Liam Lawson says thinking about auditioning for a Red Bull seat in 2025 is “very far” from his focus, which is simply on meeting the performance criteria set by RB on his Formula 1 return.

The New Zealander will return to an F1 seat in Austin after Daniel Ricciardo was let go by RB following the Singapore Grand Prix, with Red Bull seeking to assess his performance versus Yuki Tsunoda as it considers its driver options for the future.

Lawson was touted as a potential replacement for Sergio Perez earlier this year, although Red Bull decided to put its faith in Perez lifting himself out of a mid-season slump.

Asked if there were any indications from Red Bull over what Lawson needed to do to put himself in the frame for a Red Bull drive, potentially as early as 2025, he replied that he was only focused on the performance targets he had been set.

“I mean, I think [that thinking about a Red Bull drive is] very far ahead, honestly,” Lawson said. “The target or the goal that’s been set out is the same as it’s always been since I was 17 and joined the program.

“It’s all performance-based, and that’s basically how they’ll be looking at it. Obviously, Yuki’s done a very good job the last couple of years, and especially this year.

“He’s the benchmark for them to compare me against; he’s the only one in the same car as me. So I’ll be directly compared with him.

“I guess the goal or the expectation from them is for me to compete alongside him. In terms of where that sets me out for next year or in the future, I have absolutely no idea. But that’s the target that’s been set out.”

Liam Lawson, Reserve Driver, Visa Cash App RB F1 Team

Photo by: Alastair Staley / Motorsport Images

Lawson said that there were no specific points targets set out that he needed to achieve, but he felt that he needed to break into the top 10 quickly to help RB cement its claim for sixth in the constructors’ championship.

He added that the nature of the Austin F1 sprint weekend was a “difficult” way to return, given his lack of experience on the circuit and the limited practice running available to him.

“[The break has been about] just preparing as much as possible; it’s a difficult time to come into the season, obviously with a sprint weekend this weekend, new track, end of the season, so I’m just trying to be as ready as possible.

“I think it’s not as simple as a position or like ‘this is where I want to be’. I think it’s scoring points mainly for myself, because what the team’s going to judge me on is how I perform, and the best way to do that is score points.

“And also for the team, fighting for P6 in the championship as well. I’ll basically be trying to get to the points as soon as possible, for me that’s the goal.”

Max Verstappen is poised to continue his ongoing row with the FIA after he was punished for swearing.

The Formula 1 world champion was hit with a community service sanction at the Singapore Grand Prix after he used foul language in a live televised press conference.

The Red Bull driver responded to the penalty by holding his own impromptu press briefings in the paddock in Singapore after giving short answers during the FIA press conferences, which is he requested to attend.

Verstappen said he had yet to receive the full details of his punishment but he would continue to hold his own media round tables where he would continue to speak his mind.

Speaking at the United States Grand Prix in Austin, he said: “I have not heard anything [from the FIA], so for me it doesn’t really change anything.”

When asked to clarify what he meant and whether he would do his own media, away from the FIA, he added: “With the situation. I mean, I also have to talk less, so it is fine for me.”

Verstappen’s stance has received the backing of the Grand Prix Drivers’ Association, with George Russell saying the organisation is hoping to have a hearing with the FIA next week to discuss the incident.

Verstappen also said he would be open to discuss the matter with FIA President Mohammed Ben Sulayem – and would be waiting for his call.

He added: “At the end of the day, everyone has their own opinion, but it is quite clear that, like I said already it was silly stuff.

Mohammed Ben Sulayem, President, FIA, with Max Verstappen, Red Bull Racing

Photo by: Zak Mauger / Motorsport Images

“I am always open for a chat [with Ben Sulayem], but from my side at the moment it is not that I am the one who has to reach out with this stuff. I just live my life and continue, nothing changes.”

When asked if the FIA had made something from nothing, Verstappen said: “Yeah, but that is in general the world in which we live in, right? A lot of stuff is like that.

“This particular scenario, I think it is very unnecessary. Of course I know you can’t swear but that is more related to insults and then you see comments from people saying they don’t want kids seeing that.

“Well, when I was five years old, I never watched a press conference in my life anyway. At school, you say way worse things than that, that’s just how life is.

“If you want to set an example, yeah, sure, but I don’t think you should make a big deal of it. I just want to live my life, and if I don’t agree with something I will say it. That’s it.”

Max Verstappen and Sergio Perez have denied the adjustable front bib ride height device at the centre of a technical storm engulfing Red Bull at Austin has ever added Formula 1 car performance.

