Connect with us

Politics

Tourette’s Campaigner Addresses Baftas N-Word Tic Incident

Published

on

Michael B Jordan and Delroy Lindo on stage at the 2026 Baftas

Tourette’s campaigner John Davidson has issued a statement in response to the media furore surrounding an incident at this year’s Baftas.

On Sunday evening, John attended the awards show alongside the cast and crew of I Swear, a film based on his life story.

Variety reported that before the ceremony got underway, the event’s floor manager told guests that they “might hear some involuntary noises or movements during the ceremony”.

During the first award of the night, presented by Sinners actors Delroy Lindo and Michael B Jordan, John experienced an involuntary tic and shouted the N-word from the audience.

Advertisement

Following the incident – which the BBC included in its coverage of the Baftas, despite it airing on a two-hour time delay – John spoke out in a statement shared by Deadline on Monday night.

He began: “I wanted to thank Bafta and everyone involved in the awards last night for their support and understanding and inviting me to attend the broadcast.

“I appreciated the announcement to the auditorium in advance of the recording, warning everyone that my tics are involuntary and are not a reflection of my personal beliefs. I was heartened by the round of applause that followed this announcement and felt welcomed and understood in an environment that would normally be impossible for me.”

John continued: “In addition to the announcement by Alan Cumming, the BBC and Bafta, I can only add that I am, and always have been, deeply mortified if anyone considers my involuntary tics to be intentional or to carry any meaning.

Advertisement

“I was in attendance to celebrate the film of my life, I Swear, which, more than any film or TV documentary, explains the origins, condition, traits and manifestations of Tourette Syndrome. I have spent my life trying to support and empower the Tourette’s community and to teach empathy, kindness and understanding from others and I will continue to do so.”

He added: “I chose to leave the auditorium early into the ceremony as I was aware of the distress my tics were causing.”

Michael B Jordan and Delroy Lindo on stage at the 2026 Baftas
Michael B Jordan and Delroy Lindo on stage at the 2026 Baftas

Stuart Wilson via Getty Images for BAFTA

After Delroy Lindo expressed his disappointment at Bafta’s handling of the incident, the organisation issued a public apology to the Sinners actor and his co-star Michael B Jordan, accepting “full responsibility”.

In a statement to HuffPost UK, Bafta said: “At the Bafta Film Awards last night our guests heard very offensive language that carries incomparable trauma and pain for so many. We want to acknowledge the harm this has caused, address what happened and apologise to all.

Advertisement

“One of our guests, John Davidson MBE, has Tourette Syndrome and has devoted his life to educating and campaigning for better understanding of this condition. Tourette Syndrome causes involuntary verbal tics, that the individual has no control over.

“Such tics are in no way a reflection of an individual’s beliefs and are not intentional. John Davidson is an executive producer of the Bafta-nominated film, I Swear, which is based on his life experience.”

“We take the duty of care to all our guests very seriously and start from a position of inclusion,” the statement continued. “We took measures to make those in attendance aware of the tics, announcing to the audience before the ceremony began, and throughout, that John was in the room and that they may hear strong language, involuntary noises or movements during the ceremony.

“Early in the ceremony a loud tic in the form of a profoundly offensive term was heard by many people in the room. Michael B Jordan and Delroy Lindo were on stage at the time, and we apologise unreservedly to them, and to all those impacted. We would like to thank Michael and Delroy for their incredible dignity and professionalism.

Advertisement

“During the ceremony, John chose to leave the auditorium and watch the rest of the ceremony from a screen, and we would like to thank him for his dignity and consideration of others, on what should have been a night of celebration for him.

“We take full responsibility for putting our guests in a very difficult situation and we apologise to all. We will learn from this, and keep inclusion at the core of all we do, maintaining our belief in film and storytelling as a critical conduit for compassion and empathy.”

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics

Hilary Duff Remembers Lizzie McGuire Co-Star Robert Carradine

Published

on

Hilary Duff Remembers Lizzie McGuire Co-Star Robert Carradine

In a statement issued on Monday night, Robert’s family confirmed that he had taken his own life, following what they described as a “nearly two-decade battle with bipolar disorder”.

Hilary Duff, who played Robert’s on-screen daughter in the Disney show between 2001 and 2004, shared a tribute to her former co-star shortly after the announcement.

“This one hurts,” Hilary wrote on Instagram. “It’s really hard to face this reality about an old friend. There was so much warmth in the McGuire family and I always felt so cared for by my on-screen parents. I’ll be forever grateful for that.

“I’m deeply sad to learn Bobby was suffering. My heart aches for him, his family, and everyone who loved him,” she added, alongside a broken-hearted emoji.

Advertisement

Meanwhile, Jake Thomas, who played Lizzie’s little brother Matt, wrote on his Instagram: “I was fortunate to know Bobby for most of my life. And he was one of the coolest guys you could ever meet. Funny, pragmatic, sometimes cranky, always a little eccentric. He was a talented actor, musician and director. But more than anything, he was family.

“I have many fond memories of being with him and his family throughout my life. Good moments, challenging moments and lots of laughs in between.”

He continued: “I looked up to him growing up. And later, I came to realise he thought I was pretty neat, too. So I guess I was doing something right.”

Alongside playing Sam McGuire, Robert appeared in the 1984 cult classic Revenge Of The Nerds, as well as Escape From LA, The Long Riders and Django Unchained.

Advertisement

His most recent on-screen credit was in the 2024 Western thriller The Night They Came Home, although the actor has three films currently in production, which are set to be released posthumously.

Per Deadline, Robert is survived by “his children, grandchildren, brothers, nieces, nephews and anyone who had the honour of having him in their life”.

Help and support:

  • Mind, open Monday to Friday, 9am-6pm on 0300 123 3393.
  • Samaritans offers a listening service which is open 24 hours a day, on 116 123 (UK and ROI – this number is FREE to call and will not appear on your phone bill).
  • CALM (the Campaign Against Living Miserably) offer a helpline open 5pm-midnight, 365 days a year, on 0800 58 58 58, and a webchat service.
  • The Mix is a free support service for people under 25. Call 0808 808 4994 or email help@themix.org.uk
  • Rethink Mental Illness offers practical help through its advice line which can be reached on 0808 801 0525 (Monday to Friday 10am-4pm). More info can be found on rethink.org.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Nick Robinson Slams Ed Davey Over Past Prince Andrew Praise

Published

on

Nick Robinson Slams Ed Davey Over Past Prince Andrew Praise

Nick Robinson skewered Ed Davey over his past praise for the “excellent job” the then Prince Andrew was doing as the UK’s trade envoy.

The Lib Dem leader was left embarrassed during an excruciating grilling on Radio 4′s Today programme.

Davey is forcing a vote in the House of Commons today which could force the government to publish all documents relating to Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor’s appointment and performance as trade envoy.

He said: “I think we’ve seen too often in the past that people, because of their title or their friends or whatever, have not been properly held to account.

Advertisement

“The rules of the House of Commons have prevented, and Speakers have overseen this over the centuries, prevented MPs from criticising members of the Royal Family and sometimes even mentioning them, and that really seems old fashioned and is the wrong thing to do.”

But Robinson told him: “It’s what you did when you were a minister though, isn’t it?”

Davey then admitted praising the job the then Prince Andrew did as UK trade envoy during a Commons debate in 2011, when he was business minister in the Tory-Lib Dem coalition government.

“I regret doing that,” he said.

Advertisement

Robinson said: “You said the Duke of York’s done ‘an excellent job’. You said he’s been ‘a longstanding success in the role’, you said he’s ‘a real asset for our country, supporting UK business’.

“And concerns being raised by a Labour backbencher, Paul Flynn, at the time, echoing the concerns of human rights groups about Prince Andrew, you dismissed as ‘innuendo’.”

The Lib Dem leader replied: “First of all, can I apologise to all those victims of Epstein who may have read those words and been upset by them. I really regret them.

“I was taking over a debate from another minister and wasn’t really over the brief.”

Advertisement

Robinson went on to remind Davey that he had criticised Flynn for bringing the debate, saying his “timing is particularly inappropriate as it comes four days after the Royal wedding [between William and Kate], when I believe the whole country showed the support that they give to the Royal Family”.

“It’s quite embarrassingly at odds with what you’re now saying, isn’t it,” Robinson asked him.

Davey said: “Yes. I didn’t know what we now know back then and it’s interesting to note that the prime minister at the time ensured that Prince Andrew stood down from the role two months later.

“So clearly someone in government did know there were huge problems with the way he was conducting his role.”

Advertisement

He added: “I’m pretty angry, to be honest, that I was put in that position.”

But Robinson then asked: “Shouldn’t you have learned that people in power should not merely read out words provided for them criticising others who raise questions, and not go back to their office and say ‘how do we know this is actually true’?”

The Lib Dem leader said: “I wish I hadn’t said those words, and I think we are all learning that the need to make sure that whatever position of power is held by an individual, they are accountable for that.”

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

PinkPantheress Makes Brit Awards History As First Female Producer Of The Year Winner

Published

on

PinkPantheress Makes Brit Awards History As First Female Producer Of The Year Winner

PinkPantheress has become the first woman in history to be awarded the Producer Of The Year title at the Brit Awards.

Ahead of this year’s ceremony, which is due to take place on Saturday night, PinkPantheress has been unveiled as the latest recipient of the prestigious title, previously awarded to the likes of Brian Eno, Paul Epworth, Calvin Harris and A.G. Cook.

In addition to being the first woman to be given the prize since it was first awarded in 1977, PinkPantheress is also its youngest ever recipient.

She told BBC News: “I guess it’s bittersweet that I’m the first one, the first woman, to get it.

Advertisement

“As young as I am, it feels almost a bit crazy. Like, I’m not really legendary enough to be receiving it – but you know, I will definitely take it!”

Last year, PinkPantheress received huge acclaim for her second mixtape Fancy That, which spawned the chart hits Illegal, Tonight and Stateside.

Following the success of the release, she’s also in the running for British Artist Of The Year and Best Dance Act at Saturday night’s ceremony, having also been nominated for two awards at the Grammys earlier this year.

The 2026 Brits will take place in Manchester for the first time, with Lola Young and Olivia Dean both leading the way with five nominations each, ahead of Sam Fender’s four nods.

Advertisement

Performers on the night will include Harry Styles; Album Of The Year nominees Wolf Alice; Rosalía; and Mark Ronson, who is being awarded the prestigious Outstanding Contribution award.

Meanwhile, Noel Gallagher has been awarded Songwriter Of The Year, a somewhat controversial decision given the Oasis musician didn’t actually release any new music in 2025.

The Brit Awards 2026, hosted by Jack Whitehall for the sixth time, will air live on ITV1 on Saturday 28 February from 8.15pm.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

The House Opinion Article | The Professor Will See You Now: Recycling

Published

on

The Professor Will See You Now: Recycling
The Professor Will See You Now: Recycling

Illustration by Tracy Worrall


4 min read

Lessons in political science. This week: recycling

Advertisement

You are unlikely to have heard of the Maresfield recycling centre, although you may have correctly surmised that it is a recycling centre based in Maresfield. Just down the road from me, it is to recycling centres what The Moon Under Water pub was for George Orwell. Helpful staff. Well-run. Easy to use. Takes almost anything. With – and this bit is key for what follows – rarely any queues. A bit busy at weekends, but even then, I’ve never waited for long.

So, imagine my surprise when the council launched a consultation about introducing a booking system, arguing that it would reduce waiting times.

I was even more surprised when the consultation questions arrived. They included this zinger: “Do you want less queuing at our sites?” The response options were yes or no. There was no question asking: is queuing a problem? It is now stored in the folder I use for teaching, full of examples of dodgy polling, dubious graphs and similar; the folder is entitled ‘Only The Lib Dems Can Win Here’.

Advertisement

The cynic in me had therefore begun to wonder whether the consultation was quite as genuine as it purported to be. But I did my civic duty and responded, as did almost 6,000 other people – a record for the council; of those responses, 91 per cent were negative.

Given the overwhelming weight of views against the proposal, the council did the only thing possible and nixed it.

I made that last bit up. What happened – and let’s face it, this doesn’t come as a surprise to you – is that the council pushed ahead regardless.

Advertisement

It seems invidious to name the council involved (although for the record it is East Sussex county council), because it’s not a one-off. I’ve taken part in three consultations like this, and in each case it was pretty obvious that the consultation was merely providing cover for what had already been decided.

Now, I know that consultations are not referenda; they aren’t just about weighing the responses. We don’t know whether respondents are representative of the wider population. And some views may – for perfectly good reason – carry more weight than others. There may well be valid justifications for this policy; the council claim it will save money. And, in the end, this is a political decision for which councillors are accountable at the ballot box. All true.

Still, I do wonder about the effect that these Potemkin consultations have on the public – and their sense of political trust and efficacy. 

This is normally the point in the article at which, like some second-rate psephological magician, I whip out from the hat a piece of research demonstrating either the obvious (this stuff damages public trust in politics) or – and the editor prefers this – the counter-intuitive: you might think , but guess what? Clever folk have shown not to be true! 

Advertisement

But this time, I can’t. This is partly a comment on how nationally focused so much research is; local government is too often the Untermensch of political science, despite its importance to voters. No one even seems to know how many of these damned things there are each year – yet Sussex alone seems to have had over 70 – let alone looked into their effect. Somebody should.

But I am reminded of a fascinating piece of work from a few years ago on the public petitions process in Scotland, which found that what the author called “process evaluations” were much more important than “outcome evaluations” on levels of political trust. Those who saw a process as fair and meaningful were far more likely to accept the outcome (even if they did not “win”) than those who saw it as unfair and meaningless (even if they did “win”). 

Folk didn’t mind not getting their way, as long as they felt they had been dealt with fairly. It’s not obvious to me that many local consultations clear that bar.

Further reading: C Carman, The Process is the Reality: Perceptions of Procedural Fairness and Participatory Democracy, Political Studies (2010)

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Robert De Niro Gets Emotional Urging Americans To Resist Trump

Published

on

Robert De Niro Gets Emotional Urging Americans To Resist Trump

Robert De Niro has made no secret about what he thinks of Donald Trump, but he got very emotional about the state of the US under the presidentduring an interview with MS NOW’s Nicolle Wallace on Monday.

“The story is our country, and Trump is destroying it, and who knows what his reasons are, but it’s sick, it’s fucked up,” De Niro said. “We have to save this country.”

Toward the end of the interview, De Niro seemed on the verge of tears when Wallace asked him why he makes a point of thanking the people who work for him at awards shows.

“You have to — you have to lift people up,” the actor said, with his voice starting to crack, before explaining, “You have to bring them together. You can’t divide people, you can’t win that way.”

Advertisement

Things got emotional as De Niro pivoted back to discussing Trump’s divisive presidency.

“It’s a no-win situation, and look what we have, look who we have there, it’s almost like a destiny to have this thing there, destroying… attempting to destroy this country and maybe not even understanding why. So it’s up to us to protect the country,” he said.

“You weren’t supposed to make me cry,” Wallace told De Niro before she noted that the US seems to be facing a moment where things could go “one way or the other” — a seeming reference to whether the country’s democratic traditions continue. She asked point-blank: “You think it’s going the other way?”

Advertisement

De Niro admitted he didn’t know for sure.

“All I know is people have to have to resist, resist, resist,” he said. “There’s no easy way. It’s not going to come to you easy. You know, there’s a time when you know in your own life and your own survival, you better do this. You better jump and run through the fire because if you don’t run through the fire, you’re not getting out, and that’s what we have to do.”

De Niro has been a big critic of Trump over the years, and explained why in an interview last May.

“The man is a bully, and you can’t let bullies win. If a bully comes for your lunch money on Monday, he’s going to ask for more on Tuesday. You have to stand up. And I wouldn’t want to look at myself if I didn’t,” he told The Guardian.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Newslinks for Tuesday 24th of February 2026

Published

on

Newslinks for Friday 30th January 2026

Mandelson released after arrest over suspicion of sharing information with Epstein

“Lord Mandelson has been released on bail after he was arrested for allegedly passing secret government information to the paedophile financier Jeffrey Epstein. He was pictured letting himself back into his London home in the early hours of Tuesday morning. A police statement said: “A 72-year-old man arrested on suspicion of misconduct in public office has been released on bail pending further investigation”. The former ambassador to the US was taken into custody by the Metropolitan Police on Monday afternoon as part of their criminal investigation into claims that he leaked market-sensitive government documents and insider information during his time as business secretary. He has been arrested on suspicion of misconduct in public office, an offence that carries a maximum sentence of life in prison. He has previously denied any wrongdoing and said that he did not act for financial gain. Sir Keir Starmer faces questions about his political judgment in appointing Mandelson as ambassador despite knowing about Mandelson’s links to Epstein. The prime minister has said that Mandelson misled him about the extent of their friendship. Mandelson was arrested only days before a by-election in Gorton & Denton, in Manchester, that is considered crucial for Labour.”  – The Times

  • Mandelson released from custody after being arrested – Daily Telegraph
  • Peter Mandelson arrested on suspicion of misconduct in public office – FT
  • Peter Mandelson arrested by Met Police – Spectator
  • Mandelson is released on bail after being quizzed by Scotland Yard’s elite ‘Celeb Squad’: Questions over what prompted ‘unusual’ 4.30pm arrest at disgraced Lord’s £7m home 17 days after his properties were searched over links to Epstein – Daily Mail
  • No special favours for Lord Mandelson in police custody – Daily Telegraph
  • Peter Mandelson arrested on suspicion of misconduct in public office – Guardian
  • Labour’s Peter Mandelson released on bail after sensational arrest – Daily Express
  • Mandy Released. Peter Mandelson released on bail and arrives home at 2am after being held by Met cops for 9 hours over Epstein files – The Sun
  • ‘Dear Gordon’ email was in Epstein’s inbox 38 minutes after reaching PM – Daily Telegraph
  • Mystery over Mandelson arrest 17 days after his homes were searched as ex-cop asks ‘what made Met change their mind?’ –  Sun

COMMENT

  • Mandelson’s downfall leaves New Labour in the dock – Ben Riley-Smith, Daily Telegraph
  • Mandelson’s downfall is one of fastest ever seen in British public life – Matthew Weaver, The Guardian
  • Why was Peter Mandelson arrested? Epstein files reveal key theories – Steven Swinford, Oliver Wright, The Times

Embattled Starmer goes to Gorton and Denton for last minute by-election push

“Sir Keir Starmer has staked his personal credibility on Labour winning a pivotal by-election by making his first visit to the constituency days before voters go to the polls. The prime minister warned that a Reform UK victory would cause the seat of Gorton & Denton to “descend into hostility” with a rise in community tensions. He had refused to say whether he would visit the seat and some senior Labour figures raised concerns that he could do more harm than good by doing so. However, Labour is increasingly optimistic that it will win the by-election by convincing undecided voters to back Labour rather than the Greens in a bid to stop Reform UK. While the seat is a three-way battle between Labour, Reform and the Greens, the prime minister is attempting to depict it as a “straight fight” between Labour and Reform.Starmer said: “The battle here is that basic battle between a party that wants to bring our communities together to make sure that everybody in this constituency has their voice heard in parliament through their brilliant Labour candidate, or a party that couldn’t really care less where the constituency is, just wants to use it as a platform for hatred and division and tearing people apart.” – The Times

  • Gorton will descend into hostility if Reform wins, claims Starmer – Daily Telegraph
  • The letter that reveals Starmer knows his leadership is under threat – The i
  • Now loony Greens call for free-for-all on prostitution and porn as by-election nears – Daily Mail
  • Fresh nightmare for Keir Starmer as Labour minister faces ethics probe – Daily Express
  • Sleazy does it. Labour minister is probed by No10 ethics chief for ‘ordering dirty dossier on journalists’ – The Sun
  • Watch: Labour MP’s ‘dark shit’ jibe – Spectator
  • Police calls and ‘dodgy’ leaflets: inside the ‘toxic’ Gorton and Denton by-election – The i

Comment

  • Labour’s by-election panic has triggered a full-blown identity crisis – Tom Harris, Daily Telegraph

‘Let me explain!’ Badenoch tells Lewis, who later apologises for ‘talking over her’ in fiery clash over student loans

“Kemi Badenoch slammed Martin Lewis for talking over her during a fiery clash over student loans. The Tory leader had been discussing repayment plans on Good Morning Britain when the interview was gate-crashed by the money expert. Ms Badenoch was initially being quizzed by hosts Ed Balls and Suzanna Reid over her party’s plans to reform the repayment system this morning. But the trio were visibly taken aback when Mr Lewis unexpectedly stormed onto set to grill the opposition leader over the policy. The TV star interrupted the interview, calling on Ms Badenoch to focus on increasing the salary threshold at which repayments start. During the fiery debate, she found herself involved in a shouting match with former Labour minister Mr Balls and the money expert. Ms Badenoch snapped: “If you want us to have a debate I’m very happy for us to have a debate. “I think people need to know what it is I am talking about, you’re both talking over me, excuse me, let me explain what my policy is.” Mr Balls then apologised to the Tory leader, before she continued to defend the policy and even offered to discuss options with Mr Lewis. She added: ‘I want to make sure that those young people who are paying and paying and their debt is not going down get a relief.” “If you think there is a better offer, let’s look at it. “The whole student loan system is not working properly and someone has to do something.” Viewers were quick to slam the “ambush” on ITV‘s flagship breakfast show” – The Sun

  • Martin Lewis apologises for ambushing Kemi Badenoch live on air – Daily Telegraph
  • Finance hero in debt to Badenoch after gatecrashing her interview – The Times

Editorial

  • The student loans debt young people face is unjust and unsustainable – Daily Telegraph

Philipson unveils SEND policy and ‘four tier’ reforms for supporting kids as critics say the sums don’t add up

“All SEND pupils will be able to get support in school even if they have not been officially classed as requiring extra help, the Government will promise as it unveils a long-awaited shake-up of the system. Reform of the special educational needs and disabilities (SEND) regime in England is designed to end the status quo where an increasing number of children have been given a legal right to extra support beyond the help available in mainstream schools. It will cut the number of costly education, health and care plans (EHCPs) by requiring pupils on a plan to be reassessed when they move from primary to secondary school, and create a four-tier system with differing levels of intervention.” – The i

  • Schools white paper: the key Send policies, winners and losers – The Times
  • More than £430million spent by just ten councils to transport SEND children to schools last year – how much has your local authority spent? – Daily Mail
  • SEND promise.  More than a million kids with SEND to get more help under sweeping school reforms – The Sun

Comment

  • Labour’s Send proposals offer little reassurance for families – Jessie Hewitson, The Times
  • Labour’s Send revolution is a high-stakes experiment. It also threatens precious parental rights – John Harris, Guardian
  • Labour’s special educational needs reforms don’t add up – Joanna Williams, Spectator

UK unemployment to ‘rise above pandemic high within months’

“Unemployment will surge to 5.5pc within months as the jobless rate climbs above the worst months of the pandemic, a Wall Street bank has warned. Economists at JP Morgan said unemployment will hit two million in the first half of the year as businesses hold off hiring in the wake of Rachel Reeves’s £25bn raid on employers’ National Insurance contributions (NICs), which kicked in last April. The 5.5pc prediction compares to a peak of 5.3pc – equating to 1.8 million people – in December 2020. “Over a year has passed since the tax hike and the jobs market is still stagnating,” said Allan Monks, the chief UK economist at JP Morgan. The bank said the advance of artificial intelligence is also suppressing hiring. “Sectors which may be more exposed to AI adoption (eg business services and finance) continue to look relatively weak,” Mr Monks said. He expects employers to regain their confidence and start taking on staff once more later this year.” – Daily Telegraph

News in brief

  • ‘I will never forgive myself for losing top-secret documents on a train’ – Larisa Brown, The Times
  • How WM Police became a tool of the anti-Jewish mob – Brendan O’Neil, Spectator
  • The amnesiocracy governing Britain – Mary Harrington, Unherd
  • Who will save Britain’s lost generation? – Lawrence Newport, CapX

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Trump, USA Men’s Hockey Face Backlash Over Comment On Women’s Team

Published

on

Members of Team USA women's ice hockey celebrate Megan Keller's game-winning overtime goal against Canada at Milano Santagiulia Ice Hockey Arena on Thursday.

President Donald Trump is facing criticism after he joked with the Olympic podium-topping US men’s ice hockey team about having to invite the gold medal-winning American women’s squad to the White House as well.

In a congratulatory phone call with the US men, who took gold at the Winter Olympics for the first time in 46 years, Trump suggested using military aircraft to fly the team out to his State of the Union address on Tuesday before sharing a “very cool” pitch for the team to visit the White House the following day.

“And we have to — I must tell you — we’re going to have to bring the women’s team,” said Trump, who went on to chuckle as the American men burst into laughter in a clip circulating on social media.

He added, “[If I don’t] do that, I do believe I probably would be impeached, OK?”

Advertisement

The clip shows FBI Director Kash Patel, who is facing backlash of his own for guzzling beers with the US men on a reportedly taxpayer-funded trip to Italy, holding the phone as Trump speaks to the team and telling the president in a slurred voice that he can arrange such a visit.

Both the US men and women went undefeated in group stage play at the Winter Olympics and made it through the playoffs before securing gold by defeating the rival Canadians in overtime, by the same score (2-1).

The win for the American women marked their third gold since the Olympic sport’s introduction back in 1998.

A spokesperson for Team USA told NBC News that the White House invited the women’s team to the State Of The Union address and, while they are “sincerely grateful” for the invitation, the players are unable to attend “due to the timing and previously scheduled academic and professional commitments.”

Advertisement

It remains unclear whether members of the men’s squad will make it out to the SOTU address on Tuesday, and if members of either team have committed to visiting the White House the next day or in the future.

HuffPost has reached out to the White House and USA Hockey for comment.

Members of Team USA women's ice hockey celebrate Megan Keller's game-winning overtime goal against Canada at Milano Santagiulia Ice Hockey Arena on Thursday.
Members of Team USA women’s ice hockey celebrate Megan Keller’s game-winning overtime goal against Canada at Milano Santagiulia Ice Hockey Arena on Thursday.

EyesWideOpen via Getty Images

Social media users slammed Trump over his joke, including activist Shannon Watts, who denounced the president on X for “begrudgingly” extending the invite to the gold medal-winning women. She slammed the men’s team for laughing along.

Critics on X called the men in the video “spineless” and characterised the clip as “dispiriting” and “inexcusable.”

Advertisement

One top comment on Reddit described the joke as “absolutely shameful.”

“I wish I was surprised… but god it still turns my stomach knowing I was cheering for them just yesterday,” the commenter wrote of the men’s team.

The U.S. men's ice hockey team poses for a photo after defeating Canada for a gold medal at the Winter Olympics in Milan on Sunday.
The U.S. men’s ice hockey team poses for a photo after defeating Canada for a gold medal at the Winter Olympics in Milan on Sunday.

Petr David Josek via Associated Press

Others in the Reddit thread expressed their disappointment with brothers Quinn and Jack Hughes, the latter of whom scored the golden goal for the US men on Sunday, for appearing to laugh at the joke.

The siblings’ mother, Ellen Weinberg-Hughes, played for the US women’s team in the early ’90s and worked as a player development consultant for the squad in Milan.

Advertisement

Trump’s proposed date for Team USA’s White House visit — Wednesday — notably conflicts with the date that the National Hockey League season is set to resume play following an extended break due to the Winter Olympics.

Professional Women’s Hockey League players are also set to return to the ice on Thursday.

House Speaker Mike Johnson told reporters on Monday he was looking into the logistics of a potential DC visit by the teams.

NHL deputy commissioner Bill Daly told The Athletic that it’s up to the men’s players to decide whether they’d accept such invitations on an individual basis and, thereafter, their teams would have to sign off on such a visit.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Harmful Parenting Phrases To Avoid When Disciplining Kids

Published

on

Telling kids to "stop crying" or saying "they have nothing to cry about" can make them believe that their emotions aren't valid.

As your child is screaming, throwing toys or refusing to listen, it can be easy to say something you don’t really mean when reminding them how they should be acting.

Disciplining kids is tough, especially if you’re also feeling frustrated or mad in the moment. But many of the ways today’s parents were disciplined as children are actually problematic – and experts warn that those approaches shouldn’t trickle down to the next generation.

“Parents discipline the way they were disciplined, even if we don’t realise it,” said Leda Kaveh, a licensed clinical psychologist and owner and director of Washington Psychological Wellness and Washington Insight Solution.

“Parenting behaviours are strongly influenced by early attachment experiences,” Kaveh continued, adding that cultural norms around obedience, as well as chronic stress and financial pressure, play a role.

Advertisement

If you have memories of a parent disciplining you in a way that didn’t feel affirming, there’s a chance you’re doing that to your child, too. (That is, if you haven’t worked through it in therapy or another way.)

Below, therapists share the phrases you really shouldn’t say to kids when disciplining them, and how they can be quite harmful.

“Why can’t you be more like your brother?”

Statements like “Why can’t you be more like your brother” – or sister, neighbour, cousin or whoever – are harmful for kids to hear.

Advertisement

It’s “basically a character attack,” said Nicola Pierre-Smith, a licensed professional counsellor and owner of Melanated Women’s Health in Philadelphia.

There’s also a comparison that’s being made, she noted, which can make the child feel like they’re not enough.

“You’re acting just like your father.”

Similarly, it may be common for some parents to say things like “you’re acting just like your father” or “just like your mother,” particularly if the parents are divorced or in an unhappy marriage.

Advertisement

Generally, this kind of phrase is used when focusing on negative attributes of a parent or when the identified parent figure is a “villain” within the family, according to Pierre-Smith.

Perhaps your mum is known for acting selfishly. If your dad spits out “You’re acting like your mother” after you act up, you’ll likely associate it with your mum’s “bad” behaviour.

This, too, is a character attack, Pierre-Smith explained. “It’s typically not said when there is a positive attribute to the identified person. It is really meant to be a character attack to the child.”

Telling kids to "stop crying" or saying "they have nothing to cry about" can make them believe that their emotions aren't valid.

lechatnoir via Getty Images

Telling kids to “stop crying” or saying “they have nothing to cry about” can make them believe that their emotions aren’t valid.

“You’re such a disappointment.”

Advertisement

For a child who gets in trouble at school and comes home to a parent saying things like, “you’re a disappointment” or “you’re stupid,” it can be really damaging.

These kinds of phrases are meant to shame a child, Pierre-Smith said. This is true whether a parent intends to do this or not.

Research shows that children who experience frequent shame are at higher risk of anxiety and depression, and may grow up with self-worth problems.

“You have nothing to cry about.”

Advertisement

It’s pretty common for parents to shut down any tears or sensitivity during a tense moment. However, doing this is “teaching the child that certain emotions aren’t valid,” Pierre-Smith said.

Rejecting crying may also lead to children being unable to name their emotions, she added.

Kids who repeatedly hear phrases like this aren’t given the opportunity to develop language around emotions or understand what they’re feeling. “They just categorise them into ‘I’m feeling good’ or ‘I’m feeling bad,’ but not having the language to describe that.”

If you slip up and say one of these phrases here and there, it’s OK – but repeating them can be harmful.

Advertisement

Most parents have experienced getting swept up in the moment and saying something to their child that they regret. It’s not the one-off outburst that is inflicting harm. Instead, if you repeatedly discipline your child this way, it can be damaging, Kaveh said.

“When a child hears language that dismisses feelings or labels their behaviours as a personal flaw, the brain often shifts it into a stress response,” Kaveh explained.

“Over time, repeated experiences like this are associated with higher stress hormones such as cortisol, increased anxiety and emotional suppression, lower self-esteem and difficulty identifying and managing emotions later in life … It is a pattern over time that matters.”

If you do find yourself saying these phrases again and again, it’s worth thinking about how you were disciplined as a kid and what you may need to do to work through some of those experiences. Your own upbringing might be informing the way you parent, and it can take work to change, but it is possible.

Advertisement

“The encouraging news is that research shows parenting styles are highly adaptable. Increased awareness, education, therapy, moments of repair can significantly improve the parent-child relationships at any stage,” Kaveh said.

If you find it difficult to manage your emotions when you’re frustrated with your kids, there is “no shame in a parent actually reaching out to a professional or even someone in their school to get support with learning skills,” added Pierre-Smith.

Parents can be firm in their disciplining but should also be emotionally supportive.

“If you look at the research in developmental psychology, it shows that the most effective discipline is both firm and emotionally supportive,” Kaveh said.

Advertisement

“This approach is often also referred to as authoritative parenting, and is consistently associated with better emotional regulation, academic outcomes and mental health,” she noted.

According to Kaveh, effective discipline focuses on teaching, not punishment.

“This includes separating the child from the behaviour, acknowledging emotions while still setting limits and staying calm enough to model regulation,” Kaveh added.

Instead of saying “Stop crying,” you could say something like, “I see you’re really upset. I’m here. We still can’t throw toys, but we can figure out what you need,” she said.

Advertisement

This allows children to feel emotionally understood and receptive to guidance, Kaveh said.

“Feeling safe does not make kids less accountable. It actually makes learning possible,” she said.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Robert Carradine, Lizzie McGuire And Revenge Of The Nerds Star, Dies Aged 71

Published

on

Robert Carradine pictured in 2016

Robert Carradine, known to a generation of viewers as Lizzie McGuire’s father in the hit Disney sitcom, has died at the age of 71.

On Monday evening, Robert’s family announced that he had taken his own life, following what they described as a “nearly two-decade battle with bipolar disorder”.

The family said in a statement to Deadline: “It is with profound sadness that we must share that our beloved father, grandfather, uncle and brother Robert Carradine has passed away.

“In a world that can feel so dark, Bobby was always a beacon on light to everyone around him. We are bereft at the loss of this beautiful soul and want to acknowledge Bobby’s valiant struggle against his nearly two-decade battle with bipolar disorder.

Advertisement

“We hope his journey can shine a light and encourage addressing the stigma that attaches to mental illness. At this time we ask for the privacy to grieve this unfathomable loss. With gratitude for your understanding and compassion.”

Robert Carradine pictured in 2016
Robert Carradine pictured in 2016

Robert’s brother Keith added: “We want people to know it, and there is no shame in it. It is an illness that got the best of him, and I want to celebrate him for his struggle with it, and celebrate his beautiful soul.

“He was profoundly gifted, and we will miss him every day. We will take solace in how funny he could be, how wise and utterly accepting and tolerant he was. That’s who my baby brother was.”

Born into the Carradine acting dynasty, Robert got his start in the industry in TV shows like Bonanza and Kung Fu, as well as the films The Cowboys and Mean Streets.

In the mid-1980s, he appeared as Lewis Skolnick in Revenge Of The Nerds, reprising the role in three sequels in the following decade, and later fronting the TV spin-off King Of The Nerds.

Advertisement
Robert Carradine in character on the set of Revenge Of The Nerds
Robert Carradine in character on the set of Revenge Of The Nerds

To Lizzie McGuire fans, though, he’ll be best remembered for his work as Hilary Duff’s on-screen dad Sam McGuire in both seasons of the teen sitcom and its movie adaptation.

Last year, he appeared alongside Brian Austin Green and Danny Trejo in the Western thriller The Night They Came Home, having completed work on three more movies prior to his death.

Per Deadline, Robert is survived by “his children, grandchildren, brothers, nieces, nephews and anyone who had the honour of having him in their life”.

Help and support:

  • Mind, open Monday to Friday, 9am-6pm on 0300 123 3393.
  • Samaritans offers a listening service which is open 24 hours a day, on 116 123 (UK and ROI – this number is FREE to call and will not appear on your phone bill).
  • CALM (the Campaign Against Living Miserably) offer a helpline open 5pm-midnight, 365 days a year, on 0800 58 58 58, and a webchat service.
  • The Mix is a free support service for people under 25. Call 0808 808 4994 or email help@themix.org.uk
  • Rethink Mental Illness offers practical help through its advice line which can be reached on 0808 801 0525 (Monday to Friday 10am-4pm). More info can be found on rethink.org.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Delroy Lindo Calls Out How Bafta Handled N-Word Tic Incident

Published

on

Michael B. Jordan and Delroy Lindo presenting the Special Visual Effects Award at Sunday night's Baftas

Sinners actor Delroy Lindo has admitted he’s disappointed with the way Bafta reacted to an incident he found himself at the centre of during this year’s ceremony.

On Sunday night, Delroy and Michael B Jordan – who had both been nominated for Baftas off the back of their performances in Sinners – presented the first award of the ceremony, for Best Visual Effects.

During their introductory speech, Tourette’s campaigner John Davidson experienced an involuntary tic and shouted the N-word from the auditorium.

John had been attending the Baftas with the cast and crew of I Swear, a film based on his life story.

Advertisement

After the slur was shouted, the two briefly paused before continuing to present, with host Alan Cumming first thanking the audience for their “understanding” and later apologising to anyone “if you are offended tonight”.

Speaking to Vanity Fair after the event, Delroy said that he and Michael “did what we had to do” by carrying on with the night’s proceedings.

However, he said he wished “someone from Bafta spoke to us afterwards”.

Michael B Jordan and Delroy Lindo presenting on stage at Sunday night's Baftas
Michael B Jordan and Delroy Lindo presenting on stage at Sunday night’s Baftas

Tristan Fewings via Getty Images for BAFTA

On Monday night, Bafta issued an apology to Delroy and Michael in a lengthy statement, taking “full responsibility” for the incident.

Advertisement

“At the Bafta Film Awards last night our guests heard very offensive language that carries incomparable trauma and pain for so many,” Bafta told HuffPost UK. “We want to acknowledge the harm this has caused, address what happened and apologise to all.

“One of our guests, John Davidson MBE, has Tourette Syndrome and has devoted his life to educating and campaigning for better understanding of this condition. Tourette Syndrome causes involuntary verbal tics, that the individual has no control over.

“Such tics are in no way a reflection of an individual’s beliefs and are not intentional. John Davidson is an executive producer of the Bafta-nominated film, I Swear, which is based on his life experience.”

John Davidson at the 2026 Baftas
John Davidson at the 2026 Baftas

Anthony Harvey/Shutterstock

The statement continued: “We take the duty of care to all our guests very seriously and start from a position of inclusion. We took measures to make those in attendance aware of the tics, announcing to the audience before the ceremony began, and throughout, that John was in the room and that they may hear strong language, involuntary noises or movements during the ceremony.

Advertisement

“Early in the ceremony a loud tic in the form of a profoundly offensive term was heard by many people in the room. Michael B Jordan and Delroy Lindo were on stage at the time, and we apologise unreservedly to them, and to all those impacted. We would like to thank Michael and Delroy for their incredible dignity and professionalism.

“During the ceremony, John chose to leave the auditorium and watch the rest of the ceremony from a screen, and we would like to thank him for his dignity and consideration of others, on what should have been a night of celebration for him.

“We take full responsibility for putting our guests in a very difficult situation and we apologise to all. We will learn from this, and keep inclusion at the core of all we do, maintaining our belief in film and storytelling as a critical conduit for compassion and empathy.”

John also spoke out for the first time on Monday, stating: “I am, and always have been, deeply mortified if anyone considers my involuntary tics to be intentional or to carry any meaning.”

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025