There were multiple great bags we tried whose features or designs just didn’t add up to a place in the top spots above. However, everyone has something different they’re looking for in a toiletry bag, so while not perfect for us, some of these options may still be perfect for you.
Photograph: Kat Merck
Patricks BB1 Bathroom Bag for $189: This crush-resistant, shock-absorbing rectangular bag is basically a heavier-duty, unisex version of the Flat Lay, below, except it costs four times as much. I tested it in the Triple Black colorway, which is “strictly limited to 1,000 pieces globally.” This one’s got two interior flaps with a slim, shallow zippered pouch on either side, but otherwise is just one big compartment that led to too much clinking and clanking of contents during my test. It’s great for full-sized products, but my testers and I all preferred bags that hold the products securely upright, as in the less expensive Parallelle Kit, above.
Flat Lay Makeup Box Bag for $37: Available in opaque-fabric and clear (“jelly”) styles, this unassuming pouch looks like a chubby rectangle with a handle on the end but actually unzips into a flat tray for easy access. There’s only one compartment, so I didn’t love it as a toiletry bag, but I did love it as a pool and beach accessory bag for sunscreen and makeup.
Advertisement
Monos Metro Toiletry Case for $95: This durable, structured case, available in either nylon or vegan leather, exhibits the class and quality construction Monos is known for. It has one main roomy compartment with three small pockets inside; one zippered. It did a great job of protecting its contents while still being squishable enough to fit in a tightly packed carry-on, though I did find myself wishing it had a handle for carrying.
Calpak Clear Cosmetics Case for $85: Constructed largely of water-resistant, wipe-clean PVC, this clear cosmetic case (I tested the Medium size) zips all the way around and folds flat to reveal two zippered compartments and one smaller zippered mesh bag. It also looks like a cute little purse with its 16 trendy color options, dual handles, and metal bottom studs. However, contents aren’t as easy to access as other cosmetic bags that just open from the top—you have to lay the Calpak flat to open both sides, which requires a 16-by-10-inch footprint.
Advertisement
Photograph: Kat Merck
Vera Bradley Toiletry Bags for $30: The erstwhile must-have accessory of both early-aughts Southern sorority girls and their grandmothers, Vera Bradley bags are back with a new spokesperson (Zooey Deschanel), new designs, and updated fabrics like smooth twill and cotton gabardine. (Die-hard fans can rest assured that the staple quilted paisley options are still available.) The new line includes multiple styles of toiletry bags and makeup bags that are lightweight, giftable, and can add a pop of color and personality to your travel setup. I tested several, and my favorite was the Lay-Flat Travel Organizer—its two interior clear zippered compartments and three mesh slip pockets were roomy yet snug enough to keep all contents of my morning routine secure, and a rather large spill of soap in the large pocket cleaned up quickly. However, even though the fabric is padded, which provides some protection for the interior contents, the exterior is somewhat absorbent and not machine washable (though other designs are), so be forewarned that light-colored options could attract stains.
Photograph: Kat Merck
Bagsmart Blast 4.5L Toiletry Bag for $30: This rectangular toiletry bag can sit on a counter (with about a 10 x 5-inch footprint) or hang with a 360-degree rotating hook. It’s machine washable and has a bright orange interior for visibility, sporting five mesh pockets. Both my testers and I liked it a lot. The only thing that kept it from nabbing a top spot is how much space it took up when not hanging, and when it did hang, it stuck out more than the traditional flat hanging styles.
Beis the Dopp Kit for $68: I’ve had Beis’ Dopp Kit for four years now, and it’s still my go-to for any trip. The poly canvas material is durable and easy to spot-clean. Plus, I opted for the black version to mask the inevitable scuffs and smaller stains. What I love the most, though, are the compartments. The water-resistant section is a total game-changer when packing liquids or fragrances. If something leaks, a quick wipe gets the job done. The waterproof bottom is also a huge bonus when I’m getting ready at a bathroom sink. —Boutayna Chokrane
Photograph: Kat Merck
Thule Aion Toiletry Bag for $65: This spacious, 5-liter bag with an 11 x 5-inch footprint features many thoughtful touches, including a wipe-clean interior with a rubbery, water-resistant bottom to protect it from wet countertops. (Though there’s also a handy strap that snaps to hang on any-diameter hook or rack.) The sides snap down to compress, almost like a packing cube, and I like that it’s squishable to fit into a smaller suitcase. It also comes with a removable translucent bag for taking liquids through the airport security line. However, it does take up a lot of space when not snapped down, and the waxed canvas does attract a lot of lines and marks, which may not be to everyone’s aesthetic taste.
Advertisement
Nex Dopp for $73: The small and large Dopp kits I tested, part of Nex’s 2024 Hawaii collection, consisted of a roomy, single compartment with a dual zippered strip. They’re made of microfiber leather, which is a higher-quality synthetic leather, said to be softer and more durable. The bags were stiff and well-structured, which felt protective of my cosmetics when jammed into my carry-on. There is a slight synthetic smell from the microfiber leather, which is hard to miss, since you must lean your face quite close to the bag to see the contents in the cavernous single compartment. I also felt that when the bag was unzipped, the zippered strip was either in the way or had to be splayed out, which took up too much space on my tiny hotel-bathroom shelf. Otherwise, this is a fine option that offers both a lifetime warranty and an unlimited trade-in program.
