Connect with us

Politics

King’s College University scolded after splurging taxpayers’ money on ‘Far-Right extremism’ probe

Published

on

King’s College London has been criticised for “clear evidence of bias” after spending taxpayer money investigating Far-Right extremism while failing to research the Far-Left.

The university hosts the Repository of Extremist Aligned Documents (Read), which is described as a “collection of Far-Right documents for professionals working in the field of radicalisation, terrorism, and violent extremism”.


A job description for a recently advertised internship in Read, seen by GB News, says the successful applicant will focus on scrutinising extremism on the political Right, with no similar roles for investigating the actions of extremists on the other end of the spectrum.

The Read advert states the intern will source information from Far-Right forums, chat sites, Telegram channels, and websites.

Advertisement
King College London

King’s College London has been criticised for ‘clear evidence of bias’ after spending taxpayer money investigating Far-Right extremism while failing to research the Far-Left

GB News/ Getty

Critics have warned the role appears politically motivated and one-sided.

Advertisement

Conservative MP and Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philip told GB News: “This shows clear evidence of bias.
“Why would a supposedly neutral institution target only one kind of extremism?”

Philip questioned why the higher education institution appeared to be “ignoring the Far-Left”, adding: “This university has questions to answer about balance and impartiality.”

Reform UK MP Rupert Lowe said: “Sadly the educational Establishment has been undermined by a left-wing bias and what they describe as Far-Right is what most of us call normal.”

LATEST DEVELOPMENTS:

Advertisement

The International Centre for the Study of Radicalisation (ICSR) at King’s College London, which created Read, has published numerous reports on the Far-Right but does not appear to have published any research into Far-Left extremism.

Protect UK, a British Counter-Terrorism Alliance partnership, has assessed the threat from Left-Wing motivated extremism is low.

However, it points to a number of examples of terror threats in the UK and Europe in recent years which are thought to have been linked to the political Far-Left.

Europol has previously confirmed that in 2020 alone there were 24 Left-Wing or anarchist attacks in the European Union.

Advertisement

The Read advert states the intern will source information from Far-Right forums, chat sites, Telegram channels, and websites

GB News

A job description for a recently advertised internship in Read, seen by GB News, says the successful applicant will focus on scrutinising extremism on the political Right, with no similar roles for investigating the actions of extremists on the other end of the spectrum

Advertisement

GB News

In recent years there have also been two foiled Left-Wing plots in the UK, one of which resulted in a man being arrested for possessing a crossbow, bolts, a machete, and body armour in 2019.

Former immigration minister Kevin Foster slammed King’s College London for being “blindsided” by the Far-Left, warning: “It’s vital we are alive to the risks of all who seek to subvert our freedoms, whatever political cover they use for this.”

Advertisement

He added: “I hope King’s will decide they must tackle both sides of the coin when it comes to extremism, not just look at one.”

King’s College London did not respond when approached for comment by GB News.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Politics

Keir Starmer is being ‘dishonest’ about Axel Rudakubana failings, Barrister claims

Published

on

A UK Barrister has said the law “should be changed” on handing life sentences to those under 18, as Axel Rudakubana is set to avoid a whole life sentence for the Southport attack.

Speaking to GB News, Steven Barrett said that Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer “should have used his majority” in Parliament to change the law ahead of Rudakubana’s sentencing.

FULL STORY HERE.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Nigel Farage scores HUGE win as British voters put him above Starmer as best PM for the country

Published

on

Britons say Nigel Farage would be the ‘best prime minister’ in a humiliating blow to Sir Keir Starmer.

With Kemi Badenoch trailing in third place, YouGov’s voting intention poll sends the clearest signal yet that voters are disaffected with the two main parties.


YouGov’s voting intention poll, conducted for the first time since Starmer swept to power in July, asked: Which of the following do you think would make the best Prime Minister?

Nigel Farage topped the leaderboard with 20 per cent of respondents plumping for the Reform leader, with Starmer followed closely behind at 19 per cent.

Advertisement
Nigel Farage (left), Keir Starmer (right)

Reform UK has bagged a major win as Nigel Farage has been voted best prime minister

Getty Images

Badenoch and Lib Dem leader Ed Davey tussled for third place, garnering nine and eight per cent of the vote respectively.

Advertisement

In a further blow to Starmer, just half of 2024 Labour voters (50 per cent) say he would make the best prime minister from the list of four, although few (two to eight per cent) opt for an alternative, with most of the rest (34 per cent) answering “don’t know”.

