reform UK MP Rupert Lowe has strongly rejected calls for an amnesty for illegal migrants in Britain, following suggestions by human rights lawyer Ivon Sampson.

Speaking on GB News, Sampson argued that offering an amnesty would enable better tracking of migrants, stating: “The only sensible thing to do is to offer an amnesty – then we have a sensible policy of ensuring those people who come in are tracked.”


Lowe hit back, saying: “These human rights lawyers pork barrel a living on the back of all this Tony Blair legislation which has created our problem.”

He called for tougher measures, suggesting migrants should be placed in “uncomfortable, untented camps” on remote islands.

Advertisement
Ivon Sampson and Rupert Lowe

Rupert Lowe said human rights lawyers like Sampson are ‘pork barrelling a living’

GB NEWS

The clash comes as new figures reveal up to one in 12 people living in London are illegal migrants.

Advertisement

A previously confidential report commissioned by Thames Water estimates between 390,355 and 585,533 illegal migrants are living in the capital, with a median figure of 487,944.

LATEST DEVELOPMENTS

u200bReform's Rupert Lowe joined Matt Goodwin on GB News

Reform’s Rupert Lowe joined Matt Goodwin on GB News

Advertisement

GB NEWS

The study, conducted by Edge Analytics and Leeds University experts, suggests most illegal migrants initially arrived on work, study or visitor visas before overstaying.

The research indicates around one million illegal migrants could be living in the UK, with 60 per cent concentrated in London.

The findings were obtained through Freedom of Information requests to Thames Water, who commissioned the study to better understand their “hidden” service users.

Advertisement

Reform UK chairman Zia Yusuf warned the situation represents “not just a national emergency, it’s a national security emergency.”

Matt Goodwin and Ivon Sampson

The human rights lawyer argued in favour of giving all illegal migrants amnesty

GB NEWS

Advertisement

He expressed particular concern about demographics, noting: “90 per cent of the people crossing the Channel are men.”

“The number of military age males making that journey legally surpasses the number of available soldiers, both standing and territorial,” Yusuf told GB News.

Deputy Reform UK leader Richard Tice added: “One in 12 people in London are here illegally, probably working illegally using taxpayer-funded public infrastructure and services. It is totally unacceptable.”

The Home Office reports having removed 16,400 illegal migrants in the past six months, the highest figure in half a decade.

Advertisement

More than 1,000 people have already crossed the Channel in small boats during the first 23 days of 2025.

This follows 38,816 Channel crossings in 2024, the second highest total on record.

A Home Office spokesman said: “This Government is strengthening global partnerships and rooting out the criminal gangs who profit from small boat crossings which threaten lives.”

Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp called the figures “deeply alarming” and urged the Labour government to “urgently start deporting far more illegal immigrants.”

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

NewsBeat

How the Southport attack unfolded

Published

on

How the Southport attack unfolded
EPA Floral tributes left to the victims of the Southport knife attackEPA

“The dance club was full of laughter and excitement,” is how one girl, 14, described the atmosphere as a group of 26 children gathered for a Taylor Swift-themed class in Southport.

Their summer holidays had just begun and the sun was shining down on the town as they were dropped off by their parents. As the class got under way, 29 July 2024 had all the markings of a good day.

The attack that unfolded next saw Axel Rudakubana given a minimum of 52 years in prison. At his sentencing on Thursday, details of how the incident played out from the perspectives of those involved were revealed to the public for the first time.

With the class in full swing, a taxi driver followed a passenger he had just dropped off outside after he had refused to pay.

The passenger, in his teens, was not dressed for the weather: the hood of his thick green hoodie was pulled tight around his face and he was wearing a surgical mask. Inside his pocket was a 20cm kitchen knife.

Advertisement

Initially, Axel Rudakubana could not figure how to get into the studio and was caught on CCTV struggling with a locked door – but then he spotted another entrance and stepped inside.

That was, as one child survivor put it, the “beginning of my nightmare”.

Warning: This article contains distressing and upsetting details.

‘It wasn’t a prank’

Advertisement

Accounts from inside the dance class confirm that Rudakubana moved calmly and purposefully.

He had been planning this moment for some time. He did not hesitate, grabbing and stabbing the girl nearest to the door as soon as he walked in.

As Rudakubana attacked, he did not say a word.

For those inside the room, it took a moment to comprehend what was happening.

Advertisement

“I thought the man who stabbed me was a cleaner,” one of the child victims recounted.

It must be a practical joke, she thought, but later said: “I realised it wasn’t a prank when I saw blood coming out of me”.

Her memories of what happened next are “fuzzy”, but the child said she remembers thinking: “I don’t want to die, I have got to get out of here”.

Another victim said the image of Rudakubana in her memory is that of a monster stalking around the studio.

Advertisement

In court, she would later tell her would-be killer: “The thing I remember most about you is your eyes.

“You looked possessed and you didn’t look human.”

PA Media Police responding to the Southport attackPA Media

The attack triggered a massive emergency response as responders battled to save lives

Leanne Lucas, who was leading the dance class, had first spotted Rudakubana outside when she went to open a window to let some air into the warm dance studio.