Cotopaxi Nido Accessory Bag Cada Día for $50: Cotopaxi’s trim little bag is meant not just for hygiene items, but any collection of odds and ends. It’s made from light recycled deadstock nylon (so, probably not for you if you are carrying glass bottles or anything that needs padding) and weighs in at a modest 6.5 ounces. Your colorway will be unique! I like the surprisingly capacious 4-liter capacity spread over three different compartments, with a big middle compartment for your quart-size, TSA-approved bag of liquids and two other compartments with separate, smaller pockets. I do have to admit, though, that I like hooks better than loops, and hanging is more convenient with a clamshell toiletry bag design than with this one, which can’t be hung while open. —Adrienne So
Photograph: Kat Merck
Kusshi Hair Tools Bag for $89: Unlike similar bags that just bunch up your hair tools into a roll, this hair tool carrier has two organized pocket sections; a zippered pouch in the middle for hair products or, in my case while I was testing, attachments for my Shark FlexFusion; and a pocket on the outside for rubber bands or small accessories like lip balm. It’s also made of neoprene that’s heat-resistant up to 380 degrees Fahrenheit, so you don’t have to worry about waiting for your tools to cool down before packing them away. Keep in mind, though, that the initial off-gassing is strong with this one—you may want to let it sit in a well-ventilated area for several days before packing it in your suitcase, lest it make everything else smell plasticky. This included the air from my hair dryer when I used it. There are also reports online of it not accommodating some Dyson tools, though it did fit an Airstrait and Corrale.
Advertisement
Photograph: Kat Merck
Aer Travel Kit 2 Ultra for $79: Does the average traveler need a toiletry bag made partially of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE), which is 15 times stronger than steel by weight? Perhaps not, but it definitely makes for an interesting bag. Part of Aer’s 10th Anniversary Ultra Collection, this hardy, chunky little Dopp kit incorporates the collection’s Ultra400X fabric (in black only) by Challenge Sailcloth, known for its high-performance sails for yacht racers and kite surfers. Despite its strength, the Travel Kit is still pretty lightweight at 8 ounces. However, the hook is thick plastic and too small for a towel rack, and the rubbery “Aer” brand tags on the outside and inside seem to accumulate toothbrush and soap residue, as does the mesh zippered pouch in the top compartment. Both proved somewhat difficult to clean.
Eagle Creek Pack-It Trifold Toiletry Kit for $50: Eagle Creek’s travel accessory game is extremely strong. Its toiletry bags, packing cubes, and various organizers are affordable, sturdy, and exceedingly well designed, and this toiletry bag is no exception. At first glance, it looks like two toiletry bags snapped together, but each side unzips to make a hanging organizer with six compartments. The only problem is that one side of the bag holds products upside down until it’s unfurled, which led to items falling out in my tests.
Photograph: Kat Merck
State Bags Benson Toiletry Kit for $65: This is a solid, simple bag with three mesh pouches and a snap-in/snap-out plastic envelope that can hold a toothbrush and toothpaste or shower items like soap. The navy version I tested had a coated polyester wipe-clean exterior and interior made from recycled bottles, and I liked that it had the option to hang. However, the organization was more rudimentary than similar-category bags we tested, and it was missing some of the thoughtful details featured on other bags in the same price range, like a quick-access pouch on the back and a larger hook with a rubber tip to prevent slipping. (This bag’s thick, small plastic hook wasn’t even wide enough to hang on a towel rack.)
Cuyana Travel Beauty Case for $298: Those still chasing the quiet luxury aesthetic will love this elegant zippered cosmetic case, available in black or pale pink. It’s made of high-end-feeling Italian pebbled leather both inside and out, with gold hardware and “Cuyana” discreetly printed on the bottom. It opens clamshell-style, and the lid contains a snap-close cover concealing a brush holder with elastic loops. A removable pouch snaps onto that lid cover, and the main compartment has a pocket for securing tubes, bottles, and small tools. Contents aren’t as immediately accessible as they are in other cosmetic cases I tested, but they are more secure. This bag is also on the heavy side, even for a cosmetics case, weighing in at 1.6 pounds, but if you can swing the price, this is a well-made, timeless investment for your travel arsenal.
Advertisement
Photograph: Kat Merck
Cincha the Toiletry Bag for $55: After testing nearly every style of toiletry bag in existence, I thought I had seen it all, but this thoughtfully designed bag from Cincha surprised me. The large size is essentially the tackle box of toiletry bags. It zips open in the middle to reveal four roomy compartments—two on each side, each topped with a small, translucent vinyl zippered pouch. I could not believe the amount of stuff I was able to fit into this thing, and yet I never had trouble closing it, despite packing it to the absolute max. I ended up taking it on a five-day getaway where I had to share a bathroom with two other people, and I found that I loved being able to flip it over and lift the “lid” of whatever side I needed, in order to keep the counter footprint small.
July Hanging Toiletry Bag for $85: I own and love July’s carry-on suitcase, so I was excited to try the brand’s popular hanging toiletry bag. It’s a great design with a zippered pouch on the back, plus a body that zips flat to reveal PVC and pouch zip compartments and a large, rubber-tipped metal hook that tucks away. It looks well-made and stylish with leather trim and gunmetal hardware, but my husband took it on a business trip and found that its pockets are actually quite small, confirming a worry I had when I tested it in my bathroom at home. It wouldn’t be an issue if the bag itself were small, but it took up a full quarter of the carry-on.
