Connect with us

Politics

The crisis-hit Tories need good advice. Will they really get it from Michael Gove’s Spectator? | Archie Bland

Published

on

If there were any ambitious journalists on the right who still thought that the best route to the top runs through the newsroom, it may be time for them to start looking for a safe seat. Consider the evidence. George Osborne’s stint at the Evening Standard didn’t do much for the editorial reputation of former ministers; the Conservatives have since been comprehensively told where to go by the electorate. It doesn’t matter. Whether as columnists or podcasters, radio hosts or GB News fulminators, Tory grandees who believe that the public just wants to hear more from them continue to blight the media.

The latest is Michael Gove, who has been appointed editor of the Spectator by the magazine’s new owner, the GB News and UnHerd boss, Paul Marshall. Gove will take over on 8 October, just in time to direct the Spectator’s coverage of the business end of the Conservative leadership contest, and perhaps to endorse whichever of the final four candidates – Robert Jenrick, Kemi Badenoch, James Cleverly and Tom Tugendhat – he favours when they set out their stalls at party conference next week.

News of Marshall’s purchase comes at a difficult time for the Conservatives’ ailing realist faction, who already resemble compass salesmen at a meeting of the Flat Earth Society. In fairness, though, editing a magazine of Tory ideas isn’t very much like editing a daily London newspaper, and Gove looks a more serious appointment than Osborne ever did: as Fraser Nelson, Gove’s departing predecessor, pointed out in a letter to readers, he’s a “journalist who took a detour into politics and not (as so often happens) the other way around”. Meanwhile, Gove seems too invested in his image as a freethinking renegade to allow himself to be a total patsy.

While he has been cast as Badenoch’s mentor in the past, and endorsed her in the early stages of the 2022 contest, he is surely too canny an operator to adopt the kind of slavish coverage that would allow him to be presented as her surrogate. Where Osborne responded to a message from Matt Hancock “calling in a favour” for an upbeat front page on Covid tests by saying, “I’ll tell the team to splash it,” Gove’s cover stories are likely to piss off as many frontbenchers as they please.

Advertisement

If he is allowed to edit as he sees fit, that is. It is perhaps too early to conclude that Marshall dropped £100m on the leading magazine of the right merely to impose his own worldview, and the Spectator – for all its history of publishing writers hailing from considerably beyond the pale – is still a publication with space for views from the more moderate right. Its journalists, who are intensely loyal to Nelson, nonetheless say they are reassured by the appointment of the magazine’s former editor Charles Moore as chairman with a remit to protect editorial independence. And Tim Montgomerie, the founding editor of UnHerd, has said that Marshall has never interfered with the editorial direction.

On the other hand, £100m is a lot for a magazine that had profits of £2.6m in 2022: however optimistic Marshall is about mooted expansions in the US and Australia, if he just wanted to make money, he would have stuck to his hedge fund. His pursuit of the Telegraph suggests that he wants to be the dominant owner on the right of the British media – and he surely has designs on being something more than a compere. If Marshall’s purported approval on social media of calls for the mass expulsion of migrants and descriptions of Muslim immigration as “Islamic conquest” are any guide, Gove’s editorship may not be the high-minded examination of the Tories’ best route back to power that he probably hopes it will be.

That is all the more significant because of the shape of the rest of the rightwing media, with the Spectator standing alongside ConservativeHome and Substackers such as John Oxley as one of the few places you can still find the party challenged from within its own ranks. The most popular Tory publications, the ones read by most of the members, appear to have very little incentive to set out a serious path to victory.

A survey of how past leadership contests have unfolded in the wider rightwing press suggests how much has changed. Once upon a time, it was a pretty broad church: the Daily Mail endorsed Kenneth Clarke against Iain Duncan Smith in 2001, asking its readers if it was “better to belong to a small rightwing faction that is characterised by the purity of its opposition to Europe but faces years in the wilderness?”. So did the Spectator, under the editorship of one Boris Johnson.

Advertisement

Duncan Smith nonetheless drew support from the Telegraph and others to win the leadership. But after his defenestration and then the party’s defeat under Michael Howard in 2005, the Tories’ media supporters collectively decided that they had seen enough of their navel. The Telegraph, the Mail, the Sun, the Times and the Spectator – Johnson again, with an eye on returning to the frontbench – all backed David Cameron over David Davis, accepting him, in the words of the Telegraph’s leader column, as a “natural winner”.

