Connect with us

NewsBeat

Southport killer Axel Rudakubana researched car bombs, detonators and nitric acid amid fixation with violence

Published

on

Axel Rudakubana: Southport killer ‘tried to take a taxi to school that expelled him’ week before dance class atrocity

Southport killer Axel Rudakubana is understood to have researched car bombs, detonators and nitric acid as his fascination with violence flourished unchecked online.

Searches of his devices have revealed an obsession with massacres, torture and a wide range of brutal conflicts, including the genocide in Rwanda, where his parents are from.

Written material discovered by police after his knife rampage, which saw three girls murdered, also reportedly included documents on Nazi Germany, clan cleansing in Somalia, an uprising in Kenya and a treatise on combat in Chechnya.

The 18-year-old is also believed to have had a cache of weapons stashed at his home, including a machete, scabbard, arrows, castor beans and a 20cm kitchen knife identical to one used in the rampage.

Advertisement
Axel Rudakubana, 18, is understood to have researched car bombs, detonators and nitric acid leading up to the Southport attack

Axel Rudakubana, 18, is understood to have researched car bombs, detonators and nitric acid leading up to the Southport attack (PA Media)

Before he left in a taxi to launch his attack on unsuspecting children at a Taylor Swift-themed dance class in Merseyside on 29 July last year, it is understood he searched social media for the Mar Mari Emmanuel stabbing, when a bishop and five others were attacked in a Sydney church in April 2024.

Officers also discovered a Tupperware container under his bed containing an unknown substance, which was later found to be homemade biological toxin ricin.

One PDF file entitled “Military Studies In The Jihad Against The Tyrants, The Al Qaeda Training Manual” resulted in him being charged with a terror offence.

Advertisement

Although the documents show a clear fascination with extreme violence, the attack has not been classed as terrorism because police can find no evidence he subscribed to any particular ideology or religion.

Details of his fixation emerged after the prime minister, who has announced a public inquiry into the atrocity, warned Britain is facing a new threat from “young men in their bedrooms” accessing radical materials online.

From left to right: Bebe King, six; Elsie Dot Stancombe, seven; and Alice da Silva Aguiar, nine; died following the attack

From left to right: Bebe King, six; Elsie Dot Stancombe, seven; and Alice da Silva Aguiar, nine; died following the attack (PA Media)

Laying the groundwork for an overhaul of terrorism laws to guard against the new threat of “loners and misfits” driven to acts of extreme violence, Sir Keir Starmer said: “Terrorism has changed. In the past, the predominant threat was highly organised groups with clear political intent. Groups like al-Qaeda.

Advertisement

“That threat of course remains. But now, alongside that we also see acts of extreme violence perpetrated by loners, misfits, young men in their bedroom, accessing all manner of material online, desperate for notoriety.”

However security experts have warned against expanding terror laws to encompass atrocities carried out by lone attackers.

Neil Basu, a former national head of counter-terrorism, told LBC it would be a “mistake” to label something as “terrorism if it is not terrorism”, as this could lead some to seek out a “day of infamy”.

He added: “I would be wary of expanding terrorism law to cover lone actors… that isn’t what terrorism law is about, but it would be for politicians to debate whether the law needs to be expanded.”

Advertisement
Prime minister Sir Keir Starmer announced a public inquiry into the atrocity on Tuesday

Prime minister Sir Keir Starmer announced a public inquiry into the atrocity on Tuesday (PA Wire)

Ian Acheson, a former prison governor and senior Home Office official, meanwhile told The Times newspaper that people “who are mobilised by hatred and contempt for others into committing lone wolf attacks” have been “with us for years”.

The government has also promised to crack down on online retailers after it emerged the then 17-year-old Rudakubana purchased his weapon on Amazon.

Home secretary Yvette Cooper told MPs it is a “total disgrace” that Rudakubana, who had admitted to carrying a knife ten times, was able to buy a weapon online and promised new measures in the Crime and Policing Bill this spring.

