Connect with us

Tech

2026 Loki Prevost H3-45 Motorhome Could be the Most Luxurious Yet, Costs $2.2-Million

Published

on

2026 Loki Prevost Motorhome H3-45
The 2026 Loki Prevost H3-45, a 45-foot diesel coach, arrives on the scene and completely upends all we thought we understood about what a motorhome should be. Built on the Prevost H3-45 VIP chassis, this beast boasts a 550 horsepower Volvo D13 engine mated with a huge 1,850 pound-feet of torque, resulting in a seriously smooth and confident drive that doesn’t go all dramatic. That chassis, of course, includes all of the bells and whistles, such as self-leveling suspension, electronic stability systems, and driving aids that make long trips a breeze rather than a grind.



Loki Coach approaches the conversion with a perfectly rational perspective, which is more than a bit refreshing. The lines are sleek and minimalist, all black with a hint of a glow from the continuous LED lighting that runs up the edge of the device; no flash, no bother. The quad slides significantly increase the living area, but you’d never know it by looking at it, as it still appears sleek and purposeful, with none of the bulbous overhang seen on some other rigs.


EF ECOFLOW Portable Power Station DELTA 2, 1024Wh LiFePO4 (LFP) Battery, 1800W AC/100W USB-C Output,…
  • 7 X Faster Charging. 0-80% in just 50 mins and 0-100% in 80 mins with AC input. That’s ideal when you need home backup power and a quick charge using…
  • Expandable Capacity from 1-3kWh. With the standalone portable power station sporting 1kWh, you can add on extra batteries to reach up to 3kWh. Ideal…
  • Power Almost Anything. Portable batteries have come a long way. Power all your appliances with 1800W output, that’s on par with outdoor generators…


Stepping inside, the area unfolds with great care and attention to detail. You’ve got hardwood cabinetry with nice soft-close hinges, all dovetail joinery, and stone surfaces everywhere, on the counters, the farmhouse sink, the dining table, as all the kitchen stuff is top-shelf GE Cafe appliances, such as a convection microwave, double-door fridge, drawer dishwasher, and it all just fits right into this super simple layout. You have two pantries and plenty of storage to keep everything organized, but it still feels wide and open.

2026 Loki Prevost Motorhome H3-45
Living areas, on the other hand, are all about getting it just right; a pull-out sofa anchors the lounge, and the bar setup near the driver’s seat is exactly what you need, and then there’s the workstation, which includes a 27″ monitor on a hydraulic lift, allowing you to simply start working without disrupting the entire flow. The chairs are really comfortable, and the Sonos audio system fills the space with sound, which even reaches outdoors under the power awnings. Of course, you have keyless access, a Ring doorbell camera, and a Garmin command center with all of the settings right at your fingertips.

2026 Loki Prevost Motorhome H3-45
Bedrooms are all about the king bed, which is flanked by dual wardrobes and a rising elevator TV, with padded ceilings throughout to help with acoustics. The back ensuite bathroom features a large tiled shower, a stone vanity, a cosmetics station, and even its own toilet with drawer. You also have a separate half bath up front with a porcelain macerating toilet and mirrored cupboards, a washing and dryer hidden behind retractable doors, a coffee station, and a second pantry.

2026 Loki Prevost Motorhome H3-45
This thing is all about energy independence, with 400 watts of solar on the roof, giant lithium batteries, a commercial onan generator, and hydronic heating that warms up the entire area. The water capacities of 172 gallons fresh, 115 gray, and 60 black are adequate for some extended off-grid living. It all works effortlessly, with the screens rising and falling without your notice, the lighting adjusting without any obvious switches, and everything humming silently in the background.

2026 Loki Prevost Motorhome H3-45
All of this refinement costs around $2.2 million, which is a reasonable sum for all of the artistry and attention to detail that has gone into this project.
[Source]

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Tech

Insta360 Ace Pro 2 Xplorer Grip Pro Kit Review: An Even Better Action Camera

Published

on

The final exposure control feature is one I use a lot, and it’s exposure compensation. This works with the auto exposure and can be used to combat the tendency to go too slow with the shutter speed be forcing the Ace Pro 2 to underexpose the image. The exposure comp here is the best among action cameras, running from –4 stops to + 4 stops in ⅓-stop increments. I set the Xplorer Grip to control EV, so when I am in auto mode, the dial is an exposure comp dial just like “real” camera. (The dial can also be set to control ISO, shutter speed, shooting mode, filter selection, and white balance.)

