Connect with us

Politics

Economic Update | Daily Politics

Published

on

Economic Update (8 Jul 2020)

Rishi Sunak The Chancellor of the Exchequer

I stood here in March saying I knew people were worried, and I know they are worried still. We have taken decisive action to protect our economy, but people are anxious about losing their job and about unemployment rising. We are not just going to accept that. People need to know that we will do all we can to give everyone the opportunity of good and secure work. People need to know that although hardship lies ahead, no one will be left without hope. So today, we act with a plan for jobs. Our plan has a clear goal: to protect, support and create jobs. It will give businesses the confidence to retain and hire, to create jobs in every part of our country, to give young people a better start and to give people everywhere the opportunity of a fresh start. Where problems emerge, we will confront them. Where support is justified, we will provide it. Where challenges arise, we will overcome them. We entered this crisis unencumbered by dogma and we continue in that spirit, driven always by the simple desire to do what is right.

Before I turn to our plan for jobs, let me first outline the nature of the challenge. Our economic response to coronavirus is moving through three phases. In the first phase, beginning in March, the Government announced social distancing measures and ordered businesses to close, halting the spread of the disease. We put in place one of the largest and most comprehensive economic responses in the world. Our £160 billion plan protects people’s jobs, incomes and businesses. We supported more than 11 million people and jobs through the job retention and self-employment schemes, alongside billions of pounds for the most vulnerable. We supported over 1 million businesses to protect jobs through tax cuts, tax deferrals, direct cash grants and over 1 million Government-backed loans. And we supported public services, with new funding for the NHS, schools, public transport and local authorities. In total, we have now provided £49 billion to support public services since this crisis began.

Advertisement

Analysis I am publishing today shows our interventions significantly protected people’s incomes, with the least well off in society supported the most, and this crisis has highlighted the special bond which holds our country together. Millions of people in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland have been protected by the UK Government’s economic interventions, and they will be supported by today’s plan for jobs. No nationalist can ignore the undeniable truth: this help has only been possible because we are a United Kingdom.

Four months on, as we carefully reopen our economy, we are entering the second phase of our economic response. Despite the extraordinary support we have already provided, we face profound economic challenges. World economic activity has slowed, with the International Monetary Fund expecting the deepest global recession since records began. Household consumption—the biggest component of our economy—has fallen steeply. Businesses have stopped trading and stopped hiring. Taken together, in just two months our economy contracted by 25%, the same amount that it grew by in the previous 18 years. And the independent Office for Budget Responsibility and Bank of England are both projecting significant job losses, the most urgent challenge we now face. I want every person in this House and in the country to know that I will never accept unemployment as an unavoidable outcome. We have not done everything we have so far just to step back now and say, “Job done.” In truth, the job has only just begun.

If the first phase of our economic response was about protection and the second phase—the phase we are addressing today—is about jobs, there will come a third phase, where we will rebuild. My right hon. Friend the Prime Minister has set out our vision to level up, unite the country, spread opportunity, and repair and heal the wounds exposed through this crisis. I can tell the House that we will produce a Budget and spending review in the autumn.

And we will deal, too, with the challenges facing our public finances. Over the medium term, we must, and we will, put our public finances back on a sustainable footing. In other words, our plan for jobs will not be the last action, but is merely the next, in our fight to recover and rebuild after coronavirus.

Advertisement

Let me now turn to the detail of our plan for jobs. Central to our economic response has been the jobs retention scheme. Furlough has been a lifeline for millions, supporting people and businesses to protect jobs, but it cannot, and should not, go on forever. I know that when furlough ends it will be a difficult moment. I am also sure that if I say the scheme must end in October, critics will say it should end in November. If I say it should end in November, critics will just say December. But the truth is, calling for endless extensions to the furlough is just as irresponsible as it would have been, back in June, to end the scheme overnight.

We have to be honest: leaving the furlough scheme open forever gives people false hope that it will always be possible to return to the jobs they had before. The longer people are on furlough, the more likely it is that their skills will fade, and they will find it harder to get new opportunities. It is in no one’s long-term interests for the scheme to continue forever, least of all those trapped in a job that can exist only because of Government subsidy. So the furlough will wind down, flexibly and gradually, supporting businesses and people through to October.

While we cannot protect every job, one of the most important things we can do to prevent unemployment is to get as many people as possible from furlough back to their jobs. So, today, we are introducing a new policy to reward and incentivise employers who successfully bring furloughed staff back—a new jobs retention bonus.

If you are an employer and you bring back someone who was furloughed, and you continuously employ them through to January, we will pay you a £1,000 bonus per employee. It is vital that people are not just returning for the sake of it; they need to be doing decent work. For businesses to get the bonus, the employee must be paid at least £520, on average, in each month from November to January, the equivalent of the lower earnings limit in national insurance.

Advertisement

The House should understand the significance of this policy. We will pay the bonus for all furloughed employees. So if employers bring back all 9 million people who have been furloughed, that would be a £9 billion policy to retain people in work. Our message to business is clear: if you stand by your workers, we will stand by you.

