Politics
PETA again calls out uni over ‘cruel and pointless’ mice experiments
Attendees at the Queen Mary University of London (QMUL) Postgraduate Open Day Event had a more memorable experience than expected on 18 February. A group of PETA supporters stormed the famous Octagon inside the Queens’ Building bearing signs that read, “QMUL: End Cruel Sepsis Experiments,” and chanting, “Sepsis experiments should be cruelty free.”
Cruel experiments
The action is part of PETA’s ongoing campaign calling on the university to stop tormenting mice in cruel and useless sepsis experiments, which consistently fail to lead to effective treatments for humans. Activists previously crashed a meeting of the QMUL Senate to draw the attention of university leadership.
PETA senior campaigns manager Kate Werner said:
Prospective QMUL students should know that the university is using their tuition fees to torture and kill terrified mice in cruel and pointless experiments that have done nothing to advance human health.
PETA urges QMUL to stop wasting animals’ lives on these cruel experiments and switch to cutting-edge, animal-free research that actually helps humans.
More than 150 drugs have successfully treated sepsis in mice, yet none have been effective in treating humans. Despite the well-documented failure in using mice to model human sepsis, QMUL experiments are cutting open terrified mice and puncturing their intestines to leak faecal matter into their bodies.
Experimenters noted that some mice experienced severe sepsis, which can include major organ failure and abject suffering. Data from some of these experiments has been published in papers that were later retracted by the publisher because data and conclusions were deemed ‘unreliable’.
Mice are intelligent, complex, and social individuals who experience a wide range of emotions. They become attached to each other, love their families, and easily bond with their human guardians – returning as much affection as they receive.
PETA encourages everyone to urge Queen Mary to heed the scientific evidence and join other institutions, including the University of Kent, that have committed to non-animal methods in sepsis research.
PETA – whose motto reads, in part, that “animals are not ours to experiment on” – points out that Every Animal Is Someone and offers free Empathy Kits. For more information, visit PETA.org.uk or follow PETA on X, Facebook, or Instagram.
Featured image via PETA
Politics
2028 Dem veteran? Uncle Sam wants you.
In the 15 days since President Donald Trump launched Operation Epic Fury on Iran, Sen. Ruben Gallego (D-Ariz.) is approaching nearly a dozen media appearances, offering his often visceral reaction to the conflict.
Gallego, a 46-year-old combat veteran who deployed to Iraq as an infantryman in 2005, has emerged as a blunt, clear voice for the Democratic Party on foreign policy, speaking as someone whose own generation experienced the forever wars.
There he was on CNN’s “The Source with Kaitlin Collins” saying Secretary of State Marco Rubio was doing “CYA” and noting that the “MAGA base is pissed.” There he was sitting down with the AP speaking “as someone who lives with PTSD,” adding “it’s not been an easy week.” And there he was on Derek Thompson’s podcast, speaking about “going town to town searching for insurgents” 21 years ago, “but there was no clear direction of what victory looked like, what the end goal was, what was going to be the after-action report on Iraq.”
Gallego isn’t alone. Sen. Mark Kelly (D-Ariz.), a Navy captain who flew combat missions during Operation Desert Storm in 1990, has also racked up a run of high-profile media appearances, as has former Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg, a U.S. Navy Reserve intelligence officer who deployed to Afghanistan. Maryland Gov. Wes Moore, who served in Afghanistan in the Army’s 82nd Airborne, went on local radio this week to link Americans’ affordability woes to the war.
In a year after many Democrats pined for a metaphorical fighter, the party is now having a conversation with itself about whether it needs a literal fighter — a veteran who can speak with credibility on issues of war and national security.
In an interview with POLITICO, Gallego spoke of “dodging bullets, IEDs, RPGs, clearing towns and then coming back to the same towns with insurgents” and of “losing friends and still not understanding what the end goal was the whole time.”
“It leaves a mark on you, and you start seeing it happening again, you know, you don’t really think about the politics,” Gallego said. “You think about the people who are going to be potentially dying. And that’s why I think I was not hesitant to speak my mind on that.”
Later this month in San Antonio, Texas, Gallego will join VoteVets Action for its third town hall featuring potential 2028 Democratic presidential candidates, promising “fresh voices to the national conversation — those who have worn the uniform and served alongside us, who connect with everyday Americans others can’t,” according to a promotional video. (They’ve also done town halls with Buttigieg and Michigan Sen. Elissa Slotkin.)
“On foreign policy, the Dems need a candidate who is seen as strong/tough — not in rhetoric or bravado political platitudes but who conveys a sense of judgement and resolve with which voters connect instinctively,” said Doug Wilson, the former assistant secretary of Defense for Public Affairs during the Obama administration and co-lead of Buttigieg’s 2020 foreign policy team.
The “Iran war underscores the need” for such a candidate, Wilson added.
Whomever the Democrats select as their nominee could potentially face a Situation Room-steeped ticket deep with national security credentials, including a Marine Iraq war veteran in Vice President JD Vance or Rubio, with his secretary of State experience.
Depending on how the many conflicts the U.S. is engaged in at the moment resolve, that experience could cut against them.
But right now, Democrats who can match those bona fides have some currency others without them can’t.
“That’s obviously going to be helpful to them,” said Matt Bennett, co-founder of the center-left think tank Third Way. “It’s gonna be a big part of what they’re talking about for the next little while. But you know, how long does it last? We just don’t know, right? In my professional lifetime, foreign policy stuff and national security has mattered in a presidential race once — in 2004. That’s it. Otherwise, it comes up, but it’s not driving the conversation.”
Some potential Democratic candidates without such credentials have still managed to break through amid the Iran news cycle. Sen. Jon Ossoff (D-Ga.) has said the White House has treated aspects of the war “as a video game,” in a clip gaining traction on X. “When American service members killed in action are returning to the United States in flagged-draped coffins, and even more Americans have lost limbs or suffered terrible brain injuries or are fighting for their lives, this White House treats war like a game, and it’s a disgrace,” Ossoff said.