Advertisement

Writing in The Sun, Sir Keir said: “It remains shockingly easy for our children to get their hands on deadly knives. The lessons of this case could not be clearer.

“Time and again, as a child, the Southport murderer carried knives. Time and again, he showed clear intent to use them.

“And yet, tragically, he was still able to order the murder weapon off of the internet without any checks or barriers. A two-click killer. This cannot continue.”

Rudakubana pleaded guilty on Monday to 16 offences, including three counts of murder, ten of attempted murder, producing the deadly poison ricin and possession of a document which contained al-Qaeda training material.

Advertisement

Alice da Silva Aguiar, nine; Bebe King, six; and Elsie Dot Stancombe, seven; died following the attack at the dance class in The Hart Space.

He is due to be sentenced at Liverpool Crown Court on Thursday.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Politics

Joe Biden has ‘no base and no defenders’, Victor Davis Hanson claims

Published

on

US historian Victor Davis Hanson has described Joe Biden’s departure from the presidency as that of a “solitary figure” with no defenders remaining, even within his own party.

Speaking to GBN America, Hanson painted a stark picture of Biden’s final moments in office, contrasting his exit with that of his successor Donald Trump.

FULL STORY HERE.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

NewsBeat

‘Lovely and bright’ boy, 12, killed in Birmingham Hall Green stabbing named

Published

on

‘Lovely and bright’ boy, 12, killed in Birmingham Hall Green stabbing named

The family of a schoolboy killed on his walk home from school have paid tribute to the “funny, sweet” boy who had “not one aggressive bone in his body”.

Leo Ross, 12, suffered a fatal knife wound to his stomach at Trittiford Mil Park near Scribers Lane, Hall Green, shortly after 3pm on Tuesday, West Midlands Police said.

A 14-year-old boy has been arrested on suspicion of his murder.

Police search the country park

Advertisement
Police search the country park (Jacob King/PA Wire)

Leo was taken to hospital but died from his injuries, according to the force, which described it as a “chaotic and traumatic” scene.

In a written statement issued to BBC News, a member of the victim’s family described Leo as “the most beautiful, kind child”, and “the nicest kid you would meet”.

The family member added that the boy was “funny, sweet and had not one aggressive bone in his body”, and had been walking a ten-minute route home.

Leo was a pupil at Christ Church C of E Secondary Academy. Executive headteacher Diane Henson described his death as a tragedy.

Advertisement
Officers sweep the woodland for clues

Officers sweep the woodland for clues (Jacob King/PA Wire)

She said: “Leo was a lively and happy young man. He had many very good friends who he absolutely adored, and they adored him. He was just a lovely and bright member of the school community.

“We’re supporting the children at school and are opening a book of condolence with the family’s permission. Are thoughts are with Leo’s family and all his friends today.”

The mother of a boy in the same form as the Leo visited a gate to the country park, near the River Cole, to place flowers at the police cordon.

Advertisement

She said: “He was a gentle, really kind-hearted boy that was never horrible to anyone. That was my son’s words. He said he didn’t have a bad bone in his body.”

She said of the stabbing and the victim’s age: “It’s shocking – it’s a horrible world. I worry for my son. He’s really upset and distressed and he’s scared. Him and his friends used to hang around here.”

“It’s affected all of them,” she added. “It’s just horrible and it’s hard to believe. My son said the boy was proper gentle, just walking home.”

The 14-year-old suspect is also accused of an assault on an 80-year-old woman in the same area on Sunday, the Chief Superintendent Richard North said.

Advertisement

He added: “This is an appalling and senseless attack.

“We are doing everything we can to support the loved ones of the young boy who lost his life in such an appalling way, but we know that nothing we say or do will diminish their agony.

“Parents around the country will hear this news and be unable to comprehend the pain they must be feeling.

“Our hearts go out to the young boy’s family today. We will be carrying out reassurance patrols locally and if any of the community have any information or concerns, we would urge them to come forward.

