Connect with us
DAPA Banner

Politics

Politics Home | Arthritis UK to shine a light in Parliament on young people living with arthritis

Published

on

Arthritis UK to shine a light in Parliament on young people living with arthritis
Arthritis UK to shine a light in Parliament on young people living with arthritis

In the UK, there are about 10,000 children and young people living with a form of arthritis

In every constituency, there will be young people having to navigate the difficulties of growing up with this chronic illness. This is why Arthritis UK is bringing a young people’s art exhibition to Parliament next week to shine a light on their experiences so that they receive the recognition and care they deserve. 

Advertisement

Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA) is a form of inflammatory arthritis diagnosed in people under the age of 16. Receiving a diagnosis at such a young age can be an overwhelming experience, and this disease impacts all stages of what can be considered a balanced and fair upbringing. 

For young people, having arthritis translates into missing school or playtime for medical appointments, having to learn complex medical terminology alongside completing homework, balancing fatigue with maintaining a healthy social life, and isolation proven to impact relationships and family planning.

Arthritis UK believes that the needs of young people living with arthritis have been neglected, leading to poor diagnosis and poor outcomes from a lack of support, and stigma. This World Young Rheumatic Disease Day (WORD Day) (18th March), the charity is calling on MPs to challenge the common misconception that arthritis is ‘just an old person’s disease’.

Advertisement

Prime Minister Keir Starmer has a personal connection to the cause, often speaking about his own mother’s diagnosis of Still’s disease, which is a form of JIA. 

In the run-up to the WORD Day, Arthritis UK is proud to welcome just a fraction of the children and young people across the UK living with JIA into Parliament to celebrate the opening of an art exhibition, ‘Inside Arthritis’. The exhibition will be displayed in the Upper Waiting Hall (9th to 12th March), and parliamentarians will have the chance to hear first-hand the very real challenges and needs of these young ambassadors. 

The artwork displayed in the exhibition has been sourced from Arthritis UK’s ‘Joint Creativity’ art programme. ‘Joint Creativity’ educates young people about the science behind their condition through fun and accessible mediums. These interactive sessions are an opportunity to connect with a community that understands the difficulties of growing up with a chronic illness, which can often be an isolating experience.

Arthritis can equally impact mental health as much as physical health, with a recent report from Arthritis UK, Left Waiting, Left Behind, revealing that one in four people living with arthritis experience anxiety most of or all the time.

Advertisement

Therefore, having a creative outlet can make understanding these processes less intimidating and encourage young people to feel in control of their condition.  

This is true for Penny, 14, from Kent, who lives with JIA and has been a longstanding art club attendee and said:

“Joint Creativity made me feel less alone because I was meeting other young people with JIA, talking with others who really understand because they are going through the same things.

“There’s still a misconception around JIA because people still think that arthritis is something that only affects older people. I think the fact younger people get it needs to be more well-known because that awareness would bring more understanding.”

Advertisement

Arthritis UK, the UK’s leading arthritis charity, works to ensure that all people living with arthritis and other musculoskeletal conditions are cared for and represented. Whether that be through funding world-leading research, provision of health information to patients and professionals or through services, such as the Young People and Families Service. 

Deborah Alsina MBE, Arthritis UK’s Chief Executive, will be speaking at the opening event and looks forward to hearing the empowering young artists’ stories first hand.

Deborah said: “’Inside Arthritis’ is a great opportunity for parliamentarians to hear first-hand from young people about the stigma and challenges of living with arthritis.  

 

“Like the Prime Minister, many of us know someone living with arthritis, the resilience it requires and the knock-on impact it can have on quality of life and mental health. This is particularly acute for those affected earlier in life; one study has shown nearly 60 per cent of children and young people with Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis had or required mental health support.  

 

“Current polices and services do not adequately reflect the impact on both the individual, family and society. We hope that by hearing from our inspirational young people, parliamentarians will be inspired to help us advocate for greater change and, in doing so, tackle the misconception that arthritis is an older person’s disease.” 

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Politics

Why is Labour so eager to give Muslims special treatment?

Published

on

Why is Labour so eager to give Muslims special treatment?