The furlough was the right policy to support people through the first phase of this crisis, but now, in this new phase, we need to evolve our approach. Today, I want to set out for the House a new three-point plan for jobs. We need to: first, support people to find jobs; secondly, create jobs; and, thirdly, protect jobs.

Let me start with supporting jobs, in particular the help we want to provide for those who will be hardest hit by this crisis: younger people. Over 700,000 people are leaving education this year. Many more are just starting out in their careers. Coronavirus has hit them hard—under-25s are two and a half times as likely to work in a sector that has been closed.

We cannot lose that generation, so today I am announcing the kick-start scheme, a new programme to give hundreds of thousands of young people in every region and every nation of Britain the best possible chance of getting on and getting a job. The kick-start scheme will pay employers directly to create new jobs for any 16 to 24-year-old at risk of long-term unemployment. These will be new jobs, with the funding conditional on the firm proving that the jobs are additional. These will be decent jobs, with a minimum of 25 hours per week paid at least the national minimum wage, and they will be good-quality jobs, with employers providing kick-starters with training and support to find a permanent job.

Advertisement

If employers meet those conditions, we will pay young people’s wages for six months, plus an amount to cover overheads. That means, for a 24-year-old the grant will be around £6,500. Employers can apply to be part of the scheme from next month, with the first kick-starters in their new jobs this autumn. I urge every employer, big or small, national or local, to hire as many kick-starters as possible. Today, I am making available an initial £2 billion, enough to fund hundreds of thousands of jobs, and I commit: there will be no cap on the number of places available.

We can do more for young people. Traineeships are a proven scheme to get young people ready for work, and we know they work, so for the first time ever we will pay employers £1,000 to take on new trainees, with triple the number of places. What is more, to help 18 to 19-year-olds leaving school or college to find work in high-demand sectors, such as engineering, construction and social care, we will provide £100 million to create more places on level 2 and 3 courses.

The evidence says that careers advice works, too, so we will fund it, with enough new careers advisers to support over a quarter of a million more people. We will also expand our universal skills offer. Sector-based work academies provide training, work placements and a guaranteed job interview in high-demand sectors, and the evidence shows they work, so we will expand them, by tripling the number of places.

We know that apprenticeships work, too, with 91% of apprentices staying in work or doing further training afterwards, so for the next six months we will pay employers to create new apprenticeships. We will pay businesses to hire young apprentices, with a new payment of £2,000 per apprentice, and introduce a brand new bonus for businesses to hire apprentices aged 25 and over, with a payment of £1,500. I thank my right hon. Friend the Education Secretary for his support and commitment in developing these measures.

Advertisement

We know that the longer someone is out of work, the harder it is for them to return. Millions of people are moving on to universal credit and need urgent support to get back to work, so we are doubling the number of work coaches in jobcentres, increasing the flexible support fund, extending the rapid response service, expanding the work and health programme, and developing a new scheme to support the long-term unemployed. The academic and economic evidence tells us these are among the most effective things we can do.

For that reason, I am investing an extra £1.2 billion in the Department for Work and Pensions to support millions of people back to work, and I am grateful for everything my right hon. Friend the Work and Pensions Secretary and her incredible team have done. I am talking about £1 billion of support for the unemployed, more money for skills, traineeships, apprenticeships, and a new, good-quality job for hundreds of thousands of new kick-starters. That is the first part of our plan for jobs.

The second part of our plan is to support job creation, and that begins with historic investment in infrastructure to create jobs in every region and nation of the UK. At the Budget, I announced £88 billion of capital funding this year, and last week the Prime Minister announced our plans to accelerate £5 billion of additional investment projects. We are doubling down on our ambition to level up, with better roads, better schools, better hospitals and better high streets, creating jobs in all four corners of the country.

As well as investing in infrastructure, we want to create green jobs. This will be a green recovery, with concern for our environment at its heart, and as part of that, I am announcing today a new £2 billion green homes grant. From September, homeowners and landlords will be able to apply for vouchers to make their homes more energy efficient and create local jobs. The grants will cover at least two thirds of the cost—up to £5,000 per household—and for low-income households we will go even further, with vouchers covering the full cost, up to £10,000.

Advertisement

On top of the £2 billion voucher scheme, I am releasing £1 billion of funding to improve the energy efficiency of public sector buildings, alongside a £50 million fund to pilot the right approach to decarbonise social housing. Taken together, we expect these measures to make more than 650,000 homes more energy efficient; to save households up to £300 a year on their bills; to cut carbon by more than half a megatonne per year—equivalent to taking 270,000 cars off the road; and, most importantly right now, to support around 140,000 green jobs. A £3 billion green jobs plan to save money, cut carbon and create jobs.

One of the most important sectors for job creation is housing. The construction sector adds £39 billion a year to the UK economy. House building alone supports nearly three quarters of a million jobs, with millions more relying on the availability of housing to find work. But property transactions fell by 50% in May. House prices have fallen for the first time in eight years and uncertainty abounds in the market—a market we need to be thriving. We need people feeling confident—confident to buy, sell, renovate, move and improve. That will drive growth. That will create jobs. So to catalyse the housing market and boost confidence, I have decided today to cut stamp duty.

