THIS is the ‘crazy dangerous’ moment a jockey threw his own safety aside to comfort a superstar horse after it collapsed mid-race.

Rider Jason Collett has earned worldwide praise for his quick thinking after Think About It fell to the ground with a ‘bleeding attack’ last weekend.

5

5

Advertisement

5

5

5

Connections feared the worst for the six-year-old gelding – who has won almost £6.5million in prize money – after he flipped spectacularly during the running of the Group 3 Sydney Stakes at Randwick.

THE SUN RACING MEMBERS ENCLOSURE

The only place to get Templegate’s tips first – and at the best prices – is by joining Sun Racing’s brilliant Members Enclosure.

Sign up now for just £1* to be part of racing’s best winning team and get…

• Four free racing tickets, four times a year – worth £300
• Templegate’s daily tips at the BEST prices before anyone else
• Tomorrow’s copy of The Favourite at 9pm today
• Exclusive insights from Andrew Balding and Hayley Turner
• VIP competitions from Racing Breaks each month
• New customer offer with Coral

Become a member today for just £1*

*For the first month then £3 per month thereafter.

SIGN UP NOW

Advertisement

18+ Ts and Cs apply. First month membership £1, then £3 per month unless you cancel at least 7 days before your next billing date. For more information contact help@thesun.co.uk

But after being unseated Collett rushed over to the horse’s side and appeared to gently soothe his head before the on-course vets could arrive.

Incredibly his touch must have worked as Think About It made a miraculous recovery there and then.

He was was able to get to his feet and walk back to the stables amid cheers from the crowd – who initially feared the worst after he collapsed in a heap rounding the home bend.

The horse’s trainer Joseph Pride said: “I have seen horses come down like that before, and they don’t get back up, unfortunately.

“Once they put that screen up, they’re not coming out.

“I saw his head pop up above the screen. It was amazing. I just thought, ‘Ah, what a relief’.

“I don’t believe in any higher powers but honestly, something happened there.

“I don’t know what happened. There is a scientific explanation there but it is beyond me. He shouldn’t have got up.”

Once examined by vets the decision was made to retire Think About It immediately.

A Racing New South Wales post confirmed what had gone wrong. It read: “Think About It, which collapsed in Race 6 due to a bleeding attack, has recovered and is under veterinary care.

“Jason Collett was uninjured in the incident.”

Collett was labelled ‘amazing’ for his heroic act.

One punter who posted the clip wrote: “Graphic footage and love to hear Think About It will be living life like a king from here on out in retirement.

“But huge respect for Jason Collett in a crazy dangerous situation, trying to comfort the horse without any hesitation #Amazing.”

Another wrote: “Jason Collett – you are a quality human, mate. Respect.”

While even those completely unfamiliar with him were left in awe.

One person said: “Oh my goodness. Never heard of Jason Collett before but what a legend and the horse survived? Wow.”

The jockey himself said: “I’m OK and amazingly the horse has walked back to the stalls.

“They don’t do that. I thought he’d broken down but he’s bled out.”

Collett revealed his first instinct was not to ensure his own wellbeing but to check on the horse.

Speaking the morning after the incident, he said: “I am so happy to see him this morning.

“I can’t even believe he doesn’t even seem to be sore from the tumble. He rolled over and at speed, they’re going about 40mph.

“I’m OK and amazingly the horse has walked back to the stalls.”

FREE BETS – GET THE BEST SIGN UP DEALS AND RACING OFFERS

Commercial content notice: Taking one of the offers featured in this article may result in a payment to The Sun. You should be aware brands pay fees to appear in the highest placements on the page. 18+. T&Cs apply. gambleaware.org.

Remember to gamble responsibly

A responsible gambler is someone who:

• Establishes time and monetary limits before playing
• Only gambles with money they can afford to lose
• Never chases their losses
• Doesn’t gamble if they’re upset, angry or depressed
• Gamcare – www.gamcare.org.uk
• Gamble Aware – www.gambleaware.org

Find our detailed guide on responsible gambling practices here.

The ADAC has unveiled a brand new logo for the DTM as part of a revamped brand identity for the championship.

Designed in cooperation with sports branding agency UnitedSenses in Munich, the new logo was showcased to the public for the first time at last weekend’s Hockenheim finale and will come into effect immediately.

The new design features the yellow and black colours of the German automobile club ADAC, which bought the DTM from its previous owner the ITR at the end of 2022.

After the purchase, the ADAC implemented an updated version of the logo originally introduced by the ITR, but has given it another overhaul at the conclusion of the series’ 40th season.

