Another day, another Mohamed Salah goal and another Liverpool win.

The Egypt forward has now scored three Champions League goals this season and 22 in 31 games in all competitions.

He has also set up another 17 for team-mates and his total of 39 goal involvements is the highest of any player in Europe’s big five leagues.

His latest goal set Liverpool on their way to victory against Lille and to securing their place in the Champions League last 16.

It was a nonchalant finish as he latched on to Curtis Jones’ superb through ball and lifted over the advancing Lucas Chevalier.

It was his 50th goal in Europe for Liverpool – with 44 coming in the Champions League, five in last season’s Europa League and one in Champions League qualifying.

His latest strike extends his record as the club’s leading European goalscorer and he has now scored 20 Champions League goals at Anfield.

Former Manchester City striker Sergio Aguero (23 at Etihad Stadium) and ex-Manchester United forward Ruud van Nistelrooy (23 at Old Trafford) are the only players to score more goals in the competition at a specific venue for an English team.

“There has always been a smile on Salah’s face but it’s just that belief in himself that he will score,” said former Liverpool defender Stephen Warnock on BBC Radio 5 Live.

“That’s what makes him so dangerous. That’s the elite mindset of a player of his calibre.”

He has also been directly involved in 18 goals in 15 appearances at Anfield this season (10 goals, eight assists in all competitions).

“He is a real talisman for Liverpool,” said former Reds striker Robbie Fowler on Amazon Prime.

“He is a game winner. He is very comfortable in front of goal.

“He is one of those players that if he misses a chance, he is not fazed because the next one he will score.

“We wax lyrical about Mohamed Salah and know what he is capable of.”

A vigil has been held for a father-of-two killed by police on Christmas Eve as his family question why police opened fire and say racism could be a factor.

Marcus Meade, 39, was killed after a five-hour stand off with West Mercia police officers at a property in Redditch, Worcestershire.

He had a knife, but his family say he was alone at the time and wasn’t a danger.

Well over 100 people were at Tuesday evening’s vigil, held outside the flat where he was shot.

Candles spelling out his name were lit and flowers laid as his parents spoke movingly of their love for their son and their shock at his death.

“This is the kind of stuff that you hear about in America. This is not the kind of stuff we have in Birmingham,” his father Anthony told Sky News.

“The only person Marcus would hurt is himself. He wouldn’t hurt anybody else – never,” added his mother Deborah Clarke.

The Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) is investigating.

In a statement, it said: “Officers forced entry to the property using distraction devices. Each device generates several loud bangs and flashes.

“At least one Taser was then discharged, and a firearms officer fired a single shot which hit Mr Meade in the chest.”

A West Mercia Police spokesperson said it would “not be appropriate for us to comment further while this [IOPC] investigation is ongoing. However, we will do so when we are able”.

Mr Meade died at the scene – and his father questions why police acted as they did.

“You’re going to send an armed police officer to a scene with a mental person, and they feel it’s necessary to put a gun on this person when there’s how many other options that they could have to chosen to disarm a person?” said Anthony Meade.

Mr Meade’s parents said he had suffered mental health problems since he was young and was known to police because he would often “cry out for help”.

“I’m not sure why this time they decided to send police with guns,” said Mr Meade.

The family have questioned whether racism was a factor in their son’s killing, and whether the fact it was Christmas Eve played a role.

“They wanted it sorted there and then so they could go home and enjoy the rest of the evening,” said Ms Clarke.

Mr Meade’s family said his brother was at the scene and wasn’t allowed to help with negotiations. They believe he could have been calmed down by a relative.

‘A living nightmare’

The family are demanding answers and want to see the police bodycam footage of the shooting.

“We want to know every single aspect of what’s gone on. What made them choose that decision to go in and kill our son like that? Every camera, we want to see all the footage,” said Mr Meade.

Read more from Sky News:
Southport attacker had ‘kill list’
Storm Eowyn to bring strong winds to UK

The family said the wait for answers while the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) investigates is “agonising”.

“He was beautiful,” said Mr Meade.

Ms Clarke added: “He was lovely. He would help anybody.”

Mr Meade’s parents are struggling to cope with their grief with so many unanswered questions about their son’s final moments.

“This has absolutely destroyed our family. It’s been a living nightmare,” said Mr Meade.

For free real time breaking news alerts sent straight to your inbox sign up to our breaking news emails

Sign up to our free breaking news emails

Sign up to our free breaking news emails

When one drug dealer couldn’t resist sending a cute picture of his French Bulldog to another gangster he had no idea he would be sealing his gang’s fate.