When asked whether military service is an essential for the party’s eventual nominee, Gallego acknowledged there is a benefit for someone who can “speak with that type of credibility.”
“I’m not the type of person that’s like, ‘you have to be a veteran — Iraq War veteran,’” Gallego said. “This is a democracy. We’re still one, and there’s a lot of people that can bring valuable experience and knowledge. But you know, someone that actually has a nuanced understanding of foreign policy; that doesn’t go to the total knee-jerk reactionism that sometimes we see where we go to the point of, you know, isolationism; or the other way, where we go to full neocon. There needs to be a very balanced way to how we approach the world.”
Like this content? Consider signing up for POLITICO’s Playbook newsletter.
Politics
Israel murders medics in Lebanese hospital strike
Israel’s war-criminal tactics of the Gaza genocide and its war of aggression on Iran have been inflicted on Lebanon last night, 13 March 2026. The colony, which has slaughtered almost 700 Lebanese civilians and forcibly displaced around a million people, has bombed a health centre in the south of Lebanon. At least twelve medical workers were murdered, though more are still unaccounted for.
The bombing, on the village of Burj Qalaouiyah in the Bint Jbeil district, killed doctors, paramedics and nurses on duty at the health facility. As scant cover for its crimes, the occupation has issued unsubstantiated claims that Lebanese resistance forces are using ambulances for transport:
As usual with the terror state, every accusation is a confession: Israel used two Lebanese ambulances to infiltrate the Bekaa Valley on 8 March to massacre more than forty people.
The attack mirrored Israeli tactics of destroying health facilities relied on by its victims. Israel destroyed or badly damaged every hospital in Gaza and frequently targeted ambulances. It launched its illegal war on Iran with the bombing of hospitals, as well as the murder of close to 180 girls studying at their school in Minab.
Israel killed Lebanese Dr. Hisham Ismail today in south Lebanon.
Israeli occupation forces committed another massacre against paramedics and doctors after bombing a medical center and clinic belonging to the Islamic Health Authority in the town of Bourj Qalawayh, southern… pic.twitter.com/LgFrBiCFqd
— Pheebs (@galpalpheebs) March 13, 2026
The deadly attack on Burj Qalaouiyah was the second Israeli murder of health workers in just a few hours. Israel bombed a paramedics’ centre in Souaneh village, killing two paramedics and wounding five others.
Israel is a terror state. And any support for it is collaboration in its racist crimes.
Featured image via the Canary
Politics
Call for banks to chip in and protect UK from “Trumpflation”
The Trades Union Congress (TUC) has renewed its calls for an increase in the bank surcharge tax. This comes as UK households and firms face the effects of “Trumpflation”.
The bank surcharge is an additional 3% corporation tax on the profits of banking companies exceeding £100m. In April 2023 the Conservatives reduced it to this level from 8%.
With Donald Trump’s illegal war unleashing economic chaos, the union body says it’s vital that banks play their part in any efforts to protect the economy by paying their fair share in tax.
The longer the war goes on, the more likely support for households and industry will be necessary. And that will require funding.
The TUC says working people are facing the impact of the Trump-made cost of living crisis. And it urges the government to pull out all the stops to protect households and firms.
The union body adds that banks must play their part in rebuilding Britain and funding our public services like schools, hospitals and local councils.
City of London fat cats
The call comes as analysis reveals City bonuses have reached record levels as banks continue to enjoy sky high profits.
In 2025 the average bonus in the finance and insurance sector was £20,300 – the first time it has topped £20,000. City bonuses grew 6.3% in 2025, which represented the highest growth for three years.
For the economy as a whole, total bonuses in the City amounted to £23.6bn in 2025. Again, this is the highest figure on record.
Using the latest HMRC corporation tax receipt figures, the TUC estimates bank profits were £35.2bn in 2024-25. Over the last three years profits have averaged £36.5bn. This is 57% higher than the average of profits in the three years ahead of the global financial crisis (£23.2bn).
Time for action on banks
The TUC is calling for an increase in the bank surcharge, which it says could raise significant funds over the coming years. Particularly given the scale of banks’ current windfalls,
Bank profits have been turbocharged by the removal of the bank surcharge. And this has come just as high interest rates meant excess profits for banks. Together, this has led to higher returns both from net interest (the difference on interest charged to borrowers and paid to savers) and interest paid to banks on reserves they hold at the Bank of England.
As a result, bank profits are now much higher than they were in the period before the financial crisis. But after the pandemic, the Conservatives slashed taxes on banks.
TUC analysis reveals an increase in the bank surcharge could raise between £23bn-55bn over the next four years:
- A 16% surcharge, which is doubling what it originally was before the Conservatives cut it, would deliver £23bn.
- A 35% surcharge, which would be the same level as the windfall tax the Conservatives imposed on energy companies, would deliver £55bn.
- Even just reversing the Tory cuts and setting it at 8% – which the TUC says is the “bare minimum” – would raise £9bn over the next four years.
The union body also warns that if interest rates remain higher for longer, banks will make even more money.
Public support
Recent TUC polling shows significant support for a windfall tax on banks, with two in three (66%) backing this approach. This rises to 83% among Conservative to Labour switchers in the 2024 general election and 73% among Labour voters from the 2024 election now leaning to Reform.
The TUC is also calling for the government to reinstate the cap on banker bonuses to curb excessive pay for senior City executives while the rest of the country struggles with a continued cost of living crisis.
The EU still has a bonus cap, which seeks to reduce excessive risk taking (of the sort that led to the last financial crisis) and align pay with long-term stability not short-term gains.