Even better, if you’re in manual mode and you want to go back to auto, the first click of the dial will open the side panel, the second will switch from manual to auto, the third will start adjusting your exposure value. This is a really fast way to get from a carefully composed exposure back to full auto without needing to get into the touchscreen menus.

The final thing worth mentioning is the included Leica color profiles. If you haven’t updated your firmware recently, you should. Insta360 has added a few more of these. Because I shoot RAW, I don’t use these much, but as color profiles go these are great, especially the new Leica high-contrast black and white, which is what I’ve been using most of the time. This way I get a black-and-white JPG and a full-color RAW file.

To be honest, I did not have high hopes for the Xplorer Grip Pro Kit. For me, action cameras have primarily been for shooting around water, and while that still works with the bare camera, it doesn’t with the grip. However, I was pleasantly surprised using the Ace Pro 2 with the Xplorer grip as an everyday camera.

Advertisement

I would say it’s best thought of as a compliment to your existing “real” camera. It’s not going to replace your interchangeable lens camera. It could replace your point-and-shoot, but I haven’t done that, because sometimes I want a pocket camera with a 28mm lens. Instead, the Ace Pro 2 with the grip has become an extra camera that I bring along when I want a wide angle or fisheye look and don’t feel like lugging a big, heavy, fast, full-frame, ultrawide lens.

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Raspberry Pi 4 variant gains second DRAM chip as memory shortage persists

Published

on


Raspberry Pi recently unveiled a new revision of the Raspberry Pi 4 Model B board. The single-board computer now comes in a “Dual RAM” variant, PCN 45, which adds a second DRAM module while maintaining near-full compatibility with existing software and accessories. The change reflects the current state of the…
Read Entire Article
Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

3D-Printed Bicycle Drivetrain Shows What Happens When You Have Gears Without a Chain

Published

on

3D-Printed Bicycle Drivetrain Gears
Sergii Gordieiev, the engineer behind “The Q,” is the mastermind behind some incredibly unique innovations, such as transforming regular bicycles into something entirely different. His new project involves disassembling a basic bike, removing the chain and derailleur, and replacing them with a chain composed of 3D printed gears. The end result is a stripped-down single-speeder that delivers power directly from the crank to the wheel, with no sign of chain slap or rattling worn chains.



Gordieev starts with a conventional bike, removes the chain, derailleur, and everything else, and then installs a one-of-a-kind spur gear combination created with Fusion 360. The drivetrain consists of a large gear that connects to the crank arms (where the chainring would normally be), as well as a series of smaller idler gears that fill the gap between the crank arms and the back wheel. Others have used three 16-tooth idler gears, but Gordieiev has opted for a series arrangement, which is simpler and more reliable.

Sale


VOLPAM Electric Scooter Adult, 19 MPH & 15 Miles Range, 350W Motor, 8.5″ Solid Tires, Lightwight Foldable…
  • ✅【 Powerful Performance】Equipped with a 350W brushless motor, this adult electric scooter reaches 19MPH and handles 15° inclines with ease,…
  • ✅【Long-Lasting Battery】This e scooter has 19 miles max long range on a single 4-5 hours fast charge, making it ideal for everyday commutes,…
  • ✅ 【Safety First】Scooter stay protected with a drum brake + EABS electronic brake system for quick, stable stopping. The bright LED headlight,…

3D-Printed Bicycle Drivetrain Gears
All of these components, as well as the mounts and supports that keep them firmly in place even when things go hairy, were created using the same 3D printer: a Phrozen ARCO. The epoxy used for these parts is of high quality, so they’re far more likely to last, which is useful because they can withstand the full force of your cycling without squeaking.

3D-Printed Bicycle Drivetrain Gears
Gordieiev to go through a significant amount of trial and error to get the proper gear balance that will just function, smoothly, silently, and without the irritating slippage or backlash that comes with a regular chain. Getting everything to fit together in the first place is a real conundrum, because each gear must fit snuggly into an axle or bearing fastened to the frame, or the entire drivetrain will fly apart the moment you start pedaling.