On Thursday at the United States Grand Prix, Red Bull admitted it was the team involved in discussions with the FIA over a clampdown on such a system – following the governing body being alerted to its existence at the previous round in Singapore.

It has been suggested that this device had a range of settings that could be adjusted – most likely by a mechanic at specific times – to help alter the car ride height.

While using such a system is normal, it would be illegal if this action was performed once parc ferme conditions began after qualifying and until the start of a race (including sprints).

A Red Bull representative said: “Yes, it exists although it is inaccessible once the car is fully assembled and ready to run.

“In the numerous correspondence we have with the FIA, this part came up and we have agreed a plan going forward.”

Red Bull’s drivers then faced the media in the paddock at the Circuit of the Americas, with Perez speaking first.

Sergio Perez, Red Bull Racing RB20

Photo by: Lionel Ng / Motorsport Images

Advertisement

When asked by Motorsport.com how the team had reacted to the saga, Perez claimed: “There has been nothing that we were doing. We never actually talked about it. It was impossible.

“If anything, for example, I remember here that last year it was a sprint event, so we ended up with the ride height [close to] the moon.

“It was completely out of it because we were concerned about something like what happened to Mercedes [and Ferrari, being disqualified for excessive underfloor plank wear] that could happen to us.”

Pressed on whether he and Verstappen knew the controversial part existed, Perez replied: “I knew it existed but it was not available to us [to be used].”

Regarding the implication that such a device – if used under parc ferme conditions – would be performance-enhancing and if they expected any impact on performance, both Red Bull drivers denied this.

Max Verstappen, Red Bull Racing, Sergio Perez, Red Bull Racing

Photo by: Red Bull Content Pool

Verstappen claimed when he first saw the initial story about the device being discussed with the FIA, he believed it actually involved another team.

“It is open source, right?” he said of the parts whose design has to be submitted to the FIA so competitors are aware.

“Everyone can see it. For us it was just an easy tool when the parts were off. It was to adjust, but once the whole car is built together you cannot touch it. So for us it doesn’t change.

“When I read it [the story], I was thinking about other teams doing it and then I found out it was related to our team, and we never even mentioned it in the briefing.”

The saga over the Red Bull system comes hot on the heels of technical intrigue surrounding the team’s main rival McLaren, which has made changes to its rear wing following controversy over a ‘mini-DRS’ concept.

Perez said that ultimately it was down to the FIA to decide if what teams were doing was allowed or not.

“I think it is down to the FIA to draw a line whether it is legal or illegal,” he explained. “They are the ones who control the sport, so at the end of the day it is up to them to decide.”

Brodie Kostecki has provided details on just how sick he was on the way to taking his first Bathurst 1000 win last weekend.

Speaking on Supercars’ Drivers Only podcast, Kostecki said: “Well, I had the shits with myself, but I literally had the shits that day.

“Physically, I was feeling horrible to the point where I was on the shred. It was not good. I wasn’t feeling good on Friday.

“On the Friday, I was just minimal laps trying to stay fresh for qualifying. But yeah, I was getting a bit of double vision and all that sort of stuff going on. Bit feverish.

“I was glad to actually just put it in the Shootout, to be honest.”

Such were Kostecki’s issues that co-driver Todd Hazelwood was wary about sharing the car in the race with an unwell teammate, joking: “We did joke on Saturday, like, we’re going to have to put a garbage bag in the seat.

“Like, ‘I don’t want to be sitting in that’.”

Brodie Kostecki, Erebus Motorsport Chevrolet Camaro ZL1

Photo by: Edge Photographics

Under the circumstances, the flat-out 30-lap sprint to the end of the race with Triple Eight’s Broc Feeney barely a second behind him – all the while managing a tight fuel window – was even more impressive.

“Those last 30 laps there were gruelling, they were so intense,” Kostecki said.

“It was within a second for a lot of, you know, for over 50 percent of that last stint. And I’ve got a display on my dash that shows me how far Broc was behind me.

“I’d be going down the hill every lap, pretty much hanging my balls out on the line, ready to write this Chiko roll off and roll through the sand.”

The 26-year-old has two rounds remaining until the end of the season, after which he will move to Dick Johnson Racing to race a Ford Mustang in 2025.

The feel-good stories and underdogs are gone — eliminated through the first two rounds. Even Alex Bowman, who went from being the fourth driver at HMS to one of the strongest playoff drivers, has now been eliminated after an unfortunate DQ. Half of the eight remaining title contenders are former Cup champions. In fact, every champ from the last four seasons is still in the fight, and all four Championship 4 drivers from last year remain as well. There are no weak links, which should make for a thrilling and dramatic Round of 8 as four of them will see their title hopes shatter into pieces while the other four move on to Phoenix.