In a statement, the ADAC said the logo will be accompanied by a “new broadcast and digital identity, and various design solutions for printed products and events will achieve a consistent branding for all brand experiences in the DTM.”

The ADAC also announced that the DTM will switch to 100 per cent synthetic and fossil-free fuel from 2025.

Start action

Photo by: Alexander Trienitz

Produced by P1 Fuels company and certified by the FIA, the switch to synthetically-made petrol will help the series cut down its carbon emissions by 75%.

P1 Fuels is already involved in motorsport and has experience supplying fully sustainable fuel to the World Rally Championship.

“We are now taking a significant step in the further development of the series and are strengthening the DTM’s role as a pioneer in the field of sustainability in motorsport,” said ADAC Motorsport Director Thomas Voss.

“We are bringing greater sustainability to the DTM platform with a new, synthetic and climate-friendly fuel. In doing so, we are demonstrating the potential of synthetic fuels within one of the most popular racing series in Europe.

“We are also presenting the series with a dynamic look; a new brand image will give us a modern branding.”

Factory Lamborghini driver Mirko Bortolotti was crowned the 2024 DTM champion after he finished second to Luca Engstler in Sunday’s final race at Hockenheim.

The next DTM season, the 41st in the championship’s history, will begin at Oschersleben on 26-27 April.

The spotlight will once again be on Leach, off-spinner Bashir and possibly leg-spinner Rehan Ahmed as a third frontline slow bowler in the England XI for the third Test.

After England won a record-breaking first Test in Multan, Pakistan recycled the same pitch at the same venue and levelled the series in the second Test, with home spinners Noman Ali and Sajid Khan sharing all 20 wickets.

Pakistan captain Shan Masood said he wanted another turning pitch in Rawalpindi and pictures on social media emerged on Sunday of attempts to dry the surface with industrial-sized fans, heaters and windbreaks.

On Monday, the heaters and windbreaks had been removed, though the fans remained.

England are yet to train in Rawalpindi and will get their first look at the pitch on Tuesday.

“I don’t know what to expect,” said Leach, who has 140 wickets from his 38 Tests.

“I haven’t seen anything. We’ll go to training tomorrow, have a look at it. I feel quite clear about what I’m doing. That doesn’t really change depending on the wicket.”

When Bashir lines up for England this week it will mean he has played more Tests, 12, than the 11 other first-class matches he has played.

The 21-year-old has 38 victims for England including three five-wicket hauls, but remains Somerset’s second-choice spinner behind Leach.

“We’ve got a really good relationship,” said Leach. “Bash has got off to an amazing start. His talent is amazing. He has got such a high ceiling and he’s on the way to that. That’s exciting for English cricket.

“It might be different at Somerset next year. Who knows? For me it’s quite a fluid thing.

“Those are things I can’t control. Somerset and England are the teams I’ve been playing for. If they want to pick me, then I’ll give everything for them. That’s all I want to focus on.”

AN assistant referee was hit by a missile thrown from the stands at the end of a match.

A third-tier game between CF Montanesa and CE L’Hospitalet turned ugly as fans made their feelings clear.

3

3

Advertisement

3

They shouted at the officials as they walked off the pitch and a lighter was thrown at the assistant referee.

He raised his hand to block the object before clutching his face, appearing to be hurt.

Two people came to his aid but he seemed fine and began shouting towards the stand.

A Montanesa player then jumped to his defence and called for calm from the fans.

Spain has been hit by fan unrest in recent weeks with the Madrid derby halted by objects thrown from the stands last month.

Real Madrid goalkeeper Thibaut Courtois was the target of many of the missiles thrown due to his former ties with Atletico.

Atletico boss Diego Simeone criticised the behaviour of his fans after the match.

He said: “The message was to think about the club, think about your team.

“You aren’t helping the team. They said it wasn’t their fault, they said they’d been provoked by the opposition goalkeeper.”

CF Montanesa beat CE L’Hospitalet 1-0.

If you want to understand how brilliant – genius, even – a Formula 1 driver Max Verstappen is, watch exactly how he attacked Lando Norris at the start of the 2024 United States Grand Prix. And then ‘defended’ against him at the contest’s controversial conclusion.

This latest saga has frustratingly eclipsed the brilliant victory scored by Ferrari’s Charles Leclerc at Austin on Sunday. And the problem boils down to why both the Turn 1 and Turn 12 Verstappen vs Norris battles were essentially the same cynical tactic from the world champion.