Tumi Alpha Bravo Response Kit for $225: This rugged-looking, ballistic nylon bag has the classic Tumi Tracer inside to help facilitate its return to you if it gets lost, as well as an antimicrobial lining. It can hang, stand up, or lie flat and has several convenient internal pockets and an external zipped pouch. It’s a lot of money for a toiletry bag with many of the same features as ones half the price, but if you’re a Tumi fan and need a toiletry bag to match your luggage, you could do worse than this model.
Advertisement
Photograph: Kat Merck
Beautifect Go Mini for $177: WIRED reviewer Louryn Strampe loved the larger Beautifect Box, and I tested the Mini to see if it would work for travel. While the smaller size does make it more portable (along with a purse-like carry strap), the multifunction lighted mirror and its battery made the lid top-heavy, so it kept flopping forward when I tried to use it on a soft, uneven surface like my lap or a bed. It’s also got a very hard case and is a bit heavy at almost 2.5 pounds, so as much as I wanted to take it with me on a plane, I ended up bringing a smaller bag instead. Worth a buy if you want a makeup case with a lighted mirror, but it’s definitely best for day trips.
Fjallraven Kanken Toiletry Bag for $60: I love this thing, which makes me feel like a Red Cross nurse on the battlefields of World War II. It’s made from a proprietary Fjallraven fabric blend that combines organic cotton with recycled polyester, so it feels like fabric but is more waterproof and durable. It has a clamshell design with a sturdy interior plastic hook. My quart bag of bottles goes into the enormous lower zip compartment, my toothbrush and deodorant in the top compartment, and there are mesh pockets and MOLLE webbing so that your tiny things are easily visible. However, its dimensions are very large, so this might not be for you if you’re a minimalist with just a toothbrush and a comb. —Adrienne So
Photograph: Kat Merck
Tom Beckbe Canvas Dopp Kit for $195: Known for its high-end jackets, field hats, and vests for fishing and waterfowl hunting, Birmingham, Alabama-based sports outfitter Tom Beckbe also makes a Dopp kit made of full-grain distressed leather and the brand’s proprietary Field Canvas. It matches the genteel Southern vibe of Tom Beckbe’s collection of other travel bags and related accessories like camo whiskey totes and insulated shooting gloves. If the Marlboro Man ever left the ranch, this is definitely the Dopp kit he would have used. The only downside is that the bag is relatively large—and dark inside—for what’s essentially one compartment.
Eagle Creek Pack-It Isolate Quick Trip for $25: This little bag is a simple design, made from recycled bottles, with a zipper on the top and on the side. However, its light weight and semi-structured shape make it perfect for holding a wallet and keys at the gym, or even as a tech pouch for work purposes.
Advertisement
Kusshi Neoprene Wristlet Clutch for $39: It’s a purse! It’s a toiletry bag! It’s a purse that doubles as a toiletry bag! This clutch is the perfect size for a larger phone, e-reader, or small tablet, with a couple of mesh pockets for makeup. I used it to tote a day’s worth of makeup and skincare around town and found it was just heavy enough to be burdensome, but if you like the neoprene look and your essentials are lightweight, this clutch, like most Kusshi products, is sturdy and well-made.
Sympl Dopp Kit for $75: I liked this bag’s durable Cordura exterior and stow-away clip for hanging, as well as the fact it has a lifetime warranty. The bag opens clamshell-style to reveal four simple waterproof zip pockets—two thin and horizontal, one small rectangle, and one larger rectangle. It’s an interesting idea, but in practice, this severely limits utility since a user is restricted to specific toiletry-sized products that fit the shape of each of the pockets. (My deodorant did not fit, nor did a toothbrush in a case.)
Photograph: Kat Merck
Bagsmart Paz Hanging Toiletry Bag for $35: With its stylish, padded exterior; generously sized carry handle; and ability to transport up to eight full-sized products, this one had me reaching for it long after the testing period was over. The thin, tipped metal hanger makes it easy to hang anywhere, and there’s an easy-access compartment on the front with loops for makeup brushes or other long, thin items. In fact, this is almost a small toiletry briefcase rather than a bag—the whole thing unfurls into a 33-inch-long organizer with four separate compartments (two with sections to hold full-sized products). It will almost certainly be too much for anyone who likes to travel light, but if you check your luggage, will be on the road for a long time, or just don’t want to deal with decanting your personal care products, this is a well-designed and easy-to-use solution.
Advertisement
Saltyface Everywhere Bag for $36: Technically designed to store Saltyface self-tanners and bronzers, this puffy black fabric bag spent an indordinate amount of time on my counter, simply because I liked how it looked. Practically speaking, though, the handle was too small for an adult-sized hand, and I found myself becoming irritated with the single zipper pull, so it’s not ideal as a general-purpose travel toiletry bag.
FAQs
For bags our team hasn’t already been using for years, I spend a four-week period rotating new toiletry bags during my morning routine. I note any annoyances or unique details, volume, how easy it is to store and retrieve items, how much space each one takes up on the vanity, how they survive being splashed with water and soap, and, if the bag can hang, how easy it is to retrieve items once hanging.
