Connect with us

Motorsports

What’s next for 23XI, Front Row on and off the track in lawsuit over charter deal

Published

on


Advertisement

Expansion is never easy, but 23XI Racing and Front Row Motorsports might have found a new way to make it difficult.

Both organizations say their plans for 2025 haven’t changed to increase from two-car teams to three-car operations amid their filing of an antitrust lawsuit against NASCAR. Front Row agreed in May to purchase a charter from Stewart-Haas Racing and 23XI Racing agreed Aug. 7 to purchase a charter as well from SHR, according to the lawsuit. The transfer of the charter has to be approved by NASCAR.

Neither 23XI nor Front Row have signed the new NASCAR charter agreement that is set to begin in 2025 while the remaining NASCAR Cup teams (including SHR) have signed that agreement. Front Row and 23XI filed the lawsuit Wednesday against NASCAR and Chairman Jim France in federal court in North Carolina.

It will make for an uncomfortable time for both organizations and NASCAR on and off the track.

Advertisement

On the track, the teams say they will go ahead with their plans, even if they lose their request for an injunction to keep their chartered (guaranteed spot) status in 2025 while the litigation continues. Presumably, that would include the approval of the transfer of the charter from SHR to their organization.

A chartered team earns about three times more money — possibly more depending on performance — during a season than an unchartered team.

“23X1 plans to race next year,” 23XI co-owner Curtis Polk said. “We plan to continue to go through with all the things that we were planning before this lawsuit.

“Our business model is going to move forward, and we were going to continue to grow and compete at the highest level.”

Advertisement

FRM owner Bob Jenkins said the same.

“We made a commitment to our teams and staffing people and preparing for 2025,” Jenkins said. “So we’re full speed ahead either way.”

Polk, a longtime associate of Michael Jordan, said they invested in the team with Denny Hamlin because they want to race. Jordan has a long history in the sport, with his father working on race cars in North Carolina, and he has been to several races since the team first fielded a car in 2021.

“When Denny approached Michael and myself about starting 23X1, we did it for the love of the sport,” Polk said. “We did it for [driver] Bubba [Wallace], for giving him a platform where he could compete at the highest level in the sport.

Advertisement

“We didn’t have a racing company or racing team. All the investment that we’ve made is to go Cup racing. We don’t race anywhere else. We don’t plan on racing anywhere else. This is what we built this team for.”

Their lawyer, Jeffrey Kessler, said legal ramifications should keep the teams from feeling any retribution on the competition side as far as inspections and on-track rulings.

“I spent my career where we’re representing plaintiffs who have to continue to do business with or be employed by the people we’re suing,” Kessler said. “And I will tell you that usually on the other side, there will be counsel who will caution the other side to not take retribution, to not treat the parties suing unfairly, because if that were to happen, it will be immediately addressed.

“As you can imagine, it’s not a great place for a defendant to be, so in most of my cases, we don’t see any of that type of behavior, and I don’t think we’ll see it here. If it came, we’d be ready for it.”

Advertisement

Off the track, that request for a preliminary injunction would be the first matter taken up by the federal court in Charlotte. NASCAR would have the option to just agree to that provision — unlikely but possible considering that it would have a mess on its hands if it sells those charters to another entity and then 23XI and FRM win the lawsuit.

NASCAR most likely will file a motion to dismiss, where the judge would determine that even if everything 23XI and FRM claim to be true is true it doesn’t violate the law.

If the teams prevail in that instance, then each side would ask the other for information and have the opportunity to depose witnesses and executives. 

“We will be able to obtain financials,” Kessler said. “We will be able to follow the money. We will be able to see exactly how exploitative this system has been and how much injury it’s inflicted on the teams and the drivers.

Advertisement

“Because when the teams have no money, that also directly kills the drivers. The teams are the ones who compensate the drivers. It is a direct attack on both. And the last time I spoke to a NASCAR fan, the reason they love this sport is about the teams and the drivers.”

Sam Cherry, an attorney who represented Speedway Motorsports shareholder Francis Ferko in an antitrust case against NASCAR filed in 2002, told FOX Sports on Wednesday he believed 23XI and Front Row have enough in the complaint to withstand a motion to dismiss.

