Politics
‘I Read My Teen’s Messages And Saw Something Inappropriate’
Most children of secondary school age (we’re talking 12- to 15-year-olds) have a smartphone – and some of them will be allowed to have one on the condition they’re happy to give their device up every now and then for their parents to check.
But what happens if, during one of these checks, you spot something that makes your heart sink? And what about if your teen hasn’t given you permission to check their phone, but you’ve seen a notification flash up that’s left you worried?
It’s a minefield – and there’s no set rule for tackling this, as everyone’s situation will be different. That said, experts have shared their thoughts on how to approach this tricky moment, without causing a huge rift.
If you DO have consent to look at your child’s phone…
Counselling Directory member Bella Hird told HuffPost UK parents who have an agreement in place with their child where they can do spot checks “are in a very good starting place”.
“Think of your child’s phone a little as you would think of the world. They need your support to navigate it. There will be places and situations that, until they reach a certain age, you would not let them wander off into unsupervised,” she said.
If there’s a message on their phone that worries you, the therapist advises having a chat with your child about it: “Approach the conversation with your child with honesty and curiosity. So for example, explain ‘this kind of message really worries me and I want to know we are keeping you safe, can you explain to me a little about the context?’.”
She then urges parents to allow their child the space to explain. Try not to react in fear or anger as this will simply shut the conversation down. Punishments will simply drive a wedge further, too.

Richard Drury via Getty Images
Education and child psychologist Dr Sasha Hall said the key here is offering a calm and proportionate response, rather than punishment.
If messages involve adult or sexualised content, the psychologist said key considerations include: whether the material is age-appropriate; whether there is any risk, pressure or coercion; and whether the young person understands boundaries and consent.
“Adolescence is a stage where children need increasing autonomy and privacy compared to earlier childhood, but this should be matched with developmentally appropriate safeguards,” she added.
“The aim is not to remove independence, but to support safe decision-making while those skills are still forming.”
Bird added that it’s important to help your child understand that it is OK to make mistakes and that being open with you will ultimately end with them feeling supported with potentially difficult or dangerous scenarios.
“Explain to your child what it is about the message or what you have seen that has concerned you and ask them if they understand your worries,” she said.
“They will probably tell you there is nothing to be concerned about, in which case ask them to explain more.”
There might be times when you think your child is in danger – for example, they are being groomed – in which case, you will need to take action. Bird said “it is really important to try to take your child on that journey with you”.
She advised: “Explain to them why you are doing what you are doing it and give them as much agency as possible – so, for example, in the case that you need to involve the police, you should explain that you need to do that and why, and let them know what is likely to happen. But give them choices like ‘would you like me to explain to them or would you like to?’ and ‘who would you like with you?’
“Avoid making them feel punished or ashamed because these experiences are a real barrier to connection and collaboration. They are still learning about the world and that’s OK.”
If you DON’T have your child’s consent to look at their phone
If you don’t have your teenager’s consent to look at their phone – and you’ve done so and seen something that is cause for concern – Bird suggests asking yourself two questions.
Firstly, what is the worst thing that will happen if I address this? And secondly, what is the worst thing that will happen if I don’t address this?
“I am sure the answer to the first question involves making a teen angry and having an impact on levels of trust, but the answer to the second question is likely to make your decision to act or not pretty simple,” she added.
“When talking to your teen, take responsibility. Apologise for not being open with them about looking at their phone, but explain your reasons for doing so.”
Dr Hall noted that in this instance, repair becomes especially important.
“Acknowledging the breach of trust, explaining the concern clearly, and working together to renegotiate boundaries helps model accountability and respect,” she said.
“Repairing trust is often more impactful than the original rule-setting, as it teaches young people how relationships recover after mistakes.”
Once you have resolved the matter of concern, talk to your teen about how you will balance privacy and safety moving forward.
Dr Hall concluded: “Ultimately, phone safety is not about constant surveillance. It is about gradually teaching young people how to manage privacy, boundaries and risk online, while maintaining an open, supportive line of communication so they know they can ask for help when they need it.”
Politics
Ian McKellen Reveals The Moment He Took Aim At Trump While Filming New Marvel Movie
The taunt came while filming his character’s destruction of New Jersey, the Lord Of The Rings star told The Late Show host Stephen Colbert.
“So I’m standing up pretending to do that, the wind is blowing in my hair, I’m putting on a fierce look, I’m trying to be magnetic,” Sir Ian recalled. “And the director comes over the loudspeaker and says, ‘Ian, look more furious’.”
The Oscar nominee then asked the director if there was anything in particular that he should shout, only to be told: “Shout the worst thing you could possibly think of.”
With his arms outstretched, the actor boomed “Mar-a-Lago”, to which the studio audience erupted in cheers.
Sir Ian, who has made it clear that he is no fan of Trump, sat down and wondered aloud: “Will I be allowed back in the country?”
“Will you be allowed back in the country? No guarantees,” the talk show host, himself a fierce critic of the president, laughingly responded, adding: “I don’t think I’m the right person to ask about that.”
Watch the full interview here:
Politics
How Can I Heal From Childhood Trauma As An Adult?
Childhood trauma can have profound and lasting effects on our well-being.
Speaking to HuffPost UK, BACP-accredited integrative counsellor Nikki Howes said, “Research shows that when adversity occurs during childhood, it can shape the development of emotional regulation and threat-detection systems, leading to stress responses in adulthood that feel automatic and difficult to control”.
Other studies suggest that childhood trauma can keep people in a state of chronic stress, years after the direct threat from their youth has gone away.
BACP-accredited counsellor and author of Become The Parent You Needed, LJ Jones, added: “When difficult experiences happen early… the body and mind adapt in ways that once helped us survive; but those same patterns can later limit how safe, connected, or confident we feel as adults, and impair our mental wellness”.
Studies on adverse childhood experience (ACE) scores suggest that a childhood high in traumatic events could affect your mental and even physical health in adulthood.
But, Howes said, “I think ACE scores have often been communicated in ways that unintentionally make trauma feel inescapable.”
