Connect with us

Politics

Cabinet ministers call for Jonathan Ashworth role at 10 Downing Street after weeks of infighting | Labour

Published

on

Cabinet ministers are demanding a rapid shake-up of Keir Starmer’s Downing Street operation, which they say has failed to spot obvious political banana skins, indulged in weeks of post-election infighting and been unable to promote a sufficiently positive story of Labour’s mission in government.

Some senior figures in Starmer’s team want the prime minister to bring in Jonathan Ashworth, the former frontbencher who was a regular and, many believe, effective media performer during the general election campaign, to beef up the team and give it a sharper political edge.

In one of the shocks of election night, Ashworth was narrowly defeated in Leicester South by Shockat Adam, a pro-Palestinian independent candidate. The ex-MP now heads the Starmerite thinktank Labour Together. Former colleagues believe he is wasted there and that Starmer should install him at the heart of his operation.

The calls are likely to intensify after Saturday’s shock announcement by Rosie Duffield, the MP for Canterbury, that she was resigning the Labour whip and would sit as an independent. Duffield told the prime minister she was quitting because of “cruel and unnecessary” government policies such as cuts in the winter fuel allowance and the two-child benefit cap.

Advertisement

Frustration at the way No 10 has squandered what many believed could and should have been a long political honeymoon was evident among ministers at all levels of government at last week’s Labour conference in Liverpool.

Instead of being a celebration, the party met amid plummeting poll ratings, rows about “freebies” for the PM and others, stories of top aides falling out and leaking negative information about one another, and with few substantial new policies or ideas.

Several senior ministers said stories about freebies, and internal rows between the likes of Starmer’s chief of staff, Sue Gray, and cabinet secretary Simon Case should have been headed off or, once they had emerged, shut down earlier. As it was, they had been allowed to gather momentum because too many senior figures had been preoccupied and at loggerheads, briefing against one another as they tried to establish their own power bases after the election. Another cabinet source said: “We need to sort this out. It can be dealt with. But it has to be done soon if we are to be seen as what we say we are, a government of service.”

Bemused newly elected Labour MPs, who had looked forward to some form of welcome party in Liverpool, summed up the atmosphere. “It is very strange,” one said. “Not exactly joyous is it?” Another MP, when asked if he was positive about the government’s chances of success over the next five years, said: “I am maybe 60% upbeat, not more.”

Advertisement

Since the conference ended on Wednesday with a defeat for the leadership over its controversial plans to limit winter fuel payments to pensioners, the Guardian has revealed that Starmer was given a further £16,000 of clothes before the general election by the Labour peer Waheed Alli.

For weeks, Starmer and cabinet members – who promised to end Tory sleaze – have been facing criticism for accepting gifts from Alli, which in the PM’s case included £2,400 for glasses and tens of thousands of pounds of clothes, as well as concert and football tickets from other organisations.

Much of the blame for problems inside No 10 is being laid by officials and ministers at the door of Case, who is expected to leave his post in the new year. He and Gray – two of the officials with most access to Starmer – do not get on and figures in government suspect he has been briefing against her. The BBC recently revealed that she was earning £170,000 a year – more than the PM.

“It is completely mad that we have allowed this Sue versus Case thing to go on,” said a cabinet source. “They don’t get along. We know that. Only two people would know how much Sue Gray is paid and he is one of them. He should be shipped out now.”

Advertisement

Another well-placed source said there had not yet been a proper transition of officials from opposition to government, with a clear enough allocation of roles. “You have the election campaign lot coming in to No 10 and those who worked on policy. They are kind of all in their own lanes still, but veering all over the place.”

Stories that Gray has been involved in rows with Starmer’s key aide, Morgan McSweeney, including claims that Gray had twice moved McSweeney’s desk further away from the PM’s office, have circulated but been dismissed by insiders as “completely ridiculous, total fiction”.

skip past newsletter promotion

One minister said the response to stories about freebies as slow and ineffective. “First we said nothing, then tried to put up a defence, then tried to say it was all OK, then that it wasn’t. There was no line for ages.”

