Connect with us
DAPA Banner

Politics

Channel 5 Execs Explain Huw Edwards Drama Power’s Surreal Ending

Published

on

Channel 5 Execs Explain Huw Edwards Drama Power's Surreal Ending

The executives behind 5’s new drama about Huw Edwards have opened up about the show’s surreal final moments.

Power: The Downfall Of Huw Edwards aired on Tuesday night, starring Martin Clunes as the disgraced former BBC News presenter.

While the feature-length drama opened with a recreation of Edwards announcing the news of Queen Elizabeth II’s death to the nation, in what was intended to serve as a reminder of the position of authority he held before he became embroiled in scandal, it ended with an imagined news broadcast featuring him reporting on his own fall from grace.

On Tuesday, Variety published an interview with 5 commissioners Guy Davies in which they reflected on how these book-end scenes came to be.

Advertisement

Testar said the opening sequence highlighted that “there is no more trusted emblem of the establishment in our society than the person who’s given the responsibility of telling the public that the Queen had died”.

Davies agreed: “[Edwards was] incredibly trusted by the public, and in a way, that trust became a bit of a metaphor in the film, because that’s also about power and the abuse of power. And that’s why I think it’s such an interesting story…”

Testar said that the idea for the final scene wasn’t in “the very first draft” but arose “pretty early on” in the creative process.

“It felt like a very important thing to end the story on, to remind the audience what the scale and detail of Edward’s crimes were,” he claimed, with Davies adding: “And being, you know, finally accountable to the public in the medium which he worked in.”

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Politics

Labour ‘s answer to the energy crisis? Corporate welfare

Published

on

Labour 's answer to the energy crisis? Corporate welfare

Labour’s answer to the energy crisis, spurred on by the war on Iran, is to subsidise the profits of fossil fuel companies. According to the Times, only households on benefits will receive the money that helps prop up energy companies.

Instead, Labour should bring energy into public ownership, while transitioning to a Green New Deal to address not only the climate crisis, but volatile international markets and sky high costs, in one fell swoop.

Corporate stranglehold

While energy is privatised, companies have a stranglehold on individuals in our society. The free market is supposed to be about an individual choice, but everyone needs energy so there is no choice but to purchase it from a provider. Households and businesses’ costs may deviate across companies, but publicly owned energy could provide the absolute cheapest through wholesaling renewables for the entire country.

Labour has so far announced a £53 million support package for “vulnerable” households who use heated oil.

Advertisement

Labour — welfare for large companies

Again, the market is supposed to be ‘free’, yet corporations receive huge benefits from the government. 22% of The Union of Shop, Distributive and Allied Workers receive universal credit (UC). That means the public purse is significantly subsidising the profits of companies like Tesco, which makes £6,150 of profit per employee.

Direct subsidies is another way the public purse delivers corporate welfare. The government is providing £2.5bn to the steel industry this parliament, without taking a stake in steel companies that would provide public monetary benefit.

This is a continuation of the Conservative agenda. In the 2023/24 year, some of the government’s subsidies to corporations amounted to a whopping £32bn. The year before, they were £53bn because gas inflation not only increased bills but also the government increased corporate handouts to profiteering fossil fuel companies. And now Starmer has announced a further £22bn bung to the fossil fuel sector for carbon capture projects that don’t work.

Government intervention appears to be focused on benefiting corporations, rather than the whole of society.

Advertisement

Featured image via the Canary

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

School staff to strike in support of victimised union rep Tom Barker

Published

on

School staff to strike in support of victimised union rep Tom Barker

UNISON members at Ash Field Academy, a SEND school in Evington, Leicester, have voted overwhelmingly to take strike action to demand the reinstatement of their elected representative, Tom Barker.

In a formal industrial action ballot which closed on 18 March, 87% of voting members supported strike action. This is due to the suspension of Barker, their workplace steward, who has been suspended since October 2025, and the attack this represents on their trade union rights. The turnout easily cleared the legal 50% participation threshold.