Advertisement
Tributes left in Hall Green

Tributes left in Hall Green (Matthew Cooper/PA Wire)

Dozens of school friends of the 12-year-old victim visited the entrance to Birmingham’s The Shire Country Park to lay floral and other tributes in his memory.

The friends, whose messages named the victim as Leo Ross, also placed candles on the ground spelling out his first name.

A hand-written note attached to one tribute read: “RIP Leo Ross. We will miss you loads. Our lives won’t be the same without you.

Advertisement

“You will always be the kindest. Fly High Leo. You never deserved this ever.”

Another tribute read: “Fly high Leo. You will be deeply missed. We will keep you in our thoughts and prayers.”

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Birmingham tribute to ‘adored’ boy, 12, killed in stabbing

Published

on

Birmingham tribute to 'adored' boy, 12, killed in stabbing
West Midlands Police Leo looking straight at the camera. Ten-pin bowling is behind him with an alley leading to a set of pinsWest Midlands Police

His head teacher paid tribute to the “lovely and bright” youngster

Tributes have been paid to a 12-year-old boy stabbed to death in Birmingham who has been named as Leo Ross by police.

The West Midlands force said he was stabbed in the stomach and found near Scribers Lane in Hall Green at about 15:40 GMT on Tuesday and died in hospital later.

Leo, a pupil at Christ Church C of E Secondary Academy, was a “lively and happy young man” and “had many very good friends”, executive head teacher Diane Henson said.

A 14-year-old boy was earlier arrested on suspicion of murder. Police said the teenager had also been arrested in connection with an unrelated assault on a woman in her 80s on 19 January.

Advertisement

Ms Henson said Leo was “just a lovely and bright member of the school community”.

“We’re supporting the children at school and are opening a book of condolence with the family’s permission,” she added.

The executive head teacher stated the boy had many good friends “who he absolutely adored and they adored him”.

The family said he had been walking a 10-minute route home when the attack happened and described him as “funny, sweet and had not one aggressive bone in his body”.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Bus driver killer loses appeal against four-year sentence

Published

on


A teenage boy who killed a bus driver in an attack that saw him headbutting and “raining punches” on to his victim has lost an appeal against his sentence.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

SAS veteran blasts ‘imbecilic’ Rachel Reeves as Labour target war heroes with inheritance tax raid: ‘I am absolutely fuming!’

Published

on

An SAS veteran has hit out at Labour’s decision to hit grieving families of military workers with inheritance tax from April 2027.

The money given to families of deceased Armed Forces members, called death in service payments, may be subject to a hefty cut after Labour MPs voted in favour of a raid.


The lump sum of money will be subject to death duties from 2027 for children or partners of servicemen and women who are not married.

Death in service payments are normally a one-off figure issued to named beneficiaries of a military worker who dies while on duty.

Advertisement
Matthew Hellyer and Rachel Reeves

Matthew Hellyer erupted into a furious rant on GB News

GB NEWS

Speaking on GB News, Matthew Hellyer erupted into a furious rant as he spoke to Martin Daubney.

Advertisement

“I am absolutely fuming. As a grieving father, my son died 18 months ago”, he said.

LATEST DEVELOPMENTS

Rachel Reeves

Rachel Reeves backed the controversial tax

PA

“I know the pain that these people are going through now. This imbecilic Government are now taxing the very people that have given us our freedom.

Advertisement

“They are ruining us. This applies to the children and widows of soldiers that have been killed on the battlefield.

“They get a final payment. They get the money, a death in service payment. This has always been seen as tax free. Something to lift the spirits and give the soldiers’ families something to look forward to because they don’t have a husband or wife to support them anymore.

“They need this money more than anything. The pain they are going through is immense.

Hellyer joined Martin Daubney on GB News

Hellyer joined Martin Daubney on GB News

Advertisement

GB NEWS

“Keir Starmer and Rachel Reeves have no compassion. They’re killing our pensioners, ridiculing our pensioners and persecuting our soldiers.