About every three months, my family goes on trips that require stays in hotels. I always take different groups of bags and determine how easy it is to use multiple bags at once in a small space, if hook designs allowed for multiple places to hang, and whether the contents spilled in or otherwise dirtied the bags, and if so, how easy they are to clean. For bags I am not able to take on trips, I lend them to friends and family members who are traveling and take down their notes to consider alongside my own home testing.
How Does WIRED Obtain Toiletry Bags for Testing?
Advertisement
Some toiletry bags are review samples requested from the manufacturer, while others are purchased and expensed. Review samples are only accepted without promise of editorial coverage. Toiletry bags chosen as picks are reused for durability testing purposes, while all other bags are donated upon completion of testing.
What Kind of Toiletry Bag Do You Need?
Dopp kits, cosmetics cases, hanging bags … the differences between categories aren’t always clear. Here are some of the more common types of toiletry bags you’ll come across, and what to consider with each.
Dopp kit: Named for leather craftsman Charles Doppelt, who provided “Dopps,” or toiletry kits, for WWII soldiers. “Dopp kit” has evolved over time to indicate any kind of portable toiletry organizer, but commercially, toiletry bags labeled “Dopp kits” tend to be smaller and hold just a handful of necessities for short trips as opposed to larger fold-up hanging bags and cosmetics cases.
Advertisement
Cosmetics case: Designed for those who need more than just the necessities, a cosmetics case is usually a much larger boxlike container with specialized compartments for makeup, skin care, hair care, and other necessities. They often come with extras like brush holders and mirrors.
Hanging toiletry bag: A bag that, as the name indicates, comes with a hook so that it can be hung on a hook, towel rack, tree, or someplace it won’t take up space on the counter. Often, the user needs to hang them to be able to access all the storage compartments. Something to consider is that hooks can be used up quite quickly if everyone in your hotel room has a hanging bag. All the hooks in our bathroom were taken almost immediately, so my husband ended up having to hang his bag over the toilet, which he wasn’t thrilled about. A good hanging toiletry bag will also have a hook that’s thin enough to slip over just about any hook, and be rubber-tipped so it won’t slide off.
Automattic has added write capabilities to WordPress.com’s MCP integration, giving AI agents like Claude and ChatGPT the ability to create posts, build pages, manage comments, and restructure content, all through natural conversation, with human approval at every step.
For most of the past six months, connecting an AI agent to your WordPress.com site has meant giving it a window. You could ask Claude or ChatGPT questions about your content, pull up site analytics, or check which posts hadn’t been updated in a year. Useful, but fundamentally passive.
The update adds 19 new operations across six content types: posts, pages, comments, categories, tags, and media. From a single natural language prompt, an agent can draft and publish a post, build a landing page using your theme’s block patterns, approve and reply to comments, reorganise category structures, or fix missing alt text across your entire media library.
Advertisement
The underlying architecture, MCP, an open protocol that standardises how applications provide context to large language models, was first introduced on WordPress.com in October 2025. At that point it was read-only: agents could query your site but could not touch it.
A second update in January 2026 added OAuth 2.1 authentication, making it simpler to connect AI clients securely. In February, Automattic launched an official Claude Connector, again read-only at the time. Today’s write capabilities are the step the platform has been building towards.
The feature is designed around explicit human approval. Before creating, updating, or deleting anything, the agent describes exactly what it plans to do and asks for confirmation. New posts default to draft status, giving users a chance to review before anything goes live; modifying a published post triggers a warning that changes will be immediately visible.
Deletions of posts, pages, comments, and media send items to the trash, where they are recoverable for 30 days. Categories and tags, which WordPress cannot trash, trigger an additional confirmation warning that deletion is permanent. Every action is logged in the site’s Activity Log.
Advertisement
User role permissions are fully enforced: an Editor can create and edit posts but cannot change site settings; a Contributor can draft but not publish.
One of the more technically interesting aspects of the implementation is theme awareness. Before creating a page or post, the agent can read the site’s design system, colours, fonts, spacing, block patterns, and generate content that inherits those specifications.
The write capabilities are available today on all WordPress.com paid plans. Users enable them through the MCP dashboard at wordpress.com/me/mcp, toggling on the specific operations they want to permit on each site.
Compatible clients include Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor, and any other MCP-enabled tool. WordPress.com powers a significant share of the web, according to figures presented at Automattic’s State of the Word event in December 2025, WordPress runs more than 43% of all websites globally and holds a 60.5% share of the content management system market.
Advertisement
The scale at which write-capable AI agents can now operate across that infrastructure is considerable.
The MCP ecosystem has been expanding rapidly. The WordPress MCP Adapter, which enables similar functionality on self-hosted WordPress installations, has been moving toward inclusion in WordPress Core.
Automattic’s other products, including WooCommerce and Beeper, have their own MCP implementations. The pattern, standardised AI agent access to application functionality, rather than one-off integrations, is becoming an architectural assumption rather than an experiment.
For WordPress.com users, the practical question is trust. Giving an AI agent write access to a production site is a different proposition from asking it to summarise your traffic. Automattic has leaned into this explicitly, making the approval model the centrepiece of the announcement and granular per-operation toggles the default configuration.