Here rises the spectre of that 2021 campaign of campaigns – when Verstappen and his Red Bull squad fought Lewis Hamilton and Mercedes so bitterly. Given the tit-for-tat squabbling over ‘mini-DRS’ and bib-gate at McLaren and Red Bull respectively in the last two races, plus this being another season with multiple controversial racing clashes with the title protagonists, 2024 is firmly becoming a repeat.

Specifically here, however, it’s the 2021 Brazilian race that really matters. And how heading into Interlagos’ Turn 4 with Hamilton and his fresh engine grunt bearing down in arguably the Briton’s greatest ever F1 win, Verstappen steamed on with the inside line he’d taken in defence. Both flew into the runoff and the Red Bull remained ahead.

As with Interlagos, Verstappen’s onboard video feed at Austin was critically also broadcasting backwards – something to bear in mind when remembering how rapidly the stewards made this call. That’s something FIA sources insisted to Motorsport.com post-race is in line with what the teams have pushed for regarding stewarding decisions that impact podium appearances. Entertainment apparently trumps justice…

There are differences here to Brazil 2021 – but they matter. For Norris at Austin three years later, it’s how he did overtake off-track, but McLaren didn’t order him to give the place back and attack again.

Austin battle with Norris was reminiscent of Verstappen’s defence against Hamilton in the 2021 Brazilian GP that the Mercedes driver went on to win

Photo by: Charles Coates / Motorsport Images

When Motorsport.com asked him why not on Sunday night, team principal Andrea Stella explained that “on the pitwall and under my responsibility – but there was complete agreement by all the people involved in this interpretation – this situation did not need to be investigated”.

“If anything, we thought the investigation should be for Max pushing Lando off the track,” he added. “That’s what we thought was going to happen when we saw the case was under investigation. So, for us, there was no need to give back the position.”

For Hamilton in that Interlagos classic, he was able to pass at the same spot a short while later anyway and went on to win. Verstappen wasn’t even investigated in that case and here – in doing what the 2021 Mercedes couldn’t in a different runoff, Norris was penalised five seconds.

Although the speed specifics of Turn 4 Brazil and Turn 12 Austin are different, McLaren insiders are convinced that Verstappen’s manoeuvre here is of the same class as Brazil 2021

Motorsport.com also asked Stella, after he had stated “the defending car goes straight at the apex” for Verstappen at Austin Turn 12, if this was “Brazil 2021 all over again?”

“That was extreme because the speed of which Max missed the apex in Brazil,” he replied. “If you turned into Max, it was a big crash at the time. This one, it was a much slower speed so it could be a more benign situation. But it is just the fact – that you defend by going off the track? This cannot be permissible.”

But the Brazil point remains pertinent. After a little digging away from the dictaphones, it became clear that although the speed specifics of Turn 4 Brazil and Turn 12 Austin are different (plus the contrasting investigation/penalty outcomes), McLaren insiders are convinced that Verstappen’s manoeuvre here is of the same class as Brazil 2021.

Class is the key word. Because Verstappen is so good, it’s clear that after he raced Leclerc cleanly in the early 2022 contests, that a hiatus then ensued during the time he just had no opposition at the head of the pack for two years. In that time, he’s perfected essentially the same tactic. It now conforms with F1’s current racing rules and that is a huge problem.

All evidence points to Verstappen returning to tactics employed against Hamilton now he faces greater opposition

Photo by: Glenn Dunbar

Verstappen has shown yet again that he is willing to be completely ruthless to win – in this case extending his points lead over his title rival with the race victory already well lost. To a certain extent that is to be respected – applauded by some, no doubt. But it’s the cynicism of what’s happening repeatedly now that sours the taste of what was otherwise another brilliant F1 race this term. One with fantastic performances from multiple drivers.

The main dispute is how F1’s 2024 Driving Standards Guidelines (DSG) – a copy of which Motorsport.com has seen – just doesn’t cover what he’s doing. And that is: turning defence into attack. A la Brazil 2021. The point where cunning eases into crafty in a giant runoff area (and the lack of even a small gravel trap at Turns 1 or 12 at Austin is another, relevant, topic entirely here).

The DSG only cover – in 266 words and three quick sections – “Overtaking on the INSIDE of a corner” and “Overtaking on the OUTSIDE of a corner” (the capitals are the FIA’s). There’s an additional explanation for ‘chicanes and S-bends’, which doesn’t apply here.

When it comes to Norris’s penalty, the latter states that “to be entitled to be given room, including at the exit” the outside attacking car must have its front axle at least alongside at the apex and to the exit. Norris complies in this case, albeit from quite wide until he runs off track.