Ministers also say that damaging stories – true and false – have been allowed to fill a policy vacuum caused partly by the timing of chancellor Rachel Reeves’s first budget on 30 October and the five-year spending review next spring. Ministers say they want to reveal more long-term policy ideas but do not feel able to do so before knowing what is in both documents.

One source said: “We are not able to reveal what we want to do because we are in a weird no man’s land. But we could have come up with a few more stocking fillers in the form of floating ideas and plans.”

Advertisement

The consensus within the government is that at least two or three more people with serious political and media experience need to be installed alongside the director of communications, Matthew Doyle, who helped mastermind the landslide election win, in order to spread the load and beef up the operation.

“The trouble is that to do that you have to get any plan past Sue and Matthew first,” said an insider.

“Keir is loyal to his people. He will be furious about people criticising the operation. But things have to change.”

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Politics

‘We can’t change our history’ on slave trade, says Keir Starmer

Published

on

Is Reform UK's plan to get Farage into No 10 mission impossible?
BBC Keir StarmerBBC

The UK “can’t change our history”, Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has told the BBC when asked about paying reparations to countries impacted by the transatlantic slave trade.

His comments come after diplomatic sources told the BBC that Commonwealth heads of government want to start a “meaningful conversation” about an issue that could mean the UK paying billions of pounds for its historical role in the trade.

Sir Keir, who is currently in Samoa for a meeting of Commonwealth countries, said the trade was “abhorrent” and that it was important to “talk about our history”.

Chancellor Rachel Reeves ruled out making payments, in an interview earlier on Thursday, saying “that’s not something that this government is doing”.

However, he added that the focus should be on “today’s challenges” including resilience in the face of climate change and boosting trade between Commonwealth nations.

Advertisement

He added he wanted to help member countries work with international financial institutions to “unlock money that might help them” in relation to climate change.

Leaders from 56 countries are attending the Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting taking place in Samoa on Friday and Saturday.

Commonwealth leaders are expected to defy the UK and debate ways of securing reparations for historical slavery. At its height, Britain was the world’s biggest slave-trading nation. Downing Street has the issue is not on the agenda for the summit.

Reparatory justice for slavery can come in many forms, including financial reparations, debt relief, an official apology, educational programmes, building museums, economic support, and public health assistance.

Advertisement

In the run-up to the summit, there have been growing calls from Commonwealth leaders for the UK to apologise and make reparations.

King Charles will formally open the summit and is expected to use his opening speech to pay tribute to his mother the late Queen Elizabeth II and her connection to the Commonwealth.

He will also say the Commonwealth’s scale and diversity allows it to “discuss the most challenging issues with openness and respect”.

During the gathering, a new Commonwealth secretary general will be elected. All three of the candidates – Shirley Botchwey of Ghana, Joshua Setipa of Lesotho and Mamadou Tangara of Gambia – back reparatory justice.

Advertisement

Speaking to BBC Radio 4’s Today programme, Frederick Mitchell, the foreign minister of the Bahamas, said he believed the UK would change its stance, saying: “It may take a while for people to come around but come around they will.”

During the interview with the BBC, Sir Keir was also asked about a complaint Donald Trump’s team has filed against the Labour Party objecting to its staff and activists volunteering for Kamala Harris’s presidential campaign.

“I think this needs to be seen for what it is,” the prime minister said, adding: “It is some Labour Party members and staff in their free time campaigning.

“It’s happened in every election in different parts of the world. All political parties do it… I think it needs to be put in it’s proper perspective.”

Advertisement

Sir Keir added that both he and Trump wanted to have a “good working relationship” and that the pair recently had dinner together.

He dismissed suggestions that his party were still adjusting to being in government, saying he had “absolute clarity” on his “number one mission” of economic growth.