The UK’s Labour government announced its definition of ‘anti-Muslim hostility’ earlier this month – a long-anticipated move, informed by the advice of an opaque working group, and designed to protect followers of Islam from something vaguely described as ‘hostility’. Alongside the definition, the government also announced plans to appoint a new ‘anti-Muslim hostility tsar’.

Labour’s move is as cynical as it is predictable. It mooted the introduction of a contentious new definition of ‘Islamophobia’ in the run-up to the 2024 General Election. These proposals came in for heavy criticism. The threat they posed to free speech was all too obvious. And so the definition of ‘Islamophobia’ was parked, until it was revived recently under the new guise of ‘anti-Muslim hostility’. That it has arrived now is largely down to Labour’s defeat last month in the Gorton and Denton by-election, where the victorious Green Party hoovered up the traditionally Labour-leaning Muslim vote. Keir Starmer et al have clearly decided that, if their party is to have any future in certain seats, they need to appeal to Muslim voters and fast.

Ministers have tried to reassure the public that the new definition does not grant Muslims ‘preferential treatment’. But who are they kidding? Singling out one religious group for unique protections is a clear sign it’s being treated preferentially compared with other faiths.

Advertisement

One of the government’s most spurious arguments is that the new definition will also protect ‘those who have left Islam’, who might also suffer ‘anti-Muslim hostility’ because they ‘look Muslim’. This is a perplexing claim. Apostates do indeed suffer from hostility – but largely from other, more zealous Muslims, rather than from wider society. In some Islamic societies, they are killed because they have dared to leave the faith. Even in the UK, apostates are persecuted by Islamic hardliners, as shown by the harrowing cases of Nissar Hussain and Hatun Tash.

Both Hussain and Tash are ex-Muslims who have converted to Christianity. Hussain has endured years of persecution, much of it violent, which forced him to flee his native Bradford. Tash was stabbed and was even the target of a foiled murder plot, yet the police repeatedly arrested her at the behest of her tormentors. Perhaps the government would be better focussing its energies on tackling Islamic hardliners’ violent hostility to ex-Muslims.

Advertisement

Enjoying spiked?

Why not make an instant, one-off donation?

We are funded by you. Thank you!

Advertisement




Please wait…

Advertisement
Advertisement

The government’s willingness to give Muslims special protections strikes a particularly raw nerve among other ethnic and religious groups who face persecution in Britain. Earlier this month, approximately 20 Muslims attacked a large Hindu celebration in Harrow, north London. And this was not a one-off event. If the government actually believed what it has been saying about wanting to treat all minority groups equally, Hindus would be well within their rights to lobby for a new definition of ‘anti-Hindu hostility’.

Then there is the threat this new definition poses to freedom of speech. Part of the problem here is the vagueness of the word ‘hostility’. Given there is no legal definition of ‘hostility’, we may well have to use the dictionary meaning, which defines it as ‘ill-will, spite, contempt, prejudice, unfriendliness, antagonism, resentment and dislike’. In other words, ‘hostility’ can be interpreted to mean just about any disagreement with Islam, its practices and even its more extreme expressions.

Advertisement

It’s therefore difficult not to suspect that insulating one faith from criticism could lead to a backdoor blasphemy law. Especially given that the government is encouraging every institution and organisation to adopt this definition. We can be certain that it will it make it difficult to talk about Pakistani-Muslim grooming gangs, female genital mutilation and Islamic extremism. The effect on free speech will be chilling.

Christopher Hitchens’s prophetic words about the calls to ban ‘Islamophobia’ – ‘resist it while you still can’ – apply equally to the idea of ‘anti-Muslim hostility’. If we don’t take a stand now against this threat to free speech, it may soon be too late.

Hardeep Singh is a writer based in London. Follow him on X: @singhtwo2.

Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Trump’s war will turn the cost of living crisis into a global storm

Published

on

The cost of living

The cost of living

Arms dealers, Big Oil, Big Ag, and others stand to profit from the war on Iran—lining their pockets through genocide, ecocide, and plunder.

We’ll be asked to accept inflation as something inevitable, like a natural disaster, instead of recognising it as the deliberate outcome of the genocidal war waged by the Anglo-American-Zionist empire.

We should absolutely not do that.