Here, the experts shared how to begin healing from childhood trauma, at any age.
Is it possible to heal from childhood trauma as an adult?
Although both experts noted that childhood trauma has a real impact on people’s adult lives, they also agreed that healing is possible at any age.
“Healing from childhood trauma as an adult is possible at any age because the brain and body can still learn new ways to regulate and process experiences,” Howes told us.
And, Jones said, though there is “no timeline to healing”, and while healing from trauma isn’t “linear”, “Healing from childhood trauma is possible at any age because the nervous system remains changeable throughout our lives.
“Childhood trauma can feel like a life sentence because it shapes how our nervous system learns to respond to the world… [but] high ACE scores don’t mean someone is broken or doomed.”
Though different events and experiences can trigger old wounds, she added, “the key is to have enough tools to know how to take care of ourselves”.
How can I begin to heal from childhood trauma as an adult?
“Healing isn’t about erasing the past,” Jones said, “but about owning our unique stories and helping people understand that their responses make sense and that new ways of relating to themselves and others are possible at any stage of life”.
“Trauma-informed approaches like EMDR, brainspotting, somatic therapy, and relational work help process distressing memories and build internal resources, but the trauma itself isn’t erased – we live with it differently, so it no longer drives automatic reactions and allows safety, choice, and resilience in the present.”
Jones shared that self-awareness can be a great start. Noticing “unhealthy patterns or self-sabotaging behaviours” can be a good clue as to how trauma might be showing up in our lives: “gently building new experiences of safety, regulation, and connection” can help, she said.
The pair also recommended therapy.
This can “offer a space where people feel seen and understood without judgement, sometimes for the first time,” Jones said.
“Through this process, individuals often recognise blind spots, learn to regulate overwhelming emotions, develop self-compassion, and rewrite deeply held beliefs formed in childhood, such as ‘I’m not enough’ or ‘I’m not safe.’”
The counsellor added that support, compassion, and care are key. And she highlighted “self-acceptance and empowerment within this process as they are often crucial elements which are stripped from those who suffered childhood adversities.
“Working on individual growth and celebrating small wins can help to eliminate feeling stagnant and tired of the ramifications of childhood trauma.”
Help and support:
- Mind, open Monday to Friday, 9am-6pm on 0300 123 3393.
- Samaritans offers a listening service which is open 24 hours a day, on 116 123 (UK and ROI – this number is FREE to call and will not appear on your phone bill).
- CALM (the Campaign Against Living Miserably) offer a helpline open 5pm-midnight, 365 days a year, on 0800 58 58 58, and a webchat service.
- The Mix is a free support service for people under 25. Call 0808 808 4994 or email help@themix.org.uk
- Rethink Mental Illness offers practical help through its advice line which can be reached on 0808 801 0525 (Monday to Friday 10am-4pm). More info can be found on rethink.org.
Politics
James Sweeney Interview: Twinless Director Talks Dylan O’Brien And Leaked Sex Scenes
Following rave reviews upon its release in the US towards the end of last year, which saw fans and critics celebrating its unpredictable twists, turns and deeply uncomfortable revelations, Twinless has finally made its way to UK cinemas.
At the centre of the film is the extremely impressive multi-hyphenate James Sweeney, on triple duty as the movie’s writer, director and star, alongside Dylan O’Brien in what could become a career-defining performance as a young man struggling with the aftermath of his twin brother’s death.
The film centres around Dennis and Roman, two people who strike up an immediate – and, indeed, completely codependent – friendship after meeting by chance at a bereavement group for twins who have lost their siblings.
However, as we quickly learn, things are never quite as they seem, and while Twinless is ultimately a dark comedy, it also manages to put you through a rollercoaster of emotions and twists that no one could have seen coming.
Ahead of the film’s UK release, we spoke to James about the long journey to get Twinless onto our screens, how he came to work with Dylan O’Brien, the film’s alternative ending that was pulled at the eleventh hour and how he really feels about those leaked sex scenes (and be warned, there are some spoilers ahead)…
What I wasn’t expecting about Twinless was how much it was going to remind me of those classic unhinged thrillers from the 90s – Fatal Attraction, The Hand That Rocks The Cradle, Single White Female – which I feel like are films that I could really imagine Dennis loving…?
You know what’s so funny, of those three, I’ve only seen Fatal Attraction. Single White Female is a reference that’s come up a lot for this film, and somehow, it’s escaped me.
I do love a stalker girl film, though, whether it’s Swimfan or Wicker Park. But I wouldn’t say those were overt influences.

What was the original idea for Twinless – did you want to make a film about twins, or unlikely friendships, or grief, or deception…?
I’d say the core of the story – the characters and the plot and thematics – was there from the inception. It was initially just the twin bereavement support group that was the initial kernel of the idea.
I started writing this in 2015, and I think it was more of an instinctual writing process. The biggest shift throughout the years was the structure of the film. It wasn’t always told non-chronologically, that was something that happened when I did a major rewrite in 2019, off the heels of my first film, just because you learn so much from doing a first go-around.
Dennis says early on in the film that he’s always been fascinated with twins – is that something that you can relate to?
As a child who grew up in what I believe was a generation of twin idolisation – between the Olsens, Sister Sister and The Parent Trap – there was something very fantastical, if not a bit ephemeral, about this idea of somebody who shares your face and you can share your life with, your thoughts, your clothes.
I was a military brat so I hopped around growing up, and I think there was something very appealing about that fantasy to me.
That sounds like what Dennis says in the film…?
And that is where the parallels end…

This film was greenlit immediately before the Hollywood strikes of 2023. How much was the film impacted by these delays?
We got to make exactly the film we wanted to make. It was just impeded by [the strikes].
I started working with David Permut, my producer, in 2019, and I met Dylan in 2020. It just took so long to get the financing. The deal that we had struck with Paramount, we started negotiating it a year before, in 2023, and then it just took so long to get it across the finish line.