For more than four months, UNISON’s Leicester City branch has been campaigning for Barker’s reinstatement. Discovery Schools Academy Trust (DSAT), the multi-academy trust which runs the school, claims it’s still investigating his case. Although DSAT has changed the allegations it claims to be investigating since the initial suspension.

More than 400 trade unionists, including UNISON’s new general secretary Andrea Egan and MP Zarah Sultana, have signed an open letter demanding Barker’s reinstatement.

Advertisement

Background to Barker’s suspension

During the 2024/25 academic year, UNISON, which represents the vast majority of Ash Field’s support staff, repeatedly raised concerns relating to health and safety. This situation worsened when DSAT, despite UNISON’s strenuous objections, cut several further staff via a hugely rushed redundancy process. UNISON members voted for strike action over the staffing situation, with that ballot closing on 20 October 2025.

On 30 October, DSAT leaders suspended Barker from his duties, citing allegations against him. Originally they said that the suspension was due to an incident that allegedly took place on 29 October. However, Barker obtained emails via a Subject Access Request. And these showed that, as far back as December, the independent investigating officer had reported that there was no case to answer and recommended lifting the suspension. But DSAT failed to act on this.

Many UNISON members at Ash Field signed a statement describing his suspension as “a bad-faith attack on…. UNISON members” and a “reprisal for [members] voting for industrial action”.

On 12 January 2026, DSAT leaders asserted that Barker’s suspension was to protect the integrity of an investigation into a grievance. This investigation concluded in February, yet DSAT didn’t reinstate Barker.

Advertisement

The external investigators into the two previous allegations found no case to answer. But the trust has since appointed a new investigator from a separate organisation to investigate again. And Barker, after 4 months out of work, has been resuspended.

UNISON Leicester City continues to call for Barker’s reinstatement, and for DSAT to cease this union-busting activity. Sam Randfield, UNISON Leicester City’s branch secretary, stated at a public meeting in February:

It was clear at the time of the suspension, and it is even clearer today, that this was an act of bad faith towards UNISON and Tom himself. The case against Tom is practically non-existent. There is no reason to keep him suspended for this long.

What has happened to Tom is appalling, and is as clear a case of trade union victimisation as I have ever seen. In voting for strike action so overwhelmingly, our members have made a clear statement that they will not tolerate union-busting in their workplace.

There is a quick and easy way for DSAT to end this dispute and avoid strike action. They simply need to lift Tom’s suspension and reinstate him to duty. That is the one and only demand our members are making.

Advertisement

Featured image via the Canary

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Protest outside property developer to save Bristol Zoo heritage site

Published

on

Protest outside property developer to save Bristol Zoo heritage site

The Save Bristol Gardens Alliance gathered to protest outside Acorn Property Group’s offices in Clifton on 25 March.

Ever since the closure of Bristol Zoo in September 2022, campaigners have been opposing the site’s planned redevelopment.

The Alliance wants see the gardens preserved as “a site of huge cultural, historical and environmental importance with many listed buildings.”

Acorn Property Group

Although the sale of the former Bristol Zoo has not yet gone through, Acorn have nonetheless started clearing bushes and felling trees.

Advertisement

Campaigners are concerned about Acorn’s track record, and have written to the Bristol Zoological Society (BZS) repeatedly to raise their objections.

A spokesperson for Save Bristol Gardens Alliance said:

Acorn Property Group is a wholly unsuitable developer for the Zoo Gardens site, and it seems clear that BZS Trustees have failed to complete independent due diligence on Acorn.

Our concerns relate directly to the reputation, financial resilience, track record, and funding model of Acorn, as well as to the likelihood of Acorn not delivering on its agreement with BZS, the development itself or indeed any of the so-called ‘public benefits’.

Given the site’s importance to the local area, campaigners are also disappointed in the lack of transparency surrounding the planned redevelopment. The spokesperson continued:

Advertisement

Trustees are required to demonstrate that they have properly scrutinised risk, applied independent judgement and operated transparently particularly in relation to decisions of this scale and sensitivity.