Next Wednesday Chancellor Rachel Reeves, will set out the government’s tax and spending plans in the Budget.

Ahead of this Reeves told the BBC she would be changing the government’s self-imposed debt rules to free up money for infrastructure spending.

Advertisement

Asked about the Budget, Sir Keir said the economy barely grew under the Conservatives and that he wanted to “clear the decks” and “clear up the mess”.

“I believe in running towards problems. If you know what the problem is, what the challenge is, every business knows this, every family knows it, run towards it and fix it.”

The Conservatives have challenged Labour’s argument that they created a £22bn black hole in the economy and questioned the chancellor’s decision to change the debt rules.

The party’s shadow Treasury minister Gareth Davies said “uncertainty over additional borrowing risks interest rates staying higher and for longer.

Advertisement

“It’s families up and down the country who would pay the price.”

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

What could reparatory justice for slavery look like?

Published

on

Is Reform UK's plan to get Farage into No 10 mission impossible?
Getty Images A statue of an enslaved person breaking their shackles.Getty Images

Calls for the UK to provide reparations for its historic role in the slave trade have reignited ahead of a meeting of Commonwealth countries on Friday.

While Sir Keir Starmer said reparatory justice would not be on the agenda, Commonwealth leaders have defied the prime minister and plan to move towards a “meaningful conversation” on the issue.

The UK has long faced calls to provide reparations for its role in the Atlantic slave trade which saw millions of Africans enslaved and forced to work, largely on plantations in the Caribbean and Americas.

The chancellor told the BBC the UK would not be “paying out” reparations – but might there be other forms of reparations to consider, and how likely is it that the UK would commit to them?

Reparations are measures to make amends for past actions deemed wrong or unfair.

Advertisement

From 1500, the British government and the monarchy were prominent participants in the centuries-long slave trade, alongside other European nations.

Britain also had a key role in ending the trade, through Parliament’s passage of a law to abolish slavery in 1833.

As part of that law, British plantation owners were paid for the loss of their slaves, to the tune of some £20m.

The UK only finished paying off the debt it incurred to cover the payments in 2015.

Advertisement

Reparations for the benefit of those who suffered as result of slavery can take many forms, from financial to symbolic.

The United Nations says they must be “proportional to the gravity of the violations and the harm suffered”.

Here are some of the forms they can take.

Money

Advertisement

This is the most commonly understood form of reparatory justice – where a state gives money to a country whose communities it enslaved.

A 2023 report co-authored by a United Nations’ judge concluded that the UK owed more than £18tn to 14 countries in reparations.

The difficulty is that most European countries would struggle to find sums as astronomic as that.

The UK government, for example, spends a total of about £1.2tn every year.

Advertisement

Even if governments could find the money, it would be politically unpopular to spend so much on reparations and consequently less on schools and hospitals at home.

Some campaigners answer these points by saying reparations could be paid over time.

But many demands for straight cash payments are considered unfeasible by Western governments.

So for others, the debate about financial reparations often focuses instead on the question of debt relief.

Advertisement

Many developing countries which suffered from slavery owe large sums to Western countries.

The cancellation or reduction of that debt could lift a massive economic burden from a developing country at little political cost for a donor country.

Apology

On the face of it, this could appear relatively straightforward.

Advertisement

It does not cost anything, just a public act of atonement for past sins.

Some institutions – such as the Church of England – have apologised for links to slavery.

The difficulty, though, is that apologies can sometimes act as a declaration of legal responsibility for which there could be a financial cost.

Which is why states are often reluctant to take that step.

Advertisement

Earlier this week, former Prime Minister Tony Blair suggested it was wrong for states to apologise for historic wrongs – despite himself saying “sorry” in 2007.

“You can go back over history, and you end up in a completely absurd position”, he told Newsweek on Wednesday.