Then, the official document signing was two weeks before the strike. That sucked [because] we were in purgatory for six months. We didn’t know what the state of the industry would be [when the strikes ended] – a lot of projects that were greenlit [around that time] fell apart, so I was just living in constant fear that this dream of mine was going to slip through my fingers. Again! Because it wasn’t the first time – Twinless had almost happened earlier, and then fell apart. This was – by far, it seemed like, the surest thing in terms of iterations of momentum, but it was terrible.
Also, my first film was released in theatres on 28 February 2020, two weeks before every theatre shut down in the United States. So, I felt like, “of course, this is my luck and timing”. So, now I’m like, “what will happen next time I make a movie?”. I feel like I’m owed a little karma.
With the film being so much about twins, and about twin bereavement, what was the research process like?
I was a research psych minor, and there are a lot of studies done on twins, so I am interested in twin psychology, and always have been. That’s part of what attracted me to this story to begin with.
But you know, being a twin, everyone has their own relationship with their twin, so I was trying to represent a [range] of [ideas] and trying to avoid tropes. So, I was talking to twin friends, reading books about twin psychology.
One takeaway, I guess, is that child rearing for the parents really affects twin relationships, because so much of twin identity is based on how much do you see yourself as an individual versus being ‘one of two’, and that really can be dependent on how much the parents encourage or discourage individuality between the two, and how much your social circle mirrors that.
Something else that I found really interesting was, especially with identical twins, there can be a very innate ease of intimacy because it’s something you’re born with. And that can put a different weight on how you approach intimacy in all relationships, and I think we see that permeate through Roman’s life and what he’s yearning for in the absence of his brother.

Have you had much feedback from actual twins?
I have! The fun thing about this film has been people who self-identify as twins and come up to me – a lot of times it’ll happen during the Q&A itself, or they’ll approach me after. I’ve had all the spectrum of reactions and it’s been… no offence to the singletons, but the twin vote is the one that means a lot to me.
When you were writing the character of Roman, what kind of actor were you envisaging, especially knowing it was someone who would also have to play Rocky, who such a completely different character?
Really, what I was looking for was somebody with a lot of versatility, and I don’t just mean in terms of physical or vocal, I also meant tonal. And that felt like such a hard thing to find.
It’s funny, I used to work in casting as my day job, and I really do believe that’s 98% of directing, and I just feel so lucky that the script landed in Dylan’s inbox and that he read it. I wasn’t 100% convinced – not that I didn’t have great admiration for him as an actor – but so much of casting is whether or not you can see it, and I initially had an easier time seeing him as Rocky than Roman.
But then meeting him was really what convinced me. He just was so clear in how he saw the character and how he expressed that to me. And that just gave me so much confidence as a filmmaker.

Did you have to give him much direction in playing a character like Rocky, who is very believably queer, without it feeling like a caricature?
You know, it was a delicate dance at first. It’s so funny now to see reactions of people being so blasé [about Dylan playing Rocky] and even about the voice that he puts on. I thought it was maybe going to be a bit more treading water a bit.
I was trying to push him in that direction without saying it fully outright. Really, all I had to do was give him permission, and then keep pushing him in that direction, but that’s all him. He’s just such a rare actor who has such a good ear for people’s voices, he does great impressions [of] people you wouldn’t think that anybody could do an impression of.
He can do it because he’s so observant and really good at capturing the essence of somebody, and I think that’s really the core of who he is as an actor, and why it doesn’t feel like he’s doing “a bit” [as Rocky] is because I think he finds a real emotional truth to the way that he accesses voice and character.
While we’re talking about Rocky, something I’m interested in is the reaction to the sex scenes, which leaked a little while before the film came out. How did you find the reaction to those, because on one hand people can be quite reductive when it comes to sex scenes – and in particular gay sex scenes. But on the other hand, they’re also really well-done scenes…
It’s a mixed bag. It’s hard because when you do a low-budget independent film, all you want is a moment that shines a light on the film. But you also want to protect the film, and you want it to be seen a certain way. And that piracy leak, it just kind of…
We didn’t know at the time how it would affect [the film’s release]… because we didn’t have distribution yet, we didn’t have the plan, we didn’t have a release date, and yeah, it just got out of our hands. And that felt really demoralising and violating.
And unfortunately, it’s still [what] a lot of people [associate with the film]. They’ve seen [the leaked scenes] and not seen the whole film, and think that they know what the film’s going to be about. Also, for me, that scene exists in a certain context. And so, it’s a lot of feelings.
Dylan kind of has encouraged me, “just stop talking about it, we’re just drawing more attention to it”, but I don’t know… I’m still wrestling with it. I do think the beauty of film is the multiple lives that it has, and I don’t know that that clip is going to be what outlasts the legacy of the film. But it wasn’t how personally I wanted it to be introduced to the world. The internet, you can’t control ’em, they’re just little children.

helsea Lauren/Shutterstock for ASTRA Awards
How far into the shoot were those scenes filmed? And did you use an intimacy coordinator?
The funny thing is, one of the first things Dylan advocated for when we met in 2020 was that he wanted to have time between [shooting his two characters’ scenes], and treat them separately, which I thought was a great idea.
At the time, I wasn’t sure we could afford this, so we really had to bend some things to make it happen, but I think it really paid off in dividends.
So, because we were waiting to see when the strikes resolved, we weren’t sure if we were going to shoot Roman first, or Rocky first. And the way it resolved, we shot Rocky right before the holidays, then used the holiday break for Dylan to put on some weight and do a visible transformation into Roman.
Rocky’s only in two and a half days of filming, so day one was the car cash, day two was the sex scene, so we started off hot and heavy – and, in retrospect, built a lot of trust really early on, and it gave us, I think, really great momentum going into the rest of principal photography.
And yes, we had two intimacy coordinators, one for that scene, and one for the other intimate scene [later in the film].
There is also another very different intimate scene later on between Dennis and Roman, involving a foot massage. How did shooting that differ to the scenes with Rocky?
We did not have a toe intimacy coordinator. It’s funny, I don’t think we ever even discussed that. We were doing a lot that day – it was a big shoot day and that was sort of the easier part of the day! The part that was really taking more brainspace [for me] was the confession. That was the most challenging thing for me in terms of compartmentalisation and juggling of my multiple responsibilities as director and performer.
