Connect with us

Politics

Boost BBC World Service Funding To Help Ukraine Fight Russia, Says Labour MP

Published

on

Boost BBC World Service Funding To Help Ukraine Fight Russia, Says Labour MP

(Alamy)


3 min read

A Labour MP is leading calls for the BBC World Service to be given a funding boost, arguing that it has helped Ukraine fight Russia by combatting disinformation.

Advertisement

Uma Kumaran, the newly-elected Labour MP for Stratford and Bow and member of the foreign affairs committee said the service — which the BBC estimates reaches 320m people a week worldwide on average — should be championed more as a source of “impartial” and “trusted” news in war-torn countries.

The Labour MP told PoliticsHome that the BBC World Service had helped fight Russian “misinformation and disinformation” in countries such as Moldova, where bad actors were using money to “skew” election results.

Kumaran met a delegation of Moldovan MPs in November who told their British counterparts about their experience of living in a nation that borders Ukraine.

Advertisement

She said the World Service funds a “huge part” of the Moldovan national news network, “to put information out there, to spread news of their culture, of the things they do”.

“People love the particular programs that it produces,” Kumaran said.

“They love that it’s a trusted source of information.

“But then I asked them [visiting MPs], ‘do people know that that’s actually the BBC World Service doing it?’ and they said, ‘probably not’.

Advertisement

“Here’s this massive thing we’re doing, helping out with the war effort in Ukraine, helping Moldovans feel more at ease with what’s going on, helping our partners and other governments. But no one here knows about it.”

Kumaran criticised “unprecedented” cuts to the BBC World Service over the last 14 years under Conservative-led governments.

The corporation faced further financial pressure when the previous Tory administration said it would freeze the BBC license fee for two years between April 2022-2024.

Advertisement

Chancellor Rachel Reeves set out an “increase in funding” for the World Service to ensure it can continue its language services in the November Budget.

Kumaran said she was “really pleased” about the extra funding the corporation had received but argued there was scope for more investment in its international coverage.

Uma Kumuran
BBC World Service funding is “still at very, very low levels”, says Labour MP Uma Kumaran

“I’m really pleased in this year’s Budget, the Chancellor after receiving representations from the Foreign Office, the BBC themselves, and lots of others at the Department for Culture, Media and Sport, has put a good whack of funding into the BBC.

“But it’s still at very, very low levels,” she said.

“It’s not just about money. You look at it in monetary terms, and you see a couple of million going into BBC World Service, you think ‘actually, that’s quite a lot of money’.

Advertisement

“But the soft power and the diplomatic power, and our place in the world, you cannot put a number on.”

Kumaran said channels such as Russia Today, SputnikTV and Chinese state media had filled the vacuum left by the BBC’s decision to reduce or shut down its reporting in towns and cities located in war-torn countries.

“We [the foreign affairs committee] uncovered that in every place where BBC World Service radio has been shut, it’s either Russia Today, Sputnik or Chinese state media, have been spending between $6-8bn on putting money into these services,” she said.

“The starkest [example] I can give you is radio BBC Arabia, which covers the length and depth of the Middle East, including vital radio services in Gaza.

Advertisement

“It’s a different world. Handheld radios are a thing. Car radios are much more of a thing. Digitisation hasn’t yet hit and so they absolutely rely on this service.”

PoliticsHome Newsletters

PoliticsHome provides the most comprehensive coverage of UK politics anywhere on the web, offering high quality original reporting and analysis: Subscribe

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Politics

Ben Habib warns Britain risks ‘wipeout’ if it doesn’t follow Donald Trump fundamentals: ‘Get on that bandwagon!’

Published

on

Political commentator Ben Habib has warned that Britain risks being “wiped out” if it fails to follow America’s conservative reform agenda, as demonstrated by Donald Trump’s sweeping executive actions in his first days back in office.

Speaking on GBN America, Habib endorsed Trump’s extensive Day one policy changes, which included over 100 executive measures targeting immigration, climate policy and diversity programmes.


The former Brexit Party MEP cautioned that the UK faces an exodus of millionaires and expertise to America unless it adopts similar reforms.

“The world is a very fluid place for expertise and capital and it will go to where it finds its best home,” Habib said.