Right now, there is no stamp duty on transactions below £125,000. Today, I am increasing the threshold to half a million pounds. This will be a temporary cut running until 31 March next year, and, as is always the case, these changes to stamp duty will take effect immediately. The average stamp duty bill will fall by £4,500 and nearly nine out of 10 people buying a main home this year will pay no stamp duty at all. Stamp duty cuts, a £5,000 green homes grant and tens of billions of pounds of new capital projects—we are creating jobs: the second part of our plan for jobs.

The final part of our plan will protect jobs that already exist by helping some of our highest-employing but hardest-hit sectors: hospitality and tourism. Our economy relies on consumption, especially social consumption: the pubs, cafés, restaurants, hotels and B&Bs that bring life to our villages, towns and cities. Taken together, these sectors employ over 2 million people—disproportionately younger, women and people from black, Asian and minority ethnic communities. Many rural and coastal communities rely on these industries. Some 80% of hospitality firms temporarily stopped trading in April and 1.4 million workers have been furloughed—the highest proportions of any sector. So the best jobs programme we can do is to restart these sectors and get our pubs, restaurants, cafés and B&Bs bustling again.

Advertisement

I know people are cautious about going out, but we would not have lifted the restrictions if we did not think we could do so safely. I have seen in the last few weeks how hard businesses are working to make their premises safe, and if we follow the guidance and respect what they ask us to do, we can all enjoy summer safely. In turn, we need to give these businesses the confidence to know that if they open up, invest in making their premises safe and protect jobs, demand will be there—and be there quickly. So today, I am announcing two new measures to get these sectors moving and protect jobs.

First, at the moment, VAT on hospitality and tourism is charged at 20%, so I have decided, for the next six months, to cut VAT on food, accommodation and attractions. Eat-in or hot takeaway food from restaurants, cafés and pubs; accommodation in hotels, B&Bs, campsites and caravan sites; attractions like cinemas, theme parks and zoos—all these and more will see VAT reduced, from next Wednesday until 12 January, from 20% to 5%. This is a £4 billion catalyst for the hospitality and tourism sectors, benefiting over 150,000 businesses and consumers everywhere—all helping to protect 2.4 million jobs.

But we will go further. The final measure I am announcing today has never been tried in the UK before. This moment is unique. We need to be creative. So, to get customers back into restaurants, cafés and pubs and protect the 1.8 million people who work in them, I can announce today that, for the month of August, we will give everyone in the country an eat-out-to-help-out discount. Meals eaten at any participating business, Monday to Wednesday, will be 50% off, up to a maximum discount of £10 per head for everyone, including children. Businesses will need to register and can do so through a simple website, open next Monday. Each week in August, businesses can then claim the money back, with the funds in their bank account within five working days. Some 1.8 million people work in this industry. They need our support, and with this measure, we can all eat out to help out. A VAT cut to 5% and a first-of-its-kind Government-backed discount for all—that is the third part of our plan for jobs.

A £1,000 jobs retention bonus; new, high-quality jobs for hundreds of thousands of young kick-starters; £1 billion to double the number of work coaches and support the unemployed; more apprenticeships, more traineeships and more skills funding; billions of pounds for new job creation projects across the country; a £3 billion plan to support 140,000 green jobs; and, in this vital period, as we get going again, VAT cut, stamp duty cut and meals out cut—all part of our plan for jobs worth up to £30 billion.

Advertisement

Governments, much less people, rarely get to choose the moments that define them. What choice there is comes in how we respond. For me, this has never just been a question of economics, but of values. I believe in the nobility of work. I believe in the inspiring power of opportunity. I believe in the British people’s fortitude and endurance. And it is that value, endurance, more than any other that we need to embody now—a patience to live with the uncertainty of the moment and to find that new balance between safety and normality. We will not be defined by this crisis but by our response to it. It is an unambiguous choice to make this moment meaningful for our country in a way that transcends the frustration and loss of recent months. It is a plan to turn our national recovery into millions of stories of personal renewal. It is our plan for jobs, and I commend it to this House.

(function(d, s, id){ var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0]; if (d.getElementById(id)) {return;} js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id; js.src = "https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/sdk.js"; fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs); }(document, 'script', 'facebook-jssdk'));

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Politics

‘We have to kick start the economy!’ MP defends building plans as Labour accused of ‘ignoring will of the people’

Published

on

Labour MP Matthew Pennycook has defended the Government’s new planning reforms, insisting that local communities will retain their right to object to developments.

Speaking to GB News, Pennycook emphasised that “no one is saying that the views of local communities should be ignored”.


The defence comes as part of Labour’s broader initiative to streamline planning processes for major infrastructure projects across the UK.

The Government plans to reduce the number of legal challenges allowed against major infrastructure projects from three to one for “cynical cases lodged purely to cause delay.”

Advertisement
Matthew Pennycook

Matthew Pennycook said that they are not ignoring local communities

GB News

Speaking to GB News, Pennycook said: “No one is saying that the views of local communities, local people up and down the country, should be ignored under any of the changes we’re making. People will still have a right to object to planning applications.