Given the significance of the decision and the level of public interest the people of Bristol are entitled to expect transparent decision making. It is not enough just to delegate due diligence to Savills, who of course act for Acorn in respect of a number of other developments.

So far, the Society “have declined to answer a single point” the Alliance has raised. They are now urging the BZS “to address these concerns fully and transparently before any contractual commitment is completed.”

They argue that the BZS “risks making a reckless decision, which could be catastrophic for trustee reputations, BZS’s reputation and, of course, for a treasured part of Bristol’s heritage.”

More protests to come

The protest on 25 March was the third – and largest – protest to take place outside Acorn’s offices in recent weeks. 50 members of the Save Bristol Gardens Alliance first gathered there on 11 March.

Advertisement

The Alliance plans to keep demonstrating outside Acorn’s offices, meeting every Wednesday at 12:30.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Newly discovered film gives extraordinary first hand account of the General Strike

Published

on

Newly discovered film gives extraordinary first hand account of the General Strike

A newly discovered documentary film provides an extraordinary first-hand account of the General Strike of 1926. And it shows how close many of the strikers thought it brought them to a revolution.

This historic documentary, The General Strike – A Revolution Betrayed?, made in the early 1970s, was unearthed in the archive of radical filmmaker Platform Films.

Norman Thomas of Platform Films says that the power of the 70 minute film lies in its extensive use of first hand testimony of strikers and strikers’ relatives.

Thomas said:

Advertisement

This is the General Strike of 1926 as told by the people who actually lived through it. The film vividly illustrates how the strike was opposed by the full force of the British establishment but how close the strikers felt they came to success.

He added:

Many strikers believed they were on the verge of a revolution – a revolution that only failed because they were betrayed by union leaders.

It’s been a hundred years since workers across the country come out in support of over a million miners locked out of work for refusing to accept lower pay. Thomas claims the film contains vital lessons for present day trade unionists.

He said:

The film highlights the importance of rank and file solidarity across industries, highly disciplined grassroots organisation – and a deep distrust of union leaders!

The film also provides a unique insight into the human impact of the General Strike – an aspect, Thomas argues, that’s had too little coverage.

Advertisement

He said:

The film shows how people came out of the strike devastated. Whole communities were in pieces. The failure of the strike was a hugely traumatic event.

And Thomas added:

Watching the film, you get a real sense of how close the strike came to success. If it had succeeded, the strike would have undoubtedly changed the course of British history.

Award-winning radical filmmaker Platform Films has made the documentary available for screenings and viewings. You can get a copy of the film on memory stick, DVD or via an online link. The cost to institutions, including trades union councils, is £60. For individuals and union branches the cost is £20. There is no additional charge for screening the film publicly but donations are welcome. Email [email protected] for more details.

Watch a trailer of the film on YouTube.

Advertisement

Featured image via Platform Films

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

BMA staff announce further walkout for same day as resident doctors’ strike

Published

on

BMA staff announce further walkout for same day as resident doctors' strike

British Medical Association (BMA) staff have set further strike dates for Monday 6 and Tuesday 7 April. These will coincide with the start of the six-day resident doctors’ strike on 7 April.

The first round of BMA strikes kicks off this week, on Friday 27 and Saturday 28 March.

Like the resident doctors, BMA staff are in dispute with their employer over years of sub-inflationary pay awards, which have seen staff pay eroded by almost 17%.

The BMA’s most recent pay offer to its staff of 2.75% is lower than the latest doctors’ and dentists’ pay review body recommendation of 3.5% to resident doctors. The BMA described that as a “crushing blow” to doctors.

Advertisement

Hundreds of staff, who are represented by GMB Union, recently voted 96% to strike on an 80% turnout.

Many doctor BMA members have shared public messages of solidarity with the staff.

Gavin Davies, GMB senior organiser, said:

These strikes have laid bare the BMA’s ongoing hypocrisy. Our members want to focus on doing what they do best: supporting their members at work.