Advertisement
Ben Habib, Donald Trump and Keir Starmer

Ben Habib called on Starmer to follow in Trump’s footsteps

GBN AMERICA / PA / GB NEWS

Trump’s first day back in office saw him sign 45 executive orders, 11 memoranda, five proclamations and four sub-cabinet appointments, whilst revoking 78 Biden-era orders.

Advertisement

The flurry of activity began moments after his swearing-in at the US Capitol, before moving to a packed Capital One Arena where he signed orders dismantling key Biden policies.

LATEST DEVELOPMENTS

Ben Habib

Ben Habib spoke on GBN America

Advertisement

GBN AMERICA

Major changes included declaring a national emergency at the southern border, ending federal diversity programmes, and withdrawing from the Paris Climate Agreement.

Trump also ordered the termination of electric vehicle mandates and established a new Department of Government Efficiency.

“With these actions, we will begin the complete restoration of America and the revolution of common sense,” Trump declared in his inaugural address.

Advertisement

The new president’s border initiatives included reinstating the “Remain in Mexico” policy and designating cartels as foreign terrorist organisations.

Donald TrumpDonald TrumpREUTERS

His order on federal workers stripped job protections from career officials in policy roles, making it easier to dismiss them.

Trump also signed measures requiring government employees to return to in-person work and establishing new rules for security clearances.

In a symbolic move, he ordered the renaming of Alaska’s Denali back to Mount McKinley and proposed changing the Gulf of Mexico to the Gulf of America.

Advertisement

The president celebrated his actions by tossing signing pens to supporters at the Capital One Arena.

Habib urged Labour leader Keir Starmer to look across the Atlantic, warning that without similar reforms, Britain would see “an even faster growing US, an even more attractive US with a further exodus of millionaires from the UK”.

“We have driven it out of the UK already through a really bad set of policies, even before Labour won the election,” he told GBN America.

He argued that Trump “is showing that what we have been doing for the last 27 years, the liberal, global approach to governance is not the way to run a country”.

Advertisement

“He is showing us the way to do it and we better get on that bandwagon or we will be wiped out,” Habib concluded.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Donald Trump ‘personally asked Boris Johnson’ to witness his swearing in while Nigel Farage ‘did not make the cut’

Published

on

Donald Trump personally asked Boris Johnson to witness his swearing in as President, and has a “good working relationship” with him, says former Tory Security minister Tom Tugendhat.

Tugendhat, who was in Washington DC last week ahead of the President’s inauguration, said Trump has personally asked Johnson to be in the rotunda on Capitol Hill to witness personally his swearing in.


Earlier this week Nigel Farage, the leader of Reform UK, told GB News that he had not “made the cut” and been invited to sit in the Rotunda audience.

Tugendhat told today’s Chopper’s Political Podcast that he had been told by “members of the administration” that it was “a personal decision by the President” to invite Johnson to be there.

Advertisement

Donald Trump personally asked Boris Johnson to witness his swearing in as President, and has a “good working relationship” with him, says former Tory Security minister Tom Tugendhat

Getty

He said: “It is very clear to me that that was a personal choice by the president choosing people who he was close to, to be around him on the day.”

Advertisement

He added: “It wasn’t a large list. There’s not that many people can fit in there. And the President went through the list personally and removed some names and added [others].”

Tugendhat added that Johnson – who has in the past intimated he wants a way back into politics – “has had a very good working relationship with Donald Trump.

Tom Tugendhat, who was in Washington DC last week ahead of the President’s inauguration, said Trump has personally asked Johnson to be in the rotunda on Capitol Hill to witness personally his swearing in

Advertisement

GB News

“He’s got a lot of friends in Washington.

“He’s got a voice that reaches parts that other politicians don’t reach.”

Listen or watch Chopper’s Political Podcast on Apple Podcasts, Spotify or GB News’ YouTube channel.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Rupert Lowe skewers human rights lawyer over outrageous illegal immigrant demand: ‘Pork barrelling a living!’

Published

on

Reform UK MP Rupert Lowe has strongly rejected calls for an amnesty for illegal migrants in Britain, following suggestions by human rights lawyer Ivon Sampson.

Speaking on GB News, Sampson argued that offering an amnesty would enable better tracking of migrants, stating: “The only sensible thing to do is to offer an amnesty – then we have a sensible policy of ensuring those people who come in are tracked.”


Lowe hit back, saying: “These human rights lawyers pork barrel a living on the back of all this Tony Blair legislation which has created our problem.”

He called for tougher measures, suggesting migrants should be placed in “uncomfortable, untented camps” on remote islands.