“Where does it end?”

Advertisement

He added: “This Government is waging war on our military. We have an attorney general that supported the IRA and is refusing to stand down.

“They are after our military, lock stock and two smoking barrels. They’re never giving up. It’s relentless and we’re getting beaten. We have to stand up for our rights.”

The payments will now go into probate if not left to a spouse or civil partner, potentially reducing the compensation by up to 40 per cent in inheritance tax.

Major General Neil Marshall, chief executive of the Forces Pension Society, has written to HMRC urging them to reverse the decision.

Advertisement

In his letter, he warned: “Given the high-risk nature of military service… a policy that discriminates against those who are not married or in a civil partnership poses a serious threat to morale, team cohesion and ultimately operational effectiveness.”

The Treasury has confirmed existing exemptions will continue for active service deaths.

“If a member of the Armed Forces dies from a wound inflicted, accident occurring or disease contracted on active service, they will be exempt,” a Treasury spokesman said.

Military personnel cannot avoid this tax through trusts, as the payments are part of the Armed Forces pension scheme.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Has Prince Harry really won his tabloid battle?

Published

on

Has Prince Harry really won his tabloid battle?
Sean Coughlan

Royal correspondent

Reuters Prince Harry, head and shoulders picture, taken in New York in Sept 2024Reuters

Has Prince Harry achieved “accountability” with his settlement?

The settlement between Prince Harry and News Group Newspapers is a dramatic, high stakes, turnaround. But it’s courtroom drama without the court.

Prince Harry’s team hailed the deal that stopped the trial as a “monumental victory”, receiving an undisclosed amount of “substantial damages” and an “unequivocal apology”.

Advertisement

They say he’s been vindicated – but will there also, deep down, be some mixed feelings. Was this really “slaying dragons” of the tabloid press, as he’d celebrated after a previous win when he’d given evidence in court against Mirror Group Newspapers?

While on the other side of the scrapped case, NGN says the agreement “draws a line under the past” and they reject the claims that would have been made in court about a corporate cover-up.

When NGN has spent £1bn on previous claims, they might think any extra spent on staying out of court was a win for them too.

PA Media Princess Diana in a photo rfom 1996PA Media

The apology for Princess Diana would have been very important for Prince Harry

Why did Prince Harry strike a deal now?

Advertisement

It seems a change from Prince Harry being adamant that this was about “accountability”.

“The goal is accountability. It’s really that simple,” Prince Harry told a media event in New York last month, about why he was taking on the Murdoch press.

“The scale of the cover up is so large that people need to see it for themselves,” he said.

He was fully aware of the financial risks built into such civil disputes, but seemed determined to press on, not just for himself but for 1,300 claimants who he said had settled but had “no justice”.

Advertisement
Reuters Lawyer David Sherborne read a statement outside court where the case would have been heldReuters

Lawyer David Sherborne read a statement outside court where the case would have been held

“Accountability” was mentioned again in a statement read out on behalf of Prince Harry and his co-claimant Lord Watson.

“The time for accountability has arrived,” but it meant in terms of calling on Parliament and the police to pursue what they called the “unlawful activity now finally admitted” and “the perjury and cover ups along the way”.

There was a similar call for a follow-up when Prince Harry won against the Mirror group newspapers, but there has been no imminent sign of action.

Perhaps it shouldn’t have been a surprise that there was a deal.

Advertisement

There has always been immense pressure for a settlement, because the curve of civil law bends so strongly in that direction.

Even if a claimant wins a case, they could end up paying the costs of their opponents, if the damages award is less than they have been offered.

The legal costs and damages at stake in this case could have been £10m. That’s a big poker hand decision for anyone. Plus the unknown jeopardy of what might happen in the court case and what questions Harry might have faced on the witness stand. He might have had his case ruled out of time or had his claims rejected.