We have just witnessed centibillionaires—people with more than $100 billion in wealth—increase from none a decade ago to 15 last year, and now to 20 this year. This is an extraordinary accumulation of wealth and increasing inequality.

Advertisement

Transfer of wealth

Economist James Meadway warns that big companies will leverage their market power during this crisis to inflate prices and reap massive profits.

A study on the 2022 oil price surge, after Russia attacked Ukraine, found that US fossil-fuel profits hit $377 billion. of that, 50% went to the wealthiest, while only 1% trickled down to the bottom 50%. Isabella Weber, one of the authors of the study, predicts that:

Advertisement

The same global ownership networks delivered windfalls to UK shareholders.

UK’s End Fuel Poverty Coalition found that North Sea oil and gas giants raked in £127 billion in profits since 2020. They added that three million households funk into fuel poverty. A windfall tax on these profits could generating £5.1 billion a year.

Advertisement

Global South countries will hurt the most

Economist Prabhat Patnaik warns that the global south will bear the brunt of this crisis— from inflation, currency collapse, debt, to austerity. He is of the view that it will be far worse in the global South than in the US or UK.

In a recent interview, he highlighted that the Indian rupee has already hit an all-time low against the dollar.

He explained that when currency depreciates, the price of everything imported rises—not just oil.

Advertisement
View this post on Instagram

A post shared by The Wire (@thewirein)

So, here’s where we are—on one side, there are 20 centibillionaires and billions in profits for oil companies and arms dealers. On the other, genocide in Gaza, destruction in Lebanon, bombs on Iran, and millions in poverty. The system fuels both.

We can either refuse to accept it, or watch it happen again.

Featured image via the Canary/Unspalsh

By The Canary

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Trump-endorsed North Carolina state Senate leader loses by 23 votes

Published

on

Trump-endorsed North Carolina state Senate leader loses by 23 votes

North Carolina Senate leader Republican Phil Berger, who touted President Donald Trump’s endorsement throughout his campaign, conceded defeat Tuesday in his primary election in a race he lost by just 23 votes.

Berger, a powerful figure in state politics, and Rockingham County Sheriff Sam Page were separated by just two votes when unofficial results first came in for the Greensboro-area seat on election night. A machine recount and a separate hand recount of ballots in some counties affirmed the 23-vote loss for the incumbent.

Page is expected to win the Republican-leaning district in November.

“While this was a close race, the voters have spoken, and I congratulate Sheriff Page on his victory,” Berger said in a statement. “Over the past 15 years, Republicans in the General Assembly have fundamentally redefined our state’s outlook and reputation. It has been an honor to play a role in that transformation.”

Advertisement

Page thanked Berger for conceding and bringing an end to a hard-fought campaign.

“I appreciate Senator Berger’s call earlier today and his concession,” he said in a statement. “I’m grateful for his years of service to our state, and I thank him for wishing me the best moving forward.”

The result adds an uncommon blemish to the president’s endorsement scorecard. Candidates he backed have almost universally either won or advanced to runoffs in primaries this cycle, although Trump withheld his endorsement in some heated contests.

Trump endorsed Berger in December, calling him an “America First Patriot” who is “doing an incredible job.” But he also praised Page as “great,” and said both candidates are “outstanding people.”

Advertisement

Berger’s defeat creates a power vacuum in Republican politics in North Carolina. He has led Republicans in the state senate since 2005, including all the nearly 15 years they have spent in the majority since 2011.

Berger has played a key role in crystallizing Republican control, leading a 2024 move to shift authority over elections from the governor to an elections board and to strip the governor and attorney general of key powers shortly before Democratic Gov. Josh Stein and Democratic Attorney General Jeff Jackson entered office.

Last year, Berger helped redraw North Carolina’s congressional maps to give Republicans a better chance of defeating Democratic Rep. Don Davis in the 1st Congressional district.

Page’s primary challenge was ignited in part by pushback to a 2023 gambling expansion proposal touted by Berger that would have paved the way for a new casino in the district. Republicans ultimately abandoned the idea, but Page’s vocal opposition to the proposal gave him the platform for his campaign.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Pentagon wants satellite firms to erase the truth about Iran war

Published

on

Pentagon wants satellite firms to erase the truth about Iran war

The Pentagon is forcing private spy satellite firms to hide the true extent of damage caused in the US-Israeli attack on Iran. The US is ensuring compliance by threatening to cut the funds these firms rely on, leaving the US and global public in the dark.