“The most important thing we can do for countries that have been marked by colonialism is to help them now.”

Few states that played a historic role in the slave trade have taken steps towards reparations.

Advertisement

Education

This includes educational institutions acknowledging their own connection to slavery and how they might have profited from the slave trade.

It can also involve teaching the history of slavery, as well as creating institutions for the study of slavery.

There are also calls for supporting schools to tackle low literacy levels and other issues that some argue date back to the slave trade.

Advertisement

Some campaigners say school exchanges and cultural tours would also be beneficial.

The countries pushing hardest for reparatory justice from the UK are in the Caribbean – and their collective organisation, known as Caricom, has its own reparations commission with 10 demands.

Three of these deal explicitly with education and culture, saying a “restoration of historical memory” was required.

Caricom said states involved in the slave trade had a responsibility to “build educational capacity and provide scholarships”.

Advertisement

Health

Some argue that reparatory justice should also include health – where European countries fund clinics and hospitals.

Medical evidence shows a high rate of type 2 diabetes in the Caribbean which some suggest is associated with centuries of poor nutrition due to past enslavement.

Historian Sir Hilary Beckles told the United Nations’s UN News earlier this year: “If you look at countries with the greatest incidence of chronic diseases, black people have the highest proportions of diabetic adult patients in the world.”

Advertisement

He argued high rates of diabetes on his own island of Barbados “cannot be a coincidence” given it was “the first island to have an African majority and an enslaved population”.

Barbados’ government has moved toward exploring the historic impact of slavery on its population’s health.

Caricom is calling for European countries to invest in science, technology and capital toward improving hospitals, healthcare, and mental health support for the descendants of enslaved people.

Is the UK likely to provide reparations?

Advertisement

The UK government has never formally apologised for slavery or offered to pay reparations – and Sir Keir Starmer has not shown any intention to break the mould.

It is not Labour Party policy to introduce reparations.

Ahead of the Commonwealth summit, the prime minister explicitly said he would not provide an apology or financial compensation for slavery.

He said he wanted to focus on present issues, like the climate, rather than the past.

Advertisement

Chancellor Rachel Reeves doubled down on Thursday afternoon, insisting the UK would not be paying reparations.

“I’d rather roll up my sleeves and work… on the current future-facing challenges than spend a lot of time on the past”, she said.

In 2023, then Prime Minister Rishi Sunak likewise refused to provide compensation or an apology for the slave trade.

“Trying to unpick our history is not the right way forward”, he said.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Victims concerned over missing Windrush reform

Published

on

Victims concerned over missing Windrush reform

Windrush campaigners have expressed concern that the home secretary has yet to announce when she will implement a key recommendation from the government’s review.

On Thursday, Yvette Cooper announced an additional £1.5m of funding to help victims apply for compensation overseen by a Windrush Commissioner – but did not hand over recommended powers to a watchdog.

Campaigners told the BBC they were happy with Labour’s approach, but thought the new system lacked “teeth”.

A Home Office source described the changes as the “first set of announcements on Windrush since the election,” adding that the focus had been on priorities highlighted by campaigners and victims.

Advertisement

The Windrush Review’s report, published by Wendy Williams in 2020, made 30 recommendations which were all adopted by then home secretary Priti Patel.

But in January 2023, her successor Suella Braverman dropped three of them, including establishing a migrants’ commissioner role and giving the immigration watchdog – the Independent Chief Inspector of Borders and Immigration – the power to publish its own reports.

The watchdog currently has the power to carry out investigations, but the findings can only be published by the home secretary.

Following a legal challenge by Windrush victim Trevor Donald, a judge in June condemned Braverman’s actions as “conspicuously unfair”.

Advertisement

On Thursday, Cooper announced a Windrush commissioner would be appointed, but did not mention the Independent Chief Inspector of Borders and Immigration.

In February the then-chief inspector David Neal was sacked for leaking reports he had written that he claimed the Home Office was sitting on.