Advertisement

“They will keep the right to challenge the lawfulness of government decisions. What we’re saying today is that as part of our plan for change, we’ve got to kick start economic growth.

LATEST DEVELOPMENTS

“We’ve got to streamline the delivery of the critical national infrastructure that our country needs, whether that’s energy, transport or aviation projects.

“We already made a number of changes to national planning policy last year to aid with that objective. We’re making further changes to the planning and infrastructure bill we’re bringing forward in the coming months.

Advertisement

“As part of that package, what we’re saying today is that your ability to bring forward repeated judicial review permission requests shouldn’t be allowed.

“We’re going to reduce the number of those permission requests from three to two in most cases. And in cases where a judge says that this challenge has no merit whatsoever from three to one, that will get the delivery of critical national infrastructure speeded up.

Keir Starmer

Keir Starmer has vowed to defeat what he calls “blockers”

PA

Advertisement

“That will have a real world impact. Because, I’m sure your viewers put it to you repeatedly, it is just too difficult to get anything built in this country.”

The changes follow recommendations from Lord Banner KC’s review of legal challenges against major building projects.

Lord Banner said: “I saw broad consensus from claimants to scheme promoters that a quicker system of justice would be in their interests, provided that cases can still be tried fairly.”

Prime Minister Keir Starmer has vowed to defeat what he calls “blockers” who are preventing the UK from completing vital infrastructure projects.

Advertisement
Matthew Pennycook

The government plans to reduce the number of legal challenges allowed against major infrastructure project

GB News

“For too long, blockers have had the upper hand in legal challenges – using our court processes to frustrate growth,” Starmer said.

Advertisement

He added: “We’re putting an end to this challenge culture by taking on the NIMBYs and a broken system that has slowed down our progress as a nation.”

The Prime Minister described the reforms as “taking the brakes off Britain by reforming the planning system so it is pro-growth and pro-infrastructure.”

According to the government, projects that have faced significant delays include the Sizewell C nuclear plant, the A47 national highway project and new windfarms in East Anglia.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Inheritance tax raid on military families will raise ‘nothing’ for Treasury, ex-Chancellor claims

Published

on

Former Chancellor Kwasi Kwarteng has branded Labour’s plans to impose inheritance tax on military families as “total insanity”, warning the measure would raise “nothing” for the Treasury.

Speaking to GB News, Kwarteng criticised the policy that will affect death-in-service payments for Armed Forces personnel from April 2027.

FULL STORY HERE.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

State pension age row erupts as MPs launch investigation into Waspi ‘injustice’

Published

on

MPs have called for an urgent inquiry into the Labour Government’s decision not to compensate Women Against State Pension Inequality (Waspi) women impacted by historic policy decisions.

The All-Party Parliamentary Group (APPG) for State Pension Inequality for Women has urged the Work and Pensions Committee to investigate the Government’s response to a damning ombudsman report.


This request follows the government’s acceptance of maladministration in communicating pension changes to 1950s-born women, despite its refusal to provide financial compensation.

The Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman (PHSO) launched its investigation in 2018 to examine potential injustice which reportedly impacted 3.8 million older women.

Advertisement

In the investigation, the PHSO focused on whether these women suffered due to “maladministration” in how the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) communicated state pension age changes.

Do you have a money story you’d like to share? Get in touch by emailing money@gbnews.uk.

Waspi protest and Westminster

MPs have launched an inquiry into Waspi women “injustice”

Advertisement

GETTY

The probe was specifically designed to determine if the DWP’s communication methods regarding the changes to women’s state pension age were adequate.

Following the report’s findings, the government acknowledged there had been maladministration in how changes were communicated, but rejected the PHSO’s proposed remedy. The Government subsequently confirmed it would not provide any financial compensation to women born in the 1950s.

As part of its inquiry, the APPG has now asked the Work and Pensions Committee to evaluate whether the government’s decision to withhold financial redress was justified.

Advertisement

Furthermore, the parliamentary group specifically highlighted concerns about the PHSO’s statistics regarding women’s awareness of the pension changes and how official correspondence was interpreted and retained.

The PHSO investigation revealed that the DWP had provided adequate and accurate information between 1995 and 2004. However, the probe found that DWP decision-making between 2005 and 2007 resulted in a significant delay.

This delay meant there was a 28-month gap before the department began sending letters to 1950s-born women about their state pension age changes.

APPG co-chairs Rebecca Long-Bailey and Bryn Davies expressed deep concern over the Government’s stance. “As you can imagine many of those women who have suffered this injustice are simply devastated and perplexed by the Governments response,” they said.

Advertisement

The co-chairs formally requested the committee to consider “opening an inquiry or holding a one-off session into the Governments response.” The APPG has called for an investigation into what financial redress options were considered and costed by the DWP.

The group also wants to know whether additional compensation options remain available for consideration.

As well as this, parliamentary group noted that while the Work and Pensions Committee lacks legal powers to force government action, it has historically played a crucial role.

LATEST DEVELOPMENTS:

Advertisement

The committee has previously been instrumental in scrutinising government responses to PHSO reports.

As well as this, the APPG has requested that the committee publish its own response to the government’s handling of the PHSO report.