3D-Printed Bicycle Drivetrain Gears
When the bike is up and running, it is evident that the entire concept works in the real world. Sure, the moving teeth are a little louder than a quiet-shifting chain, but they move smoothly and consistently. While the power transfer is silky smooth, with almost no play from a worn chain, it’s a single-speed design, so you’re trapped heading downhill at full speed.
[Source]

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Apple iPhone 17 vs iPhone 16: Should you upgrade?

Published

on

Need a new iPhone but aren’t sure whether to opt for the latest iPhone 17, or to save a bit of money and get 2024’s iPhone 16? You’ve come to the right place.

While not all of us necessarily need the latest flagship smartphone, and opting for an older one is a great way to save money, many worry that there could be too much of a sacrifice. After all, smartphones are ingrained in our everyday lives so they need to be reliable.

With this in mind, we’ve compared our reviews of the iPhone 17 to the iPhone 16 so you can decide which handset to go for.

Otherwise, make sure you visit our list of the best smartphones and, if you aren’t yet sold on an iPhone, our best Android phones will offer our favourite alternatives.

Advertisement

Price and Availability

The iPhone 17 has a starting RRP of £799/$799, which is unsurprisingly more expensive than its younger sibling. However, it’s worth noting that this price is for the 256GB-sized handset.

Advertisement

SQUIRREL_PLAYLIST_10207955

In comparison, while the iPhone 16 starts at a cheaper £699/$699, this is for a much smaller 128GB-sized handset. In fact, if you want to upgrade to 256GB, then its RRP rises to more than the iPhone 17, at £899/$899. 

Advertisement

Design

  • Both the iPhone 17 and iPhone 16 share the same design
  • iPhone 17 is fitted with Ceramic Shield 2
  • Both include the Action and Camera Control buttons

Other than their colour selection, and the iPhone 17 being slightly bigger, there isn’t much difference between the two iPhone’s designs. Both sport the same flat edged, rounded corner design that was first introduced with the iPhone 12 – and this certainly isn’t a bad thing. Even so, there are a few tweaks with the iPhone 17 that although might not be visible, help make the handset feel more premium.

Firstly, the iPhone 17 sports Apple’s Ceramic Shield 2 protection on both the front and back, whereas the iPhone 16 is fitted with the older Ceramic Shield. Apple claims that Ceramic Shield 2 is more durable than its predecessor and should prevent micro-scratches from forming. Admittedly, we didn’t put the iPhone 17 through particularly wild tests to determine whether this is true, we still found that the panels remained scratch-free after prolonged use. 

Advertisement

Otherwise, both the iPhone 17 and 16 have an IP68-rating and include the reprogrammable Action and Camera Control button.

Winner: iPhone 17

Advertisement

Screen

  • iPhone 17 benefits from a 120Hz refresh rate while the iPhone 16 maxes out at 60Hz
  • The iPhone 17’s screen is slightly bigger at 6.3-inches
  • Both are OLED displays

Apple has finally taken the lead from the best Android phones (and even the majority of the best mid-range phones too) and introduced a 120Hz refresh rate to the iPhone 17. Coined ProMotion, the LTPO-enabled technology was previously reserved for its Pro models which was a huge bugbear for many. Instead, the iPhone 16 sports just a 60Hz refresh rate.

Using an iPhone 17Using an iPhone 17
iPhone 17. Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)

Advertisement

As expected, the inclusion of ProMotion makes the iPhone 17 feel impressively smooth in both everyday use and when gaming too, especially in comparison to the iPhone 16. In fact, we hailed the iPhone 17 as having “the best screen yet on an entry-level iPhone”. 

Otherwise, the iPhone 17 is actually slightly bigger than the iPhone 16, at 6.3-inches compared to 6.1-inches. Even so, both panels are OLED and support HDR10 and Dolby Vision content.