National Crime Agency detectives intercepted a message on a social media platform used by drug gangs and zoomed in on tiny Bob’s nametag.

Upon magnification, they could make out trafficker Danny Brown’s partner’s phone number proving an undeniable link to the dealers looking to send 448kg of amphetamine worth £45m to Australia.

Bob’s accidental role helped unravel his owner’s “sophisticated” plan to hide Class As in the arm of an excavator that led to the entire gang being jailed for a combined 163 years.

Gangsters Stefan Baldauf, 64, and Philip Lawson, 63, had even rigged an auction to ensure the drugs went to the correct customer in Australia.

But Baldauf, of Midhurst Road, Ealing dobbed himself in by sending an accidental selfie on EncroChat, revealing his reflection in a brass door sign.

open image in gallery

open image in gallery

Advertisement

Baldauf, who was jailed for 28 years in December 2022, was ordered to repay £1,007,637 on Monday at Kingston Crown Court. He has given three months to pay or will receive an extra seven years in jail.

Lawson who arranged a welder to cut the digger open and then seal it up again was sentenced to 23 years and ordered to pay £182,476.

He also has three months to pay with failure resulting in the imposition of another three years on his sentence.

open image in gallery

Advertisement

open image in gallery

Bob’s owner Danny Brown of Kings Hall Road, Bromley, Kent was jailed for 26 years and will face a confiscation hearing later in the year.

William Sartin, 63, of Timberlog Lane, Basildon, Essex who hid the excavator in his industrial unit was sentenced to 23 years.

Chris Hill, who led the NCA investigation, said: “These criminals did not care about the misery and exploitation that the supply of illegal drugs bring to UK and Australian communities.

“All they cared about was money.

“So these proceedings are immensely painful for them, hitting them in their pockets and are a crucial way of showing other organised criminals that the consequences do not end when the prison door slams shut.

“The NCA continues to do everything possible, working at home and abroad, to protect the public from the threat of illegal drugs supply.”

Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp faced tough questioning today over the previous Government’s failure to prevent the Southport dance class murders, after it emerged killer Axel Rudakubana had been referred to counter-extremism programme Prevent three times.

GB News presenter Ellie Costello directly challenged Philp, asking: “How did you fail to stop this man?”

READ THE FULL STORY HERE

Despite this loss, Aston Villa have been in good form lately, winning seven of their last 12 games in all competitions.

As well as competing in Europe, Villa are also battling for a top-four finish in the Premier League and key to their performances at home and abroad are strikers Ollie Watkins and Jhon Duran.

Watkins has scored 10 goals in all competitions so far this term while Duran has 12 but Emery has mostly opted to rotate the two, having been unable to get them to play effectively as a partnership.

Watkins started against Monaco with Duran joining him in attack in the 57th minute but neither were able to really threaten the hosts before full time.

“The last 20 minutes we played with two strikers and with two strikers we are not being organised with the positioning like I want,” Emery said.

“We have two good strikers. Playing with two strikers is my challenge. Both are very good players but today it didn’t work well.

“I made a mistake when I decided to play with two strikers. Until that moment we were more or less controlling the game.”

According to Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer, the Southport attack was “clearly intended to terrorise”.

But officially it wasn’t, and still isn’t, considered a terror attack because the police couldn’t identify the killer’s motive, so it falls outside the definition of terrorism.

Axel Rudakubana even admitted a terror charge – possessing a training manual useful to a terrorist – but without a motive it’s still not terrorism, apparently.

No wonder the public is confused – suspicious even that the government wanted to cover up the failure of its Prevent anti-extremism scheme, which Home Secretary Yvette Cooper now admits should have identified Rudakubana as a threat, especially as he was flagged three times.

The manual was found at his home a couple of days after the attack, but he wasn’t charged with the terror offence for another three months.

Again, easy to see why some people cried “cover-up”.

When asked about his decision to withhold information about the Southport attacker by Sky News political editor Beth Rigby, Sir Keir said he knew details about Rudakubana, as they were emerging, but it “would not have been right to disclose” them.

It’s easier to understand why other details of the police investigation were not revealed.

That’s normal when there is expected to be a criminal trial in which a jury must decide its verdict purely on what it hears in court, untainted by anything it might have heard or read before.

Read more:
‘Nothing off the table in Southport inquiry’
Missed opportunities to stop Southport killer
How people of Southport are trying to make sense of horror

The traditional media usually sticks to that rule because to flout it could land journalists in prison for breaching the Contempt of Court Act 1981.

A lot of information has emerged since Rudakubana pleaded guilty to murder on Monday, scrapping the need for a trial, but the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has still stopped some known details being published ahead of Thursday’s sentencing.