“It is gravely concerning that without such scrutiny in this instance, a precedent may be set by this case where the government rejects the PHSO’s independent review and central recommendations without further challenge and discussion,” the co-chairs stated.

The group emphasised that proper scrutiny of the government’s response to the PHSO report was essential to maintain the integrity of independent reviews.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Barrister demands change to the law as Axel Rudakubana avoids life sentence by TEN days: ‘It’s evil!’

Published

on

A UK Barrister has said the law “should be changed” on handing life sentences to those under 18, as Axel Rudakubana is set to avoid a whole life sentence for the Southport attack.

Speaking to GB News, Steven Barrett said that Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer “should have used his majority” in Parliament to change the law ahead of Rudakubana’s sentencing.


The Southport triple-killer will be sentenced today at Liverpool Crown Court – but while his crimes could warrant a whole life order, this cannot be applied as he was 17 at the time of the offences.

A minimum term will be instead set by the judge before he can be considered for release.

Advertisement
Axel Rudakubana sketch, Steven Barrett

Barrister Steven Barrett has demanded a change in the law for life sentences ahead of the decision on Axel Rudakubana’s killings

CPS / GB News

Admitting that the case is “rare” for such a law to be changed, Barrett told GB News that the Labour Government could have “taken action” to avoid Rudakubana avoiding the full hand of justice.

Advertisement

Barrett fumed: “I would have liked my country and my Prime Minister to have taken action to avoid that. But that’s where we are.

“The Prime Minister will talk about votes for 16 year olds, but the idea that they might be liable for their criminal actions, apparently there has to be a gap between that. And I think we as a country need to look at this.”

Expressing his outrage at the Southport attack and the apparent failings of the Prevent scheme which allowed Rudakubana to “slip through the net”, Barrett declared that the July 2024 killings were “evil”, and the details of the incident are “horrific”.

u200bAxel Rudakubanau200bAxel Rudakubana will be sentenced in court today for the Southport attackCPS/PA

Barrett said: “I just want to be absolutely unequivocal. This is evil. What we’re going to discover and the details that are going to come out are horrific.

Advertisement

“He didn’t just murder three beautiful, innocent children. He stabbed ten other people grotesquely, and he traumatised everybody who wasn’t stabbed.”

LATEST DEVELOPMENTS:

When pressed by host Miriam Cates on Keir Starmer’s defence of the “information vacuum” following the attack, Barrett claimed that the country “doesn’t have an honest Prime Minister”.

He stated: “I don’t believe the Prime Minister, to be honest, that claim doesn’t stack up on any level. He says he couldn’t have told us in August that it was terrorism, and then he tells us in October that it’s terrorism – he knew back then.

Advertisement

“I’m afraid the only conclusion that a rational person can draw is that we don’t have an honest Prime Minister.”

Barrett added: “In the grand scheme of things, he’s [Rudakubana] avoiding a whole life tariff because of ten days. That seems to me a technicality.”

Steven Barrett

Barrett told GB News that Prime Minister Keir Starmer is ‘dishonest’

Advertisement

GB News

Praising the “bravery” of Leanne Lucas and John Hayes, who were two adults stabbed in defence of the children in the Southport attack, Barrett called for the “heroes” to be honoured, following the sentencing.

Barrett concluded: “I think the two of them are absolute heroes, and we as a country should do something for Leanne and John. We should honour them, we should make them knights and dames.

“Rudakubana represents absolute evil, and they represent good. They are heroes in our society and we are lucky to have them.”

Advertisement

Starmer has defended his position on withholding information about the Southport killer. The Prime Minister insisted he was following “the law of the land” to prevent the case against Rudakubana from collapsing.

“You know and I know that it would not have been right to disclose those details,” Starmer told reporters. “The only losers if the details had been disclosed would be the victims and the families because it ran the risk the trial would collapse.”

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Donald Trump birthright citizenship order temporarily halted as judge labels move ‘blatantly unconstitutional’

Published

on

Donald Trump’s executive order ending birthright citizenship in the US has been blocked by a judge.

Judge John Coughenour has issued a temporary restraining order to clamp down on Donald Trump’s ban, which would have seen undocumented migrants in the US unable to register their children as American citizens.


Coughenour claimed the order was “blatantly unconstitutional”, and his intervention has seen the move halted for the next 14 days.

“I have been on the bench for over four decades. I can’t remember another case whether the question presented was as clear,” the judge said.

Advertisement
Trump

Judge John Coughenour has issued a temporary restraining order to clamp down on Donald Trump’s ban

REUTERS

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Keir Starmer ‘bending knee’ to Brussels as EU looks to undo Brexit with ‘disgraceful’ Customs Union deal

Published

on

Sir Keir Starmer has been accused of “bending the knee” to Brussels as the European Union looks to strike a customs agreement with the UK.

The Prime Minister is under pressure to return Britain to the EU’s orbit after the EU’s new trade chief Maros Sefcovic stresseed such an agreement would represent membership of the Pan-Euro-Mediterranean Convention (PEM).