The psychological cards would all have been stacked towards doing a deal. Does everyone have a price? Even when they’re seen as the last man standing?

Advertisement

In terms of the amount of damages paid to Prince Harry, or what he might do with the money, that hasn’t been made public.

But what Prince Harry’s team have seized upon is the skyscraper scale of the apology – seeing it as a “collapse” of the NGN’s denials.

They might argue that even if he had fought the court battle and won, there wouldn’t be any more to be gained.

This has always been a very personal battle for Prince Harry, the battle with the tabloids touching on his childhood as well as his adult life. So it’s significant that the apology includes an admission of a “serious intrusion” into the “private life of Diana, Princess of Wales”.

Advertisement

That could mean more to him than any financial deal.

EPA Media gathered outside the court to hear David Sherborne reading out a statementEPA

Media gathered outside the court to hear details of the agreement

Prince Harry’s team also repeated the claim that “the Sun, the flagship title for Rupert Murdoch’s UK media empire, has indeed engaged in illegal practices”.

This references the apology’s mention of “unlawful activities carried out by private investigators working for the Sun”.

NGN’s statement emphasises that this applies to the activities of external private investigators, “not by journalists” on the Sun.

Advertisement

But it narrows some of the fastidious distancing that there’s between what had happened at the shut down News of the World and the Sun.

While the statement from Prince Harry’s team lambasts those presiding over a “toxic culture” in parts of the media, past and present, and repeats its claim about a corporate cover-up, these are attack lines from a court case that will now never happen.

NGN rejects the claims of a cover-up and the destruction of evidence. But the overall tone of the response is relief at the end of arguments over old battles, and that this now draws a line under all these disputes over front pages from decades ago.

“Indeed the judge made it clear in remarks in court at the end of the hearing that these cases are likely to be the last liable to go to trial,” said NGN.

Advertisement

The bombshell case that was going to see Prince Harry giving evidence against his tabloid tormentors is over before it began. Who, in the end, will be more pleased about that?

Source link

Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Man jailed after downloading 3D printing gun instructions

Published

on


The first Islamist extremist to be found with plans for 3D-printed firearms has been jailed for seven years after using a far-right internet channel to download the instructions.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Elon Musk pours cold water over Trump’s $500bn ‘Stargate’ plan with cheeky jab

Published

on

Elon Musk has poured cold water on Donald Trump‘s half-a-trillion-dollar Artificial Intelligence initiative – marking a potential first rift between the pair since Trump took office.

The President declared on Tuesday that several tech giants including Oracle, MGX and OpenAI would be pledging $500billion (£406billion) to fund the construction of data centres in the US over his four-year term.


He said that the project, called Stargate, would be “the largest AI infrastructure project by far in history”, adding: “It’s big money and high-quality people.”

Trump said the mega funding drive would be “a resounding declaration of confidence in America’s potential”, but now, tech tycoon Musk – himself a major player in AI – has warned that the investment may not be all it seems.

Advertisement
Elon Musk

Elon Musk has poured cold water on Donald Trump’s half-a-trillion-dollar Artificial Intelligence initiative Stargate

REUTERS

An OpenAI press release had talked up its funding for Stargate, including an initial investment of $100billion.

Advertisement

But Musk prodded: “They don’t actually have the money.”

And in a swipe at Japanese partner investors SoftBank, he said he “has it on good authority” that the firm “has well under $10B secured”.

Musk has endured a long-standing feud with Sam Altman, with whom he jointly founded OpenAI, the firm behind Artificial Intelligence behemoth ChatGPT.

LATEST ON DONALD TRUMP‘S SECOND TERM:

Advertisement
Donald Trump

Trump has said the mega funding drive would be ‘a resounding declaration of confidence in America’s potential’

REUTERS

Musk, who resigned from OpenAI in 2018, has since labelled his former colleague Altman “Swindly Sam”.

Advertisement

Meanwhile, Altman has called Musk a “bully” in response.