At the time, Cooper who was still in opposition said a “series of Conservative home secretaries have sought to bury uncomfortable truths revealed by the chief inspector”.

On Thursday, Cooper said she was “changing the government’s approach” to “ensure a scandal of this kind can never happen again and dignity can be restored to those so tragically affected”.

Advertisement

A Home Office source said this was the “first set of announcements on Windrush since the election” and said the focus had been on priorities raised by campaigners and victims.

They indicated that a new Windrush Unit, also announced today, could look at how to implement the final recommendation.

Following today’s announcement Cooper met representatives of Windrush campaign groups.

Some of those present welcomed the tone of the home secretary and said the new government appeared to “get” what it was that campaigners were looking for.

Advertisement

But they said there was no mention of when the Home Office would look at more powers for the chief inspector.

One said that the chief inspector needs to “have teeth” and be able to hold ministers to account “in a proper way”.

They said today’s meeting “marked the beginning” of relations between the new Labour government.

Campaigners said that Cooper had made it clear there were still parts of the Home Office that needed to change.

Advertisement

Another said the meeting was “uplifting” compared to ones held with Conservative ministers, but said the chief inspector “needs to be able to publish its findings” in order to prevent a similar scandal happening again.

The Windrush scandal emerged in 2018 when Commonwealth citizens, mostly from the Caribbean, were wrongly detained, deported or threatened with deportation despite having the right to live and work in the UK.

It was discovered that the Home Office had kept no records of those granted permission to stay and had not issued the paperwork they needed to confirm their status.

Many lost homes and jobs and were denied access to healthcare and benefits.

Advertisement

The government apologised in 2018, when it launched the Williams’ review.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Nigel Farage calls on Tory councillors to switch to Reform UK

Published

on

Is Reform UK's plan to get Farage into No 10 mission impossible?
Reuters Nigel Farage making a speech.Reuters

Nigel Farage has called on Conservative county councillors to join Reform UK by 6 November

Nigel Farage has called on Conservative county councillors to defect to his Reform UK party.

In a letter obtained by the BBC, party leader Farage warns Tory councillors Reform’s “ground campaign capabilities will be formidable” by May’s local elections.

Speaking on X, Farage, who is also MP for Clacton in Essex, said he was writing to 1,352 Conservative county councillors as “a huge number of them genuinely agree with us and what we stand for”.

A Conservative party spokesman said: “Reform has delivered a Labour government. A vote for Reform this coming May is a vote for a Labour council.”

Advertisement

‘Councillors in talks with us’

In a letter sent to Essex Conservative county councillors, Farage says “our door is open should you consider standing for Reform UK”.

Farage told them since the general election “we’ve been assembling a national election winning machine at historic speed with hundreds of branches already established and over 90,000 active members ready to campaign”.

He has given Conservative councillors until 6 November to join and warns there will be a Reform candidate standing against them.

Advertisement

“Once somebody has been selected, we will not stand them down,” he wrote.

Farage said there were “other councillors in talks with us” after two Southend councillors defected from the Conservatives in September.

Conservative Kevin Bentley, leader of Essex County Council, said Farage’s letter “does smack of desperation”.

He said: “Some members have had a message from Reform and dismissed it.”

Advertisement

First Reform county councillor

A former Conservative councillor who was briefly a general election candidate has joined Reform UK.

Jaymey McIvor, who represents Ongar on Essex County Council, announced on X that he had joined Farage’s party.

The Conservatives said McIvor was expelled from the party on 9 October following a disciplinary hearing.

Advertisement

McIvor said he had already quit and that he had joined Reform UK as it “puts people and country first”.

He accused the Conservative Party of being “too weak to deal with its handful of toxic individuals” and they “tried to punish my ambition and vision”.

He said: “Reform has won the trust of the next generation. We are the future, we want our country back on track, rescuing it from the unpatriotic minority and put the patriotic majority back in the driver’s seat.”