Sitting atop the standings is Kyle Larson, the clear championship favorite. He has more wins, more top-fives, and more laps led than anyone else this season. There’s really not more to say about him beyond the fact that he is ‘the guy’ until one of the other prove otherwise, but there’s plenty that could.

Kyle Larson, Hendrick Motorsports, HendrickCars.com Chevrolet Camaro

Photo by: Rusty Jarrett / NKP / Motorsport Images

For example, his Hendrick Motorsports teammate Chase Elliott. NASCAR’s Most Popular Driver and the 2020 series champion only has one win this year, but he leads the entire pack in best average finish (11.7). He has been nothing if not consistent, ever-present in the front-half of the field and likely to make some noise in the races ahead. After a dismal 2023 where a broken leg derailed his entire year, he has carefully made his way through the mayhem and unpredictability of this year’s championship without ever truly feeling the pressure of being eliminated. He even entered the Round of 12 cut-off race on the bubble, but he was never really part of that tense storyline as he quickly scored a mountain of stage points. 

Chase Elliott, Hendrick Motorsports, Kelley Blue Book Chevrolet Camaro

Photo by: Nigel Kinrade / NKP / Motorsport Images

The only two-time Cup champion in the Round of 8 is a bit of surprise, considering the fact that he was out at the checkered flag last weekend. Bowman’s disqualification nearly three hours later paved the way for his playoff re-entry. Joey Logano, who won the title in 2018 and 2022, is one of just two drivers to win multiple titles under this volatile playoff format. Team Penske is also looking for its third straight Cup title in the Next Gen era, but despite Logano’s resume, he has actually underperformed compared to recent seasons. Despite this, he has shown the ability to step it up when the moment demands it, and that’s nothing new for Logano. Likely the most aggressive driver still in the title fight, he has won at all four tracks that end the 2024 season.

Joey Logano, Team Penske, Shell Pennzoil Ford Mustang

Photo by: Nigel Kinrade / NKP / Motorsport Images

Then there’s his Penske teammate and reigning champion Ryan Blaney. Despite scoring just one point at Watkins Glen in the Round of 16 and crashing out heavily at Talladega to finish a season-worst of 39th, he remains in contention. Like Logano, he knows how to step it up when the pressure is on. In every other playoff race, he’s scored anywhere between 33 and 53 points per race. No driver has ever won back-to-back championships in this knockout format, but the the feisty driver of the No. 12 just might.

Ryan Blaney, Team Penske, Discount Tire Ford Mustang

Photo by: John Harrelson / NKP / Motorsport Images

So, half of the remaining title combatants have already won championships, including the last four from 2020 – 2023. They are here for a reason, but the challengers who have yet to hoist the Bill France Cup are just as competitive.

For example, there’s Denny Hamlin, despite a somewhat rocky playoff run so far. He’s also got a lot going on right now with a contentious lawsuit against NASCAR involving the team he co-owns, but as a driver, he is the most successful to ever race that has yet to win a Cup title. Three Daytona 500 victories, 54 Cup wins, and five consecutive seasons finishing fifth or higher in the final standings. He has never missed the playoffs since this format was introduced in 2014, and he is perhaps the hungriest driver here. We’ve seen him wall his good friend Larson for wins, we’ve seen him get into physical altercations with Logano (more than once), and he thrives off of fans’ shower of boos every time he wins. This is the exact sort of driver you want going into this round, which is more a battlefield than a stock car race. He will do whatever it takes to smash through that glass ceiling and become a champion.

Denny Hamlin, Joe Gibbs Racing, FedEx One Rate Toyota Camry

Photo by: Nigel Kinrade / NKP / Motorsport Images

Advertisement

And what about the third Hendrick driver to advance? William Byron started the year by winning three of the first eight races, including the Daytona 500. However, we haven’t seen him in Victory Lane since April. But the driver of the No. 24 appears to be finding his footing just in time for the final stretch. He scored three straight podium finishes in the Round of 12, scoring so many points that he didn’t even need to win in order to lock himself into this round early. It would be foolish to count him out.

William Byron, Hendrick Motorsports, Valvoline Chevrolet Camaro

Photo by: John Harrelson / NKP / Motorsport Images

Tyler Reddick is perhaps the most interesting driver on this list. 23XI Racing has never made it beyond the Round of 8, and neither has Reddick. Of course, there’s also that lawsuit hanging over them. Reddick drove like a champion at Roval, using fresh tires to cut through the field in closing laps, erasing the double-digit points deficit and narrowly escaping elimination. Some might be quick to disregard him but we should remember that this driver won the regular season championship. He has heavily relied on those bonus points through what has been a rough playoffs, but this is a driver who just showed the world that he can extract everything and then some out of the car when his back is against the wall. After that late charge at the Roval, he’s already proven to be championship material.