Farage, by contrast, has the overwhelming support of his own voters, with 81 per cent backing him for best PM. Again, few (nought to three per cent) prefer one of the other offerings, with the rest (15 per cent) unsure.

The bad news for Starmer comes as he faces serious questions over the grooming gangs scandal and attempts to revive a sluggish economy.

Even if he manages to restore public confidence in the former, the latter will be a much more formidable challenge as Chancellor Reeves looks set to break her own fiscal rules amid rising borrowing costs and global volatility.

Advertisement

All this should be an open goal for the Conservatives but they are still trying to find their feet under Badenoch.

Farage’s message to voters, meanwhile, appears to be cutting through with voters, polling consistently suggests.

He looks set to benefit further from the political winds across the Atlantic.

LATEST MEMBERSHIP DEVELOPMENTS

Advertisement
Trump

Farage looks set to benefit further from the political winds across the Atlantic

Reuters

Farage said as much in a speech at his pre-inauguration party for the incoming president in Washington DC on Sunday, telling Republicans that he believes he will win the next election.

Farage called Trump’s 2024 victory the start of a “political tide that is going to sweep across the Western world”, adding that Americans were “lucky” to have the 45th President return to the Oval Office for another term.

The Clacton MP, who joined a number of attendees at the party hosted by Brexit-backing businessman Arron Banks and Andy Wigmore, said: “I honestly believe that what you’ve seen here is going to be a political tide that is going to sweep across the Western world.

Advertisement

“There’s much else happening across Europe too, including in the set of islands that I come from, where there is a new insurgent political party led by a maverick from the outside.

“And who knows? I actually do believe that we will win the next General Election. I do believe I can become the next Prime Minister.

“I just hope it happens quickly while Donald Trump is still in office.”

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Labour plans for inheritance tax raid on grieving military families torn apart by ex-Chancellor: ‘Total insanity!’

Published

on

Former Chancellor Kwasi Kwarteng has branded Labour’s plans to impose inheritance tax on military families as “total insanity”, warning the measure would raise “nothing” for the Treasury.

Speaking to GB News, Kwarteng criticised the policy that will affect death-in-service payments for Armed Forces personnel from April 2027.


“The fiscal benefit you get from that is tiny compared to the impact, the moral impact, the impact on people’s well-being,” the former Chancellor said.

He argued the policy targets “people whose loved ones have fought or are willing to fight to preserve the independence of our country.”

Advertisement
Kwasi Kwarteng, Rachel Reeves

Kwasi Kwarteng hit out at Labour plans to impose inheritance tax payments on grieving military families

GB News / PA

Under the new rules, children and unmarried partners of deceased service personnel will be required to pay inheritance tax on death-in-service payments if not left to a spouse or civil partner.

Advertisement

The payments, typically amounting to four times the late individual’s salary, could be reduced by up to 40 per cent in tax.

The changes will affect military personnel who die while “off duty” – such as from sudden illness or accident. Those who die “on duty” will continue to benefit from separate tax-free arrangements.

Kwarteng suggested the policy emerged “from the bowels of officialdom” and was simply rubber-stamped by ministers without proper consideration.

Rachel Reeves

The new rules will force children and unmarried partners of deceased service personnel to pay death duties on the benefit from April 2027

Advertisement

Getty

“We’re in this crazy world where the Government doesn’t have much money to provide for public services,” he said.

LATEST DEVELOPMENTS:

The former Chancellor criticised officials for scrutinising every aspect of the tax code to “wring as much money out of the public.”

Advertisement

“They’ve done this because it makes the system fairer but of course they haven’t looked at the human impact,” Kwarteng added.

He highlighted the sacrifice of those who “put their lives in real danger in the service of their country”, criticising the latest “crazy idea” of the Labour Government.

A Treasury spokesman has defended the policy, noting that existing inheritance tax protections would remain for active service deaths.

Kwasi Kwarteng

Kwarteng told GB News that the plans are ‘total insanity’ and will ‘raise nothing’ for the Treasury

Advertisement

GB News

“We value the immense sacrifice made by our brave Armed Forces, that is why existing inheritance tax exemptions will continue to apply,” the spokesman said.

The exemptions will cover deaths from wounds, accidents or diseases contracted on active service.

Advertisement

The spokesman added that any pension funds left to a spouse or civil partner in these scenarios would also remain exempt from inheritance tax.