Jaymey McIvor campaigning with Iain Duncan Smith. Both are smiling

Jaymey McIvor (left) campaigning for the Conservatives in 2023 with Iain Duncan Smith

McIvor was selected to stand for the Conservatives in Hemel Hempstead in the general election. But hours from the deadline for nominations to be submitted he was dropped and suspended by the party pending an investigation.

Advertisement

A Conservative spokesperson said: “Mr McIvor was suspended by the party and removed from the candidates list in June.

“After a disciplinary hearing, he was expelled from the Conservative Party on 9 October.”

McIvor says he will “continue to serve my residents” as a Reform UK councillor on both Essex County Council and Epping Forest District Council.

Elections for Essex County Council are due to be held in May 2025.

Advertisement

Earlier this year, McIvor posted on X: “For every person that joins Reform UK , they become another campaigner for a Labour government, which would achieve the polar opposite to what they want to see changed.”

A spokesperson for Reform UK said: “We believe James McIvor has been the victim of vicious Tory infighting.

“We look forward to announcing many more councillors joining us in Essex from the Tory sinking ship.”

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Rachel Reeves rejects calls for UK to act

Published

on

Is Reform UK's plan to get Farage into No 10 mission impossible?
UK Government UK Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has short greying hair and weard brown thin-rimmed glasses with a blue suit over a white shirt. He chats to Samoa Prime Minister Fiamē Naomi Mataʻafa, who has short grey hair and wears a green, orange and pink outfit, as they sit at a table decorated with flowers and laden with several wine glasses.UK Government

Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer, who is at the Commonwealth summit, has said he wants to focus on the future.

The UK is “not going to be paying out” reparations for the transatlantic slave trade, Chancellor Rachel Reeves has told the BBC.

She said she understood why Commonwealth leaders would be making such demands but it was not something the UK government would commit to.

The legacy of slavery will be raised by the leaders at their summit in Samoa, which Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer is attending.

Ahead of Friday’s meeting, he said he wanted to discuss current challenges, especially climate change, rather than issues of the past.

Advertisement

“That’s where I’m going to put my focus – rather than what will end up being very, very long endless discussions about reparations,” he said.

“Of course slavery is abhorrent to everybody; the trade and the practice, there’s no question about that. But I think from my point of view… I’d rather roll up my sleeves and work… on the current future-facing challenges.”

The chancellor reiterated that message in an interview with the BBC, saying: “We’re not going to be paying out the reparations that some countries are speaking about.

“I understand why they make those demands but that’s not something that this government is doing.”

Advertisement

Commonwealth leaders at the Samoa summit are expected to defy the UK and debate ways of securing reparations for historical slavery. At its height, Britain was the world’s biggest slave-trading nation.

Downing Street insists the issue is not on the agenda for the summit of 56 Commonwealth countries.

But diplomatic sources said officials were negotiating an agreement to conduct further research and begin a “meaningful conversation” about an issue which could potentially leave the UK owing billions of pounds in reparations.

Frederick Mitchell, foreign minister of the Bahamas, believes the UK could change its stance and he told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme: “Once you broach the subject it may take a while for people to come around but come around they will.”

Advertisement

Reparatory justice for slavery can come in many forms, including financial reparations, debt relief, an official apology, educational programmes, building museums, economic support, and public health assistance.

Mr Mitchell told the Commonwealth gathering: “It’s a simple matter – it can be done, one sentence, one line.”

He said to the BBC: “The word is apologise, that’s the word.”

Asked how much reparations should amount to, he said it was not just a matter of money but of “respect, acknowledging the past was a wrong that needs to be corrected”.

Advertisement

He said member countries “want the conversation to start” but “there appears to be even a reluctance to have the conversation”.

Earlier, a UK government spokesperson said: “Reparations are not on the agenda for the Commonwealth Heads of Government meeting. The government’s position has not changed – we do not pay reparations.

