Connect with us
DAPA Banner

Politics

Trump Reacts To JD Vance Getting Booed At Winter Olympics

Published

on

President Donald Trump, the moment he heard the news that Vice President JD Vance had been booed at the Winter Olympics opening ceremony.

US president Donald Trump reacted to the news that vice president JD Vance was booed at the Winter Olympics in Milan with a head-scratching claim about his veep.

Video footage from Friday’s opening ceremony showed Vance and wife Usha met with what one Australian broadcaster described as “a lot of boos” from the crowd.

Aboard Air Force One later that day, a reporter asked Trump if he had heard about the booing, prompting a look of surprise from the president.

President Donald Trump, the moment he heard the news that Vice President JD Vance had been booed at the Winter Olympics opening ceremony.
President Donald Trump, the moment he heard the news that Vice President JD Vance had been booed at the Winter Olympics opening ceremony.

Samuel Corum/Getty Images

“No, I didn’t see that,” Trump replied in video from Forbes Breaking News. “Is that true, is that right? It’s surprising, ’cause people like him.”

Advertisement

That’s when Trump made his curious statement.

“Well, I mean he is in a foreign country, in all fairness. But, uh, he doesn’t get booed in this country.”

Vance has been booed in the United States on multiple occasions. He was booed at a firefighters’ union conference in Boston in 2024, during Trump’s presidential campaign. He was booed by protesters in Vermont when he traveled there with his family last March for a ski vacation. He was booed by the audience at the Kennedy Center in Washington DC, the same month. And he was seen being ruthlessly heckled and, yes, booed, in viral video clips from Washington, DC’s Union Station last August.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Politics

The House | As former London Fire Brigade Chief, I believe we must choose the safest restoration option: full decant

Published

on

As former London Fire Brigade Chief, I believe we must choose the safest restoration option: full decant
As former London Fire Brigade Chief, I believe we must choose the safest restoration option: full decant


4 min read

A relatively recent addition to the House of Lords, I have found it fascinating to experience the Palace of Westminster as an occupant rather than in my previous capacity as London Fire Commissioner (LFC) – when I held the legal duty to protect it.

Advertisement

In my current roles as Chair of the National Building Safety Regulator and strategic safety advisor to Transport for London, I continue to have a direct involvement in construction, public, and workplace safety. The restoration and renewal of Parliament is therefore a matter of particular interest.

As we approach a critical decision about how to repair and preserve this magnificent building for the nation, I offer a perspective shaped by decades of experience in safety and risk management, including as a frontline firefighter.

The first point to acknowledge is my newfound understanding of why the building is such a difficult place to leave, even temporarily. Its history and role in our democracy render the decision before us both practical and, for some, existential in nature.

After a career responding to major incidents and addressing the aftermath of tragedies both large and small, I am convinced of the case for choosing a full decant of Parliament during restoration. Safety in ageing buildings never stands still and without significant further intervention, the risks escalate alongside the decaying fabric.

Advertisement

The cost of merely maintaining the status quo and remaining compliant with safety legislation could easily exceed the current annual expenditure of approximately £70 million. Especially if phase one works do not commence and a rational restoration choice is not made.

It is understandable that people compare this project to renovating a home while still living there. But that comparison is simply not reliable. This major restoration requires a large workforce, complex procurement and contracting models, and materials far beyond domestic scale. The standards for a heritage building that is also a heavily used workplace are significantly higher than a family home.

Parliamentarians insisting on robust change control and an accurate budget for the delivery process is both necessary and justified. Based on my experience of some of the largest infrastructure projects, this is set to be among the most complex and large-scale work sites in Europe – making such controls essential.

Advertisement

Furthermore, the work required to bring Westminster up to even basic legal compliance with building regulations is considerably more challenging and expensive than starting from a vacant plot.

Some have argued that if the Palace were truly unsafe, it would have been closed already, thereby casting doubt on the safety case for a decant. This oversimplifies how proportionate regulation operates in a heritage building of this size and occupancy. Regulation involves making almost daily informed decisions by weighing risks and accounting for the building’s ongoing deterioration. It also fails to factor in the increased risk during any chosen renovation programme.

As London’s Fire Commissioner, I oversaw the safety of 20,000 listed buildings. Westminster was the highest risk of all, due to its current state of repair and high occupancy – and all despite it being exceptionally well managed.

The fire loading in the Palace – the amount of combustible material – is extraordinary. Almost no other building in London compares; and its art, architectural features, and collections are priceless. On top of that, it is populated daily by thousands of staff and visitors, including disabled people and others who require additional support to evacuate.

Advertisement

In the event of a major incident, the London Fire Brigade would face difficult choices. Depending on the time of day the safe evacuation of many, many people would almost certainly take precedence over the preservation of the building. Just think about the scale and complexity of that task.

Compounding the fire loading risks are ageing electrical and other utility systems, ongoing hot cutting work as part of maintenance, frequent fire incidents, and access and layout challenges. Its continued safe operation is only made possible by regularly updated fire plans, engineering solutions such as sprinklers and mist sprays, and the outstanding daily work of dedicated safety professionals.

All these challenges come before the arrival of one of the largest renovation projects in the world, which will introduce additional access challenges for firefighting. My extensive experience of safety on construction sites leads me to the firm conclusion that I would not wish to remain on site when major works gets fully underway.

Some will likely disagree or view my concerns as excessive. As a professional firefighter who joined the London Fire Brigade out of a willingness to take risks rather than avoid them, my perspective is grounded in what I’ve experienced rather than caution for its own sake.

Advertisement

Sadly, things can and do go wrong – even in buildings or systems long considered safe enough. I have witnessed too many tragedies and counted out too many bodies to believe the unthinkable cannot happen.

In that spirit, I urge all colleagues across the Palace to make the rational decision: begin enabling works now, regardless of which final option is chosen, and make way gracefully for the renovations to proceed when the time comes.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Nicholas Brendon Remembered In Tributes From Sarah Michelle Gellar And Buffy Cast

Published

on

Sarah Michelle Gellar

The stars of Buffy The Vampire Slayer have been paying their respects following the death of cast member Nicholas Brendon.

Over the weekend, it was announced that Nicholas – best known to Buffy fans for his portrayal of Xander Harris in the supernatural series – had died at the age of 54.

His family told CNN that the actor had died in his sleep, of natural causes.

In a statement, they said: “Most people know Nicky for his work as an actor and for the characters he brought to life over the years. In recent years Nicky has found his passion in painting and art.

Advertisement

“Nicky loved to share his enthusiastic talent with his family, friends and fans. He was passionate, sensitive, and endlessly driven to create. Those who truly knew him understood that his art was one of the purest reflections of who he was.”

His spokesperson later clarified: “While it’s no secret that Nicholas had struggles in the past, he was on medications and treatment to manage his diagnosis, and he was optimistic about the future at the time of his passing.”

Following the news, his Buffy co-stars paid tribute, with Sarah Michelle Gellar sharing a quote from the show alongside the message: “I saw you Nicky. I know you are at peace, in that big rocking chair in the sky.”

Sarah Michelle Gellar

David Boreanaz wrote: “There are people you work with and then there are people you share time with. Nick was the latter.

“Some moments stay small on paper, a laugh between takes, a look that says ‘we got this’, the quiet understanding of showing up and doing the work together. But those are the things that last.

Advertisement

“He carried something real, not perfect, not polished, just real. And in this business that matters more than most things.”

Alyson Hannigan also thanked her late co-star for “years of laughter, love and Dodgers”, while Charisma Carpenter said: “I will miss the version of the man I once knew – someone who was so warm and loving. He was cuddly, funny, silly, self-deprecating, and supremely talented. I loved every scene we had together back in the day.”

Outside of Buffy, Nicholas played Kevin Lynch in Criminal Minds, as well as appearing in shows like Private Practice and Faking It.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Nato Chief Mark Rutte Won’t Even Condemn Trump For Calling Allies ‘Cowards’

Published

on

Nato Chief Mark Rutte Won't Even Condemn Trump For Calling Allies 'Cowards'

Nato’s secretary-general refused to push back against Donald Trump after the US president described the alliance as a “paper tiger” made up of “cowards”.

Trump lashed out at the defensive organisation over the weekend for refusing to support for his ongoing attacks on Iran.

But, when asked for his response to Trump’s attack, Mark Rutte seemed to offer little rebuttal – and even justified the US’s controversial decision not to warn their allies about the initial strikes on Tehran ahead of time.

He told CBS’s Face The Nation: “I’ve been in several conversations this week with the president and the good news is that, look, we had the US for weeks planning for Epic Fury.

Advertisement

“For reasons of security and safety, they could not share with European allies and allies around the world and partner countries, because that would have jeopardised the effect of the first attack.”

He claimed: “It’s only logical that European countries take a couple of weeks to come together.

“Since Thursday, 22 countries – most of them Nato but also Japan, Korea, Australia, New Zealand, Bahrain, the UAE – have come together to answer three questions: what do we need, when do we need it and where do we need it?

“These three questions we are going to work through to answer the president’s call to make sure that we secure the free-sailing through the Strait of Hormuz.”

Advertisement

On Friday, Trump wrote on TruthSocial: “Without the U.S.A., NATO IS A PAPER TIGER! They didn’t want to join the fight to stop a Nuclear Powered Iran.

“Now that fight is Militarily WON, with very little danger for them, they complain about the high oil prices they are forced to pay, but don’t want to help open the Strait of Hormuz, a simple military maneuver that is the single reason for the high oil prices.

“So easy for them to do, with so little risk. COWARDS, and we will REMEMBER!”

This is not the first time Rutte has gone overboard to praise Trump – he famously called the president “daddy” in June last year.

Advertisement

Pressure on the White House is rising as oil prices continue to climb following Iran’s effective closure of the major oil shipping lane, the Strait of Hormuz.

Trump has called on his allies to send warships to help keep the waterway open, but so far none have leapt to support his aggression.

The US president also appeared to openly mock Keir Starmer by sharing a skit from SNL UK where the prime minister was terrified of speaking to Trump.

The two spoke on the phone hours later about the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz, though it’s unclear if the sketch was mentioned.

Advertisement

Housing minister Matthew Pennycook played down the implicit criticism, telling Good Morning Britain on Monday: “If our prime minister had time to watch that skit, I think he’d see it in the light it’s intended. It’s a piece of comedy.”

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

The House Opinion Article | The Professor Will See You Now: Signatures

Published

on

The Professor Will See You Now: Signatures
The Professor Will See You Now: Signatures

Illustration by Tracy Worrall


4 min read

Lessons in political science. This week: signatures

Advertisement

Marking student work recently, I came across the claim that most Early Day Motions (EDMs) attract only one or two signatures. How can students get it so badly wrong? I blame the teacher.

Then I noticed that they had sourced the claim to the House of Commons website. They must be misquoting? But no. There it is in black and white: “In an average session, only six or seven EDMs reach over 200 signatures. Around 70 or 80 get over 100 signatures. The majority will attract only one or two signatures.”

Now the poor teacher really was confused. Had things changed recently? Because I know how to enjoy myself, I went to the online EDM database and checked. So far this session, around 10 per cent of EDMs have garnered just one or two signatures. Given its length, perhaps this isn’t an average session, but the EDM database goes back to 1989, and contains 59,000 EDMs; of those around 4,500 (eight per cent) had just one or two signatories. Whether it’s eight or 10 per cent, then, it’s not a majority. 

Advertisement

The source of the error, I think, is that older library briefings used to say that “quite a number will attract only one or a couple of signatures”, and at some point this has been mangled, with “quite a number” becoming “the majority”. See me after class.

What I wasn’t aware of until I looked into this – and this is a sign of things changing – was that that quote above is now also wrong at the top end. Of the 3,000 or so EDMs this session, how many have attracted over 200 signatures? Answer: none. There were also none in the whole of the last parliament.

It used to be true. Between 1989 and 2019, 452 EDMs attracted more than 200 signatories; that’s roughly 15 a year. But since 2019: nada. I am not entirely sure why.

Advertisement

The record-breaker, with 503 signatures, came in 2001-2. It urged the governments of India and Pakistan to seek to resolve their differences peacefully and to reduce the risks of nuclear conflict. Which is nice. 

The EDM database is another example of Kids These Days Having It So Good. When I first started out, you had to code this stuff by hand; now, you can get the data with a click or two of a button. The ground-breaking 1961 book by Finer et al that looked at EDMs as a measure of backbench opinion, an early attempt to treat parliamentary behaviour quantitatively, studied just one parliament – at a time when EDMs were far less numerous than today – and still took two years to produce. 

That book was the subject of a very sniffy review by Richard Crossman in the Guardian, dismissing it as “statistical gamesmanship” and “pretentious pedantry”. Anthony Howard in the New Statesman similarly put the boot in (“academic naivete can surely never have been taken further”). It was an early example of political practitioners meeting political science and not being overly impressed; it was sadly not to be the last.

Yet reading their reviews now, more than 60 years on, it’s difficult not to conclude they hadn’t slightly missed the point – and were just terrified of anything involving numbers.

Advertisement

 Of course, MPs sign (or don’t) EDMs for all sorts of reasons, many of them trivial, and on their own they don’t tell you very much about political opinions. But the patterns displayed en masse can still be revealing. More recent studies of EDMs, for example, have found links to gender, religion, marginality and so on. An individual EDM can sometimes be just noise; collectively however they are a signal. EDMs are often dismissed as parliamentary graffiti, but even graffiti can sometimes be revealing.

One of the authors of that study, the late great Hugh Berrington, mischievously began the follow up volume with a quotation from Crossman, taken from a debate in the Commons: “We have to be numerate as well as literate.”

A coda – Berrington is also the source of a much-loved quote on the psychology of top politicians: “If it is lonely at the top, it is because it is the lonely who seek to climb there.” Discuss. 

Further reading: S Finer et al, Backbench Opinion in the House of Commons 1955-1959 (1961); H Berrington, Backbench Opinion in the House of Commons 1945-55 (1973)

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Saturday Night Live UK Gets Off To A Flying Start In Ratings And Reviews

Published

on

Saturday Night Live UK Gets Off To A Flying Start In Ratings And Reviews

The first episode of Saturday Night Live UK went down a storm with both viewers and critics.

Over the weekend, SNL launched its UK counterpart with Tina Fey as the inaugural guest host.

While there may have initially been questions raised about how well the format would translate across the Atlantic, the episode has received a wave of praise – and pulled in some impressive viewing figures.

According to BARB data, SNL UK had a 3.2% share, with just shy of a quarter of a million people watching live on Saturday night.

Advertisement

While at first glance, this figure (226,000 viewers) might seem a little on the low side, it’s important to keep in mind that these are big numbers for a pay-TV channel like Sky.

Impressively, SNL UK also managed to pull in a bigger audience than Channel 4’s offering in the same timeslot, the Mission: Impossible movie Rogue Nation.

Critical reception to the episode has also been pretty positive.

Advertisement

The Guardian gave it three stars, as did The Independent, with the former calling the broadcast promising for the rest of the series and “refreshing” in its ambitiousness, while the latter praised its “willingness to push the envelope” and “notes of new ingredients that could offer something fresh”.

Meanwhile, The Telegraph was even more impressed, calling the show “shockingly competent” in its own four-star review, while Metro claimed that SNL UK was an “astonishing achievement” that “might just mark the beginning of a new era in British comedy”.

A slightly more critical piece in The Times said: “This show’s success could only ever be a good thing. That day might come, and there are small signs in this first outing that it might. I do not want to condemn this whole endeavour outright. But the spark is not there yet.”

This piece also argued that if the show leans more into its British sensibilities, “we could be in business here”. “SNL UK needs work, but I’m not giving up on it yet,” its critic concluded.

Advertisement

However, reviews from US outlets seemed less enthused with the British spin-off.

Deadline called it “painful” and “beyond seriously unfunny”, while Variety, like The Times, pointed out the show was at its best when it “took the basics of what makes the US version successful – sketch comedy, rotating guest hosts and the unpredictability of live television – and left the Brits to it”.

Before episode one had even aired, it was announced that the first season of SNL UK had been extended by an additional two episodes.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Greg Davies Replaces Alan Cumming As TV Baftas’ New Host

Published

on

Alan Cumming hosting last year's TV Baftas

Greg Davies has been unveiled as the new presenter of the TV Baftas, following the departure of outgoing host Alan Cumming.

On Monday morning, it was confirmed that Greg would front the TV Baftas when they take place in May at London’s Royal Festival Hall.

“I see the whole event as an opportunity to wave a flag for this beloved medium and, with the exception of one commissioner, two execs and a co-star that I have personal beef with, I will do everything I can to ensure it’s a night of warm celebration for all,” the Taskmaster host joked.

Alan previously hosted last year’s TV Baftas, and later took over from David Tennant as the presenter of the awards show’s film counterpart earlier this year.

Advertisement
Alan Cumming hosting last year's TV Baftas
Alan Cumming hosting last year’s TV Baftas

John Phillips via Getty Images for BAFTA

However, it’s not clear whether he will return after branding the most recent Baftas a “trauma-triggering shitshow”.

Responding to the much-publicised incident from this year’s Baftas, in which Tourette’s campaigner John Davidson experienced involuntary tics resulting in him shouting the N-word while Sinners actors Michael B Jordan and Delroy Lindo were presenting an award, Alan wrote: “What should have been an evening celebrating creativity as well as diversity and inclusion turned into a trauma-triggering shitshow.

“I’m so sorry for all the pain Black people have felt at hearing that word echoed round the world. I’m so sorry the Tourette’s community has been reminded of the lack of understanding and tolerance that abounds regarding their condition.

“The only possible good that could come of this is a reminder that words matter, that rushing to judgement about things of which we are not fully cognisant is folly, that all trauma must be recognised and honoured.”

Advertisement

“We were all let down by decisions made to both broadcast slurs and censor free speech,” he concluded, referring to the fact that the BBC failed to censor the slur despite the awards show airing on a two-hour time delay, while cutting short one politically-charged acceptance speech.

“Congratulations to all the artists whose work was overshadowed by the night’s events.”

The nominees at the 2026 TV Baftas will be announced on Tuesday at 12pm.

Last week, the contenders for the Memorable TV Moment category, as voted for by the public, were unveiled.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Karen Hauer Quits Strictly Come Dancing After 14 Seasons

Published

on

Karen Hauer dancing with Harry Aikines-Aryeetey on what would turn out to be her final season of Strictly

Strictly Come Dancing professional Karen Hauer has confirmed rumours that she has quit the show after 14 seasons.

Earlier this month, Karen was one of five Strictly pros reported to be leaving the show in a shake-up ahead of this year’s season, with Nadiya Bychkova, Gorka Márquez, Luba Mushtuk and Michelle Tsiakkas also tipped to not be returning.

While Nadiya, Gorka, Luba and Michelle have all remained tight-lipped on the rumours, Karen announced over the weekend that that she would not be back on the BBC dance show in 2026.

Posting on Sunday, the Venezuelan-American performer – who had been the longest-serving dancer in the show’s current troupe, and the longest-serving female dancer in its history – told her Instagram followers: “After 14 years on Strictly Come Dancing, I’ve decided this is the right time for me to close this chapter and take on new projects in other areas that I’m passionate about.

Advertisement

“Strictly completely changed my life, not only as a performer and a teacher, but as a human being. I’ve had the privilege of meeting so many incredible people, and brilliant celebrity partners who have become close friends and people I admire so much.

“None of this would have been possible without the amazing fans. You’ve been there since day one, when I’d just moved to the UK and had no idea what I was getting myself into. I’m so grateful. You watched me grow over the years, and witnessed all of my different hairstyles!

“I’m going to miss everyone who makes the show possible, from hair, makeup, wardrobe, the crew behind the cameras, lighting, production and staging, the runners, Dave Arch and the band, the singers, and the producers and welfare team who take such good care of us. It’s an incredible machine powered by brilliant people. To my fellow professional dancers who I adore, I will always be cheering you on. You truly are the best in the business.”

Karen Hauer dancing with Harry Aikines-Aryeetey on what would turn out to be her final season of Strictly
Karen Hauer dancing with Harry Aikines-Aryeetey on what would turn out to be her final season of Strictly

She continued: “I’ll never forget joining the show 14 years ago with Sir Bruce Forsyth and Len Goodman and learning from such incredible legends along the way. And to the brilliant Tess [Daly] and Claudia [Winkleman], maybe now we can finally be ladies who lunch in the autumn.

“I’ll even miss standing in front of the judges, can you believe that? Smiling politely while sometimes secretly disagreeing. It’s been an honour to share the ballroom with them.”

Advertisement

“Now, this isn’t a goodbye,” she insisted. “It’s simply ‘see you later’. Because I will never stop dancing.

“Who would have thought that a young girl from the Bronx would end up becoming the longest-serving female professional dancer on a British TV institution? Strictly will always be in my heart. I love you all.”

A number of Karen’s Strictly colleagues, including Nadiya Bychkova, Luba Mushtuk, Nancy Xu, Vito Coppola, Jowita Pryztal and Lauren Oakley have been sharing their love in the comments.

“There’s no one like you K, we love you mamasita!” Johannes Radebe wrote, while Dianne Buswell told her she was “always a star”.

Advertisement

Over the course of her time on Strictly, Karen was paired with Westlife singer Nicky Byrne, TV chef Dave Myers, reality star Mark Wright, broadcaster Jeremy Vine, pop singer Will Young, daytime presenter Simon Rimmer and actor Charles Venn.

More recently, she’s danced with comedian Chris Ramsey, reality-TV-personality-turned-podcaster Jamie Laing, performer Greg Wise, stand-up comics Jayde Adams and Eddie Kadi, football legend Paul Merson and Gladiators fave Harry “Nitro” Aikines-Aryeetey.

She made it to the Strictly final twice, with Mark Wright and Jamie Laing.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Chappell Roan Sets The Record Straight After Footballer Jorginho Drama

Published

on

Jorginho of Brazil's Flamengo celebrates after scoring his side's second goal, from the penalty spot, during the Recopa Sudamericana second leg final soccer match against Argentina's Lanus in Rio de Janeiro, Thursday, Feb. 26, 2026. (AP Photo/Bruna Prado)

Chappell Roan has spoken out for the first time after finding herself in the centre of a media storm when Brazilian footballer Jorginho accused her security team of making his 11-year-old stepdaughter cry.

On Saturday, the Pink Pony Club singer was the subject of a lengthy post shared on Jorghino’s Instagram story about a “very upsetting” incident.

“I went through a very upsetting situation with my family earlier today,” the post began. “My wife is in São Paulo for [Lollapallooza Brazil, where Chappell was headlining]. This morning, my daughter woke up incredibly excited, she even made a sign because she was so happy to see an artist she really admires, or used to admire. By coincidence, they’re staying at the same hotel as this artist.

“During breakfast, the artist walked past their table. My daughter, like any child, recognised her, got excited, and just wanted to make sure it was really her. And the worst part is she didn’t even approach her. She simply walked past the singer’s table, looked to confirm it was her, smiled, and went back to sit with her mum. She didn’t say anything, didn’t ask for anything.

Advertisement

“What happened next was completely disproportionate.”

Jorginho of Brazil's Flamengo celebrates after scoring his side's second goal, from the penalty spot, during the Recopa Sudamericana second leg final soccer match against Argentina's Lanus in Rio de Janeiro, Thursday, Feb. 26, 2026. (AP Photo/Bruna Prado)
Jorginho of Brazil’s Flamengo celebrates after scoring his side’s second goal, from the penalty spot, during the Recopa Sudamericana second leg final soccer match against Argentina’s Lanus in Rio de Janeiro, Thursday, Feb. 26, 2026. (AP Photo/Bruna Prado)

The footballer continued: “A large security guard came over to their table while they were still having breakfast and began speaking in an extremely aggressive manner to both my wife and my daughter, saying that she shouldn’t allow my daughter to ‘disrespect’ or ‘harass’ other people.

“Honestly, I don’t know at what point simply walking past a table and looking to see if someone is there can be considered harassment. He even said he would file a complaint against them with the hotel, while my 11-year-old daughter was sitting there in tears. My daughter was extremely shaken and cried a lot.

“I’ve lived with football, public exposure, and well-known people for many years, and I understand very well what respect and boundaries are. What happened there was not that. It was just a child admiring someone.”

He added: “It’s sad to see this kind of treatment coming from those who should understand the importance of fans. At the end of the day, they are the ones who build all of this.

Advertisement

“I sincerely hope this serves as a moment of reflection. No one should have to go through this, especially not a child.”

Addressing Chappell directly, he said that “without your fans, you would be nothing”, before telling Chappell’s supporters “she does not deserve your affection”.

Jorghino’s post subsequently blew up on social media, with even the mayor of Rio de Janeiro claiming that he’d banned Chappell from every headlining at the Todo Mundo No Rio music festival in the future.

Responding later in the weekend, the Grammy winner insisted in her own Instagram story posts that she had been oblivious about the incident until she read about it online.

Advertisement

“I didn’t even see,” Chappell claimed. “I didn’t even see a woman and a child. Like, I did not.

“No one came up to me. No one bothered me. Like, I was just sitting at breakfast in my hotel. I think these people were staying at the hotel as well.”

She continued “I did not ask the security guard to go up and talk to this mother and child. I did not – they did not come up to me! They weren’t doing anything! It’s unfair for security to just assume someone doesn’t have good intentions when they have no reason to believe because there’s no action even taken…

“I do not hate people who are fans of my music. I do not hate children. Like, that is crazy. And I’m sorry to the mother and child that someone was assuming something, that you would do something and that if you felt uncomfortable, that makes me really sad. You did not deserve that.”

Advertisement

The girl in question’s mother, Catherine Harding, has since shared her own six-minute statement on the matter, insisting that the security guard who confronted her 11-year-old “100% was not a security guard of the hotel” and “looks after artists”.

“I don’t know that it was her personal security guard, but he was with her, so that is all I know,” she claimed.

Jorginho is the stepfather to Catherine’s 11-year-old daughter, whose father is the actor Jude Law.

The sports icon has been married to Catherine since last year, with the pair also welcoming a son in 2020.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

BBC Expert Iran Not Defeated Despite Trump Claims

Published

on

BBC Expert Iran Not Defeated Despite Trump Claims

A BBC expert has warned that Iran “is not defeated yet” despite Donald Trump’s repeated claims that America has already won the war.

Security correspondent Frank Gardner said the regime in Tehran is “playing the long game” in the face of the US president’s latest threats.

At the weekend, Trump gave Iran 48 hours to re-open the Strait of Hormuz or face it’s power plants being “obliterated” by US missiles.

With that deadline set to expire at around midnight UK time, there is no sign of Tehran acceding to the president’s request.

Advertisement

Instead, Gardner said Iran was prepared to respond in kind against other Gulf nations, thereby prolonging the war.

Speaking to Radio 4′s Today programme from Doha, he said: “I don’t think anyone doubts that if Donald Trump goes through with this ultimatum – and he doesn’t always do that – there is a real concern that if power plants were hit by Iran here on this side of the Gulf, potentially that could effect things like desalination, which provides the drinking water for the Gulf.

“Millions of people depend on these plants to have their daily drinking water. Summer is approaching, daytime temperatures are above 30 degrees, that would be a crisis. And Iran knows that. It’s played a very clever strategic game.

“It may have lost tactically, huge amounts of hardware and commanders. But it’s playing the long game and it’s not defeated yet.”

Advertisement

Gardner also said that Iranian retaliatory attacks were shaking the confidence of Americas allies in the region.

“Governments here have to worry whether their strategic alliance with the United States is making them more vulnerable, not less,” he said.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Unlike McSweeney’s mobile phone, there’s no mystery to the disappearance of Starmer’s ‘popularity’

Published

on

Unlike McSweeney's mobile phone, there's no mystery to the disappearance of Starmer's 'popularity'

How did Liz Truss make this job look so easy?!

Saturday Night Live UK – ‘Starmer and Lammy discuss calling Trump’ sketch

 

A sharp line, in a clever sketch, in a better than expect launch show, seems to have tickled President Trump so much he actually posted it online. He’s gone from liking, to lambasting, to laughing at Keir Starmer.

Advertisement

As you read this, the PM is about to chair a meeting of COBRA – or more accurately in Cabinet Office Briefing Room A – where whether involved or not war comes to bite you at home, on your latest ‘number one commitment’, the cost of living.

This page is too small to count the times over the years Trump has embarrassed his country, himself, and his own family so I’m not blowing the trumpet for him here, but it’s not good for either when a US President is laughing at a UK PM.

It’s particularly awkward because after twenty months of demonstrating – as the skit has him saying, with a savagely accurate parody of his grating nasal tones – “I’m out of my depth here” he’d actually been clawing back some modicum of credibility for not ‘giving in to Trump’ a man more unpopular here than our most unpopular PM and astonishingly it would seem less popular that an actual despotic Ayatollah.

There was a stirring of what’s left of life-in-the-left-for-Stamer last night as some argued it was simply disrespectful of Trump to belittle Britain. Unhappily I suspect this defence sits solidly in Kemi Badenoch’s response some months ago when Starmer said she was running the country down:I’m not talking the country down; I’m talking him down

Advertisement

His life raft idea of trying, at every single opportunity to pretend Badenoch is some missile riding warmonger who just can’t wait to get  stuck into Iran is undermined not just because it wilfully bends what she actually said but more importantly, our service men and women are involved and in harms way whether our PM likes it or not, and most of all “not being involved” has had no dividend whatsoever in the eyes of the Iranian regime.

Season 5 of the Chagos Islands – where the story is surely getting more and more surreal on the future of the deal itself – has seen Yvette Cooper  acknowledge an Iranian attempt to strike the Diego Garcia base but keep broadcasting how we are not involved and won’t be involved to all our allies.

Those allies in the Gulf and elsewhwere are definitely watching, and I can tell you they aren’t impressed. The incident creating as big a target for more satire as the airbase ownership saga has become. A former Tory MP quipping:

The PM is probably consulting Lord Hermer on the correct level of compensation to offer Iran for the loss of their missile

Advertisement

One of which that we did not deal with but the US did.

As one of our non-political yet very highly qualified and peer acknowledged defence and strategic minds pointed out to me

“Healey has disappeared. Cooper is transparent. And Starmer cannot say a sentence without contradicting himself. Good grief. It’s like they’re systematically failing not just at reading the international room. They’re systematically failing at any basic political instinct about it”

Of course looking at their polling – and no I’m not ignoring Conservative numbers – and Labour’s predicted results in May, a lot of their comments are not about an international room but domestic voters. But the compromise won’t work. The dividend of ‘not being involved’ won’t stop Labour votes going elsewhere especially the Greens.

Advertisement

So I understand. This is ConservativeHome, maybe I would say all this wouldn’t I? But such an observation would be to ignore the signs and issues coming from inside Labour itself.

There’s a satire to be done on the hunt for Morgan McSweeney’s mobile. One wag on X asking if anyone had looked in Louise Haigh’s handbag. But it means the stink about the way the PM appointed Mandelson and gamed the process just won’t go away.

A political Poirot has ensued; when was it stolen? in what circumstances? where is the record of it being reported to police – The PM’s Chief of Staff’s phone gets stolen? Trust me that would be a big red klaxon to all so some record should exist, and anyway why aren’t the McSweeney-Mandelson WhatsApps recoverable or in the cloud.

If everything is rosy in the red rose brigade why is Al Cairns talking about where he learned leadership, and Angela Rayner being helped by a Labour donor (who once tried and utterly failed to have yours truly ejected from a London hotel for ‘being a Tory’) to rain fire on the Starmer project and programme?  Why is whatever Starmerism is getting systematically targeted by increasingly transparent attempts to bring it down from within.

Advertisement

I’m going to talk more about my weekend at the Freedom Festival at the Margaret Thatcher Centre at the University of Buckingham in my next piece – but to conclude this one I was struck by something a close friend of Lady Thatcher discussed with me there.

Our starting point was that if Starmerism is really dead, it should be no more mourned than the ‘Blairite settlement’ that is also definitively dead. Part of that settlement was an assumption that you build a broad coalition of voters piece by piece, issue by issue, focus group by focus group, with promises for almost all to get that landslide.

In less than two years we’ve seen those groups peel away as the conceit unravelled on first contact with reality. They had won in 2024 because people were extremely fed up with the Conservatives and argued they simply didn’t know what they stood for anymore.

And there was where we discussed that bit of Thatcherism very much worth still keeping in mind, like Hayek’s Constitution of Liberty being thrown on the table and the silencing of the room with “This is what we believe!

Advertisement

Today that means, no lawyerly language to seem present but not involved, but say our alliance is with America not one man.

To probe, how and why, because it genuinely matters, a man who remained friends with the world’s most infamous paedophile and sex trafficker was sent to be ‘our bridge’ to that ally, and wasn’t an instant principled driven ‘no’.

To say to her party, once Thatcher’s now Badenoch’s, with clarity and conviction: “this is what I believe in, this is what I’m going to do. It will be honest and direct. It may not always be easy to hear but it will be the right thing to do. This is what we believe and if you do too, vote for it”

Starmer tried to be the more moral, more principled, more straight, more genuine, to get to be Prime Minister but it was a façade built to appeal to the widest possible section of an ultimately fragmented network of niche wishes. Be honest and authentic – where the voter goes away and doesn’t have to like you but respects you – because they know exactly who you are and what you believe.

Advertisement

I’d take that path any day and it limits the amount they’ll ever end up laughing at you.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025