“NASCAR is a very, very tough litigator, but that’s not uncommon, especially when the core business itself depended upon prevailing on the antitrust complaint that we had filed,” Cherry said. “Many of the pundits were calling me and asking me, ‘Aren’t you afraid that you’re going to kill the goose that’s laying the golden egg?’ I said, ‘Perhaps but they’ve got a bigger fear than we do, and our people were risk takers.”

The same could be said about 23XI and FRM. By hiring Kessler, who has represented athletes in a variety of sports and is best known for his work in getting college athletes paid for their name, image and likeness, 23XI and FRM bring with them someone experienced to what possibly could be a lengthy legal fight.

“Our clients are in this to the end — what that’s going to be is going to depend on what the courts rule and allow,” Kessler said. “But they are going to do their best to keep competing as long as they can. And we expect that to add to the legal victory or the settlement that transforms this sport.”

Advertisement

Obviously, Kessler expresses confidence in the case but NASCAR prevailed in its most recent antitrust challenge about 20 years ago when the owners of Kentucky Speedway sued NASCAR. The track owners lost that case and then dropped the appeal after selling the track to track operator Speedway Motorsports.

Speedway Motorsports had already agreed not to sue NASCAR over antitrust issues as part of the 2004 settlement reached in the Ferko case, which never went to trial as SMI bought Rockingham Speedway and moved one of its dates to Texas Motor Speedway.

Antitrust litigation relies on defining a market and the noncompetitive behavior that impacts the consumer. The teams’ lawsuit defines the market as premier stock-car racing teams in the United States.

It claims that a premier stock-car racing series requires premier stock-car racing teams to have a premier racing series product. It claims that NASCAR owning the series, the majority of the tracks, its agreements that prohibit any Cup track from hosting other major stock-car events, and its control of the supply chain for the Next Gen car’s parts and pieces have created a restraint in trade because the premier stock-car racing teams cannot compete anywhere else.

Advertisement

“[The charter agreement] did not provide a fair split of revenues so that the teams would have a chance to earn a reasonable return on their investment,” the teams said in their lawsuit. “It seized control over team intellectual property rights, to be used for NASCAR’s benefit.

“It did not provide permanent charters so that the teams could realize value through permanent charter appreciation. It did not give teams the ability to resist unilateral NASCAR rules that increased team costs. And it did not give the teams any meaningful role in the governance of the sport. It also imposed terms that would undermine the relationship between teams and drivers.”

Former NASCAR team owner Chris Lencheski, Chairman and CEO of Phoenicia and co-founder and CEO of SKI Partners, who advises private equity companies on NASCAR investments and is an adjunct professor in the masters program at Columbia University, says an important factor is that NASCAR is a business enterprise and not a sports league.

He is skeptical on whether they can prevail considering that 32 of the 36 charters have been signed for by other team owners.

Advertisement

“I’m still trying to square how any one individual organization among a business enterprise suggests that this was unfair to them, uniquely, and not unfair to the other 32,” Lencheski said. “If 32 organizations stand up and say, ‘We all agree,’ then you might have some merit because there might be something unknown to me as a consumer I may not be aware of.”

Teams arguing they are the injured party could be a tough sell as other sports league cases primarily focus on the athletes or fans as the consumers. The charter agreement isn’t raising prices for fans nor limiting the ability of people in a market to watch racing, although the teams would likely argue that strong teams are needed to have a quality product. 

“The race consumer … is the person I’m focused on,” Lencheski said. “All of this other stuff is millionaires versus millionaires style of discourse.

“It’s about how does it affect the race consumer? And nothing in the activity, in my eyes, by either NASCAR or Jim France affects the race consumer’s ability to enjoy the sport, engage in the sport meaningfully, or address the sponsors’ needs that would have been outside of one charter versus another.”

Advertisement

Kessler said the teams filed the suit as a last resort, that they didn’t feel NASCAR has provided them with a way to get a return in their investment in the sport, with the tipping point being the new charter agreement that most teams signed to start in 2025.

 “[These two team owners] wished that they never had to come to this moment,” Kessler said. “They wanted NASCAR to be a good partner. They wanted to find a way to restructure this voluntarily so teams could actually have a fair chance to get a return of their investment and invest in this sport.

 “NASCAR was not willing to engage in that type of discussion, so instead, we filed.”