“We are focused on using the summit at [the Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting] to discuss the shared opportunities which we can unlock across the Commonwealth – including securing more economic growth.”

It is understood the Downing Street position – that reparatory justice is not on the agenda – while technically correct, has angered some Caribbean ministers when it was obvious the issue would be discussed at the summit.

Advertisement

‘Sorrow and regret’

King Charles is in Samoa for a four-day visit and is due to formally open Friday’s summit.

On a visit to Kenya last year, the King expressed the “greatest sorrow and regret” over the “wrongdoings” of the colonial era, but stopped short of issuing an apology, which would have required the agreement of ministers.

Some non-Caribbean countries are not unsympathetic towards the British position and want the summit to focus more on existing challenges – such as climate change, which is adversely affecting many Commonwealth countries, about half of whom are small island states.

Advertisement

But Caribbean countries seem determined to keep pressing the issue.

All three candidates hoping to be elected this weekend as the next secretary general of the Commonwealth – Shirley Botchwey of Ghana, Joshua Setipa of Lesotho and Mamadou Tangara of Gambia – have made clear they support reparatory justice.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Councillors to be allowed to work from home, says Angela Rayner

Published

on

Is Reform UK's plan to get Farage into No 10 mission impossible?
YouTube An image of Jackie Weaver from a Zoom parish council meeting in early 2021YouTube

Jackie Weaver went viral when she kicked two councillors out of a virtual meeting

Councillors in England will be allowed to take part in debates from home using their computers, Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner has announced.

At the moment all local councillors are required by law to attend certain meetings in person.

The rules were suspended during the Covid pandemic, which led to Parish Council officer Jackie Weaver briefly becoming a social media sensation.

The Zoom meeting she was chairing in early 2021 erupted into fury, with Ms Weaver being told she had “no authority here” after she kicked two councillors out of the meeting.

Advertisement

The law change allowing council meetings to be held remotely expired on 6 May 2021.

At the time, Ms Weaver joined calls to keep virtual meetings as an option, saying scrapping them would be a “dreadful idea”.

Under the proposed new rules, councillors will also be allowed to vote on behalf of others who can’t attend debates, such as for childcare or health reasons.

Rayner told local government chiefs it would be up to them to “decide whether councillors should attend your meetings remotely or use proxy votes when they need to”.

Advertisement

Speaking at the Local Government Association’s (LGA) annual conference in Harrogate, the deputy prime minister said she would “[make] it possible for people from all walks of life to have a stake in local democracy, whether they have caring responsibilities or aren’t able to make it to the town hall in person because of illness or disability”.

The government has published a public consultation on the proposals.

Last year an LGA survey of around a third of English councils found nine in 10 had councillors who would make use of virtual meetings if allowed.

It comes as Whitehall civil servants were told they should be spending at least three days a week working in the office.

Advertisement

Councillors will no longer have to make their home addresses public, Rayner also confirmed.

The LGA had previously pushed for ending the legal obligation to publish addresses amid a rise in abuse and intimidation faced by local councillors.

Getty Images Angela Rayner wearing a white jacket sitting down against a red curtain backdropGetty Images

Angela Rayner was speaking at the Local Government Association conference

Rayner, who is also the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, said she would allow councils to suspend local councillors for bad behaviour.

She said she had been occasionally been “made aware of cases of persistent bullying and harassment by councillors, even in some case leading to victims resignations”.

Advertisement

Rayner also reiterated that the government will return to giving councils multi-year funding settlements.

The Conservatives had been agreeing funding on a yearly basis, which councils said made it hard to plan their budgets.

She also said she will end local authorities having to compete against each other for government grants.

But there was no hint that any more money might be in store for cash-strapped councils in the Budget next week.

Advertisement

One in four councils say they are likely to need an emergency bailout from the government within the next two years without more cash now.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 WordupNews.com