TUC General Secretary Paul Nowak said:
Donald Trump’s illegal war abroad risks unleashing economic chaos at home.
It’s absolutely right that the government does everything it can to protect British households and firms from Trumpflation.
The longer this war goes on, the more likely the government will need to step in with increased support.
That’s why it’s now more vital than ever that banks pay their fair share in tax. Getting banks to contribute more is just common sense.
After the Tories slashed the bank surcharge, high interest rates created a profits bonanza for banks. And if rates remain higher for longer, banks are set to cash in even more.
Instead of lining their own pockets with eyewatering bonuses, it’s only right that banks’ bumper profits are taxed fairly to invest in our hospitals, schools and local councils.
Featured image via the Canary
Politics
Iran threatens to destroy US-linked Gulf oil facilities
The Iranian government has said it will destroy all oil facilities around the Gulf region rather than let the Trump-Netanyahu axis get its hands on, or destroy, its Kharg Island oil terminal. The warning came after the US launched an attack of about fifteen bombs on military facilities on Iran’s island. Trump, typically, called the attack:
one of the most powerful bombing raids in the History of the Middle East, [which] totally obliterated every MILITARY target in Iran’s crown jewel, Kharg Island.
The tiny island in the Persian gulf holds an oil terminal handling around 90% of Iran’s oil exports, as well as military defences. Trump has also threatened the oil terminal, and has been obsessed since at least 1988 with taking it for US profits. Iran, however, said it would destroy the whole region’s oil-handling capabilities rather than let his tiny hands touch it.
The IRGC-linked Fars News Agency said on Saturday 14 March 2026 that more the US caused more than 15 explosions targeting Iran’s air defences, airport and naval base. It said that if Trump attacks Kharg or any of Iran’s energy infrastructure:
…all oil and gas infrastructure in the region in which the U.S. and its allies have interests will be set on fire and destroyed.
Given Iran’s success in bombing US bases in the region and Israeli occupied Palestinian cities, few would doubt that Iran is capable of carrying out its threat. This would trigger a global oil crisis as well as almost certainly collapsing the ‘petrodollar’, the main thing propping up the US currency with over 1 Trillion demand on USD annually from the region.
Is Trump stupid enough to gamble that Iran is bluffing? Absolutely. Whether he actually will remains to be seen.
Featured image via Raksha Anirveda
Politics
Israel’s targeting of Palestinian Muslims during Ramadan 2026
The International Centre of Justice for Palestinians has released a seventeen-page report on Israel’s targeting of Palestinian Muslims. The report, released on the final Friday of Ramadan, documents the rising attacks on Muslims in Palestine.
In recent years, Ramadan has been associated with increased attacks on Palestinians by Israeli police and settlers alike, often working in close collaboration with one another. This report covers longstanding trends of these annual increases in attacks.
It also addresses new administrative measures introduced this year, to curtail Muslims’ ability to observe traditional religious practices associated with Ramadan. This includes bans on traditional roles, as well as bans on decorations and restriction of access to holy sites.
As well as these increased measures during Ramadan, the report also covers Israel’s systematic attack on mosques in Gaza, since the beginning of the genocide in October 2023. In total, Israeli forces have destroyed or heavily damaged about 1,160 out of Gaza’s 1,244 mosques, amounting to 93.2% of total mosques.
Religious apartheid against Muslims
The report comprehensively outlines Israel’s violations with international law. And it also highlights new legislative efforts within Israel to further entrench religious apartheid against Muslims. These include the 2023 Amendment to Counter Terrorism Law and the ongoing ‘Call to Prayer Bill’, both of which infringe upon Muslims’ rights to practise their religion freely.
Finally, the report provides a list of recommendations to both Israel and third state parties. The report calls on third party states such as the UK to explore and enact measures to:
- Ensure the accountability of perpetrators of international crimes, grave human rights violations and abuses by Israel and illegal settlers in the occupied Palestinian territories.
- Comply with all international legal obligations, namely pertaining to the International Court of Justice Advisory Opinion of July 2024 and the Geneva Convention.
- Cease aiding or assisting in the commission of violations.
International Centre of Justice for Palestinians senior legal officer Dania Abul Haj said:
Since the beginning of the war on Iran, Israeli authorities have now ordered the total closure of Al Aqsa mosque, banning worshippers from prayer there and citing ‘safety measures’ which is ironic considering that everything else in the city remains open, including restaurants, cafes, shops, institutions.
It is also ironic considering the decades-long military oppression against Palestinians and the contradiction between statements and practice at times.
Israel is trying to impose a new reality in which they have full control over Al Aqsa Mosque and Haram Al Sharif. However, it is important to remind Israel, that as an occupying power, it has no sovereignty over religious sites in Jerusalem, and this is in contravention with its international obligations.
Featured image via the Canary
Politics
Jenin Creative Cultural Centre – Canary
Although they have taken part in film and theatre festivals in various European countries, Yousef Shalabi and his team at Jenin Creative Cultural Centre have not visited the UK since 2006. Many changes have taken place since then.
Jenin Creative Cultural Centre — ‘Despite the pain we can celebrate our music’
He tells the Canary:
There’s now a new generation, a new era of suffering and madness in the Middle East. There are lots of changes, but unfortunately they do not give us a better life. Democracy, human rights, the international community and freedom have failed us many times over the years. All the world saw what happened in Gaza, and the unlimited destruction. And this has destroyed the dreams of the Palestinian people of having their independent state. We saw that Europe and the US want to stop the war in Ukraine, but when it comes to Palestinian rights, no one cares. International institutions are also facing collapse, and there is not even support for UNRWA, the last institution supporting the Palestinian refugees. So really, so much has happened.
The musicians from the centre are hoping to return to the UK later this year. Their goal is to show people that despite all the daily hardships Palestinians face, they are carrying a message of hope.