She thought nothing of it until the door swung open and he appeared.

Advertisement

What happened next, she said, left her and the girls with “scars we cannot un-see, scars we cannot move on from”.

The full horror of what was unfolding only became fully clear when she was stabbed in the back. She later told the girls: “I’m surviving for you”.

Heidi Liddle, who was also supervising the class, had been sitting on the floor helping the children to make friendship bracelets.

By the time she realised what was happening, the fast-moving attacker had already done unspeakable damage.

Advertisement

Heidi jumped into action and began trying to rush the girls towards the door.

One girl ran for a toilet on the other side of the landing and she followed.

Heidi locked the door behind them and pressed herself against it. Do not make a sound, she told the girl.

And then the door rattled. Rudakubana was still looking for victims.

Advertisement

Outside, she heard the screams of children who had not managed to escape.

‘Running for my life’

Rudakubana set out to kill as many children as he could: by the time the 15 minute frenzy was over, two girls were dead and one was dying.

Another eight children and two adults had been stabbed. Some were fighting for their lives.

Advertisement

If it was not for the quick-thinking and bravery of the girls, it is certain that more would have died.

One child remembers the world seeming to move in “slow motion” as Rudakubana moved towards her, attacking her friends as he made his way across the room.

Instinct kicked in.

She remembers “physically pushing” her friends who were still able to run as they fled down the stairs.

Advertisement

When she confronted Rudakubana in court by reading her statement, she told him: “I knew I was running for my life.

“I knew from your eyes you wanted to try to kill us all.”

When he was sentenced, the judge concluded that if Rudakubana had been able to, he would have killed each and every child present – and anyone else who got in his way.

Elsie Dot Stancombe, seven, Alice da Silva Aguiar, nine, and Bebe King

Elsie Dot Stancombe, seven, Alice da Silva Aguiar, nine, and Bebe King, six, lost their lives

One of the children who survived that day was stabbed 30 times. She was airlifted to hospital and doctors operated on her for six hours to try and save the use of her arms, hands and fingers.

Advertisement

“She watched two of the girls die,” her parents told investigators.

On one occasion during her recovery, the child told her parents: “I don’t know who I am anymore.”

But six months on, she is fighting back. Her mother said: “We could never be more proud of what she has achieved over the last six months.

“He has completely failed to destroy her spirit, her amazing sense of humour, her fierceness and her pure beautiful heart.”

Advertisement

The Southport survivors are slowly rebuilding their lives.

Investigators who dealt with the case said they were staggered by their spirit and resilience.

That was on full display when one girl was asked what she says when her classmates ask if she wishes she had not been there that day.

“In some ways, I wish I wasn’t,” she tells them.

Advertisement

“But also, if I wasn’t there, someone else would have been stabbed and they could have died – so I’m glad I might have stopped someone else getting hurt.”

Source link

Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Rachel Reeves to soften non-dom tax crackdown after ‘listening to concerns’ | Politics News

Published

on

Rachel Reeves to soften non-dom tax crackdown after 'listening to concerns' | Politics News

Rachel Reeves is to water down her crackdown on the non-dom tax status after analysis showed it had prompted an exodus of millionaires.

The chancellor said she would be tabling an amendment to the plans after “listening to the concerns” of non-domiciled residents.

Politics Live: Ed Miliband won’t resign over Heathrow decision

The announcement was welcomed by tax advisers – but one expert told Sky News that the government should go further and make it easier for wealthy people to move to the UK, especially in light of the Trump presidency.

Advertisement

“Non-dom” status allows someone who lives in the UK to avoid paying tax on money made abroad because their permanent home is considered outside of the country.

Labour’s manifesto vowed to abolish the status to “address unfairness in the tax system” and raise funds for public services.

The planned changes relate to rules governing the “temporary repatriation facility” – a transition window which will allow non-doms to bring overseas income into the UK and pay a reduced tax rate.

The arrangement was due to last for three years from April 2025, as announced in the October budget.

Advertisement

However, speaking at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Ms Reeves said she would be making this more generous.

She told the Wall Street Journal: “We have been listening to the concerns that have been raised by the non-dom community.

“And in the finance bill, we will be tabling an amendment which makes more generous the temporary repatriation facility, which enables non-doms to bring money into the UK without paying significant taxes.”

Ms Reeves extended the two-year transition window that the Conservative government had planned to three years in her budget back in October.

Advertisement

‘Millionaire exodus’

The new extension comes after analysts found over 10,000 millionaires left the UK in 2024, a 157% increase on 2023 – meaning the UK lost more wealthy residents than any other country except China.

The research, conducted by global analytics firm New World Health and investment migration advisers Henley & Partners, shows the UK became a net outflow country of millionaires after the Brexit vote in 2016, but the big haemorrhage happened last year.

Up until 2016, the UK had always been a net inflow country when it came to high-net-worth individuals.