PEM operates under common rules which enable parts, ingredients and materials for manufacturing supply chains to be sourced from across dozens of countries in Europe and North Africa tariff-free.

The suggestion, rejected by the previous Tory Governments, was touted during Sefcovic’s appearance at the World Economic Forum in Davos.

Advertisement
Keir Starmer

Keir Starmer

PA

The Prime Minister is unequioval about his determination to “reset” cross-Channel relations but continues to insist that this will not infringe on the UK’s decision to leave the Single Market or Customs Union.

Responding to Sefcovic’s comments, Shadow Foreign Secretary Dame Priti Patel said: “Labour’s programme of bending the knee to the EU is disgraceful.

“These latest reports that the Government might shackle us to the European Union are deeply concerning, and once again make clear that Keir Starmer and his chums are all too happy to put their ideology ahead of our national interest, no matter the cost.

Advertisement

“The Conservatives will always fight for the democratic freedoms the British public voted for, and will not stand idly by in the face of Labour’s great betrayal of our country.”

Starmer’s Government is reportedly holding consultations with business leaders over the benefits of PEM but no final decision has yet been made.

LATEST DEVELOPMENTS:

Priti Patel

Priti Patel

PA

Brexiteers have long warned that being part of a Customs Union would block the UK from signing independent Free Trade Agreements, including with the United States.

Advertisement

However, Liberal Democrat leader Sir Ed Davey is already publicly calling for an official return to the Customs Union.

Davey, who is expected to call for the UK to rejoin the EU later down the line, argued it was needed to boost Britain’s economy and its ability to deal with the incoming Donald Trump presidency from a position of strength.

Sefcovic’s suggestion, rejected by the previous Tory Governments, was touted during his appearance at the World Economic Forum in Davos.

The Brussels bureaucrat said the idea has not been “precisely formulated” by London yet and the “ball is in the UK’s court”.

Advertisement

Sefcovic also hinted at a full-scale veterinary agreement to reduce frictions on farming and food trade, an updating fisheries deal and mobility plan for under 30s.

u200bEuropean Commission vice-president Maros SefcovicEuropean Commission vice-president Maros Sefcovic PA

Sefcovic said it was hoped the scheme would “build bridges for the future for the European Union and the UK”.

“That was the idea,” he said. “[But] we’ve been a little bit surprised what kind of spin it got in the UK.

“It is not freedom of movement,” Sefcovic added. “We have been very clear what we’ve been proposing.”

Despite rejecting previous calls for a return of Freedom of Movement, Starmer could face pressure next month while attending a defence and security focused EU summit.

Advertisement

The Prime Minister is determined to “reset” cross-Channel relations but continues to insist that this will not infringe on the UK’s decision to leave the Single Market or Customs Union.

Keir Starmer

Keir Starmer

Getty Images

And No10 has since left the door open to accepting Sefcovic’s PEM offer.

A Downing Street spokesman said: “The arrangement that’s been discussed is not a customs union.

Advertisement

“Our red line has always been that we will never join a single market, freedom of movement, but we’re just not going to get ahead of those discussions.”

However, MPs have already been exerting pressure on Starmer over under 30s being engaged in a free movement arrangement.

A 10-minute rule bill, introduced by Liberal Democrat MP James McCleary, will receive a second reading on July 25.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Keir Starmer issues direct message to Southport community after Axel Rudakubana sentencing and vows action as he addresses ‘harrowing moment’

Published

on

Sir Keir Starmer has branded Axel Rudakubana’s crimes “one of the most harrowing moments in our country’s history” in a direct message to the Southport community this evening.

Speaking after Rudakubana was sentenced to a minimum term of 51 years in prison, the Prime Minister said: “The thoughts of the entire nation are with the families and everyone affected by the unimaginable horrors that unfolded in Southport.


“No words will ever be able to capture the depth of their pain.

“I want to say directly to the survivors, families and community of Southport – you are not alone. We stand with you in your grief.

Advertisement
Sir Keir Starmer

‘You are not alone. We stand with you in your grief,’ the Prime Minister said

PA

“What happened in Southport was an atrocity and as the judge has stated, this vile offender will likely never be released.

Advertisement

“After one of the most harrowing moments in our country’s history we owe it to these innocent young girls and all those affected to deliver the change that they deserve.”

Sarah Hammond, Chief Crown Prosecutor at the CPS’s Mersey-Cheshire branch, also paid tribute “to the victims and their families in this harrowing case” in a further statement on Thursday.

Calling Rudakubana’s crimes “dreadful”, Hammond said that the case “is one of the most harrowing that I, as the Chief Crown Prosecutor for this area, have ever come across”.

READ MORE AS AXEL RUDAKUBANA IS SENT DOWN:

Advertisement
Axel Rudakubana

Rudakubana was sentenced to a minimum term of 51 years in prison today

PA

“Axel Rudakubana is a murderer; utter devastation followed as he acted out a meticulously planned rampage of murder and violence,” she said.

Advertisement

“His purpose was to kill and he targeted the youngest, most vulnerable – no doubt in order to spread the greatest level of fear and outrage, which he did.