US reporter Ken Klippenstein said military sources told him:

that the level of secrecy surrounding the specifics of the Iran war is unprecedented, with barely any data being released about the level of bombing, the targets being attacked, or the assessed effects.

Adding:

Now the Trump administration is trying to further control what private companies say in a behind-the-scenes effort [that has] not been previously reported.

The US-Israel attacked Iran first on 28 February without provocation. At the time, Iran was offering unprecedented concessions in negotiations at the time. The Pentagon has since stated there was no imminent threat from Iran. The UN’s atomic watchdog, the IAEA, has also said there is no evidence Iran was developing a nuclear weapon.

Advertisement

Pentagon arm-twisting

Klippenstein wrote that as soon as the war was underway on 28 March:

the military promptly issued guidance to satellite operators of what “language and terms to avoid” when describing damage caused by Iran to American bases in the Middle East, according to a copy of the guidance leaked to me.

For example, the guidance insists firms:

“Avoid language that implies battle damage assessment (BDA) or operational conclusions,” one slide produced by U.S. Space Force says. It goes on to warn against using phrases like “Target destroyed,” “Target eliminated,” and “Structure rendered inoperable.”

And the Pentagon is using its role as a big money contract provider to ensure silence:

Advertisement

While the Pentagon “guidance” to the commercial companies is framed as an advisory, the companies comply because their contracting relationships with the government make them afraid to bite the hand that feeds them.

According to Klippenstein over 100 spy satellite firms rely on military contracts. The industry is worth between $6bn and $77bn a year. And it is not just firms who do classified work who are affected:

even those that work on the collection and dissemination of public or “open source” materials that inform the news media, academia, think tanks, and other groups.

A source told Klippenstein:

While there’s a case to be made that they [the companies] should fight it, almost everyone makes the vast majority of their revenue from government contracts in this industry and after Anthropic, nobody is interested in putting up a fight.

Adding:

I think it’s also another layer of trying to make things [about the war] seem less bad than they are.

The reference to Anthropic relates to an ongoing row between the US military and the tech firm Anthropic:

Advertisement

Anthropic has refused to allow its AI model, Claude, to be used for certain missions involving mass domestic surveillance and autonomous weapons. The Pentagon in response has threatened to invoke the Defense Production Act to force the company’s cooperation.

As the Canary has reported Claude was used in the 3 January US attack on Venezuela.

Trump’s war on the truth

The US has fought to limit public knowledge about the war since it began bombing Iran. And it has reacted belligerently to factual reportage. For example, the White House launched into a bizarre public rant about Drop Site News on 18 March after the outlet reported on US attempts to restart negotiations with Iran.

A spokesperson said:

The radical, left-wing Drop Site News is clearly carrying water for the Iranian terrorist regime – and reports like these based on pure fiction and citing unnamed anonymous sources should be discarded immediately.

Adding:

Advertisement

Iran feeds this fake news media outlet propaganda and they publish it as fact, which is abhorrent, America Last behavior. Operation Epic Fury will continue unabated until President Trump, as Commander-in-Chief, determines that the goals of Operation Epic Fury, including for Iran to no longer pose a military threat, have been fully realized.

Trump’s war against press freedom and open public information rears its head again. As the US war on Iran stalls and Iran itself continues to resist a return to peace talks, we can expect to see more and more efforts to limit access to facts, stymy reporting and cajole the press, public, and private and public institutions into cooperation.

Featured image via the Canary

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

UAE arms supplies to Sudanese militia unaffected by Iran’s strikes

Published

on

UN calls out Rapid Support Forces over "genocidal intent"

The United Arab Emirates (UAE) is re-organising its shipments to the Sudanese Rapid Support Force (RSF) militia. RSF has been waging a genocidal civil war in Sudan since 2023 with the UAE as its main military backer. The Canary reported on 12 March how the Iranian response to the US-Israeli attack had forced UAE to reorganise how it supplied its proxies in Sudan.

