Connect with us

Politics

The Things People From Big Families Bring Up In Therapy The Most

Published

on

“In larger families, you're dealing with multiple relationships, shifting alliances, and sometimes strained connections between different members,” one expert explained.

As much as being an only child can present with its own list of issues in adulthood, growing up in a big family isn’t always the rosy picture it is sometimes made out to be.

Whether you had lots of siblings or step-siblings, or even cousins or grandparents, living with you, it makes sense: when you’re dealing with lots of different people, things can get complicated.

Either there are tons of different personalities that can clash and overshadow one another, or there’s a really strong family culture that makes it hard to embrace your individuality.

A vast majority of us can benefit from therapy, but when it comes to people who grew up in big families, there’s a specific set of issues that therapists see them bring up in sessions again and again.

Advertisement

We spoke to two psychology experts to find out what these are, how they play out, and how people from big families can work through them.

“In larger families, you're dealing with multiple relationships, shifting alliances, and sometimes strained connections between different members,” one expert explained.

xavierarnau via Getty Images

“In larger families, you’re dealing with multiple relationships, shifting alliances, and sometimes strained connections between different members,” one expert explained.

1. They may struggle with complex family dynamics

Show us one family that doesn’t have at least some tension come up during big gatherings, please.

“In larger families, you’re dealing with multiple relationships, shifting alliances, and sometimes strained connections between different members,” Saba Harouni Lurie, marriage and family therapist and founder of Take Root Therapy, tells HuffPost. “As adults, this complexity can make family gatherings feel overwhelming or create guilt about being closer to some siblings than others.”

Advertisement

When adults who grew up in large families begin to do self-reflection work, they may find they have some big decisions to make about how to deal with family – and even whether they may need to cut ties with certain (or all) members.

“Part of the work in therapy is learning to accept that you don’t need equal closeness with everyone,” Harouni Lurie said. “We also look at setting boundaries around which events feel manageable and sometimes having direct conversations with family members about what actually works for you.”

2. They may deal with family ‘hierarchies’

Closely related to issues of family dynamics is the issue of “hierarchies” within families, where some people are the loudest and have the most influence over other family members, while others fade into the background.

Advertisement

“For those at the ‘top’ of the hierarchy, this power may be difficult to see, or they may view themselves as a well-meaning or deserved leader,” Candice O’Neil, a counselling psychologist in the U.K. and founder of Ontic Psychology, told HuffPost.

“For those nearer the bottom, it may be experienced as feeling dismissed or diminished; it may lead to their achievements or opinions being seen as less valid or notable than those of individuals nearer the top of the hierarchy.”

The way forward, according to O’Neil, is for each family member, regardless of their position in the food chain, to expand their horizons outside the family unit with friends, peer groups, co-workers, etc.

“This may be uncomfortable for family members near the top of the hierarchy, who may be used to their voice carrying a lot of weight, while for those nearer the bottom it can lead to increased recognition and help them see other ways of being,” O’Neil said.

Advertisement

“In both situations, expanding the family members’ horizons with interactions outside the family unit can help them either listen to less favoured family members more, or help them find ways to convey their opinions to family members further up the hierarchy.”

3. They may crave the attention they didn’t get growing up

It’s only human – the more children parents have, the thinner their attention is spread. It’s not the parents’ fault and it can lead to adult children experiencing difficulties related to not having received the amount of attention they needed as kids.

“When there are many kids competing for limited parental attention, children may develop strategies to stand out,” Harouni Lurie said. “Sometimes it’s through achievement and perfectionism, other times through acting out or risky behaviours. What brings people to therapy isn’t always this core issue, but as we work together, they often realise they’re still operating from that childhood place of trying to be noticed.”

Advertisement

Unfortunately, over time these coping strategies can lead to burnout, a lack of self-esteem, and difficulties in relationships.

“The healing process looks different for everyone, but it usually starts with recognising these patterns and understanding where they came from,” Harouni Lurie said. “Then we work on separating your worth from the need to stand out or perform.”

People raised in large families might not be aware of the dynamics they've picked up to gain approval or attention: “Sometimes it's through achievement and perfectionism, other times through acting out or risky behaviors," one expert said.

Holger Leue via Getty Images

People raised in large families might not be aware of the dynamics they’ve picked up to gain approval or attention: “Sometimes it’s through achievement and perfectionism, other times through acting out or risky behaviors,” one expert said.

4, They may struggle to set boundaries

In large families, it’s not uncommon for boundaries to be incredibly porous. “Everyone’s in everyone else’s business, which creates a strong safety net but can make it really hard to develop your own identity or make choices that differ from family expectations,” Harouni Lurie said.

Advertisement

“There’s often this deep sense of duty and obligation that makes it difficult to prioritise your own needs. Adults from these families may struggle with guilt when making independent decisions or feel suffocated by family expectations.”

In these cases, therapy work will consist in practicing setting gentle boundaries that honour who you are as an individual without feeling super guilty for it.

5. Or they may crave more connection

You know how sometimes it’s loneliest in a crowd? Ditto with large families. “You’d think a big family means automatic connection, but some people grow up feeling isolated within the crowd,” Harouni Lurie said.

Advertisement

Here, “the therapeutic work involves identifying what healthy boundaries look like for you specifically” and it may mean asking for more connection from family members and finding out whether they are willing to meet you there.

“Sometimes people also need space to grieve the family dynamic they wished they had while building the one that’s actually sustainable,” adds Harouni Lurie.

6. They may struggle to form an individual identity

In families that have a strong collective identity and preferred way of doing things, it can be really difficult for individuals to distinguish themselves and find out who they really are – because it could cost them connection.

Advertisement

“It is important for an individual to be clear on what family means to them and to consider how much they want to integrate within the family dynamic,” O’Neil said.

“They may consider if differences can be acknowledged and embraced in a way that feels manageable. Can the family learn to be more accepting of individual differences in the wider social realm due to their own experiences?”