“Three days ago, he pleaded guilty to all 16 counts against him, saving the families of the victims the trauma of reliving the events of that day in a trial.

“But he has never expressed any remorse, only cowardice, in his refusal to face the families whose lives he has forever changed.

Rudakubana court sketch

Axel Rudakubana, as seen in a court sketch from his sentencing hearing on January 23

Advertisement

PA

“This has been an extremely difficult case for the whole prosecution team and police officers at Merseyside Police. They have had to work through some harrowing footage and evidence.

“I would like to thank them for their perseverance, compassion and determination to achieve justice for the victims and their families.

Advertisement

“This sentencing brings to an end this case, but the events of that day will leave a tragic legacy that will unfortunately endure for many years.”

The victims and their families “have shown tremendous dignity and composure in the face of unbelievable horror”, she added.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

DWP under scrutiny as MPs launch inquiry into Labour's Jobcentre reforms

Published

on

A new parliamentary inquiry into Jobcentre reform has been launched by the Work and Pensions Committee, examining proposals from the Government’s Get Britain Working white paper published in November 2024.

The inquiry will be the first in a series scrutinising plans to help achieve the Government’s target of an 80 per cent employment rate. Key proposals include merging the National Career Service with Jobcentre Plus and reforming how Jobcentres operate across the country.

Advertisement

As part of the committee investigation, MPs will examine the current role of Jobcentres and customer experiences with the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP), while exploring how they can better collaborate with external organisations and careers advisers to support people into employment.

The Government is expected to publish additional details about the white paper proposals later this year. There are over 600 Jobcentres operating across the UK, with significant concentrations in specific regions.

Currently, the highest density of centres can be found in the central Scotland belt, South Wales, and the North East of England. Major urban areas including Birmingham and London also host substantial numbers of Jobcentre locations.

Do you have a money story you’d like to share? Get in touch by emailing money@gbnews.uk.

Advertisement

Westminster and Jobcentre sign

These geographical concentrations mean reforms could have a particularly strong impact on Universal Credit, PIP and other benefit claimants in these regions, where higher numbers of people access Jobcentre services.

According to the white paper, Jobcentres have become “too focused on box ticking” around benefit claims, with services that are overly centralised, standardised and impersonal. The Government aims to shift focus away from benefit administration towards providing more personalised employment support.

A key objective is to transform Jobcentres into centres that prioritise skills development and career advancement. This represents a significant change from the current approach, which the white paper suggests has become too bureaucratic.

Advertisement

The reforms seek to create a more dynamic service that better serves jobseekers’ individual needs.

DWP benefits payments Christmas

Committee Chair Debbie Abrahams shared: “We know that good work has many benefits to individuals and their families, but also to the local economy and for wider economic growth.”

Abrahams warned of the consequences of worklessness, noting that “for someone of working age not in work, whether that’s through unemployment or economic inactivity, there are long-term negative impacts on health and wellbeing.”

Advertisement

Current statistics show significant challenges, with the employment rate at 74.8 per cent and economic inactivity at 21.6 per cent.

The Committee Chair emphasised the urgent need to address skills development, saying: “There is no hiding from the challenge of ensuring people have the skills they need to access and progress in work, including the jobs of the future.”

Advertisement

Addressing the proposed reforms, Abrahams questioned: “The Government plans reforms to refocus the Jobcentre by folding in the work of the careers service.

“But due to the way the Jobcentre touches people’s lives, being both an access point for benefits and employment opportunities, getting this formula for reform right, if it needs it, is essential.”

LATEST DEVELOPMENTS:

Liz Kendall

Advertisement

“But what should these reforms look like? And what would be the fairest and most effective changes that would help deliver a boost in employment, and people’s prospects?”

The Committee is now seeking wide-ranging input to help shape the reforms. “We want to hear broadly about the Jobcentre experience from customers, and from experts and careers advisors to help inform the debate on what precisely these reforms should look like,” Abrahams said.

The inquiry forms part of a broader workstream examining employment reforms and policy. A key aim is to advise the Government on best practices for Jobcentre reform.

The Committee is specifically seeking solutions that can achieve cross-party political consensus. This approach is designed to ensure any reforms implemented will have long-term stability.

Advertisement

The focus on building political agreement reflects the Committee’s commitment to creating lasting change in how Jobcentres operate.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

‘Bickering’ councillors accused of acting like ‘nasty children on school playgrounds’ in heated meeting

Published

on

A Gloucester City Council meeting descended into chaos as councillors were accused of acting like “nasty children” in a playground during what should have been a straightforward budget discussion.

The four-hour meeting at North Warehouse on January 20 was marked by “bickering, nastiness and finger-pointing from councillors,” according to scrutiny committee vice-chairman Tree Chambers-Dubus.


The Labour councillor for Moreland condemned the behaviour during the single-item budget meeting, which she said had become “ridiculous” and resembled a playground rather than a civic forum.

The meeting was intended to discuss spending proposals for the 2025/26 financial year, but quickly veered off course into unrelated topics.