Advertisement
Ivon Sampson and Rupert Lowe

Rupert Lowe said human rights lawyers like Sampson are ‘pork barrelling a living’

GB NEWS

The clash comes as new figures reveal up to one in 12 people living in London are illegal migrants.

Advertisement

A previously confidential report commissioned by Thames Water estimates between 390,355 and 585,533 illegal migrants are living in the capital, with a median figure of 487,944.

LATEST DEVELOPMENTS

u200bReform's Rupert Lowe joined Matt Goodwin on GB News

Reform’s Rupert Lowe joined Matt Goodwin on GB News

Advertisement

GB NEWS

The study, conducted by Edge Analytics and Leeds University experts, suggests most illegal migrants initially arrived on work, study or visitor visas before overstaying.

The research indicates around one million illegal migrants could be living in the UK, with 60 per cent concentrated in London.

The findings were obtained through Freedom of Information requests to Thames Water, who commissioned the study to better understand their “hidden” service users.

Advertisement

Reform UK chairman Zia Yusuf warned the situation represents “not just a national emergency, it’s a national security emergency.”

Matt Goodwin and Ivon Sampson

The human rights lawyer argued in favour of giving all illegal migrants amnesty

GB NEWS

Advertisement

He expressed particular concern about demographics, noting: “90 per cent of the people crossing the Channel are men.”

“The number of military age males making that journey legally surpasses the number of available soldiers, both standing and territorial,” Yusuf told GB News.

Deputy Reform UK leader Richard Tice added: “One in 12 people in London are here illegally, probably working illegally using taxpayer-funded public infrastructure and services. It is totally unacceptable.”

The Home Office reports having removed 16,400 illegal migrants in the past six months, the highest figure in half a decade.

Advertisement

More than 1,000 people have already crossed the Channel in small boats during the first 23 days of 2025.

This follows 38,816 Channel crossings in 2024, the second highest total on record.

A Home Office spokesman said: “This Government is strengthening global partnerships and rooting out the criminal gangs who profit from small boat crossings which threaten lives.”

Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp called the figures “deeply alarming” and urged the Labour government to “urgently start deporting far more illegal immigrants.”

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Donald Trump poised to release JFK assassination files as President signs latest executive order

Published

on

Donald Trump has signed an executive order to release the assassination files of John F Kennedy, Robert Kennedy and Martin Luther King Jr.

In his latest high-profile signing since returning to the White House on Monday, Trump vowed that “all will be revealed” as he put pen to paper on bringing the details of JFK’s death to light.


“That’s a a big one, huh?” Trump said to reporters in the Oval Office. “A lot of people have been waiting for this for years, for decades. Everything will be revealed.”

And in a show of faith to JFK’s nephew – and Trump’s incoming health secretary – Robert F Kennedy Jr, the President directed aides to pass the signing pen to his key ally.

Advertisement
Trump with executive order

‘That’s a a big one, huh?’ Trump said to reporters in the Oval Office

REUTERS

On the campaign trail on the path back to office, Trump had vowed to release classified intelligence and law enforcement files on JFK’s mysterious November 1963 killing.

Advertisement

On Sunday, he told supporters at a Washington DC rally: “In the coming days, we are going to make public remaining records related to the assassinations of President John F Kennedy, his brother Robert Kennedy, as well as Dr Martin Luther King Jr and other topics of great public interest.”

But he may face resistance from what he calls the “swamp”.

Trump had released some documents related to the assassination, but ultimately caved to pressure from the Central Intelligence Agency and Federal Bureau of Investigation, and kept a significant chunk of documents under wraps over “national security concerns”.

Soon-to-be-health chief RFK Jr has said he believes the CIA was involved in his uncle’s death – which the agency has described as “baseless”.

Advertisement

Kennedy Jr has also said he believes his father, Robert Kennedy, was killed by multiple gunmen – which flies in the face of public accounts of his death.

More to follow…

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Axel Rudakubana: Labour blasted for ‘double standards’ over failings

Published

on

Former chancellor Kwasi Kwarteng has accused authorities of suppressing crucial information about the Southport dance class killer, claiming they presented him as “a Welsh choir boy” to the public.

Speaking on GB News, Kwarteng said officials “clearly knew things about the killer which they suppressed” in the aftermath of the attacks.


“At the time of the murder, they essentially were presenting the killer as a Welsh choir boy,” he said.