Shalabi says:
We want to live in peace, with dignity, as all other nations do, and to build a future for our kids. Despite the pain, we can celebrate our music and let others enjoy it too. We also want to create awareness among the British people, and let them know we salute them for their solidarity, and their big demonstrations in support of Palestine. Hopefully this tour will happen and will be as successful as the one in 2006.
Psychological trauma and economic hardship part of daily Palestinian life
Jenin Creative Cultural Centre was established in 2005, as a response to the Jenin Refugee Camp massacre of 2002, by the Israeli occupation. Destruction was widespread in the camp, and many residents were displaced. According to Shalabi, there was a growing need at the time for psychological support, especially for the women and children.
Now, more than 20 years later, the needs of the community are greater than ever. The Israeli occupation recently forcibly displaced all 17,000 residents from Jenin Refugee Camp, as part of its campaign to ethnically cleanse the occupied territory of Palestinians. Currently, the West Bank has also been plunged into its deepest economic crisis on record. So the work of the Jenin Creative Cultural Centre has become essential.
But tightened movement restrictions since October 2023, as well as safety concerns due to increased violence by the Israeli occupation forces (IOF), have made it much more difficult for Palestinians to make their way to the centre. So the staff — who are all volunteers — go to the community instead. Shalabi says several of the musicians have faced severe problems, while growing restrictions have also prevented them from getting together to play music.
One musician lost his brother, who was killed by a drone in front of his house in the Jenin camp. Another two became displaced with their families. One of them was Alaa. He toured with the Jenin Creative Cultural Centre 20 years ago, but has now lost everything. It’s so important to have such musicians to play our music, despite the horrible conditions. They used to play to groups of 60 children at the centre, but we now go mainly to the Arab American University.
Art is a tool which can be used to heal Jenin
There are around 600 families currently staying at the university, who were displaced from Jenin Refugee Camp more than 14 months ago. They still know nothing about what has happened to their homes. Many children are among them, so Jenin Creative Cultural Centre also does activities for them, such as facepainting, while running workshops for the women.
While those forcibly displaced from Jenin Refugee Camp are particularly affected by depression and trauma, Shalabi says the daily lives of others in Jenin are no less traumatic, with many having lost family members, and friends. Allowing people to talk about the hardships they have endured is sometimes enough to help them leave behind the traumatic situations they have faced. But sometimes they may need something more.
We see art as a tool, for healing. It creates an atmosphere of peace and relaxation. We wanted to create a safer place, where children can practice hobbies. Our projects, such as our pottery workshop, also help women develop new skills, to enable them to get a livelihood and some income.
An important part of Jenin Creative Cultural Centre’s work is also to build bridges with the international community, and create awareness of the ongoing situation caused by ‘Israel’. Shalabi says they want to invite their friends from around the world to not only volunteer and bring their various skills to the local Palestinian community, but to also live with the Palestinian people, and experience life under occupation.
He adds:
There are also lots of interesting historical sites in the Jenin area, and you can enjoy the Palestinian food. This is an invitation for anyone who is interested to come and see, and live with us, and show the Palestinians your solidarity.
Help Jenin Creative Cultural Centre’s musicians play traditional Palestinian music to a UK audience
Jenin Creative Cultural Centre needs to raise £10,000 for their three week trip to the UK. There are plans for musical evenings to take place in universities, cinemas and centres in both England and Scotland.
The plan is for six volunteers from the centre to take part in the tour, including five musicians. These include a singer, a keyboard player, a traditional Palestinian flute player, and a musician who plays the Oud — one of the oldest string instruments, originating in the Middle East.
Shalabi says:
You will miss a lot if you don’t come. We are sure you will enjoy our performance of Palestinian traditional music, and you will dance. Music is a way to unify people for peace and entertainment, and hopefully we will meet you all with the spirit of happiness.

Please send donations to this link
Featured image via author
Politics
Adventures in the dark heart of Lib Dem-land
‘Compare us with every other party in the House of Commons today and we’re easily the most united, with the biggest smile on our face’, Ed Davey informed the Financial Times in January. Well, Ed Davey has always been more of a clown than a contender, even if he is favoured by the provincial middle-class demographic that dominates the party’s membership. Restore UK MP Rupert Lowe spoke for those of us outside this bubble when posting his opinion of Davey on X: ‘You are a low-IQ gnome whose talents would be better suited to fishing bits of bird shit out a garden pond.’
This jibe was a response to one of Davey’s many attacks on Elon Musk – ‘He must be held to account for what he is: a purveyor of child pornography’, said Davey in January. But it could have been a response to any one of the Lib Dem leader’s desperate grabs for attention. Just this week, he was calling for the cancellation of King Charles’s trip stateside in July, to mark the 250th anniversary of the United States Declaration of Independence. He claimed the king’s presence would be a ‘diplomatic coup for President Trump… someone who repeatedly insults and damages our country’.
Like Musk, Vladimir Putin and Benjamin Netanyahu, Trump has become a regular target of Davey’s posturing and tweeting, all of which is as embarrassing as the stunts he embarks on to highlight local concerns. He slid down a waterslide to promote children’s mental-health services. He drummed on an exercise ball to highlight social care. He bungee jumped to encourage voters to support his party at the 2024 General Election, and rode a roller coaster at Thorpe Park to launch its manifesto. Throughout this, Ed Davey wears what Quentin Crisp, when describing the face he settled on to face the world, called a look of ‘fatuous affability’. You could state the number of victims of largely Pakistani grooming gangs, or reveal that ABBA had reformed, and Davey’s expression would remain the same.
Actually, the second of these is the safe topic more likely to begin a discussion among the party faithful. If the Lib Dem leader dared to draw attention to the systematic rape of white working-class girls, it would doubtless be via a flume ride at Center Parcs. That’s not to imply that he is not a moral man. Davey sees himself as a saviour with a mission, fully aware of his priorities. In 2025, he said he had a ‘moral duty’ to ensure that Nigel Farage does not become British prime minister.