Bob Pockrass covers NASCAR for FOX Sports. He has spent decades covering motorsports, including over 30 Daytona 500s, with stints at ESPN, Sporting News, NASCAR Scene magazine and The (Daytona Beach) News-Journal. Follow him on Twitter @bobpockrass.

Advertisement


Get more from NASCAR Cup Series Follow your favorites to get information about games, news and more






Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Motorsports

Andrés Pérez talks making ARCA history on NASCAR Daily

Published

on

Continue reading with advertising …

… or with a subscription

Visit motorsport.com as usual with advertising and tracking. You can revoke your consent at any time via the data protection page.1

Use motorsport.com without any advertising banners, personalized tracking and commercials for a small fee.

Advertisement

Accept and continue

Advertisement

Subscribe for $1.50

More information about advertising and tracking in our Data protection notice, the List of our partners and in Data protection information center.

Already a subscriber?

Log in here

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Motorsports

Supercars champion Kostecki claims Bathurst 1000 pole

Published

on

Brodie Kostecki has stunned the Supercars paddock with a dazzling Shootout lap to take pole position for Sunday’s Bathurst 1000.

The reigning Supercars Champion put a troubled season on the back burner to set the fastest qualifying lap of the weekend, his Erebus Motorsport Chevrolet Camaro lapping the 6.2km track in 2m05.5119s.

“I wasn’t sure I was going to get it, it was not my best lap around here all weekend,” said Kostecki, who will share his car with Todd Hazelwood.

“I had a bad tyre vibration, I was starting to get double vision at one point. I wasn’t feeling very well yesterday and I actually watched the [earlier] co-drivers’ session from the house.”

Advertisement

Cameron Waters looked to have Kostecki’s measure when he was the second-last man out but the Tickford Racing Ford looked to lose a little speed in the third and final sector, and will line up second in the car he will share with James Moffat.

“I really wanted that but Brodie’s lap was awesome,” said Waters. “We are in the mix and the front row is pretty good. I have been focusing pretty hard on the race car and it feels good.”

Broc Feeney, who missed out on provisional pole position in Friday’s qualifying session because of a late red flag, finished the session in third place, sharing the Triple Eight Chevrolet with Jamie Whincup.

Richie Stanaway delivered a brilliant  performance to seal fourth. As the first man out in the single-lap session the 32-year-old New Zealander set a benchmark time of 2m05.9286s in his Ford before returning to the Grove Racing garage to watch as the next five drivers tried but failed to match his time.

Advertisement

Stanaway, who does not have a confirmed Supercars seat for 2025, had a wild moment at the first corner but stormed over the rest of the first sector.

After setting the fastest time in Friday qualifying Stanaway’s team-mate Matt Payne dropped to seventh in the shootout after touching the wall at the exit of Forrest’s Elbow.

Points leader Will Brown will start from fifth on the grid for Triple Eight ahead of Erebus’ Jack Le Brocq, whose Chevrolet touched the wall on the way up the hill.

Anton De Pasquale gave the hard-working Dick Johnson Racing Ford team some comfort with the eighth fastest time, while Chaz Mostert will be right behind him in the Walkinshaw Andretti United Ford.

Advertisement

Tenth place went to Andre Heimgartner who, in his first-ever Bathurst shootout, ran wide at the first corner, losing about eight seconds. He will share the Brad Jones Racing Chevrolet with Declan Fraser.

The Supercars will return to the hallowed Bathurst track at 8:15am, Australian Eastern Daylight Savings time, before the start of the 161-lap classic, set for 11:30am.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Motorsports

NASCAR’s Elton Sawyer explains the Damaged Vehicle Policy after Talladega’s ‘Big One’

Published

on

Continue reading with advertising …

… or with a subscription

Visit motorsport.com as usual with advertising and tracking. You can revoke your consent at any time via the data protection page.1

Use motorsport.com without any advertising banners, personalized tracking and commercials for a small fee.

Advertisement

Accept and continue

Advertisement

Subscribe for $1.50

More information about advertising and tracking in our Data protection notice, the List of our partners and in Data protection information center.

Already a subscriber?

Log in here

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Motorsports

Denny Hamlin speaks on frustration after finishing eighth at Kansas | NASCAR on FOX

Published

on

Video Details

Denny Hamlin said he had a car to win the race but the issues on pit road kept him from challenging. He obviously was frustrated after the eighth-place finish:

SEPTEMBER 30・NASCAR Cup Series・0:53

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Motorsports

Red Bull’s RB21 will be an ‘evolution’, team explains wind tunnel limitations

Published

on

Red Bull is planning an evolution of its current RB20 car for 2025, believing that investing in a bold revamp is not worth it.