The former chancellor suggested there was a deliberate withholding of information about Axel Rudakubana’s background and potential motivations.

Advertisement
Kwasi Kwarteng, Axel Rudakubana

GB News / CPS

“Either they suppressed it for whatever reason, and we need to get to the bottom of it, or it was a cover up because they felt that in that very patronising way, they felt that people couldn’t handle that information,” Kwarteng said.

Rudakubana, 18, pleaded guilty earlier this week to murdering three young girls at a Taylor Swift-themed dance class in Southport last July.

He is due to be sentenced today at Liverpool Crown Court – while his crimes could warrant a whole life order, this cannot be applied as he was 17 at the time of the offences.

Advertisement

Kwarteng claimed Merseyside Police were instructed by “people on high” not to release information they had about the case.

u200bAxel Rudakubanau200b

Axel Rudakubana will be sentenced in court today for the Southport attack

CPS/PA

“What was so crazy about that was that it actually stoked the very thing that they wanted to avoid because people were kept in the dark,” he said.

Advertisement

LATEST DEVELOPMENTS:

The former chancellor pointed to what he called an “obvious double standard” in how the case was handled.

“Picture a situation where the terrorist, the killer, had been a white teenager who had been found with white supremacist literature, who then went out and killed three girls of ethnic origin,” he said.

“There wouldn’t be this debate. They would have denounced it,” Kwarteng added. He also criticised how Rudakubana had “slipped through the net” despite being repeatedly referred to Prevent.

Advertisement

Starmer has defended his position on withholding information about the Southport killer. The Prime Minister insisted he was following “the law of the land” to prevent the case against Rudakubana from collapsing.

Kwasi Kwarteng

Kwarteng questioned how the 18-year-old ‘slipped through the net’ after being referred to Prevent three times

GB News

Advertisement

“You know and I know that it would not have been right to disclose those details,” Starmer told reporters. “The only losers if the details had been disclosed would be the victims and the families because it ran the risk the trial would collapse.”

Rudakubana faces a life sentence, with a minimum term to be set by the judge before he can be considered for release. Chief Constable Serena Kennedy said investigations revealed “a man with a unhealthy obsession with extreme violence” but noted that “no one ideology was uncovered.”

Deputy Chief Crown Prosecutor Ursula Doyle described it as “an unspeakable attack” that turned what should have been a day of “carefree innocence” into “a scene of the darkest horror.”

“It is clear that this was a young man with a sickening and sustained interest in death and violence,” she added.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

‘We have to kick start the economy!’ MP defends building plans as Labour accused of ‘ignoring will of the people’

Published

on

Labour MP Matthew Pennycook has defended the Government’s new planning reforms, insisting that local communities will retain their right to object to developments.

Speaking to GB News, Pennycook emphasised that “no one is saying that the views of local communities should be ignored”.


The defence comes as part of Labour’s broader initiative to streamline planning processes for major infrastructure projects across the UK.

The Government plans to reduce the number of legal challenges allowed against major infrastructure projects from three to one for “cynical cases lodged purely to cause delay.”

Advertisement
Matthew Pennycook

Matthew Pennycook said that they are not ignoring local communities

GB News

Speaking to GB News, Pennycook said: “No one is saying that the views of local communities, local people up and down the country, should be ignored under any of the changes we’re making. People will still have a right to object to planning applications.

Advertisement

“They will keep the right to challenge the lawfulness of government decisions. What we’re saying today is that as part of our plan for change, we’ve got to kick start economic growth.

LATEST DEVELOPMENTS

“We’ve got to streamline the delivery of the critical national infrastructure that our country needs, whether that’s energy, transport or aviation projects.

“We already made a number of changes to national planning policy last year to aid with that objective. We’re making further changes to the planning and infrastructure bill we’re bringing forward in the coming months.

Advertisement

“As part of that package, what we’re saying today is that your ability to bring forward repeated judicial review permission requests shouldn’t be allowed.

“We’re going to reduce the number of those permission requests from three to two in most cases. And in cases where a judge says that this challenge has no merit whatsoever from three to one, that will get the delivery of critical national infrastructure speeded up.

Keir Starmer

Keir Starmer has vowed to defeat what he calls “blockers”

PA

Advertisement

“That will have a real world impact. Because, I’m sure your viewers put it to you repeatedly, it is just too difficult to get anything built in this country.”