There were other emotional scenes – obviously the other hotel room scene, but that one was more involved with me just reacting to his performance. And I had an easier time with that. I was also sort of rewriting the confession the day of, because I felt like I [hadn’t] quite [nailed it]… that was just a tricky one for me. And we shot the hotel room scenes back to back, because of the location.

Something I loved about Twinless is that it plays with how far you can stretch your empathy for someone, and how much you feel like you can forgive. Was that a fun concept to play with?
Oh… fun? I mean, empathy as a storyteller is my peak interest in how I approach my work. I find I’m often empathetic towards flawed characters and… I don’t know, I think that’s the beauty of film is that you get to live in the perspective of somebody you might not ever spend time with, or want to spend time with, in real life.
Throughout the years of trying to get this film made, I was aware of how people were receiving my character, which wasn’t always the most positive. If anything, I’d say the reception to the film – while not unanimous – has been less polarising than maybe we anticipated. It’s been really interesting to hear people be like “Dennis – evil” and not able to forgive him at all. And then I’ve heard other people say like, “you just can’t hate him no matter what he does!”. And I’m really getting the full spectrum of reactions. But I guess that is, to me, the fun part of it.
You’re really not sure how people are going to react, and I do think it is very much a mirror to people’s own relationship to forgiveness, and also the parts of themselves that they see reflected in Dennis, whether or not they want to admit that.
What about you, where do you fall on that spectrum?
I mean, I played with him, I’m biased. I do really care for Dennis, and I think he’s still a work in progress – which is also how I feel about myself.

Shane Anthony Sinclair via Getty Images for BFI
I also loved the ending, as a writer how hard was that to land on?
There was a different ending in the screenplay. I’d say the two scenes that both Dylan and I had discussed rewriting the most were the under-the-covers scene with Rocky, which establishes the emotional stakes of the film, and the final scene in the diner. I always felt that could be where the film needed to end, and that’s what revealed itself to be the case when we were in post.
Also, I think we intentionally scheduled the diner to be one of the final days of filming, because we thought just the process of making this film might inform how we feel going into that. And it did, and I’m really glad we gave ourselves that gift. Speaking for myself and Dylan, we’re both really happy where we landed with the ending.
So, the original ending in the screenplay would have continued past that point…?
Yeah, there was a different scene. I think maybe one day I’ll reveal it, but [for now] I kind of just want the film to exist as it is.
Finally, how do you follow something like Twinless that you spent so many years working on?
I kind of want to keep making films that I want to see. I have a lot of ideas, so I feel very fortunate to be in a position where people are excited to see what I do next.
And I don’t think it will be like Twinless. I’m trying not to think about what people are expecting or not expecting from me, and just focus on telling a story that feels meaningful to me.
Twinless is in cinemas now.
Politics
Professor Reacts To Jacob Elordi’s Wuthering Heights Casting
Oscar-winning filmmaker Emerald Fennell’s decision to cast Jacob Elordi as Heathcliff in her new adaptation of Wuthering Heights movie has proven controversial since it was first announced.
Some have accused the director of “whitewashing” the character, who is alternately speculated to have Romani, Spanish, Indian, and American heritage in the original book.
In the novel, Heathcliff is described as “dark-skinned”, and whatever his actual ethnicity may be, his background is constantly discussed in the novel.
Responding to the backlash, Fennell recently shared that she picked Elordi for the role because “he looked exactly like the illustration of Heathcliff on the first book that I read”, adding in another interview: “You can only ever kind of make the movie that you sort of imagined yourself when you read it”.
After the controversy, I read the book to see for myself how race appeared in the novel, and was struck by just how often it was brought up. So, I asked nineteenth-century literature professor, Dr Josephine McDonagh, for her thoughts on the casting controversy.
How is Heathcliff’s race described in the book Wuthering Heights?
But Dr McDonagh thinks this is unlikely.
“The novel is highly invested in racial differences, and the text makes clear that the possibilities of human darkness for Brontë far exceed the commonplace idea that Brontë just meant a variation of whiteness,” she told HuffPost UK (it should also be noted that the Roma can be considered their own ethnic group).
“Race is a huge preoccupation in the novel (and all the Brontës’ novels, for that matter),” she added.
Even as girls, the professor pointed out, the Brontë sisters played games based on an imagined world set in West Africa.
“In their imaginations, they divided up the continent between the four of them, and had their own colonies, with some native people in them. It’s really not right to claim that they weren’t thinking about race in quite sophisticated ways.”
This does not, however, mean that we definitely know what Heathcliff’s race was “meant” to be. His perceived racial identity shifts often in the novel: he’s othered along racial lines, but that “otherness” isn’t ever strictly given one name.
So, Dr McDonagh told us this in the novel, his race is “undecidable”.
Is he definitely non-white? “Maybe, maybe not. That’s the way novels work! But the suggestion is definitely there.”
What about the Wuthering Heights film casting?
Of course, movie adaptations don’t have to be faithful to the source material, and Fennell has said she deliberately put the title of her film in quotation marks on the poster and promo materials because she “couldn’t ever hope to make anything that could even encompass the greatness of this book”.
For her part, the professor told us: “I don’t think that the new movie should have cast Heathcliff as Black, but I do think it would be a loss if it doesn’t negotiate the question of race in some way.
“Especially these days, when race is discussed so frequently and so explicitly.”
She added that, personally, she’s not the biggest fan of what she’s seen from the movie’s trailer. The literature professor added that she thinks Andrea Arnold’s 2011 film adaptation of the novel, which cast James Howson as Heathcliff in one of the rare cases a Black actor has portrayed the character on screen, is “terrific – when I first saw it, the casting was a surprise, and it was really impressive”.
Incidentally, months before the new Wuthering Heights cast and director were announced, Vulture described the 2011 flick as “the horny, twisted romance Saltburn [another Fennell project] wishes it was”.
“I think it unlikely that the new adaptation will dislodge Arnold’s movie,” Professor McDonagh continued.
Politics
Mandelson invokes ‘grieving family’ rules to dodge Epstein scrutiny
Disgraced former minister, peer and key Starmer adviser Peter Mandelson has tried to exploit editors’ code clauses usually reserved for grieving families to demand freedom from media scrutiny over his ardent relationship with serial child-rapist Jeffrey Epstein. It hasn’t worked out too well.
Mandelson told a representative to contact mainstream press pseudo-regulator IPSO invoking clauses in its editors’ code intended to protect grieving families and other vulnerable people from harassment by pushy reporters. And he tried to keep it secret, marking it “strictly not for publication”. But it came out anyway, after the National saw the public interest in publishing it. The notice was not sent to Skwawkbox or the Canary, which are properly regulated — and not by IPSO — so there are no issues with publishing it here.
Read IPSO’s communication to ‘mainstream’ editors on Mandelson’s demand in full below:
CONFIDENTIAL – STRICTLY NOT FOR PUBLICATION: Ipso has asked us to circulate the following advisory:
Ipso has today been contacted by a representative acting on behalf of Peter Mandelson.
Mr Mandelson’s representatives state that he does not wish to speak to the media at this time. He requests that the press do not take photos or film, approach, or contact him via phone, email, or in-person. His representatives ask that any requests for his comment are directed to [REDACTED]
We are happy to make editors aware of his request. We note the terms of Clause 2 (Privacy) and 3 (Harassment) of the Editors’ Code, and in particular that Clause 3 states that journalists must not persist in questioning, telephoning, pursuing or photographing individuals once asked to desist, unless justified in the public interest.
Please do not hesitate to contact me to discuss any Code issues on [REDACTED] or out of hours on [REDACTED].
If this cowardly ‘hide behind the vulnerable’ tactic looks familiar, it’s because it is. Yesterday, Keir Starmer hid behind Epstein’s victims to avoid disclosing documents showing just how much he knew (lots) about Mandelson’s closeness to Epstein, Mandelson’s insider trading with the paedophile and his leaking of sensitive government information.
Mandelson has mentored both Keir Starmer and Starmer’s chief of staff Morgan McSweeney. It shows. On Friday, 6 February, Mandelson’s properties were raided by police investigating his actions. If there’s any justice, the same will soon be true of his two protégés.
Featured image via the Canary
Politics
The Epstein scandal is taking down Europe’s political class. In the US, they’re getting a pass.
Across the Atlantic, heads are rolling over the Jeffrey Epstein revelations.
In Norway, one prominent diplomat has already been suspended and a police investigation has been opened into a former prime minister. In the U.K., the former ambassador to the U.S. has been fired; on Tuesday, he resigned from the House of Lords. Police are reviewing reports he shared market-sensitive information with Epstein.
Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, formerly known as Prince Andrew, was stripped of his royal titles and residence. A charity founded by his ex-wife Sarah Ferguson, the former Duchess of York, will shut down indefinitely following the release of emails where she called Epstein a “legend” and “the brother I have always wished for.”
But as Europe’s political class moves to clean up its mess and address its shame concerning ties with the convicted sex offender, it’s inadvertently highlighting something else — the comparative lack of accountability in the U.S.
No prominent politicians have taken a fall. Consequences have been limited. Wagons have been circled around the most prominent political figures whose names have surfaced in the legal document dumps.
In the U.K., former ambassador to the U.S. Peter Mandelson — who has said he was wrong to believe Epstein following his conviction and to continue his association with him afterwards — has emerged as a millstone around British Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s neck. While Starmer never actually met Epstein, some are calling for his resignation over his appointment of Mandelson. The prime minister publicly apologized Thursday to Epstein’s victims.
“I am sorry,” Starmer said. “Sorry for what was done to you, sorry that so many people with power failed you, sorry for having believed Mandelson’s lies and appointed him and sorry that even now you’re forced to watch this story unfold in public once again.”
It’s a different story in the U.S. Donald Trump’s Republican Party has largely averted its eyes or rallied to the president’s defense despite his documented ties to Epstein and the unverified additional allegations against the president that appeared last week.
Trump has denied wrongdoing in relation to the Epstein allegations, and no evidence has suggested that he took part in Epstein’s trafficking operation. The president also has maintained that he and Epstein had a falling out years ago.
Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick remains unscathed in his Cabinet post. Lutnick said on a podcast last year that he was so disgusted by his neighbor Epstein in 2005 that he vowed to never be in the same room with him again. But when the Justice Department released more than three million pages of materials related to the late American financier last Friday, emails surfaced suggesting a closer relationship and that Lutnick had actually seen Epstein some years later on a trip to Epstein’s Caribbean island. A spokesperson said the Commerce secretary “had limited interactions with Mr. Epstein in the presence of his wife and has never been accused of wrongdoing.” So far, there are no signs it affected his standing in the Trump Cabinet.
Likewise, Goldman Sachs and its CEO David Solomon have stood shoulder-to-shoulder with the company’s general counsel Kathryn Ruemmler as she’s faced brutal headlines for months for her associations with Epstein, which include gifts of a $9,400 Hermes bag and a spa treatment at the Four Seasons Hotel in D.C. Solomon told the Wall Street Journal several weeks ago that Ruemmler, a former White House counsel to Barack Obama, “is widely respected and admired at the firm.”
Ruemmler has said she regrets “ever knowing him, and I have enormous sympathy for the victims of Epstein’s crimes.”
Even Dr. Peter Attia, the author and influential longevity researcher who is a contributor to CBS News, remains on the job despite his appearance in numerous emails with Epstein, where they discussed female genitalia and how Epstein’s life was “so outrageous.” In an email that he posted on X, Attia apologized and said he was not involved in any criminal activity, his interactions with Epstein had nothing to do with his sexual abuse or exploitation of anyone and that he was never on his plane or island, and never present at any sex parties.
Some see the relatively limited fallout — in a public arena where infidelity or even smoking marijuana were once enough to sink a career — as a reflection of the diminished standards of the Trump era, when the president’s own indiscretions and extreme polarization has led to a greater tolerance of the scent of scandal. They point to the Cabinet nominations of former Rep. Matt Gaetz of Florida and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, both of whom would have been unthinkable in the past given allegations about their involvement in sex crimes that both men have denied.
“Some of that has to do with the general chaos on this side of the pond where it’s a never ending stream of scandal emanating from 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue and Trump has set a tone of defiance on refusal to accept and feel any shame,” said Norm Eisen, a former U.S. ambassador to the Czech Republic who is now a top Trump critic and the founder of Democracy Defenders Action, a bipartisan group that tracks what it calls “autocratic” behavior by the administration. “Those who should feel shame are hunkering down instead.”
It’s true that several American figures linked to Epstein have been forced to step away from public life. They include former Treasury Secretary Larry Summers, who has said he is “deeply ashamed of my actions and recognize the pain they have caused,” and Paul Weiss chairman Brad Karp, who resigned as the law firm’s chair on Wednesday saying it’s in the best interest of the firm. David Ross, former director of the Whitney Museum of American Art, stepped down this week from his position at a Manhattan art school and said in a statement that he felt ashamed for falling for Epstein’s lies. But for many of the best-known elites who were in contact with the late convicted sex offender — including former Trump aide Steve Bannon and billionaire tech mogul Elon Musk — the only consequence has been the reputational hit.
“What matters is not release of some subset of the Epstein files, but rather the prosecution of those who committed heinous crimes with Epstein,” Musk wrote on X. “When there is at least one arrest, some justice will have been done. If not, this is all performative. Nothing but a distraction.”
Bannon has said little publicly about their relationship, but he did previously call for an independent investigation into the files.
Bannon, a frequent visitor to Epstein’s New York house, was planning a documentary to help revive Epstein’s image and even was texting documentary scheduling questions with Epstein the day he was arrested in 2019. Even so, there are few outward signs that the scandal has touched him: Bannon still does his “War Room” show on Rumble and his political musings are widely covered in the press.
It’s an approach in keeping with Trump’s own never-concede-an-inch style.
“We as Americans need to be looking at ourselves in the mirror. Why are we not having that same reaction [as Europe]?” said Rufus Gifford, a former Obama-appointed ambassador to Denmark. “Without a doubt how Trump has acted has filtered down to broader society. But I think the question that we have to ask is whether or not this existed before Trump, and Trump is just a symptom of that larger problem.”
Politics
Disgraced Jeremy Kyle is training Reform UK candidates
Well, Nigel Farage has officially lost the plot. The Reform UK leader has just revealed that Jeremy Kyle – the poverty-porn mogul – has a secret role within the party. Hilariously, he’s media training Reform’s candidates.
Jeremy Kyle lol, one of the most hated TV presenters of all time.
Well, expect reform politicians to bully their opponents until they top themselves. pic.twitter.com/apaxqRVLzL
— Inevitable Pinky 🐡🏳️🌈🇬🇧🇬🇱🇪🇺 (@BpdLion) February 5, 2026
Jeremy Kyle: a legacy of exploitation
Jeremy Kyle spent a ridiculous 14 years shouting through our TV screens. He put vulnerable people on show for the world to see, and he laughed at them.
ITV finally took The Jeremy Kyle Show off air in 2019 when Steve Dymond took his own life after failing a lie detector test. Kyle’s legacy is one of cruelty and death.
Never forget: Jeremy Kyle built his career on screaming at vulnerable people, getting addicts drunk, parading them in front of a jeering audience, then hiding behind a lie detector. Some of those people took their own lives. To describe him as despicable doesn’t even cover it. pic.twitter.com/Rew922MCez
— Vit (@vitt2tsnoc) October 8, 2025
A full eighteen years ago, a judge described the show as ‘human bear-baiting’ after a violent incident unfolded on the show. Kyle built his empire by kicking down on people who are on a low income; people who are suffering with addiction, and people facing mental health crises.
Yep, sounds like the right man to help Reform reclaim the UK:
This footage of The Jeremy Kyle Show is a stark reminder of how he ruthlessly exploited vulnerable people for ratings. It highlights just how irresponsible and cruel his approach was. Good riddance to this kind of ‘poverty porn’pic.twitter.com/l9Jy4UWxCs
— Charlie Watts (@char1iewatts) September 5, 2024
Reform’s a magnet for scandal, just like his show
Jeremy Kyle seems to fit right in with a party surrounded by scandals. It seems like Reform UK have an issue with having to drop candidates for shitty behaviour:
Can you see a pattern here? Kyle fits right in, it seems:
🚨Jeremy Kyle is FURIOUS with how illegal immigrants are treated better than the British people 🇬🇧
“I don’t care if they get rid of me for saying this”
Everybody HAS HAD ENOUGH of free loading fake asylum seekers who are put before us at every turn ⚠️ pic.twitter.com/9Gee97h7hI
— BRITAIN IS BROKEN 🇬🇧 (@BROKENBRITAIN0) January 26, 2026
The perfect home for Kyle
The right-wing Talk TV helped Jeremy Kyle reboot his career. The channel performs a similar function to GB News, which Reform UK are intimately entwined with:
As usual with @Nigel_Farage when he’s told he must fall in line he falls in line.
On his GB News show two nights ago he continued to spread the unfounded and frankly ludicrous theory that Epstein was a Russian agent all along.
This is how controlled opposition operations work. pic.twitter.com/wg5bLdV5We
— Wolf 🐺 (@WorldByWolf) February 6, 2026
Ladies and gentlemen.
I present to you:
Mr Lee Anderson MP dressed up as a warlock, bleeding from his head, making serious political comment on GB News.
I feel as though I need say no more…
😬 pic.twitter.com/j50jH5ddmr— Sir Michael Take CBE (@MichaelTakeMP) November 1, 2025
Bringing Kyle into the fold is a transparent attempt to woo the demographic he spent over a decade mocking. They assume our memories are that short.
If Reform UK wants voters to take them seriously, hiring the king of poverty-porn is a fucking funny way to show it.
Do we really want the man who monetised human misery to be training what could be our future MPs?
Featured image via Gage Skidmore (Wikimedia)
Politics
Jewish Chronicle says more antisemitism now than WW2
The European Legal Support Center (ELSC) has posted a peer-reviewed study which shows a ‘dramatic escalation’ in the Jewish Chronicle (JC) crying antisemitism. The JC is a right-wing British newspaper with a history of having to make public retractions. Now, the ELSC have shown that the JC alleges antisemitism more often today than it did in 1938 (i.e. during the era of Nazi Germany).
These findings confirm widespread views that the JC uses the very real trauma of antisemitism to shield Israel. Furthermore, the findings provide evidence of how the hostile state and its Zionist supporters operate. They’re using false antisemitism accusations to shut down the global protests supporting Palestinian liberation.
This is hardly a surprise. Obviously the Zionists and their colonialist buddies would want to use the victim-card to deflect from Israel’s genocide. And the more war crimes Israel commits, the more they have to double down on the smears.
Our upcoming Britain Index of Repression documents the resulting patterns of repression across all sectors of society, revealing the institutionalised criminalisation of Palestine solidarity.
The consequences are real: careers derailed, students investigated, people referred to… pic.twitter.com/zoATHq5DqR
— European Legal Support Center (ELSC) (@elsclegal) February 5, 2026
The ELSC will release the full report on 26 February.
Jewish Chronicle — ‘Zionist notion of antisemitism’
The ELSC’s analysis covered 100-years of the JC‘s output. The hate-rag is well known for churning out potentially career-ending allegations against activists, politicians, creatives, and other professionals. The ELSC concluded that the Jewish Chronicle deliberately uses a ‘Zionist notion of antisemitism’ to stir up a moral panic intent on diminishing solidarity with Palestinians. As a result, the ELSC have concluded that the pro-Israel paper plays an active role in the UK in working to repress support for Palestine liberation.
Below are just a couple of the pages showing findings of the peer-reviewed analysis by Professor Neve Gordon:

Michael Rosen, the beloved Jewish author and poet, has often spoken out against the alleged antisemitism crisis created by Zionists. Pointing to the Labour Party, Rosen recently stated:
At the height of the claim that the Labour Party was riven with antisemitism and/or institutionally antisemitic, I pursued a theory as follows: ‘If people are combatting antisemitism only in the Labour Party and not in the Tory Party, they’re not combatting antisemitism, they’re combatting the Labour Party’.
To expand that slightly, I was in effect saying that it’s hard to take such people’s definition of antisemitism seriously if it’s only directed at people in one organisation.
Rosen further added:
Could it be, I wonder, that my theory – as expressed above – could in any way be possibly slightly true? Could it be that some kind of double standard or two-tier policing of antisemitism had been and perhaps still is in place?
False victimisation: real abuse against Palestinians
The Zionist fury over the recent Fitton 6 acquittal underscores how Israel’s protection drives these allegations. The defendants faced trial for their anti-genocide efforts as part of now-proscribed Palestine Action, a non-violent direct-action group. Nevertheless, the trial and subsequent acquittal by jury has led to yet more allegations of antisemitism. Seemingly, the intent now is to label the UK’s criminal justice system as ‘antisemitic’. Our own Skwawkbox wrote:
Of course we must never forget that Israel and its lobby are always the victim. Even when they’re slaughtering innocent Palestinians and making up bollocks in court to imprison people trying to stop them.
We all know the story of the “boy who cried wolf”. It’s crucial that allegations of antisemitism come from genuine instances, or we risk exposing Jews to a backlash from people who equate Judaism with Zionism.
As we’ve reported, such a backlash is already happening within the American right. Over there, prominent figures like Nick Fuentes openly arguing that Israel has made a mockery of America, and that the correct response to this is antisemitism. We can’t let such bigotry fester over here.
It’s also crucial that Muslims and others are able to speak freely of their support for Palestine without fear of being harassed by the media.
Featured image via Facebook
Politics
Umer Khalid’s family “terrified for his life” and still unable to visit
Political prisoner Umer Khalid, one of 24 ‘Filton 24’ prisoners jailed for up to 19 months and counting for opposing genocide, ended his hunger strike last month. His decision came after prison authorities agreed to review the punitive conditions in which he is being held. These included banning his religious observance and restricting visits.
But his family say little or nothing has changed and they’re still being blocked from seeing him. In fact, it’s worse than before as he’s now deprived of meetings with his lawyer.
Umer Khalid: desperate situation
In a statement, they asked supporters not to call or visit the prison or risk anything outside “formal routes” that his family is pursuing. However, they say they can no longer remain silent over Umer Khalid’s situation as they are “terrified for [his] life”:
For now, we please request that nobody calls into the prison, tries to locate Umer, or escalates this beyond the formal routes being followed by Umer’s legal team. Updates with actions you can take will follow as they are received.
We’ve stayed silent long enough, but now I’m terrified for my son’s life. My son has been on remand for seven months. During this time, we have had daily contact. After a 17-day hunger strike and four days without water, he was hospitalised on Monday, 26 January.
Since then, the prison has kept him incommunicado. We have had zero contact for over 10 days now. They are blocking him from his family and, alarmingly, from his solicitor.
A mother should not have to wonder whether her son is alive or dead while he is in state care. Access to his solicitor and contact with his family are basic human rights — especially during a medical crisis. We are demanding answers and the right to hear his voice. Please share this and amplify our voices. We cannot let him be forgotten in that hospital bed.
The Starmer regime’s political persecution of the Filton humanitarians has been further exposed and disgraced recently by the refusal of a jury to convict the first six to go on trial on any of the trumped-up charges against them. The trial exposed the lies of the state and of arms manufacturer Elbit to smear and criminalise them.
Yet despite this, the regime continues to hold the others – and even one of those acquitted – in prison without trial. This is as clear a case as could be of ‘making the process the punishment’ and Starmer wants to end jury trials to withhold justice. All of this is to protect Israel and its ethno-fascist genocide.