Tyler Reddick, 23XI Racing, Monster Energy Toyota Camry Justin Haley, Spire Motorsports, Mattress Warehouse Chevrolet Camaro Chase Elliott, Hendrick Motorsports, UniFirst Chevrolet Camaro Joey Logano, Team Penske, Shell Pennzoil Ford Mustang

Photo by: Danny Hansen / NKP / Motorsport Images

Advertisement

So that’s it for thi — wait, aren’t we missing someone? Oh right … Christopher Bell! As he himself will tell you, everyone always overlooks the driver of the No. 20 Joe Gibbs Racing Toyota. And there is really no good reason for it. He is quiet and makes little noise on the track, but he is always a contender. Bell is the only driver to have made the Championship 4 in both years of the Next Gen era. He has also finished seventh or higher in seven of the last eight races — the only result worse than that was 14th. He is consistent, ever-present and a very legitimate title threat. Before the playoffs, this writer picked him to win it all for all the reasons we just covered. He is NASCAR’s ‘silent assassin.’ People always wonder where Bell came from when the big prize is in sight, but he’s always been right there, but nobody — including his rivals — seem to realize that until it’s too late.

Christopher Bell, Joe Gibbs Racing, DEWALT Toyota Camry

Photo by: Nigel Kinrade / NKP / Motorsport Images

McLaren’s Oscar Piastri says if any team has been using a device to alter its front bib height under parc ferme conditions then it is a clear breach of Formula 1 rules, as focus centres on Red Bull.

The build-up to the United States Grand Prix has been dominated by intrigue over a part that Red Bull has admitted to having on its car that can adjust the clearance of its T-tray.

While the component itself is not illegal, as all teams have way of adjusting their front bib height, suspicions have emerged that Red Bull could have used it under parc ferme conditions – which would be illegal.

This has been denied by the team, and the FIA has also made clear that it has no evidence of any competitors having employed such a system outside of the regulations.

But speaking ahead of what is an ultra-close fight between McLaren and Red Bull for the F1 titles, Piastri has emphasised his belief that such an exploit would not be a case of a squad exploring a grey area of the rules.

“We’re obviously pushing the boundaries of the technical regulations,” he said. “Everyone is, and that’s what makes F1, F1.

“But from what I’ve heard and been told, something like this is not pushing the boundaries: it’s clearly breaking them.

Lando Norris, McLaren MCL38, Max Verstappen, Red Bull Racing RB20

Photo by: Mark Sutton / Motorsport Images

Advertisement

“I haven’t heard which car it’s on, or if it’s on any car, and obviously there’s the reports of it. But if it is something that’s being used, it’s clearly not been pushing the boundaries. It’s been out of the grey area and into a black area.”

Piastri said that questions would have to be asked about McLaren’s rival if there was a noticeable swing in its performance compared to recent races, just as the Woking-based team was put under the spotlight recently over its mini-DRS rear wing.

“If there’s a big difference in performance, then clearly there’ll be some questions,” he said. “If it’s not…well, you don’t know.

“Our mini-DRS was legal. Even though we’ve had to make some changes, it’s not revolutionary for the car. We’ll see if it makes any impact.”

Lando Norris did not think that the FIA clampdown on policing the matter would trigger a dramatic drop in Red Bull’s pace, but he reckoned it could make a difference.

“It’s one thing having it on your car, it’s another thing on how much you exploit it and use it, which we have no idea on,” he said.

“If it has been helping them, if they’ve been utilising it in the way people think they have, then maybe it will shift in our direction.

Lando Norris, McLaren MCL38

Photo by: Lionel Ng / Motorsport Images

Advertisement

“But, when you talk about things like that, they’re not going to have got several pole positions or wins just because of such a device.

“I don’t think it really will change anything in the scheme of things, but when we look at maybe certain qualifyings and we look at the gap in certain races this year, when it’s been split by hundreds of a second in qualifying or even thousandths, then you might say, ‘okay, well, maybe this has helped in that direction or this direction’.”

He added: “I think it’s good that the FIA are doing such a thing. There’s a difference between black and white stuff like this and there’s a difference between Formula 1 and pushing the boundaries and creating new things, and innovating within the space that you’re allowed to innovate.

“I think that’s what we as McLaren have done a very good job in, but we’re sure not to go any further than that.”