But just like the resident doctors they support, they cannot continue to accept another year of pay erosion while the cost of living continues to spiral.

Advertisement

We are urging the BMA to come back to the table with a constructive offer that recognises our members’ value.

Picket details for BMA staff strikes on Friday 27 March:

  • London 8am-2pm: BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JP.
  • Belfast 11am: BMA Northern Ireland, Urban HQ, Eagle Star House, 5-7 Upper Queen Street, Belfast, BT1 6FB.
  • Cardiff 10am-12pm: BMA Cymru Wales, 2 Caspian Point, Caspian Way, Cardiff Bay, Cardiff, CF10 4DQ.
  • Edinburgh 10.30am-12pm: BMA Scotland, 14 Queen Street, Edinburgh EH2 1LL.

Featured image via the Canary

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Jennifer Garner Is Remaking 13 Going On 30 With A New ‘Magical Pairing’

Published

on

Jennifer Garner Is Remaking 13 Going On 30 With A New 'Magical Pairing'

With the last few years offering up a musical re-do of Mean Girls, a Legally Blonde prequel series, two Avatar follow-ups, a new TV adaptation of Harry Potter, a long-awaited sequel to The Devil Wears Prada and planned revivals of Pirates Of The Caribbean and The Lord Of The Rings, appetite for 2000s movies is clearly showing no sign of waning.

It’s now been announced that another classic from around the turn of the millennium is being given the remake treatment, with a new version of 13 Going On 30 in the works at Netflix.

The film’s original star Jennifer Garner will serve as an executive producer on the project, which will star People We Meet On Vacation’s Emily Bader and The Perks Of Being A Wallflower’s Logan Lerman as its romantic leads.

Director Brett Haley told Deadline: “13 Going On 30 is one of those rare, perfect films. Funny, emotional, deeply human, with unforgettable performances from Jennifer Garner, Mark Ruffalo and Judy Greer.

Advertisement

“I’m a longtime fan, so stepping into this reimagining comes with tremendous responsibility. Jennifer Garner being on board as an executive producer, after playing such a big part of what made the original special, is especially meaningful.”

He added: “I also couldn’t be more excited to reunite with Emily Bader after People We Meet On Vacation. She and the amazingly talented Logan Lerman are a magical pairing. I feel incredibly lucky to be trusted with something that means so much to so many people.”

The original 13 Going On 30 centres around a teenage girl who is granted a wish to fast-forward to her life at 30 years old, with no memory of the 17 years that have passed.

Jennifer starred as Jenna Rink in the rom-com, with Mark Ruffalo playing her love interest Matty Flamhaff, while the supporting cast included Judy Greer, Andy Serkis and Phil Reeves.

Advertisement

13 Going On 13 is currently streaming on Prime Video.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Reform MPs Storm Out Of Commons As Farage Calls PM ‘Waste Of Space’

Published

on

Reform MPs Storm Out Of Commons As Farage Calls PM 'Waste Of Space'

Reform UK MPs angrily stormed out of the House of Commons during prime minister’s questions today after an exchange with Keir Starmer.

The eight parliamentarians dramatically left the chamber after party leader Nigel Farage asked the prime minister about his promise to “smash” the people-smuggling gangs.

“Is it not time to admit that smash the gangs has been total abject failure, along frankly with most of his other policies?” Farage said. “Isn’t it now time that he told us, as summer approaches, what is plan B?”

When Starmer dodged the question and turned his response back onto Reform’s recent U-turns over the Iran war, Farage and his colleagues chose to walk out.

Advertisement

Another MP in the chamber told HuffPost UK that the MP for Clacton called Starmer a “waste of space” as he was leaving.

“Farage lost his temper,” the MP said, while also claiming that Reform MP Andrew Rosindell “didn’t want to leave”.

The walkout occurred after the prime minister claimed Farage wants to “exploit” the country’s problems, not solve them.