However, Major General Neil Marshall, chief executive of the Forces Pension Society, has warned the rule change would be “corrosive” and damage trust between Armed Forces personnel and the Government.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Sir Rod Stewart’s daughter Ruby unleashes furious ‘nepo baby’ rant after backlash to anti-Donald Trump message: ‘Rich brat!’

Published

on

Sir Rod Stewart’s daughter Ruby has hit back at Americans labelling her a “nepo baby” after she shared criticisms of President Donald Trump following his inauguration.

The 37-year-old lives in the US with her family, and has been vocally opposed to Trump’s second rise to the presidency. In a recent social media rant, she responded to Trump supporters arguing she would be unknown if it weren’t for her famous father.


The model shared a post to her Instagram Story from Giffords_org, which took aim at Trump’s pro-gun laws.

It sarcastically included the headline “Office of Gun Violence Prevention,” with a message underneath reading: “404 Page Not Found” – a dig at the President’s stance on gun control.

Advertisement

The post was captioned: “Donald Trump promised gun company CEOs that he would weaken gun laws.

“He has already deleted the Office of Gun Violence Prevention’s website.

Ruby Stewart

Ruby Stewart shared some of the backlash she had received on her social media

Advertisement

Instagram

“Closing the Office of GVP would mean more guns will fall into the wrong hands and more innocent Americans will lose their lives.”

After sharing the picture, Ruby received a flood of furious responses, with many calling out her famous family status.

She shared some of the comments she’d received on her own page, with one reading: “Who the f*** do u think you are telling us what to do?!?! Aren’t u British. stfu and move.”

Advertisement

“If it wasn’t for ur dad u would be working at [McDonald’s]. Idiot,” another raged while someone else hit out: “You wouldn’t know what it was like to be poor.”

“[Your] dad sucks,” another person penned with one more writing: “Progressives causing chaos again.” (sic)

Hitting back, Ruby wrote: “My favourite is people calling me a rich brat when they voted for a nepo baby who elected billionaires into our government… right right… you sound sane.”

In a post that followed, she added: “I also want to point out that for the amount of people that left me negative comments there was 100 times more positive ones… Which gives me hope… I wanna say thank you to those people sharing their stories…

“I had wonderful conversations with strangers about how they have been affected by gun violence, prejudice and division… Times like these are the only time I really see the benefit of social media…

Advertisement

“I do not agree with everything the Biden administration has done… In fact, I think it is important to uphold all politicians to equal scrutiny…

“However… blind believe can be a dangerous thing… We deserve better.” (sic)

Ruby Stewart

Ruby Stewart hit back after being called a ‘nepo baby’

Advertisement

Getty

Mother-of-one Ruby also shared a recent post about the devastating LA wildfires, calling on people to do what they could to support the city.

She penned earlier this month: “I have no political affiliation when it comes to natural disasters and I think naturally many need to define what is happening by blaming someone in charge and I understand that need… but more importantly is what you can do now.

“At the end of the day we are here to take care of each other so please do not wait on your government officials to rebuild or take of a community.”

Advertisement

The post continued: “I cannot express enough that every dollar counts… it’s what you can afford, but there are strength in numbers… So please send this out to whoever has a heart and will do the right thing…”

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Infantilising the public over Southport has ‘undermined trust in the whole system’, Kwarteng claims

Published

on

Former chancellor Kwasi Kwarteng has accused authorities of suppressing crucial information about the Southport dance class killer, claiming they presented him as “a Welsh choir boy” to the public.

Speaking on GB News, Kwarteng said officials “clearly knew things about the killer which they suppressed” in the aftermath of the attacks.

FULL STORY HERE.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

EU negotiator Maros Sefcovic claims bloc should ‘consider’ UK joining tariff-free customs scheme

Published

on

A top Brussels bureaucrat has claimed the EU should “consider” letting the UK join a tariff-free customs scheme.

However, given Sir Keir Starmer’s red lines on the Single Market and Customs Union, the EU’s new trade chief Maros Sefcovic stresseed such an agreement would represent membership of the Pan-Euro-Mediterranean Convention (PEM).


PEM operates under common rules which enable parts, ingredients and materials for manufacturing supply chains to be sourced from across dozens of countries in Europe and North Africa tariff-free.

The suggestion, rejected by the previous Tory Governments, was touted during Sefcovic’s appearance at the World Economic Forum in Davos.

Advertisement
u200bEuropean Commission vice-president Maros SefcovicEuropean Commission vice-president Maros Sefcovic PA

Sefcovic said the idea has not been “precisely formulated” by London yet and the “ball is in the UK’s court”.