With the Milton Keynes-based squad locked in a tight championship fight with McLaren, it is mindful that, if it does not make solid gains this winter, it could risk an even more difficult campaign next year.

However, a combination of cost cap limits, plus the need to ramp up efforts for the new rules revolution coming in 2026 when Red Bull will run its own engine, has prompted it to step away from doing anything radical.

Speaking about how the squad was dealing with the different requirements of now, next year and 2026, team boss Christian Horner said: “In this business, you’re always juggling and you’ve got to put one foot in front of the other.

Advertisement

“You can’t project too far into the future. Long term in F1 is about two and a half months and, basically, what we learn this year is relevant to next year.

“So next year’s car will be an evolution of this year’s car. I mean, there’s many components of last year’s car that have been carried over into this year, because with the way the cost cap works, unless there’s significant performance upgrade, it doesn’t make sense [to change].”

Max Verstappen, Red Bull Racing RB20

Max Verstappen, Red Bull Racing RB20

Photo by: Simon Galloway / Motorsport Images

Engine challenge

Red Bull’s decision to not overstretch itself with car changes for next year comes as it ramps up to run its first F1 engine from the start of 2026.

Advertisement

It has invested heavily in its new Red Bull Powertrains division, which it is convinced will bring it gains despite the huge costs.

“It is by far our biggest challenge,” added Horner. “We’ve created a start-up business, aggressively recruited 600 people into it, built a factory, put in the process and brought a group of people together to work within a Red Bull culture that has been so successful on the chassis side.

“Of course, many have come from other teams, competitors and suppliers in F1, and that’s a massive undertaking to get 600 people and all your processes, your supply chain, everything geared up to deliver for two teams in ’26.

“We also have the benefit of a great partner in Ford Motor Company and that relationship is working very well. But inevitably there will be short-term pain, but there is a long-term gain of having everything under one roof with engineers.

Advertisement

“We’ve already seen the benefit and the difference of having chassis and engine engineers sitting essentially next to each other as we start to integrate the ‘26 engine into the ‘26 car.”

Red Bull Ford Powertrains

Red Bull Ford Powertrains

Photo by: Red Bull Content Pool

Wind tunnel factor

As Red Bull has dug deep into the factors that have hurt the progress of its current RB20, problems with wind tunnel correlation have been exposed.

It comes with the team still operating from the same Bedford facility that it has used since it entered F1 in 2005.

Advertisement

While work has begun on a new state-of-the-art facility at its Milton Keynes factory, that is unlikely to be up and running before 2026.

Horner insisted that Red Bull was always mindful that, while it has upgraded Bedford over the years, it is not as technically advanced as more modern facilities.

“We’ve always known the limitations of the tunnel,” he said. “But I think as we’ve really started to push the aerodynamics of these cars now and you’re into really fine margins, then the limitations show themselves up.”

He added that committing to invest in its new wind tunnel was only possible once it became clear that the idea of outlawing teams from using such facilities had been abandoned.

Advertisement

“There was a point in time that wind tunnels could have been banned,” he said.

“There was a discussion about whether that was going to be the case, and whether CFD would overtake it or not.

“Adrian [Newey] held off pushing for a new tunnel until there was clarity on that. But it got to a point where Aston Martin wanted a new tunnel and the FIA changed their stance.

“So it was a question of: ‘Look, we have to do this, and we have to do this now, because the regulations dictate that, within a cost cap, the tunnel that we’re running is grossly inefficient.’”

Advertisement

Asked what the challenges Red Bull faced with its Bedford tunnel were, Horner said:“We’ve got a facility that is a 60-year-old wind tunnel. It is a relic of the Cold War.

“It’s been good enough to produce some fantastic cars for us over the years. But it has its limitations.

“So anything under five degrees [centigrade], we can’t run it. Anything over 25 degrees, it becomes pretty unstable.”

Read Also:
Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Motorsports

World results

Published

on

Villa keeper D'Angelo denied equaliser from Hampton

Motor racing updates from around the world, including the United States.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 WordupNews.com