Starmer said: “This is the man of the party who voted against giving law-enforcement counter-terrorism to tackle them.

Advertisement

“He wants the grievance, he doesn’t want it sorted.

“He then said let’s join the war – a week later, a screeching U-turn, we don’t want to go to war – and he says, trust his judgement.

“It’s hard to take anything he says seriously. He promised lower tax and now Reform councils are hiking tax by 9%.”

He pointed out that Farage also said he wished Reform “hadn’t bothered” to win the Worcestershire council earlier this month because it’s bankrupt.

Advertisement

The PM continued: “He asks for people’s votes and then he abandons them. Reform don’t want to solve problems, they only want to exploit them.”

He called the party an “absolute disgrace”.

Reform’s departure from the packed Commons caused a huge amount of laughter from their fellow MPs.

In a following question about snooker, the prime minister then joked: “I see Reform have walked out – they obviously realised they’re absolutely snookered!”

Advertisement

Reform MP Sarah Pochin later wrote on X: “Yet another disgraceful performance from the prime minister today at PMQs. Why won’t you answer the question, Keir Starmer?”

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

The Nottingham killings have exposed a broken Britain

Published

on

The Nottingham killings have exposed a broken Britain

On 13 June 2023, Valdo Calocane, a paranoid schizophrenic, fatally stabbed three people in the centre of Nottingham. Over the past four weeks, I have been closely following the Nottingham Inquiry – a public investigation into how Calocane, a violent psychotic and known risk to the public, was ever in a position to roam the streets freely. The inquiry has also looked at the response to Calocane’s murders – including the terrible treatment of the victim’s families by our institutions, from the police to the local authority. If ever there was a case that encapsulated a truly broken Britain, it is the story of Valdo Calocane.

Barnaby Webber and Grace O’Malley-Kumar, two 19-year-old students at the University of Nottingham, were Calocane’s first victims. It was 4am and the two friends were walking back to their student accommodation, having been out celebrating the end of term. They were nearly home when Calocane, who had been hiding in a nearby alleyway, attacked them on the street. Both were fatally stabbed before, according to a judicial summary, the killer ‘calmly’ left the scene.

Calocane’s next victim was Ian Coates, a 65-year-old school caretaker. He was stabbed 15 times. Calocane left Coates’s body on the street before stealing his van and driving into the centre of Nottingham, where he attempted to mow down three members of the public in two separate incidents. Miraculously, all three survived, but not without significant injuries. In 2024, Calocane was sentenced to an indefinite hospital order, having had his charges downgraded to manslaughter on the grounds of his mental illness.

Advertisement

A month into the inquiry, one thing is crystal clear: Coates, Webber and O’Malley-Kumar were killed by Calocane, but they were failed by the British state. Calocane had been dangerously unwell for many years: in 2020, when he began to experience his first bouts of violent psychosis, health officials declined to section him because of the ‘over-representation of young black men in prison’. The Nottingham NHS Mental Health Care Trust, who became primarily responsible for Calocane’s care, did not administer anti-psychotic medication because of his fear of needles.

Despite his increasingly aggressive behaviour, which included forcing a neighbour to jump from her first-floor balcony after he broke in the door, Calocane remained at large. Prior to his fatal attacks, he assaulted police officers, emergency workers, flatmates and colleagues. He stalked strangers and repeatedly tried to break into neighbouring properties. At the time of the attack, he was the subject of an outstanding arrest warrant.

Advertisement

Enjoying spiked?

Why not make an instant, one-off donation?

We are funded by you. Thank you!

Advertisement




Please wait…

Advertisement
Advertisement

Even without these frightening outbursts, the very nature of Calocane’s thoughts should have been enough to suggest that he posed a grave risk to society. He believed that he was being spied on by MI6. He ‘heard voices’ that told him his family was going to die – voices that he believed were the ‘creation of mental-health services’. In 2021, Calocane even travelled to Thames House in London, the headquarters of MI5, asking to be arrested. How was this man ever allowed to roam the streets?

