Data, tactics and small-screen fame

“I did a quick calculation,” says James Yorke, director of football at StatsBomb, one of the sport’s leading data suppliers and analytics companies.

“After about 25 yards, the expected goal value of a shot is about 0.03, so roughly one in 33 goes in. From 20 yards, that doubles, but is still only 0.06.

“Even from 12 yards – you think, ‘oh, penalty spot, that is a good chance’ – but the likelihood of scoring is still one in six.

“You have to be in the six-yard box before you are even talking about 50:50 coin flips.

“It sounds crazy – your intuition is that goals are more likely than they actually are. For any shot, everyone overestimates the likelihood of it going in.

“But there is a fundamental truth that getting closer in changes something that is highly infrequent into something that is, relatively, much more frequent.

“It doesn’t get exponentially more likely, but the curve is step.”

What Yorke is describing – an expected goals model – is one of the most basic building blocks in football analytics.

But less than a decade ago, using cold numbers to assess shooting opportunities, rather than relying on gut feeling and optimism, was revolutionary.

“Around 2012 up to 2015, expected goals models became prevalent, understood and known more widely,” says Yorke.

“You would be crazy as a coach not to incorporate what those models are telling you into what you are telling players.”

So, did data change tactics? Did coaches see in the spreadsheet that long-range goals carve themselves into our memories, but, over the season, attempting to repeat them dents their chance of victory?

There is a precedent.

In basketball, where successful long-range shots are worth three points rather than two, analytics have conversely fuelled a switch to teams taking on more attempts from distance.

But even the biggest brains in football data aren’t convinced their industry is the cause of the trend.

Speaking at the MIT Sloan Sports Analytics conference in March, Sarah Rudd – who pioneered the use of advanced statistics in football when she was brought in by Arsenal in 2012 – was asked how and why things had changed on the pitch.

“Data is forcing people to be a little more intentional in how they analyse things,” she said.

“So people now ask ‘if I shoot from outside the box what are the consequences?’”

But she also pointed out that long before mathematical models arrived the best teams tended to focus on taking higher-quality shots, closer in.

One of Rudd’s first projects at the Emirates was to assess whether, as per a common criticism of late-era Arsene Wenger, his Arsenal team were attempting to “walk it in”.

“What I found was that they were, but so were all the other good teams in the Premier League,” she said.

The numbers only confirmed the wisdom in what the best were already doing.

Alongside Rudd on the panel was Ian Graham, who, until 2023, held a similar role behind the scenes at Liverpool.

Rather than data affecting tactics, he sees the opposite: a sea-change in tactical approaches affecting the data.

“I think a decrease in shooting distance is a consequence in a change in playing style,” he said.

“Compared to 10 years ago when there was a lot of long-ball football and attempts from outside the area, teams are playing in a much more similar style to that brought in by Pep Guardiola and Jurgen Klopp.

“I think it is just a happy accident that it looks analytics related.”

High-line defences being pressed hard and fast by the opposition mean, when chances do come in today’s game, attackers have either a closer sight of goal or a clear run to it.

No longer are they feeding on knock-downs and snap-shots as deep-lying backlines keep them at arm’s length.

But Taylor’s thought process at Fratton Park in December 2006 wasn’t so complex.

As a loose ball flew up out of a contest between Nwankwo Kanu and Simon Davies, he didn’t think about high-value shots or low defensive blocks, opportunity cost or half spaces.

Instead, Taylor just noticed it sat up lovely.

Now a manager, he thinks today’s generation of players have more on their minds.

“If you sat down players from December 2006 and now, they would be two different groups of people,” he says.

“There has always been pressure internally – from your coach, team-mates and the fans in the stadium –  but there is a lot more pressure externally now.

“After a match a player will shower, do their media bits, then turn their phone on and they might have 50,000 messages where they have been tagged on Twitter or Instagram.

“That is where young players – young people in general – get a lot of their information and feedback from. And all humans like praise and dislike stick.

“If you take a shot from 25 yards, it goes over and you get that criticism, the next time that chance arises you are probably going to be thinking in the back of your head, ‘if I miss again, I might get the same response’.

“Does that affect people and shape their decision-making? Of course it does, it has to.”

In November, Sky Sports’ data editor Adam Smith noticed a statistical quirk that might reinforce Taylor’s theory, that what players consume via their screens affects what they produce on the pitch.

The release of Netflix’s docuseries charting David Beckham’s career – the first episode of which zeroed in on his famous long-range goal against Wimbledon in 1996 – coincided with a four-fold increase in shots from 30 yards and beyond in the Premier League.

A few weeks later, attempts from distance seemed to fall back to their previous level.

Social media was barely born in December 2006. Podcast analysis and YouTube watch-alongs didn’t exist. Television showed fewer games and highlights were harder to find.

Social contagion spread in a more personal way.

In today’s Premier League, competing systems and processes grind a way to a result. The players are cogs in the machine.

The noughties though, was a time of alpha ball-strikers. Greatness came more often via a single act from a single actor. A bolt from the blue – or 25 yards plus – formed team’s figureheads.

The top scorers of Premier League goals from outside the box maps the era’s biggest names and rivalries: Frank Lampard of Chelsea, Steven Gerrard of Liverpool, David Beckham of Manchester United, and Thierry Henry of Arsenal.

When the ball dropped to any of them 25 yards out, was their instinct, untamed by multi-outlet criticism, to try and outshine the stars elsewhere?

While most prolific and readily associated with wonderstrikes, those names aren’t the best long-range shooters. Or, at least, not the most efficient.

Since Stats Perform started collecting the data in 2003-04, the most successful player in converting outside-of-the-box shots into goals in the Premier League is Matheus Pereira, the Brazilian who spent two seasons with West Brom between 2019 and 2021 before heading to Saudi Arabia.

Interestingly, Manchester City – known for their highly structured, intricate attack aimed at getting round the back of defences – are well represented among the most efficient long-range artists, with Bernardo Silva, Phil Foden and Sergio Aguero all in the top five.

The whole list skews more recent, suggesting current players are more picky about their chances from distance, shooting less frequently, but more successfully.

There is a silent partner in every screamer of course.

A glut of long-range goals in this summer’s European Championship turned attention on the ball, with suggestions that something about Adidas’ creation – which contained sugar cane and wood pulp – favoured strikers more than goalkeepers.

At the 2010 World Cup an above-average number of long-range goals coincided with goalkeepers claiming Adidas’ Jabulani ball had an unpredictable trajectory.

The 2006-07 and 2007-08 seasons – the two campaigns in Premier League history with the highest share of long-range goals – were both played with the Nike Total 90 Aerow II.

It was the first time that Nike had stopped mentioning the ball being “faster” in their promotional material, believing the quality had to be “inherent”. Perhaps they should have done.

Six of the 10 players in that 1992 American team would go on to be inducted into the World Golf Hall of Fame – Betsy King, Beth Daniel, Patty Sheehan, Pat Bradley, Juli Inkster and Meg Mallon. Their players boasted 21 major titles between them, to just two on the European side – Laura Davies and Liselotte Neumann.

The US were red-and-white-hot favourites.

But they lost captain Kathy Whitworth, winner of an LPGA record 88 tournaments, who returned home on the day they arrived at Dalmahoy, following the death of her mother.

Whitworth had been inspirational in leading the US team to the first victory at Lake Nona, Florida in 1990 by pairing “personalities rather than anything directly related to golf”, according to Dottie Mochrie (formerly Pepper).

And then major winner Daniel stirred the pot, while talking to a US golf magazine. “You could put any one of us on the European side and make it better, but the only Europeans who could help us are Laura Davies and Liselotte Neumann,” she was reported as saying.

Sporting history is littered with such statements that only serve to fuel the underdogs, and while Daniel disputes she made those comments, Walker recalls it differently: “She said it.

“And, of course, what she said was absolutely right, but when somebody tells you you can’t do something, or that they’re better than you, you think ‘I’ll show you’.

“It wasn’t nice for us to hear and it made us want to beat them even more.”

Daniel was made to chew over her words on the first morning.

England’s Davies had won just one of her four major titles by 1992, but was well on her way to becoming one of the best in the world. She won all three of her matches at Dalmahoy, including the opening foursomes where she teamed up with Alison Nicholas to beat Betsy King – and Daniel, of course.

Davies and Nicholas then defeated Sheehan and Inkster on day two as Europe opened a one-point lead to take into Sunday’s singles. Davies again led the team out, winning the top match against Brandie Burton to set the platform as Europe dominated the final day 7-3 for the unlikeliest 11½-6½ triumph.

“It was Laura’s best performance playing for Europe – she was unbeatable and just brilliant, a natural leader,” remembers Walker.

The weather also played its part.

“It was October in Scotland and horrendous,” says Walker.

“It was wet, it rained, the course was waterlogged and if it had been a regular tournament we wouldn’t have played.

“It was miserable, but we were used to those conditions. The Americans absolutely hated it. They didn’t really do horrendous conditions and that played into our favour.”

In fact, it took until Loch Lomond in 2000, again in typical autumnal Scottish weather, for the Europeans to triumph for a second time.

Mixed Martial Arts is not for the faint-hearted, irrespective of whether you are fighting or watching.

Any UFC fighter worth their salt has been on the receiving end of a hefty blow or two – even Conor McGregor.

But what are the best-known knockouts? And who delivered them? 

Here’s the top 20 in UFC history – decided by UFC itself.

Warning: the following video contains scenes viewers may find disturbing:

So, why does Glasgow think it is an event still worth having?

Firstly, they believe the numbers add up. Glasgow’s calculations are that a combination of CGF funds, a financial sweetener from Victoria and private investment will avoid the use of any UK public money.

The 2026 Games programme will also be slimmed down to lighten the load on the bottom line.

The plan is to stage as few as 10 sports, compared to the 18-strong schedule in 2014, and to use existing venues rather than build from scratch.

The way Birmingham projected a feel-good face onto England’s second city shows the success the Games can be.

However, the city’s subsequent financial struggles, with its council effectively declaring bankruptcy in September 2023, also underlines the stakes involved.

Clare Hartley is the co-founder of Arc Event Consultancy and has worked with multi-sport event organisers, including Manchester 2006 and Birmingham 2022, for nearly 25 years,

“It is just very hard to put these multi-sport events on,” she says.

“They are very expensive, they require a lot of different venues and logistically they are very challenging.

“Multi-sport events are huge projects that take up so much money and time and more countries and cities are weighing up more carefully whether it is worth hosting them.”

The sporting calendar is far busier than it was in 1930, when the first Commonwealth Games took place, offering star athletes lucrative alternatives but also giving potential hosts the chance to put on events that better suit local tastes and budgets.

The Commonwealth Games – which has necessary infrastructure and a variety of venues comparable to an Olympics, without the bumper broadcasting receipts or global sponsorship deals to offset them – will always be a tricky proposition.

“You look at Singapore,” says Hartley.

“It is a sporting nation, part of the Commonwealth, a prosperous nation, and they are hosting the World Aquatics Championships next year, rather than bidding for the Commonwealths.

“There are so many sporting opportunities out there, nations can pick and choose a little bit and the Commonwealth Games has not been of as much interest.”

The Ultimate Fighting Championship, also known as UFC, has become one of the fastest-growing sports in the US and in the last few years increasingly caught the attention of fight fans in the UK, too.

But what is it, how was it formed and what are the rules?

Here’s our guide on what you need to know.

What is UFC?

The Ultimate Fighting Championship is a mixed-martial arts promotion in which a series of fights take place around the world, also known as fight nights. It calls itself the “premier organisation in MMA”.

Mixed martial arts, of course, is nothing new dating back more than 5,000 years.

But UFC brings together some of the world’s best mixed martial artists, fighting each other at different weights with a main event taking place once a month. There are more than 40 events each year.