Itacho Sushi was a Hong Kong sushi brand that has been around for 22 years
Earlier this week, another name had been added to Singapore’s ever-growing list of F&B casualties.
Itacho Sushi shuttered all its remaining outlets here on Monday (Mar 16), following a spate of closures over the past year.
The Hong Kong-based sushi chain’s last four outlets at Ion Orchard, Bugis Junction, The Star Vista, and Novena Square 2 are now listed as “permanently closed” on Google Maps. Its website, social media accounts, and mobile app have all been taken down—without any public announcement from the company.
Government records on the Bizfile portal show that Itacho BM, the Singapore-registered company behind the chain’s local operations, has been marked as “gazetted to be struck off” the Accounting and Corporate Regulatory Authority’s Register of Companies. The notice was first published on Feb 13.
Advertisement
For a brand that has been around for 22 years—17 in Singapore—the silence was telling. We look back at how a chain that once drew crowds for “cheap and good” sushi ended up here, with no farewell and no explanation.
Itacho Sushi had over 40 outlets in three markets at its peak
Ricky Cheng was a Hong Kong food entrepreneur and TV personality./ Image Credit: The Standard
Itacho Sushi was founded in Hong Kong by the late food entrepreneur Ricky Cheng Wai-tao, also known as “Ricky San” for his knowledge of Japanese dining culture.
Cheng’s culinary journey began in Japan, where he studied in his early years. He returned to Hong Kong in 1989 and launched his first venture, a Japanese pancake shop called Pancake House, in 1992. At its peak, the chain operated 20 branches, but it closed by 1996 as the pancake craze waned.
He then brought the Ajisen Ramen brand to Hong Kong via a franchise model in 1996 before co-founding the Itamae Sushi chain in 2004 and later launching Itacho Sushi in 2007.
In 2008, Cheng, who made frequent television appearances, even made history as the first non-Japanese winner of the annual tuna auction at Tokyo’s Tsukiji Market, securing a bluefin tuna with a winning bid of HK$430,000 (approximately S$70,239).
Cheng brought Itacho Sushi to Singapore in July 2009 as a subsidiary of Taste of Japan Group, the Hong Kong-founded parent company established in 2004. Local operations were managed by Itacho BM.
The sushi chain continued to expand steadily over the years.
At its peak around 2019, Itacho Sushi had a strong presence across Asia, with 10 outlets in Singapore, nearly 30 in Hong Kong, and additional locations in Japan—bringing its total to more than 40 restaurants across the three markets.
Legal battles & worsening health made Cheng step back
Itacho Sushi’s offerings./ Image Credit: Robert Robert via Google Reviews
But Cheng’s success would not last. The sushi boss was embroiled in a series of legal battles over the years.
Before Itacho Sushi, Cheng had gone into business with siblings Daisy and Jason Poon. The three had worked together since 1996, when they brought Ajisen Ramen to Hong Kong.
In 2004, they joined forces again to launch Itamae Sushi under a company called Smart Wave Ltd, with Cheng as sole director and the Poons as shareholders.
After the success of the first Itamae Sushi branch, the siblings accused Cheng of opening six additional branches of Itamae Sushi in Hong Kong without their knowledge, each under a different company, where Cheng was the sole director and shareholder. He was also accused of opening competing chain Itacho Sushi without informing them.
This resulted in a lawsuit filed by the Poons against Cheng in 2013. The siblings won, with the High Court finding that Cheng breached fiduciary duty in 2015. He lost the lawsuit and subsequent appeal in 2016 and was ultimately ordered to pay hefty legal costs and damages.
Advertisement
Ricky Cheng./ Image Credit: Edward Wong
Then came another blow.
In 2017, Cheng revealed he had been diagnosed with pancreatic cancer. He gradually stepped away from the business, and in Apr 2024, passed away in Tokyo at the age of 57.
That same year, Itacho Sushi quietly shut down all its outlets in Hong Kong, and its parent company, Taste of Japan, was deregistered. A Google search for its Japan outlets did not turn up any results, and it is unclear when they closed in Japan, too.
Commenting on the closure of Itacho Sushi’s Hong Kong outlets, Simon Wong Ka-wo, President of the Hong Kong Federation of Restaurants and Related Trades, said: “Following his death, nobody was left to take care of it.”
Wong added that the chain had been in decline for nearly a decade, worn down by prolonged legal disputes, the lasting damage of the pandemic, and ultimately, the loss of the man who built it.
Advertisement
Singapore, it turns out, simply seems like the last to go.
Good while it lasted
Following Itacho Sushi’s closure in Singapore, several netizens have taken to Reddit to share their thoughts on the Hong Kong-founded Japanese restaurant chain.
Many reminisced fondly about its early years—a go-to spot for “cheap and good Japanese food” with its discount menu and generous portions. One user recalled it as “one of the few good Japanese restaurants with a large variety of Japanese food, not just sushi and ramen.”
Comments from Reddit on Itacho Sushi’s sudden closure in Singapore./ Image Credit: Vulcan Post
However, in recent years, particularly after the COVID-19 period, the netizen added that the chain has been on a “huge downhill,” using “less fresh ingredients” and “making portion sizes smaller,” all while “increasing prices”—a sentiment corroborated by another internet user.