Winner: iPhone 17

Camera

  • Neither handset has a dedicated zoom lens but include a 2x in-sensor zoom instead
  • Both have main and ultrawide rear lenses, but the iPhone 17’s are both 48MP
  • The iPhone 17 has an upgraded 18MP square selfie camera

Apple made many thoughtful improvements with the iPhone 17’s camera hardware. While we’d still recommend opting for the iPhone 17 Pro if you’re serious about photography, the iPhone 17 is a brilliant choice for most casual snappers.

While both the iPhone 16 and iPhone 17 are equipped with a 48MP main lens which deliver consistently sharp and detailed shots, the iPhone 17 benefits from a 48MP ultrawide whereas the iPhone 16’s is just 12MP. The difference, perhaps unsurprisingly, is enormous as we found the iPhone 17 delivers a big jump in overall resolution and better low-light shots too.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Image captured on iPhone 17Image captured on iPhone 17
Captured on iPhone 17. Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)

One area which lets both the iPhone 17 and iPhone 16 down is the lack of dedicated zoom lens, like their Pro alternatives. Even so, both handsets are fitted with an in-sensor 2x zoom instead, which allows you to get closer without sacrificing quality and detail too. 

While the iPhone 16’s 12MP front lens is undoubtedly decent, the iPhone 17 boasts a welcome upgrade. Not only is the front camera 18MP but it’s now a square sensor which allows you to shoot portrait and landscape shots without actually having to rotate your phone. It may sound small, but it’s a seriously brilliant tweak.

Winner: iPhone 17

Performance

  • A19 vs A18 chips
  • The iPhone 17’s 120Hz refresh rate makes gaming and scrolling feel smoother
  • Apple has ditched the original 128GB storage option for 256GB with the iPhone 17

Although neither the iPhone 17 nor iPhone 16 are quite as powerful as their respective Pro siblings, both offer brilliant performance that’s enough for most users. In fact, unless you’re playing high-res AAA titles or editing multiple 4K video streams in LumaFusion, you’re unlikely to notice a difference.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Powering the iPhone 17 is Apple’s A19 chip which, when paired with the 120Hz refresh, ensures apps open instantly, scrolling feels smooth and you can comfortably achieve high frame rates in games too. 

iPhone 16 screeniPhone 16 screen
iPhone 16. Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)

Instead, the iPhone 16 runs on Apple’s A18 chip and remains a capable smartphone – even over a year on. In fact, we found in our benchmarking tests that it doesn’t come that far behind the iPhone 16 Pro Max. The biggest nuisance with the iPhone 16 is that it caps out at a 60Hz refresh rate. Even so, if you’re coming from an even older phone, you’re unlikely to notice this too much. 

Winner: iPhone 17

Software

  • Both support iOS 26
  • New Liquid Glass interface is easy to use and, we think, looks great
  • Apple Intelligence remains an afterthought

When the iPhone 16 launched back in 2024, arguably one of the reasons to buy the phone was the promise of the vast Apple Intelligence toolkit. Unfortunately, nearly two years on, Apple Intelligence still hasn’t quite come into its own.

Advertisement

Siri on iPhone 17Siri on iPhone 17
iPhone 17 Siri. Image Credit (Trusted Reviews)

Sure, Writing Tools is somewhat useful and Image Playground is fun for a while, but generally the AI toolkit fails to impress – especially when Gemini really does help to enhance the best Android phones. Essentially, with both the iPhone 17 and iPhone 16, we wouldn’t recommend buying either purely for Apple Intelligence. 

Otherwise, both the iPhones support iOS 26. Overall we don’t have many qualms with iOS 26 and find the software is polished, easy-to-use and feels familiar, even with the new Liquid Glass design. 

Advertisement

Winner: Tie

Battery

  • Both offer all-day battery life
  • iPhone 17 benefits from faster 40W wired charging
  • Both support a max 25W wireless charging

Advertisement

Apple has never boasted a strong reputation for battery life, especially when compared to many of the best Android phones which sport seriously mighty cells. Even so, we found that both the iPhone 17 and iPhone 16 are solid all-day handsets, as we easily ended days with some charge remaining.

Plus, if you want to top up during the day then it’s good to know both support wireless charging too.

However, the iPhone 17 benefits from faster 40W wired charging, which we found took around 85 minutes to reach 100%. In comparison, the iPhone 16 supports slightly slower speeds of 30W which took around 100 minutes to fully recharge.

Advertisement

Winner: iPhone 17

Verdict

With a 120Hz refresh rate, powerful processor and improved camera camera hardware, the iPhone 17 is an easy recommendation for many – especially if you’re coming from an older iPhone. 

Having said that, if you aren’t too fussed about having the absolute latest technologies and want to get a new-ish iPhone but without the high price tag, then the iPhone 16 remains a solid choice.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

This fusion energy startup thinks it can cut lasers out of the equation

Published

on


The company shared results from a new set of experiments with TechCrunch, suggesting that it could eliminate one of the most expensive and complex components of its fusion process – the laser preheating system – by making subtle adjustments to the machinery that ignites the reaction.
Read Entire Article
Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

How businesses can unlock the true value of modern log management

Published

on

Without logs, it would be almost impossible to keep modern applications, cloud platforms, or customer-facing services running efficiently. Some might argue that logs are one of the most critical but least celebrated sources of truth in the digital era.

At its core, log management is about turning raw system logs — unprocessed, detailed records of a system’s activities, including server actions, user interactions, and error messages — into actionable insights.

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Sixteen Claude AI agents working together created a new C compiler

Published

on

Amid a push toward AI agents, with both Anthropic and OpenAI shipping multi-agent tools this week, Anthropic is more than ready to show off some of its more daring AI coding experiments. But as usual with claims of AI-related achievement, you’ll find some key caveats ahead.

On Thursday, Anthropic researcher Nicholas Carlini published a blog post describing how he set 16 instances of the company’s Claude Opus 4.6 AI model loose on a shared codebase with minimal supervision, tasking them with building a C compiler from scratch.

Over two weeks and nearly 2,000 Claude Code sessions costing about $20,000 in API fees, the AI model agents reportedly produced a 100,000-line Rust-based compiler capable of building a bootable Linux 6.9 kernel on x86, ARM, and RISC-V architectures.

Carlini, a research scientist on Anthropic’s Safeguards team who previously spent seven years at Google Brain and DeepMind, used a new feature launched with Claude Opus 4.6 called “agent teams.” In practice, each Claude instance ran inside its own Docker container, cloning a shared Git repository, claiming tasks by writing lock files, then pushing completed code back upstream. No orchestration agent directed traffic. Each instance independently identified whatever problem seemed most obvious to work on next and started solving it. When merge conflicts arose, the AI model instances resolved them on their own.

Advertisement

The resulting compiler, which Anthropic has released on GitHub, can compile a range of major open source projects, including PostgreSQL, SQLite, Redis, FFmpeg, and QEMU. It achieved a 99 percent pass rate on the GCC torture test suite and, in what Carlini called “the developer’s ultimate litmus test,” compiled and ran Doom.

It’s worth noting that a C compiler is a near-ideal task for semi-autonomous AI model coding: The specification is decades old and well-defined, comprehensive test suites already exist, and there’s a known-good reference compiler to check against. Most real-world software projects have none of these advantages. The hard part of most development isn’t writing code that passes tests; it’s figuring out what the tests should be in the first place.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Alpine Skiing at Winter Olympics 2026 Free Streams

Published

on

Alpine skiing live streams at the 2026 Winter Olympics will see Austria attempt to continue their historic dominance of this event, with challenges expected from Switzerland and France.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

Ski Jumping at Winter Olympics 2026 Free Streams

Published

on

Ski jumping at the Winter Olympics should deliver plenty of drama and entertainment at Milano Cortina 2026.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

Why these startup founders are leaving Seattle for San Francisco

Published

on

Nour Gajial (left), CEO of MathGPT, and Avi Agola, co-founder of Talunt, recently left the Seattle region for San Francisco. (Photos courtesy of Gajial and Agola)

Seattle’s startup ecosystem has its strengths, and the city is a global AI hub. But for some tech entrepreneurs, the gravity of San Francisco is hard to resist — especially in the middle of an AI boom.

We caught up with early stage startup founders who recently relocated from Seattle to San Francisco — a move that echoes earlier eras when entrepreneurs with local roots ultimately built valuable companies elsewhere.

This time, founders say the pull is about being inside the “world’s AI capital” as a way to supercharge their startups.

“I knew that moving to SF — where the largest concentration of startups are — would be the best move for maximizing our success,” said Avi Agola, co-founder of recruiting platform Talunt.

Before he arrived at the University of Washington this past fall, Agola immersed himself in Seattle’s startup scene as a teenager. He worked out of Seattle founder hub Foundations, launched his own company, and sold it last year to a fellow Seattle startup.

Advertisement

Agola credits Seattle’s startup community with helping him develop credibility and understand what it takes to run a company.

But as he got Talunt off the ground, Agola packed his bags for San Francisco. Part of the decision was practical: Investors encouraged the move, and many of Talunt’s early customers are in the Bay Area.

Aviel Ginzburg, a Seattle venture capitalist who runs Foundations, said he understands the strategy.

“I think that anyone in their 20s who wants to build in startups should be living down there right now, simply for building a network to get lucky,” he said.

Advertisement

That was part of the reason Nour Gajial, CEO of MathGPT, also moved from Seattle to San Francisco.

After dropping out of Cornell to pursue her AI education startup full time, Gajial returned home to the Seattle area. She found a supportive, tight-knit tech community and a comfortable place to build.

But as MathGPT gained traction, Gajial and her co-founder started making trips to San Francisco. They noticed more startup events, younger founders, and more frequent in-person interactions with people building and funding AI companies.

“There’s always some new AI research that’s going on, or some event that will open your eyes about something,” Gajial said. “I don’t see that energy as much in Seattle.”

Advertisement

Gajial said she’s grateful to have met “some really cool founders” in Seattle. MathGPT co-founder Yanni Kouloumbis lauded the region’s talent pool. But they felt that being in Silicon Valley gives them better odds at making it big.

“We just want to put ourselves in the best possible situation for these spontaneously good things to happen to us,” Kouloumbis said.

Nistha Mitra. (Photo courtesy of Mitra)

Nistha Mitra spent three years in Seattle, where she worked at Oracle. She later launched Neuramill, an early stage company developing software for manufacturing, and noticed a clear divide between Seattle’s corporate tech culture and startup life.

“I don’t think my community in the Big Tech world had any awareness of startups and how startups work,” Mitra said.

Mitra moved to San Francisco six months ago. “In SF, everyone knows what’s going on, no matter who they are,” she said.

Advertisement

She described a hard-charging atmosphere where it’s normal behavior to work 15-hour days on your startup. Being in that environment “really changes how you perform,” Mitra said.

When she worked long days in Seattle, friends worried about her. “I feel like in SF, it’s kind of normalized, that kind of lifestyle,” she said.

The same calculus is playing out for more experienced techies.

Vik Korrapati, a Seattle-based founder who spent nearly a decade at AWS, recently announced that his AI startup Moondream is moving from Seattle to San Francisco. He framed the decision around the scale and urgency of the current AI moment.

Advertisement

Artificial intelligence, Korrapati wrote in an online post, is “the biggest platform shift we’re going to see in our working lives,” and relocating was about being “in the right place, with the right people” as his company builds high-performance vision models.

Korrapati said the move wasn’t driven by a lack of talent in Seattle, but by differences in risk tolerance and default behavior. “The issue isn’t ability. It’s default settings,” he wrote, describing a culture where many engineers optimize for stability and incremental progress rather than the uncertainty of early-stage startup work.

Ethan Byrd. (LinkedIn Photo)

In San Francisco, he said, he found more people who had already left Big Tech roles and were willing to make the startup leap. “Seattle has been good to me,” Korrapati said. “I learned how large systems work here. I got the space to spin up Moondream here. I’m not leaving angry.”

Ethan Byrd, a former engineer at AWS, Google, Meta, and Microsoft, helped launch Seattle software startup Actual AI in 2024. Now he’s working on a new startup called MyMX — and is strongly considering a move.

Seattle isn’t a bad place to build a startup, Byrd said, and he loves the city. But San Francisco is just on a different level when it comes to entrepreneurship.

Advertisement

“Everything is easier: hiring, talking to customers, raising money, hosting events,” he said. At the end of the day, as he tries to grow his new startup, Byrd said moving to Silicon Valley “just seems unavoidable.”

But not all Seattle founders are headed south.

“There’s a really good pool of talent right now, especially with the layoffs unfortunately happening,” said Ankit Dhawan, CEO of Seattle-based marketing startup BluePill. “We don’t feel any need to move out of here.”

Silicon Valley is great for fundraising and making connections. “But there comes a moment when it’s too much noise,” said Alejandro Castellano, CEO of Seattle AI startup Caddi. “You just need a place to actually focus on work.”

Advertisement

And when a trip to the Bay Area is needed — some of Caddi’s investors are based there — it’s a short flight away. “You can come back the same day,” Castellano said.

Sunil Nagaraj (left), founder of Silicon Valley venture capital firm Ubiquity Ventures, interviews Auth0 co-founder Eugenio Pace at an event at AI House last week. Nagaraj traveled to Seattle to host the event and visit with Seattle-area startups in Ubiquity’s portfolio. (GeekWire Photo / Taylor Soper)

Many Silicon Valley investors also make trips up to Seattle. Earlier this week, Sunil Nagaraj, managing partner of Palo Alto-based Ubiquity Ventures, hosted a startup event at Seattle’s AI House. During his fireside chat with Auth0 co-founder Eugenio Pace, he called out the various Seattle-based founders in the crowd that he’s backed. “Ubiquity Ventures ❤️ Seattle!!” Nagaraj wrote on LinkedIn.

Yifan Zhang, founder of AI House and managing director at the AI2 Incubator, said she wants to get more out-of-town investors connected to the Seattle region.

Zhang built her first startup in San Francisco. For certain types of founders, she said, Silicon Valley is a better place to create serendipitous relationships that can lead to a funding round or a large customer.

Yifan Zhang. (LinkedIn Photo)

“But it’s also easy to get lost in the mix, or get distracted by the hype,” Zhang noted. “It really depends on who you are, but no matter where you’re based, founders still need to do the hard work of selling and building an incredible product and scaling it.”

Seattle is still drawing in many founders from out of town. Real estate startup RentSpree moved here from Los Angeles last year, attracted to the tech talent base and concentration of other real estate and proptech companies.

Advertisement

“Seattle is really great for talent that balances both an aggressive growth perspective, but also building sustainable companies over time,” RentSpree CEO and co-founder Michael Lucarelli told GeekWire in December.

Vijaye Raji, founder and CEO of Seattle-area startup Statsig (acquired by OpenAI last year for $1.1 billion), has called it a “quiet talent” that may be under-appreciated.

Drone startup Brinc is another transplant that landed from Las Vegas. The company, now ranked No. 7 on the GeekWire 200, raised $75 million last year and employs more than 100 people. CEO Blake Resnick has cited the engineering and tech talent pool in Seattle for his decision to relocate.

The city’s technology anchors — including Microsoft, Amazon, the University of Washington, and Silicon Valley engineering centers — also help import workers who go on to launch companies. Overland AI CEO Byron Boots came to the UW’s computer science school in 2019 as an associate professor, and later helped launch the Seattle-based autonomous driving startup that just raised $100 million.

Advertisement

Caleb John, an investor and engineer at Seattle startup studio Pioneer Square Labs, previously worked in San Francisco. He noted that founders in Seattle “are not as deep in the rat race” relative to entrepreneurs elsewhere.

“Your thinking is not as clouded by the hype train,” he said in an interview with Foundations. He also cited a “really strong community of younger people who work in startups” across the Seattle region. “People just don’t know there are startup people here,” John said, noting that the startup scene has grown since he arrived in 2021.

Ginzburg said even as some founders move to San Francisco, it’s important to keep building community in Seattle. He noted that Agola, for example, still remains tethered to Seattle through the Foundations network.

Agola said he’d consider returning to Seattle at some point as his new startup grows.

Advertisement

“I don’t think the Bay is the best for long-term startup growth when it comes to post-series B,” he said. “Moving to Seattle would be the best play to keep the best talent flow while minimizing overhead costs.”

RELATED: ‘The hustle factor is real’: Why this fast-growing Seattle startup is packing its bags for Palo Alto

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025