An outside attacking car must also be driven safely and controlled throughout such a move. No problem there for Norris. And it must be able to make the corner within track limits in these cases.

Here, GPS trace data becomes critical. Looking at the lap in question and the tour before, Norris brakes at the same point each time and made the corner, obviously, the first time – where Verstappen had jinked slightly less left that he soon would. The only car that braked later in all four points was Verstappen’s in the clash that had them both off the road.

Norris was penalised because he did overtake off the track. That it was “deemed to be a case of leaving the track and gaining a lasting advantage” in the relevant FIA bulletin. The stewards noted that he was also “not level with Car 1 at the apex”.

But in adding “Car 4 had little alternative other than to leave the track because of the proximity of Car 1, which had also left the track” to explain why Norris was only given a five-second penalty and not 10, the argument for applying a sanction is totally undermined.

Norris did get ahead of Verstappen outside the track limits and could not pull away to negate his five-second penalty

Photo by: Glenn Dunbar / Motorsport Images

Advertisement

What happened was either the fair outcome or Verstappen should’ve been penalised. But Verstappen wasn’t – despite Stella saying McLaren was so convinced he would be it “told Oscar [Piastri, behind in fifth] immediately to make sure he closed within five seconds of Max because there could be a position at stake”. And that trace data suggests why.

In his defence, echoed by team boss Christian Horner, Verstappen only deflected in the post-race press conference, saying “it’s very clear in the rules: outside the white line, you cannot pass”. “I’ve been done for it as well in the past,” he added, referring to the 2017 US GP here.

There are sub-issues at play. When assessing every investigated clash, the stewards have the power to be discretionary and the guidelines are exactly that. They even say, “not binding”, just before the nebulous “racing is a dynamic process”.

That’s the genius of Verstappen’s moves. He’s forcing the issue by racing to the apex – so the original attacker either choses to crash or will lose out under the rules

Post-race at Austin, Mercedes’ George Russell also called for “the same stewards all year long” – another long-standing problem with F1’s rules. And Russell matters here because he was penalised for a very similar incident with Sauber’s Valtteri Bottas at the same spot 39 laps earlier. The key difference: Russell was clearly attacking.

“By the letter of the law my penalty was correct,” the Briton explained.

The guidelines for overtaking on the inside, which is what Verstappen effectively ends up doing by braking later at Turn 12, contain three key requirements. The attacker must “have its front axle AT LEAST ALONGSIDE of the mirror of the other car no later than the apex of the corner”. Verstappen achieves this by braking later.

The attacker must also not force the other car off on exit in such a move and leave a “a fair and acceptable width” throughout. The attacker must stay also within track limits. Verstappen doesn’t comply with the last two points. But because the rules don’t cover attacking as a form of defence, all the responsibility still lies with Norris.

Race to the apex with Norris allowed Verstappen to exploit grey areas in racing rule guidelines

Photo by: Sam Bagnall / Motorsport Images

Advertisement

That’s the genius of Verstappen’s moves. He’s forcing the issue by racing to the apex – so the original attacker either choses to crash or will lose out under the rules.

Crashing might even have been a better option for Norris last Sunday – and at Turn 1 for that matter – given it could’ve triggered a discretionary stewards call in the subsequent investigation, which surely would’ve heard from both drivers. McLaren is also incensed this didn’t happen in reality at Austin.

Overall, that’s appalling – not to mention how a DNF would impact Norris far more in the title standings as the chaser.

The FIA can help solve this problem. First, by publishing the guidelines. Why not make a show of it, as football does with VAR?

Second, it now needs to enforce another ‘Max Verstappen rule’. While the short-lived 2016 edition dealt with dubious moving under braking, the governing body must codify how turning defending into attacking is specifically legal and outlaws the race-to-the-apex dive art Verstappen has perfected. It should do this before the next race in Mexico.

Or, really, just scrap the guidelines entirely. Either way – they are being stunningly, cynically exploited currently. And that isn’t right.

Doing this would ease the cynicism fatigue plenty of F1 fans are feeling right now. That’s been turbocharged by 2024’s Horner behaviour scandal and all the squabbling over flexi-wings and other design ploys.

Ultimately, the list of these ‘Verstappen defence’ moves now reads: Brazil 2021, Jeddah 2021, Las Vegas 2023, Budapest 2024 (when Verstappen was actually the attacker at Turn 1 and runs into the ‘let them race’ lap one approach that came into effect at the Austin start too) and now this year’s US GP. Enough.

Verstappen’s start aggression ultimately cost track position to Leclerc, but cost Norris far more

Photo by: Andreas Beil