Lives are being lost and families torn apart because of “woefully inadequate care” for people with eating disorders, according to a group of MPs.

The “alarming” rise in disorders such as anorexia and bulimia, over the past decade, has now become an “emergency”, the All-Party Parliamentary Group on Eating Disorders says in a report.

And greater awareness about different types of eating disorders and how they affect males and females of all ages and ethnicities is urgently needed.

NHS England acknowledged services were under extreme pressure but said all mental-health trusts now offered teenagers and young people early help.

At 13, Olimata Taal responded to issues at home by denying herself food and over-exercising.

It was the only thing she felt she could control.

“Eating healthier quickly became eating less, to eating nothing,” Olimata says.

“I remember literally feeling like a shell of a human.

“I remember having to take multiple baths a day, because my body literally couldn’t keep itself warm.”

Some teachers suspected something was wrong but failed to intervene.

And when Olimata first saw a GP, she was told to just “eat a muffin”.

Now 27, Olimata says her mixed Gambian and English heritage added another layer of complexity to her experience.

“A huge part of African culture, in my experience, is about being strong, being strong-minded,” she says.

“I didn’t see anyone who looked like me going through an eating disorder.”

After she was diagnosed with anorexia, Olimata went on to receive consistent support from Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (Camhs), which “saved her life”, although she still feels “survivor’s guilt”.

But because she did not want to lose that support, sometimes she felt no incentive to get better.

The MPs spent six months listening to “harrowing” experiences from patients, bereaved families, clinicians and academics.

Eating disorders are often misunderstood and seen as a lifestyle choice affecting only white teenage girls, the report says.

In reality, they are serious but treatable mental illnesses.

The report refers to figures showing a growing number of people affected:

The report says services are “grossly” underfunded, there are barriers to accessing treatment and wide variations in care quality across the UK.

It calls for:

• a national strategy to properly support adults, young people, families and healthcare staff
• mandatory training so front-line workers such as teachers and nurses can spot different illnesses and offer help

“That’s a very good idea,” consultant child-and-adolescent psychiatrist Dr Vic Chapman, who works for an eating-disorders service run by London’s Royal Free Hospital, says.

“There is a big treatment gap for eating disorders.”

Mollie Campbell, 17, and her family fought for six years for a diagnosis of avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID), where an individual avoids specific types of food.

Dismissed as a fussy eater, she was repeatedly refused help from eating-disorder services because she did not match the criteria for those more widely understood.

“I thought the only way to get help was to eat even less, lose more weight and get sicker,” Mollie says.

Without specialist help, her desperate family regularly took Mollie to accident and emergency, with stabbing chest pains, which doctors said could be caused by her eating habits.

“I was in such a dark place where I saw no way out,” Mollie says.

But now, armed with more information on her condition, she is feeling positive and ready to start a new chapter, at university, in September.

One of the MPs, Labour’s Richard Quigley, has been through the “nightmare” of watching his own child battle an eating disorder.

“To watch someone who is bright and funny and clever just look lost and scared because there’s no treatment coming – you feel like you’re letting your child down,” he says.

As part of its long-term plans, NHS England says it has invested additional funding to improve waiting times for eating-disorder services and more than £1bn a year goes into the provision of community mental-health care for adults.

But Mr Quigley says services are “beyond broken”, far more investment is needed, which would save the NHS money in the long term, and specific training should be rolled out for GPs, dentists and carers.

“We’re not just talking about a half day of training here,” he says.

“We’re talking about days over a year to fully understand the nuances of, not just eating disorders, but the different types of eating disorders.”

NHS England mental-health director Claire Murdoch said there was “no doubt” eating-disorder services were “under extreme pressure” but more than four out of every five children and young people who needed urgent treatment started it within one week.

“More work needs to be done, which is why every mental-health trust now offers evidence-based early interventions for 16–25-year-olds with an eating disorder,” she said.

The report also warns about the dangers of some clinics discharging patients when their body-mass index (BMI) is very low – less than 15 – indicating a severe eating disorder.

Campaigner Hope Virgo worries some people with long-term and complex eating disorders are being viewed as “untreatable” and “being sent home to die”.

However, some experts say there may be occasions where such patients could be discharged, as long as an appropriate level of intensive community or day-patient care is available.

Convicted benefits cheats who fail to pay back the taxpayer could be stripped of their driving licences, under government plans to crack down on fraud.

Those who repeatedly cheat the system and have debts of £1,000 or more could be punished with a driving ban of up to two years.

Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall said the legislation would mean “greater consequences for fraudsters who cheat and evade the system”.

The plans also include new powers to force banks to hand over account information about benefit claimants to help target investigations, echoing a scheme announced by the previous Conservative government.

But this is likely to face strong opposition from the banks and privacy campaigners.

The draft law would also give more powers to the Public Sector Fraud Authority, giving it more time to investigate complex cases of fraud that took place during the pandemic.

Current laws mean that repeat benefit cheats can already be imprisoned in the most serious cases.

Ministers have estimated greater access to banking data could save taxpayers £1.6bn over five years, by helping DWP investigators identify suspect claims more effectively.

But campaign groups have warned that it will invade claimants’ right to financial privacy, and could lead to legitimate claimants being wrongly investigated.

In a letter to Kendall in September, the directors of Big Brother Watch and Age UK described the plans as “mass financial surveillance powers” which they said would “represent a severe and disproportionate intrusion into the nation’s privacy”.

Currently, the department can only request such financial information where it has reason to suspect fraud, and only in individual cases.

The previous government argued broader powers to obtain banking information in bulk would help investigators catch previously undiscovered fraud cases.

But a Tory bill to deliver the scheme failed to make it through Parliament before July’s election.

Under that plan, financial institutions would have been required to send information to the DWP about bank accounts receiving benefit payments that indicated a “potential risk” of fraud or error, or face fines for not complying.

An official assessment of the law said the system would be “fully automated, running within existing banking systems” and be rolled out gradually from 2027.

At the time, Labour attacked the Tory legislation as “poorly delineated” – while Tory ministers argued wide-ranging powers were necessary to ensure they could apply to all types of future banks, including accounts with newer, online-only providers.

Conservative shadow work and pensions secretary Helen Whately said the government’s bill was a “continuation” of work started by the previous government and Labour “must do more to tackle the spiralling welfare budget”.

Since entering government, Labour has pledged that only “very limited information” will be shared with the department under its equivalent plan, but is yet to set out in detail how its system will work.

DWP minister Andrew Western confirmed last year this will include cases where claimants are “living abroad” without notifying the department, although a timeframe for this has yet to be specified.

Accounts could also be flagged if they are holding more than £16,000, the usual savings limit for being able to claim Universal Credit.

In a change from Tory plans, the government has said the new powers will not be used to target payments of the state pension.

Ministers have sought to reassure critics by emphasising that the DWP will not have powers to “access” bank accounts.

But campaigners have told the BBC they believe this is a “misdirection”, as the measures would give DWP the power to instruct banks to access the information on its behalf.