Another remarked that Itacho Sushi had simply joined the growing list of restaurants to “bite the dust” in Singapore—a market where Japanese dining options are endless, competition is fierce, and closures are anything but rare.
Advertisement
The full picture, however, is harder to pin down. Was it the legal battles that drained its founder? The pandemic that gutted foot traffic? The cost-cutting that eroded customer trust? Or the death of the one man who held it all together? Likely, some combination of all.
Whatever the reason, the quiet disappearance of a brand that fed Singaporeans for 17 years is telling—another reminder that in one of Asia’s most competitive dining markets, even long-standing names are never too big to vanish without a word.
Read other articles we’ve written on Singaporean businesses here.
Featured Image Credit: Aldrin Tee via Google Reviews
We may receive a commission on purchases made from links.
While it might not seem like a tool needed by all, hot glue guns are quite versatile. There are numerous helpful, unexpected ways a hot glue gun can improve a home, and plenty of models from major brands to choose from. For instance, Ryobi has a selection of cordless hot glue guns for sale. One of these models is currently on sale at Home Depot for $59.97, and for that discounted price, the hot glue gun comes with a handful of extras, including a 2.0 Ah Ryobi battery to run it.
Advertisement
The Ryobi ONE+ 18-volt cordless hot glue gun with battery was initially listed by Home Depot for $148.97, but at the time of writing, it is currently on a 60% markdown. This is a dual-temperature model, so the user can adjust the heat based on the job and adhesive used. It also features a fold-out drip tray in case of running adhesive, and is advertised as reaching its heat up target in two minutes. Along with the battery, the kit comes with 10 glue sticks and multiple nozzles. A charger for the battery is sold separately.
Advertisement
Customers’ opinions of this discounted glue gun are mostly positive
At full price as well as on discount, many Home Depot customers have purchased and tried out this Ryobi hot glue gun. The number of reviews is currently sitting at 1,006, with an average of 4.6 out of 5 stars. 780 of those reviews gave the kit a perfect five stars, praising it for being easy to use overall. These users reported that the gun heated up quickly and found the two temperature settings satisfactory for their needs. Most five-star reviewers who discussed battery life added that the included 2.0 Ah battery held on just fine, though using higher Ah Ryobi batteries yielded improved runtimes.
Meanwhile, there’s a common thread through most of the one- and two-star reviews: the battery can be a problem. Many of the reviews at this rating report receiving a battery that doesn’t work at all, or only gets around 15 minutes or less of use time before needing to be charged. These are some of the most common issues with Ryobi power tool batteries, but fortunately, the company is willing to work with customers when things go wrong. Both the hot glue gun and the included battery are under Ryobi’s three-year warranty, meaning free repair or replacement if faulty workmanship is determined to be the culprit. Not everyone is in need of a hot glue gun, but according to the majority of Home Depot buyers, those who are should consider this Ryobi kit, even with the minimal risk of a faulty battery.
Looking for the most recent Connections answers? Click here for today’s Connections hints, as well as our daily answers and hints for The New York Times Mini Crossword, Wordle, Connections: Sports Edition and Strands puzzles.
English majors, today’s NYT Connections puzzle has a purple category with our names on it. Read on for clues and today’s Connections answers.
The Times has a Connections Bot, like the one for Wordle. Go there after you play to receive a numeric score and to have the program analyze your answers. Players who are registered with the Times Games section can now nerd out by following their progress, including the number of puzzles completed, win rate, number of times they nabbed a perfect score and their win streak.
Here are four hints for the groupings in today’s Connections puzzle, ranked from the easiest yellow group to the tough (and sometimes bizarre) purple group.
Apple unexpectedly launched yet another device, the very long-awaited AirPods Max, plus the MacBook Neo gets more real-world testing, and Family Sharing gets a great update, all on the AppleInsider Podcast.
Nobody saw it coming but the new AirPods Max is here — image credit: Apple
Just when you thought Apple was done with product launches in March — and just when you thought it would never update the AirPods Max — it went and did it. The new AirPods Max brings everything users have been asking for over the last several years. There’s reason to suspect the new AirPods Max is going to feel outdated in even just a few months, though. And also plenty of reasons to assume Apple won’t release a new version for a long time. Continue Reading on AppleInsider | Discuss on our Forums
schwit1 shares a report from the BBC: A French officer has reportedly revealed the location of an aircraft carrier deployed towards the Middle East after publicly registering a run on sports app Strava. French news outlet Le Monde first reported the officer, referred to as Arthur, logged a 35-minute run on the app while exercising on the deck of aircraft carrier Charles de Gaulle on 13 March. He used a smartwatch to record his run and upload the activity to the app, the paper said, creating a map that showed his location. […] The location of the vessel was said by Le Monde to have been northwest of Cyprus, around 100km (62 miles) from the Turkish coast, with satellite images capturing the carrier and its escort. A representative from the French Armed Forces said the officer’s behavior “does not comply with current guidelines,” which “sailors are regularly made aware of.”
Update: Added that Oracle declined to comment on whether the vulnerability has been exploited.
Oracle has released an out-of-band security update to fix a critical unauthenticated remote code execution vulnerability in Identity Manager and Web Services Manager tracked as CVE-2026-21992.
Oracle Identity Manager is used for managing identities and access across an enterprise, while Oracle Web Services Manager provides security and management controls for web services.