Enough is enough. It’s long past time for Starmer’s authoritarianism and collaboration in genocide to end. He and his cronies are the ones who should be behind bars.
Featured image via the Canary
Politics
TrumpRx only serves the rich to distract from him being a rapist
Keen to divert attention away from the fact he’s a massive fucking pedo, Donald Trump announced a new drugs initiative yesterday. TrumpRx will apparently give users “the world’s lowest prices on prescription drugs”. However, as with most of the pervert in chief’s plans, this will benefit very few average Americans.
TrumpRx is too good to be true
TrumpRx is a direct-to-consumer marketplace that gives discounted drug prices direct from manufacturers. This is done using Most Favoured Nation pricing. This basically ensures a consumer gets the product at the lowest possible price in other countries. Customers get a coupon card which they can take to participating pharmacies.
The prices listed for drugs are, by all accounts, huge discounts, anything from 33-93% off. But as a British person, it also brings into stark focus just how much disabled Americans are expected to pay per month for vital medication. What do you fucking mean it’s five hundred dollars a month for an asthma inhaler?!
There is, however, of course, a catch. The discounted drugs can only be purchased in cash. This means only those who can afford to buy the medication in the first place can access it. Most sick and disabled citizens rely on health insurance or government schemes such as Medicaid to afford their sky-high medication.
It’s also not clear yet whether buying these drugs in cash will count towards health insurance deductibles in the way that traditional prescribing will. Which means patients could be shelling out what they think is a lower price every month, whilst facing higher-than-usual insurance bills.
This means that, once again, while Trump is appearing to help all Americans, he’s only serving the wealthy few.
Trump stretching the truth again
The TrumpRX site boasts
Thanks to President Trump, the days of Big Pharma price-gouging are over. Leveraging the full weight and power of the United States of America, the President has ensured every American gets the lowest prices on prescription medications in the developed world.
This is, however, not true. According to Peterson-KFF Health System Tracker analysis, four other countries sell Ozempic for less than the $100 TrumpRx is boasting. These are also the manufacturer prices – not what the consumer often actually ends up paying. TrumpRx also has to warn that those with insurance could actually end up paying more than usual.
CNN pointed out that some of the medications listed are already available at the discounted prices Trump is bragging about
For instance, GoodRx lists multiple pharmacies where consumers can pick up Pfizer’s Duavee, which is used to treat menopause symptoms, for $30.30 without insurance – the same price as on TrumpRx.
This isn’t even Trump’s idea, as many pharmacies and manufacturers already do this. As CNN also points out, Mark Cuban has been running Cost Plus Drug since 2022. Pharmaceutical company Novo Nordisk also has NovoCare, and Eli Lilly has Lilly Direct.
TrumpRx could drive up the drive of medication for those who need it most
There’s also the fact that you don’t require a prescription to purchase the drugs on TrumpRx. With a huge array of very popular and profitable drugs on offer, it could drive up the price for those who desperately need them. This could particularly be true in the case of Ozempic and other “weight loss” drugs, which are actually vital diabetes medications.
There are also fears that with these drugs being readily available at “knock-down” prices, greedy insurance companies might stop covering them. After all, if the government is claiming they’re cheap, you don’t need insurance for them, surely.
Stacie Dusetzina, a health policy professor at Vanderbilt University Medical Center told a briefing hosted by KFF [also in the CNN article linked]
Even when you have very large discounts provided for brand-name drugs, they still end up with prices that are not really that affordable to the average person. We know from research that once a price goes above about $100 a month, that a lot of people stop filling their drugs at that price point.
Let’s face it – Trump doesn’t serve the average American
The fact of the matter is, this won’t make much difference to those actually struggling with the costs of medications. It won’t do anything to ease the pressures of sick and disabled Americans who have to fight with insurance companies and their own government to get the medication they need to survive.
But it will once again benefit the rich, because let’s not forget who Trump really cares about.
Featured image via the Canary
-
Video4 days agoWhen Money Enters #motivation #mindset #selfimprovement
-
Tech3 days agoWikipedia volunteers spent years cataloging AI tells. Now there’s a plugin to avoid them.
-
Politics5 days agoSky News Presenter Criticises Lord Mandelson As Greedy And Duplicitous
-
Crypto World7 days agoU.S. government enters partial shutdown, here’s how it impacts bitcoin and ether
-
Sports6 days agoSinner battles Australian Open heat to enter last 16, injured Osaka pulls out
-
Crypto World7 days agoBitcoin Drops Below $80K, But New Buyers are Entering the Market
-
Tech11 hours agoFirst multi-coronavirus vaccine enters human testing, built on UW Medicine technology
-
Sports3 hours agoJD Vance booed as Team USA enters Winter Olympics opening ceremony
-
Crypto World5 days agoMarket Analysis: GBP/USD Retreats From Highs As EUR/GBP Enters Holding Pattern
-
Sports21 hours ago
New and Huge Defender Enter Vikings’ Mock Draft Orbit
-
NewsBeat17 hours agoSavannah Guthrie’s mother’s blood was found on porch of home, police confirm as search enters sixth day: Live
-
Business2 days agoQuiz enters administration for third time
-
NewsBeat4 days agoUS-brokered Russia-Ukraine talks are resuming this week
-
Sports5 days agoShannon Birchard enters Canadian curling history with sixth Scotties title
-
NewsBeat5 days agoGAME to close all standalone stores in the UK after it enters administration
-
NewsBeat2 days agoStill time to enter Bolton News’ Best Hairdresser 2026 competition
-
NewsBeat4 hours agoDriving instructor urges all learners to do 1 check before entering roundabout
-
Crypto World3 days agoRussia’s Largest Bitcoin Miner BitRiver Enters Bankruptcy Proceedings: Report
-
NewsBeat4 days agoImages of Mamdani with Epstein are AI-generated. Here’s how we know
-
Crypto World2 days agoHere’s Why Bitcoin Analysts Say BTC Market Has Entered “Full Capitulation”