Le Monde reported on 23 March that the UAE is using new covert routes to get weapons into the east African state. The French outlet identified:

a network of cargo flights departing the UAE for East and Central Africa, including Ethiopia and the Central African Republic, believed to be part of an arms supply chain to the RSF.

Le Monde reported that two cargo planes linked to the UAE royal family—including an aircraft now owned by a UAE citizen in Africa—has made a series of flights from the Gulf petrostate to Ethiopia. Ethiopia is believed to be home to an RSF supply base.

The paper said one aircraft had been:

Advertisement

previously owned by Gewan Airways, a company linked to a conglomerate controlled by the brother of UAE President Mohammed bin Zayed, and has previously been flagged for its role in supplying the RSF.

The other cargo plane:

is now operated by Invicta Air Cargo, a company established in 2025 in the Central African Republic by a UAE national. Despite attempts to obscure links, the company’s website reportedly connects back to Gewan Airways.

New Arab explained:

The flights suggest the UAE is expanding logistical routes through neighbouring countries, including Ethiopia, where it is reported to have established a training camp for RSF fighters in 2025.

Colonial shadow war

UAE has been a major backer of RSF in its war with the Sudanese government. Turkey, Egypt, Israel and many more countries are pursuing their own interests in Sudan too. British military components has also shown up on the battlefield in RSF hands. The UK is a major arms supplier to UAE.

As the Canary has said in our previous coverage of this poorly-understood genocidal war:

Advertisement

The war in Sudan is theoretically between the Arab supremacist RSF and the Sudanese government. But foreign states pursuing their own interests are backing the combatants. The United Arab Emirates (UAE), for example, backs the RSF with arms and equipment. Egypt backs the government, alongside Russia, Turkey, Iran, Saudi Arabia, and Qatar. Israel has backed both sides at different times.

The mounting death toll is similarly mindboggling:

RSF has killed Sudanese civilians in vast numbers. And some estimates say 150,000 people have died and over 10mn have been displaced by fighting.

UAE appears determined to keep arming its proxy force in Sudan despite the impacts of Iran’s strikes on Gulf states which harbour American infrastructure. Meanwhile, the people of Sudan find themselves living—and dying—at a nexus of competing local and colonial interests.

Featured image via the Canary

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Corbyn’s local election paralysis benefits the far-right

Published

on

Corbyn's local election paralysis benefits the far-right

Local elections are coming in fast, with just over six weeks until over 4,850 councillors will be up for election. Labour is justifiably fearing how they will fare as their lurch to the right has disgusted and alienated more left-wing voters. Meanwhile, Your Party still appears to be dithering.

The West is witnessing the rise of the far-right. Billionaires are eagerly funnelling funds into hateful parties like Reform, Advance, and Restore in the UK—all cut from the same cloth as the Canary has long been reporting. As a result, it is more critical than ever that communities have a socialist candidate to cut through the noise of the racist misinformation spread by right-wing politicians.

Despite announcing its formation nearly a year ago, Your Party is dragging its feet, risking leaving communities without a candidate to support. With far-right parties rising rapidly, fielding candidates is clearly achievable in this time frame—but the new party continues to dither.

This begs the question: is this really the best Corbyn and his team can do?

Advertisement

A likely sign of impending disappointment for its members, is Your Party’s failure to back Scottish candidates in the Holyrood elections:

Missed opportunity

The Canary has contacted Your Party and Central Executive Committee (CEC) member Louise Regan to ask whether the party will field official YP candidates in the upcoming local elections. On May 7, there will be 4,850 councillor seats up for election, set against the backdrop of an increasingly divisive political atmosphere.

Far-right parties like Reform and Restore UK have been hard at work inflaming divisions in our communities, actively targeting minoritised communities. Socialist groups across the country stand ready to challenge the far-right on the doorsteps. However with a seemingly silent and inactive YP they are left isolated as independent candidates with no party machine behind them.

Advertisement

Despite numerous groups and candidates appealing to YP for endorsement, they have received no response.

Mike Forster of PACE in Huddersfield believed he had Jeremy Corbyn’s support as a candidate. However, after requesting an endorsement over a week ago, he has received no response from YP. Nevertheless, they have registered with the Electoral Commission at their own expense, and will be able to stand candidates under the banner of PACE.