The largest concentration of support for the Liberal Democrats is in the West Country, where a battle royal with Reform UK is expected to commence at the next General Election. I have some skin in the game, as someone who moved from my native London to this territory a decade ago. I found decent, generous people, who fed and watered me during cocktail hour, among Lib Dem supporters. Politics was avoided like bad etiquette, until Brexit, Donald Trump, the pink ladies’ protests, and marches against grooming gangs and mass immigration arose amid the chit-chat and clinking glass. Then things got ugly. When it came to politics, these people were not the people I thought they were, but they were the people I feared they might be. As they are quick to condemn and caricature those without the luxury beliefs permitted within the echo chamber in which they exist, permeated by those of a similar class, status and pedigree (I’m the exception to the rule), I feel no hesitation in sharing my field notes on those loyal to Lib Dem land.
The provincialism of the middle-class Lib Dem loyalist is not attributable to place, but outlook. These are people convinced they are multicultural and cosmopolitan, while limiting themselves to a parochial social circle. They are conventional people who labour under the delusion they are rebellious. They embrace their status while simultaneously denying it, so as to appear empathetic, sometimes casting themselves as the privileged poor. They support the Lib Dems because the Tories are too crass, Reform is too common and Labour is too costly.
I’ve witnessed an elderly Lib Dem devotee, who lives in a house large enough to warrant a tour guide, declare that he and his wife would not be able to eat if they didn’t sell up within two years. He also owned rental homes and bought his children homes to rent to others, with inherited family money. A lady who lunches, who admitted to a crush on former party leader Nick Clegg, revealed tearfully: ‘I felt physical pain when the Brexit result came through, because my children wouldn’t be able to travel through Europe as I had.’ Her children were at the local private school, even though she disapproved of private education. ‘They would not have survived at state school.’ After attending university, and enjoying a stint in London, their children return to this territory as adults, to become parents, to become the next generation of Liberal Democrat supporters.
In recent months, the party unity that brought a smile to the Lib Dem leader’s face has begun to fragment. There are rumours of dissent in the ranks due to Davey’s failure to capitalise on the anger the electorate harbours for the Labour government. This ‘frustration’ was confirmed when Politics UK quoted one disenchanted MP: ‘Reform [is] assuming a place in the national debate, and so are the Greens. We are content to not do this. And it isn’t good enough.’ Anticipating that this unrest could fester, Davey took himself away from Thorpe Park and Alton Towers to present himself as a political player on the world stage. Yet the statements he issues to give himself gravitas, consisting in the main of anti-Trump posturing, are as empty as the stunts and pratfalls at theme parks – and, ultimately, have as little impact.
Last year, Davey announced he would be boycotting a state banquet for President Trump, as a stand against his response to the crisis in Gaza. Tapping into the student slogans then (and still) doing the rounds, Davey declared that Israel’s prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, and his government were responsible for ‘genocide’. Playing to the same raggedy crowd, he demanded the recognition of a Palestinian state.
Presently, Elon Musk is as much of a folk devil as Trump for the likes of Davey. He accused the X owner of meddling in democracy and inciting far-right violence during the Unite the Kingdom march – an event that angered Davey and his tribe as much as the Brexit vote. Playing David to Musk’s Goliath, he suggests ‘Tesla tariffs’ to hit him where it hurts, and prosecuting him under the Online Safety Act for allowing material that shows child abuse and self-harm on X. This from the leader who advised his party to abstain in a parliamentary vote on a national inquiry into the rape gangs and the efforts to cover up their crimes.

As part of the 2024 General Election campaign, Ed Davey rides a rollercoaster at Thorpe Park, 10 June 2024.
When it comes to issues such as Brexit, Davey’s reaction is extreme. He proposes building bridges with the EU that would eliminate the result. Yet his party claims to be the ‘moderate’ voice absent in British politics. Supposedly, the Lib Dems are the ‘progressive’ response to the ‘populism’ of Nigel Farage and Reform UK, which he believes adheres to Trumpian politics and an American-style ‘right wing’ fervour, compared with the ‘British values’ and ‘patriotism’ the Lib Dems represent. This is clearly a recent development, given his party previously talked of ‘patriotism’ much as Labour MPs and student activists did – that is, as synonymous with ‘racist’ and ‘fascist’. The pratfalls of Davey pale into insignificance when compared with former leader Tim Farron draping himself in the Union Jack at the party’s autumn 2025 conference in Bournemouth – an event as white as Glastonbury, so white in fact it might alarm Jon Snow. The Lib Dem supporters and MPs indulging in this tragic spectacle, like those at the Labour Party conference attempting something similar with the various flags of the United Kingdom, had everyone else cringing at the comic desperation of it.
Davey and the current crop of Lib Dem MPs are neither genuinely progressive people nor serious politicians, but they emerged from parties that included figures that were. The high watermark of the Liberal Party in the 20th century was the years in government, 1906 to 1915, during which the ‘New Liberalism’ introduced the welfare reforms that successive Labour governments built on. The Liberals’ fortunes changed with their merger with the Social Democratic Party in 1988, the party founded seven years prior by the Gang of Four. These were the veteran Labour MPs who left the party as it began to prioritise the left-wing fringe issues that would eventually define its ideology – a process that would ultimately alienate working-class supporters and transform it into the party of the middle class that it is today.