The expert advises individual family members focus on their own interests and relationships outside of the family unit to get a stronger sense of who they are.

Progress within a big family may also mean “being curious about who each family member is as an individual and what makes them unique,” O’Neil continued. “It can help to facilitate discussions where this can be explored, but someone can also share who they are and put boundaries in place and acknowledge their limitations. Constructive communication is key.”

Advertisement
One struggle people raised in large families can have is understanding who they are on an individual level, especially if that individuality was never encouraged or embraced by the rest of the family.

middelveld via Getty Images

One struggle people raised in large families can have is understanding who they are on an individual level, especially if that individuality was never encouraged or embraced by the rest of the family.

7. They may present with generational trauma

When there’s been a lot of hurt in previous generations and an unwillingness to go to therapy or do any kind of self-work due to stigma and other factors, this leads to passed-down trauma that accentuates with each new generation.

Generational trauma “is felt deeply by the individual and can manifest in serious emotional and physical consequences that can persist into later life,” O’Neil said.

When multiple family members are affected, they can also trigger one another easily when they interact, deepening the hurt.

Advertisement

“It is important to have compassion, empathy and understanding for each other as individuals, but it is key to gently initiate conversations where boundaries are initiated for future interactions that respect lived experiences and selfhood,” O’Neil said.

“I advocate for individuals to seek professional therapy and practice self-compassion around those painful lived experiences. Journaling is also a great way to express feelings without being inhibited by how something lands with another person involved.”

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics

Newslinks for Tuesday 24th of February 2026

Published

on

Newslinks for Friday 30th January 2026

Mandelson released after arrest over suspicion of sharing information with Epstein

“Lord Mandelson has been released on bail after he was arrested for allegedly passing secret government information to the paedophile financier Jeffrey Epstein. He was pictured letting himself back into his London home in the early hours of Tuesday morning. A police statement said: “A 72-year-old man arrested on suspicion of misconduct in public office has been released on bail pending further investigation”. The former ambassador to the US was taken into custody by the Metropolitan Police on Monday afternoon as part of their criminal investigation into claims that he leaked market-sensitive government documents and insider information during his time as business secretary. He has been arrested on suspicion of misconduct in public office, an offence that carries a maximum sentence of life in prison. He has previously denied any wrongdoing and said that he did not act for financial gain. Sir Keir Starmer faces questions about his political judgment in appointing Mandelson as ambassador despite knowing about Mandelson’s links to Epstein. The prime minister has said that Mandelson misled him about the extent of their friendship. Mandelson was arrested only days before a by-election in Gorton & Denton, in Manchester, that is considered crucial for Labour.”  – The Times

  • Mandelson released from custody after being arrested – Daily Telegraph
  • Peter Mandelson arrested on suspicion of misconduct in public office – FT
  • Peter Mandelson arrested by Met Police – Spectator
  • Mandelson is released on bail after being quizzed by Scotland Yard’s elite ‘Celeb Squad’: Questions over what prompted ‘unusual’ 4.30pm arrest at disgraced Lord’s £7m home 17 days after his properties were searched over links to Epstein – Daily Mail
  • No special favours for Lord Mandelson in police custody – Daily Telegraph
  • Peter Mandelson arrested on suspicion of misconduct in public office – Guardian
  • Labour’s Peter Mandelson released on bail after sensational arrest – Daily Express
  • Mandy Released. Peter Mandelson released on bail and arrives home at 2am after being held by Met cops for 9 hours over Epstein files – The Sun
  • ‘Dear Gordon’ email was in Epstein’s inbox 38 minutes after reaching PM – Daily Telegraph
  • Mystery over Mandelson arrest 17 days after his homes were searched as ex-cop asks ‘what made Met change their mind?’ –  Sun

COMMENT

  • Mandelson’s downfall leaves New Labour in the dock – Ben Riley-Smith, Daily Telegraph
  • Mandelson’s downfall is one of fastest ever seen in British public life – Matthew Weaver, The Guardian
  • Why was Peter Mandelson arrested? Epstein files reveal key theories – Steven Swinford, Oliver Wright, The Times

Embattled Starmer goes to Gorton and Denton for last minute by-election push

“Sir Keir Starmer has staked his personal credibility on Labour winning a pivotal by-election by making his first visit to the constituency days before voters go to the polls. The prime minister warned that a Reform UK victory would cause the seat of Gorton & Denton to “descend into hostility” with a rise in community tensions. He had refused to say whether he would visit the seat and some senior Labour figures raised concerns that he could do more harm than good by doing so. However, Labour is increasingly optimistic that it will win the by-election by convincing undecided voters to back Labour rather than the Greens in a bid to stop Reform UK. While the seat is a three-way battle between Labour, Reform and the Greens, the prime minister is attempting to depict it as a “straight fight” between Labour and Reform.Starmer said: “The battle here is that basic battle between a party that wants to bring our communities together to make sure that everybody in this constituency has their voice heard in parliament through their brilliant Labour candidate, or a party that couldn’t really care less where the constituency is, just wants to use it as a platform for hatred and division and tearing people apart.” – The Times

  • Gorton will descend into hostility if Reform wins, claims Starmer – Daily Telegraph
  • The letter that reveals Starmer knows his leadership is under threat – The i
  • Now loony Greens call for free-for-all on prostitution and porn as by-election nears – Daily Mail
  • Fresh nightmare for Keir Starmer as Labour minister faces ethics probe – Daily Express
  • Sleazy does it. Labour minister is probed by No10 ethics chief for ‘ordering dirty dossier on journalists’ – The Sun
  • Watch: Labour MP’s ‘dark shit’ jibe – Spectator
  • Police calls and ‘dodgy’ leaflets: inside the ‘toxic’ Gorton and Denton by-election – The i

Comment

  • Labour’s by-election panic has triggered a full-blown identity crisis – Tom Harris, Daily Telegraph

‘Let me explain!’ Badenoch tells Lewis, who later apologises for ‘talking over her’ in fiery clash over student loans

