Israel’s opposition leader, Yair Lapid, is trending online for clapping back at Netanyahu. He accuses Israel’s prime minister of fighting multifront wars with “no strategy” that will “collapse” the army.

Israeli opposition leader Yair Lapid has criticised Netanyahu’s government for fighting multi-front wars ‘without a strategy’, and says Israel’s military forces are ‘in collapse’ as they continue attacks in Iran, invade southern Lebanon and occupy Gaza and the West Bank. pic.twitter.com/DtTvSK9vBG

— Al Jazeera English (@AJEnglish) March 27, 2026

Yair Lapid shared a post—viewed by 1 million users— warning that Israel is facing a security disaster and that the military is “on the verge of collapse.”

He cited Chief of Staff, Lt. Gen. Eyal Zamir, who sounded the same alarm to political-security cabinet. In a veiled message to Netanyahu, he Lapid said:

Anyone who heard him yesterday will not be able to say, “I didn’t know.”

‼️ Former Israeli PM Yair Lapid says Chief of Staff Eyal Zamir warned the cabinet the IDF is “on the verge of collapse,” citing exhausted reserves & overstretched forces.

Lapid said, Zamir told the cabinet:
•“I’m raising 10 red flags.”
•“The IDF is on the verge of collapse.”… https://t.co/7IWIuP17oc pic.twitter.com/jQhldC3AIj

— Hala Jaber (@HalaJaber) March 27, 2026

According to Lapid, Zamir raised multiple red flags, citing a reserve system under strain, soldiers stretched beyond their limits, and exhausted reservists on their sixth and seventh rotations. Zamir reportedly warned that troops are also being diverted to the West Bank to address settler violence.

Haaretz reported that Israel was losing its sway over Trump, according to the IDF chief.

Israel losing sway over Trump on Iran war course as IDF chief raises ’10 red flags’https://t.co/e1ZJOuBHWr

— Haaretz.com (@haaretzcom) March 26, 2026

The IDF could soon collapse if there is no solution to the shortage of manpower, IDF Chief of Staff Lt.-Gen. Eyal Zamir warned in remarks during a security cabinet meeting held on Wednesday.
Reporting by: @keshet_neev @Jeremybob1 https://t.co/DZ4TN6nDzv

— The Jerusalem Post (@Jerusalem_Post) March 26, 2026

Manpower shortages have also been emphasised by Israeli media outlets and social media users alike.

IDF Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Eyal Zamir warned during a security cabinet meeting that the military will “collapse in on itself,” as it faces mounting operational demands and a growing manpower shortage.https://t.co/nIrsgIZcQ2 pic.twitter.com/EfHkrwzYYh

— Glenn Diesen (@Glenn_Diesen) March 26, 2026

Advertisement

However, some were doubtful that Lapid would have behaved differently from Netanyahu if he were in power.

Journalist Chris Fitzgerald argued that Yair Lapid’s criticism is hypocritical because Lapid would pursue the same approach as Netanyahu if he were in power. He added that support for the empire and colonization is not limited to one side of Israeli politics.

What’s so idiotic is Lapid as leader would do the exact same thing as Netanyahu.

Empire and colonisation are bipartisan in Israel. https://t.co/HR270lRNSR

— Chris Fitzgerald (@ChrisFitzMelb) March 27, 2026

Advertisement

Featured image via the Canary

Poverty levels have increased slightly during the first year of a Labour government, new data from Households Below Average Income (HBAI) shows.

Half a million more in poverty

Comparisons between data gathered between 2023/24 and 2024/25 show that half a million more people are living in poverty. This amounts to around one in five people (20%), or 13.4 million.

The data further reveals there are 5.5 million families living in poverty where one person has a disability, or 4 in 10 of all people in poverty. 4 million children are also living in poverty.

Pensioner poverty has also increased. This follows one of the most controversial policies announced by Labour when it entered office in 2024: its cuts to Winter Fuel Payments. In 2025, the government u-turned on the decision. Nevertheless, there been an increase of 200,000 pensioners living in poverty.

London and Wales worst affected

Poverty is highest in London and lowest in the North of Ireland.

Both London and Wales have seen increases in overall poverty and child poverty. Meanwhile, the West Midlands and South West have seen reductions.

The number of people with very low food security has also fallen overall, but 3.1 million people still went hungry because of a lack of money. This figure remains over 40% higher than it was in 2021/22.

Household incomes have risen on average over the last year, both before and after housing costs. However, they have fallen further for those on incomes already in the bottom 10%, remaining below 2021/22 levels.

Peter Matejic, chief analyst at the Joseph Rowntree Foundation, said:

The latest statistics show overall poverty rose slightly and there was little change in child poverty in the first year of the Labour government.

We expect to see the number of children growing up in poverty fall as a result of the government’s decision to remove the two-child limit from April 2026. That will mark a much-needed improvement, but our projections show progress flatlines after that and more will be needed to make sure child poverty continues to reduce.

The bottom line is that far too many families are still in poverty.

A change in method

The HBAI has changed its method for gathering data from survey responses to administrative data. This is deemed to be more accurate and represents the most significant change in method for a generation.

Better measurements may help quantify the scale of the issue, but they do nothing to improve anyone’s situation.

People living on a low income in the UK continue to struggle to afford the essentials. The Canary recently reported on new research by the Social Workers Union, which revealed many social workers are paying for basic essentials out of their own pockets to help their service users.

Food bank use also remains close to record levels, with many continuing to experience the stigma and trauma of living in poverty.

Featured image via the Canary

London-based law firm Hodge Jones & Allen LLP has written to the Metropolitan police challenging its revised policy on Palestine Action support. The firm has warned that any arrests the Met makes under the policy are likely to be unlawful.

The letter, written on behalf of campaign group Defend Our Juries, comes after a shock U-turn from the Met. Late on 25 March, the force announced that it will resume arrests under Terrorism legislation for people holding signs referencing support for protest group Palestine Action. This is despite the High Court ruling in February that the proscription of the group was unlawful.

This is a complete departure from the Met’s previous position. In an initial response to the ruling, the Met announced in February that it would stop making arrests of people showing support for the group. It said it would focus on collecting evidence instead.

While the Court stayed the effect of its judgment pending a government appeal, Hodge Jones & Allen argues that any arrests in the interim would be unlawful. This places significant pressure on the Met to justify its new position.

The letter states:

The Metropolitan police’s position is based on a misunderstanding of the legal position and will produce profoundly unfair results and unlawful arrests.

The decision of the High Court to ‘stay’ the effect of their ruling is not determinative of the legal position.

The Metropolitan police should have due regard, when assessing whether to conduct an action such arrest, to the fact that the High Court has unanimously found the legal position to be unlawful. Pending any successful appeal, that is an authoritative statement of the legal framework at present.

The letter highlights that courts have already adjourned all trials connected to the Defend Our Juries “Lift the Ban” campaign. Prosecutors themselves have indicated that proceedings should not continue until the legal framework is clarified. This would make any arrests futile as well as unlawful, since prosecutors can’t charge or conclude cases.

The letter continues:

In view of the difficulties in any case being charged or being concluded with a trial, we can see no merit in any arrest. We submit as follows:

Firstly, we fail to see how any arrest allows an officer to have reasonable suspicion that an offence has been committed nor that the “necessity” condition under s24 PACE 1984 is fulfilled. If an officer considers that there may be an offence, then the previous policy of monitoring and collecting evidence is sufficient.

Secondly, those seeking to take part in the “Lift the Ban Campaign” are exercising their rights under Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights.

It is clear that this is a campaign aimed at de-proscription. Any arrest is an interference with that right, and in these circumstances cannot be considered proportionate.

Advertisement

Therefore, we regard any arrest as unlawful.

Why is expressing support for Palestine Action suddenly arrestable again?

The Met’s previous position was that a “focus on gathering evidence”, rather than arrests, would be “the most proportionate approach”. It is unclear what has prompted the force to change their assessment of proportionality, other than recent correspondence with Defend Our Juries.

On 19 March, Defend Our Juries wrote to the Met commissioner, Mark Rowley, to raise the case of a woman arrested on 15 March. Police arrested her for holding a sign expressing support for Palestine Action, in breach of the Met’s policy at the time. The group was not consulted prior to the policy change announced on 25 March, and further mass arrests under Terrorism legislation are now expected in Trafalgar Square on 11 April, when Defend Our Juries’ next silent vigil is planned.

As the letter highlights, the only basis for these arrests is a law which the High Court has ruled to be unlawful. Hodge, Jones & Allen is seeking urgent assurances from the Met that participants in the “Lift the Ban” campaign will not be arrested while the legal position remains unresolved.

A spokesperson for Defend Our Juries said:

The Met has lost the plot. The ‘Lift the Ban’ campaign against the unlawful proscription of Palestine Action was vindicated by the High Court, and yet they’re still going to arrest us on terrorism charges for peaceful protest even now.

Rather than admit that the arrest of a woman under the Terrorism Act on 15 March breached their own policy, they have now changed the policy to try to make it fit retrospectively. That’s just embarrassing.

The Met will now waste even more public resources on arresting hundreds more people for terrorism charges on the basis of a proscription order which the High Court has already ruled unlawful.

How can they believe that’s proportionate or in the public interest? Nothing has changed since they said on 13 February that stopping arrests was “the most proportionate approach we can take.

Advertisement

The deputy assistant commissioner stated that they needed to give ‘clear guidance’ to their officers. Nothing says ‘clear guidance’ like regularly changing your mind over the unlawful arrests of thousands of peaceful protesters holding paper signs.

Featured image via M Lyman / Defend Our Juries

The British military trained nearly 2000 overseas troops in its defence academies between 2017 and 2025. That figure includes personnel from 108 countries. Shockingly, fourteen of those countries are on the UK’s own human rights watchlist.

The British-based Action on Armed Violence (AOAV) reported on 24 March 2026 that the UK considers those states to have:

significant issues relating to democracy, governance or civil liberties.

Yet the UK still trained them anyway…

The so-called International Defence Training (IDT) programme is meant to:

promote professionalism and improve standards among partner forces.

AOAV said they fear the courses risk:

 strengthening security forces accused of abuses.

British military teaching dictatorships

The countries include Democratic Republic of Congo, Somalia, and Uzbekistan. AOAV also said there were obvious gaps in the figures. For example:

Israel does not appear in the dataset, despite the MoD previously confirming that a “limited number” of Israeli personnel have been trained in the UK. No explanation is given for the omission.

AOAV said the IDT permits:

foreign military personnel to attend courses at UK institutions including the Royal Military Academy Sandhurst and the Defence Academy in Shrivenham.

Training ranges from basic officer instruction to specialist and postgraduate courses. The government says the programme helps build long-term relationships and encourages adherence to international norms.

Advertisement

Adding:

An MoD spokesperson has previously said that all training is “carefully assessed” and aligned with UK values.

Real risk of violations

Dr Iain Overton, Executive Director of AOAV, said:

There is a real risk that UK training may end up enhancing the capabilities of forces that go on to commit violations.

In September 2025 Declassified UK revealed the UK was still training Israeli soldiers at the Royal College of Defence Studies (RCDS) two years into the genocide:

The soldiers trained at RCDS include Colonel Yaniv Asor, the current chief of the Israel Defence Forces (IDF) Southern Command who oversees military operations in Gaza.

Asor was recently accused by the head of the Israeli air force of responsibility for mass civilian casualties in Gaza.

Advertisement

Charlie Herbert, a retired British army general, told Declassified at the time:

That it has taken so long to bar IDF officers from the prestigious Royal College of Defence Studies is a disgrace.

Even now, it is not sufficient to ban them from 2026. Instead all IDF personnel currently studying or training at UK military establishments should be expelled immediately.

The British government is speaking out of both sides of its mouth again. Its proclaimed commitment to human rights and a mythical ‘rules-based international order’ have been sorely exposed by support for Israeli genocide in Gaza and an illegal US attack on Iran. The fact the UK is still training authoritarian regimes alongside all this should shock precisely nobody.

Featured image via the Canary

Staff and fans of Ipswich Town football club have complained bitterly at an unannounced stunt to promote racist far-right Trump fan Nigel Farage. Farage published a promotional video for his politics filmed as he stood on the Portman Road pitch. The club then had insisted it is “apolitical” and denied “formally” inviting Farage to visit the club, but details that have emerged since refute the denial, showing that:

👉An associate of CEO Mark Ashton sent an invite to Nigel Farage
👉Farage was met by Marcus Nash, director of media and communications
👉Ashton and COO Luke Werhun had lunch with Farage
👉The club gifted Farage SIX ‘Farage 10’ shirts
👉 Employees outside a select few were unaware of the stunt
👉Members of staff have made complaints

This is despite the club claiming they were ‘apolitical’ in a statement made on Wednesday.

Farage’s lunch was provided free – the latest in a long line of freebies provided to the racist bigot by wealthy and often foreign donors. He also failed to declare more than £380,000 in outside earnings within the legally-required timeframe.

Nigel Farage’s visit to Ipswich Town’s Portman Road stadium has prompted a significant social media backlash.

Ipswich insist Reform UK and Farage were not formally invited by the club … but The Athletic has been told a slightly different story.

Advertisement

📝 @Dan_Sheldon_

Free to read… pic.twitter.com/ojBbQQRmH4

— The Athletic | Football (@TheAthleticFC) March 24, 2026

Club staff have complained and fans groups have expressed their outrage on social media. Supporters’ group Blue Action accused bosses of letting the club they love be:

egregiously exploited by a political figure for personal gain and those in charge seemingly allowing and even welcoming it … risk[ing] alienating large numbers of the fanbase and fomenting division.

Featured image via the Canary

The Starmer government has opened a “terrifying” ‘consultation’ on its plan to remove the need for medical training for classification as qualified by the General Medical Council (GMC).

The GMC, until recently, exclusively regulated doctors – those with full medical qualifications. The Starmer-Streeting axis has already – with the collusion of the GMC – started to erode that distinction by allowing the GMC to regulate ‘medical associates’ – people with far less training than an actual doctor.

A number of people have already died after misdiagnosis or wrong treatment by ‘associates’ they believed were doctors. The government knows using these roles to fill medical positions is extremely dangerous – and have been told the same repeatedly by doctors and academics.

Starmer making things much worse

But now, the government is going further. It has opened a ‘consultation‘ on:

the draft General Medical Council Order 2026, which would reform how the General Medical Council (GMC) regulates medical practitioners, physician associates and anaesthesia associates across the UK.

So far, so bland. But it’s not. As Doctors Association co-chair Dr Matt Kneale explains in a thread on X, it means allowing the GMC to “remove the guardrails” separating actual doctors from other people presenting in white coats in medical settings:

2/ Currently, under s34L of the Medical Act 1983, a CCT can only be awarded to a registered medical practitioner who has completed an approved specialist or GP training programme. This is one of the statutory foundations of the specialist register.

— Dr Matt Kneale (🦋drmk.link) (@mattster) March 26, 2026

4/ Article 26 governs GMC approval of education and training. It applies to all “regulated professionals” – which under this Order includes physician assistants (PAs) and physician assistants in anaesthesia (PAAs), not just doctors.

— Dr Matt Kneale (🦋drmk.link) (@mattster) March 26, 2026

6/ On top of this, the draft Order abolishes the specialist register as a distinct statutory entity. Under the new framework, GMC maintains a single register with separate parts for doctors, PAs and PAAs.

The statutory guardrails that limited CCTs to doctors are being removed.

Advertisement

— Dr Matt Kneale (🦋drmk.link) (@mattster) March 26, 2026

This then means the GMC can extend ‘CCTs’, until now only available to fully-trained doctors, to ‘associates’ with a fraction of the training. This is self-evidently dangerous – and all of us need to act now:

6/ On top of this, the draft Order abolishes the specialist register as a distinct statutory entity. Under the new framework, GMC maintains a single register with separate parts for doctors, PAs and PAAs.

The statutory guardrails that limited CCTs to doctors are being removed.

— Dr Matt Kneale (🦋drmk.link) (@mattster) March 26, 2026

Advertisement

10/ Eroding its statutory exclusivity to doctors would be a seismic change.

The consultation closes 23rd June 2026. Every doctor – and every patient who cares about who holds a CCT – should respond.

— Dr Matt Kneale (🦋drmk.link) (@mattster) March 26, 2026

Intervention needed

As one clinician said this morning:

EVERYONE (whether doctors or not) must contribute to this ‘consultation’

It states that the GMC will be able to decide whether a PERSON (not ‘a doctor’) can be put onto the Specialist Register. Not just PAs, I assume, but also ACPs, presumably having been assessed by other PAs or ACPs.

Advertisement

Also, the GMC wants to continue to appeal against tribunal decisions not to sanction/strike off doctors for things like protesting against genocide.

This organisation needs a total boycott and is certainly not fit for purpose in any way.

The Doctors Association will be submitting its own direct response. But everyone who cares about the NHS, or even just about their own safety and health, needs to do the same.

Featured image via the Canary

We hope you love the products we recommend! All of them were independently selected by our editors. Just so you know, HuffPost UK may collect a share of sales or other compensation from the links on this page if you decide to shop from them. Oh, and FYI — prices are accurate and items in stock as of time of publication.

It might be spring, but the clouds are still winning their battle with the sun for top spot in the UK. So while it’s peak gardening season, cajoling yourself to get outside is not the most appealing of tasks.

Just like any dreaded task (think: hoovering, laundry, or taking the bins out), bringing a new tool or accessory into the mix could be just what you need to have you Julie Andrews-style leaping around your garden.

Whether you’re undergoing a complete garden makeover, or simply sprucing it up with some fresh shoots, what you use (and wear) can make the difference between a hard days’ work and cosying up inside.

So if you need a little push to get outside before the weather perks up, here’s everything you need for gardening inspo this (so far un-)sunny season.

The government’s ‘Rycroft Review’ report on foreign interference in UK politics has been confirmed as a sham immediately it was published, after it failed to mention Israel a single time. And this is only what Skwawkbox and others predicted, since Starmer minister Steve Reed is a die-hard ‘friend of genocide’ who also didn’t mention Israel once when commissioning it in December 2025.

Israel: those who will not be named

Russia gets seven mentions. Israel – so far ahead of other countries in terms of interference in UK politics that it’s (literally) out of sight – none at all. And Reed is ‘under fire’ for – oops – ‘forgetting’ to disclose just how tight he is with the Israel lobby. Or mention it at all. Just like he ‘forgot’ the massive donations he’s accepted from the Israel lobby:

NEW: A Labour minister is under fire after failing to declare his relationship with the pro-Israel lobby when he unveiled a report on foreign interference in the UK

Steve Reed failed to declare his affiliation with the influential Labour Friends of Israel group pic.twitter.com/nJGIUm6sFh

— Laura Webster (@LauraEWebsterr) March 26, 2026

Advertisement

In fact, its very absence from the report is as clear a demonstration as could be of the extent of its influence. The National describes Reed’s omission as “incredible”, but in the literal sense it’s the absolute opposite: totally believable and unsurprising. Just appalling.

The scale of the farce becomes even clearer when China and Iran get a special mention – just as Israel is looking to drag the UK into its illegal war on Iran. A section titled “How serious is the problem?” of “long-term strategic foreign interference” quotes a government briefing naming those two countries as the crux of the problem:

The UK is a target of long-term strategic foreign interference and espionage from elements of the Russian, Chinese and Iranian states which, in different ways, seek to further their economic and strategic interests and cause harm to our democratic institutions”.

But not Israel. Noooo. No no no no no. Who even is Israel?’, the uninformed reader might ask.

Beep boop

So, a minister superglued to the Israel lobby – which terrifies British politicians and broadcasters alike and believes it is entitled to demand special consideration at every turn – commissions a report that conspicuously omits, completely, any mention of the biggest foreign interferer in UK (and US) politics.

“This is not the droid you’re looking for. Move along, move along.”

Nothing to see here. Obvs.

Featured image via the Canary