In an advisory released yesterday, Oracle is “strongly” recommending that customers apply the patches as soon as possible.
Advertisement
“This Security Alert addresses vulnerability CVE-2026-21992 in Oracle Identity Manager and Oracle Web Services Manager. This vulnerability is remotely exploitable without authentication. If successfully exploited, this vulnerability may result in remote code execution,” reads the security advisory.
“Oracle strongly recommends that customers apply the updates or mitigations provided by this Security Alert as soon as possible. Oracle always recommends that customers remain on actively-supported versions and apply all Security Alerts and Critical Patch Update security patches without delay.”
The CVE-2026-21992 vulnerability has a CVSS v3.1 severity score of 9.8 and impacts Oracle Identity Manager versions 12.2.1.4.0 and 14.1.2.1.0, as well as Oracle Web Services Manager versions 12.2.1.4.0 and 14.1.2.1.0.
Oracle says the flaw is of low complexity, remotely exploitable over HTTP, and does not require authentication or user interaction, increasing the risk of exploitation on exposed servers.
Advertisement
The fix was released through its Security Alert program, which delivers out-of-schedule fixes or mitigations for critical or actively exploited vulnerabilities. However, Oracle says that patches released through these programs are only offered for versions under Premier or Extended Support, and older unsupported versions may be vulnerable.
Oracle has not disclosed whether the vulnerability has been exploited and declined to comment when BleepingComputer asked about its exploitation status.
In a separate blog post published today, Oracle once again noted the severity of CVE-2026-21992 and warned customers to review the security alert for full details and patch information.
Malware is getting smarter. The Red Report 2026 reveals how new threats use math to detect sandboxes and hide in plain sight.
Download our analysis of 1.1 million malicious samples to uncover the top 10 techniques and see if your security stack is blinded.
The famous cuckoo clock, with its moving, chirping mechanical bird indicating various divisions of time, has been around since at least the 1600s. The most famous of them come from the Black Forest area of Germany, and are still being made worldwide even today. Other clocks with different themes take their inspiration from the standard bird-based clocks from history, and thanks to modern 3D printing and other technologies we can make clocks with almost any type of hour indicator we’d like with relative ease like [Jason]’s golf clock.
While the timekeeping mechanism is a fairly standard analog clock, the hour indicator mechanism in this build is a small figure which putts a golf ball into a hole once every hour. It uses an ESP32-C3 at its core, which controls a pair of servos. One controls the miniature golfer, and the other lifts the ball up into position on the green at the appointed time. Once the ball is in place, the figure rotates, striking the ball towards the hole. Although it looks almost like the ball is guided by a magnet of some sort at first glance, the ball naturally finds its way into the hole by the topography of the green alone.
Almost all of the parts in this build are 3D printed, including the green, the golfer, the frame, and a number of the servo components. There’s also a small sensor that detects if the ball has actually made it into the hole and back to the lifting mechanism, and to that end there’s also a number of configurations that can be made in the software to ensure that the servos controlling everything all work together to putt the ball properly.
The White House has announced a new AI policy framework that calls for Congress to craft federal regulation that overrules state AI laws. The Trump administration has made multiple attempts to overrule more restrictive state-level AI regulation, but has failed so far, most notably in the passing of the “One Big Beautiful Bill.”
The framework focuses on a variety of topics, covering everything from child privacy to the use of AI in the workforce. “Importantly, this framework can succeed only if it is applied uniformly across the United States,” The White House writes. “A patchwork of conflicting state laws would undermine American innovation and our ability to lead in the global AI race.”
In terms of child privacy protections, the framework ask for Congress to require companies to provide tools like “screen time, content exposure and account controls” while also affirming that “existing child privacy protections apply to AI systems,” including limits on how data is collected and used for AI training. The framework also says carveout states should be allowed to enforce “their own generally applicable laws protecting children, such as prohibitions on child sexual abuse material, even where such material is generated by AI.”
The energy-use and environmental impact of AI infrastructure is a going concern, but the White House’s policy proposals are primarily worried about the cost of data centers. The framework suggests federal AI regulation should make sure that higher electricity costs aren’t passed on to people living near data centers, while streamlining the process for permitting AI infrastructure construction, so companies can pursue “on-site and behind-the-meter power generation.” The framework also calls for fewer restrictions on the software-side of AI development, proposing “regulatory sandboxes for AI applications” and asking Congress to “provide resources to make federal datasets accessible to industry and academia in AI-ready formats.”
Advertisement
While a recently AI bill from Senator Marsha Blackburn (R-Ten.) attempts to eliminate Section 230, a piece of a larger law that says platforms can’t be held responsible for the speech they host, the framework appears to propose the opposite. “Congress should prevent the United States government from coercing technology providers, including AI providers, to ban, compel or alter content based on partisan or ideological agendas,” the White House writes. The framework is similarly hands-off when it comes to copyright and the use of intellectual property to train AI. “Although the Administration believes that training of AI models on copyrighted material does not violate copyright laws,” the White House writes, it supports the issue being settled in court rather than by legislation. Though, the White House does think Congress should “consider enabling licensing frameworks” so IP holders can bargain for compensations from AI providers.