Advertisement
u200bTree Chambers-Dubus

Tree Chambers-Dubus was speaking at the meeting

GCC/WikICommons

Instead of focusing on budget matters, councillors spent time debating whether the UK Government should ban the controversial herbicide, glyphosate. The meeting also became mired in accusations about councillors allegedly concealing information regarding indoor market rent issues.

Advertisement

Additional time was spent discussing how rough sleepers are counted in the city and methods for tackling graffiti.

“I thought it was a budget meeting,” Chambers-Dubus told chairman Andrew Gravells three hours into the proceedings.

“Why are we getting into nitpicking at people, pointing the finger at people, making accusations at people,” Chambers-Dubus demanded during the meeting.

LATEST DEVELOPMENTS:

Advertisement
Chairman Andrew Gravellsu200b

Chairman Andrew Gravells

GCC

She insisted the focus should have been on “how the finances translate to what our priorities should be”.

Advertisement

“We probably could have got this meeting done in a fraction of the time,” she said.

“A lot of what has been said, and the bickering, nastiness, quite frankly, is not actually going to have done anything or any good this evening other than keep people sitting here.”

“It’s ridiculous. It’s like a playground,” she concluded.

The conduct of council members has reportedly been a long-standing concern, with dozens of complaints recently submitted about councillor behaviour.

Advertisement
Labour councillor Tree Chambers-Dubus

Labour councillor Tree Chambers-Dubus

GCC

A special panel has been established to address these complaints, according to council insiders.

Advertisement

The issues came to light publicly last May when then-mayor Kathy Williams used her outgoing speech to highlight bullying within the council.

Williams pledged to campaign for changes in legislation that would require councillors to undergo Disclosure and Barring Service (DBS) checks.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Labour LOSING London to Tories and Reform as report shows 585,000 illegal migrants in capital

Published

on

Labour’s grip over London is breaking as voters desert Starmer’s party for the Tories and Reform, a shocking map has shown.

It comes after a report put the number of illegal migrants in the nation’s capital at 585,000, intensifying concerns migration is putting unsustainable strain on Britain’s public services and infrastructure.


The map, which has been generated by aggregating recent national polling weighted for recency and historic pollster accuracy, shows Labour’s heartland crumbling from the outside in.

It shows Starmer’s party losing eight seats around the edge of London to three different parties if an election was held tomorrow.

Advertisement

Hendon, Chelsea and Fulham, Chipping Barnet and Uxbridge and South Ruislip would all go Conservative, Bethnal Green and Stepney and Ilford North would fall to independents while Bexleyheath and Crayford and Dagenham and Rainham would swing right to Reform.

The map also shows Reform gaining Hornchurch and Upminster from the Tories in what would be historic ‘firsts’ for the disruptor party.

EXPLORE: Current voting intention of London constituencies

Projected electoral map of London

Projected electoral map of London. Note Reform gains in the east, Tory gains in the north west and two independent gains in Wes Streeting and Rushanara Ali’s seats.

Advertisement

GBN

Current Electoral Map of London

Current Electoral Map of London.

Advertisement

GBN

Voter frustration with uncontrolled migration has been a major driver in Labour’s dwindling fortunes in the capital.

A recent report compiled on behalf of Thames Water estimated one in 12 of the population was living in London illegally.

The report combined migration estimates from the Pew Research Center in the US, the London School of Economics, Office for National Statistics with the number of National Insurance registrations for non-EU foreign nationals over a nine-year period.

Advertisement

The analysis put the number of illegal migrants in London at a minimum of 390,355 and a maximum of 585,533, with a median figure of 487,944.

The Home Office does not have any comprehensive data on the number of people coming to the UK illegally, aside from Channel crossings.

In 2025, 1,019 have crossed the Channel is small boats so far this year, the joint fastest rate since records began in 2018.

LATEST FROM MEMBERSHIP:

Advertisement
Farage blasts Labour as Channel crossings soar as death toll reaching 55

Farage blasts Labour as Channel crossings soar

NIGEL FARAGE

Reform UK London AM, Alex Wilson said: “The news that one in 12 Londoners are illegal migrants is a truly shocking revelation. The establishment’s mass immigration experiment has ruined the fabric of our once great capital city.

“Given these numbers, it’s no shock it’s impossible to get on London’s housing ladder. It’s no shock crime is hitting record highs, year after year. It’s no shock that a rape is reported every hour in London.

“These eye watering numbers should be a wake up call for the establishment. Enough is enough, London expects better. It’s time to take back control of our capital city. Only Reform UK will save London.”

Advertisement

A Home Office spokesman said: “This Government is strengthening global partnerships and rooting out the criminal gangs who profit from small boat crossings which threaten lives.

“We have also removed 16,400 illegal migrants in just six months, the highest figure in half a decade, making it clear that those who arrive illegally will be returned.”

A Thames Water spokesman said: “Water companies have a regulatory obligation to undertake a ‘water balance’, which includes understanding how much water our customers use on a per-person basis, and how it is distributed across our supply area.

“Analysis to estimate ‘hidden and transient’ populations is carried out by an independent firm of consultants, who draw from publicly available sources including census, surveys, and published academic research. Thames Water played no part in the writing of the report and the conclusions drawn are those of the independent firm that carried out the research.”

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending