Lando Norris believes that Max Verstappen knows “deep down” that he was in the wrong during the Mexican Grand Prix, and that the three-time Formula 1 champion should know what to change in future.

Verstappen collected two 10-second penalties for a pair of 10th-lap incidents with Norris in Mexico, one for running Norris out of road at Turn 4 and another for leaving the track at Turn 7 and gaining an advantage by passing the McLaren driver.

In the aftermath, Norris reiterated his respect for Verstappen but was dismayed by the championship leader’s approach during the race – having noted that his only job was to stop his rival from outscoring him in races.

Norris said that he still hadn’t spoken to Verstappen about the race, and that it was not up to him to encourage the Dutchman to change his ways.

“We’ve not spoken and I don’t think we need to,” Norris said. “I’ve got nothing to say. 

“I still have a lot of respect for Max and everything he does – not respect for what he did last weekend, but respect for him as a person, and also what he’s achieved. 

“But it’s not for me to speak to him. I’m not his teacher, I’m not his mentor or anything like that.

“Max knows what he has to do. He knows that he did wrong, deep down he does. And it’s for him to change, not for me.”

Max Verstappen, Red Bull Racing RB20, Lando Norris, McLaren MCL38

Photo by: Red Bull Content Pool

He added: “Max is probably one of the most capable drivers on the grid, if not the most. He knows what he can and can’t do and where the limits are. So, he knows the changes he has to make.”

Norris explained that he was not going to change his approach when it came to racing Verstappen, and felt that he was good at keeping his nose clean during contentious moments on track.

He admitted that he might have “paid the price” for lacking aggression in certain scenarios, but that the points from keeping it clean in races have nonetheless added up.

“I think something I’ve done well in my whole career is staying out of trouble and keep the car in one piece. All those little things add up over a championship and over a season, especially in a cost cap season as well,” Norris contended.

“I’ve always had the mentality to want to race fair and clean. I think I probably said it last weekend, I’ve been maybe too kind, whether I was attacking or defending. But I think I’ve always made good decisions from that side. 

“Sometimes I’ve paid the price for not being aggressive enough, but the rest of it is not up to me. Even when you don’t realise it, there are times when you have to avoid a potential crash and maybe you don’t see it on the TV.

“There are more times that people realise that you go through those certain scenarios.  And I think those are some of the challenges we have every now and then. 

“But I’ll come into this weekend with a new expectation of hopefully having clean, fair racing. And I think that’s what we should expect.”

Max Verstappen says he “has the wrong passport” for the Formula 1 paddock amid fierce criticism over his driving tactics in last week’s Mexican Grand Prix.

In Mexico City, Verstappen was handed a double 10-second penalty for two incidents in which he forced McLaren title rival Lando Norris off the track, which caused unease from various colleagues over his aggressive driving style in the title run-in.

Verstappen particularly copped heavy criticism from British pundits, with former F1 world champion and Sky analyst Damon Hill wondering if the three-time champion is even capable of racing fairly.

Meanwhile, Johnny Herbert, who was the FIA driver steward in Mexico, suggested Verstappen drove Norris off on purpose in Turn 7 to ensure Ferrari’s Charles Leclerc would make it past, hindering Norris’ title bid by reducing the number of points left on the table for the Briton.

Verstappen initially shrugged off Hill’s comments in the Brazilian Grand Prix’s FIA press conference, but speaking later on to Dutch-language journalists, he was amused by how he seemed to have the wrong nationality to be treated fairly by the media and the stewards.

“I know what most people are like, it’s nothing new,” he said. “Last year was perfect, so it must have hurt a lot for many people that they couldn’t say anything negative.

“Now they’ve got the chance to say something, so they’re all coming out of the woodwork. At the end of the day, I’ve got the wrong passport for this paddock.”

Max Verstappen, Red Bull Racing

Photo by: Sam Bloxham / Motorsport Images

Advertisement

Verstappen called Herbert’s theory “a pretty extreme accusation” and insisted he didn’t drive Norris off on purpose in Turn 8.

“I didn’t do anything on purpose. They can’t look inside my head,” he said. “It’s a pretty extreme accusation. We just raced hard.”

While questioning the size of the penalty for his Turn 4 incident with Norris, Verstappen did acknowledge the second 10-second penalty for his Turn 8 manoeuvre was fair. But he didn’t feel there was any reason to do things differently from now on.

“You win some, you lose some,” he said about the outcome of his Turn 8 lunge. “It depends. Every situation is different and in hindsight, it’s always easy to have another look at it.

“It happened, we just have to make sure we have a more competitive car so we don’t end up in that situation again, because that’s where it starts.”

What is also behind Verstappen’s suggestion of bias is his community service penalty for swearing in Baku’s press conference, while Leclerc hasn’t been slapped on the wrists yet for a similar offence in Mexico.

“[Herbert] had big opinions about what I said in the press conference [in Baku], but I didn’t hear him after the press conference in Mexico.

“Actually, what [Leclerc] said is worse than what I said in its context, and it was a much more important press conference with more people watching. But you know, I’m not going to spend time on that. It is what it is.”

Motorsport.com understands the FIA is still considering whether or not Leclerc’s swearing in Mexico’s post-race press conference needs to be investigated further, with a call expected over the Brazilian GP weekend.

George Russell believes the current Mercedes Formula 1 car is the “most inconsistent” the team has ever had, as it continues experiments on its upgrade package in Brazil.

With Russell and Lewis Hamilton having both endured crashes with the latest version of the W15 since the United States Grand Prix, Mercedes is trying to get to the bottom of why there seems to be some quirkiness with its handling.

Both Mercedes drivers are committed to running with the latest floor in Brazil, which features some minor revisions compared to what Hamilton had in Mexico as the team works on improving its stability.

It is understood that there will also be minor differences between the versions that both drivers use in first practice to further help the team get a better understanding of what it needs.

While Mercedes has had some good times with its car this season, winning three out of four races before the summer break, Russell said there remains a lot of confusion over the fact that it does not seem to offer a predictable platform.

“I think in 2022, in the sort of porpoising era, without doubt that was far more unpleasant,” said Russell, reflecting on Mercedes’ progress during the recent ground effect era.

George Russell, Mercedes F1 W15

Photo by: Andy Hone / Motorsport Images

“But because of the nature of those cars, it was far harder to get close to the limit because you’re literally jumping around every single corner, and you knew that it was going to bite you.

“The problem we’ve got with this car at the moment is you think it’s not going to bite you, and you can achieve a really great lap. And then suddenly nothing changes, or you feel nothing changes, and the following lap you lose all of that performance.

“So without a doubt this is probably the most inconsistent our performance has been as a team in probably forever.”

Russell explained that the differences in floors, with the Briton getting his new version back on the car after it was repaired following his Austin qualifying crash, across the two cars were very small.

“We’re both going to be on the updated floor,” he said. “We’ve got a small difference in specification as a bit of a trial, but it’s not an update as such. It’s just in the realms of normal aerodynamical testing.”

Track surface impact

One critical factor to Mercedes’ hopes this weekend will be how much the new Interlagos track surface impacts the heat of the tyres.

Circuit detail

Photo by: Steven Tee / Motorsport Images

The team’s car is known to be very sensitive to track temperatures, and the hotter it gets the worse its performance can be.

With early predictions pointing to the newly-resurfaced dark asphalt being hotter than it was before, Russell thinks it is an element that Mercedes needs to be mindful of.

“The colour of the tarmac has an impact, so the darker the colour, the hotter the temperature,” he said.

“On the flip side, it’s a very smooth surface, so the tyres will be able to probably run hotter and be penalised less because it’s so smooth. That’s the theory.

“But we don’t know if it’s going to be good for us or bad for us. Austin was the best example: Friday qualifying, we’re both fighting for pole. Saturday qualifying, Lewis is out in Q1, I end up in the wall and nothing has changed.”

George Russell reckons it is time the FIA has full-time employed, professional race stewards to improve consistency and help drivers interpret the guidelines.

It comes after explosive races at the US GP in Austin and especially the Mexican Grand Prix, where Max Verstappen was issued with two 10-second time penalties.

Verstappen was penalised for forcing title rival Lando Norris wide at Turn 4 and leaving the track and gaining an advantage at Turn 7 in Mexico City.

The world champion contested both decisions while, ahead of this weekend’s Brazil Grand Prix, Norris said he felt that “deep down” Verstappen knew the manoeuvre was wrong.

It has reopened the interpretations of F1’s loosely-worded rulebook and Russell, who is a director of the Grand Prix Drivers’ Association, says that while he does not believe the rulebook needs ripping up, it does now require a stable body of race officials to improve the consistency of the penalties being dished out.

Russell said: “On a personal view, not a view of the collective, I don’t think it [the rulebook] needs ripping up at all. It just needs some fine adjustments or a small addition. It’s all pretty clear.

“The guidelines need to be in place but it also needs to be remembered they are guidelines. There’s not a written regulation and it’s down to the stewards to take the best judgement.

“When things come down to interpretation, and when things are about consistency, you can argue if you were to have the same stewards week in, week out, the consistency will be better because they’re interpreting things in the same manner and the drivers understand exactly what they expect in a given circumstance.

Max Verstappen, Red Bull Racing RB20, Lando Norris, McLaren MCL38

Photo by: Steven Tee / Motorsport Images

“So I do feel, again a personal view, not one of on behalf of the drivers, but personal view, I do think we’re at a point now in this sport that we do need a full-time professional steward in where they earn a real salary.

“They’re not effectively volunteers and I do think within the pool of stewards we’ve got now, they are definitely up to standard. So it’s not saying anything bad about the current stewards, it’s just saying I feel we should be having system stewarding a week in, week out.”

The FIA wishes to speak to drivers about the racing rules to provide clearer guidelines in the future. However, Verstappen – who has made several references to falling out of love with F1 – says the series has become over-regulated.

Speaking in Sao Paulo ahead of the race, he said: “It’s never going to be perfect because even if you remove rules, then you get into a battle, then you want more rules because it’s not clear what is allowed or not.

“Then when you have too many rules, you want less rules. It just keeps on going left and right all the time. Do I think it’s over-regulated? Probably yes. I mean, in general, the rulebook is only getting bigger and bigger every single year, I don’t think that’s always the right way forward.”

Russell however says that along with professional stewards, the guidelines do need further clarification but they only become highlighted when the wording is tested.

He added: “If you read the rules, there are lines that say if you’re driving erratically or dangerous, you’ll be punished and you can argue if a driver outbreaks himself and doesn’t make the corner on the exit that is erratic because you’re driving off the racetrack. 

“So there is an element of interpretation there, for sure it does need to be cleaned up a little bit.

“At the end of the day, every incident is different. For sure, now things are evolving… it’s like the safety of the cars, you need a bad accident to happen before you make this real progress.

“It’s the same with the driving regulations. You need something or decisions to be incorrect or things to be pushed beyond its limit before you realise change needs to happen.”

Formula E organisers have cancelled the upcoming pre-season test in Valencia following torrential flooding in the area which has left at least 158 people dead and will instead hold the event in Jarama.

The all-electric championship was due to hold four days of running for all 11 teams and the new Gen3 Evo machines between 4-7 November at the Ricardo Tormo Circuit.

But the Valencia region in eastern Spain was hit by a year’s worth of rainfall in the space of just eight hours on Tuesday, causing widespread devastation that has killed well over 100 people with many still missing.

The access roads in and out of the circuit have been completely swept away in the flash flooding, with Formula E organisers announcing on Wednesday that it was inaccessible by vehicle.

Although the Ricardo Tormo Circuit itself was undamaged, problems gaining access to the site as well as the wider logistical problems in the area have meant Formula E has cancelled the test.

Circuit Ricardo Tormo after flooding

Photo by: Paco Alcobendas

“We have all been monitoring the tragic situation in Valencia, where flash floods have devastated the region and claimed many lives,” said a Formula E statement released on Thursday.

“Our thoughts are with everyone affected by these terrible events and we at Formula E are looking at how we can practically support the region during this awful time.

“Following consultation with local authorities, the FIA and our colleagues at Circuit Ricardo Tormo, we have decided not to proceed with our pre-season test in Valencia, planned for 4-7 November.

“While it may have been possible to go ahead logistically, it is important not to create any distraction or use valuable resources that are much better served supporting the local community.

“We have a number of Formula E team members who have been working on the ground in Valencia over the past week, and we want to personally thank them for everything they’ve done, and continue to do, to support the area.”

The statement went on to add that a new venue in the form of the Circuito del Jarama would host the scheduled event – as well as the all-female test – which will run from 5-8 November.

It added: “The full event schedule will be confirmed in due course, as we navigate a number of logistical and operational challenges which will determine if it’s possible to move our test operations to Madrid within this timeframe.”

The Ricardo Tormo Circuit is currently due to host the conclusion of the 2024 MotoGP season the following week on 15-17 November, with organisers stating on Wednesday that the championship is “committed” to running the race but that its focus is on supporting those in the community.

Ahead of the Malaysian Grand Prix this weekend, Marc Marquez claimed that “ethically speaking, I don’t think the Valencia Grand Prix should be held”, adding that it should only take place if all the proceeds are given to the families of victims.

Most recently, the 2023 Emilia Romagna Grand Prix was cancelled by Formula 1 organisers after flooding in the area that resulted in two deaths.

Max Verstappen says he doesn’t listen to criticism about his Formula 1 racing conduct at the Mexican Grand Prix, asserting that “I know what I’m doing”.

The Red Bull driver faced numerous questions in the aftermath of the Mexico race, in which he was penalised twice for incidents involving title rival Lando Norris – ultimately adding up to a 20-second drop at his first pitstop.

Verstappen was accused of “Dick Dastardly stuff” by 1996 F1 champion Damon Hill on the Sky Sports F1 podcast, Hill adding that the Dutchman had “let himself down” with his Mexico manoeuvres.

Asked if had any response to Hill’s comments, Verstappen tersely responded: “I don’t listen to those individuals. I just do my thing. I’m a three-time world champion, I think I know what I’m doing. I have my opinions, but I don’t need to share them.”

Explaining the situation from his perspective, Verstappen stated that it was simply a ‘win some, lose some’ incident and that he was simply attempting to ensure he kept hold of a good result.

“I think it’s just you win some, you lose some. That’s how it is in racing in general,” he said.

“I like to win. I don’t like to lose. I think not many people like to lose. I just tried to maximize the result and, like I said, some you win, some you lose.”

Max Verstappen, Red Bull Racing RB20

Photo by: Andy Hone / Motorsport Images

Speaking on the subject of those whom he was willing to take advice from, Verstappen said that he had no problems with objectivity and people in the paddock who were not simply willing to stir things up.

He also elaborated on his feeling about the current racing rules situation, reiterating his standpoint that it was probably overregulated and that there would never be the perfect quantity of rules governing drivers’ etiquette on track.

“I think it’s not that straightforward, clearly even between how many seconds [of time penalties] that you get. Like I said before, sometimes they work for you, sometimes they work against you.  

“I think it’s never going to be perfect because even if you remove rules, then you get into a battle, then you want more rules because it’s not clear what is allowed or not. Then when you have too many rules, you want less rules. It just keeps on going left and right all the time. 

“Do I think it’s overregulated? Probably yes. In general, the rulebook is only getting bigger and bigger every single year. I don’t think that’s always the right way forward. 

“[I listen to] people that are objective and close to me and not just there to stir [things up]. Some people are just being very annoying. I know who these people are, although I don’t really pay a lot of attention to them anyway. 

“I think I’ve got to this stage in my career with the right people supporting me and making my own decisions.

“[These are] good people with a good heart from the outside. The most important thing is that I know [who they are]. Some people are just a bit biased and I mean, I get it, it’s fine.

“But it’s not my problem at the end of the day. I just continue with my life and I keep performing.”