“Kemi Badenoch slammed Martin Lewis for talking over her during a fiery clash over student loans. The Tory leader had been discussing repayment plans on Good Morning Britain when the interview was gate-crashed by the money expert. Ms Badenoch was initially being quizzed by hosts Ed Balls and Suzanna Reid over her party’s plans to reform the repayment system this morning. But the trio were visibly taken aback when Mr Lewis unexpectedly stormed onto set to grill the opposition leader over the policy. The TV star interrupted the interview, calling on Ms Badenoch to focus on increasing the salary threshold at which repayments start. During the fiery debate, she found herself involved in a shouting match with former Labour minister Mr Balls and the money expert. Ms Badenoch snapped: “If you want us to have a debate I’m very happy for us to have a debate. “I think people need to know what it is I am talking about, you’re both talking over me, excuse me, let me explain what my policy is.” Mr Balls then apologised to the Tory leader, before she continued to defend the policy and even offered to discuss options with Mr Lewis. She added: ‘I want to make sure that those young people who are paying and paying and their debt is not going down get a relief.” “If you think there is a better offer, let’s look at it. “The whole student loan system is not working properly and someone has to do something.” Viewers were quick to slam the “ambush” on ITV‘s flagship breakfast show” – The Sun

  • Martin Lewis apologises for ambushing Kemi Badenoch live on air – Daily Telegraph
  • Finance hero in debt to Badenoch after gatecrashing her interview – The Times

Editorial

  • The student loans debt young people face is unjust and unsustainable – Daily Telegraph

Philipson unveils SEND policy and ‘four tier’ reforms for supporting kids as critics say the sums don’t add up

“All SEND pupils will be able to get support in school even if they have not been officially classed as requiring extra help, the Government will promise as it unveils a long-awaited shake-up of the system. Reform of the special educational needs and disabilities (SEND) regime in England is designed to end the status quo where an increasing number of children have been given a legal right to extra support beyond the help available in mainstream schools. It will cut the number of costly education, health and care plans (EHCPs) by requiring pupils on a plan to be reassessed when they move from primary to secondary school, and create a four-tier system with differing levels of intervention.” – The i

  • Schools white paper: the key Send policies, winners and losers – The Times
  • More than £430million spent by just ten councils to transport SEND children to schools last year – how much has your local authority spent? – Daily Mail
  • SEND promise.  More than a million kids with SEND to get more help under sweeping school reforms – The Sun

Comment

  • Labour’s Send proposals offer little reassurance for families – Jessie Hewitson, The Times
  • Labour’s Send revolution is a high-stakes experiment. It also threatens precious parental rights – John Harris, Guardian
  • Labour’s special educational needs reforms don’t add up – Joanna Williams, Spectator

UK unemployment to ‘rise above pandemic high within months’

“Unemployment will surge to 5.5pc within months as the jobless rate climbs above the worst months of the pandemic, a Wall Street bank has warned. Economists at JP Morgan said unemployment will hit two million in the first half of the year as businesses hold off hiring in the wake of Rachel Reeves’s £25bn raid on employers’ National Insurance contributions (NICs), which kicked in last April. The 5.5pc prediction compares to a peak of 5.3pc – equating to 1.8 million people – in December 2020. “Over a year has passed since the tax hike and the jobs market is still stagnating,” said Allan Monks, the chief UK economist at JP Morgan. The bank said the advance of artificial intelligence is also suppressing hiring. “Sectors which may be more exposed to AI adoption (eg business services and finance) continue to look relatively weak,” Mr Monks said. He expects employers to regain their confidence and start taking on staff once more later this year.” – Daily Telegraph

News in brief

  • ‘I will never forgive myself for losing top-secret documents on a train’ – Larisa Brown, The Times
  • How WM Police became a tool of the anti-Jewish mob – Brendan O’Neil, Spectator
  • The amnesiocracy governing Britain – Mary Harrington, Unherd
  • Who will save Britain’s lost generation? – Lawrence Newport, CapX

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Trump, USA Men’s Hockey Face Backlash Over Comment On Women’s Team

Published

on

Members of Team USA women's ice hockey celebrate Megan Keller's game-winning overtime goal against Canada at Milano Santagiulia Ice Hockey Arena on Thursday.

President Donald Trump is facing criticism after he joked with the Olympic podium-topping US men’s ice hockey team about having to invite the gold medal-winning American women’s squad to the White House as well.

In a congratulatory phone call with the US men, who took gold at the Winter Olympics for the first time in 46 years, Trump suggested using military aircraft to fly the team out to his State of the Union address on Tuesday before sharing a “very cool” pitch for the team to visit the White House the following day.

“And we have to — I must tell you — we’re going to have to bring the women’s team,” said Trump, who went on to chuckle as the American men burst into laughter in a clip circulating on social media.

He added, “[If I don’t] do that, I do believe I probably would be impeached, OK?”

Advertisement

The clip shows FBI Director Kash Patel, who is facing backlash of his own for guzzling beers with the US men on a reportedly taxpayer-funded trip to Italy, holding the phone as Trump speaks to the team and telling the president in a slurred voice that he can arrange such a visit.

Both the US men and women went undefeated in group stage play at the Winter Olympics and made it through the playoffs before securing gold by defeating the rival Canadians in overtime, by the same score (2-1).

The win for the American women marked their third gold since the Olympic sport’s introduction back in 1998.

A spokesperson for Team USA told NBC News that the White House invited the women’s team to the State Of The Union address and, while they are “sincerely grateful” for the invitation, the players are unable to attend “due to the timing and previously scheduled academic and professional commitments.”

Advertisement

It remains unclear whether members of the men’s squad will make it out to the SOTU address on Tuesday, and if members of either team have committed to visiting the White House the next day or in the future.

HuffPost has reached out to the White House and USA Hockey for comment.