Starmer’s Government is reportedly holding consultations with business leaders over the benefits of PEM but no final decision has yet been made.

Sefcovic also hinted at a full-scale veterinary agreement to reduce frictions on farming and food trade, an updating fisheries deal and mobility plan for under 30s.

Sefcovic said it was hoped the scheme would “build bridges for the future for the European Union and the UK”.

LATEST DEVELOPMENTS:

European Union flags flying outside the European Commission in Brussels

European Union flags flying outside the European Commission in Brussels

Advertisement

PA Media

“That was the idea,” he said. “[But] we’ve been a little bit surprised what kind of spin it got in the UK.

“It is not freedom of movement,” Sefcovic added. “We have been very clear what we’ve been proposing.”

Despite rejecting previous calls for a return of Freedom of Movement, Starmer could face pressure next month while attending a defence and security focused EU summit.

The Prime Minister is determined to “reset” cross-Channel relations but continues to insist that this will not infringe on the UK’s decision to leave the Single Market or Customs Union.

Advertisement
Keir StarmerKeir StarmerPA

Housing Minister Matthew Pennycook dealt Sefcovic an almost immediate blow this morning.

Speaking to the BBC, Pennycook said: “We’re not seeking to participate in that particular arrangement.

“I think in general the Government’s been very clear … we do want a closer relationship with our European partners, both in trading terms, but also, importantly … in terms of security and defense cooperation, where we need to work far more closely. So absolutely, yes, we do want a closer relationship.

“As for this particular arrangement though we’re not seeking to participate in it at the present time.”

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Keir Starmer pledges to ‘take on Nimbys’ in bid to slash red tape on Britain’s growth

Published

on

Sir Keir Starmer has vowed to challenge opponents of major infrastructure projects after declaring Labour is “backing the builders, not the blockers”.

The Prime Minister said he would bring an end to “challenge culture” and pledged to take on so-called “nimbys”.


Downing Street said it hoped it would bring an end to “cynical” or “hopeless” cases causing delays and increasing the cost of infrastructure projects.

The Government claims more than 58 per cent of all decisions on “major infrastructure” get taken to court as it commits to making 150 major infrastructure project decisions by the next election.

Advertisement
Starmer has vowed to take on 'nimbys' in a blistering attack

Starmer has vowed to take on ‘nimbys’ in a blistering attack

PA

Opponents currently have three opportunities to secure permission for a judicial review against a major infrastructure project, firstly by writing to the High Court, then in an oral hearing and finally by asking the Court of Appeal.

Advertisement

But under plans announced by Downing Street, the written stage will be scrapped and any cases deemed “totally without merit” will be unable to ask the Court of Appeal to reconsider.

The Prime Minister said: “For too long, blockers have had the upper hand in legal challenges – using our court processes to frustrate growth. We’re putting an end to this challenge culture by taking on the Nimbys and a broken system that has slowed down our progress as a nation.

“This is the Government’s Plan for Change in action – taking the brakes off Britain by reforming the planning system so it is pro-growth and pro-infrastructure.”

LATEST DEVELOPMENTS

Advertisement
u200bSizewell was approved despite 16 months of campaigning

Sizewell was approved despite 16 months of campaigning

PA

According to the Government, more than half of decisions on nationally significant infrastructure projects were taken to court, causing an average delay of 18 months and adding millions to costs.

Advertisement

Officials pointed to cases including the approval of Sizewell C, in Suffolk, where campaigners spent 16 months seeking permission for a judicial review despite their case being described as “unarguable” at every stage.

However, only some of the grounds in the Sizewell C case were deemed “totally without merit”, meaning the remaining grounds could still have been reconsidered by the Court of Appeal.

Shadow Housing Secretary Kevin Hollinrake said: “While we welcome the Government taking forward Conservative initiatives to streamline the planning system, Labour’s blocking of our efforts to cut EU legacy red tape, such as nutrient neutrality, so they can align more closely with the European Union will hold Britain back.”

Kevin Hollinrake

Minister Kevin Hollinrake

Advertisement

Getty

The Prime Minister also pledged to “bring back common sense” to building new projects.

Writing for The Daily Mail, Starmer said: “Cases that are unarguable and unwinnable can be brought back to the courts three times.

“That causes years of delay. It costs hundreds of millions of pounds. It clogs up the courts. And strangles growth.

“The entire country pays the price. Bringing back common sense to building is the least this country deserves. Because if we want growth, we need the infrastructure to support it.”