This failure on behalf of the CEC and the leadership of YP has had a devastating impact on morale among members.

We wrote yesterday about the formation of socialist pressure groups in response to this silence:

Advertisement

Despite the desperate need for unity, solidarity and compassion in British society, the reported behaviour of the CEC has been to silence or intimidate socialist voices into compliance.

Members are feeling increasingly concerned that Your Party will not work to empower them or listen to their communities. Instead, branches are left ignored without access to resources or guidance which has seen local members abandon the party all together in disappointment.

Change of tack from Your Party following uproar

The Canary has now seen an email issued to Your Party members in Scotland. This email follows the widespread anger after Niall Christie’s recent post confirming Scotland would not see candidates in the Holyrood elections. Christie blamed ‘inaction and decisions taken at a UK level’ for this abandonment of Scottish members.

Signalling a potential change of tack, YP are now offering members a choice in the matter:

 

 

 

Advertisement

 

 

 

 

Advertisement

 

 

 

 

Advertisement

 

 

 

A ‘Jeremy Corbyn fan club’

Nonetheless, time is flying, and if YP keeps dragging its feet, candidates will have even less time to campaign.

Advertisement

After all, wasn’t this meant to be an active, participatory democracy party?

So far, all the real action is happening at the grassroots, where socialist groups are organising themselves in the absence of Your Party. The executive, meanwhile, seem either unwilling or unmotivated to step up.

Toxic from day one

Your Party has been toxic from the very start—that’s undeniable. Yet the leadership blame whistleblowers and critics for these divisions, revealing the same predictable lack of humility and accountability.

Advertisement

Widespread reports show that Karie Murphy, Corbyn, and his allies strongly opposed Zarah Sultana’s involvement and the idea of co-leadership. As often happens when certain individuals dominate or bully, new groups formed, aligning more with shared principles and values than with the original central leadership.

Nonetheless, YP has seriously undermined how the experience of people across the country who have long been shut down or shut out. This no longer diminishes us into silence but fuels our drive to move forward.

Grassroots groups across the country are bursting with energy, collaboration, and solidarity—it’s truly inspiring. The collective efforts show us that socialism isn’t just an idea—it’s a much needed path towards national healing.

Featured image via the Canary

Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Conservatives Rebel Against GOP TSA Deal

Published

on

Conservatives Rebel Against GOP TSA Deal

!function(n){if(!window.cnx){window.cnx={},window.cnx.cmd=[];var t=n.createElement(‘iframe’);t.display=’none’,t.onload=function(){var n=t.contentWindow.document,c=n.createElement(‘script’);c.src=”//cd.connatix.com/connatix.player.js”,c.setAttribute(‘async’,’1′),c.setAttribute(‘type’,’text/javascript’),n.body.appendChild(c)},n.head.appendChild(t)}}(document);(new Image()).src=”https://capi.connatix.com/tr/si?token=19654b65-409c-4b38-90db-80cbdea02cf4″;cnx.cmd.push(function(){cnx({“playerId”:”19654b65-409c-4b38-90db-80cbdea02cf4″,”mediaId”:”ebf8b366-fa87-4aae-afc1-c2b1ab64e722″}).render(“69c30cffe4b081f8eb13798d”);});

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Politics Home | Sellafield Ltd backs groundbreaking digital hub to inspire West Cumbria’s next generation

Published

on

Politics Home Article | Nuclear project academy goes national

Sellafield Ltd joins forces with local partners and supply chain to fund the creation of LEVELS – a state-of-the-art digital centre in Whitehaven, West Cumbria.

Sellafield Ltd, through its SiX (social impact, multiplied) programme, has announced a major investment in LEVELS, a ground-breaking £4.6 million redevelopment of the former Whittles department store in Whitehaven, West Cumbria into a state-of-the-art immersive entertainment and education centre.

Delivered and developed by social impact property developers BEC, LEVELS has transformed a Grade II-listed building into a cutting-edge hub for digital creativity, learning, and interactive experiences.

Advertisement

Across 4 floors, the centre features immersive digital and gaming experiences, an esports arena, interactive learning spaces, and a café—creating a vibrant space for education and creativity in the heart of Whitehaven.