During the period the Lib Dems found themselves in government, between 2010 and 2015, in an unholy alliance with the Conservatives, they were criticised by their own side at the time for reneging on abolishing student tuition fees. In the years since, it’s the negligence of Ed Davey as minister for postal affairs during the Post Office and Horizon IT scandal that has drawn criticism from elsewhere. When the ITV drama Mr Bates vs The Post Office returned the story to the headlines in January 2024, Telegraph columnist Allison Pearson posted on X:
‘Ed Davey was paid £833 an hour – over £220,000 in total – to advise lawyers who were acting for the Post Office. (Taking taxpayers’ money to persecute petrified, innocent people.) As postal-affairs minister, Davey refused to believe Alan Bates about Post Office bullying. But happy to jump into the trough after.’
Davey’s knack for jumping on a bandwagon just as it’s leaving town has become evident since he took the helm of the party. He replaced Jo Swinson, the first female leader of the Liberal Democrats, who defeated him in the previous leadership challenge. Swinson put a smile on all our faces when her image appeared on the promotional leaflets during the 2019 campaign, arriving through the letterbox among the pizza flyers, with the declaration that we were looking at ‘Britain’s next prime minister’.
The brash declarations Davey now peddles are as performative as the indignation his fellow MPs express when rising to their feet in the House of Commons. This is notable among the party’s female MPs. Last October, deputy leader Daisy Cooper aired her indignation, and shared her limited insight, on a subject outside the echo chamber in which Liberal Democrat MPs exist: Tommy Robinson. She demanded the current prime minister direct the security services to evaluate the threat that Elon Musk ‘poses to our democracy’ for giving Robinson legal support (he had just been charged under the Terrorism Act in 2024 for refusing to give police his phone password, and was subsequently acquitted). In April 2025, the diminutive West Country Lib Dem MP, Tessa Munt, made similar demands, shrinking behind huge dark glasses – she’s sensitive to the harsh lights in the chamber – that would have dwarfed Anna Wintour.
Munt lives in Wedmore and represents Wells. In the country at weekends, at a Saturday surgery, or at hedgehog farms that feature on Facebook posts, she sports an archaic Sloane Ranger look of cashmere crew neck, a polo shirt with the collar raised, jeans, Chelsea boots and pearls. Munt, rightfully and nobly, supports local farmers and addresses their current grievances, but doesn’t extend this to the victims of grooming gangs. This was evident in her contribution to a cross-party Commons debate, in response to a contribution from Conservative MP Katie Lam.
Opening a moving, heartfelt speech, Lam addressed the need for an inquiry into the rape gangs, highlighting the racial and religious aspects that contributed to these crimes. She said: ‘One of the victims from Dewsbury was told by her rapist: “We’re here to fuck all the white girls and fuck the government.”’ Lam spoke graphically about the violence the victims had suffered, informing the few figures present in the commons, the language was necessary because ‘We must not look away or sanitise this evil’.
She quoted the sentencing remarks of judge Peter Rook, who gave Mohammed Karrar of Oxford life in prison:
‘You prepared her [his victim, a 13-year-old girl] for gang anal rape by using a pump to expand her anal passage. You subjected her to gang rape by five or six men. At one point she had four men inside her. A red ball was placed in her mouth to keep her quiet… When she was 12, after raping her, she threatened you with your lock knife. Your reaction was to pick up a baseball bat with a silver metal handle, strike her on the head with it, and then insert the baseball bat inside her vagina.’
Lam concluded:
‘This is not about me, the minister, the home secretary or any honourable members in the chamber; it is about the little girls, up and down our country, whose brutal and repeated rapes were permitted and hidden by those in the British state whose jobs were to protect them.’
Responding to Lam, Munt made the issue about herself, and sanitised this evil in the process. ‘My blood is boiling as I listen to the stuff coming from Conservative members’, she said, playing to the gallery. ‘If they had read the independent inquiry into child sexual abuse, they would recognise that there are hundreds of thousands of people alive today – people just like me, white girls – who suffered at the hands of white men who have got clean away with it, because nothing was done for so long.’ As Madeline Grant wrote in her Telegraph column at the time: ‘Belittling the unspeakable abuse of thousands of girls as “stuff” is bad enough; even worse to do so from the comfort of places where the realities of “community tension” are scarcely felt.’
In essence, here is the sinister undertow that lies beneath the ‘moderate’ veneer of the Liberal Democrats. The contempt they harbour for those outside their bubble, with a different experience and a different outlook, who now support Reform, is no different to that expressed by hysterical protesters with blue hair and placards, putting their weight behind Your Party or the Greens. The difference being the provincial middle-class Lib Dem devotees come with hand-knitted scarves, Hunter wellies, Barbour jackets, Amnesty tote bags, and pearls. They carry their Fitzcarraldo Editions to coffee shops for effect, but read Cormoran Strike novels in book groups. They would rather defend the BBC than defund it. They listen to The Last Dinner Party.
The UK political party these people loyally support is not currently a real threat, but it could become one. And Ed Davey could still be leading the Liberal Democrats and in the running, garnering support from disgruntled Labour moderates and Tory wets. At which point the smile on that fatuous face will widen. To the rest of us, Davey will still be the joke he’s always been. But the joke won’t be funny anymore.
Politics
What Virgins Over 30 Bring Up Most In Sex Therapy
Expert comment provided by licensed sexologist, relationship therapist, and author at Passionerad, Sofie Roos.
Previously, we heard from sexologist and relationship therapist Sofie Roos about what straight men and straight women bring up the most in sex therapy.
And this week, she spoke to us about the topics virgins over 30 discuss most with her.
1) Performance anxiety and not knowing “what to do”
“Many people over 30 who’re still virgins… [talk to me] about performance anxiety… they often worry about not knowing what to do during sex, that they will mess up, or that it will get awkward,” Roos said.
Other common fears include being judged by your partner and not having the supposed “right” physical responses to sex and foreplay.
This stress, the sexologist said, can sometimes create a vicious cycle. “These kinds of worries easily lead to the physical reactions they’re afraid of, such as erection problems, difficulties with getting wet, or having a hard time relaxing.”