Members of Team USA women's ice hockey celebrate Megan Keller's game-winning overtime goal against Canada at Milano Santagiulia Ice Hockey Arena on Thursday.
Members of Team USA women’s ice hockey celebrate Megan Keller’s game-winning overtime goal against Canada at Milano Santagiulia Ice Hockey Arena on Thursday.

EyesWideOpen via Getty Images

Social media users slammed Trump over his joke, including activist Shannon Watts, who denounced the president on X for “begrudgingly” extending the invite to the gold medal-winning women. She slammed the men’s team for laughing along.

Critics on X called the men in the video “spineless” and characterised the clip as “dispiriting” and “inexcusable.”

Advertisement

One top comment on Reddit described the joke as “absolutely shameful.”

“I wish I was surprised… but god it still turns my stomach knowing I was cheering for them just yesterday,” the commenter wrote of the men’s team.

The U.S. men's ice hockey team poses for a photo after defeating Canada for a gold medal at the Winter Olympics in Milan on Sunday.
The U.S. men’s ice hockey team poses for a photo after defeating Canada for a gold medal at the Winter Olympics in Milan on Sunday.

Petr David Josek via Associated Press

Others in the Reddit thread expressed their disappointment with brothers Quinn and Jack Hughes, the latter of whom scored the golden goal for the US men on Sunday, for appearing to laugh at the joke.

The siblings’ mother, Ellen Weinberg-Hughes, played for the US women’s team in the early ’90s and worked as a player development consultant for the squad in Milan.

Advertisement

Trump’s proposed date for Team USA’s White House visit — Wednesday — notably conflicts with the date that the National Hockey League season is set to resume play following an extended break due to the Winter Olympics.

Professional Women’s Hockey League players are also set to return to the ice on Thursday.

House Speaker Mike Johnson told reporters on Monday he was looking into the logistics of a potential DC visit by the teams.

NHL deputy commissioner Bill Daly told The Athletic that it’s up to the men’s players to decide whether they’d accept such invitations on an individual basis and, thereafter, their teams would have to sign off on such a visit.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Tourette’s Campaigner Addresses Baftas N-Word Tic Incident

Published

on

Michael B Jordan and Delroy Lindo on stage at the 2026 Baftas

Tourette’s campaigner John Davidson has issued a statement in response to the media furore surrounding an incident at this year’s Baftas.

On Sunday evening, John attended the awards show alongside the cast and crew of I Swear, a film based on his life story.

Variety reported that before the ceremony got underway, the event’s floor manager told guests that they “might hear some involuntary noises or movements during the ceremony”.

During the first award of the night, presented by Sinners actors Delroy Lindo and Michael B Jordan, John experienced an involuntary tic and shouted the N-word from the audience.

Advertisement

Following the incident – which the BBC included in its coverage of the Baftas, despite it airing on a two-hour time delay – John spoke out in a statement shared by Deadline on Monday night.

He began: “I wanted to thank Bafta and everyone involved in the awards last night for their support and understanding and inviting me to attend the broadcast.

“I appreciated the announcement to the auditorium in advance of the recording, warning everyone that my tics are involuntary and are not a reflection of my personal beliefs. I was heartened by the round of applause that followed this announcement and felt welcomed and understood in an environment that would normally be impossible for me.”

John continued: “In addition to the announcement by Alan Cumming, the BBC and Bafta, I can only add that I am, and always have been, deeply mortified if anyone considers my involuntary tics to be intentional or to carry any meaning.

Advertisement

“I was in attendance to celebrate the film of my life, I Swear, which, more than any film or TV documentary, explains the origins, condition, traits and manifestations of Tourette Syndrome. I have spent my life trying to support and empower the Tourette’s community and to teach empathy, kindness and understanding from others and I will continue to do so.”

He added: “I chose to leave the auditorium early into the ceremony as I was aware of the distress my tics were causing.”

Michael B Jordan and Delroy Lindo on stage at the 2026 Baftas
Michael B Jordan and Delroy Lindo on stage at the 2026 Baftas

Stuart Wilson via Getty Images for BAFTA

After Delroy Lindo expressed his disappointment at Bafta’s handling of the incident, the organisation issued a public apology to the Sinners actor and his co-star Michael B Jordan, accepting “full responsibility”.

In a statement to HuffPost UK, Bafta said: “At the Bafta Film Awards last night our guests heard very offensive language that carries incomparable trauma and pain for so many. We want to acknowledge the harm this has caused, address what happened and apologise to all.

Advertisement

“One of our guests, John Davidson MBE, has Tourette Syndrome and has devoted his life to educating and campaigning for better understanding of this condition. Tourette Syndrome causes involuntary verbal tics, that the individual has no control over.

“Such tics are in no way a reflection of an individual’s beliefs and are not intentional. John Davidson is an executive producer of the Bafta-nominated film, I Swear, which is based on his life experience.”

“We take the duty of care to all our guests very seriously and start from a position of inclusion,” the statement continued. “We took measures to make those in attendance aware of the tics, announcing to the audience before the ceremony began, and throughout, that John was in the room and that they may hear strong language, involuntary noises or movements during the ceremony.

“Early in the ceremony a loud tic in the form of a profoundly offensive term was heard by many people in the room. Michael B Jordan and Delroy Lindo were on stage at the time, and we apologise unreservedly to them, and to all those impacted. We would like to thank Michael and Delroy for their incredible dignity and professionalism.

Advertisement

“During the ceremony, John chose to leave the auditorium and watch the rest of the ceremony from a screen, and we would like to thank him for his dignity and consideration of others, on what should have been a night of celebration for him.

“We take full responsibility for putting our guests in a very difficult situation and we apologise to all. We will learn from this, and keep inclusion at the core of all we do, maintaining our belief in film and storytelling as a critical conduit for compassion and empathy.”

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Harmful Parenting Phrases To Avoid When Disciplining Kids

Published

on

Telling kids to "stop crying" or saying "they have nothing to cry about" can make them believe that their emotions aren't valid.

As your child is screaming, throwing toys or refusing to listen, it can be easy to say something you don’t really mean when reminding them how they should be acting.

Disciplining kids is tough, especially if you’re also feeling frustrated or mad in the moment. But many of the ways today’s parents were disciplined as children are actually problematic – and experts warn that those approaches shouldn’t trickle down to the next generation.

“Parents discipline the way they were disciplined, even if we don’t realise it,” said Leda Kaveh, a licensed clinical psychologist and owner and director of Washington Psychological Wellness and Washington Insight Solution.

“Parenting behaviours are strongly influenced by early attachment experiences,” Kaveh continued, adding that cultural norms around obedience, as well as chronic stress and financial pressure, play a role.

Advertisement

If you have memories of a parent disciplining you in a way that didn’t feel affirming, there’s a chance you’re doing that to your child, too. (That is, if you haven’t worked through it in therapy or another way.)

Below, therapists share the phrases you really shouldn’t say to kids when disciplining them, and how they can be quite harmful.

“Why can’t you be more like your brother?”

Statements like “Why can’t you be more like your brother” – or sister, neighbour, cousin or whoever – are harmful for kids to hear.

Advertisement

It’s “basically a character attack,” said Nicola Pierre-Smith, a licensed professional counsellor and owner of Melanated Women’s Health in Philadelphia.

There’s also a comparison that’s being made, she noted, which can make the child feel like they’re not enough.

“You’re acting just like your father.”

Similarly, it may be common for some parents to say things like “you’re acting just like your father” or “just like your mother,” particularly if the parents are divorced or in an unhappy marriage.

Advertisement

Generally, this kind of phrase is used when focusing on negative attributes of a parent or when the identified parent figure is a “villain” within the family, according to Pierre-Smith.

Perhaps your mum is known for acting selfishly. If your dad spits out “You’re acting like your mother” after you act up, you’ll likely associate it with your mum’s “bad” behaviour.

This, too, is a character attack, Pierre-Smith explained. “It’s typically not said when there is a positive attribute to the identified person. It is really meant to be a character attack to the child.”

Telling kids to "stop crying" or saying "they have nothing to cry about" can make them believe that their emotions aren't valid.

lechatnoir via Getty Images

Telling kids to “stop crying” or saying “they have nothing to cry about” can make them believe that their emotions aren’t valid.

“You’re such a disappointment.”

Advertisement

For a child who gets in trouble at school and comes home to a parent saying things like, “you’re a disappointment” or “you’re stupid,” it can be really damaging.

These kinds of phrases are meant to shame a child, Pierre-Smith said. This is true whether a parent intends to do this or not.

Research shows that children who experience frequent shame are at higher risk of anxiety and depression, and may grow up with self-worth problems.

“You have nothing to cry about.”

Advertisement

It’s pretty common for parents to shut down any tears or sensitivity during a tense moment. However, doing this is “teaching the child that certain emotions aren’t valid,” Pierre-Smith said.

Rejecting crying may also lead to children being unable to name their emotions, she added.

Kids who repeatedly hear phrases like this aren’t given the opportunity to develop language around emotions or understand what they’re feeling. “They just categorise them into ‘I’m feeling good’ or ‘I’m feeling bad,’ but not having the language to describe that.”

If you slip up and say one of these phrases here and there, it’s OK – but repeating them can be harmful.

Advertisement

Most parents have experienced getting swept up in the moment and saying something to their child that they regret. It’s not the one-off outburst that is inflicting harm. Instead, if you repeatedly discipline your child this way, it can be damaging, Kaveh said.

“When a child hears language that dismisses feelings or labels their behaviours as a personal flaw, the brain often shifts it into a stress response,” Kaveh explained.

“Over time, repeated experiences like this are associated with higher stress hormones such as cortisol, increased anxiety and emotional suppression, lower self-esteem and difficulty identifying and managing emotions later in life … It is a pattern over time that matters.”

If you do find yourself saying these phrases again and again, it’s worth thinking about how you were disciplined as a kid and what you may need to do to work through some of those experiences. Your own upbringing might be informing the way you parent, and it can take work to change, but it is possible.

Advertisement

“The encouraging news is that research shows parenting styles are highly adaptable. Increased awareness, education, therapy, moments of repair can significantly improve the parent-child relationships at any stage,” Kaveh said.

If you find it difficult to manage your emotions when you’re frustrated with your kids, there is “no shame in a parent actually reaching out to a professional or even someone in their school to get support with learning skills,” added Pierre-Smith.

Parents can be firm in their disciplining but should also be emotionally supportive.

“If you look at the research in developmental psychology, it shows that the most effective discipline is both firm and emotionally supportive,” Kaveh said.

Advertisement

“This approach is often also referred to as authoritative parenting, and is consistently associated with better emotional regulation, academic outcomes and mental health,” she noted.

According to Kaveh, effective discipline focuses on teaching, not punishment.

“This includes separating the child from the behaviour, acknowledging emotions while still setting limits and staying calm enough to model regulation,” Kaveh added.

Instead of saying “Stop crying,” you could say something like, “I see you’re really upset. I’m here. We still can’t throw toys, but we can figure out what you need,” she said.

Advertisement

This allows children to feel emotionally understood and receptive to guidance, Kaveh said.

“Feeling safe does not make kids less accountable. It actually makes learning possible,” she said.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Robert Carradine, Lizzie McGuire And Revenge Of The Nerds Star, Dies Aged 71

Published

on

Robert Carradine pictured in 2016

Robert Carradine, known to a generation of viewers as Lizzie McGuire’s father in the hit Disney sitcom, has died at the age of 71.

On Monday evening, Robert’s family announced that he had taken his own life, following what they described as a “nearly two-decade battle with bipolar disorder”.

The family said in a statement to Deadline: “It is with profound sadness that we must share that our beloved father, grandfather, uncle and brother Robert Carradine has passed away.

“In a world that can feel so dark, Bobby was always a beacon on light to everyone around him. We are bereft at the loss of this beautiful soul and want to acknowledge Bobby’s valiant struggle against his nearly two-decade battle with bipolar disorder.

Advertisement

“We hope his journey can shine a light and encourage addressing the stigma that attaches to mental illness. At this time we ask for the privacy to grieve this unfathomable loss. With gratitude for your understanding and compassion.”

Robert Carradine pictured in 2016
Robert Carradine pictured in 2016

Robert’s brother Keith added: “We want people to know it, and there is no shame in it. It is an illness that got the best of him, and I want to celebrate him for his struggle with it, and celebrate his beautiful soul.

“He was profoundly gifted, and we will miss him every day. We will take solace in how funny he could be, how wise and utterly accepting and tolerant he was. That’s who my baby brother was.”

Born into the Carradine acting dynasty, Robert got his start in the industry in TV shows like Bonanza and Kung Fu, as well as the films The Cowboys and Mean Streets.

In the mid-1980s, he appeared as Lewis Skolnick in Revenge Of The Nerds, reprising the role in three sequels in the following decade, and later fronting the TV spin-off King Of The Nerds.

Advertisement
Robert Carradine in character on the set of Revenge Of The Nerds
Robert Carradine in character on the set of Revenge Of The Nerds

To Lizzie McGuire fans, though, he’ll be best remembered for his work as Hilary Duff’s on-screen dad Sam McGuire in both seasons of the teen sitcom and its movie adaptation.

Last year, he appeared alongside Brian Austin Green and Danny Trejo in the Western thriller The Night They Came Home, having completed work on three more movies prior to his death.

Per Deadline, Robert is survived by “his children, grandchildren, brothers, nieces, nephews and anyone who had the honour of having him in their life”.

Help and support:

  • Mind, open Monday to Friday, 9am-6pm on 0300 123 3393.
  • Samaritans offers a listening service which is open 24 hours a day, on 116 123 (UK and ROI – this number is FREE to call and will not appear on your phone bill).
  • CALM (the Campaign Against Living Miserably) offer a helpline open 5pm-midnight, 365 days a year, on 0800 58 58 58, and a webchat service.
  • The Mix is a free support service for people under 25. Call 0808 808 4994 or email help@themix.org.uk
  • Rethink Mental Illness offers practical help through its advice line which can be reached on 0808 801 0525 (Monday to Friday 10am-4pm). More info can be found on rethink.org.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Delroy Lindo Calls Out How Bafta Handled N-Word Tic Incident

Published

on

Michael B. Jordan and Delroy Lindo presenting the Special Visual Effects Award at Sunday night's Baftas

Sinners actor Delroy Lindo has admitted he’s disappointed with the way Bafta reacted to an incident he found himself at the centre of during this year’s ceremony.

On Sunday night, Delroy and Michael B Jordan – who had both been nominated for Baftas off the back of their performances in Sinners – presented the first award of the ceremony, for Best Visual Effects.

During their introductory speech, Tourette’s campaigner John Davidson experienced an involuntary tic and shouted the N-word from the auditorium.

John had been attending the Baftas with the cast and crew of I Swear, a film based on his life story.

Advertisement

After the slur was shouted, the two briefly paused before continuing to present, with host Alan Cumming first thanking the audience for their “understanding” and later apologising to anyone “if you are offended tonight”.

Speaking to Vanity Fair after the event, Delroy said that he and Michael “did what we had to do” by carrying on with the night’s proceedings.

However, he said he wished “someone from Bafta spoke to us afterwards”.

Michael B Jordan and Delroy Lindo presenting on stage at Sunday night's Baftas
Michael B Jordan and Delroy Lindo presenting on stage at Sunday night’s Baftas

Tristan Fewings via Getty Images for BAFTA

On Monday night, Bafta issued an apology to Delroy and Michael in a lengthy statement, taking “full responsibility” for the incident.

Advertisement

“At the Bafta Film Awards last night our guests heard very offensive language that carries incomparable trauma and pain for so many,” Bafta told HuffPost UK. “We want to acknowledge the harm this has caused, address what happened and apologise to all.

“One of our guests, John Davidson MBE, has Tourette Syndrome and has devoted his life to educating and campaigning for better understanding of this condition. Tourette Syndrome causes involuntary verbal tics, that the individual has no control over.

“Such tics are in no way a reflection of an individual’s beliefs and are not intentional. John Davidson is an executive producer of the Bafta-nominated film, I Swear, which is based on his life experience.”

John Davidson at the 2026 Baftas
John Davidson at the 2026 Baftas

Anthony Harvey/Shutterstock

The statement continued: “We take the duty of care to all our guests very seriously and start from a position of inclusion. We took measures to make those in attendance aware of the tics, announcing to the audience before the ceremony began, and throughout, that John was in the room and that they may hear strong language, involuntary noises or movements during the ceremony.

Advertisement

“Early in the ceremony a loud tic in the form of a profoundly offensive term was heard by many people in the room. Michael B Jordan and Delroy Lindo were on stage at the time, and we apologise unreservedly to them, and to all those impacted. We would like to thank Michael and Delroy for their incredible dignity and professionalism.

“During the ceremony, John chose to leave the auditorium and watch the rest of the ceremony from a screen, and we would like to thank him for his dignity and consideration of others, on what should have been a night of celebration for him.

“We take full responsibility for putting our guests in a very difficult situation and we apologise to all. We will learn from this, and keep inclusion at the core of all we do, maintaining our belief in film and storytelling as a critical conduit for compassion and empathy.”

John also spoke out for the first time on Monday, stating: “I am, and always have been, deeply mortified if anyone considers my involuntary tics to be intentional or to carry any meaning.”

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Falls With Toothbrushes Can Cause Stroke In Toddlers, Says Neurologist

Published

on

Falls With Toothbrushes Can Cause Stroke In Toddlers, Says Neurologist

This article features medical advice from neurologist Baibing Chen.

Anyone who has the pleasure of living with a toddler will know they often like to dart swiftly in the opposite direction, usually with something they shouldn’t have in their mouth.

This isn’t ideal at the best of times, but when said object is a toothbrush, pencil, hard straw or utensil, parents should be moving ultra fast to stop them.

In a video shared on Instagram, neurologist Baibing Chen – who goes by Dr Bing on social media – said if a child falls with an object in their mouth, it doesn’t just hurt. Alarmingly, it could also trigger something as sinister as stroke – even if there’s no bleeding involved.

Advertisement

Dr Bing described how he once saw a young child who had been running around at home with a toothbrush in his mouth. (We all know where this is going…)

Unfortunately the little one fell down and the toothbrush hit the back of his throat. His mum checked the inside of his mouth and couldn’t see any bleeding or obvious injury, so they went about their day as usual.

But later on, Dr Bing revealed the boy suddenly couldn’t move the right side of his body, and he also started having trouble speaking.

Why can this happen?

Advertisement

While the toothbrush didn’t cut through anything, Dr Bing said the impact from the fall injured the carotid artery in the boy’s neck – “and when that artery gets damaged, and in this case a dissection happened, a clot can form, and that clot can then travel to the brain, [and] block blood flow, causing stroke”.

The neurologist emphasised that the back of the throat sits very close to major blood vessels that supply the brain “and trauma in the area is not always traumatic or bloody, and sometimes the outside looks normal, but the inside is a completely different story”.

In severe cases, the force of the toothbrush hitting the throat (and the artery) can cause a life-threatening haemorrhage.

A review of toothbrush-related injuries in the US found most occurred in children younger than four years old.

Advertisement

Dr Bing urged parents to teach children to not run around with sharp or blunt objects in their mouths. And if they do happen to do it anyway (because kids will be kids), swift intervention is key.

“It’s a simple habit that can prevent a life-changing brain injury,” he ended.

I, for one, will be taking his advice on board.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Reform UK Accused Of Declaring War On Workers

Published

on

Reform UK Accused Of Declaring War On Workers

Reform UK have been accused of “declaring war on British workers” over plans to scrap new employment rights if they win the next general election.

Deputy leader Richard Tice will unveil the policy in a major speech on Tuesday setting out the party’s right-wing approach to growing the economy and tackling the cost of living.

Tice, who is Reform’s business, trade and energy spokesman, will promise to bring in a Great Repeal Bill to scrap new employment rights rules introduced by Labour.

It would also get rid of the government’s pledge to achieve Net Zero by 2050 and improved rights for renters.

Advertisement

Tice will say those policies are “all well intentioned but kill jobs, hinder growth, investment and prosperity”.

“This will all help lower inflation and bring down bills for consumers,” he will say.

But Labour chair Anna Turley said: “Reform have formally declared war on British workers. Nigel Farage and his cronies want to rip up hard-won workers’ rights on parental leave, sick pay, and would cut up to a million clean energy jobs in the process.

“Reform have revealed whose side they’re on – and it’s not working people. And it’s families up and down the country who’d be left paying a very heavy price.

Advertisement

“While Reform shout from the sidelines, this Labour government is delivering the biggest uplift in workers’ rights in a generation, reducing the cost of energy bills for working families and delivering the stability businesses need to unlock economic growth across the UK.”

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

What’s behind Badenoch’s youth revival?

Published

on

What’s behind Badenoch’s youth revival?

It was at 25-years-old that Kemi Badenoch joined the Conservative Party – for the partying. “Socialising, drinks, hanging out with other young people,” she recalls, and it was how she eventually met her husband, Hamish, at the Dulwich and West Norwood Conservative Club.

Two decades on, she is drafting policy for that same cohort and attempting to make the party’s youth wing – the Young Conservatives – fun again. The sort of thing a 25-year-old Kemi might actually have turned up to.

Over the weekend the party unveiled its New Deal for Young people, with Badenoch vowing to cut student loan interest and boost apprenticeships. The thinking, one Tory source insists, is not “cynical politics” but to “do what is right for the country”.

“Yes, young people are not our traditional voters but we have got to move away from thinking about whether this hits the core voter demographic with policy and instead focus on whether it deals with systemic issues.”

Advertisement

It builds on the back of other policies like scrapping stamp duty – and, I’m told, “you can expect more… our direction of travel speaks for itself”, with this referred to as only Step 1.

“We knew we were dealing with a tricky one given when Plan 2 came in but it demonstrates we  are not going to shy away from dealing with issues people are facing just because it happened under the old Tory Party. We are going to right some wrongs.”

Policy chief Neil O’Brien, who has had a big hand in the new approach, made as much clear when pressed by Sophy Ridge on Sky. Asked whether the original policy had been a mistake, he said yes – and that he would apologise to students burdened with loan debts.

A member of CCHQ source frames it more broadly: “It comes down to what the core values are that we hold true: aspiration, being a contributing member of society, having barriers to growth and opportunity removed – anything we see that get in the way of that, we’re going to go after.”

Advertisement

A forthcoming report from Next Gen Tories leans heavily on the same themes: aspiration, wealth creation – particularly housing and infrastructure – and community. The argument is that the party must offer more than a narrow economic pitch; it must articulate a case for civic life too.

Next Gen Tories’ James Cowling, tells me: “We’re massively heading in the right direction. Kemi’s recognised that we need to restore the link between hard work and rewards. The next big step is a serious plan for housing and infrastructure, which will make us the only serious party in UK politics.”

There has been increased engagement from CCHQ with the group around policy announcements like cutting student loan interest, and a sense that the party has understood the intellectual arguments for change.

As another Tory source tells me, there is a political incentive as “more in detail polling shows that high earners in their 30s and 40s are low hanging fruit” for the party to go after.

Advertisement

It is alongside this policy push that an effort has been made to reenergise the Young Conservatives, the party’s official youth section – 120 years since the party’s first youth wing was launched. One CCHQ staffer admits the organisation had “rather been abandoned”. When Fred Lynam – who works between CCHQ and Badenoch’s parliamentary office, and has been spearheading the latest efforts – checked the website earlier last year, it still featured photographs of former leader Rishi Sunak.