By equipping young people with the skills needed for a digital-first future, the project aims to engage young people, their families, and educators, inspiring the next generation to explore careers in digital and creative technology.

Funding for the project includes £3.3 million from Sellafield Ltd through its SiX programme, alongside £800,000 in funding, equipment, and logistical support from BT, Atos, and Openreach—as part of their social impact commitments through Information and Communications Technology contracts with Sellafield Ltd.

Advertisement

BEC has also contributed £500,000, demonstrating the power of partnership to multiply impact.

Tracey West, Sellafield Ltd’s head of social impact, said:

“LEVELS represents exactly what our SiX programme is about—creating lasting social impact by investing in skills, innovation, and opportunity. By collaborating with partners like BEC and our supply chain, we’re helping West Cumbria’s young people prepare for a digital future.

This investment builds on our long-standing commitment to improving education provision in West Cumbria, following projects such as West Lakes Academy, the Whitehaven Campus, the National College for Nuclear, and the Well programme.”

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Czech football association busts match fixing and betting ring

Published

on

Czech football association busts match fixing and betting ring

In an incident that has rocked Czech football, police arrested dozens of people in connection with fraud, betting and match-fixing on the morning of 24 March. These raids have been described as one of the biggest security operation targeted sports gambling in the country.

The iSport.cz website was the first to report the news, revealing that both sports players and referees were among those arrested. They also highlighted the involvement of top-division football clubs. This underscores the depth and breadth of corruption in the domestic football industry.

At a press conference held on the same day, Czech Football Association (CFA) President David Tronda delivered the following message:

The integrity of competitions is absolutely essential for us and represents one of the fundamental pillars of professional football. Any behavior that contradicts these principles is completely unacceptable for us. We will do our utmost to ensure that those found guilty are severely and exemplary punished.

Multi-agency cooperation

The latest raid was no spur-of-the-moment effort, but the result of a three-year investigation. It was a collaborative initiative involving international agencies, Europol, Interpol, and local authorities with experience in tackling organised criminal networks.

Advertisement

Trondo conceded in an internal memo that the raid may be the largest in the history of Czech football. He also confirmed the key role the Czech Football Association (CFA) played in the investigation, revealing that they had been working in close coordination with the police to expose years of corrupt betting and match-fixing practices.

According to the Czech News Agency (CTK), the National Center for Combating Organised Crime is overseeing criminal proceedings in the case. This is happening amidst a media blackout. Furthermore, spokesperson Jaroslav Ibehič clarified that the release of information is being handled exclusively by the Olomouc Prosecutor’s Office.

The rot runs deeper than suspected

There are 47 people now facing disciplinary investigation so far, Trunda said, on suspicion of betting fraud and match rigging.

This shows just how deep the corruption runs in a case that not only implicates first-division teams but also youth clubs—covering the full gamut.

Advertisement

Despite the seriousness of these developments, the federation emphasised that none of its officials have been found to be involved. They also confirmed that UEFA has been kept informed of the case’s progress.

Reputational blowback

The case, which is still unfolding, represents a significant blow to the reputation of Czech football. It marks the beginning of a critical and more difficult phase of rooting out the betting mafia. However, the lost trust in the sport could take years to rebuild.

As the investigation continues, questions loom over the scale of the network involved and the full extent of the sporting figures tied to it. With uncertainty surrounding the names that may be implicated.

This is shaping up to be one of the most explosive match-fixing scandals Europe has seen in recent years.

Advertisement

Featured image via the Canary

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Islamophobic attacks on the rise

Published

on

Islamophobic attacks on the rise

With depressing predictability, politicians are using the antisemitic Golders Green arson as an excuse to roll out Islamophobic rhetoric. Never mind the fact that we have no idea who carried out the attack – the knee-jerk bigotry is already in full swing.

Early in the morning of Monday 23 March, arsonists set fire to four ambulances owned by Jewish charity Hatzola. The Met issued a statement confirming that they’re treating the attack as an antisemitic hate crime.

The attack, which occurred in Golders Green, North London, caused several explosions when the fire hit the vehicles’ gas canisters. However, no casualties have been recorded as a consequence of the blasts.

Golders Green: Al Jazeera told to ‘go home’

Politicians and the general public alike have pivoted to Islamophobic and anti-Arab rhetoric almost immediately after the attack.

Advertisement

As a case in point, an Al Jazeera news crew had to leave the scene of the Golders Green attack after a crowd started chanting “go home” at them. Reuters footage shows one individual telling an Al Jazeera staffer:

Go take your briefcase, go take your Al Jazeera equipment and go. No one wants Al Jazeera here.

Alarming footage of the incident showed reporters being harassed out of the area:

The crowd later chanted “Al Jazeera off our streets”, “go home”, and “terrorists”.

Advertisement

After a police officer stated that “They’re reporting the news”, an onlooker said:

We feel threatened by Al Jazeera being here. We feel threatened. We don’t feel safe.

The reporting is going to go to potential terrorists. That’s why we don’t want to see that on our streets. For our safety, please remove them from our streets.

Of course, Al Jazeera also provides in-depth coverage of the frontline conflict in Gaza. At one point, the IDF closed Al Jazeera’s offices in Israel, alleging they were being used “to support terrorist activities.” Al Jazeera flatly denied the accusations, calling them:

an affront to press freedom and the very principles of journalism.

A number of journalists from Al Jazeera have been murdered during Israel’s concerted campaign to eliminate journalists reporting on their genocide.

Advertisement

What’s ‘intifada’ got to do with it?

And, in the House of Commons, right-wing politicians took the opportunity to conflate the attack with Islam and support for Palestine.

Chris Philp, the shadow home secretary, asked his counterpart Shabana Mahmood whether she believes that:

calls on our streets at marches for Jihad and Intifada are calls for violence, which fuel antisemitism, and does she agree they should no longer be allowed?

Note Philip’s attempt to conflate ‘jihad’ with ‘intifada’, the Arabic word for ‘uprising’. After the Bondi Beach attacks in Australia, Zionists around the world called for bans on the use of ‘intifada’, to varying success. At the time, the Canary wrote:

To decry the terrorist assault on Bondi beach as a manifestation of a globalised intifada is nothing short of a heinous smear.

It is a smear against anti-Zionist protesters across the world who use the phrase ‘globalise the intifada’ as a call to action against Israel’s genocide. That action is non-violent, and often carried out by anti-Zionist Jewish protestors. And yet still, it is conflated with terrorism at every turn.

Advertisement

Predictably, and despite the complete lack of any evidence, Philp also got in a call for more deportations:

And finally, will she ensure that all antisemites and extremists who are not British citizens get deported?

Because why stop at Islamophobia when you could also chuck in some anti-migrant sentiment?

‘Terror cell embedded in North London’

Following suit, far-right leader Nigel Farage took to social media to whip up fear:

What I want to hear, what the whole country wants to hear, given we now have a terror cell embedded in North London, what I want to hear is that you are proscribing as a terrorist organisation the IRGC.

The IRGC refers to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, part of the Iranian military. Again, note that Farage is doing precisely what counter-terror police have warned against, pinning the attack on Iran.

Advertisement

Likewise, he’s calling for the proscription of the military of a country currently being attacked illegally by his mate Trump. And, notably, the IRCG is not the group that claimed responsibility for the attack in Golders Green.

It’s also worth bearing in mind that Farage only cares about antisemitism when it can be used to attack Islam and the Arab world. He has repeatedly denied claiming that “Hitler was right”, in spite of multiple witnesses coming forwards. Likewise, he later made thousands selling videos to neo-Nazis. 

Now, none of this is to say that HAYI wasn’t responsible for the Golders Green attacks. This claim hasn’t been confirmed; it isn’t something we know one way or the other. Likewise, authorities have also stated that they aren’t yet convinced of the Iranian state’s responsibility or involvement.

However, it’s a depressingly common occurrence that any antisemitic attack in the UK is immediately weaponised by cynical, bigoted politicians. In one breath, they condemn antisemitism and then immediately employ dog-whistle Islamophobic, anti-Arab and anti-migrant rhetoric.

Advertisement

We see them, we know what they’re doing, and we won’t stand for their weaponisation of hatred.

Featured image via the Canary

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025