2) Feelings of shame and feeling “behind”
Because society often has “norms for when we should have sex the first time,” Roos said, some virgins aged 30 and over feel they’re behind or “as if something is wrong with you, even though it most often isn’t”.
It can make communication with partners and even dating feel more difficult, she added.
3) Worries about their desirability and low sexual self-esteem
Some in this group “develop doubts about their ability to attract, or their desirability as a romantic partner,” the therapist told us.
“Even though there’s absolutely nothing wrong with you,” she said, those who haven’t lost their virginity at 30 or older can “see themselves as less appealing and capable in intimate situations than what they actually are”.
And it’s not uncommon for people to “grow an insecurity around flirting, intimacy and emotional closeness, making many of the natural elements in finding a partner feel too overwhelming,” she added.
4) Fear of pain
Pain during penetration is a relatively common concern for straight women, Roos told us last week. And for virgins aged 30 and over, she told us many are afraid of “pain during sex, which just increases the risk for unpleasant intimacy, especially in women.
“For people with vulvas, being afraid of pain during penetration can lead to difficulties with relaxing and getting wet, making the sex unpleasant,” she added.
And for men, “worrying can cause temporary erection problems, which also tend to put people in a very negative loop where having sex becomes something that feels more and more difficult each time you try”.
So… any advice?
Roos had some words of wisdom for people in this group, starting with destigmatising being a virgin after 30.
“There’s no deadline for when you should have sex for the first time – it’s all about what feels right for you! It’s normal to have your sex debut early, and it’s normal to have it late, and at what age you first get intimate says extremely little about how the rest of your sex life will be,” she said.
She also said that sometimes, those who feel they’re “late” to having sex can put a premium on experience, even at the cost of pleasure. But she thinks it’s healthier to stay present, start as slow as you like, and communicate.
“Start with kisses and just being close, and then take it from there at the tempo you enjoy, and focus on how it feels and on the moment instead of on what you’re doing, something that builds safety and makes it feel way better”.
Roos also says many virgins over 30 are “scared about telling the person they’re seeing that they never have had sex before, but in my experience, a date often responds with way more understanding and empathy than we expect.”
Explaining where you’re at sexually can make further communication easier.
You should also learn “what feels good, both physically, emotionally and mentally” – that “makes sexual encounters feel more welcoming, safe and less mystical, which is key for taking that step”.
Lastly, the sexologist said, don’t be afraid of seeking expert help, or even talking to a friend, if you need. That’s “extremely valuable if the fear, shame and anxiety are strong and difficult to deal with on your own”.
Politics
Review: I Tried Fwee’s Lip And Cheek Tint
We hope you love the products we recommend! All of them were independently selected by our editors. Just so you know, HuffPost UK may collect a share of sales or other compensation from the links on this page if you decide to shop from them. Oh, and FYI – prices are accurate and items in stock as of time of publication.
When I was in secondary school, matte lips were everything.
Whether you were part of the crowd who put foundation on their lips and called it a day or not; everyone could agree that a great, statement matte lip was a very powerful thing.
But, as with so many things that are hugely popular when you’re a teen, it’s easy to develop a knee-jerk aversion to it when you’re an adult.
This is what happened to me, dear reader. Around the time I got to university, I turned my back on bold matte lipsticks in favour of, well, virtually everything else, and haven’t looked back since.
Well… That is, until now.
On a whim, I decided to try the Lip & Cheek Blurry Pudding Pot by South Korean brand Fwee, in shade Boss (one of the darkest colours available, naturally).
I was tempted by the fact it’s a lip and cheek duo. Even though I rarely go bold with my blush, I get way too much satisfaction from a perfectly matching cheek-and-lip combo.
Widespread love of K-Beauty isn’t new – and I’m certainly not immune to the hype. In fact, according to the Boots Beauty & Wellness Trends Report for 2026, one K-Beauty product sells every 11 seconds at Boots.
But when it comes to this little pot, the hype is very much warranted.
In fact, I’d go so far as saying that it’s got me feeling a way about matte lips that I haven’t felt since Kylie Jenner had blue hair.
Sure, I dabbled with Glossier’s Generation G just like every other millennial makeup wearer in the world, but that was semi-sheer and a lot more subtle. This is a very different level of pigment.
The first time I popped this pudding on my lips and cheeks, I put it to the test over dinner.
I didn’t top it up once over the course of the meal, and was pleasantly surprised to find that it hadn’t budged an inch while I’d been eating and drinking.
While you want to make sure your lips are in a moisturised, non-flaky state when you put it on (it clings to the cracks as you might expect), I’ve found that this lippy is also super comfortable to wear and non-drying, which is a very far cry from lots of the other matte lip products out there.
Heaven help you if you put it on and change your mind, though! Even when I tried to take it off, a lighter shade of berry lingered.
It’s super easy to apply to the lips – I just used my fingers and blurred out the edges a little for a softer look.
The main drawback is that it’s harder to get the cheeks just right with a colour this big and bold.
I’ve been using a brush to make blending easier, but the balance between too much and too little is a very fine one. For me, striking that balance is still a work in progress.
All in all, however, at £16, the Fwee Lip & Cheek Blurry Pudding Pot is an utter bargain. I’ll be popping at least five more shades on my wishlist.
Politics
Politics Home Article | Lib Dems Fear Frustrated MPs Could Defect To The Greens

4 min read
There is concern within the Liberal Democrats that some of their MPs could defect to the Greens amid restlessness over the direction of the party.
A senior Liberal Democrat MP told PoliticsHome that at least two Lib Dem MPs — both representing traditionally Conservative constituencies in southern England captured during the party’s 2024 surge — could be tempted to switch to Zack Polanski’s party.
Ed Davey led the Lib Dems to a record 72 seats at the last general election, which made them the third biggest party in the House of Commons. Their gains came largely at the expense of Tories in so-called ‘blue wall’ parts of the country.
Since then, however, there has been growing disquiet within the parliamentary party, with Lib Dem MPs privately questioning the strategic direction and complaining that they have failed to capitalise on the success of 2024.
This restlessness has been fuelled by Polanski’s Greens overtaking the Lib Dems in recent polls. Polanski, previously a Lib Dem, has been credited with sharpening the Greens’ message and expanding their appeal beyond traditional environmental voters.
YouGov this week put the Liberal Democrats in fifth place nationally on 14 per cent, trailing behind Reform, the Conservatives, the Greens and Labour.
“Ed is the most successful leader the party has ever had. He’s won more MPs than ever before, and has a story that genuinely connects with the public. But he’s lost all momentum,” one Lib Dem MP told PoliticsHome.
The same MP added: “There’s a huge opportunity in the centre for the Lib Dems. Ed’s team needs to stop holding back now and really go for it. Otherwise, we’ll just disappear.”
“Everyone’s frustrated,” added a different Lib Dem MP.
Davey has made opposition to Donald Trump a key part of his political agenda, regularly calling on the Labour government to be firmer with the US President.
Internal plans obtained by The Spectator reveal a belief among Lib Dem strategists that their strong opposition to US strikes on Iran will pay dividends at the 7 May local elections.
One memo leaked to the publication reads: “For the first time since the Iraq war… we have a chance to turn a distinctive and principled Liberal Democrat position on foreign affairs into significant election gains.”
However, critical Lib Dems MPs say that, beyond their position on the Trump administration, a lack of a clear policy platform is leaving them with little to talk about.
A Green Party Source told PoliticsHome: “Zack has made it clear that his door is open to anyone who shares the Green Party’s values – but right now he is focused on electing a wave of green councillors, mayors and Sennedd members in May.”
As the party gets together for its spring conference in York this weekend, MPs are starting to wonder whether Davey, who has been Lib Dem leader since 2020, is the right person to lead the party into the next general election.
However, as things stand, there is no sense that his position is under serious threat, nor that there is an obvious successor.
The party’s deputy leader, Daisy Cooper, former leadership contender, Layla Moran, and party president, Josh Babarinde, elected in 2024, are names mentioned by MPs as potential future leaders.
In a recent interview with The House magazine, the Liberal Democrat MP Roz Savage hinted at her own frustrations when asked whether Davey remained the best person to lead the party.
“I can’t say anything about that on the record,” she replied.
One of her colleagues told PoliticsHome: “It’s what everyone’s thinking, she’s just the first to say something publicly.”
Lisa Smart, the Lib Dem MP for Hazel Grove, who is helping devise party strategy, urged colleagues to get behind their leader.
“Ed is the most popular party leader in the country and the strongest voice in Parliament when it comes to standing up to Donald Trump or building closer ties with Europe,” she told PoliticsHome.
“Of course, we have a big bit of work to do coming up with bold new policies as we get closer to the next election, and I’m really proud of all my Liberal Democrat colleagues working hard to do that.”
She added: We are focused on winning, because that’s how we stop Reform, elect more Liberal Democrat MPs and change the country. We have a huge opportunity to win more seats, but also a duty to stop Nigel Farage getting anywhere near Number 10.”
One of the strategic questions facing the Lib Dems is what political direction to pursue as part of their bid to build on their success at the 2024 general election.
There are some MPs, like Savage, who describe themselves as being on the left of the party.
However, there are those who believe the party should continue prioritising former Conservative voters through more centre-right positions on issues like fiscal responsibility.
“We need to be making the case to Conservative voters that we can be trusted on the economy or they won’t vote for us,” said one Lib Dem MP.
-
Tech3 days agoA 1,300-Pound NASA Spacecraft To Re-Enter Earth’s Atmosphere
-
News Videos5 days ago10th Algebra | Financial Planning | Question Bank Solution | Board Exam 2026
-
Business4 days agoExxonMobil seeks to move corporate registration from New Jersey to Texas
-
Crypto World10 hours agoHYPE Token Enters Net Deflation as HyperCore Buybacks Outpace Staking Rewards
-
Crypto World5 days agoParadigm, a16z, Winklevoss Capital, Balaji Srinivasan among investors in ZODL
-
Fashion21 hours agoWeekend Open Thread: Addict Lip Glow
-
Tech4 days agoChatGPT will now generate interactive visuals to help you with math and science concepts
-
Sports7 days agoThree share 2-shot lead entering final round in Hong Kong
-
Sports6 days agoBraveheart Lakshya downs Lai in epic battle to enter All England Open final | Other Sports News
-
NewsBeat3 days agoResidents reaction as Shildon murder probe enters second day
-
Business6 days agoSearch for Nancy Guthrie Enters 37th Day as FBI Probes Wi-Fi Jammer Theory
-
Business3 days agoSearch Enters Sixth Week With New Leads in Tucson Abduction Case
-
NewsBeat5 days agoPagazzi Lighting enters administration as 70 jobs lost and 11 stores close across Scotland
-
Tech5 days agoDespite challenges, Ireland sixth in EU for board gender diversity
-
Business5 days agoSearch Enters 39th Day with FBI Tip Line Developments and No Major Breakthroughs
-
NewsBeat3 days agoI Entered The Manosphere. Nothing Could Prepare Me For What I Found.
-
Business1 hour agoUS Airports Launch Donation Drives for Unpaid TSA Workers as Partial Government Shutdown Enters Fifth Week
-
Sports5 days agoSkateboarding World Championships: Britain’s Sky Brown wins park gold
-
Crypto World4 days agoWill Chainlink price reclaim $10 amid volatility squeeze?
-
Business2 hours agoCountry star Brantley Gilbert enters growing non-alcoholic beer market