Advertisement

Peter Ferrigno, group tax director at Henley & Partners, told Sky News today’s announcement shows the government had listened to warnings that “people can leave and will leave if they feel like they are being unfairly treated”.

However, while welcoming the changes, he said there needs to be “joined up thinking with migration rules” so it is easier for millionaires to come here and contribute to the economy.

He said millionaires were “leaving anyway” because of Brexit and the “perception that things weren’t working” – but Donald Trump’s presidency in the US is a chance to attract some back.

‘Skewered priorities’

Advertisement

Controversy over non-doms erupted in 2022 when it emerged Rishi Sunak’s wife Akshata Murty, the daughter of an Indian billionaire, had the tax status.

No 10 Downing Street
Image:
No 10 Downing Street

After the row she said she would start paying taxes on her overseas income as she did not want to be a “distraction” from her husband – then the prime minister.

Labour repeatedly used the issue to attack the Tories while in opposition, and scrapping the status was a centrepiece of their election campaign, promising to use the £1bn a year proceeds to fund NHS and dental appointments, and school breakfast clubs.

Downing Street said the move does not “change the overall approach” to the government’s policy, which is to replace non-doms with “a new internationally competitive resident-based system”.

But Carla Denyer, co-leader of the Green Party, accused the government of “totally skewed priorities” after it refused to row back down on its cut to winter fuel payments.

Advertisement

And the Tories said that Labour’s budget was “falling apart in front of our eyes”, with Ms Reeves “forced to admit” her plans to raise money “make the UK less attractive”.

A Treasury spokesperson said: “While we do not expect these changes to impact the £33.8bn of tax revenue that the OBR forecast to raise over five years, they reflect our continued engagement with stakeholders to make sure the reforms announced at budget operate as intended.

“The temporary repatriation facility is designed to encourage non-doms to bring their funds to the UK, encouraging them to spend and invest this money here.”

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Murder suspect arrested over woman’s death after manhunt by armed police

Published

on

Murder suspect arrested over woman’s death after manhunt by armed police

A man has been arrested on suspicion of murder after a woman was found seriously injured in the street and later died.

Devon and Cornwall Police launched a manhunt for Paul Antony Butler, 53, after the woman was discovered in Plymouth, Devon, on Wednesday.

He was located and arrested in Liskeard, Cornwall, around 20 miles from Plymouth, and is now in police custody, the force said.

The force will make a mandatory referral to the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) because of previous contact with the victim.

Advertisement

This is a breaking news story… More to follow

Source link

Continue Reading

NewsBeat

President Trump to ask OPEC to slash oil prices

Published

on

President Trump to ask OPEC to slash oil prices

President Donald Trump said he would ask Saudi Arabia and other Opec nations to “bring down the cost of oil” and doubled-down on his threat to use tariffs.

In a speech to executives at the World Economic Forum in Davos on Thursday, the US president said he was ‘surprised’ that Opec hadn’t brought down the price of oil before the elections.

“Right now the price is high enough that that war will continue,” he said, referring to the Russia-Ukraine war and suggesting that the higher oil price was helping to sustain funding for the conflict in Moscow.

“You gotta bring down the oil price, that will end that war. You could end that war,” he added

Advertisement

The president’s comments on the oil price came after he spoke to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman on Wednesday. According to Saudi State media Bin Salman pledged to invest as much as $600bn in the US over the next four years, however this figure was not mentioned in the White House statement after the call.

Despite the cordial exchange, Trump said he would be asking “the Crown Prince, who’s a fantastic guy, to round it out to around $1tn”.

The price of crude fell by 1% following Trump’s comments.

According to David Oxley, Chief Climate and Commodities Economist at Capital Economics these comments are in keeping with Trump’s desire for lower gasoline prices.

Advertisement

“[It’s] his clear intention to use energy as leverage over Russia to end the war in Ukraine. That said, lower oil prices will certainly not incentivise US oil producers to “drill, baby, drill” – particularly in high-cost Alaska.”

“Of course, Saudi Arabia would not be guaranteed to heed a request by President Trump to expand oil production and to bring down global oil prices.”

The US president’s appearance via video at the World Economic Forum marked his first address to a global audience since his inauguration earlier this week.

He used the platform to insist that companies around the world manufacture their products in the US or face bruising tariffs on imported goods entering the American market.

Advertisement

The president also said he would demand an immediate drop in interest rates, which he said had led to deeper deficits and resulted in what he described as economic calamity under the tenure of his predecessor, President Joe Biden.

“This begins with confronting the economic chaos caused by the failed policies of the last administration,” he said.

“Over the past four years, our government racked up $8 trillion in wasteful deficit spending and inflicted nation wrecking energy restrictions, crippling regulations and hidden taxes like never before.”

Trump also spoke of “good, clean, coal” to power data centres needed for artificial intelligence. “We need double the energy we currently have in the US, for AI to be as big as we want to have it,” he said, adding that he would use emergency decrees to speed the construction of new power plants.

Advertisement

“Nothing can destroy coal — not the weather, not a bomb, nothing,” said Trump.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025 WordupNews