The negligence and incompetence of the responsible authorities does not end there. Over the past few days, we have learnt harrowing details of how the victims’ families were treated by Nottinghamshire Police and Nottingham City Council. Coates’s body, we heard, was left on the road for 15 hours. His son was notified of his death on Instagram after receiving a message from a family friend. Inexplicably, the inquiry has also heard that Coates’s three sons were excluded from a vigil organised by the council – a memorial they had only been made aware of after receiving an inquiry from a journalist.

Advertisement

The conduct of the police has been exposed as truly scandalous. Multiple officers involved in the case were found to have spent an inappropriate amount of time looking at pictures and footage related to the crimes. The consequent misconduct hearing was concealed from the families. Bizarrely, the families were kept apart by the police throughout Calocane’s trial. Each family was told that the other preferred privacy when, in fact, the opposite was true – they were desperate to connect with one another, and have since formed incredibly close bonds.

Nottingham is not the same place after Calocane’s crimes. Each victim represented something unique about the city I grew up in and where I continue to live. Coates was an avid fisherman and Nottingham Forest supporter – a classic Nottingham bloke. He was a loving father and grandfather. The school he was travelling to on the morning of his death, where he worked as a janitor, was the same school my son attended. Webber and O’Malley-Kumar were doing what all Nottingham students do – enjoying the nightlife that has become part of the city’s character.

Walking through Nottingham on any day of the week you will encounter people with serious drug and alcohol problems. This once-proud metropolis, a former centre of British industry, is now littered with the tents and sleeping bags of its many homeless residents. At times, it feels as though, everywhere you look, all you see are people with serious mental-health issues – whether they are asking you for money, or merely shouting into the ether. Nottingham, like so many towns and cities now feels abandoned and unsafe. I no longer feel proud of Nottingham, the city I grew up in and where I continue to live.

Advertisement

Nottingham City Council has, perhaps wisely, said nothing throughout the inquiry. A few weeks ago, however, it saw fit to share the fact that it has been awarded the ‘Purple Flag’ award for safe cities on its Facebook account. This was on the same day the inquiry uncovered the extent of Calocane’s violence during a previous arrest. Its lack of sensitivity and awareness was sadly symbolic of the state’s failures that have been reinforced over the past four weeks.

Either through neglect or design, UK institutions are failing to keep people safe. This has been one of the most glaring facts exposed throughout the last four weeks. And, when tragedy does occur, it is families that carry the load in getting justice – whether it is Hillsborough, Grenfell or Nottingham, the state’s first response is always to protect itself.

We must never forget Valdo Calocane’s victims. But it is also our duty not to let the authorities who enabled his crimes off the hook. We must not tolerate Broken Britain any longer.

Advertisement

Lisa McKenzie is a working-class academic.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Savannah Guthrie: ‘We Are In Agony’

Published

on

Savannah Guthrie: ‘We Are In Agony’

!function(n){if(!window.cnx){window.cnx={},window.cnx.cmd=[];var t=n.createElement(‘iframe’);t.display=’none’,t.onload=function(){var n=t.contentWindow.document,c=n.createElement(‘script’);c.src=”//cd.connatix.com/connatix.player.js”,c.setAttribute(‘async’,’1′),c.setAttribute(‘type’,’text/javascript’),n.body.appendChild(c)},n.head.appendChild(t)}}(document);(new Image()).src=”https://capi.connatix.com/tr/si?token=19654b65-409c-4b38-90db-80cbdea02cf4″;cnx.cmd.push(function(){cnx({“playerId”:”19654b65-409c-4b38-90db-80cbdea02cf4″,”mediaId”:”6f363d0b-13e2-471b-bb49-05f14dbf32b4″}).render(“69c4263ee4b018d43a5a35a4”);});

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

England’s football regulator has already gone woke

Published

on

England’s football regulator has already gone woke

The post England’s football regulator has already gone woke appeared first on spiked.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025