The clincher in the White House’s proposal is the idea that federal regulation should preempt state law, specifically so that states don’t “regulate AI development,” don’t “unduly burden American’s use of AI for activity that would be lawful if performed without AI” and don’t punish AI companies “for a third party’s unlawful conduct involving their models.” The idea that AI companies aren’t liable for the illegal or harmful uses of their products is particularly problematic because it lies at the heart of multiple intersecting issues with AI right now, including it being used to generate sexually explicit images of children and allegedly playing a role in the suicide of users.
Ultimately, though, the framework might be too contradictory to be useful, Samir Jain, the Vice President of Policy for the Center for Democracy and Technology, writes in a statement to Engadget:
The White House’s high-level AI framework contains some sound statements of principles, but its usefulness to lawmakers is limited by its internal contradictions and failure to grapple with key tensions between various approaches to important topics like kids’ online safety. It rightly says that the government should not coerce AI companies to ban or alter content based on ‘partisan or ideological agendas,’ yet the Administration’s ‘woke AI’ Executive Order this summer does exactly that. On preemption, the framework asserts that states should not be permitted to regulate AI development, but at the same time rightly notes that federal law should not undermine states’ traditional powers to enforce their own laws against AI developers. States are currently leading the fight to protect Americans from harms that AI systems can create, and Congress has twice correctly decided not to pursue broad preemption.
President Donald Trump has attempted to have an active role in how AI is developed and regulated in the US with mixed results, primarily because, as Jain notes, Congress has been unwilling to give up states’ right to regulate the technology on their own terms. Without that, its hard to say how much of the framework will actually make it into federal law.
Somehow, the whole thing got even faster. Earlier this month, Chinese automaker BYD announced that its Flash Chargers, first rolled out a year ago, can now charge some electric vehicle batteries from around 10 to 70 percent in five minutes, and from 10 to full in about nine. That’s more than 600 miles of range in the time it takes to order a cappuccino and leave a nice tip.
The new BYD chargers can add miles super quickly because they deliver up to 1,500 kilowatts (kW) per charge. Compare that to the 350 kW “hyper-fast” chargers seen more typically in the US, which can top up 80 percent of a battery in 15 to 25 minutes, and the full thing in closer to 40.
BYD’s move brings the charging experience closer to the auto industry’s holy grail: comparable to what drivers expect when they fill up their gas tanks. Survey after surveyfinds that potential EV buyers are worried about range and charging; speeding things up might go some way toward alleviating fears and getting more drivers seriously thinking about the plug. BYD, which doesn’t sell in the US because of high tariffs and national security concerns, has built more than 4,000 of the chargers in China so far, with plans to construct some 16,000 more by the end of the year, plus 2,000 in Europe.
There is, naturally, a catch—plus a few reasons to believe that a super fast charger won’t solve all of the world’s charging issues.
Advertisement
Right now, only one car will be able to take advantage of the Flash Chargers’ hyperspeed in Europe: BYD’s Denza Z9GT, due to make its Paris debut next month. That’s because the EV comes with the newest generation of BYD’s Blade battery. Making its own cars, its own chargers, and its own batteries gives BYD a significant leg-up in charging speeds over most global competitors, as the tech works together. (Tesla has also vertically integrated the charging experience.) To charge at such high speeds, the vehicles’ software and wiring need to be built to handle that much electric current.
BYD didn’t respond to WIRED’s questions, but according to Chinese language media, the newest Blade battery uses a lithium manganese iron phosphate (LMFP) chemistry to increase energy density. (The last version used lithium-iron phosphate, or LFP, which trades some energy density for durability and fast-charging capability). BYD says it has redesigned all of its battery elements, including the electrodes that store and release energy, the electrolytes that allow for ion transfer between electrodes during charging and discharging cycles, and the separators that disconnect and then conduct ion flow.
This all ups the battery’s energy density by 5 percent compared to what it touted as the latest and greatest last year. BYD says the Denza Z9GT can hit more than 620 miles per charge. (Real-life ranges tend to be a bit lower than claims by auto companies.)
The charger itself, a slick, teal T-shaped system that evokes—you guessed it—a gas station pump, belies its complexity. Dishing out more than a megawatt from the electric grid is no small feat, both in hardware and construction involved. BYD says it will make the rollout of the new charger a little easier by incorporating them into existing BYD charging banks, so that the infrastructure isn’t starting from scratch. Beyond that, BYD says it will use storage batteries at the charging sites to supplement the electrical grid, so the grid isn’t overloaded.
Advertisement
The Limits
Despite these impressive speeds, don’t expect BYD’s new system to change the game for EVs. “It’s a good, marginal improvement in technology,” says Gil Tal, who directs the EV Research Center at UC Davis’ Institute of Transportation Studies. “It’s not something that changes most people’s daily life.”
The first reason is practical. Today, most US EV owners have access to at-home charging and only use public fast-chargers on the occasional trip that stretches their 250-mile range. For those people, the difference between charging in 20 minutes and in 5 minutes might be close to negligible.
-Closed-Open-Reviewer-Photo-SOURCE-Kat-Merck.png)
-Closed-Open-Reviewer-Photo-SOURCE-Kat-Merck.png)
-Front-Overhead-Closed-Reviewer-Photo-SOURCE-Kat-Merck-NO-BORDER.jpg)
-SOURCE-Kat-Merck.jpg)
You must be logged in to post a comment Login