The changes follow recommendations from Lord Banner KC’s review of legal challenges against major building projects.

Lord Banner said: “I saw broad consensus from claimants to scheme promoters that a quicker system of justice would be in their interests, provided that cases can still be tried fairly.”

Prime Minister Keir Starmer has vowed to defeat what he calls “blockers” who are preventing the UK from completing vital infrastructure projects.

Advertisement
Matthew Pennycook

The government plans to reduce the number of legal challenges allowed against major infrastructure project

GB News

“For too long, blockers have had the upper hand in legal challenges – using our court processes to frustrate growth,” Starmer said.

Advertisement

He added: “We’re putting an end to this challenge culture by taking on the NIMBYs and a broken system that has slowed down our progress as a nation.”

The Prime Minister described the reforms as “taking the brakes off Britain by reforming the planning system so it is pro-growth and pro-infrastructure.”

According to the government, projects that have faced significant delays include the Sizewell C nuclear plant, the A47 national highway project and new windfarms in East Anglia.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Inheritance tax raid on military families will raise ‘nothing’ for Treasury, ex-Chancellor claims

Published

on

Former Chancellor Kwasi Kwarteng has branded Labour’s plans to impose inheritance tax on military families as “total insanity”, warning the measure would raise “nothing” for the Treasury.

Speaking to GB News, Kwarteng criticised the policy that will affect death-in-service payments for Armed Forces personnel from April 2027.

FULL STORY HERE.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

State pension age row erupts as MPs launch investigation into Waspi ‘injustice’

Published

on

MPs have called for an urgent inquiry into the Labour Government’s decision not to compensate Women Against State Pension Inequality (Waspi) women impacted by historic policy decisions.

The All-Party Parliamentary Group (APPG) for State Pension Inequality for Women has urged the Work and Pensions Committee to investigate the Government’s response to a damning ombudsman report.


This request follows the government’s acceptance of maladministration in communicating pension changes to 1950s-born women, despite its refusal to provide financial compensation.

The Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman (PHSO) launched its investigation in 2018 to examine potential injustice which reportedly impacted 3.8 million older women.

Advertisement

In the investigation, the PHSO focused on whether these women suffered due to “maladministration” in how the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) communicated state pension age changes.

Do you have a money story you’d like to share? Get in touch by emailing money@gbnews.uk.

Waspi protest and Westminster

MPs have launched an inquiry into Waspi women “injustice”

Advertisement

GETTY

The probe was specifically designed to determine if the DWP’s communication methods regarding the changes to women’s state pension age were adequate.

Following the report’s findings, the government acknowledged there had been maladministration in how changes were communicated, but rejected the PHSO’s proposed remedy. The Government subsequently confirmed it would not provide any financial compensation to women born in the 1950s.

As part of its inquiry, the APPG has now asked the Work and Pensions Committee to evaluate whether the government’s decision to withhold financial redress was justified.

Advertisement

Furthermore, the parliamentary group specifically highlighted concerns about the PHSO’s statistics regarding women’s awareness of the pension changes and how official correspondence was interpreted and retained.

The PHSO investigation revealed that the DWP had provided adequate and accurate information between 1995 and 2004. However, the probe found that DWP decision-making between 2005 and 2007 resulted in a significant delay.

This delay meant there was a 28-month gap before the department began sending letters to 1950s-born women about their state pension age changes.

APPG co-chairs Rebecca Long-Bailey and Bryn Davies expressed deep concern over the Government’s stance. “As you can imagine many of those women who have suffered this injustice are simply devastated and perplexed by the Governments response,” they said.

Advertisement

The co-chairs formally requested the committee to consider “opening an inquiry or holding a one-off session into the Governments response.” The APPG has called for an investigation into what financial redress options were considered and costed by the DWP.

The group also wants to know whether additional compensation options remain available for consideration.

As well as this, parliamentary group noted that while the Work and Pensions Committee lacks legal powers to force government action, it has historically played a crucial role.

LATEST DEVELOPMENTS:

Advertisement

The committee has previously been instrumental in scrutinising government responses to PHSO reports.

As well as this, the APPG has requested that the committee publish its own response to the government’s handling of the PHSO report.

“It is gravely concerning that without such scrutiny in this instance, a precedent may be set by this case where the government rejects the PHSO’s independent review and central recommendations without further challenge and discussion,” the co-chairs stated.

The group emphasised that proper scrutiny of the government’s response to the PHSO report was essential to maintain the integrity of independent reviews.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Barrister demands change to the law as Axel Rudakubana avoids life sentence by TEN days: ‘It’s evil!’

Published

on

A UK Barrister has said the law “should be changed” on handing life sentences to those under 18, as Axel Rudakubana is set to avoid a whole life sentence for the Southport attack.

Speaking to GB News, Steven Barrett said that Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer “should have used his majority” in Parliament to change the law ahead of Rudakubana’s sentencing.


The Southport triple-killer will be sentenced today at Liverpool Crown Court – but while his crimes could warrant a whole life order, this cannot be applied as he was 17 at the time of the offences.

A minimum term will be instead set by the judge before he can be considered for release.

Advertisement
Axel Rudakubana sketch, Steven Barrett

Barrister Steven Barrett has demanded a change in the law for life sentences ahead of the decision on Axel Rudakubana’s killings

CPS / GB News

Admitting that the case is “rare” for such a law to be changed, Barrett told GB News that the Labour Government could have “taken action” to avoid Rudakubana avoiding the full hand of justice.

Advertisement

Barrett fumed: “I would have liked my country and my Prime Minister to have taken action to avoid that. But that’s where we are.

“The Prime Minister will talk about votes for 16 year olds, but the idea that they might be liable for their criminal actions, apparently there has to be a gap between that. And I think we as a country need to look at this.”

Expressing his outrage at the Southport attack and the apparent failings of the Prevent scheme which allowed Rudakubana to “slip through the net”, Barrett declared that the July 2024 killings were “evil”, and the details of the incident are “horrific”.

u200bAxel Rudakubanau200bAxel Rudakubana will be sentenced in court today for the Southport attackCPS/PA

Barrett said: “I just want to be absolutely unequivocal. This is evil. What we’re going to discover and the details that are going to come out are horrific.

Advertisement

“He didn’t just murder three beautiful, innocent children. He stabbed ten other people grotesquely, and he traumatised everybody who wasn’t stabbed.”

LATEST DEVELOPMENTS:

When pressed by host Miriam Cates on Keir Starmer’s defence of the “information vacuum” following the attack, Barrett claimed that the country “doesn’t have an honest Prime Minister”.

He stated: “I don’t believe the Prime Minister, to be honest, that claim doesn’t stack up on any level. He says he couldn’t have told us in August that it was terrorism, and then he tells us in October that it’s terrorism – he knew back then.

Advertisement

“I’m afraid the only conclusion that a rational person can draw is that we don’t have an honest Prime Minister.”

Barrett added: “In the grand scheme of things, he’s [Rudakubana] avoiding a whole life tariff because of ten days. That seems to me a technicality.”

Steven Barrett

Barrett told GB News that Prime Minister Keir Starmer is ‘dishonest’

Advertisement

GB News

Praising the “bravery” of Leanne Lucas and John Hayes, who were two adults stabbed in defence of the children in the Southport attack, Barrett called for the “heroes” to be honoured, following the sentencing.

Barrett concluded: “I think the two of them are absolute heroes, and we as a country should do something for Leanne and John. We should honour them, we should make them knights and dames.

“Rudakubana represents absolute evil, and they represent good. They are heroes in our society and we are lucky to have them.”

Advertisement

Starmer has defended his position on withholding information about the Southport killer. The Prime Minister insisted he was following “the law of the land” to prevent the case against Rudakubana from collapsing.

“You know and I know that it would not have been right to disclose those details,” Starmer told reporters. “The only losers if the details had been disclosed would be the victims and the families because it ran the risk the trial would collapse.”

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Donald Trump birthright citizenship order temporarily halted as judge labels move ‘blatantly unconstitutional’

Published

on

Donald Trump’s executive order ending birthright citizenship in the US has been blocked by a judge.

Judge John Coughenour has issued a temporary restraining order to clamp down on Donald Trump’s ban, which would have seen undocumented migrants in the US unable to register their children as American citizens.


Coughenour claimed the order was “blatantly unconstitutional”, and his intervention has seen the move halted for the next 14 days.

“I have been on the bench for over four decades. I can’t remember another case whether the question presented was as clear,” the judge said.

Advertisement
Trump

Judge John Coughenour has issued a temporary restraining order to clamp down on Donald Trump’s ban

REUTERS

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025 WordupNews