Of course, many social media users aren’t aware of, or simply don’t care about, the contempt laws and post in ignorance or malevolence some vital facts – plus the rumours and gossip – the rest of us have to keep schtum about.

Jurors are always warned to forget anything they read or hear outside the courtroom.

👉 Listen to Sky News Daily on your podcast app 👈

Crime hacks often think the Contempt Act is too restrictive in limiting what we can report. We hope it will be eased when the Law Commission reports on its ongoing review of the legislation.

The prime minister is not the first to highlight the growing threat from young misfits like Rudakubana; alone with a computer, their heads full of violent images and evil thoughts and hell-bent on achieving notoriety but without the fixed ideology of recognised terror groups.

The bosses of MI5 and counter-terror policing have both warned recently of the risks they pose without any direct influence from organisations like Isis and al Qaeda.

Sir Keir has vowed to consider changing the terrorism laws to accommodate such individuals and to try to rid the internet of extreme violence.

He should find the first of those ambitions rather easier to realise than the second.

Sir Keir Starmer has said there’s a new terror threat facing the UK – from “loners, misfits and young men in their bedroom” who carry out extreme violence and are fixated on it “seemingly for its own sake”.

The prime minister made his announcement the day after Axel Rudakubana pleaded guilty to the murder of three young girls in Southport last summer. A public inquiry into the failings that allowed the crime to take place is also under way.

After his guilty plea, it emerged Rudakubana was referred to the Prevent programme, a government-led agency set up to stop the spread of terrorism in the UK, three times in the 17 months before the attack, but a judgement was made that he did not require intervention.

New security threats on the rise

Data from the Prevent programme suggests that this trend isn’t new.

Prevent categorises the people who are referred to it by their belief system, for example Islamists, the far-right, incels, or people inspired by school massacres. There are also a handful of categories of people with either no clear ideology, or whose personal ideology sometimes takes on conflicting parts of different ideologies.

More people are already categorised as “vulnerable [to radicalisation], but with no ideology or counter-terror risk”, than any other category, including those with far-right or Islamist views. They were 36% of all referrals in 2023/24, up from 25% in 2019/20.

But only a small number of those cases are taken on by Channel, a deradicalisation programme that is effectively the next stage in the Prevent process, for people who are assessed to be most in need of intervention.

Dame Sara Khan, a former counter-extremism commissioner, told Sky News: “This is not a new phenomenon. If many of these individuals did not meet the threshold for Channel, what support or counter-radicalisation interventions did they receive – if any?

“There is no effective system in place to deal with such individuals and they will continue to pose a serious concern.”

The growth of ‘pick and mix’ extremism

A mix of factors is driving the growth in extremist ideologies that don’t fit into specific ideological brackets – what some experts call “pick and mix” extremist ideologies. The spread of misinformation and ease of access to radical information online is undoubtedly one of them.

A recent survey by anti-racism campaign group HNH showed that nearly three quarters of 16 to 24-year-olds say they had come across content that is either hateful, violent, extremist or terrorist online.

But the offline world is part of the cause too. Dame Sara’s recent report on extremism highlights how issues like immigration or the cost-of-living crisis could create a social climate that makes more people susceptible to extremism.

The public inquiry into the Southport attack could expose the flaws in Prevent’s system of working. The programme was originally created to deal with traditional terrorism and experts suggest that its mechanisms don’t work with the complexities of self-initiated radicalisation based on the internet.

Dr Joe Ondrak, an expert in online radicalisation, pointed out that this is not the only recent case where a perpetrator has followed this path to extremism, saying “Rudakubana and cases like Cameron Finnegan… they are different. But the mechanisms and the ingredients for that kind of radicalisation, they’re picking from the same supermarket shelves of self-initiated radicalisation”.

Al Baker, managing director at Prose Intelligence, an open-source intelligence company that researches extremist activity on Telegram, says it could be “a long overdue rethinking of what our counterterrorism strategy should look like in the age where self-radicalisation is a lot more normal”.

The Data and Forensics team is a multi-skilled unit dedicated to providing transparent journalism from Sky News. We gather, analyse and visualise data to tell data-driven stories. We combine traditional reporting skills with advanced analysis of satellite images, social media and other open-source information. Through multimedia storytelling, we aim to better explain the world while also showing how our journalism is done.

Donald Trump has officially been sworn in as the forty-seventh President of the United States of America.

Despite a long list of lawsuits, an assassination attempt, and the best efforts of the democrats and their many celebrity backers, Donald swept the US election, winning all swing states and with it the keys to the White House.