Connect with us

Sports

Three things we learned from Chelsea win as substitutes make all the difference

Published

on

Three things we learned from Chelsea win as substitutes make all the difference

Chelsea Football Newsletter

After making headlines in recent days for what he has said, Enzo Maresca this time let the Chelsea supporters do the talking.

As he went over to the travelling fans at the Cardiff City Stadium, they were left chanting his name after the Blues reached the Carabao Cup semi-finals with a 3-1 win.

The performance itself was far from an encouraging one, particularly in the first half, but victory was what mattered most in the Welsh capital.

Despite being pegged back to 1-1 in the 75th minute by David Turnbull’s sensational header, a goal from Pedro Neto and two from Alejandro Garnacho — both of whom were substitutes — proved enough to send Chelsea into the next round.

Advertisement

Standard Sport’s Dom Smith picks out three key talking points from the game.

More questions over Maresca’s rotation

There has been criticism in recent weeks of how often Maresca rings the changes to his starting lineups, but he was always going to make wholesale alterations for this one with an eye to resting players for Saturday’s huge league game against Newcastle at St James’ Park.

But the 11 changes from the Everton win — an entirely new team — produced a repeat of the Lincoln game in September when they lacked cohesion and only won narrowly against League One opposition. For long periods, it showed again that the difference between Chelsea’s first XI and squad players remains concerningly big.

Advertisement

Chelsea were ponderous and stilted for all of the first half and long periods of the second. League One leaders Cardiff average more possession than any club in the top four divisions, and they, by contrast, looked assured on the ball and did not give it away needlessly.

Quality: Pedro Neto continues to prove one of Chelsea’s most reliable and consistent options in attack

Chelsea FC via Getty Images

Yes, Chelsea’s XI was inexperienced and featured four teenagers, but they should have played an awful lot better. It shouldn’t have needed the regulars to arrive as second-half substitutions for the Blues to click into gear and win the tie.

Slow starters but Chelsea grow into game

Advertisement

Chelsea looked lethargic in the first half. For that they had no excuse, given Maresca was largely playing his second-stringers, all of them short of minutes.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2025 Wordupnews.com