If both those cases suggest an appetite for challenging the instinct to prioritise ideological comfort over electability, the Liz Truss-Rishi Sunak contest of two years ago did not go that way. With the honourable exception of the Times, just about the only paper to have stood still as the party veered ever rightwards, every newspaper that backed the Tories in 2019 endorsed Truss. The Telegraph said she “looked and sounded competent and proficient”, while the Mail thought she had “boldness, imagination and strength of conviction”. These pieces are very funny to read now, but they looked plainly wrong even at the time – to Nelson’s Spectator, for example, which warned Truss: “To attempt reform without a proper plan is to guarantee failure.”

Nor have the Mail and the Telegraph, or their sister Sunday papers, made any accommodation with reality since the election. You don’t need a political science degree to understand why not. The Brexit vote and subsequent Tory meltdown have deprived the right of its most effective betrayal myths, forcing the creation of still more implausible narratives of disfranchisement: Reform doesn’t get enough airtime, Truss and Johnson were unfairly treated, and the “blob” is all leftwing anyway.

Meanwhile, one-nation Conservatives are either dying or leaving the party. With the parallel decline in paying readership making competition more ferocious than ever, strategies for commercial survival and for bringing the Tories back to power will often pull an editor in different directions. When they come into conflict, the former will always prevail.

Advertisement

The irony is that the success Marshall has bought into at the Spectator has been built on resisting these tendencies – and the best insulation against any change in approach before the new leader is chosen may be just how jarring it would be. Gove’s own heavyweight status also affords some protection. But over time, it seems inconceivable that his boss won’t have some thoughts on the best way forward. As Tim Montgomerie also said, of Marshall’s attempt to buy the Telegraph: “He wants to shape the wider culture, so he is investing because of a political agenda.”

That may not mean a column for Lee Anderson. But if anyone is expecting someone like Gove to fend off the forces of populism on his own, it might be time for them to think again. A compass that points true north isn’t much use, after all, if your fellow travellers think it leads off the edge of the world.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Politics

Labour MP Mike Amesbury filmed punching man to the ground in Cheshire | Labour

Published

on

Footage has emerged of a Labour MP punching a man to the ground and then hitting him several more times.

A video published by the Mail shows Mike Amesbury, the MP for Runcorn and Helsby, hitting the man in the face and knocking him to the floor, before standing over him and aiming six more blows at his head.

The security camera footage also shows Amesbury shouting: “You won’t threaten me again, will you?”

Amesbury said in a statement on Saturday night: “Last night I was involved in an incident that took place after I felt threatened on the street following an evening with friends. This morning I contacted Cheshire police myself to report what happened during this incident.

Advertisement

“I will not be making further comment but will, of course, cooperate with any inquiries if required by Cheshire police.”

After an initial video showing the aftermath of the altercation was published on Saturday night, a Labour spokesperson said: “We are aware of an incident that took place last night. We understand that Mike Amesbury MP approached Cheshire police to report what happened this morning himself and that he will cooperate with any inquiries they have.”

The education secretary, Bridget Phillipson, refused to say on Sunday whether Amesbury would have the whip suspended while police investigated.

“Mike Amesbury is cooperating fully with the police,” she said. “He’s gone forward himself to the police, and it is right that the police now look into this matter, investigate and decide what action, if any, is required.”

Advertisement

Officials did not respond on Sunday after footage emerged of the incident.

Cheshire constabulary said in a statement: “At 2.48am on Saturday 26 October, police were called to reports of an assault in Frodsham. A caller reported he had been assaulted by a man in Main Street. Enquiries are ongoing.”

skip past newsletter promotion

The footage shows Amesbury talking to the man at 2.15am in the Cheshire town of Frodsham. Shortly after the man looks away, Amesbury punches him with enough force to knock him to the ground, before standing over him and hitting him repeatedly as a third man tries to prise him away.

Amesbury was a shadow minister in the housing department before the election but was not given a government job after the party came to power. He won his seat with a majority of nearly 15,000 ahead of the second-placed party, Reform UK.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Labour backbenchers accuse Keir Starmer of ‘colonial mindset’ | Labour

Published

on

Three prominent Labour backbenchers have accused Keir Starmer of an “insulting” and “colonial mindset” over his reluctance to discuss reparations for the transatlantic slave trade.

Ahead of a summit of the Commonwealth heads of government in Samoa last week, the prime minister rejected calls to discuss reparations with Caribbean and African nations, with No 10 insisting it was “not on the agenda”.

Starmer said slavery was “abhorrent” but his stance was “looking forward rather than looking backwards”, adding that he wanted to focus on discussing “current future-facing challenges” at the summit instead of “very long, endless discussions about reparations on the past”.