There are now signs of life: a newly formed national management executive held its first meeting earlier this month. Some branches – in Camden and Barnet, at UEA and in Norfolk – were already active, but there was little structure. Badenoch has made a point of engaging, attending London drinks and a pub event at conference. I’m told she “wants it to be fun”.

The age cap has been lifted from 25 to 30 to widen the pool. More resources and professional support are being channelled in from HQ. There is talk of changing the image to show that the YCs are populated by “normal people”.

A new committee has been formed, with Kevin Ghateh elected as the interim-chair. He tells me that “if it’s an environment full of young people, we want it to be that way – not pretend to be anything else,” hence throwing parties like their one at Christmas with DJs and karaoke, and an event this weekend where they have booked out a nightclub in Birmingham til 2am.

Advertisement

Hugo Rasenberg, the group’s comms and social media member, adds: “We want a cultural change within the organisation to make it open and accessible, not people turning up in a three-piece suit.”

He sees a chance to “seize the obvious gap in the market” politically. “Young people are more aspirational than ever,” Rasenberg says, “it has taken until the past 12 months for the party to wake up to that”.

Ghateh thinks there has been a “key difference in before and after” Badenoch took the reigns “when it comes to engagement with the YCs”.

“It’s definitely a good start. It has been quite rare for the party to actually be developing policy for young people. I just hope there’s more.”

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Festus Akinbusoye: Why London’s Low Traffic Neighbourhoods are failing the working class

Published

on

Festus Akinbusoye: Why London's Low Traffic Neighbourhoods are failing the working class

Festus Akinbusoye was the Conservative Bedfordshire Police and Crime Commissioner from 2021 to 2024.

The architectural serenity of Westminster offers a rare vantage point from which to observe the escalating friction defining modern London. While this borough where I live has maintained a commitment to fluid movement, our neighbours have succumbed to an orthodoxy that treats the city as a static laboratory rather than a vibrant economy.

The proliferation of Low Traffic Neighbourhoods (LTNs) – especially in our poorest boroughs, has evolved from a well-intentioned environmental trial, into a religion of automated enforcement that disproportionately penalises those who can least afford the price of admission to our roads.

The human cost of this experiment is most visible in the levels of unpaid fines. Recent data published in the Telegraph reveals a deepening crisis of legitimacy in the capital, with barely 60 per cent of the Penalty Charge Notices (PCNs) issued for LTN infractions over the last five years being settled by motorists. This widespread non-compliance suggests that we are not witnessing a wave of casual lawbreaking, but rather a profound grassroots rejection and anger toward a policy that feels predatory rather than protective. For a delivery driver in a place like Newham where I grew up, or a tradesman in Tower Hamlets where I went to school – boroughs consistently ranked within the most deprived 10 per cent of local authorities in England; a single camera-generated fine could represent a significant portion of their daily take-home pay.

Advertisement

There is however an uncomfortable paradox at the heart of the “quiet streets” movement: the displacement of congestion from affluent residential enclaves onto the arterial boundary roads where the working poor reside and take buses.

Rosamund Kissi-Debrah, whose advocacy following the tragic death of her daughter Ella, has become a cornerstone of the clean air debate. She has rightly raised concerns, and warned that current LTN strategies risk becoming a whitewash if they merely move the problem around the corner, which they do. When traffic is funnelled onto main roads, it is the residents of social housing blocks and the commuters waiting at bus stops who inhale the concentrated fumes of idling vehicles.

The economic paralysis resulting from these barriers is quantifiable. The Tom Tom Traffic Index has consistently crowned London the slowest capital city in the world, with drivers losing up to 141 hours to congestion annually. It now takes an average of 3 minutes and 38 seconds to travel just 1km (0.6 miles) in central London. The worst period in 2025 was during the train strikes.

There is data also directly linking the slowdown in traffic in London to increasing installation of LTNs. It is however surprising to note efforts made by the Mayor’s office to suppress evidence which showed that LTNs did not reduce car use as was initially promised. I wonder why. Cars do not simply vanish from existence because of flower boxes installed on roads.

Advertisement

These disruptive schemes have devastating effects on the public transport network that the Mayor claims to champion. Data highlighted by the London Assembly Conservative Group shows that bus speeds have plummeted in areas where LTNs have been implemented without adequate mitigation; turning a simple cross-town journey into a gruelling endurance test for those with the patience of a biblical Job.

There is also a direct cost to the public purse for this. As bus journeys take longer due to congestion, passenger numbers are falling too. Why take a bus when you can get to your destination faster through other modes of travel? The Mayor is now subsiding London’s buses to the tune of £1.2 billion a year.

This is more than a transportation and ideological issue, it is also an assault on the social mobility of the capital. The “laptop class” may enjoy the newfound silence of their ‘walled’ cul-de-sacs, but the electrician navigating a labyrinth of bollards to reach a job site, or the night-shift nurse whose commute has doubled in distance is paying a hidden tax on their time and productivity.

Small businesses, already reeling from inflationary pressures, find their supply chains strangled and their customer footfall eroded by a design that treats the economy as an afterthought. Rather than pursuing a policy of managed immobility, we should be investing in the technological and natural solutions that provide clean air without social exclusion.

Advertisement

We must pivot from restrictive, punitive measures that disproportionately squeeze lower-income households toward a strategy built on common-sense and innovation. Instead of “barricaded zones” and daily fines, a truly progressive vision prioritises the rapid expansion of green canopies to act as natural carbon sinks and the roll-out of AI-driven traffic management to dissolve congestion without blocking trade. Investment in infrastructure for electric commercial fleets and making public transport much more reliable, safe, and efficient should be key areas of focus – not more LTNs.

The burgeoning rebellion on our streets from Hackney to Lambeth; Tower Hamlets to Ealing, and the mounting legal challenges against these schemes should serve as a warning to policymakers. People are fed up with all these punishing restrictions and punitive measures.

Enough is enough.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025