In the face of the X owner’s condemnation, construction on one of Stargate data centres has already begun in Texas, according to Oracle Chairman Larry Ellison, who launched the project in the White House to alongside Trump, Altman and SoftBank CEO Masayoshi Son.

“We wouldn’t be able to do this without you, Mr President,” Altman said.

Elon Musk

Though Musk and Trump appear to be at loggerheads over AI, the Tesla owner has been vocal in his support for the President on cracking down on DEI

Advertisement

REUTERS

Though Musk and Trump appear to be at loggerheads over AI, the Tesla owner has been vocal in his support for the President on cracking down on Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI) initiatives.

Reacting to the news that Trump had signed an executive order repealing Lyndon Johnson’s establishment of affirmative action, Musk said simply: “Massive”.

Advertisement

Musk, who now leads the new administration’s drive to cut costs across the federal government, took a swipe at DEI initiatives on social media in a reply to the news of Coast Guard chief Linda Fagan’s termination.

“Undermining the US military and border security to spend money on racist/sexist DEI nonsense is no longer acceptable,” Musk said.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Trump to meet with Republican key to tax negotiations

Published

on

Rep. Mike Lawler (R-N.Y.), a leader in the effort to lift the limit on a state and local tax deduction some key House Republicans are demanding, said at a POLITICO Playbook event on Wednesday morning that he will be meeting with President Donald Trump on Wednesday.

New York, New Jersey and California Republicans made a pilgrimage to Mar-a-Lago recently to reiterate their demands to lift the so-called SALT cap, which limits the deduction to $10,000, in negotiations over a large tax bill. The lawmakers say the cap is harming constituents in their politically competitive, high-tax districts.

Their votes will be crucial to passing a major tax bill GOP lawmakers are assembling.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni at odds over It Ends With Us outtakes

Published

on

Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni at odds over It Ends With Us outtakes
Ian Youngs

Culture reporter

Sony Pictures/Everett/Shutterstock Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni facing each other in the slow dance scene from It Ends With UsSony Pictures/Everett/Shutterstock

Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni’s accounts of the slow dance scene differ

Actor and director Justin Baldoni has released out-takes from a romantic scene in his film It Ends With Us, which he says is evidence that his co-star Blake Lively’s allegations of sexual harassment are unfounded.

However, she has responded by saying the footage of the pair filming a slow dance is “damning” and corroborates her claims.

Advertisement

The two stars played a couple in the hit film, which came out last year, but have since become embroiled in an increasingly bitter legal battle.

Lively, 37, sued Baldoni, 40, in December, accusing him of engaging in “inappropriate and unwelcome behaviour” and a smear campaign to “destroy” her reputation. He countersued last week, claiming she had made a “duplicitous attempt to destroy” him.

On Tuesday, Baldoni’s team released almost 10 minutes of behind-the-scenes footage to outlets including the Daily Mail and Variety.

It includes three takes from a scene set in a bar, and starts with a caption saying they “clearly refute” Lively’s allegations of inappropriate behaviour, and show both actors “clearly behaving well within the scope of the scene and with mutual respect and professionalism”.

Advertisement

Lively’s lawyers said it showed him “repeatedly leaning in toward Ms Lively, attempting to kiss her, kissing her forehead, rubbing his face and mouth against her neck, flicking her lip with his thumb, caressing her, telling her how good she smells, and talking with her out of character”.

Every moment “was improvised by Mr Baldoni with no discussion or consent in advance, and no intimacy co-ordinator present”, they said.

“Any woman who has been inappropriately touched in the workplace will recognise Ms Lively’s discomfort.

“They will recognise her attempts at levity to try to deflect the unwanted touching. No woman should have to take defensive measures to avoid being touched by their employer without their consent.”

Advertisement

Releasing the video was “another example of an unethical attempt to manipulate the public”, they claimed.