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Angela Rayner under-fire after dismissing Southport Axel Rudakubana terror connection as Nigel Farage demands apology over ‘fake news’ accusation

Published

on

Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner has come under-fire after previously dismissing claims that Axel Rudakubana’s Southport attack was terror-related.

Reform UK leader Nigel Farage yesterday demanded an apology from Rayner after she also accused him of spreading “fake news” about the perpetrator.


Rudakubana, now 18, pleaded guilty on Tuesday to murdering Alice da Silva Aguiar, aged nine, Bebe King, six, and Elsie Dot Stancombe, seven, at a Taylor Swift-themed dance class.

He was referred to the Government’s anti-extremism scheme Prevent three times before his attack in late July, with police later finding an al-Qaeda training manual alongside ricin.

Advertisement

Following Rudakubana’s guilty plea, Sir Keir Starmer revealed that police and politicians knew about the terrorist connection shortly after the killings.

Speaking about Farage at the time of the attack, Rayner said: “He must understand that you have a level of responsibility, you’re a community leader, you’re elected to represent your constituency and therefore you have a level of responsibility with that, and it’s not to stoke up what conspiracy theories or what you think might have happened, or lean into what you think.

“There’s a responsibility to say the police are doing a difficult job, local authorities, all of the services that are on the ground.

“We want to establish facts as soon as possible and we have a responsibility to hold the community together and say, let’s get the facts and then let’s look at what the actual solutions are and what we can do about the horrific situation that we find ourselves in, not to stir up these fake news online.”

Advertisement

Responding to Rayner’s previous comments last night, the Reform UK leader told The Telegraph: “Many public figures, including Angela Rayner, made derogatory and inciteful remarks about my comments in the vacuum that followed the terrorist attack in Southport.

“I was right all along. This man was known to the authorities and the truth was withheld. As the independent reviewer of terrorism legislation Jonathan Hall KC confirmed, the public should have been told the truth without damaging the trial. This is an appalling cover-up and I deserve apologies.”

Home Office Minister Jess Phillips separately described Farage as a “grifter”, while Liverpool Riverside MP Kim Johnson argued the Reform UK leader was the “voice of the EDL”.

However, non-Labour politicians also accused Farage of stoking tensions during the subsequent summer riots, including ex-Security Minister Tom Tugendhat.

Advertisement

FOLLOW BELOW FOR LIVE UPDATES THROUGHOUT THE DAY…

Rayner braces for Cabinet clash after vowing to make economic growth ‘trump’ Net Zero plans

Rachel Reeves

Rachel Reeves

PA

Advertisement

Chancellor Rachel Reeves has been preparing for a Cabinet clash over potential backing for an expansion at Heathrow Airport.

Speaking at Heathrow Airport, Reeves said: “There was always somebody that said, ‘Oh, yes, of course, we want to grow the economy but we don’t like that investment.’

“Or, ‘We don’t like that wind farm, we don’t like those pylons, we don’t like that airport’.”

She added: “When we say growth is the number one mission of this Government we mean it — and that means it trumps other things.”

Advertisement

Sir Keir Starmer was yesterday unable to set out his position on a potential Heathrow expansion, despite previously opposing the move.

However, Net Zero Secretary Ed Miliband, Environment Secretary Steve Reed and London Mayor Sadiq Khan have all voiced opposition to an expansion.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

POLL OF THE DAY: As the economy struggles

Published

on

UK public borrowing surged to £17.8billion in December, marking the highest December borrowing in four years.

The figure came in 25 per cent above economist predictions, according to data released by the Office for National Statistics (ONS).


The unexpected increase in borrowing costs has raised concerns about the state of public finances, despite Chancellor Rachel Reeves maintaining confidence in the country’s financial health following the October budget.

The significant rise was primarily attributed to high debt interest costs and a one-off military housing purchase. The December borrowing figure represents a £10.1billion increase compared to the same period last year.

Advertisement

Economists had forecast public sector net borrowing would reach £14.1billion for the month.

The market pressures come amid recent financial turbulence, with the pound falling to a nine-month low against the dollar two weeks ago. UK 10-year borrowing costs have climbed above 4.8 percent.

The yield on 30-year gilts has reached 5.36 percent, its highest level since 1998.

The Chancellor’s £9.9billion fiscal headroom is at risk of being completely erased, according to economic experts.

Advertisement

With that in mind, as the economy struggles – Should Rachel Reeves prioritise reducing debt or economic growth? Vote in our poll and have your say by commenting below.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

ABC The View ‘hypocrisy’ row explodes as panel defends Biden pardons while Trump’s branded ‘spineless’

Published

on

The hosts of ABC’s The View have sparked outrage and claims of “hypocrisy” as they discussed the recent pardons issued by President Donald Trump and former President Joe Biden.

Tuesday’s episode of the US talk show was hosted by comedian Joy Behar, 82, lawyer Sunny Hostin, 56, journalist Sara Haines, 47, political strategist Alyssa Farah Griffin, 35 and TV personality Ana Navarro, 53.


The segment was prompted by President Trump’s move to pardon some 1,500 January 6 rioters as part of a flurry of executive orders signed immediately as he retook office.

Trump gave a “full pardon” to those jailed following the violent disorder in the last days of his first presidency, who he described as “hostages” of the previous administration.

Advertisement

As he signed the order, the president raised a complaint about former President Biden’s choice to issue blanket pre-emptive pardons for his family and members of the January 6 committee, including Dr Anthony Fauci and General Mark Milley, who had been investigating Trump.

“I was surprised that President Biden would go and pardon his whole family because that makes him look very guilty… and how about this J6 committee, why is he pardoning them? They were guilty as hell, they rigged it. It was a rigged deal,” he said to journalists.

President Donald Trump

Trump pardoned 1500 January 6 rioters amid a flurry of executive orders

Advertisement

Getty

“So, in Trump’s world the lawmakers trying to save democracy are ‘thugs’ and the lawbreakers are ‘hostages,” Behar said incredulously as she opened the floor to debate.

Also picking up on Trump’s use of the term hostages, Haines called the move “the biggest middle finger he could give the entire country out of all of his options.”

Alyssa Farah Griffin, who had worked as a communications director in Trump’s previous administration, slammed his pardons as “dangerous and reckless.”

Advertisement

While she praised Biden’s pardoning of Fauci and Milley, Griffin attempted to provide balance as she criticised Biden’s decision to extend the immunity to his family, saying his choices “floored her”.

Joy Behar

Behar and her panel pulled no punches in criticising Trump

ABC

Advertisement

She explained it set a “dangerous precedent” for futurepresidents to abuse, adding: “I think it was disgraceful, and it’ll harm his legacy.”

The comment set the studio alight, with a volcanic Navarro furiously hitting back and defending the Democrat by arguing: “I think comparing Biden’s pardons to Trump’s is like comparing apples to Volkswagens.”

The audience clapped and cheered as she blasted Republicans who were not objecting to Trump’s pardons as having “absolutely no spine.”

“Nobody who stood up and condemned that and is today silent after those pardons should be able to look at themselves in the mirror because you have no morals,” she slammed.

Advertisement

Defending Biden, she added: “Joe Biden’s family and the people he pardoned have not actually committed any crimes. He is trying to prevent them spending the rest of their lives fighting the government.”

While not part of the most recent moves, the former president did issue an unconditional pardon to his son Hunter, who had pleaded guilty to tax charges in September 2023 – despite previously pledging not to.

Nevertheless, Hostin agreed, stating that she “was not offended by Biden pardoning his family.”

“We’ve already had a Trump presidency, we know this administration will be a vengeful one, we know this is a vengeful man.

Advertisement

“If I could protect me and mine, I would do that. SoI think we need to Joe Biden some grace,” she declared.

On Trump’s pardons, she said furiously: “He ran on this, ‘I’m going to be a law-and-order president,’ which a lot of the Republican Party runs on, so I think it’s really disgraceful that he would do that.”

LATEST DEVELOPMENTS:

Ana Navarro

The View panel were slammed as ‘”hypocrites” online for their comments

Advertisement

ABC

The debate sparked a huge response online, with some branding The View panel as “hypocrites” and “disgusting” after the majority defended Biden’s pardons while dismantling Trump’s.

“And here we have it: these women praise Biden for pardoning his family… and in return, condemn Trump for doing the same f*****g thing by pardoning the January 6th rioters. These women are f*****g insane. #TheView,” one slammed.

Advertisement

Another raged: “The same day Biden pardoned his entire family and the j6 committee. Something he said he wouldn’t do. Actually STFU,”

“This show is a boatload full of angry, disgruntled, downright mean women who hate love,” a third wrote disparagingly.

“This is absolutely DISGUSTING!!!” a fourth wrote in response to the clip while another simply raged: “Such hypocrisy.” (sic)

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025 WordupNews