On Sunday the Labour MP Bell Ribeiro-Addy addressed a cross-party reparations conference in London, saying it was “very insulting [to] tell people of African descent to forget and move forward”.

Advertisement

“Reparations are not about relitigating historic injustices, they are about remedying the deep-rooted inequalities that still shape our world today,” she said. “At a time when there is growing awareness of how racial hierarchies that endure to this day were constituted to justify the enslavement and colonisation of African peoples, state-led action on reparations is sadly lacking.”

Another Labour MP, Clive Lewis, said it was surprising Starmer had thought he could take a “colonial mindset” to the summit and “dictate what could and could not be discussed”.

Diane Abbott, the first Black woman to become an MP, co-chaired the conference in London. She said the Labour party previously had plans to establish a national reparations commission but Starmer “seems to have forgotten that”.

“Reparations isn’t about the past, it is about the here and now,” she said. “The descendants of African slaves and colonised peoples continue to suffer from the consequences generations later.

Advertisement

“Real reparations aren’t just about compensation, they’re a way of tackling colonialism’s damaging legacy of racism and inequality. They are about the total system change and repair needed to heal, empower and restore dignity.”

At the conclusion of the Commonwealth heads of government meeting (Chogm), the leaders resolved that “the time has come” for a conversation on reparatory justice.

A document signed by the 56 leaders, including Starmer, stated it was time for a “meaningful, truthful and respectful conversation” about justice for the transatlantic trade in enslaved Africans and chattel enslavement, with the aim of forging “a common future based on equity”.

Ribeiro-Addy, who chairs the all-party parliamentary group for Afrikan Representation, said: “I’m very proud those nations refused to be silenced.”

Advertisement

In a press conference after the summit, Starmer downplayed the significance of the paragraph in the document that called for a conversation about reparatory justice, telling reporters it was a small part of “quite a long communique”.

“None of the discussions have been about money. Our position is very, very clear in relation to that,” he said. He added that the issue would be revisited when a delegation of Caribbean nations visits the UK next year.

Last week, amid mounting pressure, a source in No 10 told the Guardian that the UK could support some forms of reparatory justice, such as restructuring financial institutions and providing debt relief.

“There is a general sense that these multilateral institutions give out loans to developing countries then charge large interest rates for repayments,” the source said.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

CCTV appears to show Labour MP punching man to the ground

Published

on

CCTV appears to show Labour MP punching man to the ground

CCTV footage has emerged appearing to show Labour MP Mike Amesbury punching a man to the ground.

In footage obtained by the Daily Mail, the Runcorn and Helsby MP is apparently seen continuing to hit the man as he lies in the street.

It comes after a different video, posted on X, purported to show Amesbury shouting and swearing at the man lying in the street in Frodsham, Cheshire.

In that clip, Amesbury can be heard shouting: “You won’t threaten the MP ever again, will you?”

Advertisement

Both Amesbury and the Labour Party have been contacted for their response.

It is not clear what happened in the build-up to the moments caught on film.

In a statement issued before the Daily Mail footage emerged, Cheshire Police said: “At 02:48 BST on Saturday 26 October police were called to reports of an assault in Frodsham.

“A caller reported he had been assaulted by a man in Main Street. Enquiries are ongoing.”

Advertisement

Posting on his own Facebook page on Saturday, the 55-year-old backbencher said: “Last night I was involved in an incident that took place after I felt threatened following an evening out with friends.

“This morning I contacted Cheshire Police myself to report what happened.

“I will not be making any further public comment but will of course cooperate with any inquiries if required by Cheshire Police.”

Amesbury has been a Labour MP in Cheshire since 2017 and served as a shadow minister between 2018 and 2024.

Advertisement

In the July general election he won his constituency with a majority of 14,696.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Cutting off Unrwa would deeply harm Israel’s reputation, says UK minister | Foreign policy

Published

on

Israel’s reputation as a democracy would be “deeply harmed” if the Knesset pressed ahead with bills this week that would end all Israeli government cooperation with the Palestinian relief agency Unrwa, the UK’s Middle East minister has said.

Hamish Falconer said such a move at a time when the humanitarian crisis in Gaza was catastrophic and worsening would “neither be in Israel’s interest or realistic”.

His remarks are the strongest criticism yet by a western government minister of the legislation, which could be voted on as early as this week unless the Israeli prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, intervenes.

He was speaking as a joint statement was released from seven European foreign ministries, including the UK’s, urging Israel to drop the proposed bill, saying: “It is crucial that Unrwa and other UN organisations be fully able to deliver humanitarian aid and their assistance to those who need it most, fulfilling their mandates effectively.”

Advertisement

Falconer demanded that more aid be allowed to enter Gaza and said too many civilians were being killed in Israeli attacks on Hamas in Gaza. He was speaking at a conference in London convened by the Israeli newspaper Haaretz.

Falconer said the measures taken by the Labour government so far did not indicate any decline in Labour support for the state of Israel, but his remarks were as sharp as any delivered by a Labour minister.

He said: “We are deeply concerned by legislation currently under consideration by the Israeli Knesset which would critically undermine Unrwa. It is neither in Israel’s interest nor realistic.

“Given the agency’s vital role in delivering aid and essential services at a time when more aid should be getting into Gaza, it is deeply harmful to Israel’s international reputation as a democratic country that its lawmakers are taking steps that would make the delivering of food, water, medicines and healthcare more difficult.”

Advertisement

He added: “The international community are clear that Unrwa and other humanitarian organisations must be fully able to deliver aid.”

Many Israelis regard Unrwa as too closely linked with Hamas and also committed to the Palestinian refugees’ right of return.

Falconer, who has recently been to the Egypt-Gaza border, said humanitarian access to Gaza remained wholly inadequate. “I saw for myself thousands of trucks waiting to cross the border,” he said. “Some had been there for months. There were warehouses full of life-saving items – medical equipment, sleeping bags and tarpaulin for the winter. There have been repeated attacks on humanitarian convoys and the level of aid getting in is far too low.”

He challenged Israel’s military tactics inside Gaza, saying: “Hamas is a brutal terrorist organisation, it hides behind Gazan civilians, but all parties must do everything possible to protect civilians and fully respect international humanitarian law.”

Advertisement

He said Israel “must protect civilians even if it means making difficult choices. All too often in the pursuit of Hamas we have seen civilians pay the price. The Israeli government must take all necessary precautions to avoid civilian casualties, to ensure aid can flow into Gaza and freely through all humanitarian land routes.”

Falconer also said: “As long as there is little accountability for settler violence, the government will consider further actions.”

Warning that the risk of further escalation could not be exaggerated, he called for calmer heads to prevail and urged Iran not to retaliate for Saturday’s Israeli attack. The death of the Hamas leader Yahya Sinwar presented an opportunity for a new chapter, he said, and no military solution existed to the crisis.

Speaking at the same event via video link, the former UK prime minister Tony Blair said: “Hamas cannot be allowed to continue to govern Gaza, and Israel will need to pull back to allow the development of a different governance structure for Gaza that would then enable reconstruction to take place.”

Advertisement

Blair said he knew that many in Israel doubted Gaza could ever be run differently, and many assumed a “higher level of support for Hamas than exists in reality”.

He said polls commissioned in August by the Tony Blair Institute showed that the most popular choice was an administration of Gaza representatives with international oversight and linked to the Palestinian Authority. He said the poll showed that in the West Bank there was strong agreement behind moderate to deep reform of the Palestinian Authority.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Education secretary ‘open minded’ on England smacking ban

Published

on

Is Reform UK's plan to get Farage into No 10 mission impossible?
Getty Images Little girl with bunches looking out a large window, inside a green wooden hut. Getty Images

The education secretary has said she is “open minded” to a ban on smacking children in England, but that there are no imminent plans to change the law.

It comes after fresh calls for a ban in England by Children’s Commissioner Dame Rachel de Souza, who suggested adopting similar measures already in place in Scotland and Wales.

Asked if she supports that proposal, Bridget Phillipson told the BBC’s Laura Kuenssberg that the government is “considering it” but legislation would not be brought forward “any time soon”.

Children’s charity the NSPCC called on new legislation “as soon as possible” as there was “mounting evidence” that physically disciplining children could be “damaging”.

Speaking on Sunday morning, Phillipson said she was keen to hear from Dame Rachel and other experts “on how [a ban] would work”.

Advertisement

She added that she thought “we do need to look at how we keep children safe”.

Phillipson added that the upcoming Children’s Wellbeing Bill, which is expected to be introduced “by the end of the year”, will address many of the issues relating to children’s care and safeguarding.

Anna Edmundson, head of policy at the NSPCC, told the BBC that calls had tripled to the charity’s helpline from adults concerned about the use of physical punishment on children.

In a statement she added: “That is why we want the Government to legislate as soon as possible to give children in England the same protection from assault afforded to adults and already in place for children in Scotland and Wales.”

Advertisement

Other charities, including Barnardo’s, have also long called for an English smacking ban and two-thirds of English people polled by YouGov in March last year said physically disciplining a child is not acceptable.

Bridget Phillipson appears on set with Laura Kuenssberg. They are both sitting on red chairs and appear to be talking. The Education Secretary wears a dark pink dress with a memorial poppy pin attached.

Bridget Phillipson on Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg

In England and Northern Ireland it is legal for a carer or parent to discipline their child physically if it is a “reasonable” punishment – but the Children Act 2004 made it illegal to assault a child causing actual or grievous bodily harm.

The previous Conservative government argued parents should be trusted to discipline their children and there were “clear laws in place” to prevent violence.

The Department for Education told the BBC earlier this week that it was now “looking closely” at the law changes made in Scotland and Wales, which came into force in 2020 and 2022 respectively, to see whether more could be done in England.

Advertisement

Posting on X last week, Dame Rachel said a ban on any kind of corporal punishment, including smacking, hitting, slapping and shaking, could stop lower level violence from escalating.

“If we are serious about keeping every child safe, it’s time England takes this necessary step,” she said.

“Too many children have been harmed or killed at the hands of the people who should love and care for them most.”

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

David Amess’s daughter says Prevent anti-terror scheme ‘isn’t fit for purpose’ | UK security and counter-terrorism

Published

on

The daughter of the murdered MP David Amess has criticised Home Office failures that meant her father’s killer was unmonitored for years before the attack, saying the Prevent programme “isn’t fit for purpose”.

Speaking to the Sunday Times, Katie Amess condemned the fact her father’s killer was known to authorities but his case was closed due to “an admin error”.

“We know the guy did it,” said Katie. “I just want to know how and why he was allowed to … What has been changed to ensure that this never happens again and that another family doesn’t have to go through the absolute heartbreak and trauma that has just shattered our world?

“My father gave 40 years of his life, day in, day out, to his people and his country. He is owed the decency and the respect to find out where he was failed.”

Advertisement

Ali Harbi Ali was convicted of stabbing Amess to death on 15 October 2021 at a church in Leigh-on-Sea, Essex, where the Conservative MP had been holding an advice surgery for people in his Southend West constituency.

It was later revealed that Ali had been referred to the government’s anti-radicalisation Prevent programme, and then for more intensive support through the Channel counter-terrorism programme before his case was closed. He went on to spend at least two years researching which MP to murder.

He told police he had carried out the killing because he was angered by western actions in Syria and saw himself as a soldier of Islamic State.

Katie Amess says the family was told ‘an admin error’ meant her father’s killer was left unmonitored. Photograph: Geoff Pugh/Shutterstock

Katie Amess said the family were told Ali’s case was not followed up in the programme “due to an admin error” that meant a second meeting with the then 18-year-old did not take place.

Advertisement

The newspaper reported that Lincoln Brookes, the senior coroner for Essex, said there had been “some shortcomings” in the Prevent programme and Ali’s case was closed even though problems had not been addressed.

Brookes said “record-keeping is problematic and the rationale for certain decisions was not explicit” and “an opportunity to assess whether or not any progress had been made was missed”.

However, the coroner concluded the programme would not necessarily have prevented the attack and that it “would be speculative to assume that national security services do, should or could, detect and track every Islamic State sympathiser”.

Amess’s family pushed for an inquest to consider the state’s failings in the run-up to Ali’s attack, but in July Brookes ruled there was not enough evidence to justify holding one.

Advertisement

Katie Amess, an actor who lives in California, said she had been diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder, while her mother, Julia, 70, who was married to Amess for nearly 40 years, moved out of the family home of three decades in Southend because it was too painful to stay.

“It’s just the most unbearable, unspeakable pain. We’ve lost a great, great man who can’t be replaced. Now I just want to make him proud by fighting back against being told no to something that we should be allowed to know. I can’t accept this,” she said.

“He was reported. People were trying to help us. And so why was he allowed to just go on and do whatever he wanted for seven years? What happened to my dad should not have been an admin error.”

The family wants greater protection for all MPs and is pushing for more answers about what happened to Amess, and how his killer evaded authorities for so long.

Advertisement

“It’s pretty obvious that Prevent isn’t fit for purpose, it has consistently failed people,” Katie Amess said. “It failed me. It failed my family catastrophically, it failed the public and also it failed other members of parliament.”

A Home Office spokesperson said: “Our thoughts continue to be with Sir David Amess’ family and friends. The attack on Sir David Amess was an awful tragedy, the safety of members of parliament is paramount and significant work has been taken forward in response to his tragic killing.

“Prevent is a vital tool to stop people from becoming terrorists or supporting terrorism and tackles all ideological causes of terrorism.”

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 WordupNews.com