Baldoni’s lawyer told the Hollywood Reporter his client was exercising “his right to publicly defend himself by putting forth actual facts and evidence”.

“Ms Lively wants very different standards to apply to her but fortunately, truth and authenticity apply to everyone and can never be wrong,” he said.

What did she say about the scene?

Advertisement

Lively’s lawsuit cited the scene as an example of how Baldoni “ignored well-established industry protocols in filming intimate scenes, and exploited the lack of controls on set to behave inappropriately”.

Her legal documents said he wasn’t speaking in character and that no sound was recorded.

“At one point, he leaned forward and slowly dragged his lips from her ear and down her neck as he said, ‘it smells so good.’

“None of this was remotely in character, or based on any dialogue in the script, and nothing needed to be said because, again, there was no sound – Mr Baldoni was caressing Ms Lively with his mouth in a way that had nothing to do with their roles.

Advertisement

“When Ms Lively later objected to this behaviour, Mr Baldoni’s response was, ‘I’m not even attracted to you.’”

What did he say about the scene?

His legal documents said Lively was “consistently unable to take direction” and that she “insisted” she wanted the characters to constantly talk, which he disagreed about.

When he tried to “encourage her to take his direction, Baldoni offered up that he and his wife often just look into each other’s eyes silently, to which she responded, ‘Like sociopaths,’ and laughed.”

Advertisement

Lively “continued arguing” and “continued to break character”, which was “extremely confusing for Baldoni”.

He said Lively apologised for the smell of her spray tan and body make-up. “Baldoni responded, ‘It smells good,’ and continued acting, slow dancing as he believed his character would with his partner, which requires some amount of physical touching.”

Lively joked about Baldoni’s nose, and that he should get plastic surgery, he said.

“Any suggestion that this scene was filmed in any manner other than pure professionalism by Baldoni is unequivocally countered with actual evidence,” his documents added.

Advertisement

“Her allegation of sexual harassment is a documented and knowingly fabricated lie.”

What does the video show?

Lively and Baldoni, who was also the film’s director, are slow dancing in a bar and their audio was recorded. After an initial exchange in which she questions whether they are in the correct position, they dance and smile silently.

He kisses her forehead then goes to kiss her on the lips before she apparently hesitates and they continue dancing. She then seems to turn her head with their faces close together and he kisses her cheek.

Advertisement

She tells him: “I think we should be talking. I think it’s more romantic if we’re like… dancing and talking.” He agrees and says “the whole montage is us talking”.

She continues: “Cause it’s like the moment they kiss, then you give them the thing that they want to see.”

He replies: “That’s why almost kissing is also good.” She responds: “Yeah. But we’re still talking.”

They continue dancing affectionately, laughing and discussing the scene. He nuzzles her neck. She tells him talking is “more romantic”. He says he “just got lost” and there’s “no issue with talking most of the time” because viewers will “never know [what’s being said] in slow motion”.

Advertisement

He tells her “I know you and Ryan [Reynolds, her husband] talk all the time”, but he and his wife Emily like to stare at each other, joking that “you would find it terrifying”. She laughs and jokes that “I’d be like, ‘Oh no I found a sociopath’”.

He asks the camera operator to film their lips “super close”, to which she agrees but adds that they should “start talking” and “don’t give it [the kiss] to them”. He agrees they should “keep restraint”.

They keep dancing with their foreheads and noses touching, upon which she starts laughing because she feels “so nosey”. He jokes that “my nose is so big” and she laughs that the film would have to “shut down” and “deal with that”, adding: “Just kidding.”

In the next take, he appears to kiss her neck then says “Am I getting beard on you today?” She laughs and responds: “I’m probably getting spray tan on you.” He nuzzles the other side of her neck and says: “It smells good”. She adds: “Well, it’s not that, it’s my body make-up”. They continue dancing and he shouts cut.

Advertisement

A third take shows their feet and bodies as they dance. The opening caption says “these are all three takes